Transport plane crashed at Bagram military base in Afghanistan

35
Transport plane crashed at Bagram military base in AfghanistanThe cause of the crash of a civilian transport aircraft in the area of ​​the American military base Bagram, located north of Kabul, could be a technical malfunction. This was reported by the Afghan news agency Pajwok.
According to him, rescue teams are working at the crash site. The disaster occurred immediately after takeoff. So far there has been no information about how many people were on board and whether anyone managed to survive. Who exactly owned the plane is also not known.
Meanwhile, as the representative of the Taliban movement Zabiullah Mujahid told the agency, the aircraft was shot down by his militants, everyone on board died.
Representatives of the Western coalition immediately refuted the statements of the rebels, pointing out that no militant activity in this area was noted.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    35 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +7
      April 29 2013 21: 20
      Ours, too, were shot down like that now by Amers .. for the second ten years they have been fighting there already
      1. +6
        April 29 2013 21: 34
        The "civilian" plane took off from "the largest military airfield". The engineers will write again. Or maybe PMCs were flying?
        1. 0
          April 29 2013 21: 42
          Quote: Sith Lord
          Or did PMCs fly?

          This is who are you? feel
          1. +9
            April 29 2013 22: 01
            Private military company (PMC; eng. Private military company) - a commercial enterprise offering specialized services related to participation in military conflicts or military operations, as well as intelligence gathering, strategic planning, logistics and consulting.
      2. +5
        April 29 2013 21: 35
        good
        40 tons of powder burned in the flame of the vast belly of a transporter !!!!!!!!!!
        Representatives of the Western coalition immediately refuted the statements of the rebels, pointing out that no militant activity in this area was noted.
        The Taliban are beautiful! We need to quickly triple "No activity".
        1. +15
          April 29 2013 21: 39
          And no matter how significant yesterday came the news:

          The head of the General Staff Valery Gerasimov said that Russia is creating its own Special Operations Forces (MTR) with the ability to operate abroad.

          They enter into business when diplomatic methods no longer work. They distract the forces and attention of certain countries from external problems, creating problems for them, rocking the political system, destabilizing the situation, including through third parties.
          Special operations forces create, train and lead foreign partisan movements and eliminate unwanted leaders without any sanctions.
          1. +3
            April 29 2013 21: 42
            By the way, I saw yesterday a video of this unit. They now have exercises in the North Caucasus.
        2. Rustiger
          +11
          April 29 2013 22: 16
          Quote: Papakiko
          40 tons of powder burned in a flame. . .

          <. ... Residents of two villages, who were covered with smoke from a burnt-out transport worker, "demand continuation of the free banquet." They are preparing to continue to take all possible measures to repeat what happened.>
          <. ... The comment of the elder of one of the villages was removed by the moderator due to the inadequacy of the commentator.>


          The portal informs afgan.narconews.gov
        3. TUMAN
          +4
          April 29 2013 22: 23
          Quote: Papakiko
          The Taliban are beautiful!

          Nope, the crew sniffed into the trash! laughing
          1. 0
            April 30 2013 00: 30
            Quote: TUMAN
            Nope, the crew sniffed into the trash!

            The co-pilot tried to straighten the left roll throughout the flight
            Although the navigator claimed that the roll to the right side))
        4. +4
          April 29 2013 22: 24
          Quote: Papakiko
          good
          40 tons of powder burned in the flame of the vast belly of a transporter !!!!!!!!!!
          Representatives of the Western coalition immediately refuted the statements of the rebels, pointing out that no militant activity in this area was noted.
          The Taliban are beautiful! We need to quickly triple "No activity".

          do not be like the Americans, they were also happy when the Mujahideen shot down ours in Afghanistan ...
      3. +3
        April 29 2013 22: 52
        Yes, NATO no longer has combat losses than combat losses in aircraft. I would have looked if the Taliban had been given something newer, then the amers, with their chorus of bloodsuckers, would run away in fear.
      4. +1
        April 30 2013 02: 21
        Earlier on Saturday, an ISAF MC-12 turboprop reconnaissance aircraft crashed in Shahjoy County, Zabul Province. Killed four American military pilots. A possible cause of the tragedy is called weather conditions.

