Military Review

Nuclear Belarus

133

Belarus has threatened the West with a possible exit from the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty weapons (NPT). According to the official Minsk, the United States and Great Britain, by applying economic sanctions against Belarus, violated their obligations towards the country. And therefore, in Minsk, they can no longer comply with these conditions. This was at least stated by the Belarusian delegation in Geneva at the second session of the Preparatory Committee of the NPT Review Conference.


The Belarusian side stressed that it is very important for it to have tripartite security guarantees provided in accordance with the Budapest Memorandum of the Year 1994 in connection with Belarus’s voluntary refusal of the right to possess nuclear weapons. “Three states - the United Kingdom, Russia and the United States - have committed themselves to respect the independence and sovereignty of Belarus, including not to apply measures of economic coercion,” the Belarusian delegates stressed. And if there are sanctions, it means that Western partners are encroaching on the independence of Belarus.

“A reasonable question arises as to why, despite the commitments recorded and repeatedly confirmed, some nuclear powers ignore them in practice, continuing to apply measures of economic and political pressure. Economic coercion measures taken in the form of sanctions against Belarus in the form of sanctions should be abolished against Belarus. registered in the UN as an international treaty in November 2012. Violation of accepted legal obligations is an unacceptable darstva from the point of view of international law, "- said the Belarusian side.

The irritation of the official Minsk is understandable. The US and the EU apply a whole range of political and economic sanctions to Belarus. Currently, the EU “black list” includes 243 individuals and 32 companies that support the “Lukashenko regime”. The number of blacklisted US is unknown, but perhaps it is even more. We are talking about budget-forming companies, such as Belspecexport, Belneftekhim, Belaruskali. They sell their products mainly in foreign countries. Hence, the sanctions - a direct blow to the budget of the country.

Along the way, Belarus entered a new - practically Soviet - level of military integration with Russia. In May, the Allies will hold large-scale West 2013 exercises, where they will practice a possible nuclear strike on Warsaw. The exercises will be held in close proximity to the Polish borders. In addition, Russia for the first time announced that it plans to permanently deploy its aviation regiment with fighters in Belarus by 2015. According to Russian Minister of Defense Sergei Shoigu, the start of work on this project is planned for this year: Moscow will place with neighbors aviation the commandant’s office and put the first duty unit of combat fighters. "We intend to continue to consider the issues necessary to strengthen the defense capabilities of our Belarusian colleagues and brothers," Shoigu emphasized.

Director of the Minsk Center for European Integration Yuri Shevtsov believes that a significant event has happened for the Belarusian foreign policy. “Relocating an entire air regiment to Belarus in less than two years is very fast. And this reflects a high degree of military alarm regarding NATO or individual NATO countries. Polish greatness games for Poland always ended badly,” the expert explains. And he adds: “It’s unlikely that opposition to Polish activity regarding Belarus will be limited to one Russian aviation committee. At the very least, the Belarusian army’s saturation with new weapons and equipment will go faster now. And if Russian nuclear weapons are deployed in Belarus if the Budapest memorandum collapses, increase orders of magnitude. "

Of course, such activity by the official Minsk will inevitably affect the eastern borders of the EU. Poland and Lithuania will begin to rapidly increase military spending. And if for Poland they are unlikely to become too strong an economic burden, then for Lithuania geopolitical changes will definitely mean additional problems in matters of bringing the country out of the economic crisis. Shevtsov also believes that Russia will increase pressure on Lithuania, both economic and informational. “The EU does not compensate Lithuania for these losses. There will still be no wars between Russia and NATO, and, behold, the losses from the current Polish activity in the east for Lithuania may be quite serious,” the political analyst sums up.

Experts believe it is quite probable that the threats of the Belarusians will not be an empty shaking of the air, and that the country will respond to the sanctions with an exit from the Budapest Memorandum. “The United States has actually already gone out of it. Recently there was a statement, it seems, by the US embassy in Belarus that the United States does not consider this Memorandum as a binding document,” Shevtsov comments.

All this means that Belarus, Ukraine and Kazakhstan are about to receive a legal basis to return to their nuclear status. And in the end, someone who, and Belarus will definitely be able to count on the deployment of Russian nuclear weapons on its territory. Moreover, the Belarusian government already has about 2,5 tons of nuclear materials, some of which have a high degree of enrichment, for example, sufficient for the rapid manufacture of a dirty nuclear bomb.

In addition, "a number of threshold countries will receive additional impetus to the creation of nuclear weapons, as they will see the unreliability of security assurances from the US. Most likely, Iran will be the first to try to become such," describes the more remote consequences of these changes by Shevtsov.

All this is undoubtedly in the hands of Lukashenko. Stanislav Shushkevich, author of the nuclear disarmament program for Belarus, says that “Lukashenko will soon begin to blackmail the United States more actively with a return to nuclear status.” He will do this in order to achieve the lifting of economic sanctions from Belarus. And the Old Man can return to him every time he does not like something in the behavior of NATO member countries. Whether Lukashenko will receive a nuclear weapon, which he has long dreamed of, over the next few years will depend only on Russia.

The USA will obviously have to react to this somehow. An attempt to pacify the intractable Lukashenko could turn into new conflicts for NATO member countries. What is especially unsafe against the background of the growing military power of China and angry rhetoric addressed to the West from Russia.
Author:
Originator:
http://www.rosbalt.ru/exussr/2013/04/25/1122719.html
133 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. GreatRussia
    GreatRussia April 27 2013 16: 43 New
    108
    Belarus threatens the West with possible withdrawal from the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT)

    Well, why not?

    Even, with permission, some Pakistan has nuclear weapons.
    And no one in the West blunders about this.
    And here is a European cultural state surrounded by the criminal organization of NATO ....
    God himself commanded.
    1. Captain Vrungel
      Captain Vrungel April 27 2013 16: 52 New
      86
      The Cold War never ended. We just rushed to capitalism. To celebrate, we put on pink glasses and let's jump for the joy of becoming pink and fluffy with them. The enemy is cunning and treacherous. Gunpowder must always be kept dry.
      1. revnagan
        revnagan April 27 2013 17: 03 New
        20
        Quote: Captain Vrungel
        The Cold War never ended.

        The "Cold War" is the continuation of the "hot" wars of the West against Russian civilization. Didn't the West try to weaken and enslave Russia in every way before the communists came to power? They always needed our resources and free working hands. And the appearance of home-grown capitalists in our space the messenger hasn’t changed. It’s just that now the people who control our states are in the West’s allies (thank God, in Russia the situation has begun to change for the better).
        1. Sibiryak
          Sibiryak April 27 2013 17: 31 New
          -3
          Quote: revnagan
          It’s just that the people who control our states are now allies in the West (thank God, in Russia the situation has begun to change for the better).

          What did you mean by that ??? That everything is good as never before, since our country is ruled by the successors of the West ???
          1. revnagan
            revnagan April 27 2013 18: 04 New
            13
            Quote: Sibiryak
            What did you mean by that ???

            I meant that in the top leadership posts in Russia people began to appear who are not afraid to give the West his shabby little hands. In Ukraine, this is not (yet). And, by the way, it’s correct to write "prИhurry. "
            1. Sibiryak
              Sibiryak April 27 2013 18: 11 New
              +3
              Quote: revnagan
              And, by the way, it is correct to write "prSesshniki".

