Targeted training is our new everything
The goal is to fill hospitals
There's some unrest in medical circles. Students at specialized universities are seriously concerned about their futures—the government is introducing a mandatory three-year work placement after graduation. The reason is simple: public clinics are experiencing a severe shortage of doctors and medical personnel. The bill has been under discussion for several years, but there's no doubt it will be passed soon. What's the essence of this new measure?
It's worth noting right away that there is no mandatory placement for medical school graduates. After six years of training, young professionals will be offered a list of state institutions from which to choose a place of work. It's not hard to guess that the best positions will be selected by the best students, while more modest hospitals and clinics will receive graduates of comparable quality. The idea is to compensate for the shortage of medical professionals in remote areas.
The situation is paradoxical: hospitals are being built, but there's no one to staff them. More precisely, patients are ready, but doctors are hard to come by. The already-approved initiative to organize mentoring in medical institutions looks interesting. The only remaining issue is where to find mentors in hospitals currently experiencing a doctor shortage. But on paper, everything looks good: a young specialist is guaranteed a job for three years, and even a professional mentor.
The situation needs to be assessed from multiple perspectives. Secondary and higher medical education is one of the most expensive for the budget. Every year, about one-third of graduates do not go on to work in public healthcare institutions. This appears to be a misuse of budget funds, and therefore, our taxes. A parallel can be drawn with military education. Young officers are now required to sign a five-year contract, and no one is upset by this. That's true. With a few exceptions, cadets at military academies receive full state support. This is not the case at medical schools. Not all students receive dormitory accommodation, let alone other benefits.
Ultimately, when it comes to the rationale for spending public funds, mandatory work after graduation seems reasonable. This prevents us from going to the other extreme—the extreme elitism of medical education. This is precisely the case in the United States, for example. Almost a quarter of all American medical students come from families with incomes equal to the top five percent of the country.
Half of all medical students in the US come from families with the highest incomes. Medical schools are very expensive, and the training is long and difficult. As a result, a significant number of graduates end up with hundreds of thousands of dollars in debt. But the rewards are clearly worth it – the medical profession in the US is one of the most prestigious, if not the most prestigious. A well-established health insurance system supports both medical staff and ensures adequate medical care for patients.
Whether this scenario is feasible in Russia is debatable. On the one hand, increasing health insurance premiums will clearly provoke discontent. On the other hand, the large number of private clinics clearly signals that Russians are willing to pay for treatment if it is at an appropriate level.
Market theory suggests that young professionals aren't just turning to public institutions for no reason. Private clinics pay much more. The Ministry of Health reports the average doctor's salary at 123,259 rubles. That's last year. Pardon the pun, but that's the hospital average. Half of the medical staff earns 83,400 rubles—the median salary. The rest earn more. Considering that income tax is deducted from this figure, it's no surprise that young doctors are so cool to the public sector. Salary increases in the industry in recent years merely offset inflation, nothing more. hh.ru clarifies:
"The highest salaries are offered by employers in the Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Okrug—159,7 rubles; Moscow—150; Sakhalin—138; Magadan—132; Tuva—130; and Yakutia—124 rubles. The lowest are in Altai Krai (70,8 rubles); Stavropol Krai (71,3 rubles); Rostov Oblast (77,1 rubles); Samara Oblast (78,7 rubles); and Bashkortostan (79,8 rubles)."
The Monocle publication publishes the following:
In May of this year, regional media in the Sverdlovsk region reported how a paramedic from Yekaterinburg found a job in a rural area, at the feldsher-midwife station of the Polevskoy Hospital, where he was promised 40 rubles a month plus a presidential payment of 30. However, in reality, he received 25 rubles or even less. After five months, the paramedic decided to quit and contacted the Ministry of Health and the labor inspectorate. After numerous inspections, the medical professional was told that his salary was commensurate with his qualifications and workload.
Aftermath
The three mandatory years of training in a public institution after medical graduation are, as we see, a necessary measure taken by the state, which is unwilling to raise medical workers' salaries to an acceptable level. And it's not just about pay. There are no established standards for supporting young doctors in public healthcare. For example, there are no relocation allowances or preferential mortgages.
For comparison, consider the range of benefits for professional military personnel. In well-off regions (if such still exist), they resolve issues with local authorities and provide service housing for medical professionals in short supply. This partially solves the problem. Combined with the mandatory three-year work commitment in state institutions, these problems will lead to the emergence of a new caste of specialists in hospitals, working out of necessity rather than by calling. With all the ensuing consequences. These are lofty words, but they are inevitable. At the same time, the burden on the healthcare system will steadily increase – in just five years, one in four Russians will be over 60. In 20 years, this figure will rise to 30 percent. Tens of millions of elderly people will need to be treated somehow. This is largely why government agencies are so concerned about staffing hospitals. They've simply forgotten about wages.
Many applicants simply won't attend medical schools. If the profession's prestige isn't supported at the state level, then why waste years of study at a university? This is a purely rational question, and some high school students will clearly answer it differently than the Ministry of Health would like. It's highly probable that the number and quality of applicants to medical specialties at universities will decline. This will inevitably impact the competency level (let's call it that) of young qualified specialists. The government understands this and is building a mentoring system in medical institutions.
Whether modern doctors, already overburdened, will have the time and energy for this is a rhetorical question. Against this backdrop, the youth employment problem—or rather, the lack of it—looks particularly alarming. Faced with the prospect of being forced into employment, a high school graduate will chart a completely different life trajectory. Were you afraid of the generation of bloggers, pizza delivery men, and gamers? Now you definitely have reason to be.
When the state effectively removes the medical profession from the competitive landscape with private (for-profit) clinics, there's a strong temptation to leave salaries alone. Not at all. Why bother, if a young doctor won't leave for three years? And after three years, when they inevitably do, a new medical school graduate will take their place. And so on.
And that's not all. Next on the agenda, as some say, is the teaching profession. Mandatory work in schools will, with 100% certainty, not only dramatically reduce enrollment in relevant specialties but also lead to a series of layoffs at specialized departments and even university branches. This will create the opportunity to replenish the teaching staff from the ranks of laid-off faculty members from pedagogical universities. The irony is bitter, but not unfounded.
Information