Rising accident rate among US military aircraft

5 525 26
Rising accident rate among US military aircraft


aviation Units and components of all branches of the US Armed Forces actively operate their equipment and carry out assigned missions. However, they face the problem of accidents—various incidents and accidents, including the most serious ones, regularly occur. As it turns out, these statistics have worsened in recent years, and lawmakers are demanding urgent action to rectify the situation.



Question of classification


The Pentagon divides aviation accidents, crashes, and other incidents into five categories. They are designated by letters from "A" (most severe) to "E" (minor). This classification determines the specifics of recording and maintaining statistics, sets investigation deadlines, etc.

Class "A" incidents include those resulting in fatalities or permanent disabilities. This category also includes incidents involving the loss of aircraft, including unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) of Groups 1, 2, and 3. Another criterion for Class "A" incidents is damage exceeding $2,5 million.

By comparison, incidents classified as Category E involve damage of no more than $25, with victims requiring only first aid or no first aid at all.

Disclosure of data


The relevant Pentagon agencies monitor aircraft operations, meticulously collect statistics on accidents and incidents, and conduct investigations into their causes. Some of this information, which is not classified as a state secret, is regularly published publicly.


For example, overall aviation accident rates for fiscal years 2020 through 2024 were recently released. They were published by Democratic Senator Elizabeth Warren. She revealed key figures and statistics, and also highlighted a number of alarming trends.

Overall, there has been an increase in the number and frequency of various types of incidents, including loss of equipment and personnel fatalities. Furthermore, the overall monetary damage has increased. Therefore, urgent measures are being proposed to reduce accidents and the damage they cause to equipment and the military budget.

Senator E. Warren also asked Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth to release data for the past fiscal year, 2025. This information will supplement existing statistics and show how the situation is developing.

General indicators


The Pentagon's published data covers aviation across all branches of the US Armed Forces. It includes loss and incident statistics for the Air Force, as well as for the Army, Navy, and Marine Corps. It covers a period of nearly five years—from the beginning of fiscal year 2020 (October 2019) to July 2024. More recent statistics covering the situation in 2025 are, for obvious reasons, not yet available.

Over the past five years, the armed forces recorded 4280 incidents of all categories, from "A" to "E." These resulted in the destruction or write-off of 89 aircraft, as well as the deaths of 90 military personnel and civilians. The total damage amounted to $9,4 billion.


During the period under review, statistics steadily declined, both for the armed forces as a whole and for individual branches and services. In fiscal year 2020, there were 1,3 Class A accidents per 100 flight hours. In fiscal year 2024, this figure increased to 2,2 accidents per 100 flight hours.

Marine aviation demonstrated the worst performance. In FY2020, it had 1,33 accidents per 100 flight hours, and for the first 10 months of FY2024, it had 3,91. Army aviation began the five-year period with 0,76 accidents and ended it with 2,02 accidents. Naval aviation deteriorated its performance from 1,12 to 1,76 accidents. The Air Force showed the best performance, with 1,72 accidents in FY2020 and 1,9 accidents in FY2024.

It is noted that almost all types of aviation saw their rates increase over the five-year period and peaked in fiscal 2024. The only exception was naval aviation, which saw its worst performance, 1,98 Class A accidents per 100 hours, in fiscal 2022.

The damage from the most severe accidents is noteworthy. In the 2020-22 fiscal years, it did not exceed $1,6 billion annually. However, in 2023, there was a sharp jump to $2,9 billion. Over the first 10 months of the 2024 fiscal year, it reached $1,7 billion. This figure will be slightly higher in the full-year statistics.

Emergency equipment


Statistics on the types of lost equipment were also published. During the specified period, the armed forces were forced to decommission 89 aircraft of various models and modifications. Moreover, some types showed a higher accident rate.

The UH-60 family of helicopters recorded 23 accidents per 100 flight hours. They are actively used by various branches of the military and operate in a variety of conditions. Combined with potential operational irregularities, this creates increased risks and skews the overall statistics.