              Thanks, I will consider! But before you teach me how to spell, learn how to formulate a sentence correctly and there will be no such questions for you, with respect!
            2. Kaa
              Kaa April 27 2013 18: 46 New
              19
              Quote: revnagan
              I meant that in the top leadership posts in Russia people began to appear who are not afraid to give the West its shabby little hands
              ““ The 1994 Budapest memoranda signed by the USA, Russia and Great Britain with Ukraine, Belarus and Kazakhstan contain a guarantee of security for these former republics of the USSR, ”Belarusian political scientist Yuri Shevtsov reminded RBC daily.“ One of the points of this memorandum regarding Belarus is direct the text fixes that no sanctions can be imposed on this country by those who signed it, including the US It is about the fact that the US provoked Belarus to refuse to comply with nuclear-free status in response to a violation of security guarantees by Washington "
              According to the expert, this does not mean that Belarus will become a nuclear power. However, Minsk will receive a legal right to deploy Russian nuclear weapons on its territory. Until recently, the republic did not have such a right. Now, if tougher US economic sanctions go far, Belarus can not only use this new “nuclear” right, but also demand that Russia extend these guarantees to all CSTO participants, including Kazakhstan.
              In other words, now Moscow has actually received a real gift - Russia at any time in full accordance with international law can place nuclear weapons on its territory.http: //www.ukrrudprom.ua/digest/dwererqsdfdfv240308.html
              "Retired Lieutenant General Vasily Latta, who was the chief of staff of the missile regiment armed with the Pioneer complex in Belarus in 1976-1981, and from 1994 to 1997 and from 1997 to 1999 the chief of the operational control of the Strategic Missile Forces and the first deputy chief of staff of the Strategic Missile Forces , told a Nezavisimaya Gazeta observer: “If we left at least one missile division there when the strategic missile forces were withdrawn from Belarus, the situation today, first of all, is both military-political and military-strategic, in the western the direction would be completely different. Today we would not solve the problem of deploying American missile defense systems in Poland and their radar in the Czech Republic. I am deeply convinced that Belarus should have our medium-range missiles. Not necessarily with nuclear warheads. " /bdg.by/news/news.htm?90
              1. Thunderbolt
                Thunderbolt April 27 2013 18: 52 New
                +9
                Quote: Kaa
                Russia at any time in full compliance with international law can deploy nuclear weapons on its territory
                Well, here: what they fought for --- on the Iskanders and ran into it. This explains everything hi )
                1. Papakiko
                  Papakiko April 27 2013 19: 07 New
                  +5
                  Quote: Thunderbolt
                  Well, here: for which they fought --- on the Iskanders and ran into

                  The acre of Iskander is nothing more? belay
                  It seems like a wider assortment. wink
                2. Kaa
                  Kaa April 27 2013 19: 08 New
                  16
                  Quote: Thunderbolt
                  on the Iskanders and ran into
                  This is a Iskander coverage map from the Kaliningrad Region - the whole of Poland, cholera is clear. And now imagine them in Belarus ... the Czech Republic and East Germany, Denmark are added. The Europeans do not know the proverb "Do not wake it while it is quiet"?
                  1. Papakiko
                    Papakiko April 27 2013 19: 53 New
                    19
                    Quote: Kaa
                    And now we will present them in Belarus ... the Czech Republic and East Germany, Denmark are added

                    He bent over the KaA. Vaterland and Danes to cover specifically from Amber Island. And Belarus is all of Poland, Slovaks with Hungarians and Czechs and Romanians. It is subject to NOT application:As part of the Iskander-K OTRK, R-500 cruise missiles can be used, the firing range of which, according to some statements, exceeds 2500 km The R-500 is a more modern version of the Soviet 3M10 Grenade Accordingly, "Accounting" will be different. (The picture shows the launch of the p-500 2007)
                  2. -DGELAL AD-DIN-
                    -DGELAL AD-DIN- April 27 2013 22: 41 New
                    -14
                    On the deployment of nuclear weapons by Russia in Belarus V.V. PUTIN - never will and this fact must be recognized boldly!
                    1. Retx
                      Retx April 28 2013 10: 40 New
                      +6
                      It will do so in order not to reduce or dispose of it under a contract with amers. They will give everything to the Republic.
                      1. Kostya pedestrian
                        Kostya pedestrian April 28 2013 14: 06 New
                        0
                        Russia should not be scattered with a nuclear weapon, but to create possible bridgeheads for the rapid deployment of nuclear strategic weapons in Belarus would be a good idea.

                        And there it’s possible to conduct exercises with the attraction of Russian nuclear weapons and nuclear weapons to Belarus, for example, when NATO exercises are in full swing in the Baltic or in Poland.
                    2. Akhtuba73
                      Akhtuba73 April 28 2013 15: 24 New
                      +2
                      Dgelal
                      Vladimir Putin - never will ...
                      More and more convinced that nothing just happens in Putin’s politics. And dad is not casual is a "blurted out." Do not think badly about these people. The caravan goes on, let the pugs bark now. I applaud standing up to such a decision!
                      1. -DGELAL AD-DIN-
                        -DGELAL AD-DIN- April 28 2013 18: 35 New
                        -6
                        Before making such loud statements, you need to understand the essence of the history of the collapse of the USSR!
                        In addition, to delve into the relationship between Belarus and Russia!
                        Currently, the Old Man feels a real threat to his power from the West, in addition, in relations with Russia, he is constantly bargaining!
                        In other words, he wants to eat a fish and to x .. sit down!
                        The placement of weapons of mass destruction on the territory of Belarus is not permissible!
                        This will be a big mistake in the foreign policy of V.V. Putin!
                        At present, Russia is not the USSR and is not ready to repel real threats from NATO.
                        In addition, the country's economy is in decline, and the military-industrial complex is collapsed, just like the army and navy!
                    3. v53993
                      v53993 April 29 2013 13: 09 New
                      0
                      Will not go V.V. Putin - Russia will go.
                  3. Jurkovs
                    Jurkovs April 28 2013 17: 43 New
                    +1
                    Something I do not believe this little scheme. It has been repeatedly stated that the Iskanders not only cover their missile defense positions in Poland, but also the locator in the Czech Republic. But according to the shemka this is not visible.
                  4. NauruS
                    NauruS April 28 2013 20: 05 New
                    0
                    it is easier to reach Germany from Kaliningrad than from Belarus it is visible on your map, but as for the fact that it is possible to threaten the Czechs and other Europeans from the territory of Belarus, it seems to me that it is easier to increase the range of Iskander missiles !! in your drawing, an area of ​​500 km is indicated, and who said that rockets cannot be used, for example, with a range of 1000 km or more!
                    1. JIaIIoTb
                      JIaIIoTb 3 May 2013 09: 35 New
                      +1
                      The probability of survival of the complexes is higher if they are in 2 different directions. It is more difficult to reflect a blow from 2 different directions.
                      Sincerely.
                  5. edge
                    edge 2 May 2013 16: 14 New
                    +1
                    Quote: Kaa
                    The Europeans do not know the proverb "Do not be wicked while it is quiet"?
                    more than 3 centuries of experience in communicating with Russians in Europe did not give anything, although they repeatedly stood .... in front of our divisions. Probably should have been tougher to deal with them .........
              2. eagle11
                eagle11 April 28 2013 09: 12 New
                +2
                Here are just a "pioneer" in the USSR ceased to exist (like all BRSD), there was a good complex. Now he has been revived in China, under the name "Dongfeng-25."
          2. AndreyAB
            AndreyAB April 28 2013 16: 53 New
            0
            To a very large extent, yes, well, for example, Serdyukov - if there is no stone tossed at me.
      2. Vashestambid
        Vashestambid April 27 2013 18: 58 New
        -51
        Quote: Captain Vrungel
        The cold war never ended

