Steam locomotives after 1829 in Europe and the USA

9 206 152
Steam locomotives after 1829 in Europe and the USA

He stands, he snores, he sighs heavily,
And the sweaty shirt was soaked with oil,
And it puffs out steam,
And he breathes heat...
The stoker walks by and seems not to hear,
He doesn't hear, he doesn't hear,
How hard he breathes!
And he throws coal into his huge belly,
And coal is heavy
There is a dull thump there,
And in the hot belly
It burns so brightly!
Phew, it's hot,
Puff, it's hot,
Ooh, hot, pooh, hot!


Julian Tuwim. Translated from Polish by Emma Moszkowska




History techniques. We continue our “steam locomotive history”, and today our story will be devoted to the era after 1829, that is, after “RocketStephenson won first prize in the British steam locomotive races. But what about steam locomotives in the United States? Here's how: before the arrival of British imported locomotives, several prototypes of their own steam locomotives were built and tested in the United States, including a miniature prototype by John Fitch. A striking example of a full-size steam locomotive was Colonel John Stephen's "steam car," which was demonstrated on the Hoboken, New Jersey, loop route in 1825.


A humorous steam locomotive monument stands in front of the Mineralnye Vody railway station. Photo by the author.

Many of the first locomotives used commercially on American railroads were imported from Britain, including first the Stourbridge Lion and then the John Bull. However, domestic locomotive production soon emerged. In 1830, the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad received the "Tom Thumb" locomotive, designed by Peter Cooper, which became the first American-built commercial locomotive to operate in America. Intended as a demonstration of steam traction's potential, rather than a revenue-generating locomotive, it nevertheless ran and entered service. The "DeWitt Clinton," built in 1831 for the Mohawk and Hudson Railroad, was one of the first locomotives of sufficient size.

As of 2021, the original John Bull was on display at the National Museum of American History in Washington, D.C. A replica is housed at the Railroad Museum of Pennsylvania. The first railway service outside the United Kingdom and North America opened in 1829 in France, where the Saint-Étienne-Lyon railway was built. Initially horse-drawn, it was converted to steam power in early 1831, using Seguin locomotives. The first steam locomotive to operate in Europe outside of France was named "The Elephant." On May 5, 1835, it pulled its first train in Belgium, on the line connecting Mechelen and Brussels.


German locomotive "Ernest August" manufactured by the Jägersdorf company (1846)

In Germany, the first working steam locomotive was designed by British locomotive pioneer John Blenkinsop. Built in June 1816 by Johann Friedrich Kriegar at the Royal Berlin Iron Foundry (Königliche Eisengießerei zu Berlin), the locomotive ran on a circular track on the factory grounds.

This was the first locomotive built on the European mainland, and it was also the first to haul a steam-powered passenger train. For a fee, curious spectators could ride in the carriages attached to it. It is depicted on the Royal Foundry's New Year's emblem, dated 1816. Another such locomotive was built in 1817. They were intended for use on the mine railways in Königshütte and Luisenthal on the Saar, but neither was ever restored to working order after being dismantled, transported, and reassembled.

On December 7, 1835, the Adler steam locomotive made its first run on the railway between Nuremberg and Fürth. It was the 118th locomotive produced by Robert Stephenson's locomotive factory, and it was patented and protected.


The first locomotive in Russia, 1834

In Russia, the first steam locomotive was built in 1834 by the Cherepanov brothers. However, due to a coal shortage in the region, it was replaced by horse traction after all the nearby forests were cleared. The first Tsarskoye Selo steam railway opened in 1837 using locomotives purchased from Robert Stephenson. In 1837, the first steam railway in Austria opened between Vienna-Floridsdorf and Deutsch-Wagram. Austria also boasts the oldest steam locomotive in the world that has never stopped: the GKB 671. Built in 1860, it is still used for special excursions.


Steam locomotive "Saxony" (1838)


Another steam locomotive named "Novelty" (1840)

In 1838, the third steam locomotive built in Germany was called "Saxonia" and was constructed by Maschinenbaufirma Übigau under the direction of Professor Johann Schubert. The first locomotive designed in Germany was "Beuth," built by August Borsig in 1841. The first locomotive produced by Henschel-Werke in Kassel was "Dragon," manufactured in 1848. The first steam locomotives to operate in Italy were "Bayard" and "Vesuvius," which ran on the Napoli-Portici line in the Kingdom of the Two Sicilies. The first railway line in Switzerland was the Strasbourg-Basel line, opened in 1844. Three years later, in 1847, the first entirely Swiss railway line was opened from Zurich to Baden.


Stephenson's Steam Locomotive, 1846


Crompton's Liverpool, 1848.

It's worth noting that the appearance of steam locomotives of this era was determined by their large drive wheels. While wheel diameters had previously rarely exceeded 1,5 meters, the Crompton company chose wheels of approximately 2,1–2,4 meters for its locomotives. This significantly larger wheel diameter increased the locomotives' speed. During test runs on England's Grand Junction Railway, covering a total of 3680 km, one of its locomotives reached speeds of up to 120 km/h (75 mph) unladen and 100 km/h (62 mph) with a lighter load. This was a feat no other locomotive of the time could achieve.

However, Crompton locomotives had one significant drawback: due to the specific axle arrangement, they had a low axle load. They could only pull light trains. Nevertheless, their power was sufficient to provide passenger service for extended periods. As typical locomotives for express trains, they found widespread use in a number of countries, including Germany. In Prussia, they remained in use until the mid-1880s.


American steam locomotive of the Baldwin company, 1834.

In the United States, the beginning of independent American locomotive manufacturing was marked by the founding of the Baldwin Company in Philadelphia, which soon became one of the most efficient in the world and began exporting its products on a large scale not only to Canada, Central and South America, but also to Europe. American locomotives had a number of distinctive features, undoubtedly determined by the needs of the national economy and geographical conditions. First and foremost, they had a specific type of conical chimney. This was necessary not so much to enhance traction as to prevent even a single spark from escaping. After all, trains ran through prairies full of dry grass, and the slightest spark could start a fire. The railroads also ran through... wheat fields. And there, the consequences of sparks emanating from locomotive chimneys would have been far more serious.


American steam locomotive 1859


Chicago and Western Railroad locomotive (1867)


What Wild West movie would be complete without a locomotive like this? "The Falcon's Trail" features a train carrying just such a locomotive being attacked by Indians. "The Steady Hand is the Indian's Friend" features a train being attacked by bandits—and these are just two of the most typical, one might say, examples. There are many more. And, of course, how can one not recall the third installment of "Back to the Future," where a Prairie locomotive accelerates Doc Brown's DeLorean to cross space-time... Of course, it wasn't the locomotive itself that exploded in that film, but merely its model!

Coke was used as a spark-free fuel at the time, but it was expensive because it was needed for the metallurgical industry. Where coal deposits were located near railways, however, coke was used. For example, with the construction of the Saxon-Bavarian Railway from Leipzig to Hof, coal from Zwickau was used for coking from 1842 onward (the coking plant of the Leipzig-Dresden Railway in Riesa ceased operation in 1845). However, despite the significant reduction in fuel costs achieved by this, the search for ways to use coal in its original form for heating locomotives continued.

Around 1855, changes in locomotive design allowed the burning of both hard coal and good lignite without coking. In other parts of Germany, depending on local conditions, wood and peat were also used to heat locomotives. Subsequently, many railways used coke, primarily for shunting operations at stations, to reduce the risk of fire and the inconvenience to passengers caused by flying sparks and smoke.


The German steam locomotive "Emont", with an American-style smokestack

As early as 1831, trains and, consequently, locomotives were divided into freight and passenger trains. Over the next few years, the general design features of the steam locomotive took shape: a driver's cab, lighting fixtures, and signal lights were added, the boiler became significantly longer, and steam distribution was improved. In 1832, the rotating bogie was introduced in the USA, and cylinders were horizontally positioned in 1834 (the Trevithick, Blenkinsop, Hadley, Blucher, and Locomotive locomotives had cylinders positioned vertically within the boiler, while the Rocket had cylinders positioned outside the boiler, but at an angle). In 1835, steam locomotives were equipped with whistles, and they were also equipped with sandboxes and steam-powered band brakes.


