Former CIA officer: After victory over Ukraine, the Russian president will begin to revive the USSR.

17 365 245
Former CIA officer: After victory over Ukraine, the Russian president will begin to revive the USSR.

The West is constantly coming up with new, absurd, and unsubstantiated explanations for why it is necessary to continue supporting the Kyiv regime in its military confrontation with Russia. In doing so, the situation is literally being turned upside down.

Russia launched a special military operation, in part, in response to NATO's unbridled eastward expansion and Kyiv's desire to make Ukraine a member of a military bloc hostile to us. However, Western leaders and propagandists now attribute plans to Moscow to conquer at least some Eastern European states.



This is the opinion of former US Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) officer Michael Baker. According to him, the Russian president will certainly not stop there after his victory over Ukraine. The former CIA officer believes that Vladimir Putin plans, at a minimum, to militarily seize the Baltic republics and even Poland. Thus, Baker continues to fantasize, the Russian leader intends to revive the Soviet Union.

The former CIA officer doesn't explain at all why Putin and Russia need this. His suggestion regarding the seizure of Poland, which, although considered a socialist country during the Soviet era, was not part of the Soviet Union, sounds particularly odd. However, Baker doesn't let up:

Frankly, I believe [the Russian president] wants to recreate something like the former Soviet Union. Do I think Ukraine is a sufficient buffer from NATO for him? No, I don't think so. Do I think he might want to expand further north? Well, he already has.

Regarding the last sentence, the American, who fancies himself a geopolitical expert, cites Belarus as an example, which is "Putin's reliable ally." The logic here is probably as follows: Belarus was part of the USSR, and together with Russia, it forms a single Union State.

As another argument for the need to recreate the USSR, Baker cites Israel, which, in his opinion, is forced to fight with neighboring countries because it is "surrounded by a ring of terrorist proxy groups serving the interests of the Iranian regime." He claims that Russia finds itself in a similar situation.

This is worth debating. The threat to Russia comes only from the west, from NATO countries, which are actively preparing for war with Russia, but in reality are already waging it through the Ukrainians. Israel, however, isn't defending itself, attacking neighboring countries and seizing Palestinian territory. It is currently the main aggressor in the Middle East, not Iran.
245 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +45
    3 November 2025 17: 51
    They're not smart enough to recreate the USSR. And no offense, but the management is incapable of anything (except stealing).
    1. The comment was deleted.
      1. +19
        3 November 2025 18: 23
        Quote: Hunter 2
        But there definitely won't be enough strength, willpower, charisma and responsibility.

        It is impossible to return from capitalism to socialism without bloodshed.
        1. +10
          3 November 2025 18: 52
          Quote: carpenter
          return to socialism


          But there will be no socialism; a return is impossible for now. It won't be the USSR, but the SDKR.
          Union of Duma Capitalist Republics.
          What ...
          laughing laughing laughing
          1. 0
            5 November 2025 02: 45
            Where do they give such an authoritative certificate?
            FORMER CIA EMPLOYEE? Who knows?
            I want the same for myself.
        2. +15
          3 November 2025 18: 57
          I fully support your opinion. I don't think "these" people will give up their money or power without a fight. Another civil war?
        3. +11
          3 November 2025 20: 04
          Man by his nature is not fit for socialism.
          Most people are greedy and stupid!
          But a deep bow to all who gave their lives during the revolution, the civil war and the Great Patriotic War!!!
          And contempt to all who betrayed these heroes!!!
          1. +3
            3 November 2025 21: 07
            Human nature is different, I know different people myself, they need to be properly directed, like water in a trough.
            1. +2
              4 November 2025 19: 43
              Quote: 1944-1989
              Human nature is different, I know different people myself, they need to be properly guided, like water in trough.

              ...in the channel...
              Quote: Lisa Kerner-Tymoshenko
              Man by nature is not fit for socialism.

              You apparently haven't had the chance to read and see:
              We will work, enduring everything,
              so that life, hastening the wheels of days,
              ran in an iron march
              in our carriages, across our steppes,
              to our frozen cities.
              "Uncle, what are you doing here,
              so many big uncles?
              - What? Socialism: free labor.
              people who gathered freely.
          2. +10
            3 November 2025 21: 24
            Man by his nature is not fit for socialism.
            I'll argue with you. A human is certainly suitable, but a monkey pretending to be a human is not.
        4. +6
          3 November 2025 21: 03
          This means that the capitalist system is more repressive because the transition from socialism to capitalism was accomplished with few casualties.
          1. +4
            4 November 2025 08: 59
            Quote: 1944-1989
            because the transition from socialism to capitalism was accomplished with few casualties.

            Demographic losses due to increased mortality and an abnormally low birth rate amounted to 23,5 million people for Russia alone, if we take into account migration and the population of Crimea. Without them, the total comes to 37 million. And if we consider the entire USSR as a whole, the figures are even higher – 54 million people in 2015.
            1. +4
              4 November 2025 10: 22
              Yes, this is one of the many crimes of capitalism that is not spoken about openly, it is a crime of the capitalist system.
        5. +1
          4 November 2025 02: 30
          You can't step into the same river twice... But, for example, in our Reich - the Germans themselves (mostly Ossies, of course), 10 years after they themselves tore down the Wall, started to feel nostalgic for the GDR, and now they're openly saying that we need to disunite the Reich and rebuild the GDR... For now, they're just wagging their tongues in kitchens and pubs (in our country, by the way, you can get 15 years in prison for this - under the article for calling for the overthrow of the existing system), but the anger in the Germans, as I see it, is growing...
          1. +2
            4 November 2025 10: 34
            Popular anger is growing, but trust is directed toward charlatan parties that serve only the interests of the rich and disdain the "ordinary" people who vote for them. I'm thinking of the AfD, Trump, or Farage's party in England, who himself recently declared that the rich are "the best people."

