"Faces of the Civil War." Sergei Ulagai serving in the Tsarist army.

7 724 78
"Faces of the Civil War." Sergei Ulagai serving in the Tsarist army.
S. G. Ulagay in a photograph taken around 1920.


In the article "Faces of the Civil War"We also examined some of the reasons for the defeat of the White armies. One of these was the behavior of the White Guards, which shocked even the most rational representatives of the Entente countries and even some of Denikin's generals. Major General William Sidney Graves, commander of the American Expeditionary Force in Siberia and the Far East, in his book "America's Siberian Adventure," directly called Kolchak's army a "retreating band," and wrote of Grigory Semyonov, the "Supreme Ruler of Russia's Eastern Borderlands" and Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of the Far East and the Irkutsk Military District, that he:



He openly boasted that he couldn’t sleep peacefully if he hadn’t killed at least someone during the day.

The "Armed Forces of Southern Russia," led by Denikin, were called "roving armies without popular support or rear services" by military representatives of the Entente countries. And the White Guard General I. Belyaev lamented in his memoirs:

The entire rear was engulfed by a hostile peasant movement. Punitive detachments, floggings and robberies without trial, reprisals, the return of embittered landowners to their nests—all this created a dire atmosphere of impending catastrophe.

In recent articles, we discussed such notorious figures of the White Terror as Andrei Shkura (Shkuro), Konstantin Mamantov (Mamontov), ​​and Grigory Semyonov. Now it's time to point out that even within the White ranks, there were rare exceptions to the rule. Let's talk about the commander of the Second Kuban Cossack Corps, Sergei Georgievich Ulagay. Colonel I. M. Kalinin wrote about him in his memoir, "Under the Banner of Wrangel: Notes of a Former Military Prosecutor":

Ulagay neither robs himself nor gives to others.

The caustic Yakov Slashchev was known for his criticism of other White generals. He also routinely took a dig at Ulagay, calling him "an honest man, certainly, but without a broad military education." He also called him a "moonshining general." The fact is that in August 1918, Ulagay ordered a food train to be allowed into starving Petrograd, but confiscated three train cars of sugar: he exchanged it from the local population for moonshine, which he sent to the Sanitary Directorate of the Military Forces of Southern Russia. But Slashchev also called Ulagay "a popular Kuban general, it seems..." the only from the “famous” who have not stained themselves with robbery.”

Wrangel, as we've already mentioned in previous articles, couldn't stand Shkuro and Mamantov, considering both sadists and marauders harmful to the White cause (and Shkuro, a drunkard, to boot). But he had a completely different opinion of Ulagay:

An excellent cavalry commander, aware of the situation, brave and decisive, he could work miracles at the head of the Cossack cavalry, demonstrating timely personal initiative and resourcefulness.

However, he also noted some shortcomings:

I knew his negative qualities - lack of ability to organize, the ability to easily switch from high spirits to despondency.

Major General Afrikan Bogaevsky, who replaced Krasnov as ataman of the Great Don Host, described Ulagay as a brave and modest man. Colonel M.V. Mezernitsky also spoke highly of him (though he offered completely disparaging descriptions of Wrangel, Shkuro, Kutepov, Shatilov, and Vitkovsky):

Ulagay is a deeply honest, decent man, an excellent leader and an infinitely brave officer.

Let's start the story in order.

The origin and early life of an atypical white general


Sergei Georgievich Ulagai was a representative of an old Circassian-Shapsug noble family and was born on October 19 (31), 1875. There is no exact data about his place of birth: the village of Klyuchevaya (currently the city of Goryachy Klyuch), the Slobozhansky (near Kharkov) cities of Chuguev (his father Islam-Girey Shekhimovich, baptized Georgy Viktorovich Ulagai, served here) and Oboyan (where his mother lived) are mentioned.

The father of the article's subject was a combat officer who began serving in 1851. He took part in the Caucasian War and was awarded the "Badge of Distinction of the Military Order of St. George, 4th Class for Muslims." In 1861, he was promoted to staff captain.

In 1871, he applied for the "demarcation" of 400 dessiatines of land in the Kuban region. A positive response was received only in May 1876, and the land was allocated on the Belaya River in the Maykop district of the Kuban region. However, the Russo-Turkish War of 1877-1878 prevented him from taking ownership. Before the war began, in 1874, Ulagay married Olga Ivanovna von Ammerech (according to other sources, Alimert), the daughter of a retired lieutenant colonel of Courland German descent. The marriage was conditional on the groom's conversion to Christianity.

In October of the same year, the couple's eldest son, Anatoly (sometimes called Appolinary), was born. He would serve in the Second Khopersky Regiment of the Kuban Cossack Army and would die in November 1903 during a cavalry competition.

In October 1875, as we recall, the hero of this article was born. Then came the war with Turkey, during which Georgiy Viktorovich Ulagay was killed near the town of Elena (at the foot of Stara Planina) and, as a sign of his services, was posthumously promoted to colonel. In 1879, his widow apparently succeeded in obtaining the lands allocated to him in the Maykop district. Her sons attended the Mikhailovsky Cadet Corps in Voronezh. It is worth noting that, over the years, this institution's graduates included the weapons engineer S. I. Mosin, the inventor of the incandescent light bulb A. N. Lodygin, the Marxist G. V. Plekhanov, the Bolshevik V. A. Antonov-Ovseenko, and the cavalry general and ataman of the Great Don Army A. M. Kaledin. It should be noted that this corps was abolished in 1918, but was “revived” in 1992.


The building of the Voronezh Mikhailovsky Cadet Corps in a photograph from the late 19th – early 20th centuries.

Sergei Ulagay completed his training in 1895, but as early as 1893, at his mother's request, he and his older brother were enlisted in the Kuban Cossack Host and assigned to the village of Klyuchevaya. Sergei Ulagay then studied in the so-called "Cossack Hundred" of the Nikolaev Cavalry School—the former School of Guards Ensigns and Cavalry Junkers. The section for cadets of other branches of the cavalry was called a "squadron."


Cadets of the Cossack Hundred of the Nikolaev Cavalry School

Theoretical classes for the Hundred and Squadron cadets were conducted jointly, while practical classes were conducted separately. Training lasted two years, and cadets were divided into those receiving state funding and those receiving their own funding. Cadets who graduated with first-class honors (an average score of 8 in military science and at least 6 in other subjects) were promoted to cornet or (Cossacks) ensign—both in the Guards with one year of seniority. Those with second-class honors (7 and 5 points, respectively) received the rank of cornet or ensign without seniority. Third-class cadets graduated as non-commissioned officers or Cossack sergeants, but after six months they could be promoted to officer rank at the request of the unit commander.

Among the graduates of this educational institution were many famous figures, although not all of them achieved fame in the military field. Among them are Mikhail Lermontov, Pyotr Semyonov-Tyan-Shansky, Dmitry Skobelev (father of the famous "White General"), Pyotr Wrangel, Minister of War Vladimir Sukhomlinov, the infamous Carl Mannerheim, Afrikan Bogaevsky (who replaced P. Krasnov as ataman of the Great Don Army), Alexander Dutov, Vladimir Kappel, and Andrei Shkura (Shkuro). This school was known for its "tsuk" system: junior cadets were called "extreme beasts" and were required to "listen to and obey senior cadets, who instructed them in the traditions established at the school." And the famous "Smoking Room Order," which was read at the initiation of "special beasts," according to legend, was written by Lermontov himself, but was later expanded to reflect new trends. It began with the words:

Beasts, pure beasts - tailed, furry, feathered!