The Bademia steam locomotive with large driving wheels and a driver's cab

Record-breaking steam locomotives with driving wheels 2,5 meters in diameter or more reached speeds during this time: in 1839, the Hurricane reached 165 kilometers per hour, and in 1847, the Cornwall reached 187 kilometers per hour. In other words, in terms of speed, the machines of that time were practically equal to modern ones, although they were not yet capable of hauling trains carrying up to 60 heavy freight cars or tank cars.

To be continued ...
152 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +6
    15 November 2025 04: 18
    Why weren't steam turbines used on steam locomotives? After all, steam engines are terribly inefficient and difficult to operate. Steam turbines "came" to the navy in the late 19th century and remained there for a long time until the advent of gas turbines, but for some reason, steam turbines were absent from the railroads.
    1. +7
      15 November 2025 06: 29
      Quote: Puncher
      But for some reason there were no steam turbines on the railway.

      Expensive and complicated!
      1. +2
        15 November 2025 07: 03
        Quote: kalibr
        Expensive and complicated!

        I wouldn't say it's expensive, but there's nothing complicated about a steam turbine. In fact, it's easier to operate than a steam engine.
        1. +3
          15 November 2025 07: 48
          Quote: Puncher
          By the way, it is easier to operate than a steam engine.

          I don't know. But I know about the inertia of consciousness.
        2. +9
          15 November 2025 08: 56
          Quote: Puncher
          But there's nothing complicated about a steam turbine. It's actually easier to operate than a steam engine.
          Blades were a major headache for engineers of the time. They were made of non-ferrous metals, which changed their linear dimensions at high temperatures, seriously affecting turbine performance. Furthermore, the peripheral speed of a locomotive's wheels is much lower than the peripheral speed of a turbine, which inevitably required converting the difference in their rotations. This is both complex and expensive. And, as a minor detail, some kind of gearbox was necessary, since, as we know, a turbine cannot reverse rotation. And to solve these problems, the technological level of the time simply didn't allow for such a solution...
          1. +3
            15 November 2025 11: 05
            Quote: Luminman
            The blades were the main headache for the engineers of that time.

            You are confusing it with a gas turbine, where the temperatures on the blades are high, over 1000 degrees; superheated steam is only 400 degrees.
            Quote: Luminman
            will require a transformation of the difference of these rotations

            The presence of a gearbox is of course desirable for reverse.
            Quote: Luminman
            to solve these problems, the then level of technical development simply did not allow this to be done

            You think poorly of the engineers of the early 20th century.
            1. +4
              15 November 2025 14: 25
              Quote: Puncher
              Superheated steam is only 400 degrees.
              This is what steam does to the blades. Incidentally, the low-pressure blades at the phase transition points suffer the most.

              I haven't seen small steam turbines. Small ships have diesel engines.
              At one of our thermal power plants we have a ship turbine, it is significantly larger than a steam locomotive, and the boiler that produces steam for it is 18 meters high.
        3. +5
          15 November 2025 13: 46
          Operation is a complex issue. Water needs to be sourced from somewhere for the condenser, cooled for the closed-loop system, etc. There's a lot of auxiliary equipment involved compared to the cylinders.
    2. wku
      +8
      15 November 2025 08: 08
      It's very difficult to realize torque; you need to spin the turbine to the maximum torque speed and only then engage the transmission. This is very complex, expensive, and unreliable. A series circuit, a generator, and an electric motor are also possible. A navy doesn't require as much torque to spin the propeller as a steam locomotive and its train. I hope I've explained it clearly.
      1. +2
        15 November 2025 08: 22
        Quote: wku
        I hope I explained it clearly.

        Quite right, but after just reading about turbo locomotives (which, as it turns out, existed), this was actually cited as an advantage: starting without slipping. The difficulty of reversing was cited as a disadvantage, but that's still an excuse.
    3. +3
      15 November 2025 09: 26
      Turbo locomotives were designed and built at the beginning of the 20th century.
      1. +4
        15 November 2025 11: 09
        Quote: irontom
        Turbo locomotives were designed and built at the beginning of the 20th century.

        Yes, I found them. They were used, but for some reason very little. Although there were many advantages. Perhaps advances in diesel engines got in the way.
    4. +6
      15 November 2025 12: 31
      Turbines were used in steam locomotives as generators, for headlights, and so on. There were experiments. But! A steam engine, like an electric motor, has a working torque from standstill. And they don't need gearboxes. But a turbine spins fast. You need to understand the RPM.
    5. +8
      15 November 2025 13: 09
      Quote: Puncher
      Why weren't steam turbines used in steam locomotives?
      1. This product has a simple design and a very, very complex implementation. Even the slightest flaw in the design will cause it to collapse before it even reaches operating temperature, killing everyone in the area with flying debris.
      2. Let's say they've made a turbine—great work. What's next? They need to somehow transfer the rotation (the massive amount of energy) from the turbine to the wheels. This is very difficult. In the navy, this happened after the First World War: turbo-gear units appeared, which allowed the transition from vulnerable battlecruisers to high-speed battleships. On land, not in the military, this (with the transmission, not the turbine) was a problem until the 50s. Once these problems were resolved, diesel locomotives began to quickly replace steam locomotives. Just remember when the internal combustion engine appeared in cars and when it came to the railways. The steam engine, for all its shortcomings, had a very nice feature: it pulled well even at low rpm.
    6. +4
      15 November 2025 17: 58
      A turbine becomes more cost-effective than a piston engine after 10000 hp. The piston engine's torque curve is practically ideal for such applications—maximum torque is available when the engine is braked. This allows for moving a heavy train. There's no need for a complex transmission, gearbox, or other such equipment. A piston engine has very high mechanical efficiency; a turbine with similar values ​​would be quite large. And, most importantly, a steam locomotive as we know it is a relatively simple machine, both structurally and operationally. This is a crucial factor. This is why, in particular, double-expansion engines and other such gimmicks didn't catch on in steam locomotives. Converting a simple, single-cylinder, double-acting engine with a slide-valve steam distribution system to superheated steam proved more cost-effective than complicating the locomotive's design as a whole.
      1. 0
        15 November 2025 21: 50
        Quote: Astrologer
        That is why, in particular, double expansion machines and other tricks did not take root on steam locomotives.

        In the tables, pay attention to the series of steam locomotives that have low-pressure cylinders (first, steam enters the high-pressure cylinders, and then the low-pressure cylinders - that is, double expansion)
        The last photo shows steam locomotives 0-3-0 + 0-3-0 Θ
        1. 0
          16 November 2025 02: 03
          I don't deny that such things existed. They just weren't mass-produced.
          1. 0
            16 November 2025 08: 39
            Quote: Astrologer
            I don't deny that such things existed. They just weren't mass-produced.

            ??? Most of the freight locomotives produced had double expansion.
            I can’t say anything about passenger ones; I haven’t come across any detailed tables about them.
            1. 0
              17 November 2025 08: 33
              I have other information.
              1. 0
                17 November 2025 14: 32
                Quote: Astrologer
                I have other information.

                And what information do you have on the steam locomotives of the following series:

                0-4-0 "Od", "Ov", "Y", "Ych", "Yu",
                1-4-0 "C", "Sh", "Shch", "Shch", "Z", "X"
                0-5-0 "E", "Eu", "Em", "Er", "Ђ"
                0-3-0 + 0-3-0 "0", "0h", "0bw"
    7. +1
      16 November 2025 15: 07
      The turbine only produced significant power at high speeds. Reduction gears were required. This was fine for turning a ship's propeller. A steam locomotive, however, needed good thrust immediately, without the need for reduction gears.
    8. 0
      22 November 2025 16: 23
      There are two engines that deliver torque immediately and without any gearboxes: a steam engine and a DC electric motor.
    9. +1
      23 November 2025 20: 24
      1. Inefficiency. And the smaller the rotor size, the lower the efficiency. By the way, do you often see modern diesel locomotives with turbines? They're still diesels.
      2. Difficulty maintaining stable speed. The speed control range of a ship's propeller is much smaller, especially for a variable-pitch propeller. A steam locomotive would require complex gearboxes. Consequently, the advantage of a steam engine, which maintains torque over a wide range of wheel speeds, is negated. Furthermore, a turbine has a very high inertia.
      3. The extreme cost and low quality of rolling bearings in the 19th century (they were scarce even in the 1920s). A steam locomotive might practically not have them at all. In a turbine, they are essential, and their wear is quite significant, requiring a complex lubrication system, etc. This was completely unjustified on steam locomotives of the time.
  2. +12
    15 November 2025 06: 08
    Quote: Puncher
    Why weren't steam turbines used in steam locomotives?
    Turbine power plants, being compact, offer negligible thermodynamic efficiency, and the locomotive's architecture itself prevents them from being enlarged. This isn't true for ships, where there's ample space for any size power plant. However, by eliminating steam leaks and optimizing drive mechanisms, piston propulsion can also achieve quite acceptable efficiency.

