Vladimir Kappel in service in the Tsarist army and the Komuch troops

9 598 131
Vladimir Kappel in service in the Tsarist army and the Komuch troops


Today I'd like to offer you another article from the "Faces of the Civil War" series, and we'll discuss Vladimir Oskarovich Kappel. Many know him from the famous "psychic attack" scene from the Soviet film "Chapayev."



Let us immediately note that the troops of the Red Division Commander and Kappel operated in different directions and never clashed with each other.

It's unfortunate to admit that the liberal Fifth Column's long-standing efforts to dumb down our children have been successful—many schoolchildren and even students haven't seen the Vasiliev brothers' film (or other great Soviet films), and so this factor is gradually losing its significance. It's becoming more and more important. story With the so-called "Kolchak's gold": it was Kappel who, in early August 1917, seized enormous valuables in Kazan, evacuated to that city from storage facilities in Warsaw, Riga, Kyiv, Moscow, and Petrograd—effectively stealing them from our country. They ultimately fell into the hands of the incompetent self-proclaimed "Supreme Ruler" Kolchak, who was unable to even properly manage the untold riches that fell into his hands.

However, Kappel himself received fairly favorable reviews from the Whites, and neutral ones from the Reds. The fact that he, despite being a rather serious opponent of the new government, is little known in our country (unlike Shkuro, Mamontov, Krasnov, and others) suggests that Kappel was not known for his particular atrocities against civilians. And in the same film, "Chapayev," the "Kappelites" are portrayed not as unbridled robbers and marauders, but as steadfast, disciplined fighters, calmly launching a hopeless "psychic attack." However, doubts arise about the sanity of Kappel himself, who allegedly sent elite troops virtually "to the slaughter"—under machine gun fire.


"Psychic Attack," a still from the film "Chapaev"

This episode, by the way, was clearly parodied in the film "Bumbarash," where the gang of the ataman Sofya Tulchinskaya attacks a village occupied by the Red Army:


Apparently, Kappel was a very good general and a completely honest and decent man who, unfortunately, chose the wrong side, doomed to defeat from the start.

The origin and beginning of the military service of the article's hero


Vladimir Kappel is another representative of the so-called Baltic nobility of the Russian Empire. Although relatively few in number, the Baltic Germans traditionally held high positions at the imperial court, served honorably, and had tangible accomplishments – the Buxhoevedens, Rosens, Fersen, Rosenbergs, Benckendorffs, Essens, Völkersams, Kotzebues, Osten-Sackens, Wrangels, Pahlens, Nesselrodes, Bellingshausens, and others. The Kappel family was Swedish in origin and Lutheran in faith. Many of its members traditionally chose military service. Vladimir Kappel's father, Oskar Pavlovich, served in the Imperial Russian Army from 1867 to 1878. He served in Turkestan, taking part in several battles against the forces of local rulers, rising from cadet to staff captain, and receiving the Soldier's Cross of St. George, 4th Class, the Order of St. Anne, 4th Class with the inscription "For Bravery," and the Order of St. Stanislav, 3rd Class with swords and bow. From 1881, he served in the gendarmerie units and retired with the rank of captain. His maternal grandfather, Pyotr Postopolsky, rose to the rank of lieutenant general and, as a staff captain, served among the defenders of Sevastopol during the Crimean War.

Vladimir Oskarovich was born in Tsarskoye Selo on April 16 (28), 1883. He studied at the 2nd Cadet Corps, then at the prestigious Nikolaevsky Cavalry School, whose graduates included many other very famous participants in the Civil War, such as Pyotr Wrangel, Andrei Shkura (Shkuro), Don Ataman Afrikan Bogaevsky, and Ataman of the Orenburg Cossacks Alexander Dutov, as well as the Imperial Minister of War Vladimir Sukhomlinov and Karl Mannerheim. V. Kappel graduated from the Cavalry School in 1903. "first class with promotion to cornet with seniority"He began his service in the 54th Novomirgorod Dragoon Regiment, located near Warsaw (in 1907 it became the 17th Novomirgorod Uhlan Regiment).

In 1906, this unit was sent to the Perm province, where it took part in the liquidation of a large rebel detachment of "Lbovtsy" ("forest brothers").


Alexander Mikhailovich Lbov

Alexander Lbov, a renowned Ural revolutionary and expropriator, became the subject of A. Gaidar's book "Life for Nothing (Lbovshchina)." The author wrote in the preface:

This story is in memory of Alexander Lbov, a man who knew no path to the new, yet hated the old; an undisciplined, uncontrollable, yet courageous and proud rebel who poured all his hatred into the cold barrel of his ever-present Mauser, before which the watchdogs of autocracy long trembled. In memory of "the robber Lbov" and his comrades: Demon, Thunder, Snake, Foma, Sailor, and many others, whose names are already shrouded in legends about the working-class Urals.


Clipping from the newspaper "Zvezda" dated March 3, 1926

In November 1907, V. Kappel received the position of regimental adjutant – a staff position associated with the administration of the regiment’s drill and registration department, and the organization of internal and guard service.

That same year, V. Kappel married Olga Strolman, the daughter of the head of the Perm artillery factories and an active state councilor (general's rank, fourth class). Apparently, this young officer was an unenviable suitor, and so he had to marry his chosen one in secret. Olga's parents only recognized the marriage after their son-in-law enrolled at the General Staff Academy. In 1910, the couple had a daughter, Tatyana, and in 1917, a son, Kirill.


V. Kappel with his wife and daughter

Vladimir Kappel was held in good esteem by his superiors, and in his 1908 performance appraisal, the commander of the 17th Uhlan Regiment gave him the following characterization:

This senior officer is extremely well-prepared in his duties, having served as regimental adjutant with great diligence, energy, and excellent knowledge. He is of very good moral character and an excellent family man. He is loved by his comrades and enjoys respect among them. He is well-developed and very capable. Tactically, as a line officer, he is very well-prepared… He is not prone to gambling or alcohol… He has a great ability to instill in people a spirit of energy and a desire to serve. He enjoys excellent health and can withstand all the hardships of life on the march.

But his career progressed extremely slowly, and by that same year, 1908, we see him as only a lieutenant. Things began to improve after he studied at the Nikolaev Academy of the General Staff, which he graduated from in 1913, again "first class, with the right to receive advantages during service"He was promoted to staff captain and, for his achievements in military studies, was even awarded the Order of St. Anne, 3rd degree.


V. Kappel in a photograph from 1913.

The topic of the report prepared at that time by V. Kappel is intriguing: "Automobile Service in the Army. The Main Principles of Organizing Automobile Troops." At the time, the work was highly topical and even "innovative."

During World War I, V. Kappel fought on the Southwestern and Romanian fronts – first as a senior adjutant of the headquarters of the 5th Don Cossack Division, then of the 14th Cavalry Division.

He was awarded the Order of St. Vladimir, 4th Class with Swords and Bow, the Order of St. Anne, 2nd Class with Swords, the Order of St. Stanislav, 2nd Class with Swords, the Order of St. Anne, 4th Class, and the Order of St. George, 4th Class. In March 1916, he became a staff officer for assignments in the Office of the Quartermaster General of the Headquarters of the Commander-in-Chief of the Armies of the Southwestern Front. For his role in developing the plan for the Brusilov Offensive, he was promoted to lieutenant colonel in August 1916. It was in this lowly rank that he met the February Revolution. A staunch monarchist, he recognized the futility of restoring the completely discredited tsarist regime; his colleagues recalled his words:

To talk about the monarchy now is only to harm it.

He continued to serve and in September 1917 he held the position of assistant to the chief of the intelligence department of the front headquarters.

At the beginning of October I asked for leave and went to visit my family in Perm.

Vladimir Kappel at the beginning of the civil war


In the spring of 1918, we see Kappel in Samara, where he unexpectedly found himself in a staff position in the Volga Military District of the Red Army. It seemed he had chosen the right side. But in May, the Czechoslovak Corps rebelled. It had been formed in the fall of 1917 as part of the Russian army, but by December it had been subordinated to the French command and ordered to France. On March 26, 1918, representatives of the Czechoslovak Corps command negotiated with the new authorities for free passage through Russian territory to Vladivostok. They were to proceed "as a group of free citizens taking with them a certain number of weapons for self-defense against assassination attempts by counter-revolutionaries"It was noted that

The Council of People's Commissars is ready to provide them with any assistance on the territory of Russia, provided they are honest and sincerely loyal.

