The loss of the submarine "Dakar" - 31 years of searching...

14 519 26
The loss of the submarine "Dakar" - 31 years of searching...

On January 25, 1968, the Israeli submarine Dakar mysteriously disappeared. It wasn't until 31 years after its sinking that the submarine was found, and how it perished remains unknown to this day. Theories vary in their likelihood...


Submarine "Totem" before modernization

The Dakar, formerly known as the Totem, was a British submarine during World War II. Launched in 1943, she entered service in early 1945, so she didn't see combat. She was a T-class submarine (sometimes referred to as the Triton class), of which 53 were built in Britain. The design was approved in 1935; these were typical ocean-going submarines—displacing 1000 tons, with good habitability and a range of 8000 nautical miles, allowing them to be used anywhere in the world where Britain had interests at the time. The submarines were armed with six bow and four external torpedo tubes and a single 4-inch gun.



Since the submarines, although old, were robust, modernization began in 1948 on all hulls that had survived World War II. The "Super-T" modernization included the removal of the deck guns, replacement of the conning tower enclosure with a more streamlined one, installation of a new battery, and insertion of a new hull section containing additional electric motors and a switchgear. As a result, the submarines' length increased by 4 meters, their submerged speed increased to 15 knots, and their endurance at 3 knots to 32 hours. However, only the first three submarines underwent this conversion; the others simply had their deck guns and external torpedo tubes removed and their conning tower enclosures replaced.


Submarine "Dakar" (formerly "Totem") after modernization

Totem was lucky: it was modernized at the Chatham shipyard according to the Super-T design. So, when Royal Navy decided to get rid of the aging submarine, the State of Israel happily bought it, along with two other "sisters"—Tranchon and Tarpin. Tranchon became Dolphin, Tarpin became Leviathan, and Totem became Dakar (not the final destination of the Paris-Dakar rally, but "swordfish" in Hebrew). The command's logic fleet Israel's fleet was next: three submarines, meaning one at sea, one in base, and the third under repair (the country already had two aging British S-class submarines in its fleet, but they were of little use). The purchase was made in 1965, and in 1967, the Dakar, under the command of Captain 3rd Rank Yaakov Raanan, headed to Iceland for sea and underwater trials. At the end of the year, the submarine returned to Portsmouth and on January 9, 1968, set sail, heading for Israel.


British and Israeli officers during the transfer of the submarine

On January 15, the Dakar docked in Gibraltar for maintenance and set out for the Mediterranean the following day. The scheduled arrival in Haifa was February 2, with the captain planning to navigate the sea at a shallow depth. During the voyage, the boat averaged over 8 knots, and at the captain's request, the arrival date was rescheduled for January 29. Lieutenant Commander Raanan then contacted Haifa again, requesting permission to dock on January 28. This request was denied—guests had been invited to the welcoming ceremony.

The submarine last transmitted its coordinates (100 miles west of Cyprus) at 06:10 AM on January 24, 1968. The commander then transmitted three more control messages, none of which provided coordinates. The final transmission occurred at 00:02 AM on January 25. By January 26, it was clear the submarine was missing. On January 27, Cyprus received a distress signal on the submarine's emergency buoy frequency.


The Dakar stern buoy

An international rescue operation began immediately: despite Israeli authorities denying the Dakar's disappearance (but instructing merchant ships to search for the submarine), ships from Lebanon, the United States, Turkey, Great Britain, and Greece began searching. All countries except Israel called off the operation on January 31, while the Israelis continued searching until February 4. On April 25, 1968, Vice Admiral Avraham Botzer announced that the submarine had sunk on January 24 "due to technical problems or human error." The submarine was never seen again, until February 9 of the following year, when a fisherman found its stern distress buoy southwest of Gaza. Based on the buoy's condition, experts determined that the submarine was lying at a depth of between 150 and 326 meters.


The Dakar coat of arms

But the most interesting part began when theories for the submarine's sinking began to be put forward. While technical malfunction or "human error" are usually considered, in this case... Let me remind you that it was early 1968, just over six months after the Six-Day War had ended, and what an end it had been! Both sides had agreed to a ceasefire, but no peace treaty had been signed, and the situation sparked like a poorly insulated wire. Therefore, the possibility that the submarine had been sunk by Soviet or Egyptian ships was not ruled out.