    But this is the first time I’ve heard about using coke as fuel. Heating with coke is the same as heating with banknotes - expensive...
    1. +3
      15 November 2025 07: 02
      Quote: Luminman
      Turbine power plants, having small dimensions, provide insignificant thermodynamic efficiency, and the architecture of the steam locomotive itself does not allow increasing these dimensions

      I disagree. Below is a photo of a 400 kW steam turbine, 1916. At the time, that was the power of the steam engines on Type O locomotives. The turbine is frankly small; what's on the right is the boiler. Turbines are more efficient than steam engines, which is why they replaced them in the navy.
      1. +3
        15 November 2025 08: 17
        Quote: Puncher
        Below is a photo of a 400 kW steam turbine, 1916
        1. +4
          15 November 2025 08: 50
          Quote: Puncher
          Below is a photo of a 400 kW steam turbine, 1916
          A turbine like this would look fantastic on any locomotive... wink
          1. 0
            15 November 2025 11: 01
            Quote: Luminman
            A turbine like this would look fantastic on any locomotive.

            The turbine is on the left, and the steam boiler is on the right. This is a ship's installation, and that's why the boiler is shaped like this.
            1. +6
              15 November 2025 13: 01
              I doubt it!
              The one on the left is the electric generator, and the one on the right is the steam turbine. See the large-diameter flanges extending downwards? That's the steam exhaust from the first and second stages of the turbine to the condenser. The boiler isn't in the photo!
        2. wku
          +4
          15 November 2025 09: 43
          Additional equipment, a condenser, and other things take up much more space than the unit itself in your photo; it's like an iceberg, or rather its visible part.
          1. +2
            15 November 2025 11: 11
            Quote: wku
            Additional equipment, a condenser, and other things take up much more space than the unit itself.

            Oh, come on. It's no more than carrying a huge water tank around and refilling it at every stop.
            1. wku
              +5
              15 November 2025 11: 36
              I don't want to be too clever, but I could write you several pages of text explaining why a steam turbine is not an option for a steam locomotive of the 9th-20th centuries. In a modern version of a combined cycle gas turbine (when the exhaust gases of a gas turbine, through a waste heat boiler, turn a steam turbine, which can be on the same shaft as the gas turbine), it is possible, but the question is why, a very expensive design will result. The huge water tank is a separate story. A high-efficiency steam turbine requires high-temperature and high-pressure steam, which in turn requires specially prepared water, and a boiler, which differs in design from a steam locomotive. In general, I will not clog your brain with fragmentary information. If you are interested, you can find everything, all the information is available online.
          2. 0
            15 November 2025 18: 05
            If a steam locomotive is made with full condensation, then the condenser with the required surface (with reasonable design) will be larger than the outer surface of the locomotive itself.
        3. +1
          15 November 2025 20: 55
          The photo shows a turbo generator, on the left is a 400 kW generator, on the right is a turbine (not a Laval one, I think).
          https://museum.power-m.ru/plants/lmz/history/ehra-promyshlennogo-buma/
          caption
          "The turbine workshop of the Metal Plant. In the foreground is the assembly of a 400 kW turbine, manufactured by the Metal Plant for the Ust-Izhora Shipyard. 1916."

          Turbo locomotives (steam locomotives with turbines) see "Technical Encyclopedia / ed. L.K. Martens. Vol. 24" pp. 316..328
          https://rusneb.ru/catalog/000219_000011_RU_%D0%93%D0%9F%D0%9D%D0%A2%D0%91_%D0%A0%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%81%D0%B8%D0%B8_IBIS_0000650635/
      2. +5
        15 November 2025 08: 48
        Quote: Puncher
        The turbine has a higher efficiency than the steam engine, which is why they replaced them in the navy.
        Yes, I agree that turbine-type power plants are significantly more efficient than piston-type ones, but as turbine diameters decrease, the steam flow rate ratio also changes, leading to a decrease in the turbine blade tip speed. Consequently, small turbines cannot achieve the high efficiency values ​​typical of larger turbines. And the navy uses turbines because, unlike a steam locomotive, there's plenty of room on board. I'm not an expert in steam locomotive construction, but that's a valid point. absolutely true for all turbines - aviation, marine or electrical...
        1. +2
          15 November 2025 10: 59
          Quote: Luminman
          This statement is absolutely true for any turbines - aircraft, marine or electric...

          The internet says that steam turbine locomotives were poor shunters, but they were better over long distances, and they didn't damage the tracks like steam engines. Moreover, they lost virtually no water.
          To be honest, I still don't understand why vocational schools didn't catch on. There were many advantages.
          1. +4
            15 November 2025 13: 33
            Quote: Puncher
            The internet says that steam turbine locomotives were bad as shunters, but were better over long distances, ...
            To be honest, I still don't understand why vocational schools didn't catch on. There were many advantages.

            A turbine is good in a single, constant mode. When changing modes, efficiency and power drop sharply. Incidentally, this also applies to gas turbines, which is why the An-2, with its turboprop engine, had dramatically increased runway requirements. It's less dynamic and takes a long time to reach maximum power. Furthermore, a steam locomotive, unlike an airplane, requires a gearbox with a higher gear ratio, which is also expensive and heavy.

            And for the mid-19th century, the precision requirements for turbine components were excessive. Bearings, blades, the shaft itself—everything had micron-level tolerances. It was difficult to produce with a hammer or sledgehammer.
        2. 0
          23 November 2025 20: 35
          I'll add that for a propeller, thrust is proportional to the 4th power of its diameter (4th, Karl!). I suspect the same is true for turbine rotors.
      3. +3
        15 November 2025 09: 34
        Unfortunately, this is a fact, considering the turbine's size and low efficiency at high speeds, which necessitated a gearbox, which complicates the design. One option was to turbocharge electric locomotives, but diesel engines proved superior and more efficient.
        The history of turbine locomotives can be found in various sources, which also describe the pros and cons of these machines.
        Perhaps turbo-electric locomotives would have been widely used, but diesel turned out to be better.
      4. +2
        15 November 2025 12: 32
        Turbines replaced the PM in the navy. And traders used the PM for a long time.
    2. +3
      15 November 2025 13: 29
      They were fueled by coal. However, a number of English-language publications used "coke" to refer to high-calorific, low-ash coal, which could be used to make coke. The translation of "calcium carbonate" is how it found its way into our literature. This story began with a description of the trials of Stephenson's steam locomotive.
  3. +24
    15 November 2025 06: 39
    Thank you for the article!

    The locomotive is flying, smoke is billowing.
    There is snow under it, the sky above it.
    On the sides - only pine trees in a row,
    One after another they stand in the snow.
    1. +20
      15 November 2025 08: 06
      I don't know why, but I personally see a "soul" in steam locomotives. Modern diesel locomotives and electric trains don't evoke such feelings.
      Model of the Cherepanov steam locomotive and its descendants (Ekaterinburg).
      1. +9
        15 November 2025 08: 23
        Quote: Kote pane Kohanka
        but I personally see a "soul" in steam locomotives

        So your direct path to steampunk.
        1. +5
          15 November 2025 09: 10
          Quote: Puncher
          Quote: Kote pane Kohanka
          but I personally see a "soul" in steam locomotives

          So your direct path to steampunk.

          Good morning, Evgeny!
          Steampunk is interesting stuff; I've read it before. A lot depends on the author, though.
          There is no time to read now, absolutely none.
          1. +5
            15 November 2025 11: 06
            Quote: Kote pane Kohanka
            Steampunk is an interesting thing.

