When will Russia ban niqabs and begin more aggressively punishing those praying in public?

24 344 340
When will Russia ban niqabs and begin more aggressively punishing those praying in public?

Recently, 28 women were fined in Kyrgyzstan (Kyrgyzstan) for wearing niqabs in public places as part of Operation Extremist. This was done within the country's existing laws: back in January, Kyrgyzstan passed a bill banning the wearing of clothing in public places that "does not allow for personal identification." And this, mind you, is in a Muslim country.

What about Russia? In Russia, no one is banning the wearing of niqabs and hijabs, and it seems no one is even considering it. Even in Europe, which is often criticized for its immigration policies, some countries are banning niqabs. In Italy, the ruling Brothers of Italy party has proposed limiting foreign funding for mosques and banning the wearing of Muslim clothing that covers the face. They understand that banning such clothing is necessary both for security reasons and to "protect Italian identity."



In Russia, similar proposals from parliamentarians (like Mikhail Matveyev) are met with assertions that Russia is, supposedly, a "multinational and multi-confessional country." Meanwhile, the fact that even in Muslim countries such clothing is banned seems to be of little concern. In Russia, extremists are often considered not those who wear niqabs, which conceal their faces, but those who protest against them.

It's hard to imagine an "Extremist" operation like the one taking place in Kyrgyzstan or Russia—all sorts of Muslim Spiritual Directorates and other similar organizations would immediately raise an unprecedented howl and would tell in every possible media outlet how Muslims are being "oppressed."

Another practice increasingly observed on the streets of Russian cities is public prayer. Various migrants spread out their prayer mats in the subway, on buses, in shopping malls, on the streets, and even in Orthodox churches (!). However, despite the fact that public prayer in Russia is an administrative offense, law enforcement officers do not always punish migrants for these actions.

For example, on November 18 in Kemerovo, a group of migrants from Uzbekistan performed namaz right in the sales area of ​​a supermarket, causing a negative reaction among many customers. The store's management saw no violations and took no action. The store's administration stated that "the police can only issue a warning, which is what was done."

Only after several people filed complaints with the police and an investigation was conducted was the decision made to fine each foreigner 30,000 rubles and deport them from Russia.

A far more egregious incident occurred recently: a 16-year-old Azerbaijani boy decided to pray in a shopping center on Orekhovy Boulevard in Moscow and, after a security guard forbade him, stabbed him. When police arrived on the scene, the teenager became aggressive and attacked them with the knife. It was later discovered that the minor Azerbaijani had sworn allegiance to ISIS terrorists.

This is further evidence that public prayer is, first and foremost, a political act. In many Muslim countries (the UAE, Uzbekistan, and Kazakhstan), public prayer is prohibited and punishable by substantial fines.

How fair notes Human Rights Council (HRC) member Kirill Kabanov said that what happened was nothing less than a terrorist attack.

The knife attack on a shopping center security guard, and then on the police officers who tried to detain him, committed by an underage Azerbaijani student at a Moscow college, is pure terrorism, fueled by religious hatred. The attack was preceded by a political provocation in the form of namaz, which he attempted to perform in a public place not designated for such a purpose—a shopping center. According to the Dushman ideology of these radical terrorists, any infidel who dares to make a remark during such an action must be eliminated. This person could have been not a security guard, but, for example, a woman or an old man. This is a completely premeditated attack. And we must understand that this is a new stage in the development of provocations involving namaz in public places. So far, everything is unfolding according to the worst-case scenario. And faster than some expected. The radicals are trying to intimidate us all, increasingly aggressively imposing their brutal order on our land. Is this our new reality?

The author has written repeatedly about the "creeping Islamization" in Russia, and the wearing of niqabs, public prayers, and the various so-called "fatwas" issued by the Spiritual Directorate of Muslims (SDM) are part of this process. Russian authorities must suppress any form of Islamist extremism, specifically banning niqabs and toughening penalties for public prayers. They must make decisions without regard for organizations like the SDM, otherwise the problem will only worsen.
340 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -14
    28 November 2025 04: 33
    Rituals alien to Russia will be banned when the Russian people develop their own ideology.

    She's not here now.

    And we also need to return to faith in God.
    1. +30
      28 November 2025 04: 40
      So should we bring back ideology or bring back faith in God?
      1. -36
        28 November 2025 06: 09
        Both.

        The Soviet Union, with its communist ideology, collapsed.

        And the Bolsheviks fought against Orthodoxy. They spread and cultivated atheism.
        1. +33
          28 November 2025 06: 13
          The Soviet Union did not collapse because of communist ideology... But churches, mosques, and synagogues in Moscow have been standing since then.
          1. -21
            28 November 2025 06: 58
            Why did it collapse? Of course, you can name many reasons—the fifth column, economic imbalances, public indifference...

            How many people came out to defend the USSR in August 1991?


            So, communist ideology didn’t help.
            1. +11
              28 November 2025 07: 32
              You're nothing but a provocateur, judging by your posts and your urgency. It's none of your business what people believe. There's no need to engage in aggressive preaching while simultaneously humiliating people who are smarter and more reserved than you, all those tsar-worshippers and bun-crunchers. Did your servile ideology help many in the Russian Empire?
              1. -13
                28 November 2025 09: 06
                Who are you so offended at?
              2. +8
                28 November 2025 13: 02
                Quote: Dedrusav
                You are simply a provocateur, judging by your posts and pressure.

                He simply expressed his opinion, what is the provocation, in your opinion?

                Quote: Dedrusav
                It's none of your business who believes in what,

                The person you're opposing didn't intrude on freedom of conscience and religion. Your opponent merely expressed the opinion that everyone should return to faith in God—that's his opinion...

                Quote: Dedrusav
                There is no need to engage in aggressive preaching here while simultaneously humiliating people

                I also didn't see any sermon in your opponent's comments. Even less so any personal humiliation. Regarding the latter, I'd really like to see a precise reference to the place in the text where you believe such humiliation occurs.

                Quote: Dedrusav
                smarter and more reserved than you

                You clearly don't demonstrate restraint. Measuring your intelligence is impossible, but excessive emotionality isn't the best sign of high intelligence.

                Quote: Dedrusav
                than you, all sorts of tsar-worshippers and bun-crunchers

                Overall, I must admit that we do have citizens who fit into the category you described. This is a separate and important topic; I often address it myself when I need to point out negative trends in social development. However, not all believers are monarchists and admirers of the fictitious embellishments of pre-revolutionary Russia. Moreover, monarchists generally have a poor understanding of Christianity, which is, in fact, socialist, even communist, and not monarchist at all. However, this is a very broad topic, so I'm not prepared to expand on it here. But that's not the point: I haven't seen any signs that would lead you to classify your opponent as specifically belonging to this category of believers. This doesn't mean he doesn't belong to this group, but there's no basis for claiming that he does.

                Emotion is a very poor advisor. Only strict logic provides correct answers.

                Quote: Dedrusav
                Did your servile ideology help many in the Russian Empire?

                The Russian Empire collapsed due to the decay of the aristocratic elite—or, so to speak, the middle ranks. This was well demonstrated by Mikhalkov in his film "Sunstroke."

                I still don’t understand what “servile ideology” you are talking about.

                Incidentally, the USSR's collapse wasn't due to any hostile forces... it collapsed under the weight of its own organizational shortcomings, which were doctrinal in nature. Social thought in the USSR became too ossified too quickly, ceasing its evolution (development). Moreover, the Bolsheviks never succeeded in building a classless society, which ultimately determined the collapse of the Soviet Union. But the party elite wasn't solely to blame for this; the people couldn't handle democracy. It turned out that Marx's theory had been shattered by the reality of life. However, this topic is even more complex than the previous one... so it can't be covered in a commentary format.

                Have a nice day.
                1. -3
                  1 December 2025 00: 39
                  Are you the devil's advocate? What's got you so worked up? Or are you just getting into other people's conversations? The CIA are idiots!
                  1. 0
                    1 December 2025 00: 46
                    Quote: Dedrusav
                    Are you the devil's advocate?

                    Who's the devil, anyway? I just want to know who I'm protecting... laughing

                    Quote: Dedrusav
                    What got you so worked up?

                    Thanks, but I'm fine... you're the one who's having some troubles...

                    Quote: Dedrusav
                    Or are you used to interfering in other people’s correspondence?

                    You're not having a personal conversation here, you're just posting your "bile" in plain text for everyone to see... so no complaints will be accepted. intima For privacy reasons, please write to the recipient in a private message... bully

                    Quote: Dedrusav
                    The CIA are idiots!

                    I'm more concerned about the local idiots... hi
                    1. -4
                      1 December 2025 00: 47
                      You just want to chat. No family, no business, it seems. I don't argue with idiots.
                      1. +1
                        1 December 2025 00: 50
                        Quote: Dedrusav
                        You want to chat.

                        You too, at least laughing

                        Quote: Dedrusav
                        I don't argue with idiots.

                        Recourse to personal attacks is a sign of a lack of arguments and weakness in debate. I understand that there's nothing to say on the topic... and if that's the case, constructive communication won't work.
                        However, objective thinking and a constructive approach are not about you.

                        hi

                        P.S. You write, I'll read it tomorrow...
                      2. -5
                        1 December 2025 00: 54
                        I don't give a damn about Bandarlogs like you...)))
                      3. 0
                        1 December 2025 10: 56
                        It's astonishing how incapable some people are of seeing themselves from the outside. It's truly a case of "they see the speck in someone else's eye, but they don't notice the log in their own."

                        Let me remind "grandpa" that "grandpa" was indignant at the beginning of this correspondence allegedly another site user's offensive writings... while at the same time he himself hung a bunch of labels and poured out a sea of ​​insults...

                        Although, the question arises: "Is he really a grandpa?"... behavior so unworthy of a thinking person is more appropriate for a pimply youth whose life is spent online under fake accounts, which he can pretend to be, whether it's a grandpa or a blonde... laughing laughing laughing

                        All the "fecal matter" you expel in your correspondence here comes from within you. So, the question naturally arises: where do you get all this fecal matter from?
                        Understand already, sick man, your behavior characterizes not me... but you hi
                      4. -1
                        1 December 2025 17: 09
                        You're just a sneaky, cowardly brat, tell me that to my face. Or are you only brave online?
                      5. 0
                        1 December 2025 19: 09
                        Quote: Dedrusav
                        You're just a sneaky, cowardly brat, tell me that to my face. Or are you only brave online?

                        "Wonderful miracle," did you even notice that my full name is mine on my account, and even the photo, albeit in orange tones, is mine
                        At first, I thought I could debate with you, but it turned out to be difficult for you. You clearly lack the education and upbringing. All you can do is be mean. from a fake account...
                      6. -3
                        1 December 2025 20: 50
                        You arsehole, I suggest we meet in real life, not on a fake account. We'll check your balls. And you'll pay for the insult.
                      7. +1
                        1 December 2025 20: 53
                        This is the second time you've suggested this... Where are you?
                      8. -1
                        1 December 2025 20: 54
                        I'm in Moscow. And you, smart guy?....................................
                      9. +1
                        1 December 2025 20: 55
                        AND I.
                        What's your problem with dots?
                      10. -1
                        1 December 2025 20: 56
                        Do you need me to explain everything? Don't you even understand what a short comment is?
                      11. +1
                        1 December 2025 20: 57
                        Quote: Dedrusav
                        Do you need me to explain everything? Don't you even understand what a short comment is?

                        So there is no overload of periods in your short comment? laughing
                      12. -2
                        1 December 2025 20: 58
                        So shall we meet or are you going to keep wiggling your ass like a sailor's boat?
                      13. +1
                        1 December 2025 21: 00
                        Quote: Dedrusav
                        So shall we meet or are you going to keep wiggling your ass like a sailor's boat?

                        This is the third time you've suggested a meeting, but so far there haven't been any details...
                        It's something like a letter "to grandpa in the village"...
                        You haven't even given your first name, middle name, or last name yet... Essentially, you're a fictional character... "Old Man"
                      14. 0
                        1 December 2025 21: 01
                        They seem to be banning me here, Smirnov, so I'm hiding it. I'm Vitaly Roslyakov, author of the 2012 articles. So, does that make you feel any better?
                      15. 0
                        1 December 2025 21: 03
                        Wait, bro, if that's the case, I'll read the articles first. Are they on this site?
                      16. 0
                        1 December 2025 21: 01
                        There's actually a private message here. You can write to me there. Our conversation has already gone beyond commenting on this article...
                      17. -1
                        1 December 2025 21: 04
                        So, you can interrupt someone else's conversation and humiliate them in public, but once the conversation takes a more mature turn, you can immediately do it in private? I get your point right away.
                      18. +1
                        1 December 2025 21: 08
                        Quote: Dedrusav
                        That is, to interfere in someone else's conversation

                        The conversation wasn't private, but public. That is, it was initially put on public display. I wrote about it.

                        Quote: Dedrusav
                        You can humiliate a person in public

                        You also humiliated your opponent in public...
                        My first comment wasn't offensive. Later, I was responding to aggression.

                        Quote: Dedrusav
                        and as soon as the conversation turned more adult, did you immediately send it to a private message?

                        This concerned your announcement of your identity, I wasn’t sure that you were ready to write openly about it.

                        Quote: Dedrusav
                        I understood you right away.

                        No, I didn't understand, and I didn't understand 100%. laughing
                        But I, it seems, explained...
                      19. -1
                        1 December 2025 21: 11
                        I wasn't insulting, I was responding to an insult from the Soviet people, to whom that fruit owed its life. But you all don't give a damn, CIA yes-men. Believe, but don't be arrogant! The same thing about LGBT and Abrahamic people: it's enough to recognize them as the norm, and then they'll make themselves a universal obligation.
                        And you, Mikhailov, are on their side without even listening to others. And you're even being sarcastic. Your mind isn't built for that.
                      20. +1
                        1 December 2025 21: 15
                        I am a Soviet person, a socialist and a communist... and I personally experienced the USSR.
                        Ilya-spb (Ilya) didn't see any insults directed at Soviet people anywhere in the comments. Below is a screenshot of the messages...

                        I'll read the articles in a few days... then, perhaps, a topic for discussion will arise.
                2. +1
                  1 December 2025 13: 47
                  Quote: alex-defensor
                  The people couldn't handle democracy.

                  And it, democracy, a. was, b. began to appear, c. will be?
                  Name a country or society where there was, is, or will be democracy.
                  Each word has a very specific meaning, independent of you. Democracy, translated into Russian, means the power of the people. That's all. And no interpretations are needed, whether yours or anyone else's.
                  Democracy has never existed anywhere, is not present, and is not expected to exist in the foreseeable future.
                  The Union collapsed due to the degradation of the "elites." For them, the goal of building a classless society didn't exist. And not because they didn't know how ("Without theory, we die," said I.V. Stalin), but because they didn't need it. And not because they were against it, but because they didn't need it.
                  1. -1
                    1 December 2025 19: 22
                    Quote: Krasnoyarsk
                    And it, democracy, a. was, b. began to appear, c. will be?

                    Without the will of the people themselves, their high level of education and willingness to sacrifice for the common good - no, it won’t happen.

                    Quote: Krasnoyarsk
                    Name a country or society where there was, is, or will be democracy.

                    Such a country doesn't exist yet. There are countries like Switzerland, where the level of socialization and self-organization among citizens is extremely high, but even there, this enthusiasm only reaches the level of local self-government...
                    That's the problem with the concept of democracy...

                    Quote: Krasnoyarsk
                    Democracy, translated into Russian, means power of the people. That's all. And no interpretations of yours or anyone else's are needed.

                    There are no other interpretations here. Democracy is the power of the people. Power is realized, first and foremost, in governance. So, it turns out, you won't believe it, that the people must be "ready" manage and "capable" to govern. And the people, as practice has shown, are not ready and not capable... en masse.
                    If this is the case, then in any case, a certain community of people emerges from the people—willing and capable. They ultimately give rise to a new elite. This is what happened in the USSR. The Soviet Union was "condemned" by the grandchildren of revolutionaries...

                    Quote: Krasnoyarsk
                    The Union collapsed due to the degradation of the "elites"

                    No, that's not true. Above, I led you to the idea of ​​why it's not so.

                    Quote: Krasnoyarsk
                    For them, the goal of building a classless society did not exist.

                    It existed, from the very beginning. But as practice has shown, this goal is impossible at this stage of human and social evolution. Anyone with experience in public organizations, parties, and so on, will confirm this. Just study the battles between neighbors in any gardening association. Russian citizens are incapable of respecting the rights and interests of others, nor of reaching agreement. All meetings of many public organizations and even parties degenerated into chaos, with participants stubbornly ignoring one another, yet each wanting to speak and be heard in silence.

                    Quote: Krasnoyarsk
                    And not because they didn't know how to do it ("Without theory we will die," I.V. Stalin) but because they didn't need to. And not because they were against it but because they didn't need to.

                    Beautifully written belay
                    1. 0
                      1 December 2025 21: 44
                      Quote: alex-defensor
                      in governance. So, it turns out you won't believe that the people should be "ready" and "capable" of governing. But the people, as experience has shown, are not ready.

                      Forgive me, but you've made a lot of nonsense. The people cannot govern a priori. The people cannot possess information on a national scale, let alone classified information. Therefore, the essence of governance lies in one-man management. Once "the people" nominate a person capable of governing, the people lose their governing function. This function is given to a single person. Yes, there may be an advisory body, but the final word belongs to the leader. And this applies at any level of the administrative apparatus.
                      If you don't understand this, then you don't understand anything about management at all.
                      Once again, the people can "govern the state," exercising their power, only at the moment of electing the leader of the state. But this, too, is a fiction. The people do not choose, for objective reasons, but merely ratify someone else's choice. Whoever the majority votes for will legitimize someone else's (a group's) choice. So what then constitutes people's power, i.e., democracy? It turns out that democracy is a fiction necessary for a small group to seize power over the people.
                      But since you've already cited Switzerland as an example, please give an example of the Swiss people exercising their power. Referendums? Don't be ridiculous. The government would never schedule a referendum without knowing its outcome in advance.
                      1. 0
                        1 December 2025 22: 25
                        Quote: Krasnoyarsk
                        Sorry, but you've just made a bunch of nonsense.

                        Keep your personal assessments to yourself... try to write only to the point.

                        Quote: Krasnoyarsk
                        The people cannot govern a priori. The people cannot possess information of national significance, let alone classified information.

                        Well, I wrote the same thing, but from a different angle.

                        Quote: Krasnoyarsk
                        The people do not choose, due to objective reasons, but only confirm someone else’s choice.

                        This is the principle of "Representative Democracy", as opposed to the principle of "Direct Democracy".
                        In today's world, management is a highly complex science. Without the proper knowledge and skills, management will not be up to par, and in today's highly competitive global environment, this will have consequences...

                        Quote: Krasnoyarsk
                        If you don't understand this, then you don't understand anything about management at all.

