Three generations of famous Colts

6 254 24
Three generations of famous Colts
The Army Colt is on top, the Marine one is below, and below that is a miniature Colt Paterson.


Lubricate both Colts properly,
Winchester properly lubricate
And go on the road, because
A whim came into your head.
Let's go, okay, whatever!
And there, whether on horseback or on foot,
I swear to you by the bloody coyote -
We'll get to something after all!




Lyrics from the film "The Man from Boulevard des Capucines" (lyrics by Yu. Kim, music by G. Gladkov)


stories about weapons. It would seem that so much has been written about Colts that it's impossible to write anything new. However, if you think about it, it turns out there's still much to cover. In fact, these revolvers themselves can even be divided into three generations.

As is well known, Samuel Colt began producing his single-action revolvers based on his five-shot percussion cap revolver, the Paterson, in 1836. They were well received, especially by the Texas Rangers. In battles with the Comanches, the Indians would wait for the Rangers to fire their single-shot rifles and pistols before charging. Now, however, they found themselves under constant fire from the Rangers and… losing men, they fled. This revolver became the first generation of Colt revolvers!


The second generation of Colt revolvers from the 1851 and 1860 revolvers: the 1851 "Marine" type in stainless steel (top left) and with a blued finish (bottom left), and the 1860 Army revolvers and the 1862 "Marine" pocket revolvers (right) with a blued finish

However, Colt went bankrupt and closed his factory. He was asking too much for his revolvers. But ten years later, former Ranger Sam Walker traveled East to find Colt and convince him to resume production. It was then that the rather fragile five-shot Paterson was replaced by the six-shot .44 Walker revolver in 4 1/2 inches (1,25 cm) caliber. Colt didn't have his own factory, so Eli Whitney Jr. manufactured them in his factory. Colt soon acquired equipment and machine tools, founded his own factory, and then for years produced the Dragoon Revolver, Models 1, 2, and 3. All of them were essentially "horse pistols," meaning they were so large that they were best carried in pairs in holsters near the saddle, transferring their weight to the horse. However, a successful hit to the neck, their bullets easily decapitated a man!

Colt then took two different paths, producing pocket models of his revolvers and belt-carrying revolvers, or "belt pistols," as they were then called. The pocket pistols were five-shot .31-caliber revolvers and are better known today as the Baby Dragoon, the 1848 Wells Fargo, and the 1849 pocket pistol. Around the same time, Colt also released the first true belt-carrying revolver, the 1851 Marine .36. While the Thrawn revolvers weighed over 4 pounds (1,8 kg), the 1851 Marine weighed closer to 2,5 pounds (1,2 kg) and could be easily carried in a belt holster.

In 1860, Colt used the 1851 Marine as the base platform for a new .44 Army revolver. The Model 1851 had a longer cylinder, allowing it to chamber different cartridges. The 1860 Army also featured a longer, more comfortable grip and a streamlined barrel/lever assembly. Then, in 1861, Colt took a slight step back and used the same barrel and lever assembly to create the 1861 Marine in .36 caliber. While the 1851 Marine used an octagonal barrel like the 1860, the Model 1861 used a round barrel, which was cheaper to manufacture. It also required less metal and was lighter.

The last Colt percussion cap pistols appeared in 1862 in two models. The .36 caliber "Police Pocket" model had the same round barrel and loading lever as the 1860 and 1861 models, while the .36 caliber "Marine Pocket" returned to the octagonal barrel shape. These last pocket pistols used the .31-caliber pocket revolver frame, like the 1851 "Marine" revolver and the 1860 "Army" revolver. The cylinder chamber diameter was increased to accommodate .36 caliber round bullets. These pocket revolvers were the last in the line of Colt percussion revolvers, and their production ceased with the introduction of the legendary 1873 Army Single Action, which gave rise to the third generation of Colt revolvers.

Interestingly, cap-fire revolvers also returned to the market in their second generation, but it took almost 100 years, from 1872 to 1971. Meanwhile, the 1873 and 1876 revolvers were essentially produced continuously by Colt.


