"I command the fleet. Schmidt."

7 802 46
"I command the fleet. Schmidt."
Uprising on the Cruiser Ochakov. Artist: L. E. Muchnik.


Troubles


Armed uprisings on navy were associated with the general crisis of the Romanov empire, which was developing into turmoil, that is, into a catastrophe leading to the radical collapse of the entire previous system.



The Romanov project, which divided the Russian Empire into two worlds—a European "metropolis," educated and well-off, and a peasant labor "colony," exploited in the most brutal manner—was running its course. For a time, this brutal contradiction was mitigated, including by drowning peasant wars and uprisings in blood.

But by the beginning of the 20th century, the empire had reached a "transition point." The problem of the "boiling cauldron" needed to be resolved. Almost all the last Russian emperors understood this, but they never decided on a radical change, a "revolution from above."

The Russian Empire was piling up a mountain of problems and issues. Peasants wanted land, and the center of the country was overpopulated by agrarians. Workers and non-Russians were dissatisfied. The country needed accelerated industrialization and urbanization. It was essential to eliminate cultural and economic dependence on Western Europe. Illiteracy had to be eradicated and a strong education system had to be created, including technical education (half of the country's engineers were Germans, foreigners).

Destroy the parasitic, destructive caste-class system, whereby nobles, bourgeois, and capitalists "earned" their money in Russia and transferred it to Europe, where they lived. In general, transition from predatory capitalism to socialism.

However, the government of Nicholas II was unable to resolve these and a number of other issues. They were left to the Bolsheviks to resolve.

The 1905 Revolution served as a kind of final wake-up call for the tsarist government. By the beginning of the 20th century, capitalism in Russia, as elsewhere in the world, was experiencing yet another crisis. As a result, all the social, economic, and political contradictions of the bourgeois system reached their extreme aggravation.

The agrarian and industrial crisis that gripped the country, the resounding defeats during the Russo-Japanese War, caused by St. Petersburg's mistakes in the Far East and the provocative, hostile policies of our Western "partners," as well as the intensification of subversive activities by foreign agents (including Japanese intelligence) and revolutionary forces supported abroad, led to a revolutionary explosion. The Time of Troubles began (The approach of the Russian Time of Troubles; Anticipation of the apocalypse).


Black Sea Fleet Commander Vice-Admiral Grigory Pavlovich Chukhnin (1848–1906). Killed by revolutionaries.

Central


The sailors, among whom there were strong socialist and anarchist sentiments, also took a very active part in the revolution. While the soldiers, mostly former peasants, were traditionally passive, maintaining their faith in the "good tsar," the situation with the sailors was different.

Many of the sailors were blue-collar workers. The navy became armored and steam-powered, and the ships had complex internal components. Therefore, more literate people were recruited to serve the ships. Young workers had some education and were well-read. Consequently, revolutionary propaganda had an influence on them. Underground revolutionary cells formed in the navy.

The general situation in the navy is well described in the novel "Tsushima" by Alexei Novikov-Priboy, a Baltic Fleet sailor who participated in the 2nd Pacific Fleet's campaign and the Battle of Tsushima. A difficult and lengthy seven-year service, corruption and arbitrary rule by superiors, harsh drill and physical abuse. The best traditions of Ushakov, Lazarev, and Nazimov in educating officers and sailors were firmly forgotten.

The arbitrary nature of the regime and its repression provoked protests and resentment toward the officers among the sailors. It's no surprise that during the 1917 Revolution, the navy witnessed the most brutal and bloody excesses, including the extermination of officers.

And revolutionary propaganda found grateful converts. As early as 1901-1902, the first Social Democratic circles and cells emerged in the navy. The revolutionary movement in the navy quickly acquired an organized character.

In April 1904, the Central Fleet Committee (Tsentralka) was created as a result of the merger of the 37th Naval Crew in Nikolaev, the 32nd Crew in Sevastopol, and several other teams with the party organization of the training detachment. It became the military organization of the Sevastopol Committee of the RSDLP. Tsentralka maintained ties with revolutionary organizations in several cities. The Central Committee quickly spread its influence among the sailors.


Baron Alexander Nikolaevich Meller-Zakomelsky (1844–1928), in 1905 led the suppression of uprisings in Sevastopol and in Siberia, on the Trans-Siberian Railway

Revolutionary situation


Meanwhile, controlled chaos in the country was growing. Hundreds of thousands of workers participated in strikes and walkouts. A terrible peasant war broke out across the country, with estates ablaze. The situation was grave in the national borderlands—Finland, Poland, the Caucasus, and elsewhere. The criminal underworld became active. Revolutionary unrest was also occurring within the imperial armed forces, particularly in the navy and after the Tsushima disaster.

Guided by the decisions of the Third Party Congress, the Central Committee began preparing for an armed uprising in the Black Sea Fleet. The revolutionaries believed they could seize the fleet's main ships and seize power in Sevastopol. Sevastopol would then become the center of an uprising throughout Southern Russia. The uprising was planned for the end of the naval summer maneuvers, in August-September 1905, when the revolutionary movement in the country was expected to reach its peak.