F/A-18E/F carrier-based fighter-bombers and C-130 military transport aircraft are also actively used. From 2020-24, they each reported 21 accidents per 100 flight hours.

The V-22 tiltrotor aircraft operation statistics deserve special consideration. Their accident rate across various branches of the military does not exceed 8-10 incidents per 100 hours. However, just four Class A accidents, which occurred between 2022 and 24, claimed the lives of 20 service members. This represents more than a fifth of all personnel losses.

Problems and solutions


Thus, in recent years, the US military has faced a serious problem in the form of an increase in aircraft accidents. This is accompanied by an increase in casualties and material damage. Clearly, this problem requires urgent resolution. The Pentagon must take measures to reduce all negative indicators.

According to available data, flight accidents and crashes occur for a variety of reasons. Publicly available materials list errors by flight and technical personnel at various stages of flight preparation and execution as prerequisites and immediate causes. A certain number of accidents are also due to sudden equipment failures.

Another cause of crashes is improper flight and/or combat operations management. For example, in December 2024, the Navy lost an F/A-18E/F fighter jet to friendly fire—it was hit by an American warship's anti-aircraft system. In January 2025, a military helicopter collided with a passenger jet in Washington, D.C. An investigation revealed that improper flight route planning near the airport was one of the factors that contributed to the accident.


There's also a conspiracy theory explaining the rise in negative indicators. It claims the Pentagon is fabricating accident reports to cover up personnel losses in covert operations. Indirect evidence of this is the increase in accidents since 2022—after the US began aiding Ukraine.

It's easy to see how the Pentagon should address aviation equipment accidents. Incoming equipment must be monitored and its quality monitored. Airplanes, helicopters, and UAVs must also be serviced promptly and efficiently, in compliance with all standards and requirements.

Human error, particularly in flight crews, remains one of the main causes of accidents. Therefore, attention must be paid to pilot and operator training, as well as their preparedness to operate in any conditions, including difficult and dangerous ones.

Perhaps, increasing the level of automation in aviation technology will help reduce the impact of human error. Various electronics will reduce the workload on humans and offer certain advantages. However, they may also create new risks that also require attention.

Real measures


The US Department of Defense, through its relevant regulatory agencies, closely monitors the aviation situation, including accident rates. Necessary investigations are being conducted, new guidance documents are being issued, etc.

However, all these measures appear to be failing to address the existing problems. Despite the Pentagon's best efforts, the accident rate is rising and is causing concern. Moreover, the issue is already being brought to the Congressional level. Whether the pressing issues can be resolved with the participation of lawmakers is a big question.
26 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -1
    27 November 2025 04: 05
    clipping their wings is one way to reduce the accident rate wink
    1. +3
      27 November 2025 05: 25
      Quote: Taskmaster
      clipping their wings is one way to reduce the accident rate wink

      No, it's easier to keep everything under wraps. No statistics, no accidents...
  2. kig
    +4
    27 November 2025 05: 15
    To laugh at the Americans, you have to compare their statistics with someone else's, who has an air force of similar size and quality. And there are no others like them in the world. So, as Comrade Stalin once said: what are we going to do? We'll envy them.
    1. +1
      27 November 2025 07: 49
      What does the quantity, let alone the quality, of the Air Force have to do with this? If we take into account the severity and number of incidents per 100 flight hours, then we can compare them with similar structures in any country.
      The icing on the cake is that the Yankees often pass off combat losses as accidents. They don't want to spoil their combat loss statistics. The Marine Corps had the most incidents? Well, the Marines are the ones most often in "hot spots."
      1. 0
        27 November 2025 17: 44
        Quote: Illanatol
        The Marine Corps had the most incidents? Well, the Marines are most often in "hot spots"...
        These poor guys fly Harriers, they fight even without hot spots.
      2. kig
        -1
        27 November 2025 19: 43
        Quote: Illanatol
        It can be compared with a similar structure of any state.