            In my opinion, the best things are the pictures...
      2. +10
        15 November 2025 08: 42
        Quote: Kote pane Kohanka
        I don’t know why, but I personally see a “soul” in steam locomotives.

        I personally completely agree with you... by the way, they "breathe"!.. But more seriously, when this colossus (a real "linear" steam locomotive) starts moving right in front of your eyes, it's a mesmerizing sight

        P.S. Besides, these are also monuments of technical thought, very beautiful in their grandeur and sophistication...
        I know about markers, no need to remind me :)
        1. +11
          15 November 2025 08: 58
          Quote: Rodez
          they "breathe" after all

          As a child, I had a very poor appetite, so my grandmother took me to Penza-1 station, where there was a restaurant right on the platform. There, they served me borscht (I never ate it at home!) and schnitzel with mashed potatoes and gravy in iron bowls. I'd sit there, stuffing my face and watching the steam trains fly past, showering the platform with white steam. For some reason, this only increased my appetite. Then we'd go to the toy kiosk, and I'd admire them. I managed to get a large hare stuffed with sawdust and a fox in a sarafan. They were my favorite toys...
          1. +8
            15 November 2025 09: 23
            Quote: kalibr
            I watched the steam locomotives flying past, showering the platform with white steam

            When I was a kid, I used to walk to my grandfather's house through the station and all the way across. There was a trolleybus to the station, but only one bus a day went to the "outside the station," so "never." Sometimes it would stop right next to me to "watch" how the steam locomotive took on water (there was a system of taps for this), sometimes dousing me with that very steam, just like some kind of "hedgehog in the fog" :)

            Quote: kalibr
            There was a restaurant on the platform. They served me borscht in iron bowls (I didn't eat it at home!)

            I wasn't completely without an appetite, but the "situation" was familiar - "in the cafeteria," no matter which one, everything seemed tastier and I ate more readily :)
            But for a long time now, it's been exactly the opposite: I prefer only "home-cooked" food, and only go to a canteen or restaurant "for food" out of desperation on business trips. "Special" occasions like special cuisine or a gathering of friends don't count :)

            Quote: kalibr
            We went to the toy kiosk and I admired them. I asked for a big stuffed bunny there.

            In Sochi in the late 60s, there was a toy store with live scenes: a pulsating fountain, a spinning carousel, a swing with a doll... You couldn't see anything like that in many places back then... I could stand there for hours, but my parents weren't exactly thrilled, so they'd let me "gaze" for a couple of minutes... And my favorite toy was a seal (stuffed with sawdust) with a spinning ball on its nose... The ball soon fell off, but the seal remained a favorite despite... :)
            1. +9
              15 November 2025 14: 20
              I begged for a large hare stuffed with sawdust and a fox in a sarafan. They were my favorite toys...

              Sorry, I couldn't resist. I'll tell you a semi-mystical story about my favorite childhood toy, which became our family talisman. When I was about six years old, for my birthday, my parents gave me a GDR crawler tractor with two separate electric motors for each track—each had its own lever in the cab, thanks to which it could go forward, backward, and turn. (Photos from the late 60s - 1 and 3) But the most charming thing about it was the rubber tractor driver figurine that you could play with separately and even wash with in the bathtub. I nicknamed him Vaska, and he became my favorite—you could put him anywhere—in cars, boats, on toy horses, shoot bullets at him, etc. When, at 11, I had to move from my parents to live with my grandparents near Pyatigorsk, I gave the tractor with Vaska to my classmate, a girl from our garrison. Vaska became her favorite childhood toy, and during her student years, a lucky charm during exams. In '86, she and I got married. And Vaska went with us to Turkmenistan. There, he became the first toy of our son, who was born in a godforsaken land.
              A son at the SAPO border outpost. Ten years later, his father passed it on to his daughter. Then to his son's daughter, who, at eighteen months old, managed to bite his head off while playing with him. Everyone was terribly upset, but they restored it—the head was glued back on, and his wife and daughter touched up the "damaged" part, which had faded over two decades, with acrylic paints. Now our veteran Vaska sits peacefully on a bookshelf (photo 2).
              1. +5
                15 November 2025 17: 28
                Quote: Richard
                My parents gave me a GDR crawler tractor

                I seem to remember your tractor... it was supposed to have cylinders that moved when moving... if so, I used to look at it in the toy department of the department store, especially when the next customer asked to see it in action, before "making up his mind"... I even dared to hint to everyone around me, regardless of the degree of kinship, but it never happened (it was expensive, at that time my father was no longer "at hand", and my mother "still" had a salary of 70 rubles)
                maybe that's why, by the way, life went down a different branch of the fork, without a talisman :)
                1. +5
                  15 November 2025 17: 35
                  Quote: Rodez
                  the cylinders had to move

                  Ugh, pistons in transparent cylinders
                2. +5
                  15 November 2025 17: 46
                  His cylinders were also supposed to move while moving.

                  Unfortunately, my dear Sergey, I don't remember that. Half a century has passed. But I seem to recall the cylinder compartment itself glowing. And the tractor came with a trailer and a bulldozer scoop. The tractor had incredible traction—it easily towed a heavy, five-shot, metal toy cannon firing plastic cartridges.
                  The gun, of course, hasn't survived; its photo is from the Internet.
                  1. +5
                    15 November 2025 17: 59
                    Quote: Richard
                    The cylinder compartment itself, I remember, seemed to glow

                    That's the one! He didn't mention the glow, I thought his memory was failing him...
                    A good gun! A little later, a tank appeared on the market that fired similar shells, but, of course, it also missed the mark... But I managed to "get hold of" a missile launcher on a wheeled chassis; it handled the tin soldiers and domino fortifications just fine :)

                    Half a century is a very respectable period, all the best to you, your family and your talisman!
                    1. +5
                      15 November 2025 18: 22
                      A little later, a tank appeared on sale that fired similar shells

                      A classmate at the village school had one like this. It had a long cord. It cost, if I'm not mistaken, 10 rubles 50 kopecks—a huge amount of money for kids from a collective farm. You can't save on school lunches with one like that. He also had a wonderful game called "Behind the Wheel." The kid was from a well-off family.
                      All the best to you, your family and your mascot!

                      Thank you, Sergey! I wish the same for you and all your loved ones! drinks
                      1. +4
                        15 November 2025 18: 33
                        Quote: Richard
                        A classmate of mine had one like this at school in the village. It had a long wired remote control.

                        That's exactly what I had in mind, "I remember it like it was yesterday"@, because a little later there was another tank with a wireless radio, but the tank itself was "not the same" and of little interest... I don't personally remember the price (as well as the tractor), but the fact that access was quite limited (not only for "collective farm workers", my mother was a doctor), that's for sure
              2. +5
                15 November 2025 20: 54
                Quote: Richard
                I gave the tractor with Vaska to my classmate

                A novel with a capital letter!
                1. +4
                  15 November 2025 22: 20
                  A novel with a capital letter!

                  Yes, Vyacheslav, it's strange even to me. My wife and I were born in the same year, in neighboring three-story garrison buildings. We lived in the same courtyard from childhood, both enrolled in the same kindergarten and the same school. We were in the same class, sat at the same desk until fifth grade, and were friends. After 1974, our paths diverged for a long time - my parents sent me to the village to live with my great-grandmother. She had a hard time working and looking after the house with two blind children on her own, without help. My father's parents were blind - my grandfather was a disabled veteran of WWII, and my grandmother had been blind since the age of four, following the terrible measles epidemic of 1925. To return to the point - Tatyana and I corresponded frequently at first, then began simply sending each other postcards for holidays, and eventually even this communication died out. We only met by chance thirteen years later. After graduating from the VPVPU, I stopped in Ivanovo from Golitsyno to visit my parents, and I ran into her at the garrison military store. We got to talking. She hadn't been in Ivanovo much in recent years either—she was studying at the Shuya Pedagogical Institute. Before graduating, she also stopped by to visit her parents. And so things began... Next year it will be forty years since we've been together. A son, a daughter, two grandchildren. Fate sometimes does strange and incomprehensible things to people. It's truly a novel.
                  1. +4
                    15 November 2025 22: 38
                    Although, if we put aside all the mysticism, it was a completely normal situation for that Soviet period: the overwhelming majority of my peers, cadets at the Military University, having received lieutenant's shoulder boards, left for their place of further service with their young wives.
              3. +3
                16 November 2025 14: 58
                Family keeper.
                ;)
      3. +11
        15 November 2025 09: 12
        do not evoke such feelings.

