The Belarusian-Emirati project of the E-System Solutions LCCM Mk 2 missile system

5 987 23
The Belarusian-Emirati project of the E-System Solutions LCCM Mk 2 missile system
Rocket LCCM Mk 2 complex


Following recent conflicts, armies around the world are showing increased interest in long-range missile and unmanned strike systems. In turn, industries around the world are trying to meet this demand. Another example of this weapons The Belarusian-Emirati company E-System Solutions recently proposed this. It developed the LCCM Mk 2 missile system and claims to be capable of achieving high performance characteristics.



The complex is on display


E-System Solutions was recently founded by specialists from Belarus and the United Arab Emirates. While it hasn't demonstrated any significant success to date, it now plans to enter the international arms market with its new development.

In mid-November, the company participated in the Dubai Airshow 2025 international military-technical exhibition. At its booth, it debuted a promising missile system, designated LCCM Mk 2 (Low-Cost Cruise Missile). The exhibit included models of the missile and other components of the system.

The project's goal is to create a land- and ship-based multipurpose missile system capable of striking single targets at long range. It is expected that such a system will be able to attack and destroy the positions of various systems, command posts, and even individual combat vehicles.

The system is being developed entirely from scratch. Its core component is a cruise missile with enhanced flight characteristics. Several payload options are being proposed, increasing operational flexibility. The missile is intended to be used with launchers of various designs.

E-System Solutions has reportedly already completed the development of the system. Preparations are currently underway for field testing, which will begin in the foreseeable future. However, the company cannot even provide an approximate timeline for completion of these tests. Consequently, it is unknown when the project will be able to enter serial production.

The LCCM Mk 2 missile system design was presented to specialists and the public just a few days ago. Potential customers apparently only learned about it at the exhibition in Dubai. Now they will have to evaluate the Emirati-Belarusian development and determine whether to purchase such systems.


The commercial potential of the LCCM Mk 2 is still unclear. Such a weapon may be of interest to various militaries, but specific orders are still uncertain. However, the UAE was involved in the project's development, which could serve as a clear hint. It's quite possible that the Emirati army will be the first customer, but this will only happen in the indefinite future.

Components and Tools


The LCCM Mk 2 is a land- or ship-launched missile system. Several launcher variants for different platforms and associated assets were developed within the same project. A common cruise missile with high performance characteristics was also created. This system is designed to attack and destroy distant targets on land or at sea.

The LCCM Mk 2 system's core component is the cruise missile of the same name. This munition features a traditional design, combining simple design with high performance. It is claimed that this product will have a limited cost.

The missile has a streamlined fuselage with a variable cross-section. Its upper section features a hinged joint with winglets that deploy in flight. The tail unit is V-shaped. The interior is dedicated to the warhead, control systems, liquid fuel tanks, and engine.

The aircraft is 3,15 meters long and has a wingspan of 2,5 meters. Its dry weight is less than 90 kg. Its maximum takeoff weight, depending on its configuration, reaches 122 kg. Its key flight characteristics depend on its takeoff weight: a lighter configuration allows for increased range.

The LCCM Mk 2 is launched using a solid-fuel motor, which is jettisoned after its propellant charge is exhausted. The main turbojet engine then ignites. It uses a compact turbojet engine of an unspecified type. Its air intake is a window in the upper fuselage.

Depending on the selected mode and flight profile, the rocket should reach speeds between 220 and 600 km/h. The maximum flight altitude is 11500 m. Range varies widely. With a minimum payload, it should reach 1000 km. The maximum payload reduces this range by half.

The missile's guidance system has not yet been disclosed. Based on its stated capabilities, the LCCM Mk 2 has satellite and inertial navigation and a radio altimeter. It is possible that a radar homing head, concealed under a distinctive fairing, is used during the terminal phase of the trajectory.


A launcher with multiple missiles

Several warheads weighing between 25 and 50 kg have been developed for the new missile. The warhead type determines the missile's striking capabilities and range. Customers are offered high-explosive fragmentation warheads with directional and non-directional dispersion of fragments. Thermobaric and concrete-piercing warheads are also available.

The LCCM Mk 2 missile is designed to launch from a rail. The launcher can carry up to nine such devices. It is proposed to mount the launcher on a suitable chassis or on a carrier ship. A containerized version suitable for transport on various platforms has also been developed.

At the project level


E-System Solutions announced the completion of the design of a new missile system and preparations for its testing. It is still unknown how soon the LCCM Mk 2 will be sent to the test site and demonstrate its true capabilities. However, it is already clear that such events are of particular importance—they will demonstrate whether Belarusian and Emirati specialists have succeeded in creating a weapon with the stated combination of technical, combat, and economic characteristics.

