Russian technology at the 2025 Dubai Airshow

8 920 69
Russian technology at the 2025 Dubai Airshow
A Su-57E fighter with an open internal cargo bay. Photo by UAC.


The Dubai Airshow, aerospace exhibition, recently took place in the United Arab Emirates. As usual, Russian industry represented one of the largest exhibits. State-of-the-art developments across a wide range of categories were on display, including aircraft and helicopter technology, unmanned systems, aircraft components, and more. Some of the exhibits have reportedly already attracted interest from foreign customers.



Russian exposition


The Dubai Airshow, held in the UAE every two years, is one of the largest events of its kind in the Middle East. It consistently attracts the attention of manufacturers. aviation technicians and potential customers, and also helps them find each other.

The Russian aviation industry and related sectors traditionally represented one of the largest exhibits at Dubai Airshow. Various companies, with the support of Rosoboronexport, once again showcased developments across all major categories to potential customers, from full-scale prototypes to individual components.


Forpost-RE UAV. Photo by UZGA

This year, all key areas were once again covered. Russian industry displayed several modern aircraft in the form of real prototypes and mockups, including those of greatest interest to customers. Modern UAVs and airborne weapons were also on display.

It is reported that some of the presented samples have already been exported, and the products are being successfully shipped to customers. Other products have attracted interest from buyers, but so far only preliminary orders have been received. Contracts are expected to be signed later, possibly at a future exhibition.

Aviation equipment


Russian industry presented several modern aircraft of various types in Dubai. Predictably, the exhibition's visitors were most interested in the latest Su-57E fighter jet in its export version. This aircraft recently began its tour of international exhibitions and was shown for the first time in the Middle East.


The Supercam S180 advanced UAV. Photo: European Defence Review

Military personnel from various countries, including those considering purchasing these aircraft, have had the opportunity to get to know them better. Perhaps they will now draw conclusions and make the right decisions. Furthermore, at the Dubai Airshow, the management of the United Aircraft Corporation announced that the first export Su-57s had recently been delivered to the customer.

The Yak-130M combat trainer is being shown to foreign specialists and military personnel for the first time. The basic version of this aircraft is well known abroad, and now a heavily modernized version has made its way to the exhibition. After modifications and improvements, the aircraft retains all pilot training capabilities. At the same time, its weapons-carrying and weapon-use capabilities have been improved—both for training and combat use.

The Ural Works of Civil Aviation has unveiled its advanced UTS-800 trainer aircraft abroad for the first time. It is designed for initial flight training and addresses all the specifics of such work. Furthermore, the use of exclusively Russian-made components and assemblies is cited as a key advantage.


Rocket X-UAV (right) for unmanned aircraft. Photo: European Defence Review

Unmanned direction


Unmanned aerial systems (UAS) consistently attract the attention of potential buyers. Russian industry offers a wide range of developments, both completely new and based on existing products.

An intriguing new development of this kind is the Forpost-RE UAV from UZGA. This is an export version of the existing reconnaissance and strike drone Forpost-R. This time, the discussion was not only about localizing production but also about refining the design and onboard equipment to meet international market requirements. Various payload options were demonstrated alongside the UAV mockup.

The Unmanned Technologies Group unveiled a new UAV in the Supercam series. The S180 is similar to existing UAVs, but has several key differences. While smaller than the production S350, it carries an increased payload of up to 5 kg. Furthermore, its maximum flight speed has been increased.


Engine "177S." Photo by Rostec.

Zala Aero once again showcased the Lancet-E unmanned strike system to potential customers. Models of four different kamikaze drones from the system were brought to the exhibition. This is the first time the infrared-guided version of the UAV has been demonstrated abroad. Also new is the upgraded launcher.

Units and components


The Russian exhibit at Dubai Airshow included a variety of aircraft components, including engines, electronics, and more. Support systems supporting flight operations and combat use were also on display for the first time.

A model of the 177C turbojet engine attracted considerable attention from visitors. This engine is designed for next-generation fighters and boasts improved performance. However, the possibility of retrofitting existing aircraft equipped with other engine types is not ruled out.


SM-100 engine. Photo by UEC

Another interesting new development is the SM-100 turbojet engine. It was developed as a modern, improved replacement for the older AI-225-25, boasting improved technical and operational characteristics. The promising engine is proposed for use in the development of new aircraft or in the modernization of existing ones.