This plan was thwarted by the spontaneous entry in June of the squadron battleship Prince Potemkin-Tavrichesky (Uprising on the battleship "Potemkin"). This rebellion led to increased repression and police activity, which thwarted the revolutionaries' plans to launch a major uprising.

In the second half of 1905, the turmoil in Russia continued to mount. An all-Russian political strike in October involved more than 2 million workers. Soviets of Workers' Deputies were formed in many cities. Tsar Nicholas II, under the influence of the head of government, Witte, made concessions. On October 17, a Manifesto was issued, promising the country parliamentary elections (the Duma), political rights, and freedoms.The October Manifesto and its significance).

Sevastopol was also unsettled in October. Rallies and demonstrations by workers, soldiers, and sailors were held, demanding the release of political prisoners. Martial law was declared in the city. At the end of October, a general strike of workers, railway workers, and merchant sailors began.


The crew of the cruiser Ochakov two weeks before the 1905 uprising and Lieutenant Schmidt (upper right corner)

Insurrection


On November 8 (21), 1905, unrest broke out on the cruiser Ochakov and the battleship Saint Panteleimon. On November 10 (23), after the farewell ceremony for the demobilized sailors, a large rally was held. The military organization of the Sevastopol Committee of the RSDLP attempted to prevent a spontaneous explosion, but failed. On November 11 (24), a spontaneous mutiny broke out in the naval division.

On November 11 (24), elections to the Council of Workers, Sailors, and Soldiers' Deputies were scheduled to take place. To prevent them, Black Sea Fleet Commander Grigory Chukhnin sent a combined detachment of sailors and soldiers from the Belostok Regiment to the barracks. They blocked the exits.

In a rapidly escalating situation, sailor Petrov fired at the commander of the free detachment, Pisarevsky, and mortally wounded the commander of the training team, Stein. Petrov was captured, but the mutinous sailors freed him. The duty officers were then disarmed and arrested, after which they were expelled from the barracks. The mutiny quickly spread, and the sailors of the naval division were joined by soldiers from the garrison and other naval units.

As a result, an uprising begins, which Lenin figuratively called Sevastopol fireOn November 12, a general strike engulfed the city. The Sevastopol Council of Sailors, Soldiers, and Workers' Deputies was elected. Political demands were put forward, including the convening of a Constituent Assembly. The naval command began to assemble loyal forces.

The mutiny escalates. On November 13 (26), the crew of the cruiser Ochakov mutinied. The officers were forced to flee the ship. The rebellion was led by Bolsheviks Chastnik, Antonenko, and Gladkov. General command of the mutinous forces on November 14 (27) was taken over by a popular revolutionary in the city, Lieutenant Pyotr Schmidt, who had previously been dismissed from the navy for desertion and embezzlement (he had squandered the ship's treasury). He declared himself commander of the Black Sea Fleet, giving the signal:

I command the fleet. Schmidt.

On the same day he sent a telegram to Tsar Nicholas II:

The glorious Black Sea Fleet, sacredly loyal to its people, demands that you, sir, immediately convene the Constituent Assembly and no longer obey your ministers. Fleet Commander P. Schmidt.

On the night of November 15 (28), revolutionaries seized several ships and vessels, and some crews joined them. Red flags were raised on the mutinous ships. The mutineers hoped that the remaining ships of the fleet would join them. But the command managed to take countermeasures: suspicious sailors were either discharged or arrested.

To win the entire squadron over to the rebels, "fleet commander" Schmidt circled around it on the destroyer Svirepy, but without much success. Command was already in control of the situation. Only the battleship Panteleimon (formerly Potemkin) joined the mutiny, but the ship itself was no longer a combat unit, having been stripped of its armament.

The rebel forces consisted of 14 ships and vessels, and approximately 4,5 sailors and soldiers on board and ashore. However, the combat potential of the revolutionary fleet and garrison was weak. Most of the naval guns had been disabled by officers and conductors (naval non-commissioned officers). The soldiers were poorly armed and lacked experienced leaders, as career officers and non-commissioned officers had not succumbed to revolutionary propaganda. The rebels also hesitated too long, losing time and initiative.

And among the high command, unlike in 1917, there were still decisive and proactive commanders ready to fight for the throne. General Alexander Kaulbars, commander of the Odessa Military District, Vice-Admiral Grigory Chukhnin, commander of the Black Sea Fleet, and General Alexander Meller-Zakomelsky, commander of the 7th Army Corps, amassed up to 10 soldiers and controlled 22 ships with a crew of 6.

On the afternoon of November 15 (28), the rebels were given an ultimatum to surrender. Receiving no response, troops loyal to the government launched an offensive and opened fire on "internal enemies."

The rebel resistance was crushed fairly quickly and decisively. In particular, the Ochakov was literally shelled. The cruiser sustained heavy damage: during repairs, 63 holes were counted in the hull, and repairs lasted over three years. The shelling of the revolutionary ships continued until 16:45 PM. Many ships were engulfed in flames, and the sailors escaped as best they could. Hundreds were killed and wounded. Schmidt was captured. On the morning of the 16th, the rebels, who had been hiding in the barracks, surrendered.