        I agree. But where is this comparison?
        1. 0
          28 November 2025 09: 15
          Quote: kig
          I agree. But where is this comparison?


          This question is in the wrong place. Please forward it to the author of the article. If you're interested, look it up yourself, but I'm not sure the information from open sources will be accurate. Such things are usually kept under wraps.
    2. +1
      27 November 2025 15: 43
      And also compare the number of flight hours of the US Air Force, then we can talk about the accident rate.
  3. +2
    27 November 2025 05: 52
    Has anyone included a racial component in their statistics? For example, I recently read that the percentage of non-whites in the British Air Force has grown significantly, and with that, the accident rate has increased. Don't think me racist, but these are the facts.
    1. +1
      27 November 2025 07: 02
      Has anyone included a racial component in their statistics? For example, I recently read that the percentage of non-whites in the British Air Force has grown significantly, and with that, the accident rate has increased. Don't think me racist, but these are the facts.

      Race doesn't matter. What matters is the system that educates and develops a person.
      You and the black man have the same body. You and he both have five fingers and toes, two eyes, and so on. The same brain, after all. And whatever is implanted in the brain and how it's implanted is what a person will do.
      Of course, culture, education, and logical thinking all play a role. But if we take representatives of several races and raise them in the same conditions with the same education, they won't differ.
      1. +5
        27 November 2025 11: 03
        Quote: Naofumi
        Race doesn't matter. What matters is the system that educates and develops a person.

        It's not just training and development that's important, but also equal expectations. Otherwise, it will be like the South African Air Force, where affirmative action against whites led to the complete degradation of flight and maintenance personnel. Even with equal training conditions, racially loyal black cadets simply saw no need to study—they'd pass their exams and be accepted into the service regardless of their grades. And this happened not only in the Air Force but in other branches of the armed forces as well.
        And the most remarkable thing is that after several years of this bacchanalia, the equipment destroyed by local black-market workers was restored by equally black-market specialists—from Cuba. And, unlike the locals, they did a high-quality job.
        Cuba's participation in vehicle repair and maintenance has expanded to include the maintenance and repair of Class A, B, C and D vehicles for all services and divisions; carrying out conservation of cars of classes A and B for the army and the Military Medical Service; dismantling of class B vehicles for the same services; inventory, organization and management of army warehouses; maintenance and repair of components and spare parts for vehicles of various services and departments; maintenance and repair of transport aircraft and helicopters of the South African Air Force, as well as maintenance, repair and manufacture of test benches and avionics components for aviation units, maintenance and repair of medical equipment of the Military Medical Service.

        Justifying Cuba's involvement in vehicle repairs, Defence Minister Mapisa-Nqakula said that at the Army Support Base (ASB) Western Cape, at the start of Project Thusano (as Cuban assistance to the South African armed forces is known), the serviceability of equipment was 35%, while currently the serviceability of equipment at the base is 84%.
        Marchesi's deautate colleague Cobus Marais, who deals with defense and military veterans, was told by the defense minister that the Cubans had repaired more than 11000 cars in the six years of the Thusano project.
        © bmpd
        1. 0
          27 November 2025 12: 01
          It's not just training and development that's important, but also equal expectations. Otherwise, it will be like the South African Air Force, where affirmative action against whites led to the complete degradation of flight and maintenance personnel. Even with equal training conditions, racially loyal black cadets simply saw no need to study—they'd pass their exams and be accepted into the service regardless of their grades. And this happened not only in the Air Force but in other branches of the armed forces as well.
          And the most remarkable thing is that after several years of this bacchanalia, the equipment destroyed by local black-market workers was restored by equally black-market specialists—from Cuba. And, unlike the locals, they did a high-quality job.