The following rules were established:

In each echelon, leave an armed company of 168 people, including non-commissioned officers, and one machine gun for their own protection, 300 rounds for each rifle, and 1200 rounds for the machine gun.

A total of 63 trains, each with 40 carriages, departed for the east; by May they stretched for several thousand kilometers.

The uprising was sparked by an incident in Chelyabinsk, where on May 14, a Czech train encountered a train carrying German and Hungarian prisoners. A German seriously wounded a legionnaire with a cast-iron stove leg, and his comrades killed him. Soviet authorities arrested ten Czechs the following day, but they were freed by other legionnaires on May 17. An escalation ensued, with Aralov and Trotsky issuing orders to disarm the legionnaires, but this proved impossible. Disciplined and well-trained Czechoslovak soldiers quickly routed the few remaining Red Guard units. As a result, anti-Soviet governments emerged along the Trans-Siberian railway. Samara, which the legionnaires entered on June 8, was no exception.


Czechoslovak legionnaires in Samara, June 8, 1918

Following this, a government, the "Committee of Members of the Constituent Assembly" (Komuch), was formed here, with the Socialist Revolutionaries playing a leading role. The governments of the Orenburg Cossack Host, the Ural Cossack Host, and the Provisional Government of the Northern Region, based in Arkhangelsk, agreed to recognize the Komuch's authority. Initially, the Komuch government consisted of only five members; later, its membership increased to 97.


The first committee: Socialist Revolutionaries I. M. Brushvit, P. D. Klimushkin, B. K. Fortunatov, V. K. Volsky (chairman), I. P. Nesterov

Komuch's army numbered 350 men and had two cannons. According to contemporaries, no one at the time wanted to take on the responsibility of becoming "commander-in-chief" of such an insignificant force. One of the officers present at the "elections" recalled:

There were no volunteers for the difficult and responsible role. Everyone stood silently, their eyes cast down. Someone timidly suggested drawing lots. And then, a modest-looking, virtually unknown officer, recently arrived in Samara, stood up and asked to speak:

“Since there are no volunteers, then temporarily, until a senior officer is found, allow me to lead the units against the Bolsheviks,” he said calmly and quietly.

It should be noted that this “modest officer” was at that time an assistant to the chief of the Operations Department of the General Staff.

Thus, the monarchist Kappel became commander of the "People's Army" of the Socialist Revolutionary Komuch. He was, however, a staff officer and had little experience commanding troops. However, it soon became clear that Kappel had the makings of a great military leader.

In the service of Komuch


By June 11, Kappel's small detachment had managed to capture Syzran in a surprise attack. The Reds were unaware of the enemy's small numbers and, embarrassed by the "insolence" of their actions, decided to retreat, fearing encirclement. Having reinforced his unit, Kappel fought successfully at Stavropol (now Tolyatti), Buguruslan, Buzuluk, and Melekess (Dimitrovgrad). The authority of this recently unknown lieutenant colonel grew visibly, on both sides of the front: in an article in the newspaper "Krasnaya Zvezda," Kappel was named "little Napoleon" "This epithet, of course, was intended ironically by the author of the article, but the comparison with the great Corsican was quite flattering. And the personal modesty and unpretentiousness of the commander of the "People's Army" earned him the love of the rank-and-file "volunteers."

On July 21, in alliance with the Czechoslovaks, Kappel succeeded in capturing Simbirsk. That same day, he was appointed commander of all active forces of the "People's Army." Three days later, his unit (the First Volunteer Squad) became a Rifle Brigade, consisting of two regiments and three artillery batteries (light, howitzer, and horse). The total number of fighters reached three and a half thousand. But it was not until August 24, 1918, that Kappel was promoted to colonel.

Meanwhile, the Reds had placed a reward of 50 rubles on his head. Kappel deemed this amount too small, and he declared this in front of his soldiers.

On August 7, Kappel and the Czechoslovaks succeeded in taking Kazan. What happened in the city then can be learned from the account of Menshevik Komuch member I. M. Maisky:

Captured Bolsheviks stood in groups: Red Army soldiers, workers, women—and opposite them, Czech soldiers with raised rifles... A volley rang out, and the prisoners fell. Before my eyes, two groups of fifteen men each were shot. I couldn't bear it any longer. Overcome with indignation, I rushed to the Social Democratic Committee and demanded that a deputation be sent immediately to the military authorities to protest the summary executions. The committee members merely shrugged their shoulders.

In total, approximately 1,500 people were executed in Kazan. And, unfortunately, the events in this city were not isolated. The White Terror is by no means a myth invented by Soviet historians. In March 1918, Kolchak himself ordered General Rozanov to destroy rebellious villages "following the Japanese example" and execute every tenth of their inhabitants. During the suppression of the Yenisei Uprising, up to 8,000 such hostages were executed. For a long time, it was believed that these reprisals were initiated by Rozanov, but the original source has been discovered: the order was signed by the admiral himself.

But let's return to Kazan, captured by Kappel, and we'll see that the Whites' trophies included not only warehouses containing large quantities of weapons, food, and medicine, but also the Russian Empire's gold reserves. These stolen treasures, as we know, ultimately ended up in the hands of Alexander Kolchak, who declared himself "supreme ruler of Russia." According to the testimony of Admiral G.K. Gins, the head of the Council of Ministers of this government:

A. V. Kolchak had at his disposal 43,000 poods (688 tons) of gold and 30,000 poods (480 tons) of silver.

But there were also the imperial family’s jewels, expensive church utensils, and priceless historical relics.

In the next article, we'll discuss the fate of these treasures stolen from our country. We'll also continue the story of Vladimir Kappel, discussing the fall of Komuch, Kappel's career in Kolchak's army, the so-called "Great Siberian Ice March," which became the death throes of the bloody admiral's troops, Kappel's death at the Uta siding, and his descendants in Soviet Russia.
131 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    23 November 2025 04: 19
    The Council of People's Commissars is ready to provide them with any assistance on the territory of Russia, provided they are honest and sincerely loyal.

    The Bolsheviks' gravest mistake and strategic miscalculation was to rely on the loyalty of the Czechs, who were commanded by the French.
    What childish naivety...it later cost our people dearly. what
    Without the support of the Czechoslovakians, Kappel was nothing.
    1. +6
      23 November 2025 05: 32
      What should have been done? The Czechs should have been sent away as quickly as possible, wherever possible. And the Entente ambassadors were working in Russia the whole time. There was no diplomatic isolation. A deal was reached with them. And the fact that personal emotions later flared up, leading to disaster, well, that's just the way things were. A new state, new people. Now Moscow can silence any perpetrator. Which gives us a reason to write our own history here. But back then, there wasn't even much communication. And in politics and the army, there were a bunch of people with completely different views.
      1. +6
        23 November 2025 07: 10
        And back then there wasn't really any connection.
        Communications were indeed in place. Otherwise, how could the Czechoslovak Corps have risen up simultaneously along the entire Trans-Siberian Railway, from Penza to Vladivostok? Telegraph operators, like railroad workers, were one of the most in-demand professions of the time.
        1. +1
          23 November 2025 07: 36
          So, not only everyone had access to the telegraph. It's no wonder Lenin took over the telegraph.
          1. +4
            23 November 2025 07: 40
            Access to the telegraph was limited to those in power in a given locality. Everyone understood: kill a telegraph operator and you'll be left without communication.
            1. +3
              23 November 2025 07: 41
              That's exactly what I'm talking about. Any movie about civil war: someone comes in, thrusts a Mauser at you, and says, "Send this or that." Or let me read it. But they didn't touch the telegraph operator.
            2. +3
              23 November 2025 07: 46
              And who ruled which city in Siberia is a whole other story. It wasn't even the Bolsheviks who executed Kolchak.
              They were talking about Kalandarishvili here. He's considered a Red. But he was an anarchist and led a huge gang that lived off whatever God sent. They were all shot on the winter road along the Lena. The Whites, with their machine guns. I'm 100% sure that if Reds with machine guns had been there, they would have done the same. Then there wouldn't be a Kalandarishvili Street in our city.
              1. +7
                24 November 2025 11: 51
                Quote: MCmaximus
                They were talking about Kalandarishvili here. He's considered a Red. But he was an anarchist and led a huge gang that lived off whatever God sent. They were all shot on the winter road along the Lena. The Whites, with their machine guns. I'm 100% sure that if Reds with machine guns had been there, they would have done the same.