Overall, given the scale of the mutiny and the danger it posed to the nation, which included the potential for a significant portion of the Black Sea Fleet to revolt, supported by some ground forces, and then a revolt in major cities across southern Russia, the punishment was quite humane. The leaders of the Sevastopol uprising—Schmidt, Chastnik, Antonenko, and Gladkov—were executed by firing squad on Berezan Island by a naval court in March 1906. Over 300 others were sentenced to varying terms of imprisonment and hard labor. About a thousand others were subjected to disciplinary punishments without any trial.


A Soviet stamp from 1972. The crew of the cruiser Ochakov was the most revolutionary in the navy. After the events, the ship was renamed Kagul.
46 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 14+
    24 November 2025 07: 33
    Lieutenant Schmidt's enthusiasm is impressive - he immediately declared himself commander of the fleet and immediately began telegraphing the Tsar with impudent demands.
    This glorious revolutionary, although apparently not entirely in his right mind, later found a "worthy" student and follower - Sablin, who also telegraphed Brezhnev and threatened to dissolve the Politburo.
    1. 10+
      24 November 2025 08: 11
      Quote: bober1982
      Lieutenant Schmidt's enthusiasm is impressive - he immediately declared himself commander of the fleet and immediately began telegraphing the Tsar with impudent demands.
      This glorious revolutionary, although apparently not entirely in his right mind, later found a "worthy" student and follower - Sablin, who also telegraphed Brezhnev and threatened to dissolve the Politburo.

      What's typical is that he "spent the squad's cash."
      1. -14
        24 November 2025 08: 31
        What "cash desk"? What troop? Pioneers? Or Boy Scouts?
        1. 10+
          24 November 2025 08: 53
          Quote: Grencer81
          What "cash desk"? What squad?

          Schmidt stole the cash register of a detachment of two destroyers, which he commanded in Izmail, escaped, and subsequently spent all the money on the run in Kyiv.
          Schmidt got out of this whole story with the help of his uncle, the admiral.
          The revolutionary himself not only declared himself commander of the fleet, but also at a rally (this was his element) announced the separation of Crimea from Russia, the landing of troops in Odessa, Kherson and the creation of a southern Russian socialist republic, which he would lead.
          Revolutionary sailors raised the red flag to the accompaniment of the anthem God Save the Tsar.
          1. -10
            24 November 2025 08: 57
            Well, well, well... He's not the Grand Duke of the Romanov family. They were the ones who were allowed to quietly steal money from the cash register to buy diamonds for ballerinas and singers...
            1. 13+
              24 November 2025 09: 00
              Quote: Grencer81
              He is not the Grand Duke of the Romanov family.

              He is from a hereditary nobility, his mother is a baroness, all his relatives are admirals, his service in the navy was nothing but rare antics, with breaks for treatment in mental hospitals.
              1. +7
                24 November 2025 13: 38
                About which, as well as about the theft of state funds, a fairy tale was invented after his execution... Nothing new under the sun... By the way, the senior officer of the transport "Irtysh" Lieutenant Schmidt was written off for a reason, but because in front of the sailors he punched the drunken commander of the transport Captain-2 Ergomyshev in the face.
                1. +2
                  24 November 2025 15: 02
                  Quote: Grencer81
                  By the way, the senior officer of the transport "Irtysh", Lieutenant Schmidt, was written off not just like that, but because he punched someone in the face in front of the sailors.

                  In just five years, Schmidt changed a large number of all kinds of ships - a destroyer, a cruiser, a tug, a schooner, gunboats, an icebreaker, including the coal transport Irtysh.
                  And there were fights everywhere, he even caused a scandal in Nagasaki, which almost caused an international scandal, he promised to kill the Japanese consul.
                  In between his service on numerous ships, he underwent treatment in psychiatric hospitals.
                  1. +2
                    24 November 2025 19: 44
                    Which "hospitals" exactly? Please provide the full list...
                    The Japanese consul in Nagasaki? Water is water, and oil is oil?
                    If one wishes, one can paint a record of service that will make even the devils of hell refuse to accept one.
                    Even then, nobody cancelled propaganda.
                2. +4
                  24 November 2025 21: 26
                  Quote: Grencer81
                  Incidentally, the senior officer of the transport "Irtysh", Lieutenant Schmidt, was discharged not just like that, but because he punched the drunken commander of the transport, Captain-2 Ergomyshev, in front of the sailors.