                        I understand a lot, but it's not for you to judge the limits of my understanding, especially based on a single comment that a priori can't fully capture my perspective on complex life circumstances. Try not to get too personal, if you can help it.

                        Quote: Krasnoyarsk
                        So what then is the power of the people, i.e., democracy? It turns out that democracy is a fiction necessary for a small group to seize power over the people.

                        Direct democracy is not yet possible. I don't know how exactly it could become possible. The problem is precisely that there is no solution yet. The problem of democracy is also widely debated in legal academic circles precisely because it is not feasible. It seems necessary, but no one knows how.

                        However, when speaking about power and governance, you're assuming an absolute conception of them. But power over a state cannot be held by a single individual, especially over a state as large as Russia. That's why many write about "Kremlin towers," because governance is the result of a complex, coordinated policy among group interests.
                        The state is a legal construct, a legal fiction, just like a legal entity. This is precisely why neither the state nor a legal entity can act independently and directly. Authorized persons always act in their place. Because a person is an object of the real world, and the state (or legal entity) is a legal fiction. Therefore, the state is always under the control of a politically active class (sometimes there may be several such classes).
                        So, attention, there will be “magic” next!
                        There's no need to seize complete power; what's important is to be a politically active class and exert some influence on decision-making and lawmaking within the state. And this form of political activity is precisely what's available to the general population through various forms of public organizations. By "accessible," I mean that Russia's current legislation is more than democratic, and all democratic institutions are accessible both formally and practically... but they're rarely used by the population due to a low propensity for self-organization. I could explain the reasons for the general population's low propensity for organized public activity, but I'm too lazy to write so much...
                        So, to summarize: the people don't need to govern the country entirely, they just need to participate in the process. Today, there are no truly popular parties in Russia. This isn't because they can't exist, but because the people aren't ready to do so.

                        Quote: Krasnoyarsk
                        But since you've already cited Switzerland as an example, please give an example of the Swiss people exercising their power. Referendums? Don't be ridiculous. The government would never schedule a referendum without knowing its outcome in advance.

                        I don't have any "blanks" to give you links to everything I've read and delved into over the years...

                        But I will briefly describe the principles (tools):

                        1. People's cooperation - you can study the experience of the Mondragon Cooperative Corporation yourself.

                        2. Public foundations and crowdfunding technologies – you can study how gerontology is developing in Switzerland. The entire field is the result of popular will. Read about the creation of the first research institute.

                        3. And of course, we can't do without the "classic of the genre": discussion clubs, in which social thought and public organizations (not just political parties) should develop.

                        It's important to understand that it's impossible to be a politically active class without self-organization and financial independence. At the grassroots level, the first task is accomplished through expression of will and commitment, the second by creating public funds.
                        Again, not everyone can, but a significant number of those who are able and ready will determine the national character of the process itself.
                        We don't need revolutions—we need evolution. If a sustainable socialist model is possible, it must be competitive even in a capitalist environment (again, I suggest paying attention to the "Mondragon Crisis Center"). If the new socialist model (construct) is competitive, then revolution will simply be unnecessary. Furthermore, the new model of organizing society itself must be harmonized in a way that reduces the intensity and confrontation between the elites and the people. I have an idea for how to do this, but the commentary format is not suitable for its presentation...

                        It turned out to be a bit of a "gallop across Europe," but what can you do, my answer was already long-winded...

                        In general, I have a whole new concept, but there is no environment for discussing it... and there is none for the reasons described above... hi
                      2. 0
                        2 December 2025 12: 02
                        Quote: alex-defensor

                        Keep your personal assessments to yourself... try to write only to the point.

                        Okay, I'll try.
                        You've written a lot, but I still don't understand where we disagree. Is it this? The first disagreement is...
                        Quote: Krasnoyarsk

                        The Union collapsed due to the degradation of the "elites." For them, the goal of building a classless society did not exist.

                        Quote: alex-defensor

                        It existed initially.

                        Which elite are you talking about? I'm talking about the one under whose rule the Soviet Union collapsed.
                        And I wrote in detail that it was not because there was no theory (without which we would die) and not because the elite did not know how, but because they, the elite, had no need for it.
                        That is why the purpose of construction... did not exist.
                        Quote: alex-defensor

                        Quote: Krasnoyarsk
                        The people cannot govern a priori. The people cannot possess information of national significance, let alone classified information.
                        Well, I wrote the same thing, but from a different angle.

                        No, forgive me, I wrote that, and you wrote that the people couldn't handle democracy. There's a big difference between "can't handle it" and "didn't handle it." A Russian would understand without an explanation, but I'll explain it to you—he's a dude. can not raise what is not there
                        But maybe he can lift 100 kg. I tried, couldn't handle it
                        .
                        Quote: alex-defensor

                        This is the principle of "Representative Democracy", as opposed to the principle of "Direct Democracy".

                        laughing laughing It's like - Woman: - "Just don't hit me, I'll give it to you myself." The result is still the same - she's raped.
                        Quote: alex-defensor

                        In the modern world, management is a complex science. Without the necessary knowledge and skills, management is not

                        Are you kidding me!? I didn't even know that. That's why I insist that democracy is a fiction, a utopia dreamed up by theoreticians like you.
                        Quote: alex-defensor
                        But power over the state cannot be in one hand.

                        Perhaps. Let's figure out what power is. How does it manifest itself? You only have power when people obey you. Whether they do so voluntarily, involuntarily, or under duress. It doesn't matter. The important thing is that they obey. If you, the one in power, make a decision, whether it's your own or one developed by an advisory body, then it must be carried out. And if even one person doesn't obey, and you agree with that, then you don't have power.
                        Quote: alex-defensor

                        So, to sum it up: the people don't need to completely govern the country, they just need to participate in the process.

                        No. The people don't even need to participate in the country's governance; they, the people, are a priori incapable of doing so for objective reasons. Let's leave the people aside for now.
                        Let's talk about power. There's a leader of the state, call him whatever you like—tsar, president, general secretary. All state institutions are accountable and subordinate to him. What is his primary goal in his work? I suppose it's to improve the living conditions of his people. To organize the entire people, through the government, to achieve this goal. But what if the leader, during his reign, worsened the people's living conditions without war or large-scale natural disasters? That's when the people come forward and, based on the results of a referendum, declare him guilty. Then, you're welcome to prison for the duration of your reign. And if the investigation reveals that during his reign, a certain category of citizens improved their lives, while the lives of the rest worsened, then the sentence could be life imprisonment. The leader of state is a person whom the people, through election, hire to govern THE PEOPLE. And the people have the right to evaluate him, in a referendum, based on the results of his work.
                        Everything else you wrote is blatant demagoguery.
                        Quote: alex-defensor

                        In general, I have a whole new concept, but there is no environment for discussing it... and there is no environment for it

                        Or maybe you weren't looking for this environment at all? When someone says the people aren't right, aren't ready, etc., I begin to doubt their intelligence. hi
                      3. 0
                        3 December 2025 21: 07
                        Quote: Krasnoyarsk
                        Or maybe you weren’t looking for this environment at all?

                        I've not only been looking for it, I'm actually working on it right now. Moreover, there are options at the moment. But I'm sorry, I won't discuss this here, nor will I offer my real-life experience of participating in numerous public organizations and political parties since 2012 (as evidence for what I've written). The problem exists, I didn't invent it, and my assessment is one I've personally experienced. And yes, things have started to change recently, but in many ways, it's still a bit off. Again, I won't point fingers at specific organizations...
                      4. 0
                        3 December 2025 21: 11
                        I don't want to get into a long debate, as it's pointless. But I'd still like to ask for an answer to one of your assertions:
                        Quote: Krasnoyarsk
                        No. The people don't even need to participate in the country's governance process; they, the people, a priori, cannot do so for objective reasons.

                        Are you trying to convince yourself this way, or do you want to convince the "people" that they (the people) don't need this? laughing
                      5. 0
                        3 December 2025 22: 23
                        Quote: alex-defensor

                        Are you trying to convince yourself this way, or do you want to convince the "people" that they (the people) don't need this?

                        Did you notice the first part of my sentence -
                        "The people don't even need to participate in the process of governing the country,"
                        and did not pay any attention to the final part of the sentence - "... he, the people, a priori cannot do this due to objective reasons."
                        And if it can't, then it's not necessary. What's unclear about that?
                        Believe me, I have considerable experience managing teams. I've met very smart, competent, and capable SPECIALISTS. Specialists in various fields of human endeavor. But they are very few. And, besides, they are specialists in their own field. Everything else is a dense forest for them, in which they have no intention of finding their way. Having completed their work to a high standard, they return home to their families with a feeling of deep satisfaction, and there, too, they have to fulfill their responsibilities. Do they have time for managing a country? After all, that requires intense mental work, but they've already strained their brains at their jobs. Read Henry Ford ("My Works, My Achievements").
                        He writes there, I'm not conveying it verbatim, but the meaning is accurate - the worker, after the end of work whistle has sounded, must completely forget about work, he must have a good rest in order to work productively tomorrow.
                        To draft legislation conscientiously, you need to sift through a mountain of documents, explanatory notes, and relevant literature. Can a production worker, a manager, a tractor driver, and so on, and so forth, do this practically? Your problem is that you're a theoretical idealist. I'm a practitioner.
                        That's why I've come to the conclusion that a leader of state needs to be trained from school. That is, a special service will secretly monitor all the brightest students across the country. There will be many of them at first, but as they're monitored, many will be weeded out. A candidate doesn't necessarily have to graduate from high school with honors. The main thing is that they should graduate with honors and demonstrate leadership qualities, be a good athlete, and be in excellent health. Then, military service is a must, followed by university, and then work in their field. Then, they should receive military training and be awarded a rank. Participation in "hot spots" is preferable, followed by work in industry. A career without anyone's help. The candidate must go through all the stages of leading a team of people and reach, for example, the position of governor, and then a ministry, or minister. I believe that out of 10000 schoolchildren, by the age of 55, two or three candidates will have reached the finish line. Two people are needed: the leader of state and their comrade. The leader's comrade is always nearby, at all meetings, sessions, trips, etc. What is the comrade for? For all sorts of unforeseen circumstances, but also for illness, vacation, etc.
                        There's no such thing as a science—public administration—and no university with such a department. There's only practical experience in managing large groups of people.
                      6. 0
                        4 December 2025 11: 21
                        Quote: Krasnoyarsk
                        he, the people, a priori cannot do this due to objective reasons

                        No, I immediately noticed and quoted the entire paragraph, as you can see.
                        I believe that you have made a logical and semantic error here, and it lies in the connection you postulated: “He doesn’t want to – he can’t.”

                        If you didn't immediately understand what's going on, let me explain. A person (even just one, as a person) may not be able to, for example, buy a nice, expensive car... but that doesn't mean they can't want one. Moreover, the capabilities of a given person desiring a nice, expensive car may change over time, and eventually they will gain the opportunity. In other words, they will become capable.

                        Right now, the people are absolutely unable to participate in governance. I've briefly described the reasons above, but I assure you I can elaborate on them if necessary. But the people will not stop desiring some kind of justice (the measure of which has yet to be developed), which can only be achieved through the implementation of this very "participation." So, instead of indulging in complacency and trying to convince ourselves that the people can't do this, we must seek a solution. Why? I can, of course, describe it in detail if you don't understand...

                        Quote: Krasnoyarsk
                        Specialists in various fields of human activity. But there are very few of them. And, besides, they are specialists in their own field. Everything else is a dense forest for them, in which they have no intention of finding their way. Having completed their work to a high standard, they return home to their families with a feeling of deep satisfaction, and there, too, they must fulfill their responsibilities. What time do they have to manage the country? After all, that requires intense mental work, but they've already strained their brains in their work. Read Henry Ford ("My Works, My Achievements").

                        Oh, come on, in my arguments with "orthodox" Marxists, you won't believe it, I write and tell them literally the same thing when we get to the dilemma of "the cook and the management of the country" laughing
                        Briefly, I prove to them that only a single (especially capable) cook can really be taught to manage anything.

                        But you, as I understand it, just like these "Marxists", understand "governing the country" as some kind of absolute, I don't even know anymore, maybe you equate the concept of "governing the country" with the ability to be President, or even to be a Monarch... but I am deliberately adding one more word to the subject of discussion - participation In governing the country. "Participation" comes from the word "part," and this addition fundamentally changes the meaning. Yes, not everyone can be taught to govern, let alone a country, but even a municipality. Moreover, do you think our State Duma deputies govern? No. But they participate in this process, although they are quite dependent on it. Our Duma is a real circus, and always has been, even before Putin.

                        When I talk about popular participation in governance, I mean the existence of effective social mechanisms (sometimes called "elevators") for cultivating leaders from among the people. The USSR, by the way, had such a mechanism. And at first, it worked well. But when the "top brass" became overflowing with gerontocrats eager to hold on to power, the mechanism lost its functionality. And yes, it had its shortcomings, and I could describe them at length and in detail, but again, this is not the place for that...

                        Sorry, I didn't read any further. We've got a lot of writing to do, and we need to stop. We need to seek new solutions and meanings in person, gathering with those eager to find and find solutions in discussion clubs across the country... not here, but my eye fell on your last paragraph:
                        Quote: Krasnoyarsk
                        There's no such thing as a science—public administration—and no university with such a department. There's only practical experience in managing large groups of people.

                        And again, your statement is incorrect and inconsistent. There's not just a department, but an entire Academy in Moscow. It's called:
                        The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (The Presidential Academy, RANEPA)
                        ...
                        Oh yes, and one of my higher education diplomas (I have several of them) is from this Academy...

                        Have a nice day.
                      7. 0
                        4 December 2025 11: 29
                        Quote: alex-defensor
                        those who are searching

                        Eh, I was mistaken... of course I meant "thirsty for searching"... well, it happens lol
                      8. 0
                        4 December 2025 14: 29
                        Quote: alex-defensor
                        A person (even one, as a person) may not have the opportunity, for example, to buy a beautiful and expensive car... but this does not mean that he cannot want to buy it. Moreover, the possibilities of this

                        So let us drink to the fact that our desires coincide with our possibilities.
                        Quote: alex-defensor
                        But this will not stop the people from desiring some kind of justice (the standard of which has yet to be developed), which can only be achieved through the implementation of that very "participation."

                        Yes, I know about the desire of simple-minded people to participate in management, i.e., to "steer," while having no idea where they're going or which way to turn the wheel.
                        Those who desire justice, who think they will do everything right and fairly, at the right moment don't know which option to accept; when a decision is made, they will vote for any of the options presented. We know, we've been there.
                        Once again, and for the last time, I tell you, you are an idealist-theorist.
                        Your idealism will dissipate the first time you try to let people take the helm. Academician Sakharov, during perestroika, is a prime example. He was a remarkable nuclear physicist (he was), but he shouldn't have been allowed anywhere near the helm of the state. They let him in—what, an academician!—and he spouted off such utter nonsense that it's time to take a grip on yourself.
                        What does it mean to take part in governing the state?
                        A tractor driver makes a proposal at a village council meeting. If the proposal falls within the village council's jurisdiction, then... a) it may be accepted, b) rejected (by vote). If accepted, does this constitute participation in government? The answer is no. It is participation in the governance of the rural community, nothing more. If the tractor driver's proposal falls outside the village council's jurisdiction, then... a) it will simply be rejected, b) the tractor driver will be ridiculed. In either case, the tractor driver cannot, for objective reasons, participate in government. And this applies at any level, up to the highest state authority, currently the government and the president.
                        Answer one question: who has the right to initiate legislation today? You know the answer.
                        And if you grant this right to all the people? What will happen, can you guess?
                        Our discussion will lead nowhere. For I am a practitioner who has given people control and knows what came of it.
            2. +15
              28 November 2025 07: 42
              Well, you're not going to defend yourself now either. You'll understand that the country has been screwed only when it happens, like it did in 1991.
              By the way, in our city the church operated throughout the entire Soviet era.
              And there's an ideology now. Everything is bought and sold. And now they pray to Mmmona.
              But you didn’t say anything about migrants.
              In the USSR, they talked about a single Soviet people. The country strove for unity. There wasn't enough time. But now they're successfully dividing us. They came up with this idea of ​​some kind of multinational and multi-religious...
              1. -7
                28 November 2025 09: 11
                Migrants, Gardamir, this is a separate topic.

                I'm thinking about a certain cyclicality in history.

                The first Muslim offensive on the outside world occurred in the 8th century. The conquest of North Africa, Spain, and the invasion of France. This was only in the western direction.

                The Second Offensive – late 14th-15th centuries. The fall of the Slavic kingdoms in the Balkans, the fall of Byzantium.

                And now... Are these really some kind of cycles, every 700 years?
                1. The comment was deleted.
                2. +13
                  28 November 2025 09: 49
                  Offensives are one thing. But now they're practically being brought in by force.
                  1. +2
                    29 November 2025 15: 03
                    Quote: Gardamir
                    Offensives are one thing. But now they are almost forcibly brought down.
                    sons-in-law.


                    They are not brought by aliens.
                  2. +2
                    1 December 2025 21: 58
                    Islamization is a state policy of the ruling party and its leaders. Only with patronage and orders from the very top can they perpetrate what's happening in Russia—the "fall of the cross," the "multi-ethnicity" in the education system, starting with kindergarten, the patronage of diasporas, the obstacles to the return of Russian compatriots to their homeland, the "helicopter" distribution of citizenship to Central Asians, the complete impotence of the law enforcement system, which often sides with migrants. And there are many other examples rife online. All of this is happening across the country, which is simply impossible without centralized control of such a process. You might say this control comes from abroad... Then it's even worse—does that mean our country has no sovereignty whatsoever and can do nothing to counter this "external control"?
              2. +1
                29 November 2025 15: 38
                It's not that there wasn't enough time; the idea of ​​forcing people of different nationalities to believe and think they are one nation from above is simply unviable; there's nothing behind it, no foundation whatsoever. People of different nationalities can indeed become one, but that's a spontaneous process, from below, uncontrolled by anyone. But then, on state television, they said, "We are the Soviet people. We are Russians," and then everyone suddenly lost their natural, innate identity and became imbued with it—that doesn't happen.
                1. +1
                  29 November 2025 15: 47
                  You've forgotten that nations can emerge from nothing. Where Latvia now stands, there was Courland. Or, for example, a hundred years ago, there was no Kazakhstan. But if Rossel had succeeded, there would now be a Ural Republic, inhabited by the Ural people.
                  1. -2
                    29 November 2025 15: 55
                    The nation hasn't changed in either Kurland or Kazakhstan; the name means little; the essence remains the same. You can't change a people's traditions by changing their names, or what a mother tells her son in the morning. Of course, this happens all the time—the USSR is a prime example—but the end result is that the Soviet Union is gone, and from its ruins, the Russian state, as it should be, will emerge. For 70 years, they've been chanting about the red dawn, but look—people are flocking to church, and 500.000 people attended the religious procession in Moscow, and a gigantic number in other cities. And if you invite someone to the October Revolution celebrations now, who will show up? Zyuganov and his sons, and a couple of mental patients from this website.
                    Therefore, true traditions live on, sometimes a thousand years after attempts are made to replace them, and it is not so easy to change the national essence, so whether you call the Kazakhs Uralians or Chinese, they will still remain Kazakhs.
                    1. +3
                      29 November 2025 22: 30
                      Quote from: newtc7
                      and on its ruins the Russian state will arise and will arise as it should be.