                The state monopoly on violence, however. If you want to fight, enlist in the official security forces and operate "within the law." Don't want to? Well, don't judge me—even if you're a decorated soldier. The Makhnovists are a prime example.
      2. +4
        23 November 2025 08: 04
        And in politics and the army there were a lot of people with completely different views.
        That's true. The future president of the Czechoslovak Socialist Republic, Ludwig Svoboda, participated in the Corps rebellion in Chelyabinsk.
        1. +5
          23 November 2025 08: 41
          Masaryk. And the USSR had good relations with him. And Jaroslav Hasek is a whole other character.
        2. -2
          23 November 2025 09: 25
          Absolutely right. Czechs were all sorts. J. Hasek, for example. However, the overwhelming majority of them simply longed to return to their homeland. And those who interfered with them were accordingly destroyed. Well, as for Kappel... The mere fact that he betrayed and followed the lead of the Socialist Revolutionaries, Mensheviks, and others deserves not idealization, as in the well-known film, but execution.
          1. +4
            23 November 2025 09: 36
            The question arose: whom did Kappel betray?
            1. -1
              23 November 2025 11: 11
              Read the article carefully and understand Yes
    2. +9
      23 November 2025 05: 46
      Quote: The same LYOKHA
      The Bolsheviks' deepest mistake and strategic miscalculation was to rely on the loyalty of the Czechs.

      If you'd read the TRUTH from the spring of 1918, you wouldn't think so. The Czech Legion initially fully SUPPORTED SOVIET POWER. And no Frenchmen commanded them at first. This was later, when an agreement was reached to "expel" them from Russia. There was no money, and the French promised to provide it on the condition that the Czechs withdraw to the Western Front.
      1. +12
        23 November 2025 07: 23
        The Czech Legion initially fully SUPPORTED THE SOVIET POWER.
        Absolutely right. Moreover, he initially refused any contact with representatives of the nascent White movement. And only after Trotsky's order for the complete disarmament of the corps did it begin...
        1. +4
          23 November 2025 13: 37
          Anders' Army - "Czechoslovak Legion 2.0"!
          The Czechs and Slovaks were eager to go home - but why did they have to wash their hands in blood and engage in looting?
          Trotsky forced it?
        2. +1
          23 November 2025 14: 20
          Alexey, as always, you are categorical in your judgments.
          1. 0
            23 November 2025 19: 13
            I'm being categorical, but were the Czechs and Slovaks really nice guys?
            So it turns out?
            1. +1
              23 November 2025 20: 12
              They weren't "nice guys." There are no "nice guys" in civil wars. Especially not for foreigners. But at least the Czechs tried.
              1. +4
                23 November 2025 20: 24
                Were the Czechs trying to be "white and fluffy"?
                "Limits were also established: each echelon would have one guard company of 168 men, armed with rifles and one machine gun, with 300 rounds of ammunition per rifle and 1205 per machine gun. Everything else—rifles, machine guns, and artillery—was to be handed over to a special Bolshevik commission in Penza.
                However, the Czechs abandoned this agreement as soon as the trains had moved a considerable distance away from the advancing Germans. Colonel Stanislav Čeček recalled the soldiers' mood: 

                The soldiers don't know what to say; they hesitate. Then I ask one of them: "Will you surrender your gun?" "I won't," he says. "I'll hide it, but I won't surrender it." I was waiting for this answer. The others, as one, declare: "We won't surrender it; we'll hide it, but we won't surrender it." "Go ahead," I say to them, "tell the others this. I'm of the same opinion: our regiment shouldn't surrender its weapons."

                On May 14, 1918, a seemingly unremarkable event occurred at the Chelyabinsk train station: a departing train carrying Austrian and Hungarian prisoners of war threw an ordinary poker at soldiers of the Czechoslovak Corps, striking a Czech legionnaire of the 3rd Jan Žižka Czechoslovak Rifle Regiment standing on the platform in the head. Enraged Czechs, who hated Austria-Hungary and especially Hungarians, stopped the train and pulled the prisoners from the cars. Ten of them were beaten with rifle butts, and one—Johann Malik, whom the beaten Austrians had pointed out as the culprit—was bayoneted by the enraged Czechs.
                1. -1
                  23 November 2025 20: 46
                  Were the Czechs trying to be "white and fluffy"?
                  Yes, the Czechs tried.
                  1. +1
                    23 November 2025 21: 16
                    Are there any examples of their "hairiness in white"?
                    1. +1
                      24 November 2025 06: 45
                      Until May 14, 1918, the Czechs were quite loyal to the Soviet government, as long as it honored its agreements. Chechek's unit (incidentally, then a lieutenant) arrived in Penza on May 27-28, already aware of the events beyond the Urals and Trotsky's order (May 24).
                      1. +3
                        24 November 2025 08: 58
                        They say there was an interesting division: the Czechs and Slovaks were mostly on the White side, while the Hungarians were mostly on the Red side. And later, at home, the Hungarians explained to the authorities their participation in the civil war on the Bolshevik side: they wanted to beat the hated Czechs and Slovaks.
                      2. +1
                        24 November 2025 10: 42
                        Did Trotsky's order "appear out of nowhere"?
                      3. +2
                        24 November 2025 11: 03
                        Trotsky gave a deliberately impossible order, as if he had not a couple thousand Bolsheviks across the entire Trans-Siberian Railway, but a company of Red Army soldiers at every stop beyond the Urals. This pushed the Czechs toward the Whites.
                      4. +6
                        24 November 2025 11: 09
                        The Czechoslovakians were on their own side!
                        They didn't give a damn about the whites.
                        They were captivated by the dream of their own state and the emerging opportunity to plunder the country that had given them shelter and weapons in their hands!
                        They did not want to go to Murmansk.
                        They were allegedly afraid of German submarines.
                        But according to various sources, "officials from the Entente" ordered some Czechoslovaks to "turn back" to the Russian North.
                        But the "heat-loving beer and porcelain producers" chose the direction of Vladivostok.
                        Away from the front with the Germans!
              2. +5
                23 November 2025 20: 36
                Soon, a squad of police and security officers arrived at the station and decided to arrest all the Czech soldiers involved in the murder of the captive, since "the two Czechoslovak soldiers who were caught answering the question of whether to hand over the culprit: 'We will not hand him over.'"

                Some time later, Lieutenant Colonel Sergei Voitsekhovsky, commander of the 3rd Regiment, sent a delegation to the city authorities demanding the release of the arrested soldiers. But the delegation members were also imprisoned.

                Lieutenant Colonel Voitsehovsky sounded the alarm and ordered preparations for battle. By 6:00 PM, armed legionnaires had effectively captured the city. Local security officers and Soviet deputies were detained, many of whom were summarily executed.


                Many of whom... were shot!
                1. +5
                  25 November 2025 03: 54
                  I'm really curious about the motives behind these people's portrayals of Czechoslovakians as cuties, literally forced to revolt and, in the heat of the moment, shooting Russian citizens left and right, while simultaneously robbing everything and everyone. I wish Russians had behaved like that in 68. But what about an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth? Ah, yes, that's possible in a barbaric country, but certainly not in a European one! It's not double or triple punishment; the psyche of Europeans of any nationality is completely twisted.
                  1. +1
                    25 November 2025 14: 11
                    I don't have an answer to your question!
                    Probably it is necessary to ask those who belong to
                    trying to portray Czechoslovakians as cuties, literally forced to revolt...
  2. +4
    23 November 2025 04: 37
    Thank you, Valery!

    Kappel is an interesting figure.

    Regarding the turmoil of the Civil War: after its end and until relatively recently, in the Far East one could encounter quite a few people who served under Kappel.
  3. +8
    23 November 2025 05: 42
    Dear Valery! Excellent material!!!
  4. +1
    23 November 2025 06: 10
    In principle, the Czechoslovaks and other foreign formations had done their job - they fought for the Emperor with dedication, respected the Provisional Government and obeyed it, but the Bolsheviks were nothing to them and they owed nothing to the Soviet government.

    The Tsarist government had fairly good control over the Czechoslovaks and their armed forces; their numbers grew quite moderately, from a battalion in 1914 to two regiments and a brigade by the February Revolution. But then things exploded, and the provisional forces quickly organized, clothed, and armed a horde of 50,000 French nationals. The Armenian militias were a similar story: as long as they were battalion-level units (even though there were many of them) with a clear purpose and leadership, everything was fine; after the consolidation and change of power, political ambitions immediately arose. Things weren't so funny with the Latvian Riflemen either, just the opposite. The Poles had a brigade operating in Siberia (they withdrew their other units, and they also had a corps). The Serbs had a corps (mostly Croat prisoners led by Serbian officers).