And then came a list of demands:

Remember, beasts, that by entering the glorious Guards School, you become a pitiful imitation of its cadets! Therefore, true beasts, you must remember the lofty dignity entrusted to you and do everything possible to ensure that you do not in any way degrade the honor bestowed upon you! Therefore, you must...


A modern photograph of the façade of the building that housed the Nikolaev Cavalry School. In front of it is a monument to Leromntov.

The beginning of military service


After graduating from the Nikolaev Cavalry School, the subject of this article, with the rank of ensign, was sent to the Khoper Cossack Regiment, and by June 1901, he had been promoted to sotnik. In 1903, he took part in horse races at the Moscow Hippodrome. One of the participants in these competitions was Yakov Fyodorovich Gillenshmidt, then a staff captain of the Guards Horse.artillery Brigade, during World War I he would become commander of the Fourth Cavalry Corps, where S. Ulagay would serve. In 1918, Lieutenant General J. Gillenshmidt would be killed in a battle during the Volunteer Army's retreat from Yekaterinodar.

At the outbreak of the Russo-Japanese War, S. Ulagay was part of the Kuban Cossack Division, which was stationed in Warsaw and used as an escort for the commander of the military district. He managed to secure permission to be assigned to one of the Cossack regiments. The most commonly cited place of his service is the First Argun Regiment of the Transbaikal Cossack Host. However, some believe he may have served in the First Nerchinsk or Terek-Kuban Regiments. It is only known that in May 1904, S. Ulagay was wounded in the chest "in a skirmish near the village of Dapu" (and classified as "third-class wounded").

He was awarded the Order of St. Anne, 4th Class, with the inscription "for bravery." During this war, S. Ulagay also received the Order of St. Anne, 3rd Class, the Order of St. Stanislav, 3rd Class with swords, the Order of St. Stanislav, 2nd Class with swords and bow, and the Order of St. Vladimir, 4th Class with swords and bow. Note the constant inscription "with swords": this indicates that these orders were awarded specifically for military merit. In April 1905, Sergei Ulagay was promoted to the rank of podesaul.

After the war ended, he returned to Warsaw, where he served in the First Hundred of the aforementioned Kuban Division (consisting of three hundreds), holding the position of head of the farm, and on August 29, 1907, became a member of the divisional court. The 1909 performance appraisal states:

Podesaul Ulagay knows and loves military affairs very well, is a dashing horseman, can teach the lower ranks everything not only by story but also by personal example, loves horses and is passionate about racing.

In October 1913, Sergei Ulagay received the position of commander of the second hundred of his division.

Sergei Ulagay during World War I



Cossack junction

Ulagay entered the new war as part of the same Kuban Division, which served as a convoy escort for the army headquarters and corps headquarters. Nevertheless, on November 11, 1914, the division's Cossacks, led by the subject of this article, distinguished themselves in a battle near the village of Radogosh, for which Ulagay was awarded the Order of St. Anna, 2nd Class with Swords. He eventually secured a transfer to the Caucasian Native Division, where he served for only two months, and then, on July 20, 1915, to the First Line Regiment of General Velyaminov of the Kuban Cossack Host. This unit was part of the Second Combined Cossack Division, commanded by the infamous Pyotr Krasnov, the future head of the Cossack Affairs Directorate of the Third Reich's Eastern Ministry.

By this time, S. Ulagay had already attained the rank of Yesaul, and in the First Line Regiment, he had risen to the rank of troop starshina—but he did not have a permanent position, as he was only listed as an attached officer. He was usually given one-off assignments, during which he commanded two or three specially assigned companies. Most often, at this time, he had to cover the retreat of other Russian units. In one battle, which took place on September 17, 1915, near the villages of Kukhotskaya and Volya, S. Ulagay, "commanding four companies of dismounted Cossacks, under intense effective fire, rushed at the head of the companies onto the enemy trenches, thereby contributing to the restoration of our entire previously shaken position." He was awarded the Order of St. George, 4th Class.

By the way, V. Serebryannikov in his book “Sociology of War” claims that during the First World War, the Cossack troops suffered the greatest losses in the Russian army.

In May 1916, the 1st Line Regiment took part in the famous Brusilov (Lutsk) breakthrough.


P. Ryzhenko. Brusilov Offensive

It should be noted that, according to the command's plans, the 4th Cavalry Corps was supposed to engage in battle after the infantry units had broken through the front line—to strike at Kovel. However, the infantry units were unable to break through in this sector, so dismounted Cossacks were sent to assist. In one battle, three Cossack squadrons commanded by Ulagay, drawing infantry units along with them, crossed the Stokhid River on horseback. In the ensuing battle, three lines of enemy trenches were captured, although they were forced to abandon them by the afternoon. Later, some Cossack units were redeployed to the Lutsk sector, where infantry units managed to breach the Austrian defenses.

By autumn, active hostilities had ceased, with local battles raging along the front line. The 1st Line Regiment, in which Ulagay served, was then quartered for the winter near the village of Leshnevskie Zakhody. In January 1917, Sergei Ulagay received the Gold St. George Cross. weapon – the seventh in his regiment. His high standing can also be judged by the fact that he was the chairman of the regimental court at the time. The minutes of one of the hearings have survived, at which Cossack I. Kurbatov of the 1st Company was sentenced to three months of solitary confinement in a military prison for stealing 49 rubles from a private in the engineer work squad named Telegin. However, the execution of the sentence was postponed until the end of the war.

Incidentally, we remember that Sergei Ulagay was seriously wounded in his very first battle during the Russo-Japanese War. But during World War I, he didn't even suffer a slight concussion, despite never hiding behind his subordinates.

Overall, we see that at the time of the February Revolution, 41-year-old Army Sergeant Major (equivalent to lieutenant colonel in the army) Sergei Ulagay was not exactly a shining example. He was a proactive and courageous officer, but just one among many. His path to the top was blocked by incompetent members of "noble" families. Ironically, it was the revolution itself that allowed his talents to blossom, the very thing he chose to fight against. Unfortunately, he chose the wrong side: in the Red Army, he could have been far more useful to our country and become an outstanding high-ranking military leader, like Frunze, Budyonny, Yegorov, Voroshilov, and many others.

S. Ulagay after the February Revolution


In late March 1917, G. Yevseyev, commander of the 1st Line Cossack Regiment and known for his monarchist leanings, was effectively dismissed under the pretext of a vacation. For only two weeks, the duties of the regiment's commander were fulfilled by the senior sergeant major Ulagay, who was promoted to army colonel on the occasion. Then, in early May 1917, he became temporary commander of the 2nd Zaporozhian Regiment. Meanwhile, after the issuance of the notorious "Order No. 1," the army rapidly deteriorated. The Cossack regiments were no exception. Krasnov himself wrote:

The Cossacks... began to rapidly disintegrate. Meetings began, with the most outrageous resolutions being passed. Demands were rejected, but the Cossacks themselves began to implement them. The Cossacks stopped grooming and regularly feeding their horses. Any kind of occupation was out of the question. A mass of over four thousand people, most between the ages of 21 and 30—that is, strong, vigorous, and healthy, and not drawn into daily, hard labor—wandered around all day with nothing to do, began drinking, and began to misbehave.

