Strikes were carried out on Ovidiopol, from where SBU's BECs were deployed to attack tankers.

30 980 43
Strikes were carried out on Ovidiopol, from where SBU's BECs were deployed to attack tankers.

On the night of December 1, Russian troops launched new attacks on targets in areas controlled by the Kyiv regime forces.

Numerous air strikes have been reported in Ovidiopol, Odessa Oblast. This city is located on the eastern bank of the Dniester Estuary.



According to the latest reports, it was from there that the SBU launched unmanned boats to attack tankers in the Black Sea. It should be noted that it was the Ukrainian security services that claimed responsibility for the strikes on the commercial vessels, claiming they were part of a "shadow" fleet Russia. "

Russian drones Geranium-class aircraft attacked a complex of warehouses and hangars in the coastal area of ​​Ovidiopol, Odessa, where a fire broke out.

The Ukrainian side states that the UAV “was extremely difficult to intercept due to the thick fog hanging over the Odessa region.”



A series of strikes were also recorded in the Chernihiv and Sumy regions. These strikes hit infrastructure facilities and Ukrainian Armed Forces personnel quarters, including in the regional capitals.

As a reminder, during his visit to Kyrgyzstan, the Russian president stated that hostilities would end as soon as the Ukrainian Armed Forces withdraw from the territories they occupy. As is known, the American version of the peace treaty plan refers to these territories as Donbas, and proposes "fixing" the front line in the Zaporizhzhia and Kherson regions.
43 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +14
    1 December 2025 07: 52
    Russian Geranium drones attacked a complex of warehouses and hangars in the coastal area of ​​Ovidiopol, Odessa.
    It's a pity that it happened after the drone attack, and not BEFORE!
    1. +4
      1 December 2025 08: 52
      Numerous arrivals have been reported in Ovidiopol, Odessa Oblast.

      According to the latest information, it was from there that the SBU launched unmanned boats to attack tankers in the Black Sea.


      Didn't you know before that they launched BEKs from there?
      Or not before margins It was?
      1. +4
        1 December 2025 15: 01
        Quote: your vsr 66-67
        Didn't you know before that they launched BEKs from there?

        Well, “we are avengers, not preventers.” laughing sad
      2. +3
        1 December 2025 22: 54
        Quote: your vsr 66-67
        Didn't you know before that they launched BEKs from there?
        Or was there no time for this field?

        It's called "taking the fight to the dogs," or "better late than never." A peculiar response to "an empty trail."
      3. +1
        1 December 2025 23: 27
        Before there was no team, we only hit back, but we have to constantly destroy everything.
    2. +1
      1 December 2025 10: 40
      Quote: Uncle Lee
      Russian Geranium drones attacked a complex of warehouses and hangars in the coastal area of ​​Ovidiopol, Odessa.
      It's a pity that it happened after the drone attack, and not BEFORE!


      A Geranium-3 rocket through the lens of a Ukrainian Sting interceptor drone.

      The enemy continues to demonstrate significant success in the development of anti-aircraft drones, which serve as a cheap and mass-produced alternative to more expensive and complex anti-aircraft missiles.

      While jet drones were previously considered virtually invulnerable to interceptors due to their much greater speed, this speed-based protection is no longer a panacea.

      "War Informant"


      https://t.me/swodki/543536
    3. +4
      1 December 2025 11: 22
      Let us recall that it was the Ukrainian special services that claimed responsibility for the strikes on commercial vessels, stating that they were part of Russia’s “shadow fleet.”

      What's there to laugh about? It's clear the ears of those bastards are sticking out from these blows. There's no anger left, only curses. How long...
    4. -1
      1 December 2025 19: 33
      No way! Only "in response to." Preferably after consulting with your "partners."
  2. +18
    1 December 2025 07: 54
    But couldn't we strike preemptively? The BECs did their job, but destroying the sheds where they were stored isn't exactly a success, at best a crisis management measure.
    1. +4
      1 December 2025 09: 48
      Quote: Comrade Beria
      But couldn't we strike preemptively? The BECs did their job, but destroying the sheds where they were stored isn't exactly a success, at best a crisis management measure.

      Apparently, until the BEKs emerged from there, intelligence paid no attention to these sheds. Perhaps they thought they were used for storing fishing nets. There are thousands of such sheds across Ukraine; you can't dispatch a "Stirlitz" to each one, and judging by everything, we're short on "Stirlitz" anyway. And no amount of "Geranium" missiles would be enough to destroy all of these sheds (preemptively, just in case).
    2. +4
      1 December 2025 11: 26
      But couldn't we strike preemptively? The BECs did their job, but destroying the sheds where they were stored isn't exactly a success, at best a crisis management measure.