                      Yeah, a Russian state with Central Asian migrants, poverty among the majority of the population, and savage income inequality. Facepalm. Every time anti-Sovietists criticize the USSR, they end up criticizing themselves.
                2. +1
                  29 November 2025 18: 44
                  And what is a "Russian" by nationality?
                  1. +1
                    1 December 2025 13: 54
                    Quote: fata-morgana
                    And what is a "Russian" by nationality?

                    This isn't a nationality. It's a citizenship – citizen of the Russian Federation.
                    There is no such thing - a citizen of Russia, alas.
            3. +19
              28 November 2025 07: 52
              Quote: Ilya-spb
              How many people came out to defend the USSR in August 1991?
              How much did it cost? First, the State Emergency Committee, instead of quietly arresting traitors, provoked a "Moscow Maidan," doing everything backwards, as if it were a provocation. Then, we were told about democracy; no one talked about capitalism in the "successor of the USSR" for the first few years, and the CIS was even passed off as a renewal of the Soviet Union. So the people were deceived, and then, it turns out, we adopted capitalism, which, coupled with Chubais-style privatization, also robbed the common people, creating newly minted "masters of the country" and an "elite" dependent on the West.
              As for God, priests and God are not the same thing. It seems God has no idea about these "pimps" of faith, who simply make money from religion and have long since abandoned Christ's commandments.
              1. +9
                28 November 2025 08: 04
                "So the people were deceived, and then, it turns out, we adopted capitalism, which, coupled with Chubais's privatization, also robbed the common people, giving birth to newly-minted "masters of the country" and an "elite" dependent on the West."
                As for God, priests and God are not the same thing. It seems that God has no idea about these "pimps" of faith, who are simply making money from religion and have long since stopped observing the commandments of Christ.
                Exactly! It's worth recalling Radishchev's Ode to Liberty here. "...they oppress society in unison."
              2. 0
                29 November 2025 19: 58
                How is this possible? Why did a huge community of intelligent people simply remain indifferent to the fate of their country?
                After all, these same people, now 65-75, who are brimming with patriotism here on the forum, were in their most productive years back then and could, and should, have decided the fate of their country, their state. But all you hear is "Gorbachev betrayed us, Yeltsin drank, Chubais cheated us... and they stole from us too."
                Why didn't they do what they're doing now? Why didn't they save their country?
                1. +1
                  1 December 2025 06: 36
                  Quote: Mask regime
                  How is this possible? Why did a huge community of intelligent people simply remain indifferent to the fate of their country?

                  Firstly, the "vast community of people" back then was worried about "democracy," about Yeltsin, who was delivering speeches from an "armored car" in Moscow. It's as if you haven't grasped what I said in my comment. Secondly, I repeat, there was no talk of capitalism; no one told us that people's power would essentially disappear and the country would be divided up by oligarchs. No one signed up for capitalism; the majority was in favor of preserving the Soviet Union (as evidenced by the results of the All-Union referendum). You, of course, aren't 65-75 now, "children of capitalism." It's good if you're not moonlighting online for bourgeois ideology, sincerely asking questions about what you know only by hearsay...
            4. +3
              28 November 2025 09: 02
              You, enemies of the USSR and the Soviet people, live by your own rules, without even understanding their meaning, and are incapable of proving or justifying them. Countries don't just collapse on their own; they are always destroyed by people. So, during your Perestroika, you forcibly divided the USSR into your evil, anti-Soviet, Russophobic states, against the will of the majority of voters in the referendum on preserving the USSR. And you yourselves acknowledged this as your crime, hence this cowardly nonsense about "the USSR falling apart."
              1. +1
                29 November 2025 15: 12
                You, Soviet people, live by myths. Those you generalize about never considered themselves that way in the national republics; only the elite agreed to such slogans. If you live in fantasies you've created rather than in reality, nothing good will come of it. You build your own house out of sand, and then you're surprised.
            5. +13
              28 November 2025 09: 27
              Quote: Ilya-spb
              Why did it fall apart?

              The main reason for the collapse of the Soviet Union was a systemic crisis of power.
              The authoritarian system led to the degradation of the administrative apparatus: it became mired in bureaucracy, suffered from stagnation, and the irremovability of elites. This ineffective vertical power structure proved incapable of responding to the challenges of the times. Ultimately, it was the actions of senior officials in the republics, seeking to maintain their power under the new conditions, that triggered the Belovezh Accords and the dissolution of the USSR.

              Today, we are witnessing a disturbing repetition of this pattern: the same rigid vertical power structure, the same ossified bureaucracy, and the principle of irremovability of power. What this historical parallel may lead to remains to be seen.
              1. osp
                +8
                28 November 2025 15: 50
                The CPSU was replaced by United Russia.
                The ideology is different, but the principle is the same - a strict monopoly on power.
                And yes, the USSR collapsed not because of military spending, but because of the rotten political elite, personified by the Gorbachev-Yeltsin duo.
                1. +3
                  29 November 2025 16: 33
                  Quote from osp
                  The CPSU was replaced by United Russia.
                  The ideology is different, but the principle is the same.

                  Any worker could go to the company's party committee and bring their issue up for discussion at a party meeting. And there they would ask harsh questions and punish. Who can Ivan Ivanovich go to with his questions now?
              2. +2
                29 November 2025 15: 36
                After the death of the statist Stalin, his plans to reform the country's ineffective governance system and its future development were curtailed. Khrushchev, along with his successor, seized power under the control of a parasitic, uncontrolled party nomenklatura. Since then, our country, at first slowly, then picking up speed, has been derailed. When Kosygin's economic reforms were reversed after the discovery of Western Siberian oil reserves, stagnation set in. The system began to deteriorate due to a negative selection process for the CPSU Central Committee. Professionals could be counted on one hand. Slogans and ideology were used to cover up the actual economic situation, domestic policy mistakes, and the quarrel and confrontation with Khrushchev's China over Stalin's role. In short, we've reached our limits, riding on Stalin's legacy. He intended to remove the party nomenklatura from economic activity and to foster private initiative in the economy, initially developing artels, which had demonstrated good results during and after the war. After Mao, the Chinese took Stalin's plans as the basis for their reforms and achieved success, forcing the West to support them economically.
                1. osp
                  0
                  30 November 2025 02: 11
                  Already under Gorbachev, it seems they began to allow entrepreneurship and cooperation.
                  But where? In the trade and services sector!
                  Which was a fatal mistake, or rather the authorities’ desire to bring out the shadows of speculators.
                  But in the manufacturing sector this was not done.
                  In the sphere of production where there was a lag and shortage of goods, in the sphere of services and trade there were none.
                  For example, sales of building materials, low-rise construction.
                  That would be positive.
          2. +13
            28 November 2025 08: 49
            A joke from the Covid era.
            The husband calls his wife from the store.
            - I'm at the checkout. What should I get?
            -Are you wearing a mask?
            -In a mask.
            -Then take the cash register. laughing lol wassat
          3. 0
            28 November 2025 09: 42
            Why did the Union collapse?
            There are many reasons. You can argue about this until you're hoarse, and everyone will stick to their own opinion. And that's not what this article is about.
            But, hand on heart, we admit that in the 20s and 30s, believers were persecuted, churches were blown up and destroyed.
            Then there was a relaxation. But under Khrushchev, they started jailing priests again. Particularly among the Baptists.
            About the article itself.
            There is a wonderful saying: Don't go to someone else's church with your own rules.
            And everyone should respect this. And whoever doesn't agree with them being foreigners, get out. Kick them out of the country, let them observe their own rules.
            1. osp
              +5
              28 November 2025 15: 54
              The issue there is not the priests, but the fact that under Khrushchev, Stalin's industrial cooperatives and machine-tractor stations were destroyed, which led to the degradation of the village, its stagnation and extinction.
              Take even his "consolidation" of villages, which turned Russian lands into a wasteland even in the center of the country.
              This predetermined the shortage of many goods during the Soviet era.
              By the end of the 80s, a significant portion of collective farms were unprofitable.
            2. +3
              29 November 2025 15: 44
              [quote=Kuznets 55]Why did the Union collapse?
              But during Khrushchev's time, priests began to be jailed again, particularly among Baptists.
              About the article itself.
              There is a wonderful saying: Don't go to someone else's church with your own rules.
              And everyone should respect that.

              Baptists, Pentecostals, Jehovah's Witnesses, Virgin Marys, the White Brotherhood, and others are SECTS. Headquartered in the USA. Drive them out with a dirty broom.
              1. -2
                29 November 2025 17: 20
                Well, I don't quite agree with you. Although I don't want to claim that I'm right.
                In my opinion, the Sect is an organization that has separated from the mainstream. And it is not officially registered.
                Baptists are an officially registered religious organization.
                1. 0
                  29 November 2025 17: 57
                  [quote=Kuznets 55]Yeah, I don't quite agree with you. Although I don't want to claim that I'm right.
                  In my opinion, the Sect is an organization that has separated from the mainstream. And it is not officially registered.
                  Baptists are an officially registered religious organization.

                  I think everyone knows about the case, the last one before the Karabakh war, when a Russian guy from a Siberian village went AWOL from our base there, on the eve of Putin's official state visit to renew the treaty of friendship and cooperation with Armenia. He walked into the first house he saw and brutally stabbed his entire family, including the children, to death. It turned out he'd called home beforehand, after which he looked very strange, like a zombie. It turned out the entire small Siberian village was a veritable nest of Pentecostal Baptists. What do they preach, and where are their owners and headquarters? In the US, I don't remember the state, controlled by the intelligence services.
                  Our people say that 20 years ago, the Americans could implant 3 to 5 personalities into a person's consciousness, switching them using code phrases. Back then, we could implant 2 personalities, but maybe they were being modest.
                  1. +1
                    29 November 2025 18: 05
                    You decide whether it was Baptists or Pentecostals who lived in a Siberian village. These are completely different movements, or sects, in your opinion.
                    I lived among Baptists for many years, a very peaceful people. They didn't even want to serve in the army with weapons, even under the Tsar.
                    They served as orderlies, drivers, etc.
                    Even under the Soviets, they tried to get into the construction battalion.
                    Very peaceful and honest people.
        2. +15
          28 November 2025 08: 28
          The Russian Empire, with its faith in God, collapsed. And so did many other empires. True, that faith was largely false and ostentatious, just as it is with us now.
          1. +1
            29 November 2025 16: 26
            What does our faith have to do with it? The role of the church in preserving the state is great. Without a state, the Russian people will suffer as never before. Was the church responsible for the February Revolution—a coup? The rotten entourage of the weak tsar, the betrayal of his closest circle at the first failures and mistakes, famine, rumors and lies, difficulties and betrayal at the front, and his forced resignation led to the collapse of the Russian Empire. Now it is reliably known from open Japanese archives that the priest Gapon was a Japanese spy who raised the people and provoked the shooting of the crowd on January 9th for a few thousand dollars from the Japanese secret services. Only this can be considered a "+". The Duma and the Constituent Assembly are generally corrupt characters. The British archives tell the role they played in the history of the abdication and collapse of the Russian Empire. For entering the war and winning, we should have received the straits, recognized Spitsbergen, our influence in the Balkans, Central Asia, and More perks. This could be considered a modern-day color revolution.
            The role of the church and its leader in preserving the state during the troubled times of False Dmitry and the expulsion of foreign and Polish occupiers in 1612 was decisive. Even the boyars and merchants who supported the impostors demanded that he convert to Orthodoxy and marry an Orthodox woman.
            The role of the church in family life, what was the birth rate back then? My great-grandmother had 13 children, two of whom died. Land allotments in the rural community were assigned based on the number of people eating. Houses weren't locked, and the worst punishment was expulsion from the community. It's not like today's Dom-2, with all the scum and bitches. Russia was expanding, but now it's shrinking, populated by migrants, with 6,5 million abortions a year...
        3. -3
          28 November 2025 11: 51
          The Bolsheviks didn't ban religion; they even created the Russian Orthodox Church, despite that religion's less-than-stellar history. And despite the efforts of people like you, the state will still be secular.
          1. osp
            +9
            28 November 2025 15: 58
            How many years was the "convinced communist" Boris Nikolayevich in the CPSU?
            About 30 years!
            How many years was he a "militant atheist" and then suddenly became deeply religious?
            What happened to him?
            1. 0
              29 November 2025 16: 34
              The question is, what kind of vertical power structure and system of nomination is this under a "people's" government that such degenerates can become head of state.
              After Stalin's time, the most successful and short-lived government was that of Yevgeny Maksimovich Primakov, Maslyukov, Gerashchenko, and Kulik. They were real professionals and pulled the country out of its misery in six months. Then they were quickly replaced by Stepashin and the good-for-nothing.
              1. osp
                0
                30 November 2025 02: 04
                And look, with one hand, Boris Nikolayevich, while still working in the Sverdlovsk regional committee, signed the order to demolish the Ipatiev House where the royal family was shot, and then shed crocodile tears over this, with the other hand, or the same one, he signed the decree on the construction of the Cathedral of Christ the Savior.
                Or he spent 30 years building a career in a party that he later cursed, banned, and denigrated, and spoke in the US for God to bless America.
                So how did he come to faith and to what faith?
          2. -3
            30 November 2025 01: 25
            Could you tell us more about the not-so-bright history of THIS religion?
            What's so interesting about the history of Orthodoxy, if not its radiant glory? That it united Rus' after the Mongol yoke? That it produced hundreds of Russian saints who were truly unique individuals? That it gave birth to a truly great Russian culture?
            Didn't I notice when our Inquisition burned people, when we organized the Crusades, or when we tried to build a global caliphate? Or that in Orthodoxy, like with some particularly Nazi-minded people (in case you didn't catch it, I'm talking about Abrahams and all that), everyone around us is subhuman? Maybe I missed something in my history course, but I don't recall anything like that.
            Orthodoxy, if anyone bothers to even try to understand it, is about forgiveness, repentance, and, first of all, changing oneself spiritually, and not about bonfires and cutting off heads like some others.
        4. +1
          29 November 2025 01: 07
          If the Bolsheviks fought against Orthodoxy, then how did Patriarch Kirill survive to this day and become Patriarch?
          Church-going, Orthodox Christians in the Russian Empire were not prevented from having their churches destroyed en masse during the Civil War and the 20s. I wonder why?
          1. -1
            13 December 2025 14: 46
            Of course, neither the Bolsheviks nor their modern counterparts, the liberal democrats, can destroy the Orthodox faith. Although both tried very hard, Moscow is called the Third Rome for a reason, so you, like your predecessors, will be unable to do anything to our faith. You will die, but the Orthodox churches and the people who attend them will remain.
            1. +1
              Yesterday, 10: 57
              Therefore, you, like your predecessors, will be unable to do anything with our faith. You will die, but the Orthodox churches and the people who attend them will remain.


              If you have metaphysical questions or statements about faith, consult a psychiatrist or a church. I can only remind you that Islamic Istanbul was once Christian Constantinople. And there are almost no Christians left there. Religion doesn't exist on its own. It's a socio-political process. It has always been imposed by various methods.
    2. +19
      28 November 2025 04: 47
      The emergence of an ideology among the Russian people will be regarded by the authorities as extremism. This has happened before. When the authorities stop being afraid, then such provocations will be banned. Apparently, they haven't gotten there yet.
      1. 0
        28 November 2025 07: 01
        Dear Dmitry, No government, unless it is shared with the people, will ever cease to fear its own people.

        The laws of history are inexorable. Tsarist Russia failed to take them into account. The USSR failed to take them into account.
        1. +1
          28 November 2025 08: 50
          Quote: Ilya-spb
          No government, unless it is shared with the people, will ever cease to fear its own people.

          Where have you seen one like this? belay
      2. -4
        28 November 2025 09: 20
        Good. What ideology? We are so diverse, both geographically and socially, that finding a common ideology for the Russian people is simply impossible.
    3. -1
      28 November 2025 09: 04
      Quote: Ilya-spb
      And we also need to return to faith in God.

      First of all, you need to believe in yourself. Nobodies are not capable of either Faith or action.
    4. -1
      28 November 2025 14: 01
      For example, I believe in Odin and Thor.
      1. +5
        28 November 2025 14: 06
        Well, many people believe in the Torah...
    5. +1
      28 November 2025 14: 04
      If instead of churches they built one drone factory, we would have won long ago.
      1. -1
        28 November 2025 19: 04
        If... Grandma had one thing, she would be a grandpa.

        Don't mix the round with the hard.
        1. +6
          28 November 2025 19: 15
          You mix faith with ideology and everything is ok with you.
      2. -2
        29 November 2025 16: 45
        And why did you win? So that your children can be manipulated, so that nothing can be decided, so that they at least have some kind of future. Or for those who entered the wrong door, bestiality and a miserable existence, while the possessed, perverted, nouveau riche, and morally ignorant will decide what kind of future we will have?
    6. 0
      28 November 2025 16: 24
      Are you asking Russians to believe in a non-Russian god? And by force, too. And then you're surprised by the results...
      1. +2
        28 November 2025 18: 00
        What kind of god do you think is Russian?
        1. 0
          28 November 2025 23: 30
          But according to my statement, you and I have no disagreements. ) That's already encouraging.
          Which one? Do you need it?
    7. -2
      29 November 2025 15: 33
      This site is not allowed to discuss Orthodoxy; it's run by the Communist International, for whom Christianity is one of its main enemies. They were taught about priests as children, and they still live by that paradigm: that priests are Russia's main threat.
    8. 0
      2 December 2025 07: 44
      By this logic, we must restore faith in the Slavic gods, discarding foreign Middle Eastern rituals.
  2. +23
    28 November 2025 05: 02
    Answering the author of the article's question: they will never ban it.
    Books, films, songs—these are the ones that get banned. Reading in general inspires harmful, extremist thoughts.
    But as the indigenous population (which is carried out exclusively according to traditional moral and spiritual values) is exterminated, there will be more and more niqabs and namaz.
    1. +17
      28 November 2025 05: 25
      Quote: Belisarius
      But as the indigenous population (which is carried out exclusively according to traditional moral and spiritual values) is exterminated, there will be more and more niqabs and namaz.

      I wonder at what stage the priests will change into turbans and robes...
      1. +3
        28 November 2025 06: 11
        You can recall the story.