                  Firstly, not to the commander, but to the senior officer.
                  Secondly, not to Ergamyshev, but to Muravyov.
                  Thirdly, not in front of the sailors, but in front of the ladies at the ball.
                  At the very height of the ball, during a lull in the quadrille, Lieutenant Muravyov, the senior officer of the Anadyr transport, was sitting and chatting with a blue-eyed, blonde beauty, Baroness Krüdener, a beautiful woman. Meanwhile, Lieutenant Schmidt, an officer of the Irtysh transport, who was at the other end of the room, slowly crossed the room, approached Lieutenant Muravyov, and, without a word, slapped him. Baroness Krüdener screamed and fainted. Several people seated nearby rushed to her, and the lieutenants grappled in a deadly struggle, striking each other, and fell to the floor, still fighting. Papers, confetti, and cigarette butts flew from under them, like from squabbling dogs. It was a disgusting sight. Captain Zenov of the 178th Wenden Infantry Regiment was the first to rush toward the combatants; other officers followed his example, forcibly pulling the fighters apart. They were immediately arrested and sent to the Port. When they were led out into the hallway, whose large crystal-glass windows looked out onto Kurgauzsky Prospekt, where hundreds of cabbies were lined up, Lieutenant Schmidt grabbed a heavy yellow chair and hurled it at the glass.

                  After this, the ball ended, as most of the mothers, fearing a repeat of such antics, began hastily taking their daughters away. The scandal was enormous: the naval officer's uniform had been disgraced before the entire Libau society, before the footmen, before the cabbies! Who among the townspeople could have known that in Schmidt and Muravyov they saw not naval officers, but the sad dregs of our navy?

                  I was well aware of this case because, in accordance with Article 317 of the Military Court Regulations, the investigation was conducted not by naval officers, as the naval authorities insisted, but by officers of the Commandant's Department of the headquarters assigned to me. When the investigation was fully completed, it was forwarded to the Port Commander.

                  As far as I recall, these gentlemen were arrested before the squadron's departure from Libau, to prevent them from escaping their ships. This time, the Naval General Staff again issued a decision highly undesirable for these degenerates: they were ordered to be taken on the campaign and, at the end of the war, to be discharged as unfit.

                  I don't know what happened to Muravyov later, but Schmidt reached Kamran Bay, but there, by order of Admiral Rozhdestvensky, he was "written off" for some further shameful behavior and sent back to Russia. In 1905, in Sevastopol, this degenerate, coward, and deserter organized a sailors' rebellion and rose to lead the mutineers. After the uprising was suppressed, he attempted to escape but was caught while disembarking from a fishing boat by an officer of the Sevastopol Fortress Commandant's Office and arrested. He was then tried and, despite all the efforts of socialists and his defense at trial by attorney A.S. Zarudny, he was sentenced to death and, along with three of his employees—conductor Shchasny and two sailors—was executed on Berezan Island.

                  http://rufort.info/library/rerberg/index.html
                  1. +2
                    24 November 2025 21: 38
                    In this work, written in Alexandria, Egypt, in 1925, Mr. Rerberg F.P. describes only himself as “white and fluffy.”
                  2. +3
                    25 November 2025 03: 23
                    However, the list of officers of the transport "Anadyr" does not contain any lieutenants named Muravyov. The senior officer of the transport "Anadyr" was Lieutenant, from 15.04.1905 Captain of the 2nd rank, A.A. Ivanov-9.
                    So, whatever your Mr. Rerberg F.P. has come up with, let him keep it.
                    1. +1
                      25 November 2025 09: 58
                      Quote: Grencer81
                      The senior officer of the transport "Anadyr" was Lieutenant, from 15.04.1905 Captain 2nd rank, Ivanov-9th A.A.

                      Rerberg could have messed things up, of course, but during the last cruise, five senior officers came and went on the Irtysh. And since there were no decent officers left, all sorts of crap was constantly happening to them.
                      Well, if it comes to that, you can find out the source of this information:
                      Quote: Grencer81
                      Incidentally, the senior officer of the transport "Irtysh", Lieutenant Schmidt, was discharged not just like that, but because he punched the drunken commander of the transport, Captain-2 Ergomyshev, in front of the sailors.

                      It's your choice, but something's not right here.
                      1. +1
                        25 November 2025 10: 46
                        As far as I remember, this is in G.K. Graf's memoirs. However, Warrant Officer Graf writes that both the commander and the senior officer were on first-name terms with Bacchus.
                      2. +1
                        25 November 2025 12: 07
                        Quote: Grencer81
                        As far as I remember, this is in G.K. Graf’s memoirs.

                        You remember incorrectly. The Count literally wrote the following:
                        Before leaving Libau, we had an unpleasant encounter. Lieutenant Schmidt, the senior officer of the Irtysh, and Chief Engineer P. went ashore and found themselves at a dance in the Kurhaus. There, Schmidt saw Lieutenant Dmitriev, who had been the cause of his family drama in their youth. He hadn't seen D. since, but he hadn't forgotten his promise to "settle the score" the next time they met. On that fateful evening, many years later, that meeting took place, and when the dancing was over and almost everyone had left, Schmidt approached D. and, without further ado, slapped him across the face.

                        There was general confusion, and the friends immediately took Schmidt and Dmitriev away, but the scandal became public, and they both had to report everything to their superiors. Our commander, who already disliked Schmidt, was extremely displeased by the incident and immediately reported it to Admiral Rozhestvensky's headquarters. From there, an order followed: "No duels are to be allowed during the war, and Lieutenant Schmidt is to be kept in his cabin for ten days with a guard posted."