      You can launch the BEKs anywhere. Just throw them on a boat trailer and launch them wherever there's access to the shore or a slipway.
      1. -2
        1 December 2025 15: 04
        Quote: ser-pov
        BECs can be launched anywhere.

        Not quite, there should still be an outlet to the sea in this place, based on this the solution to the problem is obvious.
    3. +5
      1 December 2025 12: 53
      But you couldn't strike preemptively?

      Who knows what was there? And theoretically, the BECs could be launched from different points each time. Arguing about it is pointless.
  3. +3
    1 December 2025 08: 01
    It's a strain. Did they have to sink three tankers for them to dare bother their "partners"?
  4. +7
    1 December 2025 08: 11
    Now we need to raise the issue at the UN about compensation from Ukraine for the restoration of Gambia, which was not involved in the conflict.
  5. +10
    1 December 2025 08: 12
    Can't we now focus on the ships sailing to the ports of Tsegabonia? Or are we going to continue playing football with only one goal?
    1. +1
      1 December 2025 08: 40
      Quote: paul3390
      Can't we now focus on the ships sailing to the ports of Tsegabonia? Or are we going to continue playing football with only one goal?

      You yourself answered your question.
      1. +7
        1 December 2025 09: 56
        Can't we now focus on the ships sailing to the ports of Tsegabonia? Or are we going to continue playing football with only one goal?

        Moreover, now it is possible to attack in neutral and territorial waters; the Ukrainian fascists have crossed the line... Let our submarines practice (not to mention the Beckys)...
        1. +4
          1 December 2025 10: 06
          Well, it's our side that keeps talking about all these lines, while the other side just casually fires wherever they can reach, paying no attention to anyone or anything. Personally, I wouldn't care about their civilian losses if there's a legitimate target. Look, the Jews are razing entire neighborhoods if they know some general is sitting there. And their conscience doesn't bother them, because it's war. It's either you or the other way around.
          1. +1
            1 December 2025 18: 02
            Quote: al3x
            Well, it's our side that keeps talking about all these lines, while the other side just casually fires wherever they can reach, paying no attention to anyone or anything. Personally, I wouldn't care about their civilian losses if there's a legitimate target. Look, the Jews are razing entire neighborhoods if they know some general is sitting there. And their conscience doesn't bother them, because it's war. It's either you or the other way around.

            Well, our leadership doesn't have to ask whether it's you or not. Everything is agreed upon there, they don't bother each other, even those who are recognized as terrorists and extremists.
        2. +1
          1 December 2025 23: 08
          Quote: megadeth
          Moreover, now it is possible to attack in neutral and territorial waters; the Ukrainian fascists have crossed the line... Let our submarines practice (not to mention the Beckys)...

          Unlike Ukraine (they even managed to steal a letter from their own real name), there's no problem with the "state sponsoring terrorism" status. But they're desperately trying (by hook or by crook) to pin it on Russia. Attacking civilian vessels in neutral waters would expose our country to such a designation.
          But if some "unorganized partisans of Ukraine" give it a whirl, then yes...
    2. -3
      1 December 2025 15: 07
      Quote: paul3390
      Can't we now also focus on the steamships going to the ports of Tsegabonia?

      It is impossible, at least some expert said so. laughing
  6. +3
    1 December 2025 08: 16
    Turkey's statement is interesting: they help Ukraine, and they sink ships in the Turkish economic zone.
    1. +8
      1 December 2025 08: 30
      Quote: APASUS
      Turkey's statement is interesting: they help Ukraine, and they sink ships in the Turkish economic zone.

      What did they expect? It's a pig under an oak tree! Get used to Ukraine's swinish behavior. laughing
  7. +4
    1 December 2025 08: 49
    Another gem from Krivoy Rog diplomacy:
    Ukraine has taken into account Kazakhstan's concerns regarding the situation at the Caspian Pipeline Consortium (CPC) marine terminal, the Ukrainian Foreign Ministry's press service reported on its Telegram channel.

    "We emphasize that no actions by the Ukrainian side are directed against the Republic of Kazakhstan or other third parties.", - the message says.

    The Ministry of Foreign Affairs added that it is acting within the framework of Article 51 of the United Nations (UN) Charter, which provides for the right of the organization's members to self-defense.