        In the ruins of the Byzantine Empire, in the Balkan countries conquered by the Ottomans, a mass phenomenon was widespread... called apostasy.
        1. +3
          28 November 2025 07: 37
          Massively and “voluntarily” they accepted Islam as followers of the Christian heresy of the Bogomilite in Bosna. In po-golyamata si often ostanalyte sago received a trace of economic (in small danqi) or political (turban or clan) coercion.
      2. +4
        28 November 2025 06: 24
        Quote: Puncher
        I wonder at what stage the priests will change into turbans and robes...

        He'll eat it, but who'll give it to him? I don't think the mullahs need such cadres. They have enough of their own. The priests will work their plots while they still have them. Especially since their golden age has arrived. And after us, the deluge...
        1. +1
          28 November 2025 06: 49
          Quote: Belisarius
          I don't think the mullahs need such personnel. They have enough of their own.

          Oh well, I suppose the brothers in the trade can come to an agreement. Besides, there's no need to build anything; it's already been built and the place is baited...
      3. +2
        28 November 2025 19: 17
        The priests will immediately hit you in all directions when an enemy appears.
      4. -1
        29 November 2025 15: 49
        I'm more interested in how long a country with people who betrayed everything their ancestors passed on to them can survive. And then you're surprised that the USSR collapsed? Why does the world need a country with such a population, perpetually grievous, perpetually hating everyone, perpetually blaming someone else for everything? The USSR's collapse deservedly, very deservedly, and it wasn't the government's fault—power is always merely a reflection of popular sentiment. So, any of you who lived at that time, whether young or mature, can blame yourself for the collapse of the USSR.
        Fortunately, the younger generation - I know this firsthand because I see and talk to a lot of people in their 20s and 30s - is much more sensible, and their priests are not priests but rather clergy, and no one is to blame for their troubles except themselves, which gives me hope that this time it will be different.
        1. -1
          29 November 2025 17: 45
          Quote from: newtc7
          I'm more interested in how long a country can last with people who have betrayed everything their ancestors passed on to them.

          Well, for now, it's holding up despite everything. For example, the punitive organs are in such decline, but even in this state, they're coping quite well. I believe the demobilization of the military in the event of a peace settlement will be a destabilizing factor. They can't be kept there for long, as that risks riots. But even when they return home, they'll bring a host of surprises that will be used to achieve certain goals. For example, raising funds... Considering that 40% of the police are now women, and the severe shortage means there's no one to combat them.
      5. -1
        29 November 2025 17: 03
        In the former Ukraine, everything was already there: Greek Catholic rites, Uniateism, sects, sorcerers, witches. The people became brutalized, a society of beasts. It became easy to manipulate and bully them. People forgot the commandments, the desire for a bright image. Look at the saints and reverends: there are no people there who bought their way in, or who forced their way in by deception or force. There will be no scoundrels or traitors there. What does a priest have to do with it? He's a servant. I recommend at least watching Mamonov's film "The Island."
        1. +2
          29 November 2025 17: 52
          Quote: YES
          In the former Ukraine everything already existed: Greek Catholic rites, Uniatism, sects, sorcerers, witches.

          Oh, as if we didn't have this? Maria Devi Christos, Kuzka, and many, many more.
          Quote: YES
          Man has forgotten the commandments, the desire for a bright image

          Did he know them? Take any large city where Orthodox Christians should be the majority. In theory, there should be more churches than shopping centers, but the opposite is true.
          Quote: YES
          I recommend at least watching Mamonov's film "The Island"

          I watched. A drug addict and adulterer, who could never be branded, has become a saint and now lectures people.
          1. -1
            29 November 2025 18: 50
            Take any large city where Orthodox Christians should be in the majority, and in theory there should be more churches than shopping centers, but the opposite is true.


            The strength of Faith is not in the number of churches or the size of crosses, but in a close-knit community of people who adhere to human values ​​and keep the commandments, at least for each other and their neighbors. Even this is not easy.
            Shopping centers are needed for everyday needs, although some people turn them into a temple.
            A person must answer for himself how to live, why, what to leave behind and what to leave with. It's never too late to do this, and a person is weak; until he gets it, he doesn't care. He didn't even hide his vices. Mamonov tried to answer this for himself, and that's what he filmed.
  3. +16
    28 November 2025 05: 10
    If we rule according to medieval laws, then we begin to live as if we were in the Middle Ages. Moreover, the faith itself criticizes such behavior and can be perceived as "riya"—showing off, performing a good deed not for the sake of the Almighty, but to attract the attention of others. Believers have all the conditions for believing themselves, believing at home; they can go to the mosque, which, I believe, is a pleasant and, most importantly, appropriate place for prayer.
    1. +9
      28 November 2025 05: 33
      Quote from turembo
      we begin to live as if in the Middle Ages

      The science fiction writer Lukyanenko described "regressors" in one book, continuing the Strugatsky brothers' theme of progressorism. Basically, before one civilization planned to reformat a neighboring civilization to its own parameters in the context of promoting friendship, regressors were secretly sent in, lowering that civilization's level of development to zero. Then, progressors were sent in, initiating processes to improve the civilization, but according to their own scheme. What I'm saying is that it seems we've been injected with regressors who are lowering us to the Stone Age, so that we can later be transformed into a version of the state that orchestrated this...
      1. +7
        28 November 2025 09: 33
        Geometers themselves lived by this and fanatically believed in what they were doing, but here there is simply stupid destruction and replacement. There is no reformatting.
        1. +3
          28 November 2025 10: 09
          What an interesting nickname you have...
          Quote: ALARI
          Geometers themselves lived by this and fanatically believed in what they did.

          It doesn't matter. The goal is to incorporate another, distinct civilization into one's own without provoking internal resistance, discontent, or any other excesses.
          Quote: ALARI
          and here there is just stupid destruction and replacement

          No, in addition to the destruction of industry, education and medicine are being destroyed, and the number of people capable of critical thinking is shrinking. Social media and similar systems teach us to think simply, in formulaic ways... We are being reduced to a primitive level, and that is precisely the task of a regressor.
          1. +2
            28 November 2025 10: 29
            Nick is from the same place. The regressors loved those they regressed. They didn't even have feelings like hatred. The foundation of their ideology is friendship, and these people hate us. There's no sign of friendship here.
            1. 0
              28 November 2025 11: 08
              Dear Commander of the Red-Violet Squadron, you're drawing too direct an analogy. I believe the term "regressor" isn't tied exclusively to Lukyanenko's "world of geometers," any more than "progressor" is tied to the Strugatsky brothers' "world of midday." A "regressor" could represent any civilization, and its relationship to the regressed world could be anything.
              1. -1
                28 November 2025 12: 58
                Dear Black Dog, the term "regressionism" was introduced by S. Lukyanenko in his novel "Stars - Cold Toys" and I have never encountered a similar action in relation to any community in any other work.
                And slightly off topic - Where's Billy's map? We need a map. wink
                1. -2
                  28 November 2025 16: 15
                  Quote: ALARI
                  The term "regressionism" was introduced by S. Lukyanenko in the novel "Stars - Cold Toys" and I have never encountered a similar action in relation to any community in any other work.

                  I haven't encountered any either. Lukyanenko logically formulated the institution of progressivism. First comes regression, and only then progression. Frankly, perhaps this is why the progressivists of the midday world were unsuccessful: they tried to steer society onto the "correct path" of development, while that society had already determined its own path and was moving along it through the force of all its members. In other words, Lukyanenko correctly determined that it is impossible to overcome the driving force of society; it must first be destroyed, and only then can the direction along which it should move be shaped.
                  Regarding the post-Soviet situation, I simply noticed the influence of a certain force that is disrupting Russia's development vector in order to subsequently redirect it in a different direction. Hence the analogy with regression. You understand, what occurs to one person will occur to another.
                  Quote: ALARI
                  We need a map

                  Money, money, rubbish...
                  1. 0
                    30 November 2025 10: 53
                    Quote: Puncher
                    Frankly speaking, perhaps this is why the progressors of the midday world did not have success, because they tried to turn society onto the “correct path” of development, while this society had already determined its path and was moving along it with the force of all members of this society.

                    It was not a success only because the authors decided to make the progressives feeble-minded.
                    Quote: Puncher
                    while this society had already determined its path and was moving along it with the strength of all members of this society

                    You have an extreme lack of understanding of how human society develops.
                    Quote: Puncher
                    That is, Lukyanenko correctly determined that it is impossible to overcome the driving force of society.

                    Quote: Puncher
                    it must be destroyed first

                    Logic exited the chat.
                    Quote: Puncher
                    Regarding the situation with the post-USSR, I simply noticed the influence of a certain force that is destroying the vector of Russia’s development in order to give it a different direction later.

                    This force is called capitalism.
                    Quote: Puncher
                    First, regression

                    It doesn't work that way. Once you've driven a society back to the Stone Age, you won't immediately bring it to communism. And who needs all these difficulties if you can improve society from its current level?
          2. +9
            28 November 2025 10: 34
            What's interesting is that what Gorbachev and Yeltsin did was obvious. Now we're all being slowly boiled. And everyone's rejoicing over the warm stuff...
      2. Des
        +1
        28 November 2025 12: 44
        Quote: Puncher
        What I'm saying is that it seems like we've been inundated with regressors who are bringing us down to the level of the Stone Age, so that they can then cultivate us into an analogue of the state that organized this...

        exactly.
      3. 0
        28 November 2025 19: 18
        No matter how much I read Lukyanenko, it's complete crap in my opinion.
        1. +2
          28 November 2025 19: 20
          Quote: Clever man
          No matter how much I read Lukyanenko, it's complete crap in my opinion.

          His early works are good. Although, again, it's a matter of taste.
        2. +1
          28 November 2025 19: 23
          Well, he's basically a children's writer. And there's a lot of plagiarism, of course. It's a long time ago, but there was this FIDO network, and someone called him a pedophile in one Echo. He was very offended.
        3. +1
          30 November 2025 11: 00
          Quote: Clever man
          No matter how much I read Lukyanenko, it's complete crap in my opinion.

          A strictly commercial writer of fantasy fiction. It's hard to expect outstanding work from someone like him.
    2. +1
      28 November 2025 09: 50
      If you rule according to the laws of the Middle Ages, then We begin to live as if in the Middle Ages.

      So, was Feudalism 2.0 cancelled?
  4. +10
    28 November 2025 05: 23
    The Russian authorities must stop any forms

    Holy shit... Every day, there's an appeal to the authorities to stop this, only to find out that they're ignoring it, to put it mildly. Everyone understands perfectly well that this is a deliberate policy of these authorities. So what's the point of "appealing"?
    1. +1
      30 November 2025 11: 02
      Quote: Puncher
      So what's the point of "appealing"?

      "Justice can be knocked on the palace gates only with rifle butts" – V. I. Lenin. But everyone hopes it will come naturally.
  5. +17
    28 November 2025 05: 45
    By performing public prayers in a foreign country, religious fanatics mark the territory they want to seize.
    This must be nipped in the bud.
    It's time for our authorities to wake up...otherwise there will be a massacre.
    1. +13
      28 November 2025 06: 15
      There is an interesting country - India. There are many Muslims there.

      But in India, police beat offenders with sticks for public prayers.
    2. +10
      28 November 2025 07: 47
      These aren't just public prayers. One person is supposedly praying, the other is filming. They say they've already staged a show at the Kremlin and gotten away with it.
  6. -24
    28 November 2025 05: 58
    Regarding niqabs, Russia is a free country and everyone can dress however they want. Some people even wear masks around the city. Or, for example, they wear a cap, a hood, and a scarf. This is not prohibited.
    If we say that a face must always be recognizable, then that would apply to everyone, and that would lead to total control over individuals, as there are already facial recognition cameras in the metro and some cameras in the Safe City system. That means you'll always be under surveillance.
    If we ban only niqabs, it's clear that ethnic groups will be outraged and a wave will erupt, which is dangerous because some people have imported them by the millions. This will be further fanned by Western liberals and the Ukrainians.
    Well, prayers and the like in public places are obviously hooliganism and muftis should convey this to the people.
    1. +13
      28 November 2025 07: 46
      Quote: Totor5
      Regarding niqabs, Russia is a free country and everyone can dress however they want. Some people even wear masks around the city. Or, for example, they wear a cap, a hood, and a scarf. This is not prohibited.

      Why then did they ban niqabs in Kyrgyzstan, and not scarves and hoods? Didn't they think about it?
      1. -10
        28 November 2025 09: 45
        Is Kyrgyzstan part of Russia? Or is it an Asian country with Asian customs and a "semi-kingdom" type of government?
        1. +8
          28 November 2025 09: 58
          Quote: Totor5
          Is Kyrgyzstan part of Russia? Or is it an Asian country with Asian customs and a "semi-kingdom" type of government?

          France, Belgium, Switzerland—are you okay with that? It's also prohibited there. Austria, Denmark, Italy, and the Netherlands are considering it.
          1. -12
            28 November 2025 10: 04
            This isn't about the niqab, it's about the "Act on the Prohibition of Covering the Face in Public Places." Which I wrote about right away.

            As of April 11, 2011, wearing clothing or masks that conceal the face is prohibited in public places, such as streets, shops, museums, public transportation, and parks. This ban does not apply to items of clothing that conceal the face, such as the chador. The ban applies to all citizens, including men and non-Muslims, with the exception of certain circumstances (such as riding a motorcycle or performing work that requires concealing the face) or special events (such as carnivals).
            1. +4
              28 November 2025 10: 10
              Quote: Totor5
              This isn't about the niqab, it's the "Act on the Prohibition of Covering the Face in Public Places"

              Let's give a simpler analogy: Do you think there's a difference between a regular mask and a Hitler mask? Essentially, they're both masks, but beyond their basic nature as masks, the Hitler mask has a purpose other than simply hiding the face.
              1. -15
                28 November 2025 10: 23
                The niqab (Arabic: نقاب‎, meaning "veil") is a traditional women's head covering that covers the face, with a narrow slit for the eyes. It is usually made of black fabric.

                Adolf Hitler was a German statesman and political figure, one of the founders of National Socialism. He started World War II, during which more than 70 million people died, and played a central role in the Holocaust, which killed approximately 6 million European Jews.

                I'm just curious why your motivation is specifically towards the niqab?
              2. -15
                28 November 2025 10: 39
                Can you explain the reason for your hatred of niqabs?
                1. +7
                  28 November 2025 11: 18
                  Quote: Totor5
                  Can you explain the reason for your hatred of niqabs?

                  I don't hate them, and I also don't think it's normal to walk around the city wearing a mask. If it weren't for all the terrorists, I might feel differently. While it's true that it's a religion, the tradition of fully covering the face isn't a mandatory requirement of Islam. The niqab, for example, is outlawed in Azerbaijan, where the overwhelming majority of the population is Muslim. Why is that if it's just clothing? You still haven't answered the question: why do Muslim countries ban it if it's just clothing?
                  1. -13
                    28 November 2025 14: 29
                    Why do I care why the kingdoms ban things? They ban a lot of things. It's their business. They ban a lot of things, like wearing shorts or shaving, so what?
                    Maybe we should ban alcohol, shorts, and skirts in Russia, make separate beaches for women and men, and make everyone wear a headscarf?
                    Russia is not a kingdom, and we don't have a clothing ban. If you don't like people covering their faces, ban them in public places, and that means banning more than just the niqab.
                    But you're specifically concerned about the niqab, otherwise you wouldn't be quietly downvoting. I can conclude that this isn't against the niqab, but rather part of a different kind of hatred. Moreover, the reason is that they're afraid to voice it publicly.
                    1. +1
                      28 November 2025 14: 46
                      Quote: Totor5
                      Why do I care why the kingdoms ban things? They ban a lot of things. It's their business. They ban a lot of things, like wearing shorts or shaving, so what?
                      Maybe we should ban alcohol, shorts, and skirts in Russia, make separate beaches for women and men, and make everyone wear a headscarf?

                      No offense, Totor5, but I think I realized that we, too, have people I was surprised by—watching footage from the US about BLM, where white people fight with the police for black rights and participate in their rallies... Why do you personally need a niqab? Are you the woman who wants to wear it, or is her husband? If so, then I understand and have no further questions for you. Although you could have made a little effort and explained its value, since I simply don't understand it—I'm not familiar with such details. Well, if not, then I've already described it above. It turns out that "Baba Yaga is against it" then...
                      1. -9
                        28 November 2025 16: 22
                        Obviously, I don’t like the fact that people walk around the city in burqas or, for example, masks or with strange beards.

                        But what would be the justification for the ban? Based on what law? I keep asking this. But you're citing kingdoms as examples, or banning everything, not just niqabs, like in Europe. So, the law should just say that the niqab is prohibited. And why? Because it's banned somewhere in Asia. That's a pretty good justification. So what should the law say? What's the motive for the ban?

                        We have a free country and there are no bans on wearing certain clothes or beards, for example, there is no ban on miniskirts and low-cut skirts; girls walk around like shabbi and it's okay. There is no ban on shorts, as in many religious kingdoms, etc.

                        Many people don't like the influx of Islamists into Russia, but the state itself is essentially bringing them here. We don't have visa regulations, and passports are handed out like candy wrappers. Everyone knows that markets and fruit stalls are running AzerbaijanisAliyka spits in our faces, so what? According to Putin, there are more than 10 million migrants, effectively 10% of the country's population, and the majority are concentrated in the capitals, essentially turning this whole place into Moscowbad. And all that's left is to wait for the hour X when it all flares up like BLM.
                    2. +2
                      28 November 2025 18: 03
                      Why are you talking such nonsense? There's no ban on covering one's face here. This is an alien religion, an alien ideology, alien traditions. It was people like you, with words like yours, who destroyed the Soviet Union.
                      1. -4
                        29 November 2025 11: 00
                        "alien religion, alien ideology, alien traditions" ...
                        So what? Are you a Nazi? Only those who share your spirit have the right to live in Russia?
                      2. +4
                        29 November 2025 12: 22
                        So let them live in their own country. Because first they impose their ideology, their traditions, their religion. And then they'll ban everything we do and you won't be allowed to ask this question.
                      3. -4
                        30 November 2025 15: 17
                        Well, first of all, they can live here from the start. Russia isn't just Slavs. Even Moscow isn't just Slavs. And to prevent uncontrolled migration, we need to introduce visas and let in only the right people, not just everyone from the CIS.
                      4. +3
                        30 November 2025 15: 24
                        Quote: Totor5
                        We need to introduce visas and let in those who are needed, and not everyone from the CIS.