            However, the Marxist idea remains the best description of this world, which does not mean a complete return to the GDR. Rather, all of Germany will become socialist if Germany and other countries stop placing their hopes on far-right scams and "left" or centrist parties.
        6. +1
          4 November 2025 08: 39
          If the oligarchs from the ruling clan take charge of this themselves (which is impossible), there won't be much bloodshed. It's easier when it's from above. Only a handful will have to be defatted, and their private security companies won't dance against the state security forces. But why would they need it?
          1. +1
            4 November 2025 08: 43
            Quote: Essex62
            If the oligarchs from the ruling clan take care of this themselves (which is impossible), there won’t be much bloodshed.

            True, and that's exactly what they don't need.
      2. +19
        3 November 2025 18: 37
        Quote: Hunter 2
        there are practically no fools in power,

        Alas. In bulk.
        1. +9
          3 November 2025 20: 06
          ..not only are there a lot of fools there, but also thieves!!!
      3. +8
        3 November 2025 19: 51
        If there are many traitors in power, then it is a power of traitors.
        Give another explanation if you can.
    2. +7
      3 November 2025 19: 54
      marchcat
      To be smart, you have to be a theoretician. There are no such people in power today.
      Lenin himself wrote 53 volumes of works.
      How many scientific papers have today's leaders written?
      1. -8
        3 November 2025 21: 14
        It would be better if Lenin hadn't done this...
        laughing
        To each his own...
      2. -6
        4 November 2025 02: 35
        Yeah, right there - sat and wrote all 53 volumes... - have you even read this scribbled material yourself? -... read it. - it contains all the letters that Ilyich wrote from 1900 to 1920, and not just the theses, but also correspondence - business, personal, including various everyday and household notes - and of this scribbled material - probably two-thirds are various commentaries and explanations for the dumb - so that their own understandings and interpretations of Ilyich's words don't inadvertently arise in the reader's head.... laughing
        1. +3
          4 November 2025 09: 46
          Unlike you, I read and took notes on Lenin’s articles and works.
    3. -4
      3 November 2025 19: 55
      Why recreate the USSR? To put Ukrainians and others on our backs again? Do we need that?
      1. +1
        4 November 2025 00: 08
        Definitely not! Everyone's screaming like crazy, like, "The migrants are in their way!" They've already developed a phobia of migrants!
        And the idea that later all of Central Asia will no longer be migrants, but will live throughout Russia as masters - they don’t have the brains for that.
        Well, what about it... your brain is only 3 grams, like a chicken's!
        1. +1
          4 November 2025 00: 17
          Well, actually, the idea of ​​populating Russia with Uzbeks was born from Ukrainians in Brezhnev's Politburo in the early 80s. Marked One got them into trouble.
          1. -1
            4 November 2025 08: 53
            Where is the droushka?
            Considering that, firstly, there are no Ukrainians in nature, and the Uzbeks sat at home and infiltrated (instantly assimilating) in single individuals, this is nonsense.
            1. -1
              4 November 2025 08: 55
              Well, well, there is a butt, but no words.
              If there are no Ukrainians in your universe, you are unlikely to find anything else.
              1. +3
                4 November 2025 09: 07
                A typical post-perestroika product, with brainwashed, enemy-like images. Of course not. South Russians.
                1. +2
                  4 November 2025 09: 29
                  1. Southern Russians come in different forms. Not all of them are Ukrainians, for example, Cossacks or those from Donetsk. Accordingly, attitudes toward them vary.
                  2. You can deny something until it hits you between the ears. Then you'll have to come to terms with reality and start taking this factor into account.
                  1. +2
                    4 November 2025 09: 32
                    You're confusing the arrogant people who seized power on the outskirts and instilled their ideas in some Russians with Ukrainians. The problem is ideological, not national. That's what civil war is.
                    1. +1
                      4 November 2025 09: 34
                      Raguli are Ukrainians, there are no others. We don't need to sort out the different types of shit. Let them splash around in their own shit.
                      1. +3
                        4 November 2025 09: 37
                        So, are we giving up 20 million of our fellow citizens to the West? Why the hell do we need Russians? We'll just bring in villagers. Well, actually, the fighters, they maintained this principle, having taken power from a gang of idiots.
                      2. -1
                        4 November 2025 09: 40
                        What fellow citizens? Name them!
                        What are their names? Where are they suffering? Are they really suffering from unrequited love for us, or is there something else going on?
                        About the villagers. There is no hatred between us and the villagers. Is that clear?
                      3. +3
                        4 November 2025 09: 50
                        There are certainly quite a few of them. Practically all native Odessites, for example. And their brains were washed by the division of the country into appanage principalities. Just look at the situation as it is now, after 10 years of the Civil War. And yet, this could have been prevented. But the towers had their reasons. They effectively recognized Bandera's rule.
                      4. +1
                        4 November 2025 09: 53
                        Oh, come on, don't talk about Odessa, don't…
                        If everyone else is the same, then we don't need them all. At worst, send them all to Sheremetyevo or let them join Israel.
                      5. +3
                        4 November 2025 10: 00
                        What kind of love are we talking about? To whom, to us? To you personally? The simple fact is that we lived in a single state, without hostility. Different, but united. And then those who loved to profiteer tore it apart and provoked a civil war. And they're profiting. The fact that the raguli ended up in the outskirts of Russia is entirely the fault of the profiteering authorities.
                      6. 0
                        4 November 2025 10: 09
                        Well, don't tell me fairy tales about life in the USSR, I served my conscription in the Soviet Army, I saw plenty of friendship between peoples back then, and those impressions will last a lifetime.
                      7. +2
                        4 November 2025 10: 18
                        Did they cut each other down, like today? Rough edges between different cultures are inevitable, only unified laws smoothed them over. And the Soviet Union, with its hazing, was certainly no resort. Remember those "grandfathers" of different nationalities, weren't they all working together to raise "spirits"? And where there was real war, they didn't even consider nationality. Everyone walked in the shadow of death, all united. Just like today.
                      8. 0
                        4 November 2025 10: 20
                        What's wrong? Where did Karabakh and Sumgait come from? Meskhetian Turks? Haven't you heard?
                        Do you think the Crimean Tatars were simply evicted from Crimea? But they were actually saved…
      2. +1
        4 November 2025 02: 39
        You don't need to recreate anything - just cleanse Russia of thieves and crooks in government.... Yes, it's difficult, but it's necessary!
        1. +1
          4 November 2025 08: 53
          It's impossible. It's just that in your mind, anyone who can control anything is a thief, a crook, etc.
      3. -1
        4 November 2025 08: 49
        It's true about the others, but the Ukrainian SSR had tremendous industrial and agricultural potential. No one is even talking about returning Central Asia. And the Baltics, as a buffer, will come in handy. Just don't turn them into window dressing again. The Georgians and Armenians, as always, will adapt and shove their way into the new Union.
        1. +1
          4 November 2025 08: 57
          There will be no new Union. There will be Russia! He who doesn't work, neither shall he eat. Those without soap, go to hell!
          1. 0
            4 November 2025 09: 10
            This principle is absolutely not suitable for the current socio-political system. On the contrary, everything is the opposite in Russia.
            Will you also shove the Bulbash into Russia?
            1. +1
              4 November 2025 09: 31
              Why should we shove anyone anywhere? We have everything of our own! The main principle is the absence of threats!
              1. 0
                4 November 2025 09: 33
                So the people will remain divided into specific estates?
                1. +1
                  4 November 2025 09: 35
                  What people? Belarusians? Are they sure they want to live in the same state with us? Somehow I doubt it…
                  1. +1
                    4 November 2025 09: 39
                    The question is, in what way? In the way it is today, definitely not. Batka still has a huge chunk of socialism left over.
                    1. +1
                      4 November 2025 09: 42
                      Are you absolutely sure Russians would want to live in Belarus? I think they prefer Russia!
                      1. +1
                        4 November 2025 09: 52
                        Belarusians are part of the Russian people. And by the way, many people like it. I have friends who left and don't regret it.
                      2. +1
                        4 November 2025 09: 56
                        Yes, I'm not against it, the Belarusians are against it!
    4. 0
      4 November 2025 00: 05
      Couch strategist?
      And she's got enough brains - exactly 3 grams, like a chicken, and she's got everything... but the problem is, no one's calling her to power, much less to the presidency. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
      Why? They probably know for sure that he's dishonest?
  2. +16
    3 November 2025 17: 51
    It's easy to destroy, as a rule... it's much more difficult to build/recreate.
    The current "masters of life" and everything else will never restore... the USSR, for example.
    And in general, what can they create or restore?
    1. +2
      3 November 2025 18: 07
      Quote: rocket757
      And in general, what can they create or restore?