                        Moreover, from his words it is obvious that Harold Karovich was not a witness to the event itself.
                        You see, the thing is: insulting your immediate superior during wartime is a surefire court-martial.
                        Schmidt simply didn't want to go to war. He wasn't afraid of losing his reputation due to scandal; after his scandalous marriage to a woman with limited social responsibility, his reputation was already at rock bottom.
                        As for the picture... what does "Anadyr" have to do with it?
                      3. 0
                        25 November 2025 13: 24
                        Someone above wrote about a fight between Schmidt and a certain Muravyov, a lieutenant, a senior officer from the Anadyr... Wasn't that your highness?
                      4. +1
                        25 November 2025 14: 59
                        No, Rerberg wrote this)))
                        Apparently, over the years, he confused the last name of one of the participants and the position in which he served.
                        That is, no senior officer, senior navigator Officer Dmitriev.
                        However, the main thing is not this, but that the melodramatic story about how Schmidt punched the commander in the face in front of the sailors has no confirmation. request
                      5. 0
                        26 November 2025 08: 11
                        Senior artillery officer of the battleship "Admiral Ushakov," Lieutenant N.N. Dmitriev 3rd. There was such an officer in the 3rd squadron. But... Was there a fight or even an incident?
                      6. 0
                        26 November 2025 08: 20
                        Quote: Grencer81
                        Senior artillery officer of the battleship "Admiral Ushakov" Lieutenant N.N. Dmitriev 3rd.

                        Look at your picture. Senior navigation officer, Lieutenant I.N. Dmitriev-4th.
                        Quote: Grencer81
                        Was there a fight or any incident at all?

                        Remind me, whose "lordship" started the conversation about the beating committed by Schmidt?)))
                        True, it turned out that it happened in the wrong place and with the wrong person, but... request
                      7. 0
                        26 November 2025 00: 18
                        Schmidt saw Lieutenant Dmitriev there, the cause of his family drama in their youth. He hadn't seen D. since, but he hadn't forgotten his promise to "settle the score" at their first meeting.

                        The conclusion "Schmidt simply didn't want to go to war" doesn't quite fit with the quoted statement. And given Graf's biography, it's doubtful he could have written anything positive about the "traitor" Schmidt...
                      8. 0
                        26 November 2025 08: 11
                        Quote: Lynnot
                        The conclusion "Schmidt simply didn't want to go to war" doesn't quite fit with what was quoted.

                        As I already wrote, Graf was not a witness to this incident. Therefore, he described the version of events as told to him by Schmidt, whom he had a good relationship with.
                        But if we put aside sympathies and antipathies, both Rerberg and Graf described a disgusting brawl caused by a drunken officer with a dubious reputation.
                        Well, since Mr. Schmidt wasn't satisfied with what he'd achieved and was ultimately kicked off the ship in Madagascar—an uncommon occurrence in the Second Squadron, to put it mildly—the question arises as to the purpose of all these demarches. And "a lack of desire to fight" seems to be the best answer.
                      9. 0
                        26 November 2025 09: 22
                        Actually, Schmidt was written off due to kidney disease in Port Said.
                      10. 0
                        26 November 2025 11: 22
                        Have you considered looking at this from a different perspective? It turns out that, judging by available sources based on the recollections of former colleagues, a mentally unstable, epileptic man with a medical diagnosis of "schizophrenia with delusions of grandeur" was practically forcibly retained in positions of considerable responsibility and command in the military and civil service, despite his frivolity and complete unsuitability for the positions he held? That's already somewhat damaging. Developing this theme, it's logical to assume that this was hardly an isolated incident. To put it mildly, it's unfortunate with his command (after all, Chukhnin himself allegedly handled him back in Vladivostok) and the officer corps in general...
                      11. 0
                        26 November 2025 12: 40
                        Quote: Lynnot
                        After all, it turns out that, judging by accessible sources based on the recollections of former colleagues, a mentally unstable, epileptic man with a medical diagnosis of "schizophrenia with delusions of grandeur" was almost forcibly kept in fairly responsible, command positions in the military and civil service, despite his frivolity and complete unsuitability for the positions he held?

                        Alas. There weren't enough competent officers even for warships, let alone transports and support vessels. They were sent there as a last resort.
                        Again, Pyotr Petrovich's father and uncle were admirals and heroes of the First Defense of Sevastopol. The latter was also the senior flag officer of the Baltic Fleet and a senator. How can you expect such a person to serve?
                        And so we finished kissing...
                        Quote: Lynnot
                        To put it delicately, it's sad with his command (after all, it seems Chukhnin himself was already in charge of it in Vladivostok) and the officer corps in general...

                        Just because Schmidt was, excuse me, a weirdo (with a different letter) doesn't mean all officers were like that. But yes, there were such individuals.
                      12. +1
                        26 November 2025 19: 54
                        ...does not mean that all officers were the same.