Second generation stainless steel Colts with everything needed for their operation

So, what's the situation with percussion cap Colts today? The following is known about the production of "modern Colts": story It all started with Val Forgette Jr. in 1959. He began collaborating with Aldo Uberti, resulting in the first replica of the 1851 Marine, sold through a new company called Marine Arms. Interest in it was particularly high because 1961 marked the 100th anniversary of the Civil War, and everything related to that event was arousing interest in the United States. Revolvers of that era, as well as, incidentally, Mitchell's book Gone with the Wind, were in great demand!

In the early 1970s, Forgette moved to Colt, which led to the revival of production of percussion-action six-shot revolvers at Colt as well. The first batch, known as the C-Series, was produced from 1971 to 1973. Marine Arms imported Uberti parts, tested and approved by Colt. The revolvers' parts were perfectly matched, and the revolvers themselves were painted Colt Royal Blue and hardened in a manner only Colt could provide. From 1973 to 1976, the company contracted with Lou Imperato of Iver Johnson to supply revolver parts. In 1976, Iver Johnson also supplied parts and assembled Colt six-shot revolvers. All of this took place under the supervision and direction of Colt. In particular, the company provided other manufacturers with a 120-page book detailing the manufacturing process of its revolvers. In 1977, the F-Series was launched, replacing the "Colt Royal Blue" color with "Colt Blue." Production of the second-generation revolvers continued until the early 1980s.


A stainless steel 1851 Marine revolver rests on beautiful carved saddlebags from an El Paso saddle shop.

In 1994, Imperato founded his own company, Colt's Black Powder Revolvers, beginning production of the third-generation revolvers, also known as the "Signature" series because they bear Samuel Colt's signature on the grips. From 1994 to 2002, the John Dovino Company, also owned by Imperato, assembled striker-fired revolvers at a Brooklyn factory. This same factory later became Henry & Co. Repeating Arms, now headed by Lou Imperato's son, Anthony.

All of these percussion revolvers of both generations are distinguished by their excellent build and finish, and Colt strictly ensures that they meet its standards. As a result, virtually every original model from the Colt percussion revolver era, from 1836 to 1862, was copied and put into production. Not only the standard models, but also commemorative models and stainless steel versions. The latter belonged to the second generation, and several models were planned for release; however, only three were manufactured, and only two of them were intended for mass consumption. Fewer than 500 Model 1851 stainless steel "Marine" revolvers and fewer than 2000 Model 1860 stainless steel "Army" revolvers were produced, and only eight Model 1861 "Marine" revolvers were produced.

In short, everything is being done for fans of vintage weapons "out there, in the West," so they can enjoy them to their heart's content and shoot them at shooting ranges. All this, in general, develops weapons culture and strengthens people's faith in the exceptional nature of their history and the quality of their equipment.
24 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -2
    30 November 2025 04: 32
    It would seem that so much has been written about Colts that it's impossible to write anything new about them. However, if you think about it, it turns out there are still topics to cover.

    I remembered something about hunting. laughing
    Oh, we found it! - But I told you Leva would find it.
    Semenov, do you understand what you have to do? - Of course.
    Well, Leva, well, detective!

    P.S. But I couldn't find the specific excerpt on YouTube. recourse
  2. -3
    30 November 2025 07: 16
    Well, I don't know why this old thing is needed. The PM with inlay also looks good, and I would have chosen the PM more effectively. I understand the advantage of revolvers is that they are always ready to fire, but there are cheaper products from Taurus and other manufacturers of modern revolvers. recourse
    1. +5
      30 November 2025 07: 44
      Fighting with a peacekeeper, thank you..., but having him on the wall in the weapons room - I'm personally for it.
      I once wanted to buy a Colt air rifle replica. I'd make a box for it with all the accessories and keep it on a shelf, shooting it occasionally in the wild. It didn't work out, and now it's not just expensive, it's incredibly expensive.
      But I'm not giving up on my dream. Someday, in another life...
      Have a nice day and interesting goals in this life!
      Thanks to Vyacheslav Olegovich for another article!!!
      1. +2
        30 November 2025 09: 38
        Quote: Kote pane Kohanka
        having it on the wall in the gun room is something I'm personally in favor of

