The Hungarian scenario for the collapse of the Red Empire

10 642 29
The Hungarian scenario for the collapse of the Red Empire


The Third World War


In 1956, the thousand-year confrontation between Rus' and the Western world continued. This was already World War III, dubbed the "Cold War." It was a unique war—informational, ideological, and economic—that periodically turned "hot" on the periphery of the developed world. – in Korea, Vietnam, Egypt, Syria, etc.



The war was greatly prolonged, as the rulers of Paris, London, and Washington were unable to start a war in the style of World War II. The Russians had powerful armored and air forces, the best in the world, and their own nuclear weapons. weaponTherefore, the war was fragmented into informational, economic, political-diplomatic, special (intelligence services) operations, local wars, revolutions and coups.

But the logic of the war was the same – to defeat and dismember the Russian (Soviet) state, to drive it out of its occupied positions, spheres of influence and markets (Why the West launched the Third World War). The Western masters tried to ruin the fruits of the Russians' brutal Great War against the Nazi hordes, to render meaningless the millions of victims of the Russian super-ethnos. To derail Stalin's successes. In essence, to do what the rotten leaders of Soviet civilization, under the leadership of Gorbachev and Yeltsin, would later do with their own hands.

In 1949, the West formed the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which chose the four-pointed compass star as its emblem. With this symbol, the West's masters demonstrated their desire for power over the entire planet. A new world order, the predatory and disgusting grin of which Hitler revealed.

secret war


Westerners are trying to undermine the Soviet Empire and its sphere of influence.Thus, saboteurs are trained in Greece. In 1951, the United States attempted to foment civil war in Albania, which under Stalin had been a staunch ally of the USSR. Groups of migrant fighters were trained in camps scattered across Libya, Malta, Cyprus, and Corfu. They were also trained in West Germany—in Bavaria, at Hitler's famous headquarters in Berchtesgaden.

It is worth remembering that British and American intelligence agencies welcomed many seasoned Nazis and Hitlerites with open arms. They used experienced saboteurs, terrorists, war criminals, and agents of the fallen Third Reich.The US and British intelligence services had access to thousands of "dogs of war"—Germans and Hungarians, Poles and Croats, Ukrainian nationalists, and others.

The Westerners' operation in Albania failed. The militants were met with the expected response – fire. One of the leaders of British intelligence, Kim Philby, was working for the Russians. Therefore, Stalin learned of the enemy operation in time and warned Albanian leader Enver Hoxha.

In April 1953, the Russians thwarted a covert American operation in Western Ukraine. The paratroopers dropped in Ukraine from a "flying fortress" that had taken off in Greece were captured. Such drops of enemy agents were common during this period. They were deployed to Ukraine, Belarus, the Baltics, and elsewhere.

Moreover, three saboteurs, as it turned out, had been "inherited" by the Americans from the Nazis. The agents were carrying shortwave radios, potassium cyanide, printing plates for Soviet-style documents, clichés for anti-Soviet leaflets, and portable beacons for guiding NATO strategic bomber squadrons. The agents admitted that they were supposed to infiltrate Kyiv and Odesa and await further instructions.

The West attempted to extend the "echoes of war" across the Soviet Union. Until the early 50s, "forest brothers," Baltic nationalists, and bandits fought in the Baltic forests. Until almost the mid-50s, in the dense forests and foothills of Western Ukraine, they had to wage war against well-organized, hidden, and heavily armed groups of Banderites, first trained by German intelligence services and then taken under American wing.

Bandera's followers were controlled by a central command in Munich. They deployed "esbeks"—special officers from the Bezpeka (Security Service)—to maintain discipline. Hidden hideouts and secret refuges in cities and forests were located throughout Western Ukraine. Bandera's army relied on recruits from Ukrainian nationalist paramilitary societies that flourished in the 30s under Polish rule. Many Bandera followers were experienced militants who had fought throughout World War II and beyond. They had received sabotage training from German intelligence.

They were masters of sabotage and guerrilla warfare. Disguised as Soviet Army soldiers, they slaughtered entire villages to incite hatred among the Western Russian population—the Hutsuls, the Boykos (Podgorians), and the Rusyns—for the Soviet regime and the "Muscovites." It was to them that American planes dropped aid and infiltrated agents.