        In October 2010, a National Air Cargo C-130 Hercules aircraft on its way to Kabul crashed, killing eight people - six Filipinos, an Indian and a Kenyan.
        1. +4
          April 30 2013 08: 02
          And the amers never admit that they are being brought down by the Taliban. Either "the weather is to blame," then the "accident." Even if so (but things are not so), why do we need THIS technique that "breaks down" every day?
        2. 0
          April 30 2013 08: 08
          Quote: Sith Lord
          Earlier on Saturday, an ISAF MC-12 turboprop reconnaissance aircraft crashed in Shahjoy County, Zabul Province. Killed four American military pilots. A possible cause of the tragedy is called weather conditions.

          In October 2010, a National Air Cargo C-130 Hercules aircraft on its way to Kabul crashed, killing eight people - six Filipinos, an Indian and a Kenyan.

          It will not be enough! (God forgive me!)
          1. 0
            April 30 2013 21: 03
            List of aviation losses of the international coalition in Afghanistan
            As of April 28, 2013, the following losses are listed:
            Helicopters #
            "Chinook" CH-47/MH-47/CH-147/HC.2 30
            "Black Hawk" UH-60 / HH-60 / MH-60 / S-70 18
            "Apache" AH-64 15
            "Kiowa" OH-58 9
            "Sea Stallion" CH-53 / MH-53 5
            "Iroquois" UH-1N / UH-1Y / CH-146 4
            "Super Cobra" AH-1W 4
            "Cougar" AS.532 1
            "Gazelle" SA-342M 2
            "Hind" Mi-24 2
            Total: 90 helicopters

            Aircraft #
            Harrier II 8
            C-130 5
            F-16 2
            B-1B 2
            C-12 / MS-12 2
            E-2C 1
            F-15E 1
            F / A-18 1
            P-3 1
            U-2 1
            U-28 1
            Mirage 2000 1
            Nimrod 1
            Rafal 1
            Tornado 1
            Total: 29 aircraft

            Convertibles #
            CV-22 1
            Total: 1 tiltrotor
      5. Nevsky
        +1
        April 30 2013 22: 20
        The fall of the transporter in Bagram, tin:

    2. 0
      April 29 2013 21: 33
      The "civilian" plane took off from "the largest military airfield". The engineers will write again.
    3. +5
      April 29 2013 21: 34
      Likely the receipt for not shelling was forgotten during time to pay. laughing
    4. VAF
      VAF
      +10
      April 29 2013 21: 41
      The news, as always ... And another photo of Hercules .... wassat

      Today at 15.30, when taking off from the runway of the Bagram airport, the Boeing 747-400 a / c National Air Cargo crashed on a flight commissioned by the US Air Transport Command

      Immediately after takeoff, the aircraft began to lose altitude and, colliding with the ground, caught fire in flames near the end of the runway at the air base.

      All 8 crew members died.

      According to a radio amateur listening to the frequency, the crew reported a stall due to a possible load displacement.

      CIVIL Airlines National Air Cargo operates 3 Boeing 747-400.

      Photos from the crash site ....

      1. +1
        April 29 2013 21: 53
        Quote: vaf
        The news, as always ...

        Yes, to "scoff".
        Not long ago I saw a Russian program, they talked about the possibility of joint actions near Khabarovsk against someone, maybe? smile
      2. +1
        April 29 2013 21: 53
        vaf you are handsome, thanks for the detailed information.
    5. +4
      April 29 2013 21: 43
      Today there was news that a passenger plane carrying Russian citizens was nearly shot down by surface-to-air missiles over Syria. Not a good trend. Apparently somewhere a warehouse with "bazookas" was robbed.
    6. 0
      April 29 2013 21: 46
      The whole history of Afghanistan has shown that Afghans cannot be defeated, they can only be killed.
      1. +3
        April 29 2013 21: 56
        Quote: d.gksueyjd
        cannot be defeated, they can only be killed