          And then we immediately recall the Tuskegee Airmen, who worked their asses off to be as good as white people. And they were at least as good!
          1. 0
            27 November 2025 15: 48
            Look at basketball, football, track and field, and sports in general, who are the best there? Don't forget about Formula 1, who is one of the best there?
    2. kig
      -1
      27 November 2025 19: 25
      British football teams have a lot of non-white players, and these teams have started to perform very well in European competitions. Don't call me racist, but it's a fact.
  4. +2
    27 November 2025 09: 08
    Quote: Naofumi
    But if we take representatives of several races, raise them in the same conditions with the same education, they will not differ.
    Don't talk nonsense! In the US, races have been bred under identical conditions for several generations. wink
    1. +2
      27 November 2025 11: 07
      Quote: Schneeberg
      Don't talk nonsense! In the US, races have been bred under identical conditions for several generations.

      Nope. They have a seesaw of discrimination. Either white robes and flaming crosses, or black riots over police brutality by "white oppressors" against black people. I don't recall a white riot over the death of a white repeat offender with five prison terms while being detained by a black cop. wink
  5. +1
    27 November 2025 09: 08
    For now, this is all abstract.
    There was once an article roughly comparing them to us. The conclusion was roughly: Their accident rate is roughly the same as ours.
    According to other articles, however, it turned out that the Americans fly approximately 3 times more often (flight hours).
    But I could be wrong.
    1. 0
      27 November 2025 10: 24
      Well, an airplane is heavier than air. The fact that they fall, from a worldview perspective, is perfectly normal. They've started flying more often, maybe they've started introducing some new regulations. lol, and so they fell. Anyway, they're still a long way from the WWII record of three (maybe four) times more non-combat losses than combat losses. Who remembers which aircraft distinguished itself?
      1. 0
        28 November 2025 11: 49
        Quote: Grossvater
        Anyway, we're still a long way from the WWII record of three (maybe four) times more non-combat losses than combat losses.

        I'm afraid that this record has been broken by virtually every peacetime aircraft. For example, the Yak-38 or Tu-22, all losses were non-combat.
  6. +2
    27 November 2025 10: 20
    Quote: Schneeberg
    Don't take me for a racist, but these are the facts.

    One of my acquaintances, by the way, one of ours, who at one time coached the national team of one European country in one of the water sports, told me almost the same phrase.
    1. +3
      27 November 2025 11: 09
      Quote: Grossvater
      One of my acquaintances, by the way, one of ours, who at one time coached the national team of one European country in one of the water sports, told me almost the same phrase.

      With sports, everything is simple:
      Blacks traditionally lead in running, and whites in shooting. © smile
  7. +1
    27 November 2025 11: 05
    Quote: Grossvater
    in one of the water sports, he told me almost the same phrase
    Well, in sports, they can overtake anyone. wink
    1. 0
      27 November 2025 12: 01
      Well, no way! Not in everything.
  8. 0
    27 November 2025 20: 18
    Yeah, they're just churning out flight hours. According to the military transport aviation (VTA) on the C-130. 100,000 flight hours in 4 years. And there are about 70 of them. 25,000 flight hours per year! Our M are just dreams. And don't laugh.
  9. 0
    28 November 2025 09: 17
    Quote: Schneeberg
    Don't talk nonsense! In the US, races have been bred under identical conditions for several generations.


    Where, in flasks? Whites, blacks, and Latinos live there in very different conditions.
  10. 0
    28 November 2025 09: 21
    Quote: Max1995
    There was once an article roughly comparing them to us. The conclusion was roughly: Their accident rate is roughly the same as ours.
    According to other articles, however, it turned out that the Americans fly approximately 3 times more often (flight hours).


    Accident rates are always calculated per a specific number of flight hours; otherwise, the comparison is invalid. That is, whether an aircraft flies more or less frequently doesn't significantly impact the figures. The number of accidents per 100 hours, period.
    Those who fly more often and more often, on the one hand, have more experience and practical skills, on the other hand, fatigue has not been cancelled.