                        That's what it all hinges on. In general, the official "lone lunatic" theory has been, is, and will likely remain relevant in high-profile incidents, because it's quite convenient.
                      13. 0
                        17 December 2025 09: 57
                        Here we need to remember who his relatives were. That's why they kept him. There are still plenty of such relatives everywhere. They're just called effective managers now.
                      14. 0
                        26 November 2025 08: 13
                        And considering the position that G.K. Graf himself occupied at the time on the Irtysh transport, he could have written very unflattering words about the senior officer, P.P. Schmidt.
                      15. 0
                        26 November 2025 08: 21
                        And this proves that Schmidt punched his own commander in the face, not someone else's lieutenant?
                        Oh well...
    2. +3
      24 November 2025 14: 34
      Yes, - . Permanently considering herself "overlooked" at work...

      Quietly, as the deputy commander for political affairs, he recruited 15-20 of the large anti-submarine ship's crew to join his "team." The rest, including the officers, he locked in the "ship's club" under armed "guard." He first lured Potulny (the commander) into the hold, disarmed him, and locked him there...

      However, the midshipman there "slipped" ashore along the mooring lines at the very beginning of this chaos. He reported to command what was happening on the ship... But, as usual, the "naval superiors," especially the "career political officers," didn't believe him at first... And they wasted time...

      And then, the Air Force (and not the naval one at all) had to take the rap... Oh, there was a lot of "interesting" in all this "boss-managerial" fuss... Of the generals, perhaps only the air division commander, General Andreyev, conducted himself with dignity and didn't let down any of his subordinates... On the contrary, he quite openly explained to the various "commissions" that rushed in to see what he had to say about the organization of this "arrest" by his superiors...
      1. +4
        24 November 2025 15: 12
        Quote: ABC-schütze
        Of the generals, perhaps only the air division commander, General Andreev, conducted himself with dignity and did not let down any of his subordinates.

        He was then sent as the head of the school - ChVVAKUSH, they took it out on him.
        He was the best headmaster at the school, but it was a pity he didn't last long. Then they ate him too.
      2. 0
        24 November 2025 19: 46
        But the brigade commander of the Riga PSKR brigade, Captain 1st Rank Neipert, refused to give his subordinates the order to fire live ammunition.
  2. +8
    24 November 2025 08: 10
    I command the fleet. Schmidt


    The red-haired man had become quite accustomed to the situation and quite sensibly, albeit monotonously, recounted the contents of the mass-produced brochure "Mutiny on Ochakov" (C) lol
    1. +3
      24 November 2025 08: 23
      Quote: Olgovich
      I command the fleet. Schmidt


      The red-haired man had become quite accustomed to the situation and quite sensibly, albeit monotonously, recounted the contents of the mass-produced brochure "Mutiny on Ochakov" (C) lol

      Spot on... It's time for the author to change his name to Alexander Balaganov!
    2. -6
      24 November 2025 14: 55
      Quote: Olgovich
      The red-haired man had become quite accustomed to the situation and quite sensibly, albeit monotonously, recounted the contents of the mass-produced brochure "Mutiny on Ochakov (c)

      "Olgovichi residents and dogs are not allowed." Welcome to the RKMP. laughing
  3. +8
    24 November 2025 09: 22
    When V.I. Lenin said that cinema is the most important of the arts, he certainly knew what he was talking about.
    Let's take the well-known Soviet film "We'll Live Till Monday"
    The history teacher (actor V. Tikhonov) heartily tells his students the love story of Schmidt and a lady that happened on the train over the course of half an hour.
    He tells it in a way that might bring tears to the eyes of the impressionable, but what really happened was a fleeting encounter between a psychopath and a lady (he was married, by the way).
    Further correspondence with this fellow traveler.
    After Schmidt's execution—fanfares, obelisks, monuments—then everything died down. Relatives changed their names, his wife disowned him, his son fled with Wrangel's army, and only a random fellow traveler on the train kept her wits about her—she provided the Soviet authorities with all her correspondence with Schmidt and subsequently received a lifetime pension. Such is the great power of love and cinema.
    1. +6
      24 November 2025 13: 29
      This is the great power of love and cinema.

      *Mail Romance*, a film by Evgeny Matveyev about these events.
  4. 12+
    24 November 2025 11: 18
    Many of the sailors were blue-collar workers. The navy became armored and steam-powered, and the ships had complex internal components. Therefore, more literate people were recruited to serve the ships. Young workers had some education and were well-read. Consequently, revolutionary propaganda had an influence on them. Underground revolutionary cells formed in the navy.