        And at what "mouse end" did it give up to you, do you want to live in those places or are they breathing out your oxygen and drinking water?
      2. +3
        April 29 2013 22: 11
        You can defeat at least someone, the British for 100 years 3 times put their puppets at the head of Afghanistan, despite the opinion of the people.
        But the British failed to keep the people in bondage for a long time, all 3 times they were thrown out of Afghanistan.
    7. Rustiger
      +4
      April 29 2013 22: 02
      Just recently it flashed in the news. They flew over Syria on a civilian Russian plane on the Shar-El-Sheikh - Kazan flight. airline "Nord Wings".
      Missiles exploded near the side. Onboard there were more than 200 passengers, no one was hurt.
      What does it mean? And if they shot down? . . .
      1. +1
        April 29 2013 22: 09
        I wonder at what altitude he flew?
        1. VAF
          VAF
          +6
          April 29 2013 22: 22
          Quote: Thunderbolt
          I wonder at what altitude he flew?


          Lyosha, walked 8 thousand meters with "kopecks", noticed an outbreak, considered it to be a rocket launch wassat
          From practice, a flash is never seen, only a TRACE is visible, and at night a colored fire is blue, greenish or reddish, depending on what you are being "shot" with!
          Theoretically possible, because self-liquidators very often took off spirits and a rocket instead of 3 thousand flies 6-7 minutes easily, but imagine. what if on a mountain or hill (which they always did)?
      2. 0
        April 29 2013 22: 20
        Quote: Rustiger
        They flew over Syria on a civilian Russian plane on the Shar-El-Sheikh - Kazan flight. airline "Nord Wings".

        Gon and p3,14sh!
        Over Syria Tourist charters do not fly. They did not fly and will not fly.
        Look at the globe and count km.
        1. Rustiger
          +1
          April 29 2013 22: 37
          Quote: Papakiko
          Gon and p3,14sh!

          Respect! And what is the reason for me for the left races? For what, K.G. "bought". ... ...
          Infa from all news feeds. I just wanted to hear the opinion of the man about another scenario development.

          http://news.404.ru/
          http://www.mignews.com/news/disasters/world/290413_200846_99490.html
          http://www.vestnik-news.com/lenta.html
          1. +1
            April 29 2013 23: 20
            Quote: Rustiger
            Respect! And what is the reason for me for the left race? For what, K.G. "bought"

            I am without presenting you, do not take it personally, I am about "news". hi
            1. Rustiger
              0
              April 29 2013 23: 44
              No problem. I understood Yes hi
        2. +2
          April 29 2013 22: 38
          Yes, Hi Sergey! 8.000 decent altitude, for some reason I immediately thought that they were flying lower and fired at them from the borders. IMHO, tomorrow an article will appear on the forum about this incident.)
          1. +1
            April 29 2013 22: 54
            Quote: Papakiko
            Over Syria Tourist charters do not fly.
            With all due respect, they fly hi
            1. +5
              April 29 2013 23: 09
              Quote: Thunderbolt
              With all due respect, they fly