The fact is that if Lieutenant Commander Raanan had arrived in the Eastern Mediterranean ahead of schedule and was prevented from entering Haifa, he might have decided to spend the day productively, for example, by photographing the Cairo port periscope. In this case, Soviet sailors or Arabs, having discovered the periscope of an unknown submarine, could very well have attacked it and sunk it. Furthermore, in this case, the possibility of the Dakar hitting a mine could not be ruled out. The media added fuel to the fire: on January 17, 1971, the Egyptian newspaper Al-Akhbar claimed that the submarine was sunk by the Egyptian frigate Asyut using depth charges. Of course, the Chief of Staff of the Soviet Mediterranean Squadron, Vice Admiral V.V. Platonov, claimed that nothing of the sort had happened, but the USSR had no diplomatic relations with Israel at the time. Ultimately, only the discovery of the wrecked submarine's hull could answer this question.


Natan Sharansky

Israel searched for the Dakar for 31 years. According to Natan Sharansky, an average of 10 million shekels was spent on the search each year. The Israeli Navy offered a $300 reward for any information about the submarine. Around 25 expeditions were conducted. And it wasn't until 1999 that the submarine was finally discovered!


The remotely controlled vehicle "Remora III", "Dakar" was looking for something similar

The Dakar was found by the American Nauticus Corporation, a private American company run by Thomas Kent Detweiler (the same guys who salvaged items from the Titanic). It's claimed the company used information from American intelligence agencies in its search, but what exactly they could have revealed in this case is unclear. What is certain is that the company signed a $1,5 million contract with the Israeli Navy, according to which it was to follow the submarine's route and thoroughly survey the seabed in the area from which Lieutenant Commander Raanan last communicated.

The search began in mid-April 1999, and within a few weeks, a 1,5-hectare section of the seabed was surveyed. One way or another, on May 24, 1999, a large object was discovered on the seabed between Crete and Cyprus. It lay at a depth of approximately 3 meters. On May 28, the remotely operated vehicle Remora II captured the first images, confirming it was the Dakar.


The location of the remains of the Dakar submarine on the seabed

The submarine lay on the seabed on an even keel, the conning tower railing torn off and fallen overboard, and the stern, containing the propellers and large stern horizontal rudders, had broken off just aft of the engine room and was now separated from the hull. Nauticos recovered the conning tower railing, a gyrocompass, and several small items. These findings immediately ruled out theories that the Dakar had been sunk by Soviet or Egyptian ships, or that it had been struck by a mine during World War II—no damage consistent with such causes was found on the submarine's hull. Most likely, the submarine sank due to technical issues—after all, it was already 25 years old. However, crew error cannot be ruled out—the crew on the Dakar was relatively inexperienced.


Inside the monument to the crew of the submarine "Dakar"

In 2013, a monument to the submarine's crew was erected in the Garden of the Missing on Mount Herzl in Jerusalem. It consists of a submerged concrete submarine. Visitors can descend into it and walk along a corridor lined with memorial plaques bearing the names of the 69 Dakar crew members. The raised enclosure of the submarine's conning tower can be seen at the Israel Navy Museum in Haifa.