The Radioelectronic Technologies concern presented its new Arbalet-AM airborne radar system for the first time at an international exhibition. This system is designed for installation on various types of aircraft and helicopters. It features a number of important innovations that improve performance and enhance protection against interference.

Russian industry showcased not only aircraft instruments but also support equipment. For example, Ruselectronics unveiled the NKVS-27 ground-based airborne communications system for the first time. It creates a unified information space for data exchange, transmission of orders, and more. This system significantly improves the key performance indicators and combat effectiveness of aircraft.

Aircraft Armament


Rosoboronexport and defense industry companies delivered mockups of a wide range of modern Russian aviation munitions to Dubai. Products of all major classes and various types, including the latest ones, are on display.


Demonstration of the NKVS-27 complex in operation. Graphics by Rostec.

Interestingly, this year Russian air-to-air weapons weren't only on display on the ground. As part of a flight demonstration, the Su-57E fighter demonstrated its internal weapons sling. In its cargo bay, beneath closing doors, were brightly painted Kh-59UShKE missiles.

Several years ago, a new guided air-to-ground missile, the Kh-UAV, was developed for domestic unmanned aircraft. It has already been demonstrated in action, and last year, it made its debut at an exhibition. Now, this product has been showcased abroad. Rosoboronexport's exhibit included the missile itself and its transport and launch container.

The Kh-MD-E air-launched cruise missile is also being demonstrated abroad for the first time. Moreover, the existence of a third modification of this missile was revealed for the first time at Dubai Airshow 2025; previously, only two were mentioned in promotional materials. The different versions of the missile differ from each other in their guidance systems.


Product X-MD-E. Photo by European Defense Review

All missile variants fly to their target using satellite and inertial navigation. The Kh-MD-E1 then begins searching for the target using a semi-active homing head, the E2 uses an active radar and television seeker, and the E3 has an infrared and passive radar seeker.

Modern weapons, including those currently in active use by combat aircraft, were on display in mock-up form. For example, the Kh-69E was on display. Taking into account regional specifics, the mock-up was given a distinctive paint scheme—a gray-green upper surface and a standard gray lower surface with a pixelated transition between them. Like other export missiles, the Kh-69E has a range of 290 km.

Air defense


Traditionally, Russian industry showcases a wide range of air defense systems at exhibitions. This time, products and models of various classes, from man-portable systems to full-scale systems, including the most advanced developments, were delivered to the UAE.

The main exhibit of this type was the Pantsir-SMD-E anti-aircraft missile system. This modular system is suitable for installation on various platforms. The module on display includes the necessary radars and launchers for various missile types. At the exhibition, the SAM system was displayed with a mixed ammunition load.


The Kh-69E missile in a "Middle Eastern" livery. Photo by European Defence Review.

The exhibition also included mockups of full-scale anti-aircraft systems and complexes offered for export. These included the well-known late-model S-300 series, the newer S-400 and S-350, and others. Visitors were once again presented with a comprehensive range of Russian MANPADS, including the latest addition to the line, the Verba. Man-portable systems were displayed both individually and on the Dzhigit launcher.

Commercial results


Russian weapons and military equipment have traditionally enjoyed popularity on the international market. Foreign sanctions in recent years have deterred some potential buyers, but overall, the situation remains acceptable and even encourages optimism. At the same time, the Russian defense industry is doing everything possible to find new customers and secure further contracts.

Thus, at the recent Dubai Airshow 2025, the Su-57 export aircraft was once again shown to foreign specialists and military personnel. Furthermore, the Russian industry reported the delivery of the first batch of such aircraft to a foreign customer. Such news will help new customers make the right decision faster.


The Pantsir-SMD-E module. Photo: Rostec

Domestic UAVs, particularly those used during the Special Operation, are attracting considerable attention. Several new orders for export Lancet drones have been reported. It can be assumed that unnamed customers are interested in new modifications of these drones.

It's safe to assume that Russian companies received other product orders during the recent exhibition. Necessary consultations will take place soon, and new contracts will be awarded as a result. However, it's still unknown what products and in what quantities foreign armies will purchase.