    The problem of forming a new communist state from foreigners (and from ethnic minorities among Russian subjects, primarily Balts and Poles; Caucasians and Turkmens quickly went home) arose after the revolution, primarily for the Bolsheviks (and for civilians, whom the fighters against communism loved to plunder, if they were lucky). This is a secondary problem; the primary one is that the government, with its unwillingness to address the accumulating problems (the warning signs weren't even triggered by Pugachev's rebellion), led the country into a dead end, from which a way out became impossible without massive bloodletting.
    1. +2
      23 November 2025 10: 29
      From 1917 to 1922, the Red Army included approximately 370 international formations, including Latvian riflemen, Polish, Hungarian, Czechoslovak and other units, numbering more than 250,000 foreign citizens.
      https://leninism.su/revolution-and-civil-war/4142-krasnaya-gvardiya-na-zashhite-oktyabrya50.html?start=6
  5. +5
    23 November 2025 06: 59
    We'll talk a little about the fate of these treasures stolen from our country.

    Thanks for such interesting material! Incidentally, I remember the film "Chapayev" and the psychological attack by Kappel's men. We kids in the 50s later played Cossack robbers, and of course, Chapayev, Kochubey, Oleko Dundich, and other heroes of the Civil War.
    But now I'm more interested in the question: why has Russia always been robbed? From the Civil War to the present day!
    1. +2
      23 November 2025 08: 26
      The attack by Kapelev's men in the film "Chapayev" is a fictional creation of the screenwriters. Historians studying the combat history of Karel's units find no evidence that this insane attack ever took place.
      1. +4
        23 November 2025 08: 57
        That's what the article says - Chapaev and Kappel didn't cross paths.
        1. +2
          23 November 2025 09: 17
          Yes, it was said. But it wasn't specifically stated that the Kapelevites' attack was a fictional invention of the screenwriters. There's a difference between being stated specifically and being left to the reader to draw their own conclusions.
          1. +5
            23 November 2025 09: 23
            Let us immediately note that the troops of the Red Division Commander and Kappel operated in different directions and never clashed with each other.
            More specific?
      2. +2
        23 November 2025 09: 13
        Quote: Glock-17
        The attack of the Kapelevites in the film "Chapaev" is a fiction of the screenwriters.

        That's what the article says!
        But that was in the movie! And we, kids, weren't interested in historical truth back then! The main thing was that we mowed down the White Guards with machine guns! hi
        1. +3
          23 November 2025 09: 25
          Yes, I remember that scene. I always wondered how they could advance in such a tight formation toward a machine gun. But that's what movies are for—to entertain the viewer. I loved that movie as a kid. laughing
          1. -1
            24 November 2025 11: 56
            Quote: Glock-17
            Yes, I remember that scene. I always wondered how they could advance towards a machine gun in such a dense formation.

            Civilian. Marching chain: +50 morale, "Run!!!" debuff on the enemy. smile
            Seriously speaking, the average "Red" unit of that time, picked from the forest by the pine, would most likely have run away (or raised their hands, later enlisting in the "Whites"). And a machine gun wouldn't have helped.
            1. +2
              25 November 2025 09: 26
              Morale plays a role only in close-quarters combat, especially hand-to-hand combat. A machine gunner, however, can easily mow down ranks of attackers without much risk to his life. And full-length attackers are a gift, a "birthday gift for the heart." It's no wonder that the advent of machine guns led to predictions about the impossibility of war—how can one fight if one man can easily wipe out an entire company?
      3. 0
        26 November 2025 15: 47
        How to say: https://73online.ru/r/pervaya_psihicheskaya_ataka_kogda_nachnut_strelyat_idite_molcha_kak_shli-79834
        They write that there were quite a few such attacks (mostly in the Volunteer Army, in the South).
  6. +4
    23 November 2025 07: 31
    his descendants in Soviet Russia.
    I couldn't resist checking Wikipedia. My wife never left, living in the USSR. My son fought in the Great Patriotic War. My great-grandson graduated from the Perm Higher Command School...
    1. +3
      23 November 2025 07: 39
      I can't even remember which other White general didn't have anything bad said about him. Neither the Bolsheviks nor their fellow travelers made any accusations against him or called him names.
    2. +5
      23 November 2025 09: 51
      Quote: Gardamir
      My wife didn't go anywhere. She lived in the USSR.

      Arrested in 1937, sentenced in 1940 to 5 years as a “socially dangerous element.”
  7. +6
    23 November 2025 08: 04
    Quote: your vsr 66-67
    Why has Russia always been robbed?

    Because we... don't want to be lords, like the English. We're just too lazy. And it's disgusting to step on someone's neck. We're shy and friendly, we adore modesty and are ashamed to say, "Well, that's what I am, on my knees, you bastards!" And how can we obey such people? Recognize their moral superiority? But if they don't give a damn about it, then that means... they're not lords, and such people can and should be robbed. Look at how much they have!
  8. +5
    23 November 2025 08: 34
    Czechoslovak legionnaires in Samara, June 8, 1918


    The photo also shows a parade, but this time of Red Army units, October 8, 1918.
    Almost the same place.
    1. +3
      23 November 2025 08: 49
      Hello, Sergey!
      Does this street exist now?
      1. +4
        23 November 2025 09: 14
        Anton, hello!
        Yes, Kuibysheva Street, former Dvoryanskaya Street.
        1. +8
          23 November 2025 09: 35
          This is the place now
          1. +3
            23 November 2025 09: 54
            This is the place now
            good
            1. +7
              23 November 2025 10: 03
              151 Kuibyshev Street. KOMUCH was located there.
              1. +4
                23 November 2025 10: 13
                Someone wrote "Samara Group Headquarters" on the train car door.
      2. +13
        23 November 2025 10: 24
        Anton, have you seen this application? belay This is not a tachanka. smile
        1. +5
          23 November 2025 10: 59
          Anton, have you seen this application?
          I haven't seen it, but the solution is logical.
  9. +1
    23 November 2025 08: 56
    They say they wanted to cut out the episode of the psychological attack—it would have glorified the Whites. But Stalin interceded.
  10. +1
    23 November 2025 09: 18
    It's foolish for the author to lump everyone who disagrees with his conclusions into the liberal Fifth Column! And even in this notorious column, one would be hard-pressed to find any serious researchers of the History of the Fatherland. For the most part, they can be classified as educated.
    Besides this, such messages
    "found" or "known" do not work... If a document is found, a link to this document must be provided: where, where, and when, so that the document can be viewed.
    General Kappel was truly a military genius. In fact, he never lost a single battle.
    Despite the fact that they tried to belittle him and turn people against him
    Admiral Kolchak.
    Despite the fact that he took command of the army from KOMUCH, Kappel actually did not take it into account, seeing its incompetence.
    It's foolish to accuse Kappel of allegedly "stealing" the gold reserves! It was his rightful trophy. Or should he have left it to the enemy? Especially since Kappel didn't drink it away and spend it with ballerinas in restaurants, like Ignatiev, so beloved by Soviet historians. Instead, he donated it to Kolchak's government.
    And by the way, to those who start "drooling"... In 1945, Soviet units entered Harbin. The Red Army soldiers had visited Kappel's grave many times, but no one living within the church grounds at the time ever heard them make any comments. "Kappel—that's where he is," they'd scratch their heads and move on.
    (A.A. Fedorovich. General V.O. Kappel. Melbourne. 1967)
    Perhaps that is why in 55, by decision of the Soviet embassy, ​​the monument was demolished.
    1. +6
      23 November 2025 10: 01
      I wouldn't say Kappel disregarded KOMUCH. After the capture of Kazan, he insistently recommended the immediate capture of Nizhny Novgorod, which opened the road to Moscow. KOMUCH objected, and he obeyed as his subordinate was ordered. Precious time was lost, and Trotsky managed to restore order among the troops. The film "Trotsky" even features a scene of the decemation of the Red Army soldiers.
      1. -1
        23 November 2025 18: 07
        Kappel requested assistance from KOMUCH, specifically for Samara, knowing he lacked the strength to defend the city. The very fact of asking KOMUCH for anything greatly stressed him out, because everything he took, he didn't inform KOMUCH of, but instead funneled and distributed among its units.
        1. +1
          27 November 2025 00: 20
          Quote from Songwolf
          Kappel asked for help from KOMUCH, specifically for Samara, realizing that he did not have enough strength to defend the city.