        It ended, the Russians lost it, forgot? fool

        Pursue Belarus here journalism cooked porridge from not what !! smile
        1. Thunderbolt
          Thunderbolt April 27 2013 19: 29 New
          31
          Quote: VashEstambid
          someone does not want to be friends with the Russians !!
          So there was an agreement with NATO: Don’t take up the East European sandbox, don’t impose sanctions! Again, is the Russish to blame? Learn to keep the word so that we don’t use the case stop
          1. Kolya
            Kolya April 27 2013 20: 13 New
            12
            US guarantees are not guarantees at all, they are a means of information warfare. No need to be naive!
            1. Alex Nick
              Alex Nick April 27 2013 22: 49 New
              15
              Is US Warranties a New Joke?
        2. ramzes1776
          ramzes1776 April 27 2013 19: 47 New
          13
          Quote: VashEstambid
          Quote: Captain Vrungel
          The cold war never ended

          It ended, the Russians lost it, forgot?

          This is something someone wanted to see. In fact, as long as Russia is there, the war with the “West” has been ongoing and will continue.
        3. smile
          smile April 27 2013 21: 50 New
          20
          Vashestambid
          History shows. that your winners never stop ... for centuries the algorithm has been the same - the Cold War, concessions on our part, the final rupture of the gay people and their coming to visit us, burying another horde of conquerors on our territory, our coming to visit them ... some time they sit, impressed, like a mouse under a broom ... the algorithm does not change, now the only difference is that despite our temporary weakening, they finally realized that we no longer need to go to us - there is a lot of land, a couple enough for everyone ..... the concessions are already over, so that your joy is somewhat premature.
        4. Raiven
          Raiven April 27 2013 22: 31 New
          +4
          come out satan stop
        5. piotr534
          piotr534 April 28 2013 03: 00 New
          +2
          Where did you get so competent for our joy from? It’s immediately obvious that it’s not Russian, there are 9 errors in 4 sentences, it’s necessary, so try. Thank you, from the bottom of my heart neighing.
          1. Raiven
            Raiven 25 May 2013 03: 00 New
            0
            you just do it to whom?
        6. Gecko
          Gecko April 28 2013 16: 24 New
          0
          And who is on friendly terms with amers? Do they have friends? Or maybe all the same vassals.
        7. luka095
          luka095 April 28 2013 18: 20 New
          +1
          Any war ends. But this does not mean that after its completion the situation is mothballed. A new cycle always begins. And in this new cycle, new wars begin, with altered goals. It’s another matter that our “partners” in the West are humbling - I always want more ...
          And why out of nothing? The claims of the Old Man are justified and he voiced them. Threw, so to speak, a ball on the opponents' field ...
        8. The comment was deleted.
        9. The comment was deleted.
      3. Vadivak
        Vadivak April 27 2013 21: 14 New
        11
        Quote: Captain Vrungel
        "Three states - Great Britain, Russia and the USA - have committed themselves to respect the independence and sovereignty of Belarus, including not to apply measures of economic coercion"


        They promised us not to spread NATO east, how did we respond? correctly unilaterally reduced nuclear weapons, well, maybe the Old Man has enough of their promises not to believe, he has children like in Belarusian schools
      4. svp67
        svp67 April 28 2013 02: 34 New
        +4
        Quote: Captain Vrungel
        The Cold War never ended. We just rushed to capitalism. To celebrate, we put on pink glasses and let's jump for the joy of becoming pink and fluffy with them. The enemy is cunning and treacherous. Gunpowder must always be kept dry.


        In general, the very fact that the world again “spoke” about nuclear weapons cannot but upset. Iran, DPRK, now Belarus ... It is time for the "perestroika politicians" to understand that their ideas about the onset of the "era of prosperity", as soon as the USSR disarm, failed completely. In the world they reckon only with those who are able to stand up for themselves. And in this regard, I perfectly understand the Belarusian leader, but still nuclear weapons are a very "expensive toy" and should they "acquire" them ... I think that in this regard it would be better if the leadership of our countries acted more cohesively and finally, it took effective steps to create a single state. And in the end, it’s time to conduct an offensive "information war" so that as many people in the world as possible know about the development of events from our point of view, otherwise I would not be surprised if the "rabid persecution of Belarus" that was recently launched in the West erupted against North Korea and Iran ...
      5. edge
        edge 2 May 2013 16: 07 New
        0
        Quote: Captain Vrungel
        The enemy is cunning and treacherous.
        this is a well-known truth: treachery, deceit, hatred, garden
        ism, double-dealing and evil greed are the essence of the Western European herd calling itself civilization ......
    2. Russian
      Russian April 27 2013 16: 54 New
      30
      I agree, the old man does everything right! And we need to become a united state for a long time, and let Europe also eat ties from fear)
      1. Genur
        Genur April 27 2013 21: 56 New
        +9
        For at least one five-year period to Russia Old Man ...
        1. Jarilo
          Jarilo April 28 2013 08: 54 New
          +5
          Quote: Genur
          For at least one five-year period to Russia Old Man ...

          Yes, Old Man is a "master"! It would be great for the country, for the people.
          But will Putin still have a place on the political Olympus? I think he will not allow this.
    3. Thunderbolt
      Thunderbolt April 27 2013 16: 56 New
      +6
      On the expanses of the former USSR, only the Russian units of the Strategic Missile Forces, for that matter. In the existing format of our interstate relations, IMHO_IMHO_IMHO --- only SO. (Do not give a "bomb", develop cooperation drinks )
      1. Sibiryak
        Sibiryak April 27 2013 17: 37 New
        +4
        Quote: Thunderbolt
        In the existing format of our interstate relations, IMHO_IMHO_IMHO --- only SO. (Do not give a "bomb", develop cooperation

        I think in Belarus it (the bomb) has already existed for a very long time!
        1. Thunderbolt
          Thunderbolt April 27 2013 17: 46 New
          +1
          Quote: Sibiryak
          In Belarus, it (the bomb) has already existed for a very long time!
          In the Belarusian army?
          1. Sibiryak
            Sibiryak April 27 2013 17: 51 New
            +1
            Quote: Thunderbolt
            In the Belarusian army?

            Yes
            1. SASCHAmIXEEW
              SASCHAmIXEEW April 27 2013 19: 16 New
              0
              Well, thank God!!! Only a button in Moscow!
        2. Bashkaus
          Bashkaus April 27 2013 18: 47 New
          +2
          Sorry, the statement about the existence of a bomb in Belarus is very serious.
          What is it based on?
          I do not hide the fact that I would be glad if this is so.
          1. Sibiryak
            Sibiryak April 27 2013 19: 29 New
            +5
            Quote: Bashkaus
            Sorry, the statement about the existence of a bomb in Belarus is very serious.

            I did not claim, but suggested saying - I think.
            Quote: Bashkaus
            What is it based on?

            Only in my subjective opinion. It takes a lot of time to develop and create a nuclear warhead from scratch, and speaking about it in advance, to put it mildly, is not very smart, as they will seek and there will be a lot of noise, not to mention the means of nuclear weapons delivery. Therefore, making such statements, Belarus only confirms the fact of the presence of nuclear weapons, but Russia will apparently help with the delivery vehicles, as one of the options is the appearance of a Russian air regiment on the territory of Belarus.
            Quote: Bashkaus
            I do not hide the fact that I would be glad if this is so.