Support for Banderov's followers also came through the Vatican and the Roman Catholic Church. Banderov's followers were primarily Uniates by faith—a perversion of Orthodoxy that recognized the authority of the Pope in the 16th century.

Stalin mercilessly suppressed the Baltic and Ukrainian Nazi gangs who carried out the will of their Western masters. He deprived them of their "ground," establishing peaceful and prosperous life in Soviet Ukraine and the Baltic states.

Hitler's "Strategic Fortress"


Westerners are looking for the Red Empire's weak points. In particular, they are trying to undermine Hungary. During the liberation of Hungary from the Nazis and local nationalists in 1944–1945, the fighting was fierce and bloody. The Hungarians fought until the very end of the Great War. The Red Army lost 140 men during the battle for Hungary (Operation Konrad: Germans try to throw the Russians into the Danube; The Fall of the Budapest Fortress).

In medieval Latin and English, the word "Hungary" itself translates as "Hungary," meaning "land of the Huns." In the Middle Ages, Hungary was often called the "kingdom of the Huns" because the Huns were considered the legendary ancestors of the Hungarians.

The remnant of the Austro-Hungarian Empire, which fell during World War I, like other Habsburg empire's subsidiary states, attempted to build its own "empire," a "Greater Hungary," at the expense of its neighbors. In the 30s, Hungary, led by the dictator Admiral Horthy, became a loyal satellite of Hitler. It housed camps for the Ustaše—Croatian nationalists, also allies of Hitler—who, after the fall of Yugoslavia in 1941, massacred the Orthodox and Serbian population, killing hundreds of thousands.

The Hungarians themselves (whose native name was Magyars) were excellent soldiers and fought for Hitler to the end. They participated in the invasion of the USSR in 1941, fielding a mobile corps against us, and then the 2nd Army. The 1st Hungarian Army fought alongside the Germans in Ukraine in 1944. Hungarian units also distinguished themselves as some of the most fearsome punitive forces, conducting the most brutal operations against partisans in Belarus, Ukraine, and the Bryansk, Kursk, and Voronezh regions of the RSFSR.


Hungarians with a poster of Miklós Horthy, 1943

Hungary's oil fields served as a fuel base for the Third Reich. The Second Hungarian Army was destroyed on Russian soil, and in 1944, our armies approached Hungary itself. Horthy wavered and began secret negotiations with the United States and Britain to conclude a separate peace. Hitler, with the help of his favorite saboteur and master of special operations, Otto Skorzeny, destroyed Horthy's regime, and Horthy himself was arrested. The regime of Ferenc Szálasi, the local Nazi leader, was established in Hungary. A mass hunt for Jews and Roma began. Of the approximately 800,000 Jews living in Hungary by 1941, only about 200,000 survived the genocide.

The Nazis and Szálasi supporters fought to the last for Hungary. There was no mass armed resistance to the Horthy-Szálasi regime in Hungary. Ten partisan detachments are known to have existed, some of which were deployed to Hungary from the USSR.

The fighting was extremely fierce. The Hungarians formed four SS divisions: the 25th SS Volunteer Infantry Division "Hunyadi" (1st Hungarian), the 26th SS Volunteer Infantry Division (2nd Hungarian), the 22nd SS Volunteer Cavalry Division "Maria Theresia", and the 33rd SS Volunteer Cavalry Division (3rd Hungarian).

Hungary is the center of Europe. Strategic communications, the Danube. Access to the Alpine frontier, Austria, East Germany, and the Czech Republic, control of communications leading to the Balkans. Hitler's "gas station," his tank и aviation connections.

Therefore, Hitler attached great importance to the defense of Hungary, hoping to create a strategic "fortress" there, stop the Russian advance on the Danube, and then launch a counteroffensive. This led to the brutal battles for Budapest, at Lake Balaton ("Spring Awakening" and "Alpine Fortress": Hitler's Last Hopes; Defeat of the 6th SS Panzer Army at Lake Balaton).

That's why London also had its eye on Hungary. Churchill pursued the idea of ​​an offensive through the Balkans to the very end, to cut off the Russians from Hungary, Austria, and the Czech Republic. The West didn't get Hungary; it was captured by Soviet troops in a brutal battle.