          In my opinion, the Whites lost the civil war largely due to Kolchak's excessive ambition. He delayed sending troops from Siberia to the civil war front along the Volga until he had mobilized and formed units of an army personally loyal to him. Kolchak staged a coup and crushed the political forces that comprised the democratic wing of the Bolsheviks' opponents, and he ran afoul of the Bashkir nationalists, who eventually came to an agreement with the Bolsheviks and defected to their side. Stung by their defeats in the Volga region and near Perm, the Bolsheviks even declared reconciliation with the Socialist Revolutionaries. By treating the free peasantry of Siberia like farmhands in Tambov villages, Kolchak angered the entire population against him. As a result, as soon as the Red Army gained strength and was able to fight Kolchak's forces on equal terms, the rank and file defected to the Reds.
          1. -2
            27 November 2025 09: 32
            I don't think this was the reason for the Whites' defeat. It was more of a secondary factor.
            1. This is the absence of a political Leader and the absence of a single unifying force, as was the case with the Bolsheviks, who considered moral principles to be a relic.
            2. The fact that the White movement was led by military men, not politicians. They lacked experience and didn't know how to govern a state. A leader like Franco, for example.
            3. The desire to "ride into Moscow on a white horse" prevailed over reality. The decision itself was obvious after the capture of Tsaritsyn: to consolidate the southern defense line along the Tsaritsyn-Kyiv line and focus on strengthening the rear and implementing reforms, while Kolchak would follow the Ural line and cut off Siberia. A politician might have understood this, but not a general or an admiral. But the Whites had no such individuals.
            For example, take Vasily Aksyonov's "Island of Crimea," if we remove the satire. Or Dmitry Shidlovsky's two-volume novel "Enemies. Confrontation," if we consider it from the perspective of alternatives and application to our reality.
            5. If the Bolsheviks introduced terror into state policy, then no matter how much you slander the Whites, the White Terror was in many cases parochial. And depended more on the commanders who, for one reason or another, employed it.
            Let's take the attack on Chapaev's headquarters as an example. After all, it was precisely with the help of the population that this White operation, led by Colonel Borodin, was successful. This begs the question: why did the population of Lbischensk suddenly come to the aid of the Whites, if they were savage terrorists?
            One could further analyze the reasons for the Whites' defeat, but I think the Whites made the same mistake as the Reds. They needed to focus on the home front. The Reds were destroying Russia's foundations, while the Whites were putting off issues of rebuilding their country. Considering that the Reds had a cohesive political leadership with an Idea, while the Whites had a leadership disorganized by various parties, led by military men far removed from politics, the Whites' defeat was inevitable.
  11. -8
    23 November 2025 09: 34
    It was Kappel who, at the beginning of August 1917, seized in Kazan enormous valuables evacuated to this city from the storage facilities of Warsaw, Riga, Kyiv, Moscow and Petrograd – in fact, stolen our country has them.

    I took it back from the thieves, I remind the author of the Bolshevik government people have never chosen anywhere. Kappel-army of the legitimate power of Russia US. Bolshevik deputies of the US, by the way, are entirely spies and bandits (USSR court) - destroyed in 1937.

    Russia's gold, as well as the enormous wealth of citizens, banks, the Church, cash registers, palaces, estates, apartments, and houses of Russia, plundered by the Bolsheviks, were criminally and senselessly spent on payments to German masters, reparations to Estonia, Poland, and Latvia, and support for the revolution throughout Europe (most were simply plundered) - as a result, they were left naked, like church rats.

    doubts arise relevance Kappel himself, allegedly sending elite troops "to the slaughter"
    The question was addressed to the wrong person - they sent them away authors movie.

    But the truth is that in 1918, naked and barefoot Whites fought with their bare hands against the heavily armed Bolsheviks who had seized all the weapons and factories of the Russian army.

    The same Kolchak in March 1918 year ordered General Rozanov to destroy the rebellious villages "by
    what delirium.

    And the Red Terror is precisely the STATE terror against innocent citizens from 1917, the first execution ground of thousands - the Peter and Paul Fortress...
    And such firing ranges were scattered throughout Russia, where more than 700 "counterrevolutionaries" were shot in peacetime.
    Unfortunately, I chose the wrong one in advance doomed on defeat the side.
    belay How could it be wrong if the doomed Bolsheviks disappeared without a trace long ago, Kappel lies in the heart of Russia, but the Red commanders who fought against him were branded traitors and shot under an unknown bush?

    Many, probably, realized under the boots of the NKVD investigator that they had chosen the wrong side. And the worst thing is, they destroyed their families.What happened to mothers, wives, children, Tukhachevskys, Bluchers, etc.-no horror movie can compare...
    1. +4
      23 November 2025 10: 02
      Well, here we go again, Mr. Olgovich and Co.'s lamentations... And the people didn't even elect the US either. They elected not by the principle of "one man, one vote," but by the principle of "whose wallet is fatter"...
      1. -10
        23 November 2025 12: 38
        Quote: Grencer81
        And the people didn't elect the US either. They didn't vote on the principle of "one person, one vote," but on the principle of "whose wallet is fatter."

        Is it really that hard to just read before writing? the most democratic in the world elections to the US - equal, secret, universal, free?

        Under the "people's" government there were no elections (that shameful farce in the USSR was organized by cowards who knew they would never be elected)
        1. +3
          24 November 2025 04: 35
          The most democratic elections in the world, in the Ukrainian SSR? I haven't read such a funny joke in a long time... There have never been any equal, secret, universal, and free elections in the Ukrainian SSR.
          1. -2
            24 November 2025 08: 58
            Quote: Grencer81
            The most democratic elections in the world in the Ukrainian SSR? I haven't read such a funny joke in a long time... There have never been any equal, secret, universal, and free elections in the Ukrainian SSR.

            You robbed yourself of ignorance.
            The most democratic law on elections to the Constituent Assembly was adopted: Elections are universal, equal, and direct, and vote by secret ballot. The adopted law significantly outpaced the social development of electoral legislation in other countries.
            Quote: Grencer81
            No equal secret, general and free elections in

            There was no trace of it in the USSR.
    2. +7
      23 November 2025 10: 03
      Kappel lies in the heart of Russia,
      In Harbin? belay
      1. +6
        23 November 2025 10: 21
        Russia has many hearts.

        As for Harbin, I was there a few years ago.

        I remember the names on the stores. The letters are Russian, but the meaning is lost.

        Little will survive in a hundred years.
        1. -3
          23 November 2025 12: 52
          Quote from Korsar4
          Russia has many hearts.

          ancestors said so
          "
          Moscow is the heart and head of Holy Rus'!”
          .
          But it's getting close. in front of them
          Already white-stone Moscow,
          Like heat, golden crosses
          Ancient chapters are burning.


          Ah, brothers! how pleased I was
          When churches and bell towers
          Gardens, palace semicircle
          Suddenly opened up before me!


          How often in sorrowful separation
          In my wandering destiny,
          Moscow, I thought of you!
          Moscow ... how much in this sound
          For the heart of the Russian has merged!
          How much has responded in it!
          1. +2
            23 November 2025 13: 04
            Voloshin:

            But you loved your childhood -
            Through the forests of deep monasteries, log cabins,
            On the steppes of nomadic without roads,
            Free expanses and chains,
            Pretenders, thieves and cut them off,
            The nightingale's whistle and the prison


            Moscow's childhood can be seen in Pskov, Izborsk, Suzdal, Kologriv, and Totma.

            And the most important thing everywhere is people.
      2. +2
        23 November 2025 10: 26
        In Harbin?
        - Well, what can you do? Monsieur Olgovich regularly gets carried away... bully
      3. +4
        23 November 2025 12: 24
        Quote: 3x3zsave
        Kappel lies in the heart of Russia,
        In Harbin?