As presented, the LCCM Mk 2 system has several interesting features that could prove advantageous. First and foremost, the missile's stated range is noteworthy. Depending on the payload, it can reach up to 1000 km. Another positive feature is the availability of several warhead types for different missions.

The new missile is proposed to be equipped with several standardized launchers compatible with various platforms. This makes the system versatile in terms of deployment and use. At the same time, it apparently won't place any special demands on its launch vehicles.

At the same time, the LCCM Mk 2 is not without its controversial features or obvious shortcomings. First and foremost, its origins are a cause for concern. Belarus and the UAE lack extensive experience in developing similar systems, and the ability to achieve the stated performance is currently questionable.

Precise information about the new missile's guidance system is still lacking. This seriously hinders the assessment of its combat capabilities and overall potential. First and foremost, the ability to independently search for a target in a given area is questionable. If the missile can only attack targets with predetermined coordinates, this places increased demands on reconnaissance and target acquisition.

Thus, an international joint venture has proposed and developed an intriguing design for a long-range missile system. It is now preparing to demonstrate its product's potential in practice and is likely awaiting orders. Whether the projected characteristics will be confirmed and customers found remains to be seen. However, the LCCM Mk 2 project demonstrates that the complexity of developing modern missile technology is declining, making it feasible even for companies with little experience.
23 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -1
    27 November 2025 08: 06
    At the same time, the LCCM Mk 2 project shows that the complexity of developing modern missile technology is decreasing, and now even companies without experience can engage in it.
    In general...Yas was mowing the stables, he looked at the girl, and the girl was reaping the rye and answered with her eyes! request
    1. +2
      27 November 2025 09: 39
      Well, if China has gotten its hands on mini-TRDs and they're selling them through Ali Express...then why not.
      The main secret here is the Glonass/GPS receiver, its accuracy, and its resistance to interference. If unjammed, the GPS's accuracy is sufficient for the precise destruction of a stationary target.
      Let me remind you that our commercial turbojet engines from China are attached to a 500 kg cast iron bomb. And it flies 200 km.
      There could be two turbojet engines, a plastic hull, and voila – a cruise missile. And there aren't many countries with a continuous, layered air defense system, so if any country with reconnaissance and navigation capabilities supports it, the accuracy and timeliness of arrival will be very good.
      1. +1
        27 November 2025 13: 37
        Quote: Zaurbek
        We attach commercial Chinese turbojet engines to a 500 kg cast iron bomb. And it flies 200 km.

        Plus at least 2 million rubles to tighten it up.
        1. 0
          27 November 2025 14: 26
          Yes, but a cruise missile with a comparable 500 kg warhead will be significantly more expensive.
  2. 0
    27 November 2025 09: 11
    A friend and I went to technical conferences in Ukraine in the early 2000s. The following scene was observed there.
    When Ukrainians spoke with our specialists, they demonstrated two trends.
    "We have a common history... great old connections... What's new with you?... Give us money, some of your developments... Tell us about your know-how..."
    Second.
    "We are independent now... Why the hell do we need your Russia? We can get everything from the West now...."
    1. +2
      27 November 2025 09: 41
      The latter won. Even when the former were starting out. We can recall the already completed projects (to the detriment of ours): the An140, An70, An148, engines for ships and helicopters. That's the market, the money's already been spent on the product—now make money.
  3. 0
    27 November 2025 10: 22
    Why aren't we using Belarusian developments for joint projects? Even with the Arabs, for example? The entire world is consolidating its efforts to create weapons—some with money, some with ideas, some with materials, some with technology—and the result is joint developments from countries that previously didn't have their own factories. For example, the UAE snatched up ideas and engineers from South Africa, and now they have a ton of ideas (at exhibitions), and they're actually making some. The Chinese are helping Pakistan a lot. Why shouldn't we use third countries to combine ideas and technology from Russia and the West? After all, those countries are focusing on Western or Chinese components. We, on the other hand, proudly and stubbornly follow our own independent path. We could have knocked something together with South Africa, or with North Korea, China, or Iran. And after developing the joint project, we could have fully localized it ourselves, to develop technologies, expand factories, and train people for the future. This missile system could be jointly developed and put into production... then, in the second generation, let the Belarusians make their own version, and we'll make our own. Or the Polonez MLRS... why not use its developments, with Chinese permission, to upgrade the Tornado-S or Sarma? Armored vehicles—the Volat family... maybe the Boomerang will help polish it up. And so on. But for some reason, we're rejecting foreign developments and ideas. This would reduce the time to production by minimizing the development and refinement phase.
    1. +1
      27 November 2025 11: 33
      We made the Brahmos missile with the Indians. We made the Pantsir missile with Arab money.
      1. +4
        27 November 2025 11: 39
        But there are too many examples of abnormal behavior from such partners. The Indians changed their minds about collaborating on the Su-57, and now they're biting their elbows. The Italians practically screwed us over the Yak-130. Things didn't work out with the Chinese on the civilian aircraft.
        Everyone is trying to get technology under the guise of cooperation and then rip you off.
        1. 0
          27 November 2025 12: 12
          It's just that Western companies and countries don't do this to each other. Is it okay to screw Russia? Is there no respect or fear? It turns out respect is based not on honesty and words, but on the fear of inevitable punishment. So why can't we jointly develop and localize the full cycle of all components ourselves, and then go our separate ways?
          1. +1
            27 November 2025 13: 02
            No one is currently able to organize a full cycle within a single country. This is deliberately designed to quickly curtail the overly independent.
            Now we and China are doing this. That's where the problems come from.
            Western companies generally have a single owner, so there are no such problems in the West. But we now need to rid ourselves of this "owner's" influence within the Russian Federation. And that's what we're doing.
    2. +1
      27 November 2025 13: 41
      Quote: rosomaha
      Polonez MLRS...why not use its developments with Chinese permission to upgrade the Tornado-S?