      Crimea has been returned, and four more regions of former Ukraine are being returned to the Russian Federation. Isn't this a restoration of historical justice and a strengthening of state sovereignty, or is it something else entirely?
      1. +3
        3 November 2025 19: 24
        They brought it back, there's no denying it... who and how perceives it is a matter of personal convictions and preferences...
        That is, recognizing ALL the obvious facts, should people treat the current government, the ruling class... differently/in a different way???
      2. +2
        3 November 2025 19: 56
        This is strengthening the defense capability of the Russian Federation.
    2. -1
      3 November 2025 19: 56
      Considering that the USSR was ruled by Ukrainians, it is unlikely that the Russian leadership will restore it.
      1. +1
        3 November 2025 21: 18
        Quote: Vatnik_
        Considering that the USSR was ruled by Ukrainians, it is unlikely that the Russian leadership will restore it.

        The USSR was led by people of different nationalities. It is unlikely that they were Ukrainians. Because there is no such nationality. There are Russians, Hutsuls, Rusyns, Bulgarians, Poles, Slovaks, Jews, Little Russians, Tatars, and about a hundred other nationalities living on the territory of the former Ukrainian SSR. Brezhnev was Russian, Khrushchev was Russian. Shcherbitsky was a Little Russian.
        1. -3
          3 November 2025 22: 09
          Well, I have nothing to add; in your universe, Ukrainians probably don't exist at all.
          1. +1
            4 November 2025 09: 58
            Quote: Vatnik_
            Well, I have nothing to add; in your universe, Ukrainians probably don't exist at all.

            In my universe, there is a triune Russian people: White Rus', Little Rus', and Great Rus'. In your Bandera universe, there live the Judeo-Ukrainians Waltzmans, Kapitelmans, Zelenskys, Groysmans, Kalamoishes, and Yermaks. Kish mir in tuches laughing bully
            1. -1
              4 November 2025 10: 02
              What a parallel universe.
              You don't happen to have any rainbow-farting unicorns?
              1. 0
                4 November 2025 10: 03
                Quote: Vatnik_
                What a parallel universe.
                You don't happen to have any rainbow-farting unicorns?