        :: Donskoy Monastery, Moscow, Russia hi
        1. +3
          23 November 2025 12: 38
          Yes, indeed. My fault. feel
          1. +1
            23 November 2025 12: 54
            Next to Denikin! The consequences of the shameful decommunization of Yeltsin and his successor, Putin, who, under the guise of patriotic speeches, pursued the previous policy in the interests of the Yeltsin family. And only now has he realized that he was surrounded by enemies of Russia with whom he would not win the Central Military District. So, we'll retire him in 2030—and then we'll start cleaning out the Augean stables, all those Yeltsin Centers, monuments to Judas Solzhenitsyn, and other filth. And we won't even ask permission from those pesky Moldovan monarchist trolls.
            1. +4
              23 November 2025 17: 50
              That's precisely why Wrangel's family refused to rebury the "Black Baron" in Moscow. The civil war hasn't ended, and social unrest continues. Only those who cherish the "good old days" somehow think they'll be receiving party rations instead of wielding a pickaxe in Kolyma.
              1. +5
                24 November 2025 06: 12
                Only those who dream of the "crunch of a French roll" for some reason think that it will not be they who will be flogged in the stables on the orders of the master, as was done before with his ancestors.
              2. +4
                24 November 2025 06: 16
                The civil war did not end only because some people really dream of becoming princes from the mud.
                1. -1
                  24 November 2025 07: 32
                  You made me laugh. You found the scapegoats. Now tell me that all the troubles are their fault. laughing
                  1. +3
                    24 November 2025 08: 40
                    What "woes" exactly? Many have risen from rags to riches, and many dream of doing so. Dreaming of sitting in a rocking chair with a pipe in their teeth, listening to their orders as they beat those who have done wrong with the reins. And the servant girls are preparing the bathhouse...
                    1. 0
                      24 November 2025 09: 04
                      Alas, the project to build a classless society has failed. Seventy years of Soviet rule have shown that human nature cannot be prevented from living beautifully. And problems of social injustice exist in every society. No one has yet come up with a recipe for universal happiness.
            2. +7
              23 November 2025 19: 10
              We'll see him off into retirement in 2030, and we'll start cleaning out the Augean stables.

              Have you already decided on the *heir*? Oh, I wish I had your optimism, but I remember very well that EBN approached this issue very carefully at the time. laughing So I wouldn't really count on...a successor. bully They won't leave an unreliable person in charge of the *household*, rest assured of that, and at the *elections* they will count as they should count.
              1. +2
                25 November 2025 10: 06
                Have you already decided on the *heir*?
                I remember that EBN approached this issue very carefully.

                Putin will undoubtedly install "his man." But there's hope he'll be smart, feigning "loyalty" at first, and then telling the aging pensioner straight out: "If you sit quietly on your ass, you're a witness; if you're "incomprehensible," you're an accomplice." And you'll have to answer unpleasant questions about that same thief and con man Chubais, whom you kept in positions of responsibility until he fled abroad.
                1. +2
                  25 November 2025 10: 19
                  But there is hope that he will turn out to be smart, will pretend to be "loyal" at first, and then will tell the elderly pensioner directly: if you sit quietly on your butt, you will be a witness; if you are "incomprehensible", you will be an accomplice.
                  An extremely unlikely scenario; there are simply no such people in the current president's inner circle, especially if we're talking about a successor. Personal and unconditional loyalty is paramount; absolutely EVERYTHING is forgiven for it, now and forever. No, I'm sorry, but I simply don't believe in such a scenario. hi
                  1. 0
                    25 November 2025 10: 43
                    Well, Stalin also considered Khrushchev a loyal supporter. And Khrushchev considered Brezhnev a loyal supporter.
                    1. +2
                      25 November 2025 10: 56
                      Well, Stalin also considered Khrushchev a loyal supporter. And Khrushchev considered Brezhnev a loyal supporter.
                      Supporters, yes, successors? That's unlikely, very unlikely.
              2. -1
                25 November 2025 11: 58
                The most likely successor is Georgy Mikhailovich Romanov, the son of Maria Vladimirovna Romanova. A transition of power has been planned since the "Family" era, but the echoes of socialist times must be neutralized. A sordid peace on Trump's terms will greatly facilitate this development. A constitutional monarchy, with the removal of the President, resolves many of today's contradictions in Russia and will finally cement its colonial status in the global political order.
                1. +3
                  25 November 2025 12: 07
                  will finally consolidate its colonial status in the world political order.

                  God forbid! There are other words that are more appropriate and more meaningful, but you know, unpronounceable in society! am
                2. +3
                  25 November 2025 12: 41
                  Tsarevich Zhora Hohenzollern has no rights to the Russian throne.
                  1. -1
                    25 November 2025 13: 03
                    Greetings, Ivan!
                    That may be true, but who would get into legal subtleties when almost the whole of Russia is at stake!
                    The figure of George suits practically all players, both internal and external, on a material level.
                    Our precious nascent bourgeoisie will be happy to exchange the lands, factories, and other assets that have fallen into their laps for the coveted currency, fearless of their future. External enemies will be delighted to eliminate Russia from global politics and begin dividing up its wealth under the guise of concessions and leases. And the bureaucracy will find itself in the endless swamp of the new bureaucracy. Don't forget about the "dreams coming true" of our creative intelligentsia, forced to vegetate on foreign doors with the onset of the Second World War.
                    So there are a lot of "for" votes.
                    And who will go actively against it?
                    So, it all works out as I said. However, life is not just a scheme. So, we'll see!
                3. +1
                  25 November 2025 13: 35
                  You have some strange fantasies. Did Olgovich bite you by any chance?
                  1. 0
                    25 November 2025 13: 45
                    Olgovich is ill. Judging by his vocabulary, it's hopeless, but that's no reason to laugh.
                    And there's a minimum of fantasy here: we need to find a way out of the hopeless situation Russia finds itself in. And in a way that doesn't harm those who brought it to its current state.
                    The introduction of a Constitutional Monarchy solves all these problems. Naturally, everything will be formalized as a "popular expression of will." If the Russian Orthodox Church so desires, it will convene something akin to a Local Council, etc.
                    But I already wrote above: life is richer than any fantasy, so everything is still ahead.
      4. +5
        23 November 2025 15: 54
        On January 13, 2007, General Kappel's ashes were buried in the Donskoy Monastery cemetery.
        1. +5
          23 November 2025 16: 00
          The deceased's posthumous fate was turbulent. He was buried three times.
    3. +1
      23 November 2025 12: 47
      It was the Bolshevik government that was universally recognized as legal and legitimate. It was the government that owned the gold seized by Kappel on behalf of the unelected Komuch government (which came to power on Czech bayonets). The idea that the Bolsheviks sold off valuables for next to nothing is an anti-Soviet myth—at average world prices. Funds were needed for industrialization, without which the USSR would not have been able to defeat the Third Reich and without which Russia would not exist today. It's just that the dollar was a golden asset back then, but now it's been eaten away by inflation, which is why prices seem low.
      1. -1
        23 November 2025 13: 11
        Quote: vet
        It was the Bolshevik government that was universally recognized as legal and legitimate. It was the government that owned the gold seized by Kappel.

        You didn't attend school at all: in 1918, only the German-Austrian-Turkish-Bulgarian states recognized it. the occupiers-NO ONE recognized him, just like in Russia legal authorities
        Quote: vet
        Money was needed for industrialization

        You were the ones who started deindustrialization. And without you, industrialization was just as bad, but without the cannibalism.
        Quote: vet
        defeat the Third Reich

        Without you, it most likely wouldn't exist.
        1. -3
          24 November 2025 06: 19
          Well, it's a real mouthpiece for Bandera's anti-communism and anti-Sovietism...
          1. -3
            24 November 2025 09: 07
            Quote: Grencer81
            Bandera's mouthpiece

            The Banderites are the ones who handed over Odessa, Nikolaev, and other Russian cities to Ukraine. That is, the communists.
            1. +2
              24 November 2025 13: 49
              Hmm...It's time to invite some good specialists from a psychiatric hospital here...
              I wonder, is Afterknowledge already a science or not yet?
              1. -1
                24 November 2025 14: 23
                Quote: Grencer81
                It's time to invite good specialists from a psychiatric hospital.

                It didn't help you, but you still advise... It's not nice.
                Quote: Grencer81
                And is Afterknowledge a science or not yet?

                belay see - WHEN they gave it away
                1. +1
                  24 November 2025 19: 40
                  When they gave it away, your beloved Bandera was already crawling under the table. So, is Afterknowledge a science or what?
                  1. -3
                    24 November 2025 19: 46
                    Quote: Grencer81
                    When they gave it away, your beloved Bandera was walking under the table.

                    What's the difference? The betrayers are collaborators with Ukrainian nationalists and traitors to the Russian people. Ukrainian nationalists and BND members, as well as their collaborators.
                    1. +3
                      24 November 2025 19: 48
                      No, seriously, you need to go to the ward with Napoleon and the Prosecutor...N6....
                      1. -2
                        25 November 2025 09: 03
                        Quote: Grencer81
                        No, really, you need to go to the ward with Napoleon and the Prosecutor...N6.

                        Why do I need your company? belay
                      2. +1
                        25 November 2025 10: 42
                        No way, you are such a complete idiot that it is only your company.
                        And in general, your honor reminds me more and more of a planted OUN member from Kryzhopol.
                      3. -3
                        25 November 2025 11: 01
                        Quote: Grencer81
                        No, you're such a complete idiot that it's just your company.