            I, too!
    4. 11 black
      11 black April 27 2013 18: 34 New
      +6
      Quote: GreatRussia
      European cultural state surrounded by the criminal organization of NATO ....

      golden words + good and as for the treaty, the United States never considered binding the agreements it concluded itself - hence the question of the meaning of demanding legal guarantees from them regarding missile defense, but this is another topic. And the appearance of nuclear weapons in Belarus was a matter of time since Poland and the Czech Republic agreed to deliver American missiles at their place, which they wanted and received ...
      1. SASCHAmIXEEW
        SASCHAmIXEEW April 27 2013 19: 39 New
        +7
        Yes, it's all blah blah blah, just for whom? Stalin and the West already had a non-aggression pact, and what happened !? In the West, whoever dominates is a Yid-Zionist money bag, where the main thing is a freebie, it was not in vain that the Jews came up with a loan interest! The fact that the Yankees are under the hood of a moisha is what our Zhirik will say ... no doubt no one! Only their people do not doubt it He doesn’t know, their brains are too powdered with laws that were invented by the Jews in power!
      2. piotr534
        piotr534 April 28 2013 03: 14 New
        +1
        Not a big amendment, the Czechs wanted to put a radar at home, but then the amers changed their minds and the Czechs were left with nothing.
    5. Nick
      Nick April 27 2013 18: 38 New
      +2
      Quote: GreatRussia
      surrounded by the criminal organization of NATO

      To the Point! good
    6. Manager
      Manager April 27 2013 18: 58 New
      +4
      Quote: GreatRussia
      some Pakistan has nuclear weapons.


      And Pakistan and Israel, Mad Korea seems to have! A civilized Belarus is generally a continuation of Russia. So God himself commanded!
      1. Ruslan67
        Ruslan67 April 27 2013 20: 18 New
        +4
        Quote: Manager
        ! A civilized Belarus is generally a continuation of Russia. So God himself commanded!

        In general, we are just a Union State. It is enough to place the Russian one and all request
      2. edge
        edge 2 May 2013 16: 24 New
        0
        Quote: Manager
        And Pakistan and Israel, Mad Korea seems to have! A civilized Belarus is generally a continuation of Russia
        and mine for the missiles saved .... there will be a team-deployed systems in years.
    7. brelok
      brelok April 28 2013 06: 47 New
      +3
      Quote: GreatRussia
      And here is a European cultural state surrounded by the criminal organization of NATO ....
      God himself commanded.

      at 95 Lukashenko correctly said in our division of the Strategic Missile Forces Mozyr: “If you leave, the Americans will come.” He was against the conclusion and seemed to be right!
    8. mch1950
      mch1950 April 28 2013 20: 12 New
      +1
      To quit the contract and possession of nuclear weapons is not the same thing.
  2. dark_65
    dark_65 April 27 2013 16: 43 New
    +8
    The real contender for the post of president of the Russian Federation.
    1. TekhnarMAF
      TekhnarMAF April 27 2013 17: 15 New
      10
      I AM FOR! But in the beginning we should become a single state. Alas, hopes for PUs became a bluff! Can Old Man take Russia under his wing, huh? This is White Russia, i.e. clean, well, and we, under its auspices, will also be cleaned?
      1. Nitup
        Nitup April 27 2013 17: 37 New
        0
        Do not exaggerate, if not for Russia and Putin, Lukashenko would have been much quieter. He is not
      2. Nitup
        Nitup April 27 2013 17: 40 New
        +4
        Do not exaggerate, if not for Russia and Putin, Lukashenko would have been much quieter. He is not stupid.
        1. lecturer
          lecturer April 28 2013 09: 52 New
          +2
          Nitup:

          “Do not exaggerate, if not for Russia and Putin, Lukashenko would have been much quieter. He’s not stupid.”

          Well said! We are all BROTHERS !, BUT !, have already agreed to the presidency of Lukashenko (!) YES! - AGREED! Forgetting the most important thing, ALL OUR Presidents ARE ON HIS POST! ..... And I don’t even want to add a “theme” if Lukashenko leaves Belarus (for us as president!).
      3. Heccrbq
        Heccrbq April 27 2013 18: 23 New
        13
        Our elite will never allow Old Man to power in Russia, he will do anything, but he will never allow it!
        1. Bashkaus
          Bashkaus April 27 2013 18: 51 New
          10
          Why do we need to ask the elite? the people are WE!
          I also think more and more that Old Man would be a good leader of the Union State.
          But what makes me most happy is that other people began to voice these thoughts in the ears.
          1. Gecko
            Gecko April 28 2013 16: 32 New
            0
            And what's new, in the USSR, the leaders were mostly not Russian:

            Lenin is a Jew
            Stalin - Georgian
            Khrushchev - from Ukraine, although Russian, he spoke a good language and walked in an embroidered shirt
            Brezhnev - Ukrainian
            Andropov is a Jew
            Chernenko - Ukrainian
            Gorbachev - Ukrainian by mother
  3. VohaAhov
    VohaAhov April 27 2013 16: 46 New
    -32
    If Belarus withdraws from the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) and places a nuclear weapon on its territory, then it will automatically enter the lists of rogue states (such as North Korea), with all the ensuing consequences. I hope Lukashenko joked or just wanted to earn "points".
    1. Sibiryak
      Sibiryak April 27 2013 17: 01 New
      26
      Quote: VohaAhov
      If Belarus withdraws from the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) and places a nuclear weapon on its territory, then it will automatically enter the lists of rogue states (such as North Korea), with all the ensuing consequences.

      You say the country is an outcast, and now you can think of Belarus with champagne at the Brudershaft and they laze with great love until they lose consciousness, don’t make people laugh! The United States is no longer seriously considering this treaty at all, and you say Lukashenko wanted to joke!
    2. vlad767
      vlad767 April 27 2013 17: 13 New
      +8
      And now, from the west, shouts will begin about "militarism in Belarus and dictator Lukashenko threatening the civilized world." But I do not think that Belarus will remain in isolation. Well, maybe from the west.
    3. DPN
      DPN April 27 2013 18: 27 New
      +6
      Belarus is the western outpost of Russia, and it will not be any outcast, in extreme cases, until Russia throws it, like the KUBU, and others.
      1. SASCHAmIXEEW
        SASCHAmIXEEW April 27 2013 19: 46 New
        10
        Cuba and others, as you put it, were not thrown by RUSSIA, but by the liquid-Zionist elite who is in power, she and the Russian people have thrown, according to the accounts, some who wake up to pay ... it's not yet evening!
    4. 46bob46
      46bob46 April 27 2013 22: 08 New
      0
      press the buttons flush to see how and by whom Belarus is bound by military treaties.
  4. Thunderbolt
    Thunderbolt April 27 2013 16: 50 New
    10
    Recently, there was a statement, it seems, by the US Embassy in Belarus, that the USA does not consider this Memorandum as a binding document, "************************* What about guarantees of non-proliferation of NATO to the east, gentlemen, “partners”? I remember everything am In the speeches of Western politicians justifying the rampant expansion of NATO's scope of action, the assertion is constantly made that moving the alliance to the Russian borders does not pose any threat, but rather “aims to strengthen peace” However, in order to assess the true value of such assurances, one must remember the fate of other solemn promises and oaths given by the leaders of NATO countries at the end of the 80s of the 1989th century. Then, at the meetings of the alliance leaders with the first and last President of the USSR Gorbachev, the question of unification of Germany and the upcoming dissolution of the Warsaw Pact alliance were discussed. The former USSR president was given “firm guarantees” of NATO’s non-proliferation in Eastern Europe. In order not to be unfounded, we will cite the testimony of the former Prime Minister of the Russian government Yevgeny Primakov that in 1990-XNUMX. the leadership of the USSR on the part of the leaders of the leading Western states was given unequivocal assurances that if the Soviet Union authorized the union of the FRG and the German Democratic Republic, NATO would not expand its scope of operations to the east.
    Read more: http://www.km.ru/glavnoe/2006/07/27/kommentarii-dnya/rasshirenie-nato-na-vostok-
    sozdaet-ugrozu-rossii
  5. krpmlws
    krpmlws April 27 2013 16: 59 New
    16
    Quote: VohaAhov
    If Belarus withdraws from the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) and places a nuclear weapon on its territory, then it will automatically enter the lists of rogue states (such as North Korea), with all the ensuing consequences. I hope Lukashenko joked or just wanted to earn "points".