                Have you seen rainbow unicorns? laughing Come on... keep writing... they'll give you three shekels.
                1. -1
                  4 November 2025 10: 11
                  Wow, Ukrainians are so funny...
                  For some reason, they think that if their divorce didn't work out, they've stumbled upon a Jew. Isn't that offensive?
      2. +1
        3 November 2025 21: 22
        Who wasn't in the leadership of the USSR...
        1. 0
          3 November 2025 22: 10
          There were no Russians🤣
          There were some, but mostly they were married to Jewish women.
          This is especially evident in Stalin's Politburo.
          1. +3
            3 November 2025 23: 05
            The country is huge, there are many people of different nationalities...
            But it’s not about nationality, but about what kind of person he is, what kind of actions he takes!!!
            By the way, RUSSIAN is not a nationality, but a state of a person’s SPIRIT.
            Here's a funny example from the movie "Zhmurki"... how the black guy Vasya answered "RUSSIAN, I AM RUSSIAN" and he was within his rights, based on the state of his soul, and not for some other reason! soldier
            1. +3
              3 November 2025 23: 19
              Russians are also different, pro-Soviet Russians and anti-Soviet Russians are radically different in everything.
              1. +3
                3 November 2025 23: 32
                We are not a mono-ethnic state, and not everyone considers themselves Russian...
                Not everyone is prepared to adhere to a simple division into classes...
                The working class against the exploiters... it seems clear, it should be understandable, but those who want to throw shade have now learned to use incredibly sophisticated methods of persuasion!!!
                Young people will never receive the necessary knowledge to wage a proper political struggle for their rights... all that's left is home-based educational programs and some kind of interest groups...
                In general, everything is very tricky, confusing and not simple.
            2. +1
              3 November 2025 23: 44
              So you think that the 120 million Russians who call themselves Russians don't have any nationality? Funny...
              That is, different Papuans have nationality, but Russians, with their historical homeland in Vladimir-Suzdal Rus, do not.
              1. +1
                4 November 2025 09: 04
                Literally, of course, Russian is a nationality. But figuratively, one can be Russian both in spirit (without being Russian by blood) and in identity (considering Russian culture and language as one's own). Russians are not just a nationality; they are an ethnic group, with a strong Slavic core, but also having absorbed and assimilated millions of representatives of other nationalities over the centuries: Finno-Ugrics, various nomadic peoples, Germans. Strong nations are capable of this.

                Is it worth arguing about? We are RUSSIANS, and nothing else matters.
                1. 0
                  4 November 2025 09: 15
                  Well, how come it doesn't? It does. Whatever you name a yacht, that's how it will sail.
                  1. +1
                    4 November 2025 09: 23
                    There is a Russian spirit there
                    It smells of Russia there!
                    A personal, conscious choice... to embrace the very essence of the definition of RUSSIAN or to beat around the bush...
                    1. +2
                      4 November 2025 09: 32
                      Well, in order for the choice to be conscious, you need to understand what we are talking about.
                      1. +1
                        4 November 2025 09: 47
                        As written or as explained, taught... different interpretations of the same thing are no longer uncommon.
                        And the way they explained and raised me, there's plenty of scope for my imagination to run wild...
                        I personally prefer precision in terms and definitions, but that's not always the case. The variety of paths people take to identifying themselves as someone and related to someone else is simply too great.
                      2. +1
                        4 November 2025 09: 52
                        Wow! Precision in terminology! Otherwise, there's confusion, chaos, and those who like to fish in troubled waters! And why do we need crooks?
                      3. +1
                        4 November 2025 09: 59
                        When a person determines something important for themselves independently, the choice is made consciously, and no terms, whether right or wrong, prevent them from following the chosen path.
                        Although everything should be clear and understandable at the state level, this simplifies the choice of those who are led and do not know how to make choices independently.
                      4. +1
                        4 November 2025 10: 07
                        What do you mean, unnecessary? What defines any nation? The cultural values ​​shared by all members of that nation. So, if you call yourself Russian, it means you're ready to embrace the entire set of Russian cultural values, in their entirety, without having to pick and choose, like Cheburashka, what suits you and what doesn't. Otherwise, you might get a slap in the face from Gena.
                      5. +2
                        4 November 2025 10: 12
                        Come on, someone claims that Christianity, RELIGIOSITY, is such a value, a real value... not everyone is ready to accept it... and that now they shouldn’t consider themselves Russian.
                        Not so simple.
                      6. +2
                        4 November 2025 10: 17
                        Cultural values ​​are not religion, they are markers of friend or foe.
                        What are some of the markers Russians use? For example, respect for work. The best man is the one who works hard. Why is this so important? Because Ukrainians frown upon work; they value cunning, deception, and fraud. Read Russian and Ukrainian folk proverbs.
                        This is precisely why Sheremetyevo.
                      7. 0
                        4 November 2025 10: 21
                        Different people, different opinions...
                        What's important, what defines... family values, the upbringing of the younger generation. The foundations are laid early and are difficult to change later; not everyone is willing to act contrary to what was instilled in them in their family.
                        In general, it's like this everywhere.
                      8. +2
                        4 November 2025 10: 30
                        It's simple: the set of values ​​you embrace determines your ethnicity. If you came to Russia from Ukraine to scam Russians (suckers, indeed!), then no matter what you call yourself, you're Ukrainian! If you came to America from Russia and went to work in a factory or the military, then you're Russian (by the way, if you're in the military, you can still be Ukrainian, but not in a factory!), no question!
                      9. 0
                        4 November 2025 10: 35
                        With those who are the enemy, everything is clear...
                        With those who are neither fish nor fowl, things can be so confusing and uncertain that it's somewhat more difficult to figure things out, draw conclusions, and make concrete decisions...
                        Man is such a strange creature, often you can’t immediately understand who he is and for whom...
                      10. +2
                        4 November 2025 10: 38
                        It's simple. If he's one of our own, he falls into line and goes with the rest. If he starts acting like he's not me, the cow isn't mine, then goodbye, we have plenty of smart ones of our own.
                        Loving everyone who hasn't robbed you or punched you in the face doesn't lead to anything good.
                        People must prove themselves that they are Russian!
                      11. +1
                        4 November 2025 10: 55
                        If you look more closely at the processes taking place within our country, you can see different things...
                        It is not ours that are being brought back, those who have not made up their minds... it is more difficult with them, but gradually, even among them, a division into ours and not ours is taking place, the consequences are absolutely certain and inevitable.
                        Time and events will put everything in its place.
                      12. +1
                        4 November 2025 10: 59
                        What do you mean, not ours? And who are "ours"?
                        There is no hatred between us and the Tajiks. Think about it.
                        With Asians and the rest, it's simple: don't let them create diasporas and don't let them bring women and children. Some will stay and marry Russians, some will go back.
                        Simple rules.
                      13. 0
                        4 November 2025 11: 07
                        Ours/not ours... we discussed this issue more than once.
                        It is precisely on this issue that everything is more or less clear and there is general agreement, at least the majority have made up their minds.
                        Nationality... doesn't really matter, the main thing is the deeds, the actions of each and everyone together...
                        In general, a multinational international is gathering, as before...
                      14. +2
                        4 November 2025 11: 15
                        A Russian is someone who professes Orthodoxy and speaks Russian.
                        Moscow, 14th century.
                        On that and stand.
                      15. 0
                        4 November 2025 11: 17
                        A very limiting definition...
                      16. +2
                        4 November 2025 11: 20
                        Well, seven hundred years have passed, however.
                        Now, instead of Orthodoxy, they write “cultural values” and add “considers himself Russian,” because there are many Russian-speaking people who do not consider themselves Russian.
    3. -1
      3 November 2025 20: 08
      ...while they are not even able to defeat Banderastan (not to mention the guys at the front!!!)
      1. +1
        3 November 2025 21: 32
        There is a problem, a "simple" one... often, it is easier to destroy opponents than to defeat them, guided by significant self-restraint...
        In addition... defeating an enemy supported by such a strong union of countries is no easy task.
        1. +2
          4 November 2025 13: 26
          Quote: rocket757
          ... defeating an enemy supported by such a strong union of countries is no easy task.
          The American's words seem to me simply far-fetched, intended to justify further actions against Russia, the creation of all sorts of coalitions, the further militarization of capitalist countries... After all, such accusations have been made before, from time to time. This is a continuation of the demonization of Russians.
          1. +1
            4 November 2025 13: 39
            They lied before, and they will continue to lie...
            They need to stimulate their skakuas because the military-industrial complex figures are no less thirsty for ENRICHMENT than before, always.
            1. +1
              4 November 2025 13: 45
              The first time words about recreating the USSR were spoken was given.
              Quote: rocket757
              .....They need to stimulate their skakuas because the figures from the military-industrial complex are no less thirsty for ENRICHMENT than before, always.