S. Ulagay, who had taken command of the 2nd Zaporozhian Regiment, faced similar problems while attempting to maintain the remnants of discipline. In late August 1917, Colonel S.G. Ulagay supported General L. Kornilov's failed uprising. As a result, Ulagay was not only removed from command of the regiment but also arrested, and was released after the Provisional Government was dispersed by the Bolsheviks.

In the next article, we will continue the story and discuss Sergei Ulagay's activities during the civil war and his life in exile.
78 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +14
    28 November 2025 04: 59
    Thank you, Valery!

    Each educational institution has its own traditions.

    And when chaos begins, it is completely unknown what can survive.
  2. +20
    28 November 2025 06: 13
    A crowd of over four thousand people, most of them between the ages of 21 and 30, i.e. strong, fit and healthy, and not involved in daily hard work, hung around all day without doing anything, and began to drink and misbehave.
    As a person who served his mandatory military service, I completely agree with Krasnov here.
    Thank you, Valery!
    1. +7
      28 November 2025 06: 35
      There are various systems for filling life.

      Some leaders achieve perfection in this art.
      1. +6
        28 November 2025 06: 50
        There are various systems for filling life.
        That's what we think now, with the benefit of hindsight. However, hindsight...
        1. +5
          28 November 2025 07: 29
          That's our advantage. However, there are many good things about life in your twenties, too.
          1. +6
            28 November 2025 08: 58
            Quote from Korsar4
            However, there are also many good things in life in your thirties.

            EVERYTHING is fine there...
            1. +8
              28 November 2025 11: 34
              The modern generation of 20-30 year olds has it no easier than ours.
              1. +11
                28 November 2025 12: 10
                Quote from Korsar4
                The modern generation of 20-30 year olds has it no easier than ours.

                Of course, it's even more difficult. But the trees are big, the grass is green, and the girls are still young...
                How it is with us...
      2. +5
        29 November 2025 15: 19
        Quote from Korsar4
        There are various systems for filling life.

        Yeah. No matter what a soldier does, as long as he's... really tired! feel
    2. +25
      28 November 2025 09: 26
      "A soldier without a job is a potential offender or even a criminal!"
      Chief of Staff of the 62nd Pogo KTP, Major K.V. Totsky
      1. +27
        28 November 2025 11: 04
        An honest child loves cream-filled cones, not mom and dad. An honest sailor doesn't want to serve, but to sleep. Therefore, he must be forced to serve. An uncoward sailor is prone to mischief; he is a potential criminal, a future murderer and rapist.
        Rear Admiral V.G. Dobroskochenko. Previously, he was commander of the 7th Special Squadron, commander of the 44th Dragoon Plough, commander of the 170th Brigade Plough, and commander of the large antisubmarine ship "Admiral Nakhimov."
        1. +3
          29 November 2025 10: 47
          If an honest sailor sleeps during the day, then what does he do at night?
          In general, you can even fall asleep while watching a movie.
      2. 0
        5 December 2025 23: 55
        "From an unbuttoned button to a crime is just one step!"
    3. +17
      28 November 2025 09: 30
      Even 8-12 people sitting in one workshop without doing anything for three days can easily start get drunk and misbehave.
      If they have access to stores selling alcohol or private sector stores where they sell "moonshine or alcohol."
      1. +10
        29 November 2025 15: 21
        Or to devices for which alcohol-containing liquids are required for servicing)))
      2. +7
        29 November 2025 18: 55
        Even 8-12 people sitting in one workshop
        I can say that even two or three people is already a hundred percent guarantee, especially if they are between 18 and 25.
        1. +7
          29 November 2025 19: 18
          Men over 25 don't give a 100% guarantee?
  3. +18
    28 November 2025 08: 26
    1. The so-called "tsuk" was primarily a feature of the Nikolaev School. It was completely absent from the Mikhailovsky School and was discouraged there. Some compare the tsuk to hazing in the modern army.
    But that's not true. The main difference was that physical violence against individuals was strictly prohibited. This was also due to the fact that it undermined the cadet's honor. And this was punished very harshly. Of course, waking a boy, torn from home and mother, at night to have him name members of the royal family was harsh, but on the other hand, it forged the spirit of a Russian officer. It's no wonder Leo Tolstoy admired the bearing of the cadets of the Nikolaevsky School.
    2. I'll express my opinion. It would be nice to reinstate the "swords" to our modern orders. And to award them only to those who actually took part in combat on the battlefield. It's unclear where this or that individual was hanging out in the SVO, but he managed to get himself a medal and, damn it, he's also a participant and veteran.
    And bring back the soldiers' St. George's Crosses and let them be awarded by soldiers' St. George's Committees. Who knows better than the soldiers who deserves what?
    And one more thing... Personally, I value the Officer's Cross of St. George above the Hero's Star! We've given the Hero's Star to all sorts of people! To heroes and scoundrels alike! But the Officer's Cross of St. George is awarded only for military merit and personal bravery!
    1. +5
      28 November 2025 09: 29
      You also need to go there immediately, rummage around and get yourself a medal. What kind of words are you talking about, "rummage around, get yourself a medal," and you're also a damn participant - a veteran. Your idea may be correct, but somehow it all sounds wrong and offensive.
    2. +5
      28 November 2025 13: 24
      We've given the Hero's Star to just about everyone! To heroes and scoundrels alike! And the Officer's Cross of St. George is reserved for military service and personal bravery!

      Uh-huh, does Albrecht Friedrich Rudolf mean anything to you? Or doesn't it bother you that alongside him, Wilhelm I and Alexander II were also awarded the Cross of St. George, First Class?
      Not so simple.
      1. +3
        28 November 2025 16: 06
        The royals have their own toys and concepts!
        Let's compare another example. How many Knights of St. George from World War I defected to the Kaiser's army, and how many from the GSS defected to Hitler's army.
        Just don't mix up WWI and WWII! Specifically, in terms of the time period they were separated into.
        We often forget that the Volunteer Corps in WWII were citizens of other countries, not the Soviet Union. Some fought for the Germans, and some against them.
      2. +4
        28 November 2025 17: 07
        Russian tsars received everything immediately. By birth. So that there would be no temptation to take it later. The same, by convention, applied to other monarchs. If this was taken for granted, then so be it. That's how it was, and everyone knew why. And no one would ever think of reproaching the monarchs for this. To accuse them of anything from the outside was simply ridiculous. That was theirs anyway.
      3. +4
        28 November 2025 17: 08
        Quote: Kote Pan Kokhanka
        We've given the Hero's Star to just about everyone! To heroes and scoundrels alike! And the Officer's Cross of St. George is reserved for military service and personal bravery!

        Uh-huh, does Albrecht Friedrich Rudolf mean anything to you? Or doesn't it bother you that alongside him, Wilhelm I and Alexander II were also awarded the Cross of St. George, First Class?
        Not so simple.