    It’s better that the West calculates the consequences for itself (((Lukashenko, well done. The West is used to playing with one goal, but it looks like time passes by.
  6. kind
    kind April 27 2013 16: 59 New
    29
    Belarusians like me! Simple, hardworking, beautiful and peaceful people! I also like that they have no envy! Old Man they have the right man. I respect you. We must always be together. Still, Ukraine would turn to face us, and there you look and the rest will come to their senses.
    1. Hudo
      Hudo April 27 2013 17: 30 New
      +7
      Quote: Good
      Still, Ukraine would turn to face us, and there you look and the rest will come to their senses.


      For this, it would be worth Russia to turn to the Russian people living there, at least in terms of information. So far, I have given everything in this matter, nothing at all, everything has been left to the local eurointegrators and Svidomites, their mother is by the foot.
      1. SASCHAmIXEEW
        SASCHAmIXEEW April 27 2013 20: 03 New
        +5
        And in RUSSIA all the media are in the hands of the liquidationists, so you are not, we are not good from these media except blackthorn with porn and gloss with blueness we won’t see !!! If a revolution happens in RUSSIA, then without the Jews at the head and against the Zhidozionists !!!!
        1. Hudo
          Hudo April 27 2013 20: 17 New
          +4
          Quote: SASCHAmIXEEW
          And in RUSSIA all the media are in the hands of the liquidationists, so you are not, we are not good from these media except blackthorn with porn and gloss with blueness we won’t see !!! If a revolution happens in RUSSIA, then without the Jews at the head and against the Zhidozionists !!!!

          How much the rope does not curl, and the end for the liquidationists seems sad.
      2. kind
        kind April 27 2013 22: 15 New
        +5
        We already didn’t give a damn about each other’s souls, it’s time to change our minds. Now our main task is to make friends of our children who do not know how we lived together in the USSR. For our children, our future !!!
      3. 30143
        30143 April 28 2013 08: 35 New
        +3
        No, do not wait. This Friday, Savik Schuster on Inter Channel did everything to convince the country that more than 71% want European values ​​(fagots and lesbians). Here we have to do as with Tajikistan ...
    2. wheel
      wheel April 27 2013 18: 45 New
      +8
      I, like Belarus, are pleased to hear such words about my people. But about the right man, I don’t need to initialize. We are good, but also all nonsense above the roof.
      1. Egoza
        Egoza April 27 2013 19: 48 New
        +8
        Quote: kolesik
        .but about the right man, you don’t need to initialize. We have something good, but also any nonsense above the roof.

        Victor! Of course, you know better on the spot, but we also have someone to compare with. Therefore (from Ukraine) the comparison in favor of the Old Man is +++++ 100000000! And your people are wonderful!
      2. kind
        kind April 27 2013 22: 31 New
        +2
        Well, that's fine. In any state, everyone cannot be happy with everything, but in a good country (as a rule) there are more satisfied !!!
      3. kind
        kind April 27 2013 22: 40 New
        +1
        There is so much good written about A. Lukashenko, but is there still such a leader in the world that he is so supported? !!
    3. Bashkaus
      Bashkaus April 27 2013 18: 56 New
      22
      We turn Ukraine to face us, for this I take a small step, in the summer I will marry a Ukrainian!
      So all questions will disappear by themselves: we are fraternal peoples, our strength is in unity, and those who are against are simply blue.
      1. afire
        afire April 27 2013 19: 28 New
        +4
        Congratulations, konesh early, but still)
        piiiiiiiii .. you mean))
  7. Alexander Romanov
    Alexander Romanov April 27 2013 17: 04 New
    +9
    Brussels will be delighted at this turn of events laughing Although they themselves have become hostages of their own ambitions, or maybe they just don’t get smarter request
  8. vlad767
    vlad767 April 27 2013 17: 07 New
    +2
    Well, that’s it, now from the west, shouts will begin about "militarism and dictator Lukashenko threatening the civilized world."
  9. Chicot 1
    Chicot 1 April 27 2013 17: 14 New
    18
    And let not only declare this opportunity, but also become a nuclear power in practice. And let my opinion on this subject be purely subjective, but personally I don’t see anything bad about it ...
    Moreover, if any kind of unstable riffraff like Pakistan has nuclear weapons, then why can’t they own Belarus? .. Of course, the West will be strangled for a while by this huge and pimply toad. But it’s okay - it will wheeze and calm down over time ... Not the first and not the last time ...
  10. VadimSt
    VadimSt April 27 2013 17: 15 New
    15
    Quote: krpmlws
    Let the West calculate for itself the consequences
    \
    + That's right. Belarus has a fairly reliable partner, represented by Russia, therefore both the statement and the possible fact of concrete actions are purely political in nature. But one cannot be silent, and here Lukashenko is right.
  11. Nursultan
    Nursultan April 27 2013 17: 15 New
    +6
    I wonder what ours will do. Will the old canned mines be returned.
    1. VadimSt
      VadimSt April 27 2013 17: 31 New
      +7
      Ukraine, Belarus and Kazakhstan voluntarily refused to participate in the nuclear club, no one forced them, did not force them and did not block them with sanctions, I think that with certain external threats, nothing will prevent them from ensuring their safety with this component. International treaties and obligations in the hands of the West are increasingly becoming fictitious, and not everyone wants to reckon with this.
      1. Hudo
        Hudo April 27 2013 17: 38 New
        +6
        As for Ukraine, do not get excited. While Svidomo-fascists, with the complicity of the current Gauleiter Yanukovych, are eager for power, there is not enough nuclear weapons in the hands of the Natsiks, and they are dreaming of it (nuclear weapons) to its full potential.

        http://rian.com.ua/dossier/20121019/336108858.html
        ".. Termination of Ukraine’s participation in the CIS, visa regime with Russia, the country's nuclear status, arming of the army with tactical nuclear weapons ..."