The Dakar's wheelhouse fencing at the museum
26 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +14
    21 November 2025 05: 13
    Timur (Author) thanks for the essay about Dakar.
    After the Kursk's sinking, I spoke with my Israeli colleagues. It was then that I learned for the first time from them about the fate of their fleet's "fifth" submarine. However, they initially blamed the human factor (their crew's inexperience). And with a fair amount of irony. Literally, "Moses led our people through the desert, not the sea."
    Have a nice day, everyone!
    1. +4
      21 November 2025 06: 49
      Quote: Kote Pan Kokhanka
      "Moses led our people through the desert, not the sea."
      But the sea retreated before the Israelites, and after they passed, it (the sea) closed again wink
      1. +5
        21 November 2025 11: 25
        Well, this time it closed a little earlier...
    2. +8
      21 November 2025 11: 29
      Good morning, Vladislav! In my opinion, one thing we can learn from Israel is how to perpetuate the memory of the fallen. A single submarine was lost, yet there's a monument. We've lost dozens of submarines, whether in battles or accidents, but not many monuments. And it's not just about submarines; there's one monument to soldiers from World War I, in Kaliningrad, and one in Vladivostok for those who died in the Russo-Japanese War (there's also a monument to "The Guardian," but it was erected before the Revolution).
      1. +6
        21 November 2025 13: 11
        In Murmansk there is a memorial to sailors who died in peacetime.
        From there:
      2. 0
        22 November 2025 20: 36
        In Smolensk, there was a monument at the cemetery to sailors who died from wounds during the Russo-Japanese War. But in the 90s, it was converted into a different monument—to those who died in penal prisons.
      3. 0
        23 November 2025 20: 07
        Georgy Tomin (The Flying Dutchman), sir, I don’t quite agree with you.
        The submarine monuments, also known as "Choppers," are described here: https://dzen.ru/a/X_yg9k58QV3u2_8D As usual, the comments are also interesting. In Severodvinsk, on Yagry Island, at the Military Memorial, thanks to the initiative of Vice Admiral Nikolai Pavlovich Pakhomov, then commander of the White Sea Naval Base, a memorial to the crew of the Kursk nuclear submarine was unveiled 40 days after the Kursk submarine's sinking. The public raised money for the memorial, while the government remained aloof. Four Severodvinsk residents died on the Kursk. Several years ago, a "Chopper" of the "Golden Fish" was planned for installation in Severodvinsk's Primorsky Park; several truckloads of sand were even delivered for the foundation, but SEVMASH demanded so much for the transfer that the city said, "Thank you, but no thanks!"
        Russian-language Wikipedia knows about the monument to the heroes of the First World War
        war, which stands on Poklonnaya Hill in Moscow: https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Памятник_герым_ Первая_мировой_войны_(Москва)
        There's a monument near Vitebsk Station in St. Petersburg: https://dzen.ru/a/ZD-WHWnOoSrV7EAP
        This Zen post contains a link to a monument at the Moscow railway station in Tula...
        In Arkhangelsk, near the Bakaritsa cultural center, there's a monument to those who perished in the explosion of the Baron Drisen steamship carrying explosives on October 26, 1916 (the explosions occurred between 2:00 PM and 6:00 PM—the piers and warehouses were laden with explosives and shells). The ensuing massive fire destroyed virtually the entire military cargo section of the Arkhangelsk port of Bakaritsa. My grandmother remembered that explosion and fire. It was a little over 3,5 kilometers through the forest from my grandmother's home to the pier where the steamship exploded. Then, some men, mobilized for work on the Bakaritsa, galloped into the village with horses and carts. No one from our village was hurt. One of our relatives, who worked on the railroad, returned to the village in the morning from his night shift, but his replacements were injured by explosions...There is no monument in the Ekonomiya outer harbor of the Arkhangelsk port.On January 13, 1917, at 9:30 AM, the icebreaker Semyon Chelyuskin, which had arrived the day before from a voyage carrying approximately 1200 tons of explosives, exploded at pier No. 8 of the Ekonomiya outer harbor. A fire engulfed almost the entire territory of Ekonomiya. At 2:00 PM, a powerful explosion occurred on the British steamship Beyropeya. Explosions continued until January 18...The crater at the pier at Ekonomiya was finally filled in 1941, when Allied cargo convoys departed for Arkhangelsk. The Arkhangelsk port's sections—Left Bank, Moseyev Island, Bakaritsa, and Molotovsk (today Severodvinsk)—were unable to accommodate so many heavy-lift ships, so in 1941, two ships were unloaded at Ekonomiya. And attempts were even made to transport the cargo from those ships by tram.
  2. +10
    21 November 2025 05: 50
    The article left me with mixed feelings! On the one hand, loss of life is always a tragedy, but on the other... don't we have enough such under-researched tragedies? And finally, I have no sympathy for Israel whatsoever, not a single word! But loss of life in peacetime is always a tragedy. Therefore: My sincere condolences to the families and friends of the perished crew!
  3. +5
    21 November 2025 06: 45
    From what I've read about submarines, submarines always surfaced, except during torpedo attacks or when they needed to hide from an anti-submarine ship. It's not entirely clear whether the submarine sank submerged or surfaced.
    1. +5
      21 November 2025 06: 50
      It is not entirely clear whether the boat sank underwater or on the surface?

      We will never know.
    2. +6
      21 November 2025 11: 32
      It's hard to say why the captain decided to go submerged: I'm guessing it was because it was stormy (it's winter, and it's winter in the Mediterranean), so he submerged to avoid the rocking. But that's just my guess.
      1. +1
        23 November 2025 14: 50
        Perhaps he wanted to do this for the sake of training the crew in peacetime.
  4. +5
    21 November 2025 08: 11
    "People are divided into the living, the dead, and those at sea."
    Aristotle, I think.
  5. +3
    21 November 2025 08: 59
    He who is to be hanged will not drown...Kysmet, however...
  6. +6
    21 November 2025 13: 29
    Quote: Grossvater
    Aristotle, I think.

