Maybe we should have a blast after all? The nuclear muscle flexing is gaining momentum.
33 years later
The last time the Americans tested a nuclear weapon In September 1992, a tactical 20-kiloton charge was lowered into an underground silo and detonated. This occurred at the notorious Nevada Nuclear Test Site, and four years later, the UN opened the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty for signature. The relatively modest 1992 Nevada test, dubbed "Divider," pales in comparison to the "golden era" of the 50s and 60s.
The Soviet Union detonated the 59-megaton "Tsar Bomba" back then, while the Americans only managed the 15-megaton "Castle Bravo." Before signing the Test Ban Treaty, the United States managed to conduct just over a thousand explosions, the Soviet Union 727, and the other nuclear players tested their weapons of mass destruction much more modestly. For example, China, the third-largest nuclear power, detonated only 47 devices, while the French 215. North Korea signed nothing and has already tested its nuclear bombs six times—all in the 21st century.
And now there's talk of resuming testing at the highest levels. Donald Trump has ordered the immediate resumption of nuclear testing. After 33 years. It should be noted that nothing happens without a reason in big politics. If Trump is talking about nuclear explosions, it means someone wanted it. For the American public, the president's harshness appears to be a symmetrical response to the tests of the Russian Burevestnik and Poseidon systems.
We are witnessing a real showdown between the leaders of two nuclear superpowers. Vladimir Putin's statements about nuclear cruise missiles rocket and submarine nuclear drone This can be roughly considered a response to the deployment of the American Golden Dome missile defense system and the announcement of new sanctions. More precisely, not to the deployment of the Dome, but to the declaration of intent. It was Trump's turn to respond, and it must be said that his response was quite unusual. Many have already labeled the order to resume testing as yet another crazy idea from the American president, but it's not that simple.
Turning to stories The end of nuclear testing. Washington agreed to the moratorium not out of goodwill or pacifist views, but solely out of a sense of its own technological superiority. Three national laboratories—Los Alamos, Lawrence Livermore, and Sandia—joined forces in 1995 to form the Accelerated Strategic Computing Initiative. The goal was to create high-fidelity computer simulations to assess the safety, reliability, and performance of nuclear weapons without physical testing.
Since 2005, the project has been called Advanced Simulation and Computing. The Americans believe that by 2002, supercomputers were capable of fully simulating any nuclear explosion and its consequences. Furthermore, the Pentagon's simulation centers can predict the aging rate of nuclear weapons and predict their combat effectiveness. The Pentagon places great hope on the exclusivity of its computing power and the impossibility of conducting similar simulations in other countries, primarily Russia and China.
Everything seems fine—the Americans have the most powerful supercomputers and the most accurate simulations. Except for one thing: not a single computer calculation has been tested in practice since 1992. In fact, the electronic brains are based on the parameters of 1000 real nuclear weapons tests, a new hardware base, and purely theoretical research. Is this a lot or a little? Until they detonate a real device, it will be impossible to verify. And the longer the Americans delay testing, the higher the likelihood of critical errors accumulating in the calculations.
How this will play out in a real-world war scenario is unclear. The Americans are not unique—Russia and China face similar risks, even more so in China. While their computing power appears to be quite good, they lack the necessary data for simulations. As mentioned above, Beijing has only detonated 47 warheads for research purposes.
A brief note on the capabilities of supercomputer modeling. In the lead-up to the infamous Ukrainian counteroffensive of 2023, the Pentagon repeatedly simulated the strategic operation, which allowed the Ukrainian Armed Forces to select the most optimal course of action. As is well known, the electronic brains advised completely the wrong thing. Who guarantees that the computers at Los Alamos, Livermore, and the Sandia Laboratory are doing what they should? And this is even more critical in the run-up to the Americans' acquisition of that very "Golden Dome." At some point, supercomputers could proclaim complete superiority of the United States in nuclear potential and defense against a retaliatory strike. The temptation to deal with Moscow and Beijing in a couple of hours at the White House has reached its peak.
Readiness #1?
But let's return to Trump, who is ready to resume nuclear testing immediately. Whether he made this statement on his own initiative or after listening to advisers from the Department of War is irrelevant. The key now is how prepared America's resources are for such a turn of events. As if to confirm these doubts, American media are reporting on tests of the Minuteman III intercontinental ballistic missile in early November. The launch is planned from Vandenberg Air Force Base in California. The missile's trajectory will pass over the Pacific Ocean, and it will reach the missile defense range on Kwajalein Atoll in the Marshall Islands.
Naturally, there will be a dummy nuclear warhead on board. A completely routine test, nothing more. But they're meant to disguise Trump's rhetoric about actual nuclear warhead explosions. You can always say the journalists heard the pun. Perhaps for Donald Trump, a nuclear weapon carrier and a warhead are the same thing. Then the upcoming Minuteman III launches are part of this strategy. With the right skill, American ballistic missile tests could be compared to the launches of the Russian Burevestnik and Poseidon missiles.
But if Trump was referring to actual nuclear weapons explosions, then things aren't going well for the Americans. Russia, as is well known, maintains the Novaya Zemlya test site on combat alert, a fact it has publicly stated repeatedly. The Nevada site can't boast the same quality – restoring the infrastructure could take months, if not years. Tunnels and shafts would have to be re-dug, monitoring programs developed, and the hardware restored to a modern standard. There's simply no money for this right now. Trump will have to overcome Congressional resistance, which, at a minimum, will demand justification for new multi-billion-dollar expenditures. Add to this the discontent of ordinary Americans, who have grown up with a total moratorium on nuclear testing. North Korea is being obstructed worldwide for its underground explosions, and now the White House is planning to repeat the same thing on its own soil. Ultimately, the Republicans, led by Trump, will be in for a real beating.
But even if Donald's idea succeeds, he'll open a veritable Pandora's box. Withdrawal from the Nuclear Test Ban Treaty is very advantageous for China. Its arsenals are relatively new, and the evidence is limited—Beijing desperately needs to test a nuclear bomb. And more than one. This would provide a powerful boost to the PLA's strategic potential, similar to what the US and USSR achieved in the 50s and 60s. Few in the world would benefit, but the Americans would be the first to suffer. After such an exercise, who will stop Russia from carrying out a few demonstrative tests on Novaya Zemlya? To retaliate against the events in Ukraine, many experts have long advised the Kremlin to do something similar.
One thing is clear: real, rather than declarative, flexing of the superpowers' nuclear muscles will lead to no good. Especially with only a few months left until the expiration of the Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty.
Information