Few Hungarian soldiers and officers defected to the Soviet side. Initially, only a few thousand. But hundreds of thousands were killed and captured! About 300,000 people died on the Soviet-German front (most of them in 1944–1945), approximately the same number of civilians died, and over 500,000 were captured. As of October 1, 1955, 513,767 Hungarian prisoners of war were registered in the USSR.


A Soviet ZiS-3 76mm gun crew fires on a Budapest street. Winter 1945.

To be continued ...
29 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. + 11
    13 November 2025 04: 45
    Stalin mercilessly suppressed the Baltic and Ukrainian Nazi gangs.
    Didn't press hard enough......
  2. 0
    13 November 2025 05: 45
    In 1956, the thousand-year confrontation between Rus' and the Western world continued.

    Yep, here we go...
  3. +4
    13 November 2025 06: 45
    Speaking of the Soviet period, Mr. Samsonov, the people back then were SOVIET. What do Russians have to do with it? Personally, I bow my head to those Balts, Ukrainians, Kyrgyz, and so on, and consider them Soviet people. Because they fought for the USSR.
    1. +3
      13 November 2025 08: 33
      People were SOVIET back then. What do Russians have to do with it?

      This is a Freudian slip
      For a person who grew up in the USSR, this is almost impossible.
      1. +1
        13 November 2025 08: 46
        And, when by Russian will
        The Ubermaidens will crawl away,
        The West will howl: “Achtung, Fraulein,
        These Russians are coming!
        They creak as they wear away their teeth,
        And - back to my hole,
        To elderly Europe -
        A lonely hole.
        And cheerful soldiers,
        With and without epicanthus,
        Europe will be read again
        Political educational program.
        Because, of course,
        And our Russian people
        All Europe is offended
        Calls Russians everywhere.
    2. -1
      13 November 2025 09: 10
      Quote from: dmi.pris1
      Oh, people were SOVIET back then. What does that have to do with it? русские?

      Wherein:
      On Russian customs, only conflagration
      For Russian scattering the earth behind,
      Before our eyes, comrades were dying,
      By-Russian torn his shirt at the chest.

      Bullets with you are still being pampered.
      But, three times believing that life is all over,
      I was still proud for the sweetest,
      For the bitter land where I was born,

      For the fact that on her die bequeathed to me,
      What Russian our mother gave birth to us,
      What, seeing us off to battle Russian woman
      By-Russian hugged me three times.
      (C)
      1. -1
        14 November 2025 09: 40
        Quote: Olgovich
        For the fact that on her die bequeathed to me,
        That the Russian mother gave birth to us,
        What, in the fight to see us off, a Russian woman
        I hugged three times in Russian.

        Many people don't like Russians. This is obvious from the downvotes you receive. Those who downvote you love jihadists, Zionists, and Wahhabis. drinks These are the modern internationalists, lovers of pilaf and multinationals...
        1. -2
          14 November 2025 15: 51
          That's exactly what they are, these crazy leftists, always ready to betray their own people for the sake of ephemeral brotherhood with other nations and various multinational, friendly, false ideas. And other nations watch, twirling their fingers at their temples and thinking, "What fools, they betrayed their great Russianness, but we'll use it."
    3. -2
      14 November 2025 15: 49
      Perhaps because "Russians" are a real nation with over a thousand years of history, while "Soviet" is an artificial and unviable creation created at the expense of Russians and taken seriously by no one but Russians, much like today's "Rossiyans." We are still reaping the consequences of this unfortunate national policy.
  4. +4
    13 November 2025 08: 39
    The epigraph to the article could be the words of a classic lol
    In short, the Magyars are scum, old sapper Vodicka concluded his story.
  5. BAI
    +4
    13 November 2025 08: 40
    The Russians had powerful armored and air forces, the best in the world, and their own atomic weapons.

    Not Russians, but the Soviet Union.