                        Yeah, well, find out: even the most psychopathic people confidently consider healthy people to be sick.
                        Quote: Grencer81
                        And in general, your honor reminds me more and more of a planted OUN member from Kryzhopol.

                        elementary school sent you
    4. 0
      27 November 2025 00: 24
      Quote: Olgovich
      And such firing ranges were scattered throughout Russia, where more than 700 "counterrevolutionaries" were shot in peacetime.

      In the Urals region alone, the Whites executed approximately 50,000 people in six months. Extend this figure to all of Russia and three years of war, and the number of White victims would reach a million.
  12. +3
    23 November 2025 10: 27
    Respect to the author for a good article.......
  13. +3
    23 November 2025 10: 30
    But the career progressed. extremely slowly, and in the same year 1908 we see him as only a lieutenant.

    Why such a conclusion? A normal career for an army officer who received his first commission in 1903 and had not previously seen combat.
    According to the recollections of contemporaries, no one wanted to take responsibility at that time.

    A common story among the Whites, by the way. No one wanted to take responsibility. Take, for example, Edrikhin-Vandam, who is now being fussed over like a jackass.
    The captured Bolsheviks stood in groups: Red Army soldiers, workers, women – and against them – Czech soldiers with raised rifles... A volley rang out

    The White Terror is not a myth

    As always, it was the Czechs who did the shooting, but it was “white” terror.
    Apparently, Kappel was a very good general and a completely honest and decent man, who, Unfortunately, I chose the wrong one, a side doomed to defeat in advance.

    The author often reproaches the "whites" for going against the Soviet government and even seems to be perplexed, like, how is that possible?
    Let's figure out what really good What did Soviet power bring to Russia?
    Eradicated illiteracy. Industrialized. Won the war. And finally, launched a man into space. Those who wish can continue the list... In fact, today's Russia still stands on the Soviet foundation.
    But... which of the above is there at the start of the Civil War?
    Don't know? I'll tell you. The complete collapse of all state institutions. Rampant banditry. Extrajudicial executions and robberies under the guise of restoring social justice, which no one really fought. In Soviet films, the Red Guards were portrayed as conscientious workers forced to take up arms to defend themselves. But their contemporaries described them far less complimentarily. Remember Blok?
    A cigarette in the teeth, a crumpled cap, An ace of diamonds on the back!
    The ace of diamonds on the back, if anyone doesn't know, is a mark of repeat offenders in penal servitude.
    And of course, the "Brest Peace", perceived by the majority of officers as an absolute betrayal.
    In general, there is nothing strange in the fact that these people did not accept Soviet power and, taking up arms, began to fight.
    But when the USSR collapsed, the descendants of the fiery revolutionaries and the nearly 20 million members of the CPSU not only did not try to defend the ideals of their youth, but, on the contrary, rushed to rake in the people's wealth for themselves.
    Something like that.
    1. -4
      23 November 2025 13: 49
      Something like that.


      Everything is so, everything is so, more details about what happened from witnesses:

      Declaration of the Extraordinary Meeting of Authorized Factories and Plants of Petrograd. March 13, 1918 // Central State Archive of St. Petersburg. F. 3390, op. 1, d. 17, l. 56 rev.-57 rev. Original.
      ..But in reality the most important issues of state life are decided in addition
      Soviets; the Central Executive Committee does not meet at all or meets in order to
      silently approve of the steps taken by the people without him
      commissioners, councils that disagree with government policy,
      unceremoniously dispersed by armed force Petrograd workers have already done this more than once
      experienced shootings at their meetings and demonstrations.

      We were promised immediate peace., democratic peace concluded
      peoples over the heads of their governments. But in reality, we
      gave a shameful capitulation to the German imperialists.
      We have been given a peace that deals a severe blow to all workers.

      International and fatally striking the Russian workers' movement.
      We were given a peace that consolidated the disintegration of Russia and made it
      the extraction of foreign capital, a world that is destroying our industry
      and shamefully betraying the interests of all the peoples who trusted
      Russian Revolution. We were given a world in which we are not
      we even know the exact boundaries of our slavery,
      because it is Bolshevik
      the government, which had shouted so much against secret diplomacy, itself
      practices the worst kind of diplomatic secrecy and, already leaving
      Petrograd still does not report the full and exact text of all
      conditions of peace, arbitrarily disposing of the destinies of the people, the state,
      revolution.

      We were promised bread. But in reality, we were given unprecedented hunger.
      gave birth to a civil war
      , devastating the country and completely ruining it
      her economy. Under the guise of socialism, we were given the final
      the destruction of industry and the financial breakdown, we were given plunder
      national wealth and accumulated capital
      people
      with an insatiable appetite. We were given a kingdom of bribery and speculation,
      which have reached unheard-of proportions. We were confronted with horrors
      long-term unemployment, depriving us of any means of real
      fight against it. Trade unions are destroyed, factory
      the committees cannot protect us, the city council is dispersed,
      Cooperatives are being hindered.

      Us They promised freedom. But what do we see in reality? Where is freedom?
      speech, meetings, unions, press, peaceful demonstrations? Everything is trampled
      police heels,
      everything is crushed by an armed hand.
      On the anniversary of the revolution paid for with our blood, we again
      we see on ourselves the iron shackles of lawlessness
    2. +5
      24 November 2025 09: 05
      The Czechs executed, but it was "white" terror.

      Kazan is actually north of Samara, not east of it, where the Czechs were aiming. So who brought them to Kazan? What were they doing there? Didn't Kappel drag the Czechs there with him?
  14. +3
    23 November 2025 10: 47
    Alexander Lbov, a famous Ural revolutionary and expropriator, became the hero of A. Gaidar’s book “Life for Nothing (Lbovshchina)”.

    By the way, I read this. These "rebels" look more like bandits and robbers.
  15. -5
    23 November 2025 11: 29
    jewels of the imperial family
    fell into the hands of ignorant, stupid Russophobes in 1917:

    In order to finance the world revolution, the authorities began selling "trinkets of no significance" to Europe.

    By 1935, only 204 of the 773 Fabergé Easter eggs remained.

    Most often, jewelry was broken so the stones could be sold at a higher profit. Sometimes, they were sold wholesale. There's a well-known case of a European jeweler buying nearly 10 kg of jewelry, each of which he subsequently sold for several times the price. Because of this, only a fraction of the family heirlooms are visible anywhere. Most of them were either broken before being sold, or sold to those who will never appear in them anywhere.

    1. The large diamond tiara of Alexandra Feodorovna. It was created in the 1830s for the wife of Nicholas I, but it was another Alexandra Feodorovna who made it famous. She wore it at the opening of the First State Duma. Shaped like a kokoshnik (a headdress) with 113 pearls and dozens of diamonds, the tiara was sold at auction in the late 1920s.

    2. The Sapphire Diadem of Maria Feodorovna was created for the wife of Paul I. The piece was crafted in the classical style with diamonds and five large sapphires, one of which weighed 70 carats. The piece was also sold for scrap.

    3. The "Ears of Wheat" diamond tiara was also created for Maria Feodorovna by Duval. Designed in the form of rye ears and laurel leaves, it reappeared in the 1980s as a replica, "Russian Field." The original, however, was lost forever after a Christie's auction in 1927.

    4. Alexandra Feodorovna's Emerald Tiara by Bolin. The crown jewel of this tiara, created in 1900, was a 23-carat Colombian emerald. The tiara's elements were removable. Again, by the 20s, traces of the tiara were lost.

    5. The Kehli Tiara. In 1894, a sapphire tiara was created for Alexandra Feodorovna. In addition to the tiara, there was a complete set. The entire set was sold at Christie's in the 1920s.

    6 The Roan Crown

    Etc.

    We must always remember that what has survived to this day is only small part of the enormous cultural wealth of Russia, centuries old, as of 1917, destroyed/sold/stolen by the insane new "authorities"
  16. +7
    23 November 2025 15: 37
    fought near Stavropol (now Tolyatti)

    "Tolyatti is essentially a new city.

    In 1953–1955, Stavropol-on-Volga was moved to a higher location, since the former city was flooded during the creation of the Kuibyshev Reservoir.
  17. 0
    23 November 2025 18: 46
    Quote: Olgovich
    jewels of the imperial family
    fell into the hands of ignorant, stupid Russophobes in 1917:

    In order to finance the world revolution, the authorities began selling "trinkets of no significance" to Europe.

    By 1935, only 204 of the 773 Fabergé Easter eggs remained.