              We also need to distract the population from their own problems. So that they don't ask unnecessary questions about their lives, but fear the evil Russians.
              1. +1
                4 November 2025 13: 49
                The propaganda is sophisticated and complex...
                Unfortunately, they managed to create an entire system of population control based on myths and lies.
                1. +1
                  4 November 2025 13: 54
                  However, it will become increasingly difficult to lie with each passing day, given all the internal problems they are currently facing, including financial ones. recourse How can you not blame Russia here? And China, too.
                  The cat abandoned her kittens ---- Putin is also to blame! laughing
                  1. +1
                    4 November 2025 13: 58
                    The average person already has established behavior patterns for all occasions... local authorities have worked hard on this.
                    For something to change in the minds of ordinary people, a cataclysm of great proportions must occur...
    4. +1
      4 November 2025 02: 44
      Yeah... - they sent Zhoga to Yekaterinburg to strangle that nest of depravity - the Yolkind Center.... and it's like a condom - they're squashing it in Yekaterinburg - and it's popping out like a bubble between their fingers already in Moscow and St. Petersburg... It's somehow wrong to squash this Yolkind Center - they need to dust it - and the bedbugs that feed in it - in a new Gulag-2, founded especially for them. laughing
      1. 0
        4 November 2025 09: 18
        They say that a legacy remains from one person to another... but some people leave behind wounds that never heal...
  3. +5
    3 November 2025 17: 51
    A former CIA officer believes that Vladimir Putin plans to, at a minimum, militarily seize the Baltic republics and even Poland.

    They gave him a thousand dollars, and he opened his mouth. And we already know who gave it to him. The owners of the Balts and Poles.
    1. +4
      3 November 2025 18: 13
      Quote: South Ukrainian
      They gave him a thousand dollars and he opened his mouth.

      He opened his mouth, but somehow ineptly. For some reason, he forgot to mention Kaliningrad as a springboard for an offensive on Europe.
      Do I think he might want to move further north? Well, he already did that.