        Do you need it?
      2. Misantrop
        Misantrop April 27 2013 20: 41 New
        +4
        Quote: VadimSt
        Ukraine, Belarus and Kazakhstan voluntarily refused to participate in a nuclear club, no one forced them, did not force them and did not block them with sanctions
        Recently I talked with the guys who were just serving the storage and preparation systems for the UPS at the time of the collapse of the USSR. They shared interesting information. According to them, NOBODY from the sovereign republics has refused to abandon nuclear weapons in any way. It’s just that at the time of the collapse they found themselves in the arsenals instead of war blocks weight and size models. So they had to squeeze the most out of this interesting situation ...
        1. Kaa
          Kaa April 27 2013 22: 35 New
          +6
          Quote: Misantrop
          at the time of the collapse, they had mass-size models instead of warheads in their arsenals.
          An interesting hr is obtained ... This only confirms the NON-RANDOMITY of the dismantling of the USSR. And back in those years, I thought that something hit us, Kravchuk bargained a little for Ukrainian warheads, and there was even a massive explanation in the media that we could not reprogram ourselves without Moscow. In those years, it was related to the Russian Chemical Plant, engineers said that this is utter nonsense, everything that is password protected can be cracked. Hmmm ... information for consideration, thanks, it turns out, the regional princes played "a pair of twos" ...
        2. Jarilo
          Jarilo April 28 2013 09: 21 New
          +2
          Quote: Misantrop
          at the time of the collapse, they had mass-size models instead of warheads in their arsenals.

          Maybe it is so. Nevertheless, in Ukraine, Kazakhstan and Belarus, most of the Strategic Missile Forces infrastructure has been preserved, and in which case, missile divisions from Russia can be returned to their former locations. I myself served in the late 80s in the Lida division of the Strategic Missile Forces (Belarus) on the "Topol". Yes, nuclear weapons are evil, but this is an inevitable evil in the modern world. Unfortunately, our sworn friends understand only power. Now is a good time to restore the "status quo", I hope the Old Man will not miss it, and Russia will help.
          1. Misantrop
            Misantrop April 28 2013 16: 40 New
            +1
            Quote: Yarylo
            in Ukraine, Kazakhstan and Belarus, preserved most of the strategic missile forces infrastructure
            I don’t know about Kazakhstan, in Belarus it’s quite possible, but in Ukraine there is NO HORRY. Everything is blown up and sawn, and the remnants are looted. And - for a long time. So to create "from scratch" now would be cheaper, faster and easier than trying to recover what was lost ...
          2. Stalinets
            Stalinets April 29 2013 02: 45 New
            0
            In Ukraine ? It’s you who got excited ..... There, the Shilohombrity destroyed everything that could be. yes
  12. AleksUkr
    AleksUkr April 27 2013 17: 16 New
    +7
    2008 »March» 22 »Belarus restores its nuclear status

    The situation resembles the beginning of a new Caribbean crisis. As a result of the Caribbean crisis, the United States was forced to endure Cubans then in Africa, Latin America, even in Vietnam.
    Unless if someone in the United States just such a crisis development in Europe is now necessary.

    http://www.preemniki.ru/

    THIS PROCESS IS NOT STARTED TODAY. AND WHAT EVERYTHING ARE ACCOMPLISHED? WEST NEVER FULFILLED WITH ITS SAME OBLIGATIONS. Are we redheads? EVERYTHING CAN BE!! ...
  13. WIN969
    WIN969 April 27 2013 17: 26 New
    +5
    Amer, do not anger the old man, otherwise Khan!
  14. APASUS
    APASUS April 27 2013 17: 26 New
    +2
    Lukashenko in the West has always been considered an outcast! And whether or not Belarus acquires nuclear weapons, its and country's status will not change! Another thing, why is this information outburst?
    What are his goals?
  15. GreatRussia
    GreatRussia April 27 2013 17: 37 New
    +8
    Quote: Nursultan
    I wonder what ours will do. Will the old canned mines be returned.


    Restore BZHRK and start them including the route Russia - Belarus!
    1. Alikovo
      Alikovo April 27 2013 19: 01 New
      +5
      I agree, you can let the club go.
    2. SASCHAmIXEEW
      SASCHAmIXEEW April 27 2013 20: 19 New
      +2
      BZHRK almost restored, and somewhere I read, with a different filling, lighter, but no less formidable! What is the way (by weight) for all railway former republics of the USSR!
      1. tomas.09
        tomas.09 April 28 2013 09: 43 New
        +1
        Yes BZHRK is no longer relevant. Club K is. Put and carry on whatever container you want !!!!
  16. Ulysses
    Ulysses April 27 2013 17: 39 New
    +6
    I am only FOR the status of Belarus as a nuclear power
    A dozen nuclear warheads with carriers will greatly reduce the rhetoric of its aggressive neighbors.

    The question is that it was easier to take out nuclear weapons than they would now get hold of them. winked
  17. jagdpanzer
    jagdpanzer April 27 2013 17: 39 New
    +2
    where will they get the nuclear weapons? Russia is unlikely to lend, but I think it’s possible to place
  18. artist-mamluk
    artist-mamluk April 27 2013 17: 58 New
    +8
    Old Man is beautiful, he sent all tries. It is important not whether they will have nuclear weapons or not, it is important that there is a great opportunity to receive it. And this is a nightmare for all who sow the Sanskrit.
  19. Deathterrorists
    Deathterrorists April 27 2013 18: 04 New
    +3
    Belarus has always been a fairly progressive country and I think nuclear weapons will not stop them. Placing our missiles there and the whole west will live in fear and lick the US ass - Help us, democration is broken! smile
    1. Egoza
      Egoza April 27 2013 18: 17 New
      +4
      Quote: DeathTerrorists
      and the whole west will live in fear

      That's it! Let them spend money on defense and their army ... in a crisis - that's it. We are not the first to climb, but fear has big eyes.
  20. d.gksueyjd
    d.gksueyjd April 27 2013 18: 29 New
    +7
    Belarus does not lose anything from deploying nuclear weapons on its territory, but the status in the world will significantly increase it. Some “lost” states should think that they become hostages to US (NATO) policies, and now they will not be able to “slip through”. The deployment of NATO troops in their territories clearly puts them on a par with the aggressor in order to receive a nuclear strike. It is time for Poland and the like to think about the consequences of an aggressive policy towards the Russian Federation. If NATO expands to the "east", then Russia will gradually restore good-neighborly, friendly relations with the former republics of the USSR!
  21. f0rest3r
    f0rest3r April 27 2013 18: 38 New
    +3
    News, so news. Poor Europe, now they’ll tear their asses together with amers.
  22. Bashkaus
    Bashkaus April 27 2013 18: 43 New
    21
    Give dad a hug and kiss (do not consider it blue). Today, in another topic, I accidentally remembered that back in the 90s Lukashenko ordered the conservation of mines with the words "useful for storing potatoes." And then suddenly the news is this.
    Let's, let's go to the mattress covers, push on Old Man, we can only do it.
    Atoms, as I understood Belarusians, are like dirt, MAZ-based tractors themselves do it, and only competent people from the Russian Federation will probably not part-time earn extra money at local research institutes. You see six months later, the Belovezhskaya Pushcha missile system will stand on alert on an independent Belarus basis, so what, that looks like 1: 1 to Topol-M, what an unknown, out of the blue, the Chinese will shamelessly compromise technology, so God himself ordered.
    And then the fun begins:
    Although Belarus is an allied state with anmi, it is independent, and therefore is not included in the START-3 treaty, so how much and what they rivet there (before that, “carefully stole” our technology), we don’t care, we are for them not in the answer!
    Then you can crank the same thing with Kazakhstan, you look, and Ukraine will be tempted, times are now terrible, if you are afraid, it is better together, but!
    TOGETHER - WE ARE FORCE!
    1. d.gksueyjd
      d.gksueyjd April 27 2013 21: 03 New
      +3
      Alas, this cannot happen with Kazakhstan - the mines are blown up and the infrastructure is destroyed!
      Quote: Bashkaus
      Then the same thing can be turned with Kazakhstan,

      Ukraine is a separate conversation and its rapprochement with the Russian Federation is very doubtful!
      1. kind
        kind April 27 2013 22: 23 New
        +6
        Ukraine is a separate conversation and its rapprochement with the Russian Federation is very doubtful!