Thus, despite all the current difficulties, the Russian defense industry is introducing various export-grade products to the international market. These products are finding customers, and more such contracts can be expected in the near future.
69 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -3
    26 November 2025 05: 29
    Well, congratulations on the victory of Russian weapons. If only they'd show us electronic warfare systems that can take down Ukraine, then sales would go up. drinks Well, the electronic warfare jamming in my industrial zone sometimes prevents me from opening the trunk with the key fob and so on, and I remember the An-12PP, which could jam landline phones, radios across half of Europe, and even that happened. Now I don't even see the Mi-8PP on my radar, and that used to be the standard military solution during operations. am
    1. +2
      26 November 2025 06: 22
      What is noteworthy, instructive, educational... everything was better before!!! wink We had the best electronic warfare and nothing else!
      Oh yeah, the systems that were supposed to be jammed with electronic warfare are also evolving, becoming much more jam-resistant, and those electronic warfare systems of previous generations are becoming LIKE PIECES TO AN ELEPHANT!!! And new ones, which will effectively interfere with them, must be created, FROM THE BEGINNING...
    2. 0
      26 November 2025 07: 32
      Quote: air wolf
      Well, congratulations on the victory of Russian arms.

      Winning shows or sales?

      Not a word was said about sales volumes or who was the sales leader (winner) at the past exhibition.
      1. +7
        26 November 2025 11: 20
        Winning shows or sales?

        Victory in caps thrown into the sky
      2. +1
        26 November 2025 11: 44
        Boeing signed a contract for the 777X on the very first day for almost 40 billion dollars, and Airbus also has signed agreements for hundreds of aircraft (but these are all passenger and cargo aircraft).
        1. wku
          -1
          26 November 2025 18: 14
          The list price for the 777X is planned to be around 450 million. I found some information on YouTube when I watched the first flight, but the list price is very approximate; all contracts are individual.
  2. +3
    26 November 2025 05: 59
    At the Van Gogh exhibition
    The drone is the main exhibit...
  3. +3
    26 November 2025 08: 06
    The Pantsir-SMD-E module
    Can anyone explain to me why in this model Shell Have they abandoned cannon armament? After all, for low-flying, slow-speed objects like drones, especially those small in size and flying in large numbers, in my opinion, nothing better than a rapid-fire cannon is possible. Thank you...
    1. -1
      26 November 2025 08: 17
      Can anyone explain to me why this model of Pantsir did not have cannon armament?

      as I understand it, small rockets are a "fashionable" trend - and that's the first thing;
      And secondly: do we have "fashionable" shells (with programmable detonation) for guns?
      There are of course samples for exhibitions, but most likely none in stock...
      1. +1
        26 November 2025 08: 37
        Quote: Dedok
        And secondly: do we have "fashionable" shells (with programmable detonation) for guns?
        There are of course samples for exhibitions, but most likely none in stock...

        We don't even have simple canister shot for the ship's 100mm automatic artillery mounts, designed to hit air targets... However, the sailors are afraid to fire them; they're extremely unreliable... In Novorossiysk, the crews should at least be armed with hunting rifles, just in case.
        1. +2
          26 November 2025 11: 11
          Quote: Konnick
          We don't even have simple canister shells for naval 100mm automatic artillery mounts designed to hit air targets.

          Where did the A3-UZS-58 go? belay
          1. 0
            26 November 2025 14: 29
            Quote: Alexey RA
            Quote: Konnick
            We don't even have simple canister shells for naval 100mm automatic artillery mounts designed to hit air targets.

            Where did the A3-UZS-58 go? belay

            I'm talking about standard canister shot, not the anti-aircraft type with detonation. Canister shot is for close-quarters combat, up to half a kilometer away, since at a longer range, the drone is neither visible nor audible.
            1. 0
              26 November 2025 16: 24
              Quote: Konnick
              Buckshot is for close combat up to half a kilometer, since at a longer distance the drone is not visible or heard

              Why such perversions when there is a criminal code?
    2. -1
      26 November 2025 08: 53
      Quote: Luminman
      Can anyone explain to me why this model of Pantsir did not have cannon armament?

      Ah, the answer is very simple: the guns don't hit their targets. wink hi
      1. 0
        26 November 2025 09: 42
        By which one? By UAVs? Is that true?
        1. +3
          26 November 2025 14: 29
          There was a video of a demonstration shooting where he fires two guns at a drone and ends up shooting it down with only an expensive missile.
          1. +1
            26 November 2025 15: 50
            I saw this shooting on Channel 2. And the target wasn't small.
          2. 0
            26 November 2025 18: 45
            Maybe it would have been better to polish it? Not hitting a slow, relatively large UAV with a rapid-fire weapon is a real challenge...
            1. 0
              27 November 2025 10: 16
              Quote: paul3390
              Maybe it would have been better to finish it?