              To fly in the airspace of any state, you must coordinate or pay a bribe.
              In the case of Egypt: all Egyptian charters fly through Al-Arish, take a right turn over the sea in neutral waters, fly almost over Cyprus to the Turkish Mersin and enter Anapa-Sochi into the airspace of the Motherland.
              Therefore, erase your red line on the laid out chart map. soldier the earth has the shape of a "ball" and not flat, "resting on 3 elephants, 3 whales, 3 turtle"
              You can check my words by buying an urgent ticket to the warm "ancient" Egypt and make sure that my words are correct. Only one condition: DON'T HOOK DUTY FREE, skip everything.
            2. +1
              April 30 2013 04: 42
              I recalling the Ukrainians, as during an exercise, mistakenly shot down a Tu-154 flying from Novosibirsk in my opinion to Haifa (Israel). Connect Novosibirsk and Haifa on your map and your red line will pass far from the Black Sea, where this plane was shot down.
              Aircraft do not fly in a straight line, but according to a flight plan, which is made up of the accounting, cost and the very possibility of using the airspace of one or another country, and even inside the country, airplanes fly in corridors that do not always allow flying in a straight line.
            3. 0
              April 30 2013 05: 11
              Quote: Thunderbolt
              With all due respect, fly hi
              Sitting near a globe ... Geometry bullshit. The shortest distance on a globe-arc lol And airplanes fly most often in a neutral sky .. Money saves ...
          2. 0
            April 29 2013 23: 19
            Alexei, they didn’t reach a good time of day, because right after take-off.
            1. 0
              April 29 2013 23: 28
              Quote: Papakiko
              erase your red line on the laid out map diagram
              And I would be glad to erase this "thin red line", but it is not mine, but from the carrier's website (http://aviametr.ru/skolko-letet-sharmal-sheih-kazan-vremya-poleta.html), and when I had dinner I heard from the next room on the 1st that there are many air routes over Syria, including this one.
              Quote: Papakiko
              by buying urgently a ticket to the warm "ancient" Egypt
              Thank you, I prefer to warm my heart in the Zhiguli mountains drinks
              1. +2
                April 30 2013 03: 31
                Right !!! In our Lada no worse !!!!! hi
                1. +1
                  April 30 2013 04: 06
                  Quote: Andrey57
                  In our Lada no worse !!!!!
                  Yes, it will be even better)))
          3. 0
            April 29 2013 23: 21
            Alexei, they didn’t reach a good time of day, because right after take-off.
            1. +1
              April 29 2013 23: 29
              Status: Zwischenbericht
              Date: 29 APR 2013
              Zeit: at 15:00
              Flugzeugtyp: Boeing 747-428BCF
              Fluggesellschaft: National Airlines (National Air Cargo)
              Kennzeichen: N949CA
              Werknummer: 25630/960
              Baujahr: 1993-01-29 (20 years 3 months)
              Triebwerk: 4 General Electric CF6-80C2B1F
              Besatzung: Todesopfer: 7 / Insassen: 7
              Fluggäste: Todesopfer: 0 / Insassen: 0
              Gesamt: Todesopfer: 7 / Insassen: 7
              Sachschaden: Zerstort
              Konsequenzen: Written off (damaged beyond repair)
              Unfallort: Bagram Air Base (BPM) (Afghanistan)
              Flugphase: Start (TOF)
              Betriebsart: Frachtflug
              Flug von: Bagram Air Base (BPM/OAIX), Afghanistan
              Flug start: ?

              http://aviation-safety.net/database/record.php?id=20130429-0&lang=de
    8. pinecone
      +3
      April 29 2013 22: 21
      According to the Deutsche Welle radio station, on April 27, the Taliban announced the beginning of the "spring offensive", emphasizing that the airfields used by the international coalition troops, as well as the buildings of diplomatic missions, would be selected as targets.
      1. +1
        April 30 2013 02: 32
        Quote: pinecone
        the Taliban announced the beginning of the "spring offensive", emphasizing that the airfields used by the troops of the international coalition will be selected as targets
        Operation "Concert" in the Afghan way. If they are not bluffing and are going to attack, then attack what? Infrastructure of well-guarded airfields or aircraft? If the latter, then the best means is MANPADS. Here is where they will get them ... Drug money, they have and the smuggling channels are functioning properly. Without political sanction, whoever sells figs to them, the goods are "piece" and all supplies are tightly controlled.
        1. +1
          April 30 2013 03: 35
          Considering that after the collapse of Libya several thousand "Eagles" were missing, then for good "powder" money the Taliban will be given a lot of them for the whole spring offensive ...
          1. 0
            April 30 2013 04: 03
            Yes, if only there. There are two versions where they migrated: 1) they were captured by Islamic radicals; 2) they were scooped up by European special forces. A .... 3) 50/50.
      2. +2
        April 30 2013 05: 16
        The airfield in Bagram is built so that the planes are defenseless during take-off and landing. So it is very doubtful to me that nothing was fired. Another question is why the devices didn’t work and did not notify the crew about the capture of MANPADS ...
    9. +3
      April 29 2013 22: 23
      ........... The cause of the crash of a civilian transport aircraft in the area of ​​the US military base Bagram, located north of Kabul, could be a technical malfunction........ The technical malfunction is called the "Stinger" MANPADS, which was successfully delivered by lovers of democracy to dushmans ...... as they say -Hello to the participants of the competition .....
    10. pinecone
      0
      April 29 2013 22: 41
      Quote: Papakiko
      Quote: Rustiger
      They flew over Syria on a civilian Russian plane on the Shar-El-Sheikh - Kazan flight. airline "Nord Wings".