    An admiral in the early 20th century wrote that the navy faced a difficult choice: loyalty or professionalism. You couldn't recruit peasants loyal to the tsar onto ships, because technical skills required knowledge. And recruiting educated workers onto ships was dangerous, because they were infected with revolutionary spirit.
    But the worst began when the ship went into repairs. To save money, some of the work was carried out by the crew, who inevitably came into contact with the factory workers and became imbued with revolutionary ideas.
  5. +3
    24 November 2025 17: 07
    It wasn't just the sailors who were experiencing changes in their social makeup. Non-nobles began to join the officer ranks.
    A little background information:
    Participation of non-nobles in the officer corps of the Russian Imperial Navy in the early 20th century
    Non-nobles (from the bourgeoisie, peasants, clergy, and other classes) served as officers in the Russian Imperial Navy (RIVMF) in the early 20th century, but this was a relatively rare occurrence and strictly regulated by the class norms of the Russian Empire. The naval officer corps remained predominantly noble, but reforms and practical needs (especially after the Russo-Japanese War of 1904–1905) opened the door to representatives of other classes.
    1. Legislative basis and class restrictions
    Tradition of Nobility: In the 19th century, naval officers were primarily recruited from noble families. The Naval Corps (the main educational institution for officer training, founded in 1701) was initially elite and required noble birth. According to the "Charter on Military Service" of 1874 and the "Regulations on Service" of 1884, non-nobles could join the corps only with the emperor's permission or after a certain period of service in the lower ranks (as sailors or non-commissioned officers), making the path to officer rank long and arduous.
    Changes in the late 19th and early 20th centuries: After the Crimean War (1853–1856) and the reforms of Alexander II, the navy began to modernize. Beginning in the 1860s, the Naval Corps became accessible to non-nobles from "privileged" classes (such as honorary citizens). By the 1900s, according to the Naval Ministry, approximately 10–15% of cadets were non-nobles. Full equality of classes in the army and navy was introduced only in 1912 (the "Law on Universal Military Service"), but its implementation in the navy was slow due to the conservatism of the elite.
    2. Practice of participation of non-nobles
    Before the Russo-Japanese War (1900–1904): Participation was minimal. Most officers (approximately 80–90%) were of noble origin. Those of non-noble descent more often served in engineering or technical units (for example, as naval engineers or artillerymen), which required specialized knowledge. Examples: Mikhail Petrovich Bestuzhev-Ryumin (from a bourgeois background, became an officer in the 1890s, but this was an exception).
    After the Russo-Japanese War (1905–1914): Defeat in the war led to reforms under Admiral Ivan Grigorovich (Minister of the Navy 1911–1917). The navy needed personnel, so the recruitment of non-nobles into the Naval Corps and the Cadet Schools (from 1906) was increased. By the 1910s, the proportion of non-nobles among junior officers (midshipmen and lieutenants) had grown to 20–25%. They were often promoted based on merit (for example, in artillery or mine units).
    World War I (1914–1917): A shortage of officers (due to losses and mobilization) led to an accelerated promotion of non-nobles to officer rank. According to the General Staff, in 1915–1916, approximately 15% of new naval officers were from non-noble families. They served on battleships, cruisers, and submarines (for example, in the Baltic and Black Sea Fleets). However, the highest ranks (captains of the first and second ranks, admirals) remained almost exclusively noble.
    Engineering section of the officer corps in the Russian Imperial Navy (1900–1910)
    Between 1900 and 1910, engineering officers (naval engineers, mechanics, gunners, minelayers, etc.) played a key role in naval modernization, especially after the defeat in the Russo-Japanese War (1904–1905), when Russia began intensive construction of new ships (Sevastopol-class battleships, cruisers, and submarines). Engineering positions were more open to non-nobles than command positions, as they required technical skills and education rather than exclusive noble birth. However, class barriers remained, and nobles dominated the senior ranks.
    1. Organization and structure of the engineering department
    Engineer categories: The engineering part included:
    Naval engineers (ship builders and repairers): They were engaged in the design, construction and repair of ships at shipyards (for example, in St. Petersburg, Nikolaev, Sevastopol).
    Mechanics and machinists: Maintained the operation of steam engines, turbines, and motors on ships.
    Artillerymen and miners: Specialized in artillery, torpedoes and minelaying (especially relevant after the war of 1904-1905, when the fleet was rearming).
    Electricians and radio specialists: A new field related to the electrification of ships and radio communications (since the 1900s, they were introduced on battleships and cruisers).
    Ranks and Titles: Engineers held ranks ranging from junior (mechanical engineer, lieutenant engineer) to senior (captain engineer, major general of the fleet). They reported to the Naval Ministry but often worked alongside commanding officers on ships.
    Number of officers: By 1910, the engineering unit numbered approximately 800–1000 officers (out of a total naval corps of approximately 5000 officers). The proportion of engineers increased from 15% in 1900 to 20% in 1910 due to technological progress.
    2. Training and education
    Educational institutions:
    Naval Engineering Corps (founded in 1798, reformed in the 1900s): Trained naval engineers. Entry was relatively open to non-nobles from the 1860s, but a secondary education and examinations were required. From 1900–1910, the corps graduated 50–70 engineers per year; approximately 30–40% of graduates were non-nobles (from the bourgeoisie, merchants, and peasants).
    Nikolaev Naval Academy (since 1877): Offered advanced training courses in mechanics and artillery. Non-nobles could enroll after serving in the navy (minimum three years), but nobles had priority.
    Specialized schools: the Artillery School in Kronstadt (for miners and artillerymen) and mechanics' schools. After 1905, accelerated courses were introduced for enlisted men (sailors), where non-nobles could obtain officer ranks in one to two years of study.
    Class-based aspects: Nobles (approximately 70–80% of the engineering ranks) often financed their education themselves or through family connections. Non-nobles (20–30%) advanced through merit, especially in technical roles. The 1906 Law on Military Service eased access for "educated non-nobles," but imperial permission was required for the highest ranks.
    3. Composition: nobles vs. non-nobles
    Nobles: Dominated leadership positions (chief engineers of shipyards, department heads). Many were from officer families (tradition of passing on the profession). Examples: Admiral-Engineer Alexander Alekseevich Brandt (nobleman, head of battleship construction).
    Non-nobles: Their share increased from 15% in 1900 to 25–30% in 1910, especially among mechanics and artillerymen. They often came from the bourgeoisie (merchants, artisans) and peasants, with a technical education (real schools, institutes). Reasons for the increase: Post-war personnel shortages, a focus on technology (steam turbines, electricity). Non-nobles faced discrimination (slow advancement, lower salaries), but their achievements (for example, in ship repair) allowed them to achieve the rank of captain.
    Statistics: According to the Naval Ministry (reports from 1908–1910), non-nobles made up 22% of the engineering staff of the Baltic Fleet, and 28% of the Black Sea Fleet (more due to industrial growth in the southern regions).
    In the 1900s and 1910s, the engineering section was a dynamic segment of the navy, where non-nobles had a better chance of success than in command roles, thanks to technical requirements and reforms after 1905. Their contributions accelerated modernization, but class barriers remained, limiting senior positions.
  6. +3
    24 November 2025 17: 19
    Well, now few people can say who this Schmidt is, except that he's a lieutenant. Although there are streets named after Schmidt (for example, in Bataysk).
    But the lieutenant's "sons" are well known: Shura Balaganov, Panikovsky, and, of course, Ostap-Suleiman-Santa-Maria Bender-bey. It would be a mistake to include Adam Kozlevich (a Pole) among these relatives—he was simply a fellow traveler and part-time driver for the "sons."
  7. +1
    24 November 2025 17: 54
    In some places it's written right according to the good old Glavpur templates, it brought a tear to my eye with nostalgia :)

