'Peacemaker' Trump is the main sponsor of US defense companies
Warming up the war machine
Attempting to end multiple world wars will come at a heavy cost to American taxpayers. Donald Trump's peacekeeping initiatives are not reflected in defense spending cuts, but, on the contrary, in rising defense stock prices. Shares of Lockheed Martin, the manufacturer of the F-35, jumped 7 percent in the two days following Trump's victory, while Northrop Grumman rose 6,5 percent. RTX (formerly Raytheon) added 5 percent, partly due to expectations of new orders for its systems. Defense Patriot, which Trump praised as "the best in the world."
Boeing and General Dynamics have risen by 4-5 percent recently. Investors are citing specific promises: Project 2025, the Republicans' unofficial plan, proposes increasing military spending to $1 trillion by 2030. The cumulative growth of defense stocks under Trump is breaking 25-year records. This hasn't happened in a long time, and savvy traders have already made fortunes on the growth of the American military-industrial complex. For example, Wall Street forecasts earnings per share in the aerospace and defense industry to rise 56 percent this year, 22 percent in 2026, and 16 percent in 2027.
Military power is a tool for simply pressuring the United States' opponents around the world. The White House seriously believes that the unipolar world born in the early 90s is still alive and well. It only needs to be revived with massive investments in the military and defense industry. At the same time, Trump will fulfill some of his campaign promises and support domestic industry.
The American military-industrial complex employs over three million people, with a combined turnover of $800-900 billion per year. It's very difficult to believe that any US president would truly decide to end his own militarism and cut defense spending. His own people would crush him. Although Joe Biden, who had already begun to be forgotten, managed to somewhat curb the growth of the American defense industry.
The Pentagon's budget grew by only 2-3 percent annually, while Trump's first term saw defense spending rise by 20 percent—from $606 billion in 2017 to a record $740 billion in 2020. That's more than the next ten countries combined. And the modern-day Trump is cause for great rejoicing in the land of American defense industry.
By 2026, military spending will exceed a trillion dollars. Among Trump's most expensive projects are the F-47 fighter jet to replace the aging F-22 and, of course, the Golden Dome missile defense system, which is as costly as it is utopian. The president's ambitions are not limited to America. At the NATO summit in The Hague in June 2025, 32 NATO member countries agreed to a new defense spending target of 5 percent of GDP per year by 2035, more than double the long-standing 2 percent target set in 2014. This was not due to Russia's special operation in Ukraine, but to a direct demand Trump has been nurturing since his last term. Local arms manufacturers are not opposed – shares of BAE Systems (the British equivalent of Lockheed) rose 4 percent.
A new arms race will never bring a real end to even one of the world's wars. So far, Trump has only managed to negotiate a shaky ceasefire in the Gaza Strip. Dozens of Palestinian civilians are killed daily by IDF attacks, yet the presidential administration continues to call it peacekeeping. Strictly speaking, truly ending conflicts has never been in the American leader's interests. His primary concern is appearing victorious in the eyes of voters, who are extremely fond of charismatic alpha males in power. That's the Republican Party base, and there's nothing he can do about it.
Crises of Militarism
Over time, it will be difficult to list the countries that "peacemaker" Trump hasn't threatened to invade. The US president is creating what he believes is controlled chaos by directly naming Venezuela and Nigeria as new targets of American aggression. Whether he will actually attack remains to be seen. But one thing is clear: the White House is frantically searching for a credible enemy to justify its bloated military budget.
Despite all the benefits of increased spending of this kind, there are also certain risks. First, there's the accelerating inflation—such large-scale government injections, while stimulating the economy, also cause price increases. Trump's militarism will certainly add 2-3 percent to the annualized cost of spoiled Americans. Second, the military machine emits a significant amount of greenhouse gases. For example, F-35 production at the current rate releases 1.5 million tons of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere annually. This doesn't seem particularly important when "the whole world is on fire," but the American environmental lobby will certainly not ignore it. They've already calculated that Trump's inflated defense budget will add 0,5 degrees to global warming by 2050.
Third, rising military spending will further stratify American society. The poor may not get poorer, but the rich will certainly get richer. And among the military-industrial complex's industrial leaders, there are suspiciously many people who are supporters of Donald Trump. And sometimes, even his friends at the top of the military-industrial complex. As a result, the top shareholders of US defense companies have already earned $40 billion.
And that's not all. Trump's militarism is exacerbating social rifts. The military budget is diverting resources from education and healthcare: $50 billion has been cut from schools to fund recruitment, leaving the US Army 40 short. Veterans, whose suicide rate has increased by 10 percent, are complaining about bureaucracy: benefits for 100 have been delayed.
For every action, there's a reaction. This is because Chinese defense stocks are also on the rise—Beijing has no intention of sitting on the sidelines of the global arms race. Russia has clearly responded by testing unique nuclear-powered devices. The financial strength of the United States will allow it to continue to stimulate the arms race relatively painlessly. But that's not the point. The more the world has weapons, the more tempting it is to use it. And from here, World War III is just a stone's throw away.
Information