      Gon and p3,14sh!
      Over Syria Tourist charters do not fly. They did not fly and will not fly.
      Look at the globe and count km.


      I don’t know now, but they used to fly. One of the routes passed over the territory of Turkey, Syria, Jordan, and then over the Gulf of Aqaba along the eastern coast of the Sinai Peninsula.
      1. +3
        April 29 2013 22: 54
        Quote: pinecone
        One of the routes passed over the territory of Turkey, Syria, Jordan, and then over the Gulf of Aqaba along the eastern coast of the Sinai Peninsula.

        VAF would be nice to explain to people that Aviation has rules and internationally agreed routes, flights and flight altitudes.
        1. +2
          April 29 2013 23: 48
          Once again, good day.


          Go to http://www.flightradar24.com/
          IRA 512 flight is currently flying over Syrian territory
    11. Vtel
      +2
      April 29 2013 22: 54
      The catastrophe occurred immediately after take-off.

      In years it’s more convenient to beat - tactics however.
      Well, the Yankees provided dushmans, now they are reaping the benefits, or more correctly, technical malfunctions. Their weapons on their own aircraft.
    12. waisson
      0
      April 30 2013 02: 08
      April 29. / Corr. ITAR-TASS Dmitry Tarasov /. All eight crew members of the transport plane that crashed on Monday near the US military base Bagram in Afghanistan were killed. This was reported today by the Afghan Pajwok news agency.
      According to him, a civilian cargo Boeing 747 of the US-based company Nanshl Air Cargo, chartered by the International Security Assistance Force in Afghanistan (ISAF), crashed into the mountain almost immediately after takeoff at 16:00 local time / 16:30 Moscow time /. The liner fell apart and caught fire. Rescue teams continue to work at the crash site. The Bagram airbase is temporarily closed.
      According to the Chief of Police of the Bagram County / 50 km north of Kabul / Colonel Zmaray Nasiri, according to preliminary data, a technical malfunction was the cause of the disaster. Meanwhile, as representatives of the Taliban movement said earlier, the aircraft was shot down by its militants, and the crew was killed. Representatives of the Western coalition immediately denied the insurgents' claims, pointing out that no militant activity in the area had been noted.
    13. Dima190579
      -1
      April 30 2013 04: 43
      Dear comrades, tell me why the Americans and Europeans should cover military losses with accidents and accidents.
    14. waisson
      +1
      April 30 2013 04: 57
      The Bagram military base used to transport goods by the forces of the international coalition accepts flights of civilian airlines, whose crews include citizens of the CIS.
    15. shitovmg
      +2
      April 30 2013 06: 05
      The Americans stepped on our rake, thought they were special ...
    16. Owl
      +1
      April 30 2013 06: 17
      Most of the pilots of airplanes and helicopters flying on the territory of Afghanistan are from the countries of the "former USSR", only the crews from the representatives of the "post-Soviet space" are ready for a much lower payment (several times) in comparison with the "transport workers" from NATO countries to fly in this dangerous region.
    17. pinecone
      -2
      April 30 2013 08: 00
      Quote: Papakiko

      In Aviation, there are rules and internationally agreed routes, flight levels and flight altitudes.


      Deep thought.
    18. dc120mm
      0
      April 30 2013 10: 55
      And what did not know how many people were on board?

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"