        Well, I don't know, Vlad, but the Tez 5524 is pretty cool in its own right! It's probably a hundred years old, but it looks great, really looks great! bully
        1. +5
          15 November 2025 09: 30
          Quote: ArchiPhil
          Tez 5524 is quite something in its own right!

          I agree, I remember that one... there was something about it too, but I think that all the locomotives back then were beautiful in their own way, but statics were not much different from movement; steam locomotives are mesmerizing in motion (especially slow and close) (IMHO)
        2. +6
          15 November 2025 09: 34
          Sergey good morning!
          To each his own!!! drinks
          "Tight, green, smells like sausage!"...that came to mind.
          1. +10
            15 November 2025 09: 36
            "Tight, green, smells like sausage!"...that came to mind.

            And this is already to *er2*! laughing And to her *relatives*. By the way, she's also quite pretty. Greetings, Vlad, greetings! hi
            1. +6
              15 November 2025 09: 41
              Quote: ArchiPhil
              er2

              rvr, "rigas vagonyu rupcica"... and where is it now?.. that's right, in this very place... :(
              1. +8
                15 November 2025 09: 48
                in this very place... :(

                Sergey, I'm actually talking about the design of bygone eras. I don't know if the developers of old technology were ever under the stern thumb of managers demanding, "Make it simpler, straighter, without all those squiggles and curves, okay?" But what's certain is that old and bygone technology, absolutely ANY, including a typewriter, looks today not like an anachronism, but like something made with love! hi
                1. +5
                  15 November 2025 09: 55
                  Quote: ArchiPhil
                  Yes, I'm actually talking about the design of times gone by... absolutely ANYTHING, including a typewriter, looks today not like an anachronism, but like a THING made with love!

                  + x37000
                  and I, too, however... but then, out of nowhere, another association popped up, looking at the "label"... purely emotional, although out of place...
              2. +6
                15 November 2025 09: 57
                in this very place... :(

                Well, in this place there is RAF, VEF and some other things. laughing And our *ZIL* and AZLK??? bully
                1. +4
                  15 November 2025 10: 14
                  Quote: ArchiPhil
                  And our *ZIL* and AZLK???

                  Don't rub salt into a soul "exhausted by Narzan"...
                  By the way, the aforementioned grandfather had a Moskvich 401, it wasn't exactly a star, but it was still going strong until the late 70s and early 80s.
            2. +5
              15 November 2025 10: 26
              Now that Ivolga trains have become more common, and Lastochka trains are flying along the Moscow Central Circle, I perceive the transition from a regular commuter train to these as a transition from 3rd to 2nd class.

              Especially if they are free.
              1. +6
                15 November 2025 10: 59
                I perceive it as a transition from 3rd to 2nd grade.

                No! It's a time machine! laughing Greetings Sergey!
                1. +5
                  15 November 2025 11: 05
                  Greetings, Seryozha!

                  That's it. What else is needed for joy?

                  As for time machines and commuter trains, I was in Crimea in 2012.

                  The commuter train from Simferopol was like something from my childhood in the Moscow region in the 70s.
                  1. +7
                    15 November 2025 11: 31
                    The commuter train from Simferopol was like something from my childhood in the Moscow region in the 70s.

                    Yes, yes! It's from that world, from the world where the lack of air conditioning didn't bother me at all, where wooden seats didn't cause any trouble, from that world where the grass is greener and the sun is brighter, in a word, from childhood. good Oh, this feels a bit lyrical. bully
                    1. +5
                      15 November 2025 11: 44
                      If you travel for about two hours one way, it’s noticeable.

                      But you know why.

                      If you have to stand for more than an hour in a crowded train car, it’s not the greatest gift.

                      But, of course, these are all details. Not very significant ones.
                      1. +8
                        15 November 2025 11: 50
                        If you have to stand for more than an hour in a crowded train car, it’s not the greatest gift.

                        And they were even SMOKING in the vestibule! laughing Although it's much scarier to ride in a crowded train car next to a hungover man who's been snacking on garlic! There was such a moment. laughing
                      2. +4
                        15 November 2025 11: 59
                        Not a big fan of "Moscow - Petushki".
                        But many moments are very real.

                        And how many books have been read on commuter trains. And not only.
                2. +5
                  15 November 2025 17: 25
                  Greetings, Sergey!!!
                  My daughter vacationed with her classmates in Sochi during her final year of college. They traveled from Krasnodar to Sochi on an Ivolga. There were so many photos and raving stories about her.
                  You Muscovites, of course, got to know the "Ivolga" much earlier. But I haven't had the chance to see it in person yet.
                  1. +4
                    15 November 2025 17: 47
                    Greetings, Sergey!!!

                    Good evening, Dmitry!!!
                    You Muscovites, of course, have met the "Orioles"

                    I only rode the Ivolga once, from Krasny Stroitel to Kalanchevskaya. What were your impressions? Beautiful and bright on the outside. Comfortable and almost silent on the inside. They haven't introduced them on our Paveletsky line yet, so the old ones are still running.
                  2. +2
                    15 November 2025 21: 40
                    Greetings, Dima!

                    The first time I encountered Ivolga was about 5 years ago when I was driving along a quiet route - to Razdory.

                    This is the very road where the "Little Engine from Romashkovo" allowed itself to deviate from the route.

                    And this year, sometimes the Ivolgi have started appearing in our direction too.

                    The new commuter trains are still a joy. They're probably like toys for adults.
          2. +4
            15 November 2025 10: 14
            “Tight, green, smells like sausage!”…
            Commuter trains from Moscow – an unforgettable childhood experience!
            Hello, Vlad!
            1. +6
              15 November 2025 10: 27
              Sometimes I wonder how much of my life is spent on commuter trains? A fair amount.
        3. +6
          15 November 2025 09: 42
          Quote: ArchiPhil
          It looks very good!

          I had one like that made of tin!
      4. +9
        15 November 2025 09: 57
        Quote: Kote pane Kohanka
        I don’t know why, but I personally see a “soul” in steam locomotives.

        My father told me this, and in his younger years he worked for a while as an assistant to the engineer of the "sheep".
        He described the work very vividly. It's probably impossible to convey it in words... request
        1. +4
          15 November 2025 10: 01
          It's probably impossible to convey this in text... request

          Which is not at all surprising, looking at the beautiful lines of the hypothetical *Titanic*, few people would think to look into the lower decks. bully
      5. +4
        15 November 2025 10: 00
        Quote: Kote pane Kohanka
        I see a "soul" in locomotives.

        and not only the soul - in 1965 he caught a coal in his eye from the chimney of a locomotive pulling a train
        1. +6
          15 November 2025 17: 05
          caught a coal in his eye from the chimney of a locomotive pulling a train