        This is you in vain. Do not confuse the people of Ukraine and its government!
        1. edge
          edge 2 May 2013 16: 38 New
          0
          Quote: d.gksueyjd
          Ukraine is a separate conversation and its rapprochement with the Russian Federation is very doubtful!
          hetmans will come to us only when they are pressed tightly, which was the place to be
      2. MG42
        MG42 April 28 2013 19: 41 New
        +4
        Quote: d.gksueyjd
        Ukraine is a separate conversation and its rapprochement with the Russian Federation is very doubtful!

        Yes, Yanukovych’s course is now really aimed at signing an association agreement with the EU, moreover, the EU no longer insists on Tymoshenko’s release from prison, with the customs union we have limited ourselves to observer status.
    2. botur
      botur April 27 2013 22: 30 New
      +5
      a photo
      The item is located near Smorgon.
      The place was abandoned by the military after Belarus abandoned nuclear weapons.
      1. botur
        botur April 27 2013 23: 06 New
        +3
        a photoa photo
        Top mine.
        1. MG42
          MG42 April 28 2013 19: 37 New
          +5
          Judging by the photo, it’s no longer possible to reanimate these objects, except to build new mines or focus on mobile complexes.
          Ukraine stepped on the same rake, abandoning its nuclear potential in exchange for 3-way phantom security guarantees, its potential was second in the republics of the USSR after Russia.
          By the way, if the union state of Russia + Belarus really functioned, then these legal formalities could be circumvented without breaking anything and renewed as a unified state-state to extend the nuclear status to the entire territory, but Putin and Lukashenko will not decide who the president will be then?
  23. DPN
    DPN April 27 2013 18: 45 New
    +5
    The main thing to warn, and missiles from Russia will fly where necessary, from the territory of Belarus.
    The elite of states has not yet found a place where it can sit out after a mutual nuclear strike, which means everything will be quiet and peaceful. In general, the Old Man says correctly, do not scare the hell yourself get in the face.
  24. andrejwz
    andrejwz April 27 2013 18: 58 New
    +4
    and embittered rhetoric against the West from Russia.

    The author did not confuse Russia with the West. From the West, Russia directly has a choral screech on all registers.
  25. jagdpanzer
    jagdpanzer April 27 2013 19: 16 New
    +3
    Quote: Bashkaus
    "useful for storing potatoes"
    tin! laughing good
  26. waisson
    waisson April 27 2013 19: 25 New
    11
    The Old Man is not touched, I have the word Old Man in Belarus, the whole status of the contract will be respected; everything will be fine, but if they’re hooked and hooked already, the Old Man said the Old Man did it. I served in Belarus where there are so many kind, unselfish friendly people I haven’t seen what order they have housing and communal services sphere and in all departments there is a complete order. to be afraid because he is sitting far away. we would have such an FATHER
    1. SergBrNord
      SergBrNord 3 May 2013 20: 13 New
      0
      My friend, not everything is as rosy as I wanted. Problems with housing and communal services / bureaucrats / the rest are akin to Russian, only the tradition of "peratrahivaniya" is present. But only - when baked, and often - without much use.
  27. nikolas 83
    nikolas 83 April 27 2013 19: 45 New
    +5
    What kind of power is this with us? We’ll take it and unite with Belarus. And so the air base will already be there. Put an even larger radar station so that everything can be jammed up to the Atlantic. And I will distribute a mobile missile system with ICBMs. wink
  28. shurup
    shurup April 27 2013 19: 57 New
    +6
    A good trump card to remove sanctions and remove lists against the Russian Federation and Belarus.
    Before Iran, the Americans clearly did not expect such dirty tricks, and even in their favorite manner.
    But their return move will be disgusting.
    1. Hudo
      Hudo April 27 2013 20: 12 New
      +5
      Quote: shurup
      A good trump card to remove sanctions and remove lists against the Russian Federation and Belarus.
      Before Iran, the Americans clearly did not expect such dirty tricks, and even in their favorite manner.
      But their return move will be disgusting.


      Old Man has nowhere to retreat. We will hold his fists for him.
    2. Misantrop
      Misantrop April 27 2013 20: 47 New
      +4
      Quote: shurup
      But their return move will be disgusting.
      Alas, they never followed the sequence of moves. And I don’t remember something “good” among them, just an abomination. So you should not expect anything new in terms of pleasantness from them, there has never been such a thing ...
  29. UFO
    UFO April 27 2013 20: 10 New
    +3
    Yes, Belarus needs to be given nuclear weapons, a kind of "trump card" for "negotiations." The adequacy of the Old Man is beyond doubt, which can not be said about the neighboring Poles. Poland has recently been rearming, they wanted EuroPRO to host "saber-toothed honorics", let them know how Old Man can "pile on" if that. wink
  30. Ivan.
    Ivan. April 27 2013 20: 55 New
    +1
    embittered rhetoric addressed to the West from Russia.
    Author Maxim Schweitz

    Well, how do you understand this?
  31. Krasnoyarsk
    Krasnoyarsk April 27 2013 21: 02 New
    +4
    I am 100% sure that Lukashenko hid a couple of warheads.
    1. Sergey S.
      Sergey S. April 27 2013 21: 15 New
      +5
      Why compose fairy tales?
      You can hide a warhead only with the consent of a large list of defendants.
      So, if there are nuclear munitions on the territory of Belarus, then, with a probability of 9 nines, Russia hid this ...

      But Belarus has enough scientific and production forces to create a nuclear warhead. I’m not sure that this can happen very quickly, but if the program is included in the nuclear club will be accepted, Belarus will fulfill it.
  32. 1goose3
    1goose3 April 27 2013 21: 08 New
    +4
    Quote: VashEstambid
    It ended, the Russians lost it, forgot?


    Didn’t I eat too much food, what is the feces boiling about in you? We stopped the war, the cold, to put it mildly, naivety of some of our leaders, but you, snickering, didn’t. Lost the stage, lost the USSR, but Russia then lives, despite your attempts to fart, it does not just live, but has risen and is gaining strength. Unlike you. You still have to fall and not the fact that Shishia will survive. Symptoms on the face, after a maximum of 15-20 years, we will laugh together. Judging by the events, the last, you have already begun to pohahat there. hi
  33. 1goose3
    1goose3 April 27 2013 21: 22 New
    +2
    Will Lukashenko get the nuclear weapons that he has been dreaming of for a long time, in the next few years, will depend only on Russia.

    Yes, it will. Or maybe it already has, just without ads. Belarus is the only absolutely reliable ally of Russia, and then think for yourself. bully
  34. A61.11.5891
    A61.11.5891 April 27 2013 21: 36 New
    +5
    Quote: GreatRussia
    Belarus threatens the West with possible withdrawal from the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT)

    Well, why not?

    Even, with permission, some Pakistan has nuclear weapons.
    And no one in the West blunders about this.
    And here is a European cultural state surrounded by the criminal organization of NATO ....
    God himself commanded.
  35. Genady1976
    Genady1976 April 27 2013 21: 47 New
    12
    I watched the video today in the news
    1. kind
      kind April 27 2013 23: 04 New
      0
      Where is the report? Why one music? Yes, and the caption Minsk in the frame seems superimposed on the main recording.
      1. Lich
        Lich April 28 2013 22: 36 New
        +1
        Quote: Good
        Where is the report? Why one music? Yes, and the caption Minsk in the frame seems superimposed on the main recording.