      After all, it would be possible to attack from the Kaliningrad region in the southern direction, and such a scare tactic would look even more terrifying. smile
    2. +6
      3 November 2025 18: 41
      They're trying to scare the former Soviet republics into fighting Russia. Their hope that the Ukrainians alone would be enough to defeat Russia has been ruined, so now they're squirming around, trying to figure out who else to force.
      1. +1
        3 November 2025 22: 19
        Well, some friends from Latvia sent me this. Like, "Halloween" in Latvian means "to scare," so to scare. laughing
        1. 0
          3 November 2025 22: 46
          Quote: South Ukrainian
          They gave him a thousand dollars and he opened his mouth.
          Such a job, like working with a mouth, and for money, too - so tolerantly...
          Quote: Montezuma
          but somehow it's talentless. For some reason I forgot to mention... such a scare tactic would have been even scarier. smile
          He forgot the words of the original source and the reminder from Lavrov - why?
          Quote: Warabey
          This is how they want to scare the former Soviet republics.
          - Come on, come on: there are independent politicians there - they scare themselves without reminders... They'll even take the Supreme Command to court: they prepared, they nagged, they nagged, but he didn't show up...
          In general, it seems to me that God is punishing Westerners by sending them experts who don't listen to the original source, or even to their own experienced ones. As Her Majesty's former ambassador to Russia said: - If you want to understand Putin, read Putin, and not the interpretation of his words from CNN/BBC/etc. It is advisable to read from the Munich speech of 2007
        2. 0
          4 November 2025 02: 47
          Actually, in Latvia, you can end up in prison for such creativity... They have, I think, a criminal code article there - "for glorifying the symbols of communism"... But on the other hand, the Latvians there have already tortured Russians (and they seem to be a third of the population) so much with their idiotic Nazi laws that I think when entering these territories of the Russian Federation, many Russian-speakers will happily begin a safari against the most vicious Nazis, well, and everyone else who supports them... laughing
  4. +5
    3 November 2025 17: 54
    And what if not..............
  5. +12
    3 November 2025 17: 57
    I propose to begin the revival by returning to the Soviet retirement age!
    1. +1
      3 November 2025 18: 02
      Quote: Roman Efremov
      I propose to begin the revival by returning to the Soviet retirement age!

      To begin with, conduct a holy inquisition against employees of the Kremlin and the government building.
      1. -4
        3 November 2025 18: 15
        Quote: ximkim
        To begin with, conduct a holy inquisition against employees of the Kremlin and the government building.

        Announce the entire list, please (c)
        1. 0
          3 November 2025 20: 10
          The list will be long.... winked
      2. +1
        3 November 2025 21: 23
        Quote: ximkim
        Quote: Roman Efremov
        I propose to begin the revival by returning to the Soviet retirement age!

        To begin with, conduct a holy inquisition against employees of the Kremlin and the government building.

        We need to start in the early nineties. All the former comrades who destroyed the country should be taken for granted. Half the country participated in the theft and destruction of the USSR. They shouted "Hurray, hurray!" We'll now live like in France!
    2. +9
      3 November 2025 18: 17
      Quote: Roman Efremov
      I propose to begin the revival by returning to the Soviet retirement age!

      Or maybe the land for the peasants, the factories for the workers!
      Is it possible to simply return energy, aviation, heavy industry and mining to state ownership?
      Should we get rid of this Central Bank and return the state-owned Bank of Russia? No?
      What to do with financial speculation and three hundred banks?
      1. +3
        3 November 2025 18: 39
        ...yeah, and what about the banks for the bankers??? laughing
        (continuing the slogan about land and factories)
      2. 0
        3 November 2025 18: 42
        Revolution again? Not from below, but from above? Revolution from the Tsar? Such things have happened in history, but the Tsar was different…
      3. +2
        3 November 2025 19: 13
        Okay, let's assume
        Quote: ROSS 42
        Land for the peasants, factories for the workers!

        It happened by some miracle and bloodlessly, without collapse and anarchy.
        Lucky
        And then-
        Quote: ROSS 42
        Should we get rid of this Central Bank and return the state-owned Bank of Russia? No?
        What to do with financial speculation and three hundred banks?

        - arises piquancy lol
        Because you are 300 banks and financial speculators nationalized and freed citizens from the damned credit bondage/mortgage - that is, the State Bank AUTOMATICALLY I was left with nothing (grand zero...) - because banks borrow their funds from the Central Bank at interest. The banks' assets are minimal, and you forgave the loans.
        Deposits in these banks - who will pay citizens after nationalization and from what funds?
        A number of banks operate abroad – who will honor their loans and deposits after nationalization?
        Bank employees from 300 banks will become unemployed. Where will they go? Just don't tell me they'll become turners (like Essex he pushed me lol about bloggers).
        Where to put the premises (300 banks - several thousand offices) and who will pay for utilities and guard them?
        Banks participating in international treaties of the Russian Federation can be changed only with the consent of the other party, and it is not a fact that the other party will agree.
        Foreign investors will also have a great time after the liquidation of the banks.

        And this is a tiny fraction of the issues that arise in the event of the liquidation of the current banking system.
    3. +3
      3 November 2025 18: 26
      Quote: Roman Efremov
      I propose to begin the revival by returning to the Soviet retirement age!

      Dreams, dreams, Where is your sweetness? Where are you, where are you, Night joy?
    4. +1
      3 November 2025 23: 12
      Didn't get through?... Well, I also, they said, wasn't quite ready yet... wassat
    5. +1
      4 November 2025 11: 21
      Which one are you talking about? Before or after 1936?
  6. HAM
    +8
    3 November 2025 17: 59
    But why do we need THIS? Feed the Baltic parasites again, turning them into a "showcase"...? No, no way, you won't get that!... It seems that in the West this is exactly what they're dreaming about - to dump the parasites back on us.
    1. +2
      3 November 2025 18: 18
      I agree with you. Russia under the Union was the worst off and the worst financed of all the republics.
      1. +2
        3 November 2025 19: 13
        Yeah. Moscow was particularly hard hit by the lack of funding.
        Which Soviet republic did people travel to from all over to earn money?
        Maybe they went to work in places where the pay was the worst.
        1. 0
          3 November 2025 19: 58
          But the locals in Moscow weren't really paid much, and trying to earn money was punishable by imprisonment.
      2. +1
        3 November 2025 22: 11
        I visited many places during the Soviet era. The wealthiest was "occupied" Lithuania. It was a food paradise, even compared to Belarus. But the worst situation was in Russia, with the exception of Moscow, Leningrad, and a few closed cities.
    2. -1
      3 November 2025 18: 19
      I don't know why, but there were a lot of people interested in it in the comments.
      https://topwar.ru/272958-mid-rf-rossija-v-ljubyh-uslovijah-obespechit-potrebnosti-kaliningrada.html
    3. 0
      3 November 2025 18: 43
      Such condemnation of "feeding parasites" might be valid, but we're seeing the alternative right now—nuclear warheads and other NATO equipment right under Russia's borders, as well as the loss of the Baltics and other troubles. NATO isn't trying to "get rid of parasites"—it's rather trying to use these countries as much as possible as a buffer, a beachhead, or a meat shield. Finally, many of the allied socialist countries also supplied the USSR with various goods, from bananas and shoes to cars and airplanes, and therefore weren't "freeloaders."
    4. +1
      3 November 2025 20: 24
      Quote: HAM
      But why do we need THIS? Feed the Baltic parasites again, turning them into a "showcase"...? No, no way, you won't get that!... It seems that in the West this is exactly what they're dreaming about - to dump the parasites back on us.