          Greetings, Alexander!
          A steam locomotive is a reliable machine, but its funnel occasionally spews burning coal and sparks. These often set dry steppe grass ablaze. But what if you need to haul freight along the sidings of a gunpowder factory or among some other flammable chemical environment? For this purpose, steam locomotives were designed without a firebox—they have no stoker, and nothing burns anywhere. Superheated water is pumped into a huge, durable storage tank, and the steam engine runs on the steam generated by this water until the water cools or its level drops. Then the locomotive goes into recharging mode. The German pharmaceutical plant Bayerwerk employed this cute little hulk—the fireproof narrow-gauge steam locomotive Salophen 22. Actually, "salophen" is the name of a popular antiseptic and antipyretic drug invented in 1891 by the very same Bayer company. This is also a mechanism, without heat. The locomotive was built in 1917 at the Hohenzollern locomotive factory in Düsseldorf. It's funny that it worked until 1973!
          1. +4
            15 November 2025 17: 14
            There were also steam locomotives powered by electric locomotives. Switzerland didn't have its own hydrocarbons, but it did have steam locomotives. Even before WWII, numerous small power plants were built on Swiss mountain rivers, and with electricity, the railways could be converted to electric traction. And they did. But not all of them. Shunting work at stations was performed by small steam locomotives—what would they use to power them? Why not use electric locomotives here too? Shunting requires frequent changes in speed and direction, and controlling the speed of an AC induction motor without electronics is difficult. Of course, electric shunting locomotives were eventually built, but the problem needed to be addressed urgently. And so, on January 13, 1943, an unusual-looking locomotive rolled out of the workshops at Yverdon-les-Bains station, 60 kilometers from Bern. It was, of course, a steam locomotive, but on the roof of its cab was an electric locomotive pantograph. The steam-electric hybrid was based on a serial shunting locomotive of the Swiss Railways, the E 3/3 "Tigerli." Its boiler was equipped with two powerful electric heating elements (TEH), prompting the locomotive to be nicknamed "tauchsieder"—"electric boiler." Current from the overhead contact line was supplied through a step-down transformer. The locomotive was equipped with a powerful battery to power the circulation pump and the internal electrical system. As a result of the conversion, the locomotive became 7 tons heavier, necessitating the reinforcement of the undercarriage and springs. However, coal savings amounted to up to a ton per day, which saved over 300 tons of valuable raw material annually. The locomotive could also operate on non-electrified sections of track, but only for 20 minutes, as the steam supply in the boiler was sufficient for that duration without preheating. On February 11, 1943, the second steam locomotive of the E 3/3 type was also converted to electric power, but it also turned out to be the last: by that time, electric locomotives had already arrived.
            on the picture: "tauchsieder" — "electric boiler".
            1. +4
              15 November 2025 17: 36
              That's so cool. We'd still be laughing at that. We love that.
              It's also worth mentioning the steam locomotives (I don't remember what they were called), which simply pumped steam. And they ran like that as long as the steam was hot. They were also used as shunting locomotives at factories where steam was available.
              1. 0
                16 November 2025 18: 59
                fireless steam locomotives................................ hi
      6. +5
        15 November 2025 10: 48
        Bolshevism is the essence of Russian civilization.

        Quote: Kote pane Kohanka
        Model of the Cherepanov steam locomotive and its descendants (Ekaterinburg).

        N. Tagil. Monument to the Cherepanov brothers, inventors of the first steam locomotive.
        1. +7
          15 November 2025 10: 52
          The essence of Russian civilization is Bolshevism.

          N. Tagil. Steam locomotive monument opposite the museum:
        2. +6
          15 November 2025 11: 08
          ❝ Monument brothers Cherepanov ❞ —

          — “Efim Alekseevich and Miron Efimovich Cherepanov (Father Efim (1774-1842) and son Miron (1803-1849), sometimes erroneously referred to as Cherepanov brothers) - Russian industrial engineers and inventors" © ...
      7. +4
        15 November 2025 12: 00
        Quote: Kote pane Kohanka
        ..... I see a "soul" in steam locomotives. Modern diesel locomotives and electric trains don't evoke such feelings.....
        Even veteran engineers expressed this opinion. Our steam locomotive industry peaked under Stalin, but with Khrushchev's rise to power, steam locomotives were prematurely decommissioned (even in coal-mining regions, where their operation was quite profitable). They were replaced by diesel locomotives, which were far from perfect at the time, but showed the world that our country was at the cutting edge of progress.
        1. +3
          15 November 2025 12: 36
          Steam locomotives have expensive infrastructure. Water pumps and coal loading stations are located every 36 km.
        2. +3
          15 November 2025 12: 42
          Well, then, imagine this. There's a section of track. One is run by diesel locomotives, the other by steam locomotives. The locomotives need to be changed. The personnel, their training, and then the infrastructure are different again. They can pull trains of different weights.
          Either there are diesel locomotives everywhere, or vice versa. He put another crew on and that's it.
          So here, steam locomotives are a hindrance. Even despite the momentary appearance. But it's still clear to anyone that heat and electric locomotives are more promising.
      8. +4
        15 November 2025 12: 34
        The passing of a steam locomotive draws everyone's attention—children and adults alike. But an electric or diesel locomotive doesn't. There are songs about steam locomotives, but where are the ones about diesel locomotives? laughing
        Just the firing up of a steam locomotive is a sight to behold.
      9. +7
        15 November 2025 13: 43
        In St. Petersburg, for example, there are places to see steam locomotives. First and foremost, the Railway Museum.
        Retro excursion trains depart from Vitebsk Station. The Children's Railway features a narrow-gauge locomotive.
        1. +5
          15 November 2025 18: 06
          I will add one more thing to the "locomotive" history of St. Petersburg.
          In the 80s, attempts were made to replace horse-drawn trams with so-called steam locomotives. The first steam locomotive appeared in the city on June 26, 1886, on Bolshoy Sampsonievsky Prospekt. A small locomotive pulled several horse-drawn carriages carrying passengers. The project proved profitable, and soon three more steam railway lines were built in St. Petersburg. At first, steam trains consisted of two or three carriages, and later, four. In the summer, open carriages—without walls—were used. Riding on these platforms was uncomfortable due to the soot and sparks flying from the locomotive's chimney. Among workers, they earned the nickname "smoke-smoke." By 1922, steam locomotives had already disappeared from city streets, but during the Great Patriotic War, amidst electricity shortages, they resumed service in Leningrad.
          Another picture - from the Railway Museum - a section of a steam locomotive.
          1. +3
            15 November 2025 20: 15
            Several photographs of steam locomotives that are still in operation on the Severnaya Zvezda Railway.
            Occasionally they pull excursion trains to the museum in Verkhnyaya Pyshma.
  4. +4
    15 November 2025 08: 20
    Thanks for the interesting post!

    Are there still opportunities for those who are straightforward and curious, but only capable of what they understand and can do themselves? Without organic chemistry, nanotechnology, or the dismantling of government funding...
  5. +4
    15 November 2025 08: 35
    We continue our "steam locomotive story"

    Finally, I've been waiting for it for so long :)
    Thank you, and we won't refuse a continuation!
    1. +6
      15 November 2025 09: 00
      Quote: Rodez
      and we will not refuse a continuation!

      There should be two more articles... and "I've been waiting for it for a long time" is not my fault... I didn't put myself in the hospital for two weeks... They have completely dropped out of my life!
      1. +6
        15 November 2025 09: 04
        Quote: kalibr
        I didn't put myself in the hospital myself

        oh-oh... pardon, I did have a thought in connection with a certain "long" silence, regardless of locomotives...
        Wishing you a speedy recovery and good health!
        1. +5
          15 November 2025 09: 04
          Quote: Rodez
          and good health

          Thank you!
      2. +2
        15 November 2025 18: 45
        ended up in the hospital for two weeks.

        Get well soon. Good health.
        There should be two more articles.

        Greetings, Caliber!
        It would be a good idea to also write about the most powerful machine in the history of Soviet steam locomotive construction – the Joseph Stalin steam locomotive, which at the time of its construction was the most powerful not only in the Union, but in all of Europe.
        The locomotive demonstrated a power of 2500 hp, which was more than twice the power of the Su locomotive, and in some cases the power value of the IS even reached 3200 hp. In addition, the locomotive had an unusually high boiler boost - up to 80 kgf/m²•h. In 1937, one of the IS series steam locomotives (namely the IS20-241) was presented at the World Exhibition in Paris, where it received the Grand Prix.
        1. +3
          15 November 2025 20: 46
          Quote: Richard
          It would be nice to write

          Thank you! I'll think about it...
        2. +2
          15 November 2025 22: 53
          about the most powerful machine in the history of Soviet steam locomotive construction – the Joseph Stalin steam locomotive

          In fact, the most powerful locomotive in the history of Soviet steam locomotive construction was the P-38.
          1. +5
            15 November 2025 23: 42
            Still, VikNik, the P-38 is not a production locomotive, but a 1955 experimental series of four freight locomotives, and already in February 1956, at the 20th Congress of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, a decision will be made to cease further construction of steam locomotives and the widespread introduction of diesel and electric locomotives.
            In all fairness, the P-38, as the pinnacle of Soviet steam locomotive engineering, certainly deserves coverage, if not a separate article. Thanks for reminding me about it.
            1. 0
              16 November 2025 14: 28
              The P-38 is not a production locomotive.