              To modify the Pantsir's cannon section to defeat UAVs, the entire system would have to be dismantled. The distance between the cannon barrels is greater than the drone's wingspan. smile
              Need precision targeting of UAVs? We'll place the machine gun in the center. And at the same time, we'll increase its caliber until the projectile can accommodate a programmable fuse. At the same time, the projectile's power will increase—the GPE cloud will be larger and denser, compensating for any remaining dispersion and targeting errors.
    3. 0
      26 November 2025 09: 01
      Well, it's a module! It's not a complete system (complex) from A to Z! It's a "steak," and the side dish is to taste! And if you add artillery to the module, you'll get something like "this"!
      1. +3
        26 November 2025 19: 10
        Quote: Nikolaevich I
        Well, this is a module! That is, not a system (complex) from A to Z!
        It's a complex indeed! And it's marketed specifically as a surface-to-air missile system (SAM). But it's a modular system, with a number of missile units and radars with varying scanning ranges. All of this can be customized as needed, like a child's construction set. That's why the system is called modular....
        1. -1
          26 November 2025 23: 54
          Quote: Luminman
          anti-aircraft missile system (SAM)

          ZRK - Anti-Aircraft Missile Complex. The term "anti-aircraft missile" doesn't exist. Essentially, and according to the rules of the Russian language, it doesn't exist.
          1. +1
            27 November 2025 08: 05
            Quote: Comet_1
            ZRK - Anti-aircraft Missile Complex. The term "anti-aircraft missile" doesn't exist. Essentially, and according to the rules of the Russian language, it doesn't exist.
            I agree about the rules of the Russian language. But how will a missile shoot down a cheap drone the size of my shoe? Especially on the way to its target?
            1. 0
              14 December 2025 21: 32
              Quote: Luminman
              I agree about the rules of the Russian language. But how will a missile shoot down a cheap drone the size of my shoe? Especially on the way to its target?

              19Я6. 95Я6, 95Я6M will also fit.
    4. +2
      26 November 2025 11: 09
      Quote: Luminman
      After all, for low-flying, low-speed objects like drones, especially those that are small in size and flying in large numbers, in my opinion, nothing better than a rapid-fire cannon can be invented.

      Because two guns spaced several meters apart are ill-suited for targeting small targets—one will always miss (or require fiddling with the aiming controls). Plus, there's the yaw torque from recoil and platform oscillation. Plus, there's vibration during firing, which isn't ideal for the delicate guts of the missiles and the platform's avionics.
      In general, the ZAK needs one gun and projectiles with a programmable detonation time (the radio-controlled fuse may not react to current UAVs). And since Our microchips are the largest in the world. ©, then for starters, you can at least replicate one Italian ZAK from 35 years ago, with a naval gun on an MBT chassis.
      1. +1
        26 November 2025 12: 18
        But it is possible to replicate one fresh Chinese one, with a naval AK-176 on its own wheeled chassis (in our case, in theory, both the Bryansk Voschina and the Minsk ones are suitable).
        1. 0
          26 November 2025 12: 55
          Quote: dr5r
          But you can also replicate one fresh Chinese one, with a naval AK-176 on its own wheeled chassis

          It depends on who the anti-aircraft gun is assigned to. Army air defense prefers tracks—they don't have roads, they have directions. But for air defense forces, a wheeled base is just right.
          The question is, will Almaz-Antey have any available chassis (since BAZ is their own plant, and they're also building a chassis for the Malva)? Or will KAMAZ step up again?
          1. 0
            3 December 2025 08: 16
            The KMK for the AK-176 and the larger KamAZ have a weak base, and the Malva, judging by its appearance, is a "Voshchina" chassis. The 6350 begs for something similar with a 57mm barrel, but I think the only serial production we had was the AK-725. This "Armenian mix" of a "motorized lyga plus an S-60" is non-automated, blind, and deaf.
            1. 0
              3 December 2025 09: 33
              I didn't have time to write, the time for commenting was gone. 725 is too heavy, without backing, it seems more than a dozen tons, and you also need SON - you definitely can't hang a nine on such a cart, even on new element base.
            2. 0
              3 December 2025 17: 10
              Quote: dr5r
              and "Malva", judging by its appearance, is "Voshchina" in the chassis part.