    Most often, jewelry was broken so the stones could be sold at a higher profit. Sometimes, they were sold wholesale. There's a well-known case of a European jeweler buying nearly 10 kg of jewelry, each of which he subsequently sold for several times the price. Because of this, only a fraction of the family heirlooms are visible anywhere. Most of them were either broken before being sold, or sold to those who will never appear in them anywhere.

    1. The large diamond tiara of Alexandra Feodorovna. It was created in the 1830s for the wife of Nicholas I, but it was another Alexandra Feodorovna who made it famous. She wore it at the opening of the First State Duma. Shaped like a kokoshnik (a headdress) with 113 pearls and dozens of diamonds, the tiara was sold at auction in the late 1920s.

    2. The Sapphire Diadem of Maria Feodorovna was created for the wife of Paul I. The piece was crafted in the classical style with diamonds and five large sapphires, one of which weighed 70 carats. The piece was also sold for scrap.

    3. The "Ears of Wheat" diamond tiara was also created for Maria Feodorovna by Duval. Designed in the form of rye ears and laurel leaves, it reappeared in the 1980s as a replica, "Russian Field." The original, however, was lost forever after a Christie's auction in 1927.

    4. Alexandra Feodorovna's Emerald Tiara by Bolin. The crown jewel of this tiara, created in 1900, was a 23-carat Colombian emerald. The tiara's elements were removable. Again, by the 20s, traces of the tiara were lost.

    5. The Kehli Tiara. In 1894, a sapphire tiara was created for Alexandra Feodorovna. In addition to the tiara, there was a complete set. The entire set was sold at Christie's in the 1920s.

    6 The Roan Crown

    Etc.

    We must always remember that what has survived to this day is only small part of the enormous cultural wealth of Russia, centuries old, as of 1917, destroyed/sold/stolen by the insane new "authorities"


    You're educated. You don't base your opinion on whims, but on knowledge. So how and why do you let your emotions out instead of arguing with those who disagree with you?
    1. -2
      24 November 2025 09: 21
      Quote from Fangaro
      Why do you splash out your emotions?

      This is my opinion and assessment - Russophobes" - based on the actions they have committed
      Quote from Fangaro
      Kappel also went to pick it up

      oppression, he walked rid From the brutal dictatorship, collectivization, millions of corpses from hunger and cannibalism, millions of deaths of peasants and peoples, concentration camps, hundreds of thousands of executions in peacetime, lack of freedom. A worthy goal.

      And the Tukhachevskys fought for what they got.
    2. +2
      24 November 2025 09: 57
      Why do you splash out your emotions instead of arguing with those who disagree with you?

      Because he simply believes his opinion is the only correct one, and imagines himself to be an infallible "authority" who has the right to hand out "valuable" (and useless) instructions to the citizens of another country. It's delusions of grandeur.
  18. +2
    23 November 2025 19: 04
    This is how it happened that the majority of people unanimously consider Vrungel, Semyonov, Dutov, Denikin, Yudenich, Kolchak and other antiheroes of our country to be enemies, and Kappel is an enemy, but with honor and dignity.
    Napoleon didn't fight against the Russians either, but for "more land and less to pay." And Kleist, Mannerheim, Guderian, Dönitz... The enemy's good generals simply went to take what they were ordered.
    Kappel also went to take what he was ordered to. He may not have ordered the execution of all dissenters, but he was no peacemaker either.
  19. +5
    24 November 2025 09: 02
    Filled with indignation, I rushed to the Social Democratic Committee and demanded that a delegation be immediately sent to the military authorities to protest the extrajudicial executions. The committee members merely shrugged their shoulders in response.

    One could say it’s a typical story of a well-meaning intellectual: he wanted the best, but it turned out as always: first, someone else’s blood is shed in their name, then their own (in the case of Komuch, in Kolchak’s basement).
  20. +3
    24 November 2025 11: 48
    True, doubts arise about the adequacy of Kappel himself, who allegedly sends elite troops essentially “to the slaughter” – under machine gun fire.

    This is the Civil War. There, psychology was often more important than tactics—loose regiments and divisions scattered before cohesive battalions. And this worked both ways—in 20, on the Northern Front, a Red battalion routed and dispersed two White regiments.

    The main thing was not to make a mistake with the enemy - and not to attack an equally motivated and trained unit.
    1. +2
      24 November 2025 13: 05
      Having a loaded machine gun gives you a lot of confidence. Before you run, fire a burst and see what happens. And see how these "mental" and "motivated" ones fall just like everyone else.
      And then, according to the famous poem:
      "We have Maxim, they don't."
      1. -2
        24 November 2025 13: 47
        Quote: vet
        Having a loaded machine gun gives you a lot of confidence. Before you run, fire a burst and see what happens. And see how these "mental" and "motivated" ones fall just like everyone else.

        It didn't always help - the machine gunner also had to be motivated and trained.
        The first battle of the Combined Officers' Battalion. We are advancing near Gukovo station. Our company is running toward the station across the open steppe on icy ground. Captain Zgrivets is about ten paces behind his platoon, but as we approach the railway landings behind which the Bolsheviks are positioned, he unexpectedly finds himself ahead. From fifty paces away, he lunges at the Red Army machine gunner facing us, who continues firing, and suddenly somersaults into the snow. The machine gun's fire focuses on our small group. It feels like breathing hot air. We've become one with the earth. Suddenly, the machine gun falls silent. "Hold!" Zgrivets shouts, rushing forward again. Holding the rifle under his left arm, his hand gripping the barrel guard, he uses it like a battering ram, stabbing the Red Army machine gunner to death.
        © Yu. A. Reinhardt. Volunteer Army.
        In the same 1918, in the memoirs of Belykh, as if from a carbon copy, it goes:
        But if the red machine gunner/gunner's hand hadn't trembled, we would all have stayed there.
        1. +3
          25 November 2025 09: 18
          if the red machine gunner's hand hadn't trembled,

          What makes you think your hand shook? It jammed, or you ran out of ammo and needed to reload.
  21. -1
    24 November 2025 14: 33
    Apparently, Kappel bHe was a very good general and a completely honest and decent man who, unfortunately, chose the wrong side, which was doomed to defeat in advance..

    wrong??
    Did I understand your message correctly?...
    What about conscience? What about the oath?
    and much more...
    and the correct side is the one on top?
    Why then does our state help African and Asian countries by taking the "wrong side"?
    After all, only Vietnam and North Korea were able to win against the "right side"!
    the rest lost...
    M-yeeeessss...
  22. +2
    25 November 2025 04: 04
    Quote: Artem Savin
    ) led the country into a dead end, from which a way out became impossible without large-scale bloodletting.

    Well, why is it impossible? If the war hadn't dragged on and cost Russia so many victims and resources, there wouldn't have been any civil bloodletting. I don't recall any revolutions among the victors, and among the losers, it's commonplace.
    1. +4
      25 November 2025 09: 20
      Moreover, there had been a war with Japan before this, and the defeat in that war sparked a revolution. And everyone knew how defeat in another war would end. A smart person would have drawn the necessary conclusions. But Nicholas II was not one of them.
    2. +1
      25 November 2025 12: 46
      Quote: Buhach
      I don't remember any revolutions happening among the victors.

      VFR. The French intervened in the American War of Independence and took a big hit from the British.
      Six years later, "The Storming of the Bastille"
      1. +1
        27 November 2025 09: 54
        Hmm, the example isn't quite right, the scale isn't right, the action takes place in the middle of nowhere, and the time period is too long; after their defeat by the Prussians, the French didn't take long to express their views on the current government.
  23. 0
    25 November 2025 21: 34
    Quote: vet
    Moreover, there had been a war with Japan before this, and the defeat in that war sparked a revolution. And everyone knew how defeat in another war would end. A smart person would have drawn the necessary conclusions. But Nicholas II was not one of them.


    And if the war was successful. And another. And another... And then suddenly defeat. Then what? Negotiations? Strengthen the borders? Turn all the men-at-arms into ploughmen?
    He who has lost both his kingdom and his life is called foolish. And yet there were so many smart people around...
    Vladimir Ilyich was neither from the plough nor from the anvil in the forge.
    And the tsar could well have been removed from power while retaining his title. But in February, it wasn't the Bolsheviks, but the Socialist Revolutionaries and others who were vying for power like a bird, a fish, and a cow.
  24. 0
    2 December 2025 12: 51
    I don't understand the number of reviews about these enemies. They were destroyed, and good for that! What's there to sigh about? They were cannibals! Are our corrupt liberals trying to open another Overton window? Soon they'll start making excuses for the Nazis.