        You're apparently confusing the Order of St. George, awarded to officers and generals, with the Officer's Cross of St. George with a Laurel Branch, awarded to officers who distinguished themselves in battle at the request of soldiers. It was an honorary award.
        1. VLR
          +5
          28 November 2025 18: 53
          St. George's Cross with a laurel branch, awarded to officers who distinguished themselves in battle at the request of soldiers

          It seems they only started issuing these after the February Revolution. Before then, soldiers, of course, weren't allowed to participate in the distribution of awards. Denikin later lamented in his memoirs abroad: "We treated the soldiers very badly, didn't consider them human beings, and posted notices that "dogs and lower ranks are not allowed." And the offended soldiers, as soon as they could, began to massacre the officers. Without any instructions from the Bolsheviks."
      4. +2
        29 November 2025 15: 33
        Quote: Kote pane Kohanka
        Or does it not bother you that, along with him, Wilhelm I and Alexander II were awarded the Knight of the Cross of St. George, First Class?

        To be honest, I don’t know why Wilhelm was awarded the Order of St. George, 1st class, in 1869, but Alexander II received it (okay, he awarded it to himself) apparently for the Russo-Turkish War of 1877-78.
        But that's okay, under his father, George, you could get a 4th class medal for 25 years of impeccable service.
    3. +3
      29 November 2025 09: 11
      "Tsuk" was typical mainly for the Nikolaevsky School. It was completely absent from the Mikhailovsky School.

      I looked at that part of the article again. It doesn't mention anything about the "tsuk" in other schools. And it's still basically a form of hazing. And bullying young cadets has nothing to do with posture. That's what drill instructors did.
      1. 0
        29 November 2025 12: 24
        I never said they did! Hazing is a form of physical intimidation, a form of willpower and morale-breaking for a young soldier. It fosters malice and a sense of lawlessness. Something that didn't exist in the Imperial Military Schools. And, by the way, it didn't exist in the Soviet Army of my time either. At our school, when new cadets arrived, our interaction with them was kept to a minimum.
        1. +1
          29 November 2025 15: 22
          When I entered the academy, my second and third years were filled with classmates from different schools. Some of my classmates were relatives a year or two older, others were acquaintances. It wasn't that there wasn't hazing, and the older students could easily "stand in" for the younger ones if necessary. A military brotherhood was fostered. I love my academy.
          1. 0
            29 November 2025 15: 27
            Fitting in, that's for sure! If there was a fight with the townspeople, everyone would come out! 😄
        2. 0
          29 November 2025 19: 00
          And by the way, it wasn’t there in the Soviet army of my time either.
          Hazing always exists, and not only in the army, the forms are just slightly different.
    4. +7
      29 November 2025 15: 23
      Quote from Songwolf
      The so-called "tsuk" was characteristic mainly of the Nikolaevsky school.

      To one degree or another it was present in everyone, but the main breeding ground was, perhaps, the Corps of Pages.
  4. BAI
    +2
    28 November 2025 08: 37
    : in the Red Army he could have brought much more benefit to our country and become an outstanding high-ranking military leader, like Frunze, Budyonny, Yegorov, Voroshilov and many others.

    And most likely, he would have been shot in 1937.
    1. 0
      29 November 2025 12: 25
      Even earlier... In the "Spring" case. Everyone loves the movie "Officers." But read the book the movie is based on!
  5. -2
    28 November 2025 08: 48
    military representatives of the Entente countries called them "roving armies"


    The author is silent about how the Reds were characterized. lol
    We will help: Poletika:
    bitterness, bragging, thirst for revenge, cruelty, ruthlessness, a penchant for gold and jewelry, for moonshine and reckless drivers, for "Maruskas" and "fat-faced Katkas"... The first days of Bolshevik rule in Kyiv were full of horror and bloodshed.
    and so forth

    Unfortunately, he chose the wrong side: in the Red Army he could have brought much more to our country.there is benefit and become an outstanding high-ranking military leader, like Frunze, Budyonny, Yegorov, Voroshilov
    That's the side he chose, that's the side he stayed alive and wasn't trampled underfoot like Blucher, Tukhachevsky, Yegorov and the FAMILY.

    Regarding "outstanding" lol chiefs who brought "benefits": or "Voroshilov, who did not have a military education, but had an Academy. lol General Staff...HIS name, received a derogatory assessment from his comrades:
    On the work of Comrade Voroshilov: Resolution of the Central Committee of the All-Union Communist Party (Bolsheviks) (1942)

    1. The war with Finland in 1939–1940 revealedand the great inadequacy and backwardness of the leadership of the People's Commissariat of Defense. During this war, the unpreparedness of the People's Commissariat of Defense became apparent. to ensure the successful development of military operationsThe Red Army lacked mortars and machine guns, There was no proper inventory of aircraft and tanks, the troops lacked adequate winter clothing, and they lacked concentrated food supplies. Significant neglect was revealed in the work of such important departments of the People's Commissariat of Defense as the Main Artillery Directorate (GAU), the Combat Training Directorate, the Air Force Directorate, and the poor organization of military educational institutions. All this resulted in the war being prolonged and led to unnecessary casualties.

    Comrade Voroshilov, being at that time the People's Commissar of Defense, was forced to admit at the Plenum of the Central Committee of the All-Union Communist Party (Bolsheviks) at the end of March 1940 that failure of its leadership.

    Taking into account the state of affairs in the People's Commissariat of Defense and seeing that it is difficult for Comrade Voroshilov to cover such large issues as the People's Commissariat of Defense, the Central Committee of the All-Union Communist Party (Bolsheviks) considered it necessary to release Comrade Voroshilov from the post of People's Commissar of Defense.

    2. At the beginning of the war with Germany, Comrade Voroshilov was appointed commander-in-chief of the North-Western direction, which has its main task of defending Leningrad. As it turned out later, Comrade Voroshilov did not cope with the assigned task and was unable to organize the defense of Leningrad. In view of all this, the State Defense Committee recalled Comrade [p.136] Voroshilov from Leningrad and gave him work on new military formations in the rear.

    3. At the request of Comrade Voroshilov, he was sent in February (1942) to the Volkhov Front as a representative of the Headquarters to assist the Front Command and stayed there for about a month. However, Comrade Voroshilov's stay on The Volkhov Front did not produce the desired results
    .

    But he managed to destroy the top of the Red Army - here on horseback.
    It would be better if the Voroshilovs emigrated...