              There was a serial P-36. It was also more powerful, although not significantly.
  6. +5
    15 November 2025 09: 39
    Verkhnyaya Pyshma has a magnificent railway locomotive exhibit, including unique pre-revolutionary Ovechki locomotives. Two steam locomotives were pulled out by helicopter from the unfinished Stalinist Northern Meridian Railway.
  7. +6
    15 November 2025 09: 50
    The cylinders were placed horizontally in 1834 (the Trevithick, Blenkinsop, Hedley, Blucher and Locomotive locomotives had cylinders positioned vertically in the boiler)
    ,
    The Cherepovs immediately installed the cylinders horizontally in 1834.

    The first freight locomotive with three driving (coupling) axles was built in 1846 in St. Petersburg at the Aleksandrovsky Machine-Building Plant. This plant then, in addition to freight locomotives, began building passenger locomotives with two driving axles and a two-axle front bogie. In 1858, the Aleksandrovsky Plant produced the world's first powerful freight locomotive with four driving axles.

    In 1878, the world's first passenger steam locomotives with a front bogie were built at the Kolomna plant, based on a design by Russian engineers, which contributed to improved train safety. Such locomotives only appeared abroad in 1892.

    In 1891, the Kolomna plant built the first steam locomotive with steam condensation. At the end of the 19th century, Russian engineers were the first in the world to use superheaters. During this same period, the outstanding Russian engineers L. P. Borodin and L. M. Levi pioneered the use of double expansion of steam in steam locomotives. V. I. Lopushinsky and S. I. Smirnov substantiated and utilized the principle of standardization and interchangeability of parts and assemblies in steam locomotives. E. E. Nolteip organized the construction of articulated steam locomotives for Russian railways long before their introduction in America.

    Russia has made a worthy contribution to global steam locomotive construction.
    1. +5
      15 November 2025 12: 33
      The first freight locomotive with three driving (coupling) axles was built in 1846 in St. Petersburg at the Aleksandrovsky Machine-Building Plant.

      You forgot to specify—the first in Russia. The first steam locomotive with an 0-3-0 wheel arrangement was Stephenson's "Duke," built in 1817.
      Below is a Kitson and Company Hector 0-3-0 steam locomotive, circa 1845.
    2. +4
      15 November 2025 14: 42
      In 1891, the Kolomensky plant built the first steam locomotive with steam condensation in the history of locomotive construction.

      Everything you've got is out of place. The photo below shows a Beyer Peacock steam condensing locomotive from 1864.
      1. +1
        15 November 2025 15: 29
        One of this series, Cecil Raikes, is in the Liverpool Museum and is said to be in working order.
    3. +2
      15 November 2025 15: 24
      One of the first condenser steam locomotives was built in 1862 by Kitson&Co in Leeds and named Czar in honor of the Tsar of the Russian Empire.
  8. +12
    15 November 2025 10: 41
    In Russia, the first steam locomotive was built in 1834 by the Cherepanov brothers.

    A classic error of pre-revolutionary and secular historiography. In reality, Fim Alekseevich and Miron Efimovich Cherepanov were father and son.
    1. +7
      15 November 2025 10: 59
      And the son, “due to his high literacy,” was assigned to the office at the age of 10.

      One of my grandmother's brothers had a similar story. He lived with the Runov factory owners in Meshchera, near Moscow.
    2. +3
      15 November 2025 11: 52
      Quote: Kote pane Kohanka
      A classic error of pre-revolutionary and secular historiography.

      Live and learn!
  9. +5
    15 November 2025 15: 18
    "It was intended as a demonstration of the potential of steam traction, not as a revenue-generating locomotive, but it went into service nonetheless."
    Here it is!
    The beginnings of the modern economic theory of creative destruction. Back in the 20s, companies advertised like this: "Buy our products, and not only your children, but your grandchildren and great-grandchildren will enjoy them!"
    It turned out to be unprofitable. Indeed, if they skimped, it would last for a hundred years—like furniture. And then they introduced expiration dates—in the thirties of that same last century. A person would buy a seemingly durable thing, and after two years it would fall apart. Like it or not, buy a new one.
    And now, a steam locomotive from the past becomes a symbol of the current economic era. Toss those big steam locomotives we just bought! Let's try this little one. And if it doesn't live up to expectations, we'll definitely get something new. And where to put this one? Into the warehouse! And unload it on the cheap...
    Capitalism rose precisely because at its inception there was a period of creative destruction, when technological innovations were eagerly seized and adopted. Then came stagnation. Then came the profanation of long production runs of products, structurally and technologically unchanged but with a limited shelf life—a profanation that has survived to this day, and then suddenly!...
    Today you buy an iPhone 14, but tomorrow you're offered an iPhone 15, and entire batches of the previous iPhone are being warehoused and sold off at a discount. And in this mad race to climb the technological ladder, you see John Fitch's miniature prototype—a tiny, seemingly useless train!

    Good afternoon, dear Vyacheslav Olegovich and my dear friends – everyone present!
    Happy first snow!
    good drinks wassat love )))
    1. +4
      15 November 2025 15: 51
      And in this mad race to climb the vertical of technological progress, a miniature prototype of John Fitch can be seen - a small and, it would seem, useless locomotive!
      Poetically written and absolutely correct! It's easier to buy than to repair. And unfortunately, not only equipment. recourse
      1. +4
        15 November 2025 16: 19
        The main thing is, you can't buy a new life, right?
        New, young, healthy. Look, our Vyacheslav Olegovich, it turns out, is falling apart. And if you only knew how sick my son is. Severe asthma, and it's a death sentence. I can't sleep at night, I walk around, listening to see if he's breathing. And his breathing is like John Fitch's steam locomotive. It turns out that in the Moscow region, instead of recycling garbage, they've installed incinerators at landfills, and they burn, binding oxygen and releasing toxins. Everyone's getting sick!
        I get up at night, open the window – there's no oxygen! Now they've got Kogan, a State Duma deputy, and the Austrian entrepreneur Kaiser by the gills for introducing these flares. But the deed is done – older and middle-aged people in the Moscow region started suffering from asthma and pulmonary edema as early as this summer. This is the price of lagging behind scientific progress. I wonder what Vyacheslav Olegovich is doing there? He's a techie, a historian of science, he should know. And anyway, there are too many fires in the Russian Federation due to military action. This is when politics and diplomacy fail to replace one locomotive with a more progressive one, and as a result, citizens suffer, even those very far from the LBS.
        1. +4
          15 November 2025 16: 29
          The main thing is, you can't buy a new life, right?

          I actually meant boots! laughing laughing laughing
          1. +5
            15 November 2025 16: 44
            boots

            You're a sly one! )))
            I have sneakers that I've been wearing for 10 years, and there's no end in sight for them. And if you go to the Wildbears telegram, I'm already from the era of mastodons! According to the theory of progressive destruction, they suggest throwing my sneakers in the trash and my clothes, which I've been wearing since 98 and which never seem to end—they never wear out, damn it!—all of this should be thrown in the trash and new steam engines should be bought. This is so as not to interfere with the Chinese manufacturer's climb up the vertical of technological progress. And I, the scoundrel that I am, can't even understand what they offer in the catalog. The only things I realized are parkas, those youthful jackets with hoods. Everything else—the names of the products are a mystery. And it turns out that it's not that I don't want to trade a steam engine for a diesel locomotive—I'm just too old for this. wassat )))
            1. +3
              15 November 2025 16: 49
              I have sneakers that I've been wearing for 10 years,

              Those bastards sure knew how to do things, huh?!?! laughing Honestly, but these are some kind of miracle workers! Ten years!!! Wow, I respect you! good
            2. +3
              15 November 2025 17: 10
              The only thing I realized was parkas, youth-style jackets with hoods.

              This is what we, in our simplicity and naivety, called *Alaskas*. laughing
          2. +3
            15 November 2025 16: 58
            boots
            Father Emil from Lennenberg?
            Hello, Sergey!
            1. +3
              15 November 2025 17: 02
              Father Emil from Lennenberg?

              No, some *Gred* from Walsberry, I liked the design and I didn’t go wrong, damn it, I’ve been wearing it for four years now! laughing
              Hello, Sergey!