              That's what I meant - the Almazovsky BAZ, in addition to its own "A-A" needs (transplanting the DD air defense missile system onto a domestic chassis), also works for artillerymen.
              Quote: dr5r
              The 6350 needs something similar based on a 57 mm barrel, but I think the only serial ones we had were the AK-725.

              There's also the Burevestniks' creation, the AU-220M. They began designing the basic 57mm AU back in the 70s to replace the AK-725, but since then they've been unable to fit it into either the Navy or the FSB, so they switched to a land-based version.
              Plus there is a 57mm module from "Derivation-PVO" with 2A90 from the same "Burevestniks".
      2. 0
        26 November 2025 19: 16
        Alexey RA, I agree with you only on the rocket Shell effective only for purposes such as HIMARS, ATACMS, Storm ShadowAnd, of course, against aircraft. But against targets that have managed to break through the outer defense line and are already approaching, a missile, in my opinion, is like a poultice for an elephant. This is already a tasty target for a cannon....
        1. 0
          26 November 2025 23: 51
          Quote: Luminman
          But against targets that have managed to penetrate the rearmost line of defense and are already approaching, a missile, in my opinion, is like a poultice for an elephant. That's a tasty morsel for a cannon...

          The missile, while approaching, climbs and dives toward its target. Cannons are a disaster against such a maneuvering missile, unless the missile's target is the Pantsir itself.
          1. +1
            27 November 2025 08: 03
            Quote: Comet_1
            The missile, while approaching, climbs and dives towards its target.
            Not every missile can do this. Besides, a missile requires high G-forces to perform an anti-aircraft maneuver, and an anti-aircraft missile requires even greater G-forces, and that's impossible...
            1. 0
              14 December 2025 21: 30
              Quote: Luminman
              Not every rocket can do this.

              Each one.
              Quote: Luminman
              Moreover, an anti-aircraft maneuver requires high G-forces for a missile, and an anti-aircraft missile requires even greater G-forces, and this is impossible...

              This is in some other reality.
      3. 0
        26 November 2025 23: 44
        Quote: Alexey RA
        In general, the ZAK requires one cannon and projectiles with a programmable detonation time (the radio-controlled fuse may not react to current UAVs).

        Well, projectiles with programmable detonation times will reduce the projectile consumption by 2.61 times compared to conventional ones. Is that critical? Are we short of conventional projectiles?
    5. +2
      26 November 2025 20: 19
      Quote: Luminman
      Can anyone explain to me why this model of Pantsir did not have cannon armament?
      Because it can't hit drones, and shooting down low-flying aircraft when the missiles are already exhausted is now of little use. The problem is that the original plan was to intercept aircraft with cannons by creating a cone of destruction—an area so dense with projectiles that an aircraft entering it would inevitably be hit. To achieve this, they set a very high rate of fire and neglected accuracy. A drone is much smaller than an aircraft and usually flies through this cone without harm. Shooting down aircraft using precision requires installing different cannons, implementing a remote detonation system, and switching from wheels to tracks, as a wheeled platform wobbles considerably when fired from cannons.
      1. 0
        26 November 2025 23: 46
        Quote: bk0010
        We need to install other guns and implement remote detonation of the projectile

        Remote detonation of a projectile reduces ammunition consumption by 2.61 times. Is this reduction critical for us? Are we short of conventional ammunition?
        1. +1
          27 November 2025 10: 24
          Quote: Comet_1
          Remote detonation of a projectile reduces ammunition consumption by 2.61 times. Is this reduction critical for us? Are we short of conventional ammunition?

          We are short of portable ammunition. smile
          For us, a programmable fuse is about 57mm. That's 120-150 rounds per ammo pack. If the system needs to reload 2,5 times less often, that's significant for air defense.
          1. 0
            27 November 2025 11: 43
            Quote: Alexey RA
            For us, a programmable time fuse is somewhere around 57 mm.
            A programmable fuse is a no-no, it's expensive. If we have radar, we'll install a proximity fuse. The 57mm is the worst option: it's neither a small-caliber gun with a high rate of fire and a ton of shells, nor is it a medium-caliber gun, which offers a significantly larger blast radius. We need something in the 76-85mm caliber. Like what happened in De Moines back in 1945.
            1. 0
              27 November 2025 16: 07
              Quote: bk0010
              There is a radar - we install a radio fuse.