    Regarding their successes in the Civil War, Stalin said:
    "Civil war is NOT a real war"
    1. +4
      28 November 2025 13: 30
      You're talking about Voroshilov again. bully, and again I will remind you about Nicholas II, who did not study in any educational institution, and home school teachers did not have the right to question the heir on the material covered bully
      1. VLR
        +6
        28 November 2025 18: 17
        Absolutely correct. Nicholas II's teachers were good, but since they weren't allowed to ask questions, the extent to which he mastered the material remained unknown. However, it is known that the complete works of Nicholas II were withdrawn from stores due to the extremely poor quality of the material—it gave readers the impression of the emperor's low intellectual level.
        And here is what the father of the "Black Baron" - N.E. Wrangel wrote in the book *Memories: from serfdom to the Bolsheviks":
        "Tsar Nicholas II reigned, was Supreme Commander-in-Chief, but he didn't rule the state, didn't command the army, and didn't know how to be an autocrat. He was useless, weak-willed, and completely self-absorbed. He clung to the throne, but couldn't hold on to it and became a pawn in the hands of his hysterical wife.
        1. VLR
          +6
          28 November 2025 18: 19
          And this is an excerpt from the memoirs of N.A. Velyaminov, the attending physician of Alexander III:
          "I watched the heir and the role he played in the family with particular interest in Livadia. I must say that even then I was surprised by his youth, not
          appropriate to his age... Count Vorontsov ... told me that the heir, who was 26 years old, was in fact a boy of 14; if this was an exaggeration, it was not by much...
          and, I won’t hide, this scared me for our future.”
        2. 0
          28 November 2025 18: 29
          Quote: VlR
          And here is what the father of the "black baron" - N.E. Wrangel wrote in the book *Memories: from serfdom to the Bolsheviks":

          Dear author! N. E. Wrangel hated Russia, both Bolshevik and Tsarist – he was a very shady character.
          Alexandra Feodorovna was not a hysterical woman, how many times can I repeat it, it’s the same thing.
          1. VLR
            +4
            28 November 2025 18: 40
            There's too much evidence of Alix's hysteria, including from high-ranking dignitaries. And all from haters of Russia? Former Minister of Public Education Ivan Tolstoy described Alexandra Feodorovna this way in February 1913:
            "The young empress in a chair, in a haggard pose, all red as a peony, with almost crazy eyes."

            Others write that it got to the point where her own daughters publicly reprimanded and restrained their mother, who was on the verge of hysteria. Yusupov wrote that Alexandra's psyche was based on Rasputin, and Nicholas II told Fredericks:
            Better Rasputin than the Empress's endless hysterics
            .
            Sergei Witte wrote that the emperor:
            “He married... a completely abnormal woman who took him into her hands, which was not difficult given his lack of willpower.”

            Even young Alix's psychosomatics were completely destroyed. She constantly blushed, struggled for breath, and her legs gave out due to nerves. On the eve of the wedding, Nikolai took his bride for walks in a wheelchair.
            1. VLR
              +5
              28 November 2025 18: 49
              Here is the testimony of the maid of honor and close friend of the Empress Anna Vyrubova: she recalled that Alexandra Feodorovna’s hands often turned blue, and she began to choke.
              Nicholas II's sister Xenia Alexandrovna wrote on January 11, 1910 that the empress was being worried
              "She has severe heart pain and has become very weak. They say it's a nervous issue."
    2. +5
      28 November 2025 17: 10
      Any war exposes the shortcomings of any army. The exception is the German one of the 20th century.
      It would be better to count what was done under Voroshilov and compare it with the Tsar's absolute generals.
      The People's Commissar of Defense is a political, organizational position, but not a military one. The army is not commanded by the People's Commissar or the Minister of Defense.
      1. -1
        28 November 2025 21: 34
        Quote: MCmaximus
        It would be better to count what was DONE under Voroshilov

        The Politburo decision clearly states:that..

        There is even more in the Act of Transfer of the Ministry of Defense from May 1940.
        1. +4
          29 November 2025 04: 54
          The damned Bolsheviks honestly wrote that act. Now take any Tsarist minister. And what did he leave behind?
          1. -5
            29 November 2025 09: 10
            Quote: MCmaximus
            The damned Bolsheviks honestly wrote that act. Now take any Tsarist minister. And what did he leave behind?

            The "honest" ones hid this Act from the citizens... And therein lie the causes of the most terrible military catastrophe of the 41 world war. No tsarist minister would have done such a thing.
            1. +1
              29 November 2025 15: 41
              No tsarist minister did such a thing.
              - for example, General-Admiral Romanov A.A. bully
            2. +1
              1 December 2025 06: 23
              I'm always curious how they point to 1941 at the Bolsheviks, but say nothing about 45. And, Budeokhrusty, don't you want to say anything about 1916 and 17? Why were half the military for peace?
              1. -2
                1 December 2025 08: 42
                Quote: MCmaximus
                They point to 1941 at the Bolsheviks, but they don't say anything. about the 45th

                in 41-45 27 million citizens died = an incredible price
                Quote: MCmaximus
                Why were half of the military for peace?

                all for peace not at the cost of giving up a third of Russia to the occupiers=what the bone crunchers don't understand.
    3. The comment was deleted.
    4. VLR
      +6
      28 November 2025 18: 33
      Stalin said:
      "Civil war is NOT a real war

      In ancient Rome, triumphs weren't awarded for victory in civil war, and rightly so. It was immoral to award a reward to one brother for the murder of another. And such cases did exist. Take, for example, the Inovs: the father, a general, and one of his sons sided with the Reds, while his other son was an associate of the "black ataman" Annenkov.
      But the question can and should be raised: who exactly starts a civil war? In Russia, after the October Revolution, the civil war was unequivocally started by the Whites, led by Kornilov, who fled to the Don. They "opened Pandora's box." And then the escalation spiraled.
      1. -7
        28 November 2025 20: 04
        Quote: VlR
        But the question can and should be raised: who exactly starts a civil war? In Russia, after the October Revolution, the civil war was unequivocally started by the Whites, led by Kornilov, who fled to the Don. They "opened Pandora's box."


        Complete nonsense and ignorance of the FACTS - before the THB there was no GV, after it - it :immediately appeared: because people rebelled against usurpers and bandits, those who seized power by force . VOR-beginning of the Civil War, March 26, October-"
        This is GW!"


        Why should they submit to impostors who also lost the elections?

        Remember the Bolsheviks no one ever chose anything or entrusted them with anything: They were afraid of elections to the point of bedwetting and never held them for 70 years
        1. +7
          29 November 2025 05: 01
          Oops... And who are these temporary ones anyway? The legitimate authorities? The giants of the spirit?
          Maybe people had illusions back then. But now, when you see these Martovs, Lvovs, Kerenskys, Tereshchenkos, and Guchkovs... Are there really people who consider them capable of anything other than talk?
          That is, these clowns = the legitimate government and we just have to tolerate them.
          Voroshilov, for example, formed a workers' division. And led it, with its families, practically from the Whites' rear.
          Point to which of the temporary workers could form a single platoon with their chatter? And command them for a week.
          Under them, nothing remained of Russia within six months. The country simply fell apart. Under them. Not the Bolsheviks.
          1. VLR
            +7
            29 November 2025 06: 41
            Who are these temporary authorities anyway? The legitimate authority?

            These are precisely the "temporary" ones—usurpers. Imposters who came to power as a result of a coup d'état orchestrated by the British ambassador, Buchanan. People who broke their oath and betrayed the emperor. And then, in the space of a few months, destroyed both the army and a great country. The Bolsheviks, who had played no part in the February 1917 events, literally began to save the perishing country. And yet, they were surprisingly peaceable. The mood among the Bolshevik leadership was described in the first article in the series, "Faces of the Civil War." The heads of the Entente countries were ready to recognize the new government. Everything was ruined by counterrevolutionary generals who started a civil war. In which no one counted the victims and the country was awash in blood. And from this bloody pit, the devastated and humiliated Russia was pulled, then restored to practically its former borders and defended from all of Europe during World War II by the Bolsheviks. They saved the country at least twice. It was with great difficulty and some extreme measures, but without them, Russia would not be on the world map today.
            1. -7
              29 November 2025 09: 44
              Quote: VlR
              These are precisely the "temporary" ones - usurpers. Imposters,

              Lie - the Emperor entrusted Lvov with the creation of a government, and he became the head of the Supreme Command.