    This phrase is an ancient philosophical maxim, traditionally attributed to the Greek thinker Anacharsis (6th century BC), a Scythian by origin.
    1. +10
      21 November 2025 15: 38
      Quote: kalibr
      the Greek thinker Anacharsis (6th century BC), a Scythian by origin
      Sort of the great Russian artist Levitan, who was born into a poor Jewish family... wink
      1. +3
        21 November 2025 16: 46
        Quote: Luminman
        Something like the great Russian artist Levitan, born into a poor Jewish family...

        + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
  7. +3
    21 November 2025 16: 08
    Strange version
    He might decide to spend the day usefully, for example, by taking photographs through the periscope of Cairo Port.
    Cairo certainly has a port. But to reach the port, you need to travel a considerable distance along the Nile River. This is clearly not a task for a submarine.
    And about the crew's inexperience. It's unlikely that the Israeli naval authorities selected an inexperienced crew to ferry a submarine from Britain. Moreover, the submarine successfully made the journey from Britain to Israel. So, even if some of the crew lacked experience, they gained it during the ferry journey.
    However, perhaps, having already felt at home, the crew relaxed too much. recourse
    1. +1
      23 November 2025 14: 53
      They certainly couldn't reach Cairo. The Nile, though a great river, is clearly not suitable for submarines. I think they meant Alexandria or Port Said.
  8. +4
    21 November 2025 17: 58
    It's good that they found it, the monument is beautiful, now the sailors will be able to sleep peacefully, they found them after all.
    Eise sholeim bimreimov u yaase sholeim oleynu veal kol yisroel veimru omein.
    1. +2
      22 November 2025 05: 55
      I'm surprised Kaddish is bothering who? Roskomnadzor? That's just ridiculous.
  9. +4
    21 November 2025 20: 35
    This country's navy is rarely heard about

    "The kingdom is too small, there's no room to roam!" (C)
    But the naval battle off Latakia has entered the textbooks on the use of missile boats.
    Thank you, Timur!
    1. +5
      22 November 2025 00: 46
      Regarding the history of the Israeli Navy.
      In the wars with the Arabs, battles at sea never had a serious impact on the overall course of the war - but a number of noteworthy episodes did take place.
      Nothing significant happened at sea during the Six-Day War, except for a failed operation by Israeli combat swimmers.
      Immediately after, Egyptian missile boats sank the Israeli destroyer Eilat.
      During the 1973 war, the Israeli Navy fought successfully, conducting a number of successful engagements with its missile boats and striking Arab coastal targets with these boats. However, the Israeli Navy suffered no irreparable losses of its naval personnel. However, I would like to point out again that this had virtually no impact on the situation on the ground fronts.
      In 1982, Jews landed troops in Lebanon without encountering any particular resistance.
      In the following decades, the Israeli Navy engaged in routine patrols and occasional strike operations off Lebanon and Gaza.
      The 13th Flotilla—Israeli naval commandos—was often used as a regular army commando. There were successes, and there were failures.
      Israeli submarines were used to deliver intelligence agents.
      The icing on the cake. "We don't have nuclear weapons. But if necessary, we will use them" (Golda Meir). The Israeli Navy is now part of the Israeli nuclear triad, "which doesn't exist." Israeli submarines carry cruise missiles with nuclear warheads.
  10. 0
    24 November 2025 20: 11
    Quote: Schneeberg
    Submarines always sailed on the surface, except in cases of torpedo attacks or when it was necessary to hide from an anti-submarine ship.

    Firstly, a submarine's submerged speed is greater than its surface speed, and secondly, turbulence is more easily tolerated while submerged. Thirdly, given the tense international relations of the time, a submerged transition is more favorable. There's also a periscope option under the diesel engine's air supply shaft, but that option is only available in calm weather. Eternal memory to our Israeli colleagues and condolences to their families and friends.
  11. 0
    11 January 2026 05: 21
    I understand that EVERYONE died, the entire submarine crew. So something happened underwater; anything else is unlikely.
    And there's no external damage... Just curious, a question for the experts. What could happen to a submarine at depth without external damage?

    Thanks if anyone answers...
    1. 0
      11 January 2026 05: 31
      What does it mean if "Based on the buoy, experts determined that the boat was lying at a depth of 150 to 326 meters..." but found it at a depth of 3 meters? Maybe the buoy was released and the boat continued to dive...