    The author's dense nationalism is already off-putting

    Constantly spitting in the direction of the West, he nevertheless takes the side of the West, I will say more - the side of Hitler, calling all citizens of the USSR Russians, and denying the right to exist to the Soviet people
    1. 0
      13 November 2025 12: 11
      Some are trying to erase the Soviet period from our memory. And it's completely in vain. That's not what we need to think about. Because the West is trying to erase the achievements of both Soviet and Russian people.
    2. -2
      14 November 2025 16: 23
      How many of you dense multinationals are left... and after all, all the Russians are fools, to a man, find some Azerbaijanis - they never believed in the Soviet people, they always remained themselves
  6. +3
    13 November 2025 19: 29
    A blank shot. Young people don't read such sites, and you can't sell this surrealism to those who have lived through it.
  7. -2
    13 November 2025 21: 37
    An interesting version from Samsonov...
    The West spied on us, waged guerrilla warfare, and almost pocketed Albania... And we were such friendly people that we only defended ourselves?
    And about 1956 and the thousand-year-old Rus/Russia...
    So what kind of Russian cities were there in 956? And how many considered themselves part of the Russian state? Or even Russians, and not Novgorodians, Kievans, or Suzdalians...
    1. -2
      14 November 2025 16: 26
      No, don't be silly, what kind of Rus' was there in 956? It was Ukraine. There was nothing Russian at all. It's a made-up word, invented by the wicked Romanovs, but then the Soviet government quickly exposed them. And created Ukraine at the same time.
  8. -1
    14 November 2025 15: 39
    Quote: Schneeberg
    Stalin mercilessly suppressed the Baltic and Ukrainian Nazi gangs.
    Didn't press hard enough......

    Did not have time...
  9. +1
    14 November 2025 19: 54
    Quote from: newtc7
    No, don't be silly, what kind of Rus' was there in 956? It was Ukraine. There was nothing Russian at all. It's a made-up word, invented by the wicked Romanovs, but then the Soviet government quickly exposed them. And created Ukraine at the same time.


    Well, why be sarcastic?
    A thousand years ago, no one knew anything about Ukraine. There was no such word.
    But to write that only we, Russians, are always for good, and others for evil...
    Well, not quite like that. Everyone for their own, for their own people, and back then, a thousand years ago, it certainly wasn't the Anglo-Saxons against the Russians.
    1. -3
      14 November 2025 20: 37
      And because the lovers of multinationality and plov festivals have become accustomed and very fond of taking away from Russians not only our history, but many even claim that there are and never have been any Russians at all, while at the same time they somehow do not dispute the existence of other nations and treat them with respect.
      It's time for all these gentlemen to develop an alarm reflex. And you, either through ignorance or some peculiar view of history, are playing into their hands.
      For good we are for evil, what does this have to do with the fact that in 956 Rus' existed completely?
    2. 0
      April 13 2026 14: 59
      Fangaro (Novel)

      But to write that only we, Russians, are always for good, and others for evil...


      That's true. I read in the Mythological Dictionary: Ilya Muromets defeated Nightingale the Robber, ... and chopped off his children with an axe.
  10. 0
    14 November 2025 20: 12
    Quote from: newtc7
    Perhaps because "Russians" are a real nation with over a thousand years of history, while "Soviet" is an artificial and unviable creation created at the expense of Russians and taken seriously by no one but Russians, much like today's "Rossiyans." We are still reaping the consequences of this unfortunate national policy.


    Many people in the USSR and the Tsarist Russian Empire, some of whom are still present in our memory, considered themselves Russian. Even some whose surnames and ancestors were not Russian by birth.
    Germans, French, Poles, and many other nationalities fought for the state. And they considered themselves Russian.
    And within the state they were already beginning to quarrel among themselves.
    Here are Kotovsky, Tukhachevsky, Rokossovsky, Vasilevsky, Malinovsky, Petrovsky, Piotrovsky, Gatchina, Rostovsky, Golitsynsky, Oktyabrsky, Vladimirsky, Moscow, Novgorodsky, Estonian...
    Who is the enemy and who is the friend?
    1. -3
      14 November 2025 20: 33
      Germans, French, and Poles were Russified over more than one generation; some retained their last name, and so what? Mentally, and often by blood, they were quite Russian. There's such a thing as assimilation; all of the above are the descendants of people who assimilated long ago.
  11. -1
    14 November 2025 20: 20
    Quote: Tank DestroyerSU-100
    Quote: Schneeberg
    Stalin mercilessly suppressed the Baltic and Ukrainian Nazi gangs.
    Didn't press hard enough......