                        Actually, visa-free entry doesn't mean everyone can enter without inspection. A visa regime wouldn't really change anything here; those who import all sorts of things, as they say here, will get visas without any problem.
                      5. -2
                        30 November 2025 15: 33
                        They board the train and travel – quite freely. And what's more, these are people with criminal records. Why the hell are they here?
                      6. +1
                        30 November 2025 15: 35
                        Actually, there should be a document check at the border, and anyone who doesn't pass it is removed from the train.
                  2. -8
                    28 November 2025 16: 31
                    Muslim countries ban religious clothing because they don't want competition between the official religion and the authorities based on it. In Russia, the state is separate from the church, and Russia is a secular, liberal country. Therefore, it's difficult to ban a specific type of religious clothing without a reasonable justification. The only approach here is to impose a blanket ban on everything, as in Europe.
                    But maybe we should just start by stopping treating the country like a public thoroughfare.
                    1. +2
                      28 November 2025 16: 43
                      You are both right and wrong.
                      Quote: Totor5
                      But maybe we should just start by stopping treating the country like a public thoroughfare.

                      You're right about that... but in other respects, the niqab and the like ultimately hinder the assimilation of migrants—you see? They remain a distinct group in society, to some extent opposing it, and that's always bad and a "time bomb," since for them, it may turn out, what matters more is what their "spiritual father" and "brothers" say, and not the laws of the country where they now live—have you ever considered that? After all, you're the one talking about laws... And regular masks don't have that effect, not at all.
                      1. -4
                        29 November 2025 10: 56
                        We don't ban segregated groups. Here, people can wear whatever they want, listen to whatever they want, and so on. That's the difference from Asia. Wearing clothing that covers the face isn't prohibited here. Therefore, like in Europe, the only option here is to push through a ban on covering the face in public places, as they did in Europe. But we still need to think about how to implement it—there are masks for running, there are masks for couriers, there are medical masks, and there are beanbags. And our climate isn't exactly warm. So, it's likely that balaclavas and niqabs will be banned, which will cause some unrest. And to avoid that, we need to ensure hygiene in our immigration policy, and right now, hygiene there is like in a train station toilet.
                      2. +2
                        29 November 2025 12: 49
                        Quote: Totor5
                        We don't ban segregated groups. Here, people can wear whatever they want, listen to whatever they want, and so on. That's the difference from Asia. Wearing clothing that covers the face is not prohibited.

                        Well, I'm telling you about the problems of assimilation, which are global, and you're just telling me that there's no such law... well, they'll pass one - then everything will be fine with you? laughing
                      3. -2
                        30 November 2025 15: 20
                        I think I've already written everything, why keep repeating it one by one?
                        If they do introduce it, it won't just apply to niqabs, but to many other things. But personally, I don't wear balaclavas in the city.
                    2. +3
                      28 November 2025 17: 32
                      I think at some point we'll be surprised at how easy it is, with or without justification.
                  3. 0
                    30 November 2025 15: 27
                    Quote: Level 2 Advisor
                    I also don't think it's normal to walk around the city wearing a mask of some kind.

                    What about the period of corona madness? laughing
                    1. -1
                      30 November 2025 15: 37
                      Well, it was forced. Even in Europe, it's written that covering one's face is prohibited, followed by a list of exceptions. For example, it's obvious that couriers and motorcyclists are allowed.
    2. -14
      28 November 2025 11: 26
      Why can't I pray in public, or do a religious procession?
      It is my right to turn to God at any moment.
      Let's also ban talking in public places, that causes so many problems!

      Why can’t I wear, for example, a shamanic mask, a niqab, etc.?
      All of this was our inalienable right, but now it’s supposedly starting to interfere with something...
      If the police need to identify me, they can easily come up to me and ask for documents.

      And they ban it in order to maintain total surveillance and control.
      How much can you tighten nuts?
      Will I be banned from running on the streets tomorrow?
      For OB purposes, of course...

      We are not slaves. Slaves are not us.
      1. +5
        29 November 2025 01: 37
        Why can't I pray in public?


        Pray at home. We don't need your claims about how incredibly religious you are. Make such religious declarations in your apartment to your relatives. We Russians don't need you and your prayers on the street.
  7. +11
    28 November 2025 06: 16
    What's the problem with introducing an article into the criminal code? We all know how our Duma passes laws in 15 minutes, on the first reading. When they need to or when they're ordered to do so by higher authorities. Like in 2022, for example, when mobile phones were available and the penalties for those over 500 had to be immediately increased. And now they've been dragging their feet for years...
  8. +31
    28 November 2025 06: 16
    The country has been turned into a cesspool into which all the Wahhabi filth from Central Asia is dumped. It's foolish to appeal to the authorities and the system that deliberately pursue such a policy.
    1. -1
      28 November 2025 10: 26
      Or maybe we should just introduce visas and not hand out passports left and right?
      1. +3
        28 November 2025 17: 33
        Can you introduce them? Or make someone introduce them?
      2. +1
        30 November 2025 11: 13
        Quote: Totor5
        Or maybe we should just introduce visas and not hand out passports left and right?

        Are you some kind of extremist, a CIP-ist, a foreign agent, who decided to destroy the businesses of respected people?
        1. +1
          30 November 2025 15: 31
          I don't like it when terrorists, drug addicts, rapists and inadequate people can just come to Russia and stay there for years, wandering around the country.
  9. +2
    28 November 2025 06: 34
    Be that as it may, everyone discussing such a matter primarily considers their personal safety and the safety of their families. Those who don't care have their own bodyguards, bodyguards for their families. Take all this away, and the nouveau riche will switch to our side and will also be outraged by such phenomena.
  10. +17
    28 November 2025 06: 50
    We're kind of on the outskirts here and there aren't many SA brothers, but I recently encountered this myself. I went to the Ozon checkpoint to pick up a package, and there was an Ozon courier praying right in the customer area. What should I do? Should I punch him in the face? They'll call me a faggot and pack me up, even though I'm not Russian at all. I just stepped over him and went to pick up my package, and the locals stood by the wall waiting for him to finish. It's more a matter of mentality. He came to this checkpoint like a conqueror and is praying so the infidels can hang out on the side. If people were to step over him and do their business peacefully, he'd probably feel infringed and start a fight. Then the cops would have no choice but to charge him with hooliganism. He didn't dare jump, I weigh nearly 120 kg and am 190 cm tall.
    1. +9
      28 November 2025 08: 31
      Next time, give him a rag. Honey, are you mopping the floors? Wipe this down here. But of course, in a situation like this, they need to be restrained if the circumstances allow. At the very least, film them with their faces and post them in local chats and media. The prosecutor's office is monitoring them, and the public will demand punishment and deportation.
  11. +27
    28 November 2025 06: 54
    For now, we have "Akhmat power," and the police are powerless. Under this government, there's no prospect of change.
  12. +13
    28 November 2025 07: 40
    We're experiencing massive population decline! Young people don't want families or children. We have a lot of young people in the workforce, frightened by uncertainty, low wages, and a lack of confidence in the future. All these social programs aren't working properly, and a few brave souls with many children don't make a difference. Our territories are vast, and soon there won't be anyone left to live there. To remedy this, we're bringing in migrants, and we need to create every possible environment for them to stay and reproduce like cockroaches. For example, don't draft them into war.
    Therefore, the answer to the author is never!
    1. 0
      29 November 2025 17: 25
      Quote: Vadim S
      We're experiencing massive population decline! Young people don't want families or children. We have a lot of young people in the workforce, frightened by uncertainty, low wages, and a lack of confidence in the future. All these social programs aren't working properly, and a few brave souls with many children don't make a difference. Our territories are vast, and soon there won't be anyone left to live there. To remedy this, we're bringing in migrants, and we need to create every possible environment for them to stay and reproduce like cockroaches. For example, don't draft them into war.
      Therefore, the answer to the author is never!


      Our government isn't sovereign; it operates according to the same scenario as Europe. It's driven by greed and the desire for profit at any cost. It doesn't care who works for its well-being, as long as it doesn't threaten its interests. And with the help of foreigners, the population can be further divided. To make exploitation easier, otherwise they'll start asserting their rights. In short, they're brutalized by the media and turned into modern-day slaves. They always remember Vanya when war comes.
  13. NSV
    +6
    28 November 2025 08: 19
    And the authorities listen to everything and eat...
  14. +7
    28 November 2025 08: 26
    The state is in disarray. The swan, the crayfish, and the pike rule Russia.
    1. +7
      28 November 2025 09: 41
      [quote=Million]The state is in disarray. The swan, the crayfish, and the pike rule Russia.[/quote]
      More likely mediocrities and saboteurs. sad
  15. +9
    28 November 2025 08: 31
    Well, what's there to be surprised about?
    Singer Dolina (Kudelman) managed to screw over the Russian Federation's justice system. And then there's the entire Muslim world...
    1. -9
      28 November 2025 11: 39
      Quote: Million
      Well, what's there to be surprised about?
      Singer Dolina (Kudelman) managed to screw over the Russian Federation's justice system. And then there's the entire Muslim world...

      For those who don't understand, there was also a court practice of returning apartments to old ladies. BEFORE Valley. Starting in the early 2000s, buyers and resellers often got screwed by such old ladies, as well as by maintenance contracts. Naturally, it worked the other way too...
      It's just that it's become widespread now. Advertising...
      They will introduce insurance and/or housing return only after the money is returned - and everything will calm down
      Notaries are trying to get away with it, insisting on notarized housing purchase agreements. They're really getting in the way of contracts in simple written form.
  16. +20
    28 November 2025 08: 37
    There are millions of migrants from Asia and the Caucasus in Russia. Our hostages are imprisoned in Azerbaijan, a hint that their diaspora shouldn't be touched. Why wasn't the Azerbaijani who attacked the police shot on the spot? Then Putin would have rewarded them and praised them. And everyone who needs to, who carries a knife, would have understood.
    But Putin travels to all these countries where those who have sworn allegiance to ISIS come to us, assuring their leaders of eternal friendship. The Tajiks carried out a horrific terrorist attack in Crocus City – what were the consequences? Did Tajikistan pay at least a million rubles to the victims? No way! He didn't even apologize for his compatriots (correct me if I'm wrong). Even mice don't fear or respect Leopold the Cat!
    1. +10
      28 November 2025 09: 56
      By the way, I remember well how the Russian "elite" reared up when Batka grabbed that crook Baumgertner by the ass; the stench was sky-high. And here the Russians have been sitting here for so long – and everything is quiet and smooth.
    2. +5
      28 November 2025 12: 59
      Even mice aren't afraid of or respect Leopold the Cat!

      Yeah, it's disgusting how he grovels before these Asians. He'll wait and bring the country to the point where they'll do the same as Gaddafi...
  17. +13
    28 November 2025 08: 40
    [quoteKWhen will Russia ban niqabs and begin more aggressively punishing those praying in public?][/quote
    I think never, since the Kremlin towers prioritize "pilaf festivals" in their domestic policy.
  18. +9
    28 November 2025 08: 46
    Biryukov, abandon your naivety! In Kyrgyzstan, a Kyrgyz policeman fines a Kyrgyz woman, and try objecting! For clan will go against clan, tribe against tribe! But here, the fine will be given by a despicable kafir policeman—that is, an Orthodox Russian, without clan or tribe. Therefore, by their standards, he's a nobody, a void, defenseless. Meanwhile, a Russian is, by definition, a scoundrel, a "great-power chauvinist" who oppresses small nations, yet is obliged to be their servant, an expendable resource of history, not even having his own republic in the federation. Allah himself commanded that such a pathetic person be stabbed!
    How many nations and nationalities do we have? And even the smallest nationality has autonomy within clearly defined territorial boundaries and its own government, defending its interests vis-à-vis the federal center. And its own clan within these boundaries. Be it the Khanty or the Mansi. Be it the Komi or the Mordvins. Where is the Orthodox Russian Republic? Ah, there isn't one! Well then, you can stage "The Nutcracker" in the Cathedral of Christ the Savior! You think this is a joke? Tickets are sold! Try staging a ballet in a mosque! In a mosque that is very much in favor of niqabs. And you – fine people for niqabs!
    1. +1
      28 November 2025 09: 26
      Quote: depressant
      Well then, we can stage "The Nutcracker" at the Christ the Savior Cathedral! You think it's a joke? Tickets are on sale!

      Well, fine... no need to be so obscurantist. The Nutcracker is a beautiful Christmas performance. Don't see debauchery and adultery in the dancers' beautiful legs. Everyone thinks to their own degree of depravity, and Islam demonstrates this depravity.
    2. +3
      28 November 2025 10: 30
      It all depends on who rules the country. There was a Tsar named Feodor Alekseevich, Petya's older brother. In those days, people were divided not by nationality, but by faith: Orthodox or Tatar. So Feodor Alekseevich issued a decree that if you wanted to be a bey, a khan, or a Tatar prince, you had to convert to Orthodoxy. If you didn't convert, you'd go from prince to serf.
    3. +5
      28 November 2025 16: 41
      Well, if the Church has a concert hall where they sing and have parties, why not The Nutcracker? I'm not a believer, by the way, but concerts have no place in a church, in my personal opinion.
    4. +3
      28 November 2025 18: 29
      Do you honestly think the Khanty and Mansi have any say in the Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug? They only make up 1.5 percent combined. In all four of our remaining autonomous okrugs (six have lost their status), the population is predominantly Russian, and the Khanty, Mansi, and Nenets are either completely irrelevant to the government or hold purely symbolic positions. Incidentally, in the Komi Republic, Komi only make up a fifth of the population; Russians are far more numerous, including among the leadership. And in Karelia, Karelians, Vepsians, and Finns make up less than a tenth of the population, while in Khakassia, the Khakassians make up the same proportion.
      1. +3
        28 November 2025 19: 48
        Do you honestly think the Khanty and Mansi have any say in the Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug? They only make up about 1.5 percent of the population combined.

        But even with such small numbers, these ethnic groups are endowed with their own ethnic territory and have a government obligated to defend their interests vis-à-vis the federal government. However, you correctly noted that the local ethnic groups in some autonomous entities are too few in number, which fuels their nationalist sentiments and leads to the persecution of Russians. Haven't you heard of this? The Khanty and Mansi have their own human rights activists who demand the expulsion of Russians, at least from administrative positions. And what about larger ethnic groups? Try finding a Russian administrator in Chechnya! Expulsion has already taken place there. The small percentage of the local ethnic group in no way diminishes the degree of their nationalism toward Russians. Quite the contrary.
  19. BAI
    +7
    28 November 2025 08: 49
    When will Russia ban niqabs and begin more aggressively punishing those praying in public?

    Never. And I don't even need to explain why.
  20. +19
    28 November 2025 08: 49
    Judging by Putin's latest statement: "We must ensure that the topic of migrants does not irritate Russians," there is strict censorship of information about migrants' offenses.
    1. +11
      28 November 2025 09: 03
      This has been a long-standing practice. If the news doesn't provide the criminal's first name, last name, or nationality, it's clear the crime was committed by a non-Russian.
      An example is precisely with this Azerbaijani. Not a single news report wrote anything other than that he is a teenager.
      1. -2
        28 November 2025 10: 23
        Mailru wrote that same day where he and his family had deigned to arrive from.
        1. +3
          28 November 2025 10: 31
          But Lenta.ru didn't write about it. Unless you can see the brunette in the video.
          1. -7
            28 November 2025 11: 47
            Quote: Million
            But Lenta.ru didn't write about it. Unless you can see the brunette in the video.

            You just beat your chest - that no one wrote
            Quote: Million
            Some news reports didn't write anything except that he was a teenager.
            - and it turns out they write
            "An Azerbaijani teenager stabbed a security guard for asking him not to pray.
            During his arrest, he attacked police officers.
            https://www.trud.ru/article/24-11-2025/1761081_podrostok-azerbajdzhanets_porezal_oxrannika_za_prosbu_ne_delat_namaz.html?ysclid=miimbj4uy623753429
            1. +5
              28 November 2025 12: 00
              I don’t have that much time, nor the desire, to look for detailed information about the criminal.
              I only know one thing: if it was not indicated, then, with a high degree of probability, he is not Russian.
              I have never come across the newspaper Trud on the Internet.
              I'm glad for you that you have the time and desire to figure this out, you're such a principled person.
              1. -8
                28 November 2025 12: 12
                Quote: Million
                I have never come across the newspaper Trud on the Internet.

                Why would that be? The old newspaper, with its history, never closed.
                Or is it the same as with "they didn't write it anywhere"??!!!

                Quote: Million
                I only know one thing: if it was not indicated, then, with a high degree of probability, he is not Russian.
                Not a single cabinet arsonist's nationality was immediately recorded at the military registration and enlistment office. Only after some time had passed and they were convicted did you notice the face was local.
                But you once again failed to notice that Russian criminals also do not indicate their full name or nationality.


                Quote: Million
                I'm glad for you that you have the time and desire to figure this out, you're such a principled person.
                - When people drag an owl onto a globe - as you do in this case - I always find time to check whether it's true or not.
                1. 0
                  28 November 2025 12: 17
                  It has been pulled up a long time ago, only some principled people do not notice it.
                  1. -9
                    28 November 2025 12: 24
                    Quote: Million
                    It has been pulled up a long time ago, only some principled people do not notice it.

                    I was in Moscow in August - compared to 5 years ago, there are practically no Central Asians.
                    Moreover, Indians are working as couriers (previously a very profitable job for the fighters) because the Tajiks have left...
                    This is the trick of the Muscovites.
                    1. +2
                      28 November 2025 12: 58
                      It depends on which area of ​​Moscow you visit.
                      1. -9
                        28 November 2025 13: 02
                        Quote: Million
                        It depends on which area of ​​Moscow you visit.

                        It doesn't matter - they were everywhere back then, the metro was packed to the brim with them during the day. And now I'm on the metro at 7 a.m. with my bag and just sit there.
                        There was only one Tajik courier, the rest were Indians and blacks.
                      2. 0
                        28 November 2025 17: 53
                        And although everyone has already decided everything for themselves, the sarcasm is so-so...
  21. +12
    28 November 2025 08: 53
    How much longer can you keep flailing your nose back and forth? The niqab is not Muslim clothing! It's the clothing of Muslims, or, more accurately, fanatics and extremists masquerading as Muslims! It's high time to ban it and punish it harshly!
    1. -1
      28 November 2025 10: 24
      Originally Assyrian.
  22. +7
    28 November 2025 09: 03
    An Azerbaijani man decided to pray in a shopping center on Orekhovy Boulevard in Moscow and, after a security guard forbade him from doing so, stabbed him with a knife.

    I only have questions for those who allow religious fanatics into our country. The last thing these "patriotic" officials care about is their homeland.

    And it's time to decide. Are we a secular country or a religious one? Because formally we are secular, but we live like a religious one. And not just religious, but specifically Muslim.
    1. +5
      28 November 2025 10: 00
      Yeah, and how does Islamic banking fit into the concept of a secular country?
    2. +2
      30 November 2025 11: 23
      Quote: Stas157
      And not just religious, but specifically Muslim.