              Will the reflected signal from the UAV be enough to trigger the fuse at the optimal detonation distance?
              Quote: bk0010
              The 57mm is the worst option: it is neither a small-caliber gun with a high rate of fire and a burst of shells, nor a medium-caliber gun, which provides a significantly larger radius of destruction due to the shock wave.

              However, the weight and dimensions of the chassis do not inflate to the size of the MAZ-543. smile
              Quote: bk0010
              We need to do something in the 76-85 mm caliber.

              "Automatic." Which fits either on the MBT chassis (for the military) or on the "Voshchina" (for the Aerospace Forces).
              1. 0
                27 November 2025 17: 05
                Quote: Alexey RA
                Will the reflected signal from the UAV be enough to trigger the fuse at the optimal detonation distance?
                The UAV is close, and the reflected signal strength is proportional to the fourth power of the distance. I think that's enough.
                Quote: Alexey RA
                However, the weight and dimensions of the chassis do not inflate to the size of the MAZ-543.
                That's true, but the area covered can increase significantly (due to the range) and more power can be supplied to the radar from such a platform.
              2. 0
                3 December 2025 09: 34
                on the MBT chassis

                and what about us? Maybe it's better at -55? Or, with the advantage of service, it's really better at -72+? But it seems like 726 is already climbing on it, and the Turret is on surrender the battery.
                1. +1
                  3 December 2025 17: 04
                  Quote: dr5r
                  What about us? Maybe -55 would be better?

                  They'll definitely give you a reward for the 55th chassis. Supply and repair crews. They'll catch up and give you another one. smile
                  Quote: dr5r
                  Or is it really better to have -72+ due to the service advantage?

                  Chassis unification. Plus, cross-country ability—the army will definitely be driving this air defense system alongside armored vehicles. directions.
                  1. 0
                    5 December 2025 12: 14
                    They'll definitely give you a price for the 55th chassis. Suppliers and repairmen

                    So, in the absence of a maid, the servants are called to the bathhouse. There are plenty of them, in the form of ersatz self-propelled guns.
          2. -1
            14 December 2025 21: 41
            Quote: Alexey RA
            We are short of portable ammunition.

            Isn't there enough ammo? The Pantsir-S has 1400 rounds per ammo pack. Is that missing for something?
            Quote: Alexey RA
            For us, a programmable fuse is about 57mm. That's 120-150 rounds per ammo pack.

            Why do we need 57mm? We don't have a large number of 57mm anti-aircraft guns that could fire remotely detonated shells.
      2. -1
        17 January 2026 00: 05
        Regarding the wheelbase, do you even know anything about outriggers? Or are you just hanging out on a bench with your old ladies? Don't talk nonsense. The tracks have the same problems. It's just that even old ladies find it funny to discuss this, and ground-based complexes just don't understand it.
    6. -2
      26 November 2025 23: 41
      Quote: Luminman
      Can anyone explain to me why this model of Pantsir did not have cannon armament?

      Because the Pantsir-SMD is designed for installation on building roofs and truss towers, among other things. These structures aren't rigid enough to absorb the recoil of cannon fire. Furthermore, the weight of the roof- and tower-mounted module had to be reduced. The cannons and ammunition weigh around 1700 kg. The cannons and control module were removed, and a lighter SOC system was installed. The cannons were removed, but missiles weren't installed in their place. It was important to lighten the module.
      1. +1
        27 November 2025 07: 58
        Quote: Comet_1
        The guns were removed, but missiles were not installed in their place.
        It's the exact opposite. The space where the guns used to be has been replaced with additional missile pods...
        1. 0
          14 December 2025 21: 28
          Quote: Luminman
          It's the exact opposite. The space where the guns used to be has been replaced with additional missile pods...

          The SMD doesn't have any additional missile pods. It's just the same 12 95Ya6 SAMs. A container with four 19Ya6 SAMs can be installed in place of one 95Ya6 SAM. Only the Arctic variant has additional missile pods.
          1. +1
            15 December 2025 07: 51
            Quote: Comet_1
            There are no additional missile blocks on the SMD.
            The exhibition discussed replacing rifled artillery units with missile units. You probably know more... wink
            1. 0
              12 January 2026 21: 59
              Quote: Luminman
              The exhibition discussed replacing rifled artillery units with missile units. You probably know more...