              Nikolai and Mikhail called for the subordination of the VP, The Soviets supported VP.
              Quote: VlR
              And then, in a few months, they destroyed both the army and the great country.

              The most destruction is after the VOR
              Quote: VlR
              The Bolsheviks, who took no part in the February events of 1917,

              Stalin is not respected in his Short Course - the Bolsheviks called for it, organized it and led it on the streets
              Quote: VlR
              They literally began to save the dying country.

              After the stupidest decrees and everything collapsed, independence and uprisings began everywhere.
              Quote: VlR
              The mood among the Bolshevik leadership was described in the first article of the series - "Faces of the Civil War"

              Lenin is more honest than you and openly admitted in January 1918:
              To all accusations of civil war we say: Yes, we have openly proclaimed what no government could proclaim... Yes, we have started and are waging a war against exploiters


              Why should these bandits who started the war be afraid?
              Quote: VlR
              And from this bloody pit, the ruined and humiliated Russia was pulled out, and then restored to practically its former borders and protected from the whole of Europe during World War II by the Bolsheviks.

              The Bolsheviks shoved it into this hole (it didn’t exist before them) and created NON-Russia - none of them considered the USSR to be Russia, its name erased from the world map..
              In WWII, the people defended the country, just like in 1812. In 1991, no one stood up for the Bolsheviks, including the Bolsheviks. lol
              .
              Quote: VlR
              Saved the country at least twice.

              killed twice in 17 and 91
              Quote: VlR
              If it weren't for them, Russia wouldn't be on the world map now.

              If it weren't for them, there wouldn't be any Mykolayiv cities instead of Russian Nikolayevs, and there wouldn't be a war, and there would be 50 million more Russians - that's the price of their "achievements"
              1. +7
                29 November 2025 10: 11
                Wow, your monarchism is driving you nuts. You write such nonsense, completely oblivious to the obvious. I even feel sorry for you, because unless it's about monarchism, you come across as a reasonable person. But as soon as you hear something about bloody Nicholas, the sadist Semyonov, or the moral monster Shkura, it blows my mind. In medicine, this is called "perverse thinking"—an obsessive-compulsive disorder. We have this Natalia Poklonskaya—a "cute-me-myash" prosecutor, a "tsarebozhnitsa" who was often forgiven because she supported the Crimean Spring. And who ruined her political career with the same caveman monarchism—she marched at the "Immortal Regiment" march on May 9th with a portrait of Nicholas II. And from a heroine, she turned into a freak.
                1. -7
                  29 November 2025 10: 17
                  Quote: vet
                  Wow, your monarchism is making you cringe. You write such nonsense, unaware of the obvious. I even feel sorry for you, somehow, because unless it's about monarchism, you come across as a reasonable person. But as soon as you hear something about bloody Nicholas, the sadist Semyonov, and the moral monster Shkura, it blows my mind. In medicine, this is called "perverse thinking"—an obsessive-compulsive disorder. We have this Natalia Poklonskaya—the "cute-myash" prosecutor, the "tsarebozhnitsa" who was forgiven a lot because she supported the Crimean Spring. And who ruined her political career with the same caveman monarchism—she walked at the "Immortal Regiment" march on May 9th with a portrait of Nicholas II. And from a heroine, she turned into a freak.

                  belay lol
                  Is that all you can say on the TOPIC of the article?
          2. -5
            29 November 2025 11: 59
            Quote: MCmaximus
            And who are these temporary authorities anyway? The legitimate authority?

            This is a legitimate temporary compromise that suits EVERYONE, supported by the SOVIETS
            Quote: MCmaximus
            That is, these clowns are the legitimate government and we just have to tolerate them.

            before the elections to the Ukrainian SSR.
            Quote: MCmaximus
            A Voroshilov

            one of the main reasons for the disaster 41
            Quote: MCmaximus
            The country simply fell apart. Under them. Not the Bolsheviks.

            Don't talk nonsense - the factories are worse, but they worked, the same with the railway, food, the front
            No independence. And in Germany, 800,000 died of hunger.

            EVERYTHING collapsed after VOR- front, factories, food, a bunch of independences - see maps, see production graphs, i.e. facts.

            You read WORKERS ::

            Declaration of the Extraordinary Meeting of Authorized Factories and Plants Petrograd. March 13, 1918 // Central State Archive of St. Petersburg. F. 3390, op. 1, d. 17, l. 56 ob.-57 ob. Originalbecause
            ..
            Councils that disagree with government policy are unceremoniously dispersed by armed force Petrograd workers have already done this more than once
            experienced shootings at their meetings and demonstrations
            .

            We were promised immediate peace, a democratic peace, concluded
            peoples over the heads of their governmentsBut in reality, we were given a shameful capitulation to the German imperialists..
            We have been given a peace that deals a severe blow to all workers.
            International and fatally striking the Russian workers' movement.
            We were given a world consolidating the collapse of Russia and making it
            the extraction of foreign capital, a world that is destroying our industry
            and shamefully betraying the interests of all the peoples who trusted
            Russian revolution. We were given a world in which we would not
            we even know the exact boundaries of our slavery, because the Bolshevik
            the government, which had shouted so much against secret diplomacy, itself
            practices the worst kind of diplomatic secrecy and, already leaving
            Petrograd still does not report the full and exact text of all
            conditions of peace, arbitrarily disposing of the destinies of the people, the state,
            revolution.

            We were promised bread. But in reality, we were given unprecedented hunger.
            they gave birth to a civil war, devastating the country and completely ruining it
            her farm.
            Under the guise of socialism they gave us the final
            the destruction of industry and the financial breakdown, we were given plunder
            national wealth and capital accumulated by people
            with an insatiable appetite. We were given a kingdom of bribery and speculation,
            which have reached unheard-of proportions. We were confronted with horrors
            long-term unemployment, depriving us of any means of real
            fight against it. Trade unions are destroyed, factory
            committees cannot protect us
            , the city council was dispersed,
            Cooperatives are being hindered.

            We were promised freedom. But what do we see in reality? Where is freedom?
            speech, meetings, unions, press, peaceful demonstrations? Everything is trampled
            police heels, everything crushed by an armed hand
            .
            On the anniversary of the revolution paid for with our blood, we again
            we see on ourselves the iron shackles of lawlessness

            See? Devastation, war, collapse—after the VORs, and it's not me who says this, but contemporaries.
    5. +6
      29 November 2025 00: 06
      Well, actually, while commanding the Northwestern Front, the troops under his command gave Germany's "best operational mind" (as Hitler described him), Manstein, a real beating at Soltsy. Manstein fled hundreds of kilometers. He abandoned all the secret staff documents, including those about plans to use chemical weapons against the residents of Leningrad.
      1. -7
        29 November 2025 09: 16
        Quote: Alexey Alekseev_5
        Well, actually, while commanding the North-Western direction, the troops under his command gave the "best operational mind" a good beating (t

        He didn't prepare it. But in general, we read the Politburo.
  6. -2
    28 November 2025 09: 21
    military representatives of the Entente countries called


    The Reds about their armies—and this is already 1920:

    "The Revolutionary Military Council of the Southern Front is receiving reports from the localities about the atrocities of the ongoingAsty of the 1st Cavalry Army, expressed in terrorizing the authorities, robberies, pogroms, and illegal requisitions and so on. In support of this, I cite excerpts from a telegram from the Kremenchug Provincial Headquarters dated October 15th: 'Units of the 2nd and 4th divisions of the 1st Cavalry Army, passing through the Cherkassy district, are terrorizing the authorities, robbing and shooting residents and even the families of those serving in the ranks of the Red Army, all the livestock is driven away, a mobilization of horses is organized, the last horse is taken from the peasant. Shouting 'Beat the Jews and Communists!' they rush through the villages and hamlets, there are dead and many wounded, including many Soviet workers. The families of Red Army soldiers, Soviet workers, Volvovoennoye Commissars, Chairman of the Revolutionary Committees, and Comnezamoye are subjected to complete plunder and beatings to within an inch of their lives. There are also cases of murder and execution of Jewish Soviet workers. The authorities and the population are fleeing in panic, hiding in the forests and fields. The results of the atrocities are already being felt; those villages that were on the side of the Soviet government and far from participating in banditry, now, on the contrary, harbor a terrible hatred for the red army and the Soviet government.
    To investigate this, the Cherkassky district chief appointed a commission of representatives from the military registration and enlistment office, the executive committee, and the Workers' and Peasants' Inspectorate."
    .
    Horses are being requisitioned from peasants. The requisitions are disorganized and essentially constitute simple robbery. Due to the absence or ineffectiveness of supply agencies, it is difficult to combat these abnormal phenomena. Commanding officers not only fail to combat them, but also act in the same way: they drink, rob alongside Red Army soldiers, order their orderlies to obtain chickens, geese, clothing, and sometimes even gold and other valuables for them.
    etc
  7. +3
    28 November 2025 11: 45
    Unfortunately, he chose the wrong side: in the Red Army, he could have been of much greater benefit to our country and become an outstanding high-ranking military leader, like Frunze, Budyonny, Yegorov, Voroshilov, and many others.

    "They didn't understand themselves or what had happened"... Alexander Lisovsky, "Konarmiya".
  8. +1
    28 November 2025 17: 06
    Quote: Olgovich
    military representatives of the Entente countries called them "roving armies"


    The author is silent about how the Reds were characterized. lol
    We will help: Poletika:
    bitterness, bragging, thirst for revenge, cruelty, ruthlessness, a penchant for gold and jewelry, for moonshine and reckless drivers, for "Maruskas" and "fat-faced Katkas"... The first days of Bolshevik rule in Kyiv were full of horror and bloodshed.
    and so forth

    Unfortunately, he chose the wrong side: in the Red Army he could have brought much more to our country.there is benefit and become an outstanding high-ranking military leader, like Frunze, Budyonny, Yegorov, Voroshilov
    That's the side he chose, that's the side he stayed alive and wasn't trampled underfoot like Blucher, Tukhachevsky, Yegorov and the FAMILY.

    Regarding "outstanding" lol chiefs who brought "benefits": or "Voroshilov, who did not have a military education, but had an Academy. lol General Staff...HIS name, received a derogatory assessment from his comrades:
    On the work of Comrade Voroshilov: Resolution of the Central Committee of the All-Union Communist Party (Bolsheviks) (1942)

    1. The war with Finland in 1939–1940 revealedand the great inadequacy and backwardness of the leadership of the People's Commissariat of Defense. During this war, the unpreparedness of the People's Commissariat of Defense became apparent. to ensure the successful development of military operationsThe Red Army lacked mortars and machine guns, There was no proper inventory of aircraft and tanks, the troops lacked adequate winter clothing, and they lacked concentrated food supplies. Significant neglect was revealed in the work of such important departments of the People's Commissariat of Defense as the Main Artillery Directorate (GAU), the Combat Training Directorate, the Air Force Directorate, and the poor organization of military educational institutions. All this resulted in the war being prolonged and led to unnecessary casualties.

    Comrade Voroshilov, being at that time the People's Commissar of Defense, was forced to admit at the Plenum of the Central Committee of the All-Union Communist Party (Bolsheviks) at the end of March 1940 that failure of its leadership.

    Taking into account the state of affairs in the People's Commissariat of Defense and seeing that it is difficult for Comrade Voroshilov to cover such large issues as the People's Commissariat of Defense, the Central Committee of the All-Union Communist Party (Bolsheviks) considered it necessary to release Comrade Voroshilov from the post of People's Commissar of Defense.

    2. At the beginning of the war with Germany, Comrade Voroshilov was appointed commander-in-chief of the North-Western direction, which has its main task of defending Leningrad. As it turned out later, Comrade Voroshilov did not cope with the assigned task and was unable to organize the defense of Leningrad. In view of all this, the State Defense Committee recalled Comrade [p.136] Voroshilov from Leningrad and gave him work on new military formations in the rear.

    3. At the request of Comrade Voroshilov, he was sent in February (1942) to the Volkhov Front as a representative of the Headquarters to assist the Front Command and stayed there for about a month. However, Comrade Voroshilov's stay on The Volkhov Front did not produce the desired results
    .

    But he managed to destroy the top of the Red Army - here on horseback.
    It would be better if the Voroshilovs emigrated...

    Regarding their successes in the Civil War, Stalin said:
    "Civil war is NOT a real war"

    You are evil, Olgovich!
  9. +3
    28 November 2025 17: 27
    Quote: faiver
    Let me remind you about Nicholas II, who did not study at any educational institution, and home school teachers did not have the right to question the heir on the material covered

    Honestly, I haven't heard even from Nicholas II's haters that he was poorly educated. They accuse him of everything but that.
    1. +4
      28 November 2025 18: 30
      So no one knows whether he was well or poorly educated, but judging by his actions, his intellect was not very good....
      1. -5
        29 November 2025 12: 38
        Quote: faiver
        So no one knows whether he was well educated or poorly educated.

        Nicholas II spoke Russian fluently, English, French and German.

        The largest and most continuously expanded book collection from the personal libraries of Russian emperors and members of the royal family, which formed part of His Imperial Majesty's Private Libraries, was that of Emperor Nicholas II. It was housed in the halls of the Winter Palace (15,720 books), the Alexander Palace, the Livadia Palace, and on the imperial yacht "Shtandart."

        The library was one of the largest book collections in Russia and was one of the richest in terms of the variety of subjects.The collection contained books from the 14th to the early 20th centuries. In addition to historical, philosophical, spiritual and moral, legal, military, natural science, fiction, and reference sections, it also included materials on the history of the royal family, official documents, and sections on agriculture, industry, and rail transport. The collection also included art albums and ancient Russian handwritten books. The library featured the finest examples of publications from many general and specialized publishing houses, printing houses, and lithographs from both Russia and Europe. Works by famous scholars, writers, and public figures with their autographs, presentation copies, and an extensive collection of magazines from the late 19th and early 20th centuries were also on display. The book collection reflected not only the owner's personal interests but also the political, cultural, and social life of the state.
        1. +3
          29 November 2025 15: 37
          Nicholas II was fluent in Russian, English, French and German.
          - It would have been better if he hadn't learned foreign languages, maybe he would have gotten a normal wife, and the fact that he could read and write, that's an achievement.... Our children these days can read and write quite well by the age of 8-9 bully
          1. -2
            29 November 2025 19: 36
            Quote: faiver
            It would be better if he didn't learn foreign languages

            Do you know at least one?
            Quote: faiver
            You see, I would have taken a normal wife for myself,

            Is this like the lamprey that banned Tarakaishche or the suicide Alleluyeva?