    At the same time, the Bolsheviks themselves dealt with such armed uprisings (and peaceful ones too) no less, if not more decisively and mercilessly: both at the beginning (Kronstadt) and at the end (the large anti-submarine ship “Storozhevoy”).
  8. +2
    24 November 2025 22: 23
    a popular revolutionary in the city

    Schmidt is as much a revolutionary as a wolf's tail is a jackhammer.
    A swindler and a mentally unstable adventurer.
    According to Russian naval tradition, upon retirement, an officer was promoted to the next rank. Schmidt was expelled from the navy in disgrace and did not receive the next rank of captain 2nd rank, remaining a lieutenant.
  9. +3
    25 November 2025 07: 38
    The article is a libel against Lieutenant Schmidt in the spirit of today's anti-Bolshevik agenda.
  10. 0
    25 November 2025 20: 59
    Long live scented soap!

    "But by the beginning of the 20th century, the empire had reached a 'transition point.' The problem of the 'boiling cauldron' needed to be resolved. Almost all the last Russian emperors understood this, but they never decided on a radical change, a 'revolution from above.'"

    How many and which Russian emperors are these? And which emperors decided on a radical change?

    "And the Russian Empire had accumulated a ton of problems and issues... (half of the engineers in the country were Germans, foreigners)."
    So where are the Russian Samsons and Samsonovs in the chronicles?
  11. 0
    25 November 2025 21: 09
    Quote: pudelartemon
    a popular revolutionary in the city

    Schmidt is as much a revolutionary as a wolf's tail is a jackhammer.
    A swindler and a mentally unstable adventurer.
    According to Russian naval tradition, upon retirement, an officer was promoted to the next rank. Schmidt was expelled from the navy in disgrace and did not receive the next rank of captain 2nd rank, remaining a lieutenant.


    Captrie? Or lieutenant? Or was a lieutenant colonel supposed to follow a lieutenant?
    No need for "on land" or "on water".
    Everywhere they served, both conscript and hereditary.
    1. 0
      26 November 2025 08: 15
      Quote from Fangaro
      Captry?

      There was no such title in the Table of Ranks.
      Quote from Fangaro
      Or was it then that after a lieutenant, a lieutenant colonel was supposed to be promoted?

      Yes. If I remember correctly, from 1886 to 1907 there was no intermediate rank between lieutenant and captain second rank.
      Quote from Fangaro
      No need for "on land" or "on water".
      Everywhere they served, both conscript and hereditary.

      ?
  12. 0
    8 March 2026 10: 34
    Well, it's clear he's an adventurer, the forerunner of that whole hooligan campaign that emerged during the Civil War. They were simply trying to make him into an ideological figure, but he's not. And his children are just as good.