    Did not have time...


    Maybe you meant to write about gangs? Autocorrect replaced it with nationalities.
    The law should not be selective based on nationality.
    Neither "all dark-skinned people are criminals" nor "all white people look the same."
    Archimedes was not Russian. The Swedes did not invade Russia peacefully in the early 18th century.
  12. -2
    14 November 2025 20: 44
    Quote from: newtc7
    Germans, French, and Poles were Russified over more than one generation; some retained their last name, and so what? Mentally, and often by blood, they were quite Russian. There's such a thing as assimilation; all of the above are the descendants of people who assimilated long ago.


    Yes. I agree. So maybe we shouldn't divide us into Russians and non-Russians? There are a lot of Germans in Russia now, too. And a lot of Ukrainians in Russia.
    There is no need to divide people into ours and our enemies based on skin color, nationality of birth, or knowledge of the Russian language.
    According to their deeds ...
    1. -1
      15 November 2025 14: 43
      Why are you suddenly taking away Russians' right to their nationality? Why can, say, Kazakhs distinguish themselves from Uzbeks, but Russians can't? Where did the glitch in your programming cause you to view the world this way?
      I understand where, unfortunately, the age of leftist agendas and ideology has played a role. Forbid a person to remember who they are—and control them.
  13. -2
    14 November 2025 20: 50
    Quote from: newtc7
    And because the lovers of multinationality and plov festivals have become accustomed and very fond of taking away from Russians not only our history, but many even claim that there are and never have been any Russians at all, while at the same time they somehow do not dispute the existence of other nations and treat them with respect.
    It's time for all these gentlemen to develop an alarm reflex. And you, either through ignorance or some peculiar view of history, are playing into their hands.
    For good we are for evil, what does this have to do with the fact that in 956 Rus' existed completely?


    An anxiety reflex needs to be developed in masters, not masters of a certain nationality or skin color.
    And in 956, which principalities did Rus' consist of? Novgorod, Suzdal, Kyiv, Ryazan?
    And all the Russian princes were so united that sometimes even the Mongols were not needed to burn and plunder Russian cities?
    1. -1
      15 November 2025 14: 50
      So what's the difference between unity and non-unit?
      They spoke the same language, they had the same faith (in fact, two: Christianity and paganism, but they were approximately equal in all the principalities), one culture, one space.
      If you're not aware, civil wars are a natural and normal process that has occurred in ALL countries. Moreover, this process has essentially never ended and never will, because that's just the way the world and people are.
      What does this have to do with the fact that a thousand years ago our ancestors were Russian and called Rus'? When confronted with an external enemy, with rare exceptions, everyone united and went to defeat the adversary.
      And the first real traitor in Rus', who did not enter into a situational alliance with foreigners, but completely came under their influence, was the Russian prince Daniel of Galicia, who founded the glorious city of Lvov.
  14. +1
    15 December 2025 11: 35
    Quote: Alexander Samsonov
    ...of the Red Empire

    Yes

    I don't understand the hissing at "Red" empire"The USSR was the successor of the Russian Empire, but at a higher and fairer level.
    1. 0
      13 January 2026 09: 27
      Based on my ongoing observations of the information agenda and thematic focus of the VO website, I've come to the conclusion that the site's administration is actively following instructions to silence and further condemn the Soviet period of our history. This explains the comfortable anti-Soviet (and therefore Russophobic) attitudes of people like Olgovich. It's quite possible that someone like Samsonov is writing comments on behalf of this character (after all, we don't really know who's writing what). The site's moderation is not transparent, and the authorship of such articles is also difficult to establish. Nevertheless, the site displays a confrontation between the Reds (Russians, Soviets, pro-Soviet, communists, etc.) and the fascists (Bandera-fascists, Zionists, Nazis of all stripes – agents and mercenaries of the anti-Russian coalition). It seems that the editorial staff itself is also divided, as evidenced by a number of historically focused materials exposing the treacherous nature of anti-Soviet activity during the formation of Soviet power and later. As the universally recognized classic once said, "We aimed for communism, but ended up in Russia." All manner of scum will be exposed and held accountable.