        How true, however, especially when "occasionally shooting in nature"... aesthetically very "pleasant toys"

        Quote: Kote pane Kohanka
        Have a nice day and interesting goals in this life everyone.

        likewise to you and the most respected society!
        May "your" air gun find a place on your shelf someday :)
        1. 0
          30 November 2025 13: 11
          Thank you!
          I know the comment is very short.
      2. +3
        30 November 2025 10: 53
        Quote: Kote pane Kohanka
        and interesting goals in this life!

        Dreams Come True!
        1. 0
          30 November 2025 13: 12
          Thanks Vyacheslav Olegovich!
    2. -1
      30 November 2025 11: 49
      Bu eski şeye neden ihtiyaç duyulduğunu bilmiyorum. Gömme PM de güzel görünüyor ve daha mantıklı. Ben olsam PM'yi seçerdim. Tabancaların avantajının her zaman ateşe hazır olmaları olduğunu biliyorum. Taurus ve diğer modern tabanca üreticilerinin daha ucuz ürünleri de var.



      Hadi ama hava kurdu. Bu Colt tabancaların ne kadar dahiyane olduğunu unuttun mu yoksa.
  3. +4
    30 November 2025 09: 32
    He went bankrupt and closed his factory. He was asking too much for his revolvers.

    Of course, the strategy of doing as much as possible here and now is familiar, but one still needs to be able to bring a bankruptcy case to fruition without any adjustments and with real demand...
  4. +3
    30 November 2025 11: 15
    was replaced by a 4 1/2-inch (1,25 cm) caliber .44 Walker six-shot revolver.

    Inches and fractions are clearly not your strong point, Vyacheslav Olegovich! A .44 caliber is 2,54 cm multiplied by 0,44, which equals 1,12 cm. That's the diameter of a Colt Walker bullet. And the bore diameter of this revolver is 0,457 inches, or 1,16 cm.
    1. 0
      3 March 2026 13: 46
      Perhaps the original text meant 4½ lines, not 4½ inches.
  5. -1
    30 November 2025 11: 43
    Bu dahiyane silahların üstüne birde oyma eserler veya gravürler ile süslenince ortaya "Şerif'in baba yadigarı tabancası" ortaya çıkıyor. wink
  6. 0
    30 November 2025 12: 22
    However, Colt went bankrupt and closed his factory. He was asking too much for his revolvers.

    The high cost of revolvers wasn't the reason for the closure. New innovations don't always find their way quickly. Although Colt's revolvers performed well in the Florida War, the military was slow to adopt them because the weapons were complex and difficult for soldiers to master. Colt's revolvers failed to sell, and production ceased.
  7. -3
    30 November 2025 14: 28
    Quote: Nikname2025
    because the weapon was complex in design and difficult for soldiers to master.

    Compared to what—difficult to master? With all this burying, pumping, ramming, and pouring on the shelf? Or compared to saber strikes and spears? So, it takes a lifetime to learn this. Or what?
    1. -2
      30 November 2025 14: 57
      Quote: acetophenon
      Compared to what - difficult to master?

      +
      I also asked myself this question... there are no difficulties there, I attributed the refusal to the inertia of military procurement (everywhere and always) and, perhaps, even primarily, to the price... but it never occurred to him to optimize production in order to reduce it (which pays off with significant and guaranteed volumes of military purchases)
      1. -1
        30 November 2025 15: 23
        there are no difficulties there

        See my comment below. And remember that a soldier in the first half of the 19th century had a somewhat different level of technical knowledge and skills than one in the first half of the 21st century.
        1. -1
          30 November 2025 16: 20
          Quote: Nikname2025
          The soldier of the first half of the 19th century had a somewhat different volume of technical knowledge and skills than

          I looked... a very competent description, no objections from a technical point of view.