              Good evening Anton! hi
        2. +2
          15 November 2025 16: 40
          It turns out that in the Moscow region, instead of recycling waste, incinerators have been installed at landfills, and they burn, binding oxygen and releasing toxins.

          Are these the ones that are better than the Swiss ones, as the authorities claimed? Well, yes, it's the same old story: *unparalleled in the world* bullyI sympathize with you with all my heart.
        3. +2
          15 November 2025 20: 43
          Quote: depressant
          What's going on at Vyacheslav Olegovich's?

          There's only one answer: 80% of people at ALL LEVELS are FOOLS (in the everyday sense). It's clear that the very rich differ from the poor, but the result is the same - "torches instead of recycling." After us, the deluge.
    2. +4
      15 November 2025 16: 10
      Quote: depressant
      Happy first snow!

      Thank you! It's raining here now, cold, and very nasty.
      1. +4
        15 November 2025 16: 25
        Vyacheslav Olegovich, my dear! crying
        Please get well! I insist on it. We are the last dinosaurs of a clearly defined era, and we must hold on. Otherwise, our young tribe will be lost in a complete fog. The kind I've been watching outside my window for many days now.
        1. +4
          15 November 2025 16: 35
          Quote: depressant
          Otherwise, our young tribe will be caught in a complete fog. The kind I've been watching outside my window for many days now.

          Thanks again! Well... my health has improved greatly. It was even interesting. And the way I interacted with the people... I changed THREE wards. Three lieutenant colonels (!), three foul-mouthed drivers + a retired engineer of the same ilk, + a young driver of high morals (a true believer!!!) + many others from regional villages and towns - after all, it is a regional hospital. I read Kipling's poems to them. They applauded... Once again I am convinced of the correctness of my views regarding our "masses". They are good people, we just need to improve our mentality a little. I came up with a topic for a new book, which made all these dreary weeks worthwhile, and I even wrote a plan for it. Upon my return, my friend lent me his new acquisition - a completely unique flintlock pistol. I just wrote an article about it and posted it for moderation. Now I am sitting here, collecting epigraphs for a new book... I hope they won't "cut" me anymore... All the best to you. And the fog... Remember: We are going to the Emerald City along a difficult road, we are going along a difficult road, a road not straight, fog, fog is swirling, we can’t see a thing, there is nothing more necessary than smart brains!
          1. +4
            15 November 2025 17: 02
            We are going to the Emerald City along a difficult road, we are going along a difficult road, a road that is not straight, fog, fog is swirling, we can’t see a thing, there is nothing more necessary than smart brains!

            Oh my God! How I missed this!
            While on Telegram and TikTok, it turned out my YouTube account had been restored. I logged in and out. I know in advance what they'll say—a destructive stream. Creation is only here, on VO, with my favorite creators.
            Respect!
            Many years! love ))))))
            1. +1
              15 November 2025 20: 38
              Quote: depressant
              Came in and went out.

              There was NO internet at all in the hospital where I was staying. None! That was bad. Especially for me.
        2. +3
          15 November 2025 16: 45
          dinosaurs of the era,

          It's clear with male dinosaurs, but how do you designate a female specimen of this species? laughing Lyudmila Yakovlevna, we will still fight, not everything is so gloomy, really!
          1. +3
            15 November 2025 17: 06
            we will fight some more

            We will fight again!
            Holy words!
            Dear Sergey Vladimirovich! My forever and ever friend!
            I'm ready! soldier ))))
            1. +3
              15 November 2025 17: 08
              I'm ready!

              Uhhh! *Be prepared!* And in response, the voice of the great Papanov: *Uvsehda hotov!* laughing
    3. +4
      15 November 2025 16: 32
      Happy first snow!
      "And after two stations: that's it, we're done for!
      For you this is your home, but for me it’s like the first snow,
      The conductor is sweet, with jokes and laughter,
      We are saying goodbye, and perhaps forever!
      Hello, Lyudmila Yakovlevna!
      1. +4
        15 November 2025 16: 51
        Hello

        Anton, dear, may you also stay healthy! love
        Let our locomotive, noticeably outdated in design, pull us into a new, progressive future! Even if we, like savages, look around and ask dummies' questions, whether or not they're relevant—"What's this? What's this?"
        We're smart, we'll figure it out, right? wassat )))
    4. +4
      15 November 2025 17: 10
      Mom! Look out the window -
      It must be no wonder that yesterday there was a cat
      Washed my nose:
      There is no dirt, the whole yard is covered,
      It has brightened, it has turned white -
      Apparently there is frost.


      Let it all melt. But the pre-winter season shows that such a season exists.
      1. +5
        15 November 2025 17: 36
        Let it all melt. But...

        Sergey, dear, I missed you! love )))
        You won't believe it? You'd be wrong!
        It's a shame our Andrei Borisovich, Tolstoy, didn't come. I love our company immensely. Especially when it gathers in the Master's house—Vyacheslav Olegovich. And we, so different, talk about our troubles and argue with each other.
        And let new people come, especially young ones. I can tell you from experience, they're wonderful! And that's why I think a difficult but wonderful future awaits us all. After all, it's impossible to live without a vision of the future, right? Look, Vyacheslav Olegovich was given a pistol to wear, and he already has an article ready! So, step by step, we're approaching the future. And the past? Away! Lessons learned!
        1. +4
          15 November 2025 18: 13
          And that is why it seems to me that a difficult but wonderful future awaits us all.
          Could you just say "wonderful," without "difficult"? My difficult past is starting to take its toll, and I'm afraid I won't be able to handle a difficult future.
          1. +3
            15 November 2025 18: 44
            All in the best traditions of "Heart of a Dog":


            Harsh years go
            Fights for the freedom of the country,
            Behind them others come -
            They will be difficult too
            1. +3
              15 November 2025 20: 19
              By the way, I can't handle a difficult future either. But you can't escape it – Professor Solovey predicts it.
              Such is the era of property redistribution. I'm also responding to Anton.
              1. +4
                15 November 2025 20: 21
                There are some things that are eternal. For example, the changing seasons.

                And the harvest can ripen even under a roof.
        2. +4
          15 November 2025 18: 42
          It's always nice to drop by for a chat, Lyudmila Yakovlevna. Especially in the fall and winter.
          1. +5
            15 November 2025 20: 22
            Ah, if only this were true in reality...
            It's magical!
            This is how we could all gather, my dear, my good ones! And our beloved Authors. And strong tea, and sweet cheesecakes, and the crackling of logs in the fireplace – that's happiness!
            1. +4
              15 November 2025 20: 32
              Everything is in our hands, Lyudmila Yakovlevna!

              I don’t think I’m revealing a big secret by saying that tickets to St. Petersburg are already in my pocket.

              All that remains is to wait for a tailwind, that is, the Sapsan in December.

              So, everything is real.

              Hang in there, people, summer is coming.
  10. 0
    17 November 2025 03: 51
    Polzunov's Russian steam engine of 1764—the world's first. We are Russians, God is with us!
  11. 0
    19 November 2025 02: 26
    American locomotives had a number of distinctive features that were undoubtedly determined by the needs of the national economy, as well as geographical conditions.

    It is interesting that locomotive builders and restless inventors took a long time to come up with the idea of ​​a steam-powered wheel loader.
    Although it was clearly necessary in ports, on ships, and in factories for intensive cargo handling, steam tractors, prime movers, and steam cranes were invented almost immediately. For example, with such a loader, it would have been possible to build specialized vessels designed for the seaborne delivery of engineering products such as machine tools, steam locomotives, and rolled metal products. At one point, the demand for steam locomotives was so great that Americans sometimes smuggled them by sea, without identifying them.
  12. 0
    23 November 2025 19: 16
    It's strange that they thought of a steam locomotive, but couldn't come up with a basic cabin, or at least a canopy on early steam locomotives?!
  13. 0
    23 November 2025 21: 13
    At home, I still have a working children's steam engine with two swinging cylinders, built around the 1920s. My grandfather (a physicist and methodologist well known to the generation of teachers from the 1950s to the 1980s) gave it to me. He used this machine to explain heat engineering to me. I still fix it sometimes—I solder the tank, check the safety valve. As a child, I attached wheels to it and connected them with a belt to the drive shaft. The contraption would puff and crawl, and my relatives would yell that I'd set the apartment on fire.