        You don't seem to have it all superimposed. But this is not the point, but what can happen. Little hint soldier
  36. Sergey S.
    Sergey S. April 27 2013 21: 54 New
    +8
    Quote: VashEstambid
    It ended, the Russians lost it, forgot?
    It is not surprising that someone does not want to be friends with the Russians !!

    1. Lost ... but not Russian, and not even Soviet.
    The “winners” lost - the Cold War turned out not to be a war of minds, but a war of base passions: venality of people, servility of base tastes, worship of bucks, ...
    As a result of the decomposition of the top of the USSR, unfortunately it was, the whole world (western) was infected with this virus.
    Unlike many Soviet citizens who managed to breathe true freedom, equality and fraternity (for the dull: in the workplace, family, school, hospitals, institutes ...).
    Now nothing can save the Westerners and Amers from China, the great communist world factory.
    So, the Chinese won.
    But the amers, in fact, have lost part of their influence in the world, especially in Europe, which is now less afraid of Russia with a fool, and it is somehow strange not afraid of Arabs, Africans, Asians ...
    2. Nobody wants to be friends with Russians. I almost agree, provided that I am talking to a "European."
    Friendship requires the work of the soul, self-denial, mutual assistance and just help to the humiliated and offended.
    And this is clearly beyond our strengths.
    It is important that Russia, finally, has found the strength to again show (non-mercantile) friendly feelings for many countries and peoples.
  37. wax
    wax April 27 2013 22: 22 New
    +1
    ... embittered rhetoric against the West by Russia

    Where does the author come from? Not embittered rhetoric, but a clear desire to find adequate responses to threats.
    1. Ivan.
      Ivan. April 27 2013 22: 31 New
      +1
      Where does the author come from?


      The author of the article we are discussing. No one noticed.
  38. dima-fesko
    dima-fesko April 27 2013 22: 31 New
    0
    Logic is visible, but it is only logic. This is not feasible.
  39. Boomer
    Boomer April 27 2013 23: 01 New
    +3
    Quote: Genady1976
    I watched the video today in the news
    in general, this is the relocation of Topol M from Teykovo to Alabanino to prepare for the Victory Parade
  40. grandfather
    grandfather April 28 2013 01: 14 New
    +4
    I’m just for it, throw pepper to the west)
  41. piotr534
    piotr534 April 28 2013 03: 25 New
    +7
    I already hear the hysterical cry of the Poles, the same thing is necessary for the Russian-Belarusian exercises with the development of a nuclear strike on Warsaw. They will go out there.
  42. dld35057
    dld35057 April 28 2013 05: 37 New
    +1
    the news is significant - now, damn it, you need to quickly lay out the whole stash for loans so that it isn’t possible for anyone, and you can pick up a machine gun in your conscience and put on a parachute; put on a sapper shovel; but first, pay off with the bank and then fight, or not, the Jewish banks will demand that you sell a machine gun for debts and then dig a grave with your own shoulder blade. guys now banks mean more than all nuclear weapons.
    1. Jarilo
      Jarilo April 28 2013 09: 44 New
      +2
      Quote: dld35057
      guys now banks mean more than all nuclear weapons.

      Now yes. But it is not so difficult to change! Banks - to nationalize, the ruble is a hard currency, money from offshore to the economy and defense, well, further down the list ....
      I think Russia has already realized all the joys of capitalism-liberalism, it is time to get up off its knees, and continue on its own path to great achievements! soldier
  43. patriot2
    patriot2 April 28 2013 07: 03 New
    +4
    After the Second World War (our Great Patriotic War) there was a "cold war", then the collapse of the USSR (its defeat and liquidation according to the script written by the USA), and therefore the question arises: Can the States live without an "enemy image"?
    It seems that the way it is, but the fact that Belarus will become a nuclear power is not a question. A friend of Russia should be strong, not sluggish as Ukraine, which is "ready to serve both ours and yours", sitting on two chairs. Well done Old Man! Respect to him and respect! smile
  44. antidote
    antidote April 28 2013 07: 59 New
    +5
    The status of a nuclear power is very strong. Belarus immediately enters the club of nuclear states. The union of the two nuclear powers, Belarus and Russia, is a nightmare for geyropov and the United States. All of Europe at gunpoint, they immediately stop talking to the Old Man.
    And recently, Old Man, handsome, as he said about pro and de.Our Union is a barrier to the spread of gay infection
  45. Opera
    Opera April 28 2013 10: 06 New
    +2
    I just wanted to ask, what is the date of the West 2013 exercises postponed to May?
    Really officially announced the development of a nuclear strike on Poland?
    And yet, is it really that Lukashenko is a blackmailer, and Russia is so angry with the West that the United States will have to (oh, poor, poor unfortunate) react somehow!
    You gentlemen, either forgive me for my incompetence, or read the article more carefully and do not rush to comment.
    1. djon3volta
      djon3volta April 28 2013 12: 18 New
      0
      Quote: Oper
      or read the article more closely and take your time with comments.

      The following is not written in the article:


      At the same time, Sergei Shoigu, the Minister of Defense of Russia, announced the creation of a Russian air base in Belarus, where a fighter air regiment will be permanently deployed in 2015. Technical work on the project will begin this year. It is also possible that the air base will be located Russian bomber aircraft capable of carrying nuclear weapons.

      “We intend to continue to consider the issues necessary to strengthen the defense capabilities of our Belarusian colleagues and brothers,” said Shoigu.
      1. Stalinets
        Stalinets April 29 2013 02: 52 New
        0
        According to Russian Minister of Defense Sergei Shoigu, the start of work on this project is planned for this year: Moscow will deploy an air commandant’s command at the neighbors and put in the first duty unit of combat fighters. “We intend to continue to consider the issues necessary to strengthen the defense capabilities of our Belarusian colleagues and brothers,” Shoigu emphasized. ........ I don’t even see bomber aircraft. Lift my eyelids !!! wink
        1. djon3volta
          djon3volta April 29 2013 07: 41 New
          -2
          and where did you copy the text from, why didn’t you copy the text above? from the same source the text! why didn’t you see what I saw ???
  46. pamero
    pamero April 28 2013 10: 25 New
    +1
    Pink glasses off! Before us are enemies! And not partners, Let's feed your army, so as not to feed someone else's!
  47. knn54
    knn54 April 28 2013 12: 20 New
    +1
    The USA and the EU apply a whole range of political and economic sanctions to Belarus.
    The West has long gone off the roof. And no one applies sanctions (unfortunately) to them.
    PS "Now the bandits will think that they can frighten the Murovts (" The meeting place cannot be changed ")
  48. Ezhaak
    Ezhaak April 28 2013 12: 59 New
    +1
    why, despite the fixed and repeatedly confirmed obligations, some nuclear powers ignore them in practice
    Yes, for a simple reason. They, like insistent Muschins, gave their word and took it back. Amer never do not comply with the agreement. They have laws only for themselves. You can not give a damn about the rest.
  49. finderektor
    finderektor April 28 2013 13: 24 New
    +4
    Old Man will show "Kuzkin Mother" to the entire geyropa.
  50. Enot-poloskun
    Enot-poloskun April 28 2013 13: 39 New
    +2
    And let's elect Lukashenko as the president of Russia!