            Alexandra Feodorovna, along with her associates and assistants, transformed the town of Tsarskoye Selo and a large portion of the Winter Palace into the world's largest military medical hospitals and rehabilitation centers, equipped with the most advanced medical equipment. Therefore, the most seriously wounded were brought there, and the Empress herself traveled to the front to pick them up in hospital trains.

            In 1914, under the tutelage of the empress and her daughters, only in Tsarskoye Selo, 85 hospitals were opened in palaces, hospitals, private houses and cottages, starting with the Grand Catherine Palace and ending with cottages and mansions. Alexandra Feodorovna distributed donations for the needs of the war, adapted her palaces in Moscow and Petrograd to hospitals, organized the publication of medical journals, where advanced treatment methods were considered.

            In the palace hospitals, she and her daughters organized courses for sisters of mercy and nurses. In the Winter Palace, the best ceremonial halls overlooking the Neva River, namely, the Nicholas Hall with the Military Gallery, Avan Hall, Field Marshals and the Heraldic Hall, were taken away to the wounded - just a thousand wounded. On her initiative, comfortable additions to the palaces were added to accommodate the wives and mothers of hospitalized soldiers, which had a very positive effect on the healing process of the wounded, and sanitary centers were organized, where women of all classes together prepared dressings for the wounded.

            But she still considered direct assistance to the wounded as nurses to be her and her four daughters' primary responsibility. In November 1914, Alexandra Feodorovna, her daughters Olga and Tatyana, and forty-two other nurses from the first wartime graduating class passed their exams and received their military nurse certificates. Then they all entered the infirmary at the Palace Hospital as ordinary surgical nurses and bandaged the wounded every day, including the seriously wounded.

            Like any operating room nurse, The Empress handed out instruments, cotton wool and bandages, carried away amputated legs and arms, bandaged gangrenous wounds, and learned to quickly change bed linens without disturbing the sick.,
            From a letter from the Empress to Nicholas II. Tsarskoye Selo. November 20, 1914:
            "This morning, while I was helping hand the instruments, Olga threaded needles for a major amputation (an arm was amputated at the shoulder). Then we all worked on bandaging (in our small infirmary), and later, on very complex bandaging in the larger infirmary. I had to bandage the unfortunate ones with terrible wounds..."


            Where are the lampreys/hallelujahs?
            1. +2
              29 November 2025 20: 26
              I had to bandage it
              - here it is, breaking out - she had to......
              1. -1
                30 November 2025 09: 42
                Quote: faiver
                here it is, breaking out - she had to

                and how should it suit you?
                1. -1
                  1 December 2025 12: 27
                  It was like playing "sisters of mercy." They came whenever they wanted—hair done, makeup applied, in elegant dresses. They smiled. Sometimes, depending on their mood, they'd even hand the doctor a bandage. Everyone has known about this for a long time, except for staunch monarchists like Olgovich.
                  1. -1
                    1 December 2025 14: 01
                    Quote: vet
                    It was like playing "sisters of mercy." They came whenever they wanted—hair done, makeup on, in fancy dresses. Smiling.

                    lies from a Russophobe:
                    .:
                    how their immediate superior spoke about these sisters of mercy, Russia's best surgeon Vera Ignatyevna Gedroits, who generally did not like autocracy and initially treated them with caution:
                    “They did not play at being sisters, as I later had to see many times with many social ladies, namely, they were them in the best sense of the word."


                    Tatyana Melnik, daughter of Dr. Botkin: “Dr. Derevenko, a very demanding person in relation to nurses, told me after the revolution, that he had rarely met such a calm, dexterous and efficient surgical nurse as Tatyana Nikolaevna

                    From the diary of his daughter, Olga Nikolaevna:
                    “...I bandaged Potshes, Garmovich of the 64th Kazan Regiment, a wound on the left knee, Ilyin of the 57th Novodzinsky Regiment, a wound on the left shoulder, after Mgebriev, Poboevsky...


                    From the diary of his daughter, Tatyana Nikolaevna:
                    “... There was an operation under local anesthesia for Gramovich, a bullet was removed from his chest. She served tools ... Bandaged Prokosheev of the 14th Finnish Regiment, chest wound, cheek and eye wound. Then I tied up Ivanov, Melik-Adamov, Taube, Malygin ... ”.


                    The Alleluyevs weren't even close...
  10. 0
    28 November 2025 17: 45
    Quote: Olgovich
    The author is silent about how the Reds were characterized.

    Have you considered writing a few articles about Red heroes of the Civil War, such as Rozaliya Zalkind, Kharkiv Chekist Saenko, Agabek, and other accomplished combat and political figures? Reading the comments on VO, one gets the impression that many of these comrades haven't read a single book since their Pioneer youth and still wear rose-colored glasses, believing that Tukhachevsky ordered the Tambov peasants to be sprayed exclusively with French perfume.
    1. +5
      29 November 2025 09: 15
      To write a high-quality, readable, and interesting article for a wide audience, which will be published here, pathological cave-dwelling monarchism alone is somehow not enough.
  11. 0
    29 November 2025 15: 46
    Unfortunately, he chose the wrong side: in the Red Army, he could have brought much more benefit to our country and become an outstanding high-ranking military leader, like Frunze, Budyonny, Yegorov, and Voroshilov.

    Or like Tukhachevsky, Egorov or Blucher.
    By the way, why did you put Voroshilov and Frunze in this row? Kliment Yefremovich and Mikhail Vasilyevich didn't serve in the army at all before the Civil War... perhaps because they weren't caught in the repressions?
    1. +2
      29 November 2025 19: 17
      Mikhail Vasilyevich, before the Civil War, did not serve in the army at all... perhaps because they did not fall under the steamroller of repression?
      He actually died in 1925. What does the steamroller of repression have to do with it?
      1. -2
        30 November 2025 16: 31
        Quote: Ua3qhp
        He actually died in 1925.

        That's why I didn't get in...
        1. 0
          1 December 2025 12: 27
          Are you sure you would have made it? Were you transported to another reality for a couple of hours?
    2. +2
      30 November 2025 00: 58
      Didn't Zhukov, Shaposhnikov, Vasilevsky, and Govorov serve in the army before the revolution? And many, many others, too. Not all of them were "caught in the steamroller of repression."
      1. -1
        30 November 2025 16: 29
        Quote from shikin
        What, Zhukov, Shaposhnikov, Vasilevsky, Govorov didn’t serve in the army before the revolution?

        Are you the author of the article? The question was for him.
  12. +2
    30 November 2025 02: 10
    Quote from Songwolf
    2. I'll express my opinion. It would be nice if we could bring back "swords" to our modern orders...

    Wake up, our Tsar-God, military personnel are awarded the Order "For Merit to the Fatherland" with swords for distinguished service in combat, and the medal of the Order "For Merit to the Fatherland" also has swords for distinguished service in combat.