          That's not what I'm talking about... soldiering in itself is one continuous difficulty, and the "volume of technical knowledge" of a soldier in the 14th century was lower than his in the 15th, when he had to manage a bullet, wad, gunpowder, fuse and other difficulties, and this in any weather - hard labor, and only in comparison with a sword and halberd... but the ability to strike at 200-300 m quickly increased "technical literacy... I think (I'm sure) that having 5-6 shots in hand instead of one is no worse a teacher for increasing this very literacy
          1. -3
            30 November 2025 16: 46
            You know, I recommend that if you're truly interested in the topic, you read classic sources like "A History of the Colt Revolver and Other Arms" by Charles T. Haven and Frank A. Belden, or "A Study of the Colt Single Action Army Revolver" by Kopec and Moore. There you'll find answers to all your questions and a wealth of interesting information not found in articles like the VO website.
    2. +1
      30 November 2025 15: 06
      Compared to, for example, the flintlock pistol of 1836.
      Let's start with the fact that the Colt Paterson revolver in its original version had to be disassembled in order to load it, since it did not have a magazine loading lever.
      To load a revolver, the shooter had to:

      Cock the hammer to the half-cock position to release the cylinder for extraction.
      Press the barrel locking wedge until it stops.
      Remove the barrel, then the cylinder.
      Fill the individual chambers with gunpowder, leaving enough room for the bullets.
      Using a special lever or mandrel, load the bullets.
      Replace the barrel, cylinder, and wedge, and with the hammer cocked to the half-cock position, prime each fire tube using a Colt-designed primer tool.
      Don't you think that the whole procedure is a bit more complicated than "filling with air, filling with dust, and hammering"?
      In addition, the revolver was manufactured with minimal tolerances and was much more complex in design than previous flintlock and cap models, requiring qualified maintenance and repair.
      Finally, the first Colt Paterson models had a folding trigger. To release it, the hammer had to be cocked. During critical moments in combat, soldiers sometimes simply forgot about this.
      All of this has been written and rewritten, and anyone who is even slightly interested in the history of weapons knows it all, so your question really surprises me.
    3. +2
      30 November 2025 18: 13
      Quote: acetophenon
      Compared to what—difficult to master? With all this filling, pumping, ramming, and pouring on the shelf?

      Exactly. Because loading a Colt meant doing all this five or six times (depending on the number of chambers). And even with a standard rifle, ordinary soldiers managed to first press the bullet in place and then pour in the powder.
  8. 0
    30 November 2025 17: 18
    Remember that America is a country of collectors and legal gun owners. So, from a business perspective, producing modern replicas of Colt revolvers makes perfect sense.
  9. 0
    1 December 2025 21: 20
    The author exaggerates that much has been written about revolvers, and Colt revolvers in particular. At least in Russia. I won't even mention the USSR. The full history is simply unknown. Just the tip of the iceberg. And the author also makes many inaccuracies.
    1. Colt began with the mass production of pocket revolvers. This was in 1837. In 1836, he received a US patent, established a factory, and began producing revolver shotguns and rifles. Rifles were considered the primary weapon. In the same year, 1837, the Belt Revolver No. 2 and No. 3 were released. 2. The Paterson Revolver No. 5, which was used in Texas, didn't appear until 1838. The repeating weapon was well-liked, but its reliability was lacking. Its use required training. The quality of the steel was also poor: cylinders and barrels would explode.
    3. "Meanwhile, the 1873 and 1876 revolvers were actually produced by the Colt company without interruption."
    There was no model 1876 revolver. There was an 1877. That's how it is.
    1. -2
      1 December 2025 23: 19
      The author exaggerates that much has been written about revolvers, and Colt revolvers in particular.

      The author is not exaggerating at all. There is a ton of literature. In English. Take it and read it.
  10. -3
    2 December 2025 17: 21
    Quote: Nikname2025
    Cock the hammer to the half-cock position to release the cylinder for extraction.
    Press the barrel locking wedge until it stops.
    Remove the barrel, then the cylinder.

    Excuse me, how many seconds did it take you to disassemble and reassemble an AKM? Or do you think our ancestors were clumsy idiots?