    Translated from Krivoy Rog into understandable language, Kazakhstan was sent on an erotic trek.

    And how will they deal with Turkey? Damaged tankers are leaking, and an environmental disaster is looming.
    1. +1
      1 December 2025 09: 08
      The damaged tankers "started leaking" An ecological catastrophe is looming.

      it doesn't look like a disaster...
      but there is already an "oil" trail of about 20 kilometers...
  8. 0
    1 December 2025 08: 55
    So you need to strike before the attack, and not afterward - at an empty base!
    1. +2
      1 December 2025 09: 59
      Quote: moreman78
      So you need to strike before the attack, and not afterward - at an empty base!

      Did you know there were BEKs in those sheds? Why didn't you tell the General Staff? sad
      1. -1
        1 December 2025 15: 10
        Quote: Piramidon
        Why wasn't this reported to the General Staff?

        And if they had reported it, do you think they would have reacted positively?
        1. +1
          1 December 2025 17: 05
          Quote: guest
          And if they had reported it, do you think they would have reacted positively?

          To know for sure, you have to try. At the very least, there are already many examples of strikes being carried out on targets reported by local residents (the so-called partisans).
  9. -2
    1 December 2025 09: 27
    from the looks N the after phots.. not very effective. lot of smoke. small holes..

    compared to the hothuis w their sandals N the sand - nothing to cheer about;;

    the hothuis send these tugs 2 the bottom
  10. +1
    1 December 2025 09: 42
    What's the point? There was 99% chance there was no one or anything there anymore. And anyway, these backups could have been launched from any rotten barge, not from stationary objects.
    1. -2
      1 December 2025 10: 29
      Shooting at empty barns, without any confirmation that anything was there, is certainly not bad, but the Ukrainian backers are in the Black Sea almost every day and at the same time attack Crimea and the Krasnodar region.
      1. 0
        1 December 2025 11: 07
        Or maybe these back-ups, like waiters, hang out in various squares of the sea and activate at any moment. There's no need to launch them straight from the barn into battle.
  11. +1
    1 December 2025 10: 57
    I wanted to ask. Wouldn't it make sense to demolish the bridge near Zatoka, where the isthmus is, so that nothing could float there? When and if Russia gets there, the 404 will blow it up anyway. With old torpedoes. And the submariners will get some practice at the same time. feel
  12. +3
    1 December 2025 11: 11
    Quote: paul3390
    Can't we now also focus on the steamships going to the ports of Tsegabonia?
    This should have been addressed back in February 2022. And not only ports, but also airports and railway hubs.
  13. +1
    1 December 2025 11: 16
    Quote: al3x
    Or maybe these backs, like waiters, hang out in different squares of the sea and can be activated at any moment

    Yeah, maybe they're just hanging out. They're based somewhere, right? Is the Russian Armed Forces just pestering Ovidiopol for no reason?
  14. +1
    1 December 2025 13: 21
    It's not serious. Obviously, if they'd known there were BEKs there, they would have struck long ago. As it was, they only found out after the attack; they didn't even see where it came from. Most likely, they simply destroyed some barns "somewhere around that direction," since they haven't yet come up with a proper response.
  15. VlK
    +2
    1 December 2025 13: 38
    It's a shame they didn't intercept the back-up ships while they were en route or in the holding area—that's precisely the Navy's job, monitoring waters and destroying identified targets, probably even its primary mission right now. The lack of attention paid to reconnaissance and situational awareness systems by the Air Defense Forces is likely to be a consequence.
  16. -1
    2 December 2025 04: 52
    Strikes were carried out on Ovidiopol, from where SBU's BECs were deployed to attack tankers.
    So, there probably aren't any BEKs there. They were launched to attack tankers.
    1. 0
      2 December 2025 05: 48
      So, if a tank has expended its ammunition, there's no point in hitting it? A plane dropped bombs on you, and you have the ability to drop it, but let it fly away? It's already empty, right? The BEKs have already left their base, so why bomb their deployment site, where they're stored and supplied, right??? 😆😆🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️
      1. 0
        3 December 2025 03: 30
        No, no. Ukrainians Fools, they stayed there with the BECs until they were caught.
  17. 0
    2 December 2025 05: 45
    "If a fight is inevitable, strike first!" (Vladimir Putin, 2022) (c)
    And then for the next four years all you hear is •" in response to... "🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️
  18. The comment was deleted.