              I probably know more. I've seen them all in person. Just as there were 12 "seats" on the Pantsir air defense missile and gun system, there are still 12 "seats" on the Pantsir-SMD air defense system. The Arctic variant has 18.
    7. 0
      27 November 2025 10: 01
      As far as I understand, they haven't abandoned the standard Pantsir, but with modular systems, the presence of a gun introduces additional recoil, which needs to be compensated for. And the anti-aircraft missile launcher is now being positioned as a modular solution, among other things—mount it wherever you like.
  4. +1
    26 November 2025 08: 20
    Not on topic news, but:
    The latest information on aircraft lost in Taganrog. The attack on the aircraft factory destroyed not one, but two flying laboratory aircraft. One was an A-60 based on the Il-76MD, and the A-100LL experimental AWACS aircraft, a conversion of an A-50 with advanced systems.
    The A-60 hasn't flown for over a decade, sitting idle. The A-100 project is closed, and development has long since ceased: "People have already worked more effectively on it, even without missiles and drones."
    1. +2
      26 November 2025 08: 45
      Latest information on aircraft lost in Taganrog.

      Alas, alas ...
    2. -4
      26 November 2025 12: 50
      That's why this trash wasn't removed or saved from drones.
      1. 0
        27 November 2025 10: 03
        It was a subtle calculation. But it would have been better to cast the models out of concrete.
        1. +1
          27 November 2025 12: 04
          They knew about it, it was no secret that these were hulls for cutting
          1. 0
            27 November 2025 14: 27
            i.e. 404th caused damage to the warrant officer (general) who was supposed to hand over the color metal and precious metals from the electronics...?
            1. +1
              28 November 2025 11: 47
              Well, it wouldn't be the ensign who would hand it over, but the office
  5. 0
    26 November 2025 08: 28
    This time, it is not only about localizing production, but also about refining the design and on-board equipment taking into account the requirements of the international market
    .

    Well, what can you say here, except words that can't be used on the forum...
    1. +2
      26 November 2025 10: 26
      Well, what can you say here, except words that can't be used on the forum...

      I'm interested in something a little different: long-range/strategic aviation aircraft were moved as far away from the LBS as possible, so why can flying laboratories be located "right" on the LBS?
      Who gave the command?
      When will they be held accountable for carelessness like they are for terrorism?
      1. -1
        26 November 2025 10: 48
        Quote: Dedok
        Who gave the command?
        When will they be held accountable for carelessness like they are for terrorism?

        The problem is in the personnel...the people in power, both civil and military, are very narrow-minded.
        1. +3
          26 November 2025 10: 53
          Are they short-sighted? I think they're very wise... cunning people, and today they're celebrating with champagne—they'll write off so much stuff to cover these losses that you'll wonder how it all physically fit on the plane.
      2. +1
        26 November 2025 11: 00
        Quote: Dedok
        Why can flying laboratories be located "directly" on the LBS?

        Because they've been defunct laboratories for a long time. You yourself wrote that both projects were closed.
      3. 0
        27 November 2025 10: 05
        Perhaps these vehicles are listed as new and equipped with new expensive equipment.
        They'll put the janitor in jail.
  6. +7
    26 November 2025 10: 56
    A curious new development of this type is the Forpost-RE UAV from UZGA. It is an export version of the existing Forpost-R reconnaissance and attack drone.

    Um... do they seriously want to sell abroad the export version of the Israeli IAI Searcher II, which is more than a quarter of a century old?
    1. +2
      27 November 2025 10: 07
      Why not? It's local; there's nothing there from the original, nothing from the last century either. "Our" Searcher couldn't bomb it, but now Forpost is bombing. Does the glider layout bother you?
      And by the way, Russia isn't the only one to have acquired a license for this successful UAV. The US, Türkiye, and a few others...
      1. 0
        27 November 2025 10: 31
        Quote: Zaurbek
        Why not? It's local; there's nothing there from the original, nothing from the last century either. "Our" Searcher couldn't bomb it, but now Forpost is bombing. Does the glider layout bother you?

        One thing confuses me - who will buy an export version of a Mark II copy if there is an original Mark III? what
        1. +2
          27 November 2025 11: 17
          I'll tell you - those who want it and to whom Israel doesn't sell it, or if Israel is cheaper, or who want a license for assembly (so that the components are always sold) or so that the attack version is sold (the same Israel only supplied Georgia and India with a reconnaissance version).