      Once the Central Asians are gone, they'll import blacks and Hindus, and the problem will be solved immediately. We'll have Hinduism, Sikhism, and shamanism. laughing
  23. +16
    28 November 2025 09: 13
    They will ban it under another president, this anti-Russian one.
    1. +8
      28 November 2025 10: 05
      Unfortunately, the closest candidates, Dyumin and Mishustin, are the same.
      1. +2
        28 November 2025 10: 34
        The people must regain power.
      2. +4
        28 November 2025 16: 31
        Quote: Gardamir
        Unfortunately, the closest candidates, Dyumin and Mishustin, are the same.

        I may be wrong, but I personally have the impression that we've been implementing collective governance for some time now, meaning the president's role is nominal, a mere puff piece. Like the "unknown fathers" in the Strugatsky brothers' "Inhabited Island." All this talk and hints about 150 years, supposedly being possible... and all that. They're feeding us the idea that life expectancy can be extended to 150, thereby justifying VVP's rule for another 60 years, claiming science has succeeded... Meanwhile, you can trade doubles for triplets and quarters.
        1. +1
          30 November 2025 11: 26
          Quote: Puncher
          They are throwing at us the idea that it is supposedly possible to extend life to 150 years.

          It's just pure nonsense to distract people from their problems. Anything but politics and economics.
  24. +13
    28 November 2025 09: 15
    We have a law prohibiting public displays of religiosity. Why it's applied only to the wearing of Orthodox crosses is a question.
    1. +1
      28 November 2025 11: 39
      This guy with the scales rules here.
  25. +8
    28 November 2025 09: 28
    I'll put it more bluntly.
    The millions of Muslims arriving in our country from Central Asia are not peaceful migrant workers in the usual sense of the word. They are occupation forces, called upon to replace us, Russians, throughout the entire territory of Greater Russia, without displacing our small nations. They intend to replace us and build their own state, where ours currently exists. And as history shows, religion is one of the most powerful tools for building a new state. By performing public prayer in the wrong place, and by wearing the niqab, they thereby mark our territory as their own. What was yours is now ours. And all these plov festivals, all these thousands-strong prayer services in the center of Moscow, all these games with dead animals in our fields (I was surprised to learn of this), the public slaughter of sacrificial rams – all of this is permitted! But our religious processions, as a symbol of Russia's belonging, including to us, Russians, have provoked deep discontent in the Presidential Administration and attacks in the press. By denying us the right to our religion, we are denied the right to our state.
    1. 0
      30 November 2025 11: 29
      Quote: depressant
      These are occupation troops who are called upon, without replacing our small nations, to replace us, Russians, on the territory of all of great Russia.

      Nonsense. They're creating economic competition for all other nations in the same way. Capital doesn't care who works in the factories and construction sites, as long as it's cheaper. That's why they bring in migrants: as cheap labor and to put pressure on the labor market by forcing locals to work for pennies.
  26. -3
    28 November 2025 09: 31
    Quote: Dedrusav
    You're nothing but a provocateur, judging by your posts and your urgency. It's none of your business what people believe. There's no need to engage in aggressive preaching while simultaneously humiliating people who are smarter and more reserved than you, all those tsar-worshippers and bun-crunchers. Did your servile ideology help many in the Russian Empire?

    My God, so much hatred, so much aggression... Did they offend you in some way? Did they insult you in some way?
    Or does the mere mention of Orthodoxy and faith in God make you cringe?
    So, let me draw your attention to the fact that Orthodoxy has a history spanning over a thousand years. It is Orthodoxy that has shaped the mentality of the Russian people, meaning that it is, at the very least, the cornerstone of our Russian national identity. This is a fact, and you will have to accept it.
    As for communist ideology... it dominated the territory of the Russian Empire for less than 100 years, which is somehow insignificant compared to Orthodoxy... Besides, as you were rightly pointed out, in 1991 no one came out to defend this ideology. But that Russian Soldier, a young man, refused to remove his cross and was killed for it by Chechen fighters... You must admit, this makes you think... However, to you, that soldier was probably a crazy fanatic?
    1. +3
      28 November 2025 09: 53
      Dear Sergey Olegovich, I will support you!
      There are no atheists on the battlefield!
      Those present, you don’t know this?!?
      Have you forgotten the video where the unit kneels before an operation, and the elderly priest prays? Everyone is on their knees! And they fervently repeat the words of the prayer after the priest. Even those who have never attended church...
      We're all on LBS now. You leave your house in the morning, and sooner or later, during the day, you find yourself confronted by an adversary who intends to replace YOUR state with THEIR OWN by displacing, or even killing, you. They're already displacing you from the playgrounds.
      1. -1
        28 November 2025 11: 37
        "There are no atheists on the front lines!"
        But, for example, I will quote: “A communist who calls on God looks pathetic.”
      2. +5
        28 November 2025 21: 08
        Quote: depressant
        There are no atheists on the battlefield!
        Yes, I personally saw a video of a veteran who said exactly that.
    2. 0
      29 November 2025 03: 10
      In 1991, no one came out to defend this ideology. But that Russian Soldier, a young man, refused to remove his cross and was killed for it by Chechen fighters...


      If Orthodoxy has a 1000-year history, then why didn't the 99% church-going people of the Russian Empire come out to defend the Church after the Revolution? Why?
      Need I remind you that tens of thousands of communists were killed by "civilized" Germans for being communists? Incidentally, those same Germans had "Got mit uns" written on their belt buckles. Translate it yourself. From German.
      1. -2
        29 November 2025 19: 30
        It's written on the dollar bill too. Do you trust the dollar bill? Or the buckle?
        1. 0
          1 December 2025 09: 01
          Do you believe in church-going believers who have never even held a Bible in their hands?
    3. +1
      30 November 2025 11: 32
      Quote: Abrosimov Sergey Olegovich
      As for communist ideology... it dominated the territory of the Republic of Ingushetia for less than 100 years, which is somehow insignificant compared to Orthodoxy...

      Science, medicine, education, industry, space, nuclear energy, electrification of the entire country, universal education. Not serious? Okay.
    4. +1
      30 November 2025 11: 34
      Quote: Abrosimov Sergey Olegovich
      Moreover, as you were rightly pointed out, in 1991 no one came out to defend this very ideology.

      And who came out to defend your ideology in 1917?
  27. +6
    28 November 2025 09: 33
    Quote: Ilya-spb
    And the Bolsheviks fought against Orthodoxy. They spread and cultivated atheism.

    In 1944... on Stalin's initiative, a Patriarch was elected...
    1. 0
      30 November 2025 11: 36
      Quote: alexputnik17
      In 1944... on Stalin's initiative, a Patriarch was elected...

      So? Was dialectical materialism immediately abolished in the USSR?
  28. +7
    28 November 2025 09: 35
    "When will Russia ban niqabs and begin more aggressively punishing those praying in public?"
    Never, Author.
    I read the news this morning that negotiations are underway with the non-terrorist Taliban about importing their "hardworking specialists" for agricultural work. The country is turning into a huge migrant dump, and yet we're still making fun of the West about it.
    1. 0
      28 November 2025 10: 29
      The average Afghan is 25 times more likely to commit violent crime than the native-born.
      1. -11
        28 November 2025 11: 50
        Quote: Anglorussian
        The average Afghan is 25 times more likely to commit violent crime than the native-born.

        With our 980,000 crimes in 2023? Well, well...
        1. 0
          28 November 2025 12: 20
          When these statistics were released in Finland, the Finns were second from the bottom of the list—the Somalis, Afghans, and Syrians were vying for the podium, while the Albanians grinned from a respectable fourth place. The Russians were below the Finns in this hit parade.
          1. -11
            28 November 2025 12: 26
            Quote: Anglorussian
            When were these statistics released in Finland?

            I'm embarrassed to ask - do we live in Finland??!! Oh, wow...
            1. +2
              28 November 2025 12: 37
              There's a perception that Afghans are the same everywhere—statistics are similar across Europe. Incidentally, the Palestinians, who are still relatively few in number in Russia, have already been noted for a disproportionate number of rapes.
              1. -9
                28 November 2025 12: 42
                Quote: Anglorussian
                There's a perception that Afghans are the same everywhere—statistics are similar across Europe. Incidentally, the Palestinians, who are still relatively few in number in Russia, have already been noted for a disproportionate number of rapes.

                And? There are obviously more Russian rapists due to their numbers than Afghans and Palestinians.
                From this, you propose to conclude that Russians rape everything that moves all over the world? Russians are the same everywhere, right???
                Are you seriously stretching the statistics of one country to apply to all?
                1. +4
                  28 November 2025 13: 22
                  Statistics take into account the population processed by the statisticians. Otherwise, Indians would become the world's most hardened criminals.
                  1. -8
                    28 November 2025 14: 41
                    Quote: Anglorussian
                    Statistics take into account the population processed by the statisticians. Otherwise, Indians would become the world's most hardened criminals.

                    And in which country in the world – Finland or Russia – is there a nationality column in passports?
                    And is it even present in passports anywhere in decent countries?
                    Therefore, the livestock population is counted by eye....
                    There are 2 jokes about this. STATISTICS mid-2010s:
                    1) Finns are considered the happiest nation in the world, but they rank first in the EU for suicides.
                    2) Finland is the least corrupt country in the world according to ratings, but every time in the 90s or 2000s they hired customs officers in shifts in Brusnichka/Torf/Svetka - there was no corruption on that side, yeah-yeah
                    1. +3
                      28 November 2025 16: 43
                      Without a mark in the passport, national origin disappears. belay There's no "sexual orientation" note in the passport either, but sociologists keep statistics on this issue.
                      1. -6
                        28 November 2025 19: 16
                        Quote: Anglorussian
                        Without a mark in the passport, does national origin disappear?

                        What nationality are my friends Sergey Sergeevich Sergey and Serik Bekbulatovich?
                        What is your nationality? 12 people in Moscow registered in the latest census nationality -"plasterer"? belay feel lol
                        About 1200 people with "Cossack" nationality in Moscow lol lol not even funny.

                        Quote: Anglorussian
                        There is no note on "sexual orientation" in the passport either, but sociologists keep statistics on this issue.
                        I deeply doubt that sociologists have any statistics at all on homosexuals in the Russian Federation.
                      2. +1
                        28 November 2025 19: 19
                        Sociologists, if necessary, clearly distinguish ethnic origins from Cossacks and plasterers. That's their job.
                      3. -4
                        28 November 2025 19: 34
                        Quote: Anglorussian
                        Sociologists, if necessary, clearly distinguish ethnic origins from Cossacks and plasterers. That's their job.

                        Yeah, I believe.

                        You still haven't determined their nationalities? I can give you a hint: one is black, the other is white.
                      4. +3
                        28 November 2025 19: 37
                        If I were a sociologist and had access to the necessary databases, then it would be easy.
                      5. -5
                        28 November 2025 20: 30
                        Quote: Anglorussian
                        If I were a sociologist and had access to the necessary databases, then it would be easy.

                        lol lol lol lol
                        Not a single sociologist NEVER will not be able to do this - even if it has ALL the databases in our country.
                        Simply because the hypothetical "Vasily Petrovich" in our country could be Russian, Kazakh, or Yakut...
                      6. +2
                        29 November 2025 09: 53
                        your1970
                        (Sergei)
                        Simply because the hypothetical "Vasily Petrovich" in our country can be Russian, Kazakh, or Yakut.
                        So, in your opinion, there is no Russian nationality??????
                      7. -4
                        29 November 2025 10: 54
                        Quote: Rostislav Pushkarev Vladimirovich
                        your1970
                        (Sergei)
                        Simply because the hypothetical "Vasily Petrovich" in our country can be Russian, Kazakh, or Yakut.
                        So, in your opinion, there is no Russian nationality??????

                        I'm embarrassed to ask - were Pushkin/Lermontov purebred Russians or in language and spirit?
                        Children of blacks born in the USSR at the Festival - are they Russian or black?
                        Are they Russians who fled overseas and are pouring manure on Russia from there?
                        Quote: your1970
                        What nationality are my friends Sergey Sergeevich Sergey and Serik Bekbulatovich?
                        ?????
                      8. +1
                        29 November 2025 13: 12
                        I'm embarrassed to ask: were Pushkin and Lermontov purebred Russians, or just in language and spirit? Are the children of black parents born in the USSR at the Festival Russian or black?
                        Good questions that are difficult to answer right away.
                        Are they Russians who fled overseas and are pouring manure on Russia from there?
                        When exactly did they flee, and in what year? What kind of manure are they pouring? What exactly do you mean by manure? And specifically on Russia?
                      9. -3
                        29 November 2025 14: 13
                        Quote: Rostislav Pushkarev Vladimirovich
                        Are they Russians who fled overseas and are pouring manure on Russia from there?
                        When exactly did they flee, and in what year? What kind of manure are they pouring? What exactly do you mean by manure? And specifically on Russia?

                        В any During the period of Russia's existence, those who fled under the tsars/general secretaries/now begin to heap filth on Russia, accusing it of absolutely any sin. But then, when power changes, for some reason they never return...
                      10. 0
                        29 November 2025 16: 30
                        Now they're starting to pour manure on Russia.
                        Are you sure it's specifically about Russia? It could be something else.
                        absolutely any sins.
                        Which ones exactly?
                      11. +1
                        29 November 2025 13: 25
                        And by your logic, what nationality am I? If I was born in Baku, and my parents were also born in Baku.
                      12. -3
                        29 November 2025 14: 15
                        Quote: Rostislav Pushkarev Vladimirovich
                        And by your logic, what nationality am I? If I was born in Baku, and my parents were also born in Baku.

                        You did not answer my question
                        Quote: your1970
                        What nationality are my friends Sergey Sergeevich Sergey and Serik Bekbulatovich?
                      13. +2
                        29 November 2025 16: 34
                        What nationality are my friends Sergey Sergeevich Sergey and Serik Bekbulatovich?
                        I can't answer your specific question. Because I don't know these people personally, I'm not acquainted with them, I don't know what they think or their views. How do I know your friends?
                      14. -3
                        29 November 2025 18: 13
                        Quote: Rostislav Pushkarev Vladimirovich
                        And by your logic, what nationality am I? If I was born in Baku, and my parents were also born in Baku.

                        lol
                        I can't answer your specific question because I don't know you personally, I'm not acquainted with you, I don't know what you think or your views. How do I know you?
                      15. +2
                        29 November 2025 21: 27
                        I don't know what you think or your views. How do I know you?
                        I'm Russian, and my birth certificate says I'm Russian, just like my mother, father, and grandparents. My social views are communist. I support the Russian people, morally speaking. Financially, I can't afford it because I need to survive.
                      16. -3
                        29 November 2025 22: 29
                        Quote: Rostislav Pushkarev Vladimirovich
                        I am Russian and my birth certificate also says that I am Russian, just like my mother and father and my grandparents.

                        1) A Soviet birth certificate - they haven't been writing them for a long time
                        2) Considering USSR documents regarding nationality as reliable, especially those issued outside the European part of the RSFSR, is nonsense. For a tiny fraction, and often without it, passport officers wrote it down from the application, out of the blue. I know too many purebred Kazakhs—Bulat Amantaevichs—whose passports were "Russian." And Azerbaijan has always been corrupt. To us Kurds and Koreans They've been living here since the 1960s - Russians by passport lol

                        Quote: Rostislav Pushkarev Vladimirovich
                        And I support the Russian people, I mean morally.
                        - Thanks for that. Moral support is always good, especially if it's sincere.
                      17. +1
                        1 December 2025 17: 45
                        I'm embarrassed to ask - were Pushkin/Lermontov purebred Russians or in language and spirit?


                        Nationality is determined by the father's name. Was Pushkin's father Arab? Was Lermontov's father Scottish? Children of black fathers are black by nationality. But they grow up in Russian culture and have a Russian mentality. Unless, of course, they grow up in a separate ethnic enclave.
                        There are concepts like "Russian Tatar" or "Russian Bashkir." These didn't just pop up out of nowhere.
                      18. -1
                        1 December 2025 18: 00
                        [quote=cast iron][quote]I'm embarrassed to ask - were Pushkin/Lermontov purebred Russians or in language and spirit?[/quote]

                        Nationality is determined by the father's name. Was Pushkin's father Arab? Was Lermontov's father Scottish? Children of black fathers are black by nationality. But they grow up in Russian culture and have a Russian mentality. Unless, of course, they grow up in a separate ethnic enclave.
                        There are such concepts as "Russian Tatar" or "Russian Bashkir." These didn't just pop up out of nowhere.
                        Exactly about it That's what I wrote.[quote=свой1970]Simply because the conventional “Vasily Petrovich” here could be Russian, Kazakh, or Yakut....[/quote]
                        [quote=свой1970]I'm embarrassed to ask - were Pushkin/Lermontov purebred Russians or language and spirit?
                        Children of blacks born in the USSR at the Festival - are they Russian or black?
                        Are they Russians who fled overseas and are pouring manure on Russia from there?/ Quote]
                        And my opponent fell into
                        [quote=RostislavPushkarevVladimirovich]Does this mean, in your opinion, that there is no Russian nationality??????[/quote]
            2. -3
              29 November 2025 11: 58
              Quote: your1970
              Quote: Anglorussian
              When were these statistics released in Finland?

              I'm embarrassed to ask - do we live in Finland??!! Oh, wow...

              For 7 inadequate people - whose mothers hit their temples against the corner of the safe as children - These are the statistics of FINLAND(!!!!!!) -
              Quote: Anglorussian
              Average Afghan 25 times more likely to commit violent crimes than a native-born person.
              Finland!!!!!!
              7 people fool fool fool
  29. +9
    28 November 2025 09: 47
    Well, it's much easier, more profitable, and safer to fight Russian fascists, skinheads, and nationalists. It's good to fight something that doesn't exist. Incidentally, how the term "Russian world" has vanished from the official agenda, not to mention the rampant plov festivals on November 4th, the lavish Eid al-Adha celebrations with prayers in public squares and the slaughter of livestock in playgrounds, all under government protection, the proliferating Wahhabi mosques, the countless TV series about "Eastern fairy tales" and the "sultans of its heart," the unpunished terror against Russian children in schools, the promotion of the narrative that Russian drunks and slackers, unlike hardworking bearded men, are something else entirely. It's immediately obvious who the British tin cans are, and how Russia "resists" the West.
  30. +1
    28 November 2025 09: 47
    Well, if it weren’t for the war and constant terrorist attacks in the Russian Federation, I wouldn’t be against hijabs and other religious devices, from the point of view of public safety.
    As for public prayers in unauthorized places, the administrative penalties should be skyrocketed. 15 days in jail or the same amount of community service. They say there's a labor shortage in Russia. Here's the solution. Put a mat down in the subway and go shovel snow for 15 days. And again, the subway is a federally hazardous industrial facility, so why impose your own rules there? Just like many other places. And yes, public prayers in non-designated areas can offend the sensibilities of people from other concessions. He went out into an open field in the Moscow region. Oh, for God's sake, it doesn't bother him at all.
    1. +5
      28 November 2025 10: 31
      Those praying in the metro clearly haven't read the Quran - it's clearly written not to pray in the dungeon.
      1. 0
        28 November 2025 11: 38
        If he can read at all."""
    2. 0
      28 November 2025 19: 22
      Mail.ru already reports today that one "Muscovite" is demanding that the Christmas tree be removed from the entrance of his building (in the "Serednevsky Forest" residential complex), because it does not correspond to his religious beliefs.
  31. +4
    28 November 2025 09: 52

    The author has written more than once about the “creeping Islamization” in Russia, and the wearing of niqabs, public prayers, and various so-called “fatwas” issued by the Spiritual Administration of Muslims (SAM) in abundance are part of these processes.