      Hi, we once made a showcase in the Baltics.
    5. +1
      3 November 2025 20: 37
      Quote: HAM
      Again, feed the Baltic parasites, turning them into a "showcase"...?

      No way! If we're going to revive the USSR, we'll do it selectively. And we don't need the Baltics at all.
      1. +1
        3 November 2025 21: 30
        Quote: Egoza
        And we don't need the Balts at all.

        Well, let them all go to their gayrope, no one will stop them this time.
    6. 0
      3 November 2025 21: 26
      Quote: HAM
      Once again, feed the Baltic parasites, turning them into a "showcase"...

      There's absolutely no need to turn the Baltics into a showcase; the country needs the Baltic ports and coastline like air. Of course, someone living in Makhachkala or Uryupinsk won't understand this.
  7. +5
    3 November 2025 18: 02
    ❝ After the victory over Ukraine, the Russian president will begin to revive the USSR ❞ —

    — “Whoever does not regret the collapse of the USSR has no heart.
    And the one who wants to restore it as before,
    "That one has no head" © ...
    1. +1
      3 November 2025 20: 00
      Most likely, when an American speaks about the USSR, he means something completely different from what our former compatriots think.
    2. +1
      3 November 2025 20: 40
      Quote: Vladimir Vladimirovich Vorontsov
      “Whoever does not regret the collapse of the USSR has no heart.
      And for the one who wants to restore it to its original form,
      "That one has no head."

      So we shouldn't be talking about the previous form. The main thing is that there was a conscience.
  8. +3
    3 November 2025 18: 09
    Former CIA officer: After victory over Ukraine, the Russian president will begin to revive the USSR.

    The USSR, under its current structure, cannot be restored. It became possible only with the construction of socialism, when the driving force of progress was not capital or private ownership of natural resources, but the enthusiasm of productive forces fueled that very growth in production (not GDP). It was then that it was possible to complete the five-year plan in four years.
    What should be done today? Should we give Forbes a bunch of bad, greedy billionaires? Or should we ensure GDP growth by raising prices and tariffs?
    Let's try to distract the population from pressing problems with a new utopia...
    1. -2
      3 November 2025 20: 01
      The USSR was made possible by the virtually free labor of Russians. And yes, you're right, that's no longer possible.
      1. -1
        3 November 2025 22: 29
        Why only Russians? The wage rates were the same throughout the entire Soviet Union. Well, maybe there were some northern supplements. Almost all my relatives went to Russia, to the North, to earn money. Some to Karelia, some to Vorkuta. The only thing is that of all the republics, only Russia and Belarus were donors. The rest were all subsidized.
        1. 0
          3 November 2025 22: 46
          Because if a factory was built somewhere in Churkestania, the workers were brought in from Russia. Strange, isn't it?
          1. 0
            4 November 2025 10: 55
            What's so strange about that? Building a factory requires specialists. Here in Belarus, the overwhelming majority of Russians living in the republic are those who came to build factories and stayed. In the Soviet Union, when they started building a factory, they immediately started building housing. So people came to get apartments.
            1. 0
              4 November 2025 11: 02
              The strange thing was that even thirty years later there were not many locals among the workers, but Russians continued to be brought in.
        2. 0
          4 November 2025 10: 23
          The only thing is that of all the republics, only Russia and Belarus were donors. The rest were all subsidized.

          How many times can you repeat these memorized psalms?! Was the Ukrainian SSR, on par with the West Germans in economic power, a subsidized republic? Was the Kazakh SSR, where factory chimneys smoked into the sky from every district center, also a parasite? Did the Uzbek SSR, where even children toiled like horses in the cotton fields, not earn enough to sustain the squalor I witnessed there during the Soviet era? Was Azerbaijan's oil not enough to justify the status of "breadwinner"? And everyone else was pretty much the same. Everyone lived by the same labor laws, operated under the same Gosplan, and had the same opportunities.
          And notice! "Historians" like you, up until 2015, included Ukraine among the donor republics of the Soviet Union. Well, because they weren't "churkas." Slavs, Orthodox Christians, and all that. And then there's the SVO... We have to change our tune. Inconvenient, right?
          1. 0
            4 November 2025 10: 48
            It's not about where and how the chimneys smoked. It's about who contributed how much to the Union budget and how much they took from it. The pro-Ukrainian lobby in the Politburo, from the Khrushchev era onward, constantly pulled the blanket over itself. The Baltic republics were a whole other story. Have you seen much produce from these republics in Russia? I haven't seen any at all. Meanwhile, Belarus practically fed the megacities of Moscow and Leningrad. And Belarusians themselves went to Lithuania for sausages.
            1. +1
              4 November 2025 10: 57
              Have you seen many products from these republics in Russia?