      The Polonez missile is Chinese, I understand. The launcher is Belarusian.
  4. +1
    27 November 2025 10: 49
    Father, it seems, works for Hitler...
  5. 0
    27 November 2025 11: 42
    After the crooked Palonezes, the RF Armed Forces Acceptance Authority is looking at this product with caution.
    1. 0
      13 January 2026 19: 13
      Could you tell me more about the crooked Polonaises, or is it just white noise in my head?
  6. 0
    27 November 2025 14: 24
    The idea is interesting and relevant.
    In 2003, we developed the Hermes missile system with a range of 100 km to hit small targets.
    But it never went into mass production.
    1. 0
      27 November 2025 16: 10
      Quote: dragon772
      The idea is interesting and relevant.
      In 2003, we developed the Hermes missile system with a range of 100 km to hit small targets.
      But it never went into mass production.

      Back then, it wasn't clear who would guide it to the target at the end of the flight. Hermes had a semi-active laser seeker. And there was no drone with a laser targeting system to illuminate the target.
      1. 0
        27 November 2025 19: 09
        You'll guess in three tries. Obviously, the silent guys from the GRU...
      2. 0
        28 November 2025 10: 51
        But now there are UAVs with laser illumination.
  7. 0
    27 November 2025 17: 52
    Cooperation with the Saudis is understandable: firstly, it’s money, and secondly, it’s access to Western technology.
    Somehow Ukrainians They wanted to collaborate with the Saudis, to produce the An-132 there, supposedly a new project based on the An-32. Western avionics, engines, and this and that. There was a lot of noise, a breakthrough aircraft, we'll bombard the whole world with planes. Now there's complete silence; where the aircraft is, where the project itself is, no one knows.
    I don’t want to predict anything, but I have a nagging doubt that this Belarusian project will meet the same fate.
  8. 0
    27 November 2025 18: 07
    Quote: Zaurbek
    The latter won. Even when the former were starting out. We can recall the already completed projects (to the detriment of ours): the An140, An70, An148, engines for ships and helicopters. That's the market, the money's already been spent on the product—now make money.

    The An-70 was created according to the technical specifications of our Ministry of Defense.
  9. +1
    27 November 2025 19: 21
    I'm really curious, who needs this thing that's not a missile? Totally subsonic, and high-altitude, too! With a range of probably a thousand meters... A 25 kg warhead... Who is this against? You can't even knock down a building... Only against stationary radars, perhaps, but who would let such a thing get close to it? Let's calculate the maximum speed of 600, divide by 3.6 and get 167 meters per second... And even then, I suspect it reaches this speed when it dives towards the target from the declared altitude. Then, 200, divide by the same 3.6 and get 56 meters per second... And that's exactly the speed at which this miracle will scurry towards the target... So, the bottom line is that this marvel of engineering will reach its target in 5 hours. Are you serious? On a Chinese engine, which, although it has a 16-hour lifespan, I suspect it's not for continuous use... Don't make me laugh with this engineering marvel...
    1. 0
      28 November 2025 11: 22
      A warhead weighing 25-50 kg is too small for satellite navigation guidance. If the operating country lacks access to a military satellite navigation signal, the CEP will be 10 meters at best, or even more.