    That's exactly what's happening. Moreover, this process is controlled from a single center.
  32. +11
    28 November 2025 10: 23
    They humiliate Russians as much as they want! Because the thieves in the government don't have any plans for themselves or their children to live in Russia.
  33. +1
    28 November 2025 10: 30
    All this nonsense stems from permissiveness and laissez-faire. Fines won't help. The only effective way, in my opinion, is to show who's who. I think you, dear sirs, have figured out how. I live in the very center of the city, where we've also developed our own "Bishkek." From the very beginning, our Central Asian brothers were explained in the most accessible and extremely understandable way possible where they had come and how they were supposed to live (or not live). No prayers, no public sacrifices, no littering—everyone is polite. On holidays and birthdays, they treat us to national dishes (we, by the way, do the same, but less often). They ask permission to smoke hookah in the yard, drink tea, or make shashlik. We, of course, don't ask anyone—not the cops, not the fire department, not anyone at all. We have barbecues, tables, and chairs outside year-round. In the evenings, we gather with neighbors, have a drink, and discuss various topics. We repair our cars in the yard and park them wherever we want. There's a gorgeous dovecote in the center of the yard. If you accidentally forget something, no one will take it, even if you visit the local dumpster. That's about it.
  34. +2
    28 November 2025 10: 37
    Disaster in 2030


    By 2030, according to Rosstat statistics, the number of children born to migrant women will exceed the number born to indigenous peoples of Russia.


    In 2025, the birth rate among migrants is 38% higher than the average birth rate among the peoples of Russia.


    According to the Civil Registry Office, by the end of 2025, 1,095,497 newborns were registered in Russia. 


    That same year, Russian women aborted approximately 1,588,000 unborn children. And these are only official figures; they don't include private clinics.


    The year 2025 has become an anti-record year: this is the lowest number of births in the country for the entire 21st century. Even in 1999, which demographers call the worst birth rate in Russia's modern history, more children were born: 1,215 million.


    During the same period, the number of births in the five Central Asian republics was 1,916,690. Just think about it: in the younger and future generations, the share of Central Asia is 20% higher.


    This means that by the end of the century, Russia will have 25,7 million more migrants and their descendants, while the share of Russians will decline from 81% to 59,8%. This is an extremely dangerous scenario, where Russians practically cease to be a majority in their own country.


    It turns out that a real war is underway between parents and their children, and in it, as in any war, torrents of blood flow, and here murder is combined with torture. This carnage, which claims tens of millions of victims annually, is somehow not called, with the hypocrisy inherent in modern man, by its proper name: "the murder of the innocent and defenseless." No, it is hidden and disguised by the vague and shamelessly hypocritical term "abortion," which means "throwing away," as if we are dealing with unwanted trash tossed from a home into a garbage heap, and not with a living being—a child.
    The victims of this invisible war are greater than those of all wars combined, all murders and executions. This crime negates all rights, not only divine but also human.


    You can't build happiness on the blood of your own murdered children...


    "Nations sometimes forget their national tasks; but such nations perish, they become soil, fertilizer, on which other, stronger nations grow and strengthen," – from the speech of the Prime Minister of the Russian Empire Pyotr Arkadyevich Stolypin to the Duma on May 5, 1908.


    — Archpriest Peter Guryanov
    https://t.me/Petr_Guryanov

    Add:
    WHO'S GUILTY?
    Really Russian women?!?
    1. -4
      28 November 2025 12: 04
      Quote: depressant
      During the same period in five(¡!!!!!!!!!!) In the Central Asian republics the number of births was 1,916,690.

      Quote: depressant
      According to the Civil Registry Office, by the end of 2025, 1,095,497 newborns were registered in Russia. 

      The population of the Russian Federation is 146 million versus 83 million in the 5 countries of Central Asia, while the birth rate is only 2 times higher than in the smallest year in the Russian Federation.

      Meanwhile, the 38% excess birth rate figure for migrants is being pulled out of thin air. And this is taking into account that nationality is not included in passports or recorded in pregnant women's interviews.

      Your source solemnly pulls an owl onto the globe - we have a bad birth rate and abortions - but why lie???!!!!!
    2. -1
      30 November 2025 11: 44
      Quote: depressant
      Add:
      WHO'S GUILTY?
      Really Russian women?!?

      They, too, are Russian citizens and therefore responsible for what happens in the country.
  35. +2
    28 November 2025 10: 53
    Russia won't be relying solely on Central Asia anymore, as fresh news has surfaced. Meet: laughing
    ASTRAKHAN, November 28 – RIA Novosti. Kabul is discussing with Russian authorities the possibility of recruiting Afghan migrant workers for agricultural work, Afghan Ambassador to Russia Hassan Gull Hassan told RIA Novosti.
    "We were recently in Tatarstan and discussed this with the rais (head – ed.) of Tatarstan (Rustam Minnikhanov – ed.). We hope this issue will be further discussed. For now, we've proposed agricultural workers, but we hope that if we can reach an agreement, we'll work in other areas as well," the ambassador said on the sidelines of the 3rd Astrakhan International Forum of the North-South – New Horizons International Transport Corridor.

    That is, instead of creating jobs in Afghanistan as the USSR did, we are being asked to import migrants into the country, thereby increasing the already growing level of tension in society.
  36. +4
    28 November 2025 10: 59
    Quote: Anglorussian
    Those praying in the metro clearly haven't read the Quran - it's clearly written not to pray in the dungeons.

    Yes. Why are they giving you a minus? winked
    There's also a lot about love and respect for people, "neighbors." Without any reference to their religion. wink
  37. +1
    28 November 2025 11: 10
    Quote: AK-1945
    All this crap stems from permissiveness and laissez-faire. No amount of fines will help.

    Absolutely right. I wrote it. There are other administrative penalties. Snow removal, trash removal... 15 days. Deportation. Entry ban. Fines of 15 rubles could be imposed. And that would be quite helpful. And most importantly, law enforcement agencies are responsible for enforcing administrative laws. And everything will work. But when it comes to migrants, some diaspora leaders come running and let them go.
  38. +2
    28 November 2025 12: 25
    In my opinion, every religion has its extremists, although Christian ones (for now) are not so aggressive, but in the past it was different, for example, during the Crusades or the conquest of new lands.
  39. -9
    28 November 2025 13: 07
    I don't understand the point of the article. Is the author calling for a ban on religious worship in public places?
    Personally, neither niqabs nor prayers bother me, unless, of course, they block traffic in the city. Like on Prospekt Mira on certain days.
    And I don't understand why the author isn't outraged by the activities of Hindus. They walk around, you see, in sheets and beat drums. And even Orthodox Christians sometimes cross themselves publicly in the most brazen manner.
    1. 0
      29 November 2025 04: 15
      But we all understood you perfectly well - a lover of Wahhabis and religious fanatics
  40. +1
    28 November 2025 13: 16
    Quote: also a doctor
    We have a law prohibiting public displays of religiosity.

    Are you referring to Federal Law No. 125 "On Freedom of Conscience and Religious Associations"?
    If so, there's no such prohibition there. There's something about missionary activity, which is a bit different...
    If not, could you please indicate the specific regulatory act?
  41. +2
    28 November 2025 13: 20
    THIS IS THE TYPE OF APPEAL THAT EACH OF US CAN SEND TO THE PRESIDENT.

    TEXT OF THE APPEAL

    ?? month 2025 to the President of the Russian Federation
    Name of your locality to Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin
    Address: 103132, Moscow, st. Ilyinka, 23

    Applicant: [Your: Last name, First name, Patronymic in full]
    Date of birth: [dd.mm.yyyy]
    Place of birth: [full name]
    Registration address: [full postal address with zip code]
    Actual residential address: [full postal address with zip code]
    Email: (if you want to receive a reply by email)

    APPLICATION
    on the provision of information
    on the activities of government bodies
    Dear President of the Russian Federation!
    I, Surname Name Patronymic, a citizen of the Russian Federation, am your voter, and, consequently, your employer, since, in accordance with Part 1 of Article 3 of the Constitution, the only source of power in the Russian Federation is its multinational people, in accordance with Part 2 of Article 24 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation, and also in accordance with the provisions of Federal Law No. 8-FZ of 09.02.2009 (as amended on 14.07.2022) "On Ensuring Access to Information on the Activities of State Bodies and Local Self-Government Bodies", and Federal Law No. 149-FZ of 27.07.2006 "On Information, Information Technologies and the Protection of Information",

    I BEG:
    1. Provide, for review, copies of the annual reports of the Government of the Russian Federation to the President of the Russian Federation on the progress of the implementation of the Concept of State Migration Policy, prepared in accordance with subparagraph "b" of paragraph 34 of the Concept of State Migration Policy of the Russian Federation for 2019-2025, approved by Decree No. 622 of October 31, 2018 of the President of the Russian Federation.

    2. Provide the specified reports for the period from 2019 to 2024, inclusive (the report for 2025 has not yet been prepared due to the incompleteness of the reporting period).

    3. Submit the specified reports electronically to the specified email address, in PDF format, with an electronic digital signature of the authorized official.

    4. In accordance with Part 1 of Article 12 of Federal Law No. 59-FZ of May 2, 2006 (as amended on December 28, 2024) "On the Procedure for Considering Appeals from Citizens of the Russian Federation", I request that you provide a reasoned response to this application no later than 30 days from the date of its registration.

    If the requested information contains information constituting a state or other secret protected by law, or is otherwise restricted from dissemination, please notify me within the time period established by law, indicating the specific grounds for refusal and the regulations on which it is based.

    Reason for the appeal:
    The said reports are official documents reflecting the results of the activities of government bodies in the field of migration policy, which is of public interest and is important for the exercise of my constitutional rights.

    In accordance with Part 1 of Article 3 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation, the bearer of sovereignty and the sole source of power in the Russian Federation is its multinational people.

    In accordance with Part 2 of Article 3 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation, the people exercise their power directly, as well as through state authorities and local government bodies.

    In accordance with Article 130 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation, local self-government ensures independent decision-making by the population on issues of local importance.

    In accordance with Article 131 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation, self-government is exercised in urban, rural settlements, and other territories, taking into account historical and other local traditions.
    At the same time, the structure of local government bodies is determined by the population independently.

    In accordance with Part 3 of Article 132 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation, local government bodies and state authorities are part of a unified system of public authority in the Russian Federation and interact to most effectively address issues in the interests of the population living in the relevant territory.
    Due to the fact that foreign citizens arriving in the Russian Federation reside directly among citizens of the Russian Federation, in the territories of, namely, municipal entities, citizens of the Russian Federation must exercise control over the progress of migration policy, namely, in municipal executive authorities, at their place of residence.

    In this regard, I consider it necessary to publish annual reports of the Government of the Russian Federation on the progress of migration policy in the public domain.
    Sincerely, signature Full name
  42. +2
    28 November 2025 13: 39
    Quote: Ilya-spb
    And we also need to return to faith in God.

    I personally have two questions here:
    - Which one specifically?
    - what for?
    I'm really interested in your opinion...
  43. 0
    28 November 2025 14: 03
    Following up on the address to the President.

    Every year, he's given a classified—I emphasize, CLOSED—report on the state of foreign migration into our country. And what's written in that report, which surely benefits our corrupt bureaucrats, the corrupt Ministry of Internal Affairs, and our insatiable oligarchs, is anyone's guess!
    Judging by the forum, some of our comrades don't care whether a minibus driver prays mid-trip or not, and passengers are forced to wait patiently while he prays to his heart's content. But many of us already feel like strangers in our own country. The occupiers are getting a kickback from our budget, using our taxes, and are afforded full social security. Our judicial system condones them, and they commit crimes against our citizens with near impunity—the diaspora will intercede! The number of crimes against us is growing year after year—the figures are publicly available!
    So let's not pass by this appeal!
    It's easy to print from your computer, insert what you need, and send it by mail for next to nothing.
    I demand!
    The annual report to the president must be accessible to every citizen of the country. For we, the citizens, the indigenous people of Russia, are the source of power in Russia! Let's finally remember this. We screwed up the USSR, so let's not screw up the rest of the country to the unofficial, but nonetheless occupying forces of the Asians. Our ancestors will not forgive us! Our descendants, having become homeless, will not forgive. Our future depends on us. Now is the decisive moment.
  44. +3
    28 November 2025 14: 22
    We have a secular state. And all religions and their worship must be practiced in designated places, namely, temples, mosques, and the like. There, you can pray to whomever you want, in whatever attire you like! But not in public places!
  45. 0
    28 November 2025 14: 46
    Even just a short message. As a citizen of Russia, and therefore the source of your power, Mr. President, I demand the publication of an annual report on migration. Including for all past years. Just a handwritten text like this!
    And you will receive an answer!
    And the more such appeals there are, the greater the fear in the Presidential Administration.
    And, believe me, there will be no reprisals against the person who sent the request. None!
    1. +6
      28 November 2025 16: 29
      And the more such appeals there are, the greater the fear in the Presidential Administration.

      Oh, Lyudmila Yakovlevna, Lyudmila Yakovlevna! Do you really believe these people are afraid of US? They're not afraid at all, not even half a drop. But they should be wary of that dark force that invites them into the country as "valuable specialists." And in general, this topic has been written about many times, and it's just a whiff of anger. bully But it’s somehow improper to believe in a good tsar and evil boyars; for many, everything is already clear, believe me. hi
      1. 0
        28 November 2025 17: 25
        No more steam in the whistle.

        No! Times are changing. The government is walking a tightrope – such is the political moment. Prigozhin's rebellion, which lacked courage, is a reality. The country is teeming with "stray" weapons, which could be turned against the Kremlin at any moment – ​​whether by migrants, or by SVO fighters, or by partisans (who are already proving themselves), or by saboteurs. Therefore, the government is suddenly in dire need of popular support. So let it "spend its time" to get it. Let it accommodate us. To do this, we must clearly state what we want from it. But not through half-hearted discussions on forums, but through written demands, each of which becomes not just a letter to a village elder, but a formal written document.
        1. +3
          28 November 2025 17: 45
          No! Times are changing. The government is walking a tightrope – such is the political moment.
          Okay, stick to your opinion, but tell me, why was it that during the Soviet era, all the republics had a republican central party committee, while Russia... didn't? recourse What is it and how is it? bully
          1. +3
            28 November 2025 18: 14
            Why does everyone want to separate Russians from Russia? Why do you need a Russian republic if all of Russia is Russian? Apparently, the same was believed in the USSR.
            At least I know that it is impossible to create a Russian republic; a new Yeltsin will appear.
          2. +1
            28 November 2025 19: 10
            There was no Russian Komsomol, no Russian Council of Trade Unions (although several republican sectoral trade unions did exist in the RSFSR), and no republican Academy of Sciences. Perhaps because more than half of the communists, Komsomol members, and trade union members lived in the RSFSR? And the structures of the CPSU Central Committee and the USSR Council of Ministers were dominated by residents of the RSFSR and ethnic Russians. It turns out that, on the one hand, the RSFSR had a truncated governance structure, but, on the other, its representatives dominated union structures. The most absurd body in terms of composition was the Council of Nationalities of the Supreme Soviet of the USSR. The RSFSR, like other union republics, had 32 representatives there. Meanwhile, the ASSRs, autonomous oblasts, and autonomous okrugs that were part of the RSFSR, which contained less than a fifth of the RSFSR's population, sent a combined 211 representatives to this chamber. At the same time, residents of the autonomous regions also participated in the elections of some of the 32 deputies of the Council of Nationalities from the RSFSR.)
          3. +1
            28 November 2025 19: 30
            Why did all the republics have a republican central party committee during the Soviet era, while Russia didn't?

            It was believed that if Russians were given their own Communist Party, they would feel like a people within the USSR, separate from the rest, and therefore entitled to the same rights as everyone else. And they would very quickly refuse to be mere expendable material, whose purpose was not to assert rights but to bind together completely disparate pieces of territory, each inhabited by its own ethnic group, often with no historical connection to many others. Tell me, what is the connection between, say, Catholic Latvia and Muslim Tajikistan? Where is one and where is the other? And to bind them into a single state, it was necessary to populate both republics with a single people—Russians. They are foreign in both places, but they are the same in both Latvia and Tajikistan. And they bring the same Soviet ideology to both republics, that is, they Sovietize them. Without such a bond, without such expendable material in the form of Russians, neither the Tsarist Empire nor the USSR could have existed. As a result, the creation of a Communist Party of the RSFSR was not permitted. Had it been created, it would have been perceived in the Union republics as an autonomy for the RSFSR, and therefore a violation of the unitary nature of the USSR. There was a fear that, given the flourishing nationalism that espoused aversion to Russians, persecution of them, attempts at mass expulsion (asking, "Go back to your Russia"), and so on, would have inevitably led to the collapse of the USSR long before the 90s, when the betrayal of the USSR had not yet been sufficiently prepared for them. Exactly the same thing is happening now.
        2. +2
          28 November 2025 21: 51
          Quote: depressant
          Let her meet us halfway. To do this, we must clearly state what we want from her.

          Made me laugh until I cried laughing
          In 1991, in a referendum, the people of the USSR clearly stated what they wanted. Where did the government put these wishes? And now we have the SVO. wink
  46. +2
    28 November 2025 14: 50
    It's easy enough to ask questions. But who will provide the answers? To the main questions, "Who is to blame? And what is to be done?" Perhaps the answers will come from some force that's not particularly visible right now? But the consequences could be tragic. For all of us.
  47. -4
    28 November 2025 14: 51
    The ban on niqabs, the introduction of clergy in cassocks, and punishment for prayers and the sign of the cross in public places will provoke civil war and the disintegration of the federation along ethnic and religious lines.
    1. +2
      28 November 2025 15: 29
      Really?! Doesn't it matter that Federal Law 126 exists? Doesn't it matter that prayers in public places are equated by this law with unauthorized public events? Doesn't it matter that Russia is a secular state and everyone within it is obligated to obey its laws, and anyone who doesn't like it is either sent to prison or abroad.
    2. +1
      1 December 2025 09: 10
      Who are these "citizens" of ours who would start a civil war over a ban on niqabs and namaz? Aren't they those former Wahhabis—Tajiks, Uzbeks, and Kyrgyz—who came to Russia, bought citizenship, and now receive social security benefits for their entire families? Aren't you taking on too much? Are you thinking too highly of yourself?
  48. +4
    28 November 2025 15: 22
    If stars are shining, it means someone needs it. We need to decide whether we need immigration, and if so, what kind. For me, a work visa with skills testing, tied to a job, with employer-sponsored insurance, and no family. Work hard and leave. Work well and you'll have preferential treatment for the next contract. We need to work with muftis and representatives of other faiths to preach that radicalism is bad. Diasporas—what to do with them? Essentially, diasporas are a foreign state in our country. A ton of issues that need to be addressed before it's too late.
  49. +3
    28 November 2025 15: 25
    Prayer in public is considered equivalent to holding a public religious event without the approval of the authorities. This is punishable under the Russian Code of Administrative Offenses.
    It is visiting Muslims who perform namaz in public places, showing that they disregard the laws of the country they have arrived to.
    The same thing with niqabs.
  50. +7
    28 November 2025 15: 45
    The authorities in Russia are themselves Russophobic.
    1. +4
      28 November 2025 17: 30
      So look who is in power.
      There are practically no Russians present there.
  51. +3
    28 November 2025 15: 48
    And how is the Chief Mufti of Russia doing? Or is he in constant communication with Allah and doesn't care about the Dumas? If he can't force his fellow believers into the confines of a secular state, then is he really the leader? Maybe we should tug his beard, maybe he'll wake up?
  52. +1
    28 November 2025 16: 05
    Quote: Grencer81
    Doesn't it matter that there is Federal Law 126?

    I apologize, but what does Federal Law No. 126 "On Communications" have to do with this?
  53. +4
    28 November 2025 16: 23
    It seems that until the "Black Hundreds" are revived, this will continue.
  54. +7
    28 November 2025 17: 24
    In Russia, proposals of this kind from deputies (the same Mikhail Matveyev) are met with assertions that Russia is, supposedly, a “multinational and multi-confessional country.”

    The ruling party, "Eat Russia"... oh, excuse me, United Russia constantly fails to pass similar laws on migrants—they just don't vote. They don't vote at all. The result: no quorum, the law is scrapped. They've already scrapped a dozen similar laws. An anti-state, anti-Russian, anti-people party...
  55. +1
    28 November 2025 17: 49
    Quote: Alien ...
    Are you suggesting that Russians believe in a non-Russian god?

    God has no nationality.
  56. +1
    28 November 2025 18: 28
    Have you tried spreading it with pork fat?
  57. +4
    28 November 2025 18: 32
    Russian authorities must clamp down on all forms of Islamist extremism, specifically by banning the niqab and toughening penalties for public prayer, and make decisions without regard for organizations like the Spiritual Directorate of Muslims, as otherwise the problem will only worsen.

    This is not a matter of wishful thinking! It is a pressing need for the preservation and development of Russian civilization, which is under increasing overt and, more dangerously, covert, creeping attacks from all sides, aimed at eroding and devaluing its fundamental values ​​with the ultimate goal of its destruction!
  58. -2
    28 November 2025 19: 16
    Quote: Jacques Sekavar
    The ban on niqabs, the introduction of clergy in cassocks, and punishment for prayers and the sign of the cross in public places will provoke civil war and the disintegration of the federation along ethnic and religious lines.

    This is a fallacy. "Power comes from God," "God endured, and commanded us to do the same," "turn the other cheek"...
  59. +2
    28 November 2025 19: 27
    Quote: Anglorussian
    Mail.ru is already reporting today that a "Muscovite" is demanding that the Christmas tree be removed from the entrance of his building (the "Serednevsky Forest" residential complex) because it does not correspond to his religious beliefs.

    It's simple. Bring charges for inciting hatred, and then, based on the results, either jail them or deport them. If they're our citizens, strip them of their citizenship and send them back to their homeland. Something like that.
  60. +3
    28 November 2025 19: 38
    Quote from Fisher
    We need to work with muftis and representatives of other faiths to preach that radicalism is bad. What should we do about the diasporas? Essentially, the diasporas are a foreign state in our country.

    Yeah. They explained everything once, then held me accountable for failure to comply. And diasporas should be completely outlawed. No negotiations between officials or law enforcement with such characters. Diaspora is a custom inherent in a foreign state. Russian law doesn't provide for such a thing. And in Russia, thank God, Russian law now takes precedence. The leader of such a diaspora comes to a law enforcement officer. Who are you? I represent the diaspora. That's it. Off to the garden. On a solo hike. And then, as you choose, as the arrangement goes.
  61. +5
    28 November 2025 19: 48
    There's no need to ban anything. It's enough to say that the country is a secular state, and all religious worship can only be held in designated places of worship or in private homes or apartments. Anything held on the street will be punishable by fines and administrative penalties. This applies to all religious groups without exception. There is a national flag and coat of arms that are uniform throughout Russia.
  62. +2
    28 November 2025 19: 55
    Quote: Jacques Sekavar
    The ban on niqabs, the introduction of clergy in cassocks, and punishment for prayers and the sign of the cross in public places will provoke a civil war and the disintegration of the federation along ethnic and religious lines.

    Well, you're a little wrong. No one's stopping you from wearing cassocks or other religious clothing. Not at all.
    In Russia, a secret military operation is underway, and there are many terrorist attacks. Facial recognition systems are also being gradually introduced to ensure the security of Russian citizens and the state. For what purpose? For security. So, I'll halve this statement.
    Crocus is proof. I would ban the wearing of masks and balaclavas in non-combat zones unless there are COVID-19 restrictions.
    Let me remind you that the Russian Federation is a secular state. First comes the Law, then come religious feelings and beliefs that do not violate that Law.
    If memory serves, a Russian woman will cover her head when speaking to a Saudi man or entering certain establishments. Because that's their law.
    One person's public prayer in a public place will violate the law and the religious feelings of 1000 people of other faiths passing by. That's how it works.
  63. +2
    28 November 2025 19: 56
    And by the way!
    I want to remind you, my dear comrades, that the party workers who demanded the creation of an ethnic Russian republic in 1947 were shot. All of them.
    1. -1
      30 November 2025 11: 47
      Quote: depressant
      All of them.

      Not all of them. They later orchestrated the collapse of the USSR in 1991.
  64. +1
    28 November 2025 20: 02
    And yes, the Sacrament of the Sign of the Cross is performed in our churches. And if public passage is necessary, then, in accordance with the law, this event must be coordinated with the authorities. For what purpose? To ensure the security of these events by law enforcement, as required by the law. So, everything is smooth. Smooth. And calm. wink
  65. +3
    28 November 2025 20: 54
    The diasporas are in power, and the 5th Column in power greatly assists them. There is no Russian Georgian Stalin in Russia, nor will there ever be one. And there will be more young, literate, and patriotic members of the NKT and RE.
  66. +4
    28 November 2025 21: 14
    Russia's current rulers are deliberately replacing the country's indigenous peoples with poorly educated "specialists" from Asia. This is the source of the collapse of education (they need a dumb and illiterate people) and healthcare.
    And all this is because our rulers and the people hanging around them need the country only to fill their personal pockets.
    As for the Russian Orthodox Church, it has long been a "slacker" LLC, pumping money out of wherever it can.
  67. +1
    28 November 2025 21: 38
    This is further proof that public prayer is, first and foremost, a political action.

    Who would doubt that.
    Since we have the Russian Federation, a multinational and multi-confessional country, with the ban on namaz in public places, it is logical to also ban other religious activities in public, for example... religious processions wink
    There should be equality and brotherhood between faiths. lol
    But within the framework of the state program of general religiosity of the population, as they say: who will give it to you? laughing
  68. +3
    28 November 2025 21: 41
    And the Kremlin is silent about the mass prayer. Absolutely. Only Severny Chelovek (The Northern Man) highlighted the incident, and even then only slightly.
  69. +3
    28 November 2025 21: 57
    The article began with Kyrgyzstan.
    Here's something funny about this country.
    "They have, as we know, their own migrants from Bangladesh who cry on camera because of Kyrgyz Nazism.
    Upon entry, the "brown" people's passports are confiscated and they are treated as virtual slaves. After some time, the unfortunates are discovered by the police.

    No medical insurance, no special conditions or privileges - just unfiltered Asian nocism."

    This is one of the comments in the telegram BREATHE FREELY.
  70. -1
    28 November 2025 22: 54
    Ban it through fines, and use the proceeds for the construction of Orthodox churches.
  71. 0
    28 November 2025 22: 57
    With commentators like these, Russia will never ban niqabs, or prayers in public places, or anything that should be banned. NOTHING!!!
  72. The comment was deleted.
  73. +2
    29 November 2025 02: 26
    They won't be banned until at least 2030. And the opinions of parliamentarians are irrelevant; they are simply executors of the supreme will. As long as the government professes a love for migrants and friendship with Asians and other adherents of Islam, we will tolerate hijabs and niqabs.
  74. +3
    29 November 2025 04: 39
    The authorities are probably waiting for everyone who comes here to wear niqabs like these... And that's quite possible with this policy.
  75. +4
    29 November 2025 06: 39
    Islamization is underway...Islamic banking...Islamic mortgages...special rules for wearing clothes in the Caucasus...diaspora organized crime groups...
    .
  76. kig
    -3
    29 November 2025 07: 22
    "Keep it in place and don't let it in" is what's prohibited by law. For example, praying in public places. And the niqab...that's called xenophobia. In Ukraine and Europe, wearing St. George's ribbons is forbidden—what do you call that?
    1. -2
      1 December 2025 09: 17
      We've already realized you're a fan of religious fanatics and the Ukrainian Reich. First, learn to write in Russian, and then tell us Russians what we should and shouldn't do.
      1. kig
        0
        1 December 2025 11: 03
        Quote: cast iron
        First learn to write in Russian.

        "Don't let in" is an expression from G. Uspensky's story "The Booth", you literate fellow tongue

        In medicine, xenophobia is considered one of the obsessive states.
        1. 0
          1 December 2025 17: 36
          Go back to your "Ukraine" and speak your own language. You don't speak Russian. You'll be exposed immediately.
          1. kig
            0
            2 December 2025 06: 09
            Quote: cast iron
            Go back to your "Ukraine" already.

            Well, you guessed wrong. But you try to find a country where citizens of only one nationality live, and go there. Then, perhaps, you'll calm down and live happily.
  77. +3
    29 November 2025 08: 50
    Maybe when they ban Turks from building mosques here.
    The Kremlin's reaction is unclear. On the one hand, they're already openly writing and talking about Turkey's claim to the lion's share of our territory. On the other, they're allowing the construction of new mosques?
    Since the collapse of the USSR, people have suddenly become truly orthodox. This is what we see in the Caucasus, for example! Before that, people were basically normal. am
  78. +2
    29 November 2025 13: 05
    I know that no one will read it anymore.
    But -- catching up. I just found BREATHE FREELY on the cart today. This:
    "I found some very interesting recollections about the atmosphere in Dushanbe that preceded the Russo-Russian crackdown of 1990.

    A Russian boy showed up at the hospital where a teenager was being treated and was being ignored by the staff. The boy told his mother, who contacted the administration to rectify the situation.
    After the reprimand, the nurse approached the teenager and said: “Soon we will cut all the Russians and not a single one will remain here.”

    Since the teenager had a Russian mother, he rushed to tell her, his mother reported it to various authorities, and it turned out that the KGB was aware of what was happening.

    This was 1989, and judging by the fact that it was the KGB that was quietly involved in this—unlike the isolated cases with the Ministry of Internal Affairs—the cauldron had been seething for a long time.
    And no one stopped this activity.

    #tajikistan_independence"
  79. +2
    29 November 2025 15: 32
    Russia is a land of wonders fool
    Who would doubt it? If Russian movements have been suppressing the Labor Code since the early 2000s, they pose a threat to the government. It will be difficult to steal from your schemes if your people suddenly remember who you are and demand your rights.
    And with the Zamotashki and Abu-bandits, everything can be settled with money. That's what they think. However, they're mistaken: as soon as the Zamotashki and Abu-bandits gain power, those who do business with them will be the first to go to the scaffold.
  80. +1
    30 November 2025 04: 25
    Capitalism makes people evil. Good people will always find common ground, no matter their nationality or religion.
  81. +1
    30 November 2025 08: 23
    Quote: 30 vis
    Quote from osp
    The CPSU was replaced by United Russia.
    The ideology is different, but the principle is the same.

    Any worker could go to the company's party committee and bring their issue up for discussion at a party meeting. And there they would ask harsh questions and punish. Who can Ivan Ivanovich go to with his questions now?


    Now I'll have to get through to the manager or the owner. And then it depends on the issue. And only on the economic side. The Honor Board is no longer reducing interest rates on apartment loans or increasing interest rates on deposits.
    But rationalization proposals can still increase wages.
    And this is decided not at a meeting of all the poultry factory employees by vote after three hours of speeches and discussions, but in twenty minutes of "bargaining" between "I want +50 percent to my salary with payment for two years in advance" and "Will I definitely get +5 percent of net profit next year?"
  82. 0
    30 November 2025 13: 02
    By banning niqabs as a religious attribute, it is also necessary to ban the wearing of all other religious attributes of all religions, such as crosses, and for clergy to appear in special clothing outside of their workplaces, religious processions, and other public religious events and holidays - absurd!
    1. 0
      1 December 2025 09: 21
      It should also be prohibited to wear all other religious attributes of all religions, such as crosses,


      People like you should be banned from ever setting foot in Russia or writing anything in Russian. That's what really needs to be done.
  83. Owl
    +1
    30 November 2025 20: 13
    When? When the "Supreme One" gives the "command," but for now, his "oligarch friends" are reaping the profits, the police are close to total annihilation, and the "Rosgavgeitsy"—the elite, under the protection of their "friend from St. Petersburg"...
  84. +2
    30 November 2025 20: 27
    Quote: IS-80_RVGK2
    And? Dialectical materialism was immediately abolished in the USSR.

    No. He simply gave dissenters, or rather, those of other faiths, a breath of fresh air. My point is, he wasn't all that scary. It's just that at a certain time, the system produced such a person. Thanks to the dim-witted Khrushchev, who, in my opinion, skimmed all the cream, and during WWII, he only got into trouble. And he erased Stalin. In 1952, before the Congress of the CPSU Central Committee, Stalin wrote a letter to the Central Committee, in which he stated that we should strive to create conditions for citizens to work a five-day week, five hours a day. When asked why? He replied to the Central Committee: the rest of the time, people should focus on family, additional education, and spiritual development. If he had lived another 15 years, we would have seen a completely different USSR. Naturally, this may be a personal opinion. I also studied in the USSR, the cult of Stalin and all that... Only later did I begin to read and believe that after 1953 everything went into decline. I mean governance. Something like that.
    I forgot, SVO, now this scum is running along 404, largely thanks to Khrushchev.
  85. -2
    1 December 2025 09: 22
    Quote: cast iron
    Do you need me to remind you that tens of thousands of communists were killed by the "civilized" Germans because they were communists?

    And do you need to be reminded how many Russians those communists killed during the Civil War? A war that those same communists unleashed? Unleashed against Russians whose only sin was that they weren't communists???
    1. +1
      1 December 2025 10: 06
      There are no clear statistics on who killed how many during the Civil War. Everyone had their fun. And it's time to learn, my friend, that there is nothing more terrible than civil wars. This is what world history teaches us.
    2. +1
      1 December 2025 17: 54
      The war that these same communists unleashed?


      The Whites started the civil war after losing power. This is a historical fact.

      Untied with the Russian People, whose only sin was that they were not communists?


      They fought the bourgeoisie and their hangers-on, who profited from World War I, from the deaths, and from all working people in general. And you, a fan of the Russian bourgeoisie, won't sell us any lies here. Many people here learn history not from television, but from far more authoritative sources.
  86. 0
    1 December 2025 10: 04
    No one will stop this. Kadyrov runs the country and that's it. What we're writing here is just a way to let off steam. The government supports both the Russian Caliphate and the Spiritual Administration of Muslims.
  87. 0
    1 December 2025 10: 10
    The Russian authorities are preoccupied with everything but their direct responsibility to serve the people. It's easier to invent a new tax or help Gazprom and Rosneft pay off their debts than to address what really worries the people. Therefore, there will be no new laws against public prayer or anything related to it. Furthermore, creeping Islamization in Russia is a way for the authorities to weaken the people and society. As long as Russians and non-Russians alike are preoccupied with themselves, they won't have time for wages, education, housing, or healthcare. And the authorities will continue to rob all the peoples of Russia. Corruption is what will kill Russia. Listen to what Matviyenko, Putin, Gref, Nabiullina, Sechin, and our other leaders say on open air. In short, the leader doesn't care about the problems of the Indians. Well, you and we can continue to scribble on VO, writing your comments. Something like that, ha, ha.
  88. 0
    1 December 2025 12: 31
    Quote: roosei
    And it's time to learn, my friend, that there is nothing more terrible than civil wars. This is what world history teaches us.

    That's exactly what I'm talking about, my friend. Civil war is the most terrible thing that can happen in the history of a state and a people. But the communists, in the name and glory of their ideas, condemned their own homeland (or maybe not quite their own? Or not a homeland at all?, judging by the ethnic composition of the Bolshevik leaders?) to civil war. Could there be a more terrible crime?
    1. 0
      1 December 2025 17: 49
      First the Tsar, and then the bourgeoisie who seized power, condemned the people to civil war. It was the Czechoslovak Corps that started the civil war in Russia. The Bolsheviks didn't start it. You're either uneducated on this matter, or a provocateur and liar, an anti-Soviet.
  89. 0
    1 December 2025 17: 51
    As long as this generation born in the 50s and 60s, who refuse to retire, is in power, there will be no changes.
  90. 0
    2 December 2025 05: 39
    Teenagers with fractures, as well as a man with bleeding, were forced to wait while a "trauma doctor" performed a masturbation at a Russian hospital. Now that's some news... And, by the way, the head doctor didn't punish the graduate of the "Okay, Gugal-nama" academy for such a gross violation. On the contrary, he decided to adjust the duty schedule to accommodate the Wahhabi's need to perform his ritual. Russian Muslims have never acted this way, and they never will. The fact that our hospitals are currently filled with cannibalistic Wahhabis from Third World countries is already part of the genocide of the local population. One of its main components.
  91. 0
    2 December 2025 09: 14
    Quote: cast iron
    You are either illiterate in this matter, or a provocateur and a liar, an anti-Soviet.

    First of all, my dear sir, let me inform you that well-mannered people address strangers and people they don’t know well as “you”.
    Moreover, as far as I understand, by expressing a point of view on historical facts that differs from yours, I in no way insulted you, so why do you consider yourself entitled to insult me?
    As I understand from your posts, rudeness is your only response to something you disagree with. I feel so sorry for you...