              Yes, I saw a lot of products from the republics on the shelves.
              Young man, you haven't studied history very carefully. In the USSR, money existed solely as a means of communication between the state and the population. And even that was considered a dying element. Money played no role in the economy at all. A plan was handed down to the enterprise. Components were supplied by other enterprises according to the same plan. The plan was strict for EVERYONE! Calculating the share of each enterprise, much less the entire republic, was impossible because no one needed it. All those speculations about "we worked harder than you, but we were fed less" are just that: speculation. No one could calculate anything in numbers back then, and now... even less!
              Don't make such loud statements.
              1. +1
                4 November 2025 11: 01
                Wow, you really didn't live under the Soviet Union if you believe such nonsense...
                1. 0
                  4 November 2025 11: 04
                  Wow, you really didn't live under the Soviet Union if you believe such nonsense...

                  I even managed to work for Soviet rubles. Two years before serving in the Soviet Army.
                  1. 0
                    4 November 2025 11: 13
                    What are you even talking about? And where did you manage to do it? It must have been in the Baltics or Ukraine, God forgive me!
                    1. 0
                      4 November 2025 21: 33
                      Well, judging by your written accent, it's clearly not me from Ukraine. What did I manage to do? Soviet rubles—are they such a distant antiquity? I worked for Soviet rubles in Soviet Kazakhstan. What's wrong? The reason for your irony?
                      1. +1
                        4 November 2025 23: 42
                        Those who live in Russia don't talk like that. For us, both are just rubles.
                        By the way, your life was much more fun than ours. At least, life was better in Ust-Kamenorsk than in the Moscow region. The environment there was so-so, though, whereas Moscow was a bit of a snake pit back then, too.
                        Overall it’s worse than in Russia, I don’t even know where people lived in the USSR.
                      2. 0
                        4 November 2025 23: 51
                        Quote: Vatnik_
                        For us, both are just rubles.

                        Well, judging by the name, of course, yes, the Soviet ruble was not dependent on any foreign currencies.
                      3. +1
                        5 November 2025 00: 42
                        Well, it doesn't matter now. If you don't go on holiday abroad, then the exchange rate doesn't matter to you.
                      4. 0
                        5 November 2025 13: 55
                        Quote: Vatnik_
                        Well, it doesn't depend on it now.

                        Not quite so, due to the fact that pricing is still done in other currencies, we get inflation.
                      5. +1
                        5 November 2025 14: 47
                        So, the question is, how much of that inflation is due to the exchange rate? This isn't 1998, and the relationship is far from linear. So, where isn't there inflation?
                      6. 0
                        5 November 2025 16: 39
                        Quote: Vatnik_
                        Well, where is there no inflation?

                        I don't deny it, it's just that the exchange rate still has an impact on inflation.
                      7. 0
                        5 November 2025 17: 48
                        Of course there are, because there are imports. It's very noticeable on passenger cars, for example. But overall, the average person doesn't care about the exchange rate; it has no impact on their lives.
                      8. 0
                        5 November 2025 08: 57
                        Those who live in Russia don't talk like that. For us, both are just rubles.

                        I live in Russia and talk to Russians. Everyone, including me, talks about the huge difference between the Soviet ruble and the current one. What was so fun about Ust-Kaman? You've got me a bit puzzled here. Comrade Lako wrote above about how he took the commuter train to Vilnius to pick up Dzintars. Well, we've only seen those commuter trains in movies. Buses are our everything. We'd go to the neighboring regional center for laundry detergent and audio cassettes. We got sugar with coupons, even though the sugar factory in the village was working beyond its quota. The local station was jammed with sugar trains (referring to the breadwinners). I worked eight hours a day, five days a week (plus eighth Saturdays), on a construction site, and the salary was 150-180 rubles a month. Everyone worked. No one was given a salary for free. Who subsidized us?... How?... Russians are generally prone to delusions of grandeur. I worked as an ambulance driver in Bryansk for a long time. How many times did it happen that you'd show up to a call, and there'd be some drunk asshole lying under a fence in the mud, and "Oh! The chump's here!"
                        The Union heavily subsidized all sorts of loyal regimes abroad. I agree with that. But what about their own for free?! Come on!
                      9. The comment was deleted.
                      10. 0
                        5 November 2025 09: 49
                        This is an isolated incident. I personally had luck in Russia that I never dreamed of in Kazakhstan. But based on such a minor incident, I wouldn't jump to sweeping conclusions like, "We fed you, but we were left hungry." Stop spreading this nonsense.
                      11. 0
                        5 November 2025 09: 50
                        We didn’t just feed you, we created you from… and sticks!
                        If it weren't for the Russians, you would still be collecting manure in the steppe.
                      12. 0
                        5 November 2025 09: 54
                        Another "creator." Apparently, the "great arias" lying under the fence are a natural phenomenon that can't be useless. Like manure, for example. It smells bad, but it's good for plant growth. Good luck, oh great one!
                      13. 0
                        5 November 2025 10: 00
                        Well, you know what the joke is, collecting manure is not only your recent past, but also not in the distant future, because you, ******, don’t remember goodness
                      14. 0
                        5 November 2025 10: 05
                        Who are we? What makes you think I'm Kazakh? Dark-skinned, yes. I'm simply for the truth. And there's no truth in racism. "Italians built a car factory in Russia" means "did they teach you to pee standing up?" I didn't invent that expression. You can guess who. And collecting manure... Yes. I did it for a long time. Who haven't I picked up off the streets! And I'll never forget all that "good stuff" in the form of a bitten-off ear and a mangled spine.
                      15. 0
                        5 November 2025 10: 26
                        About the truth.
                        Everything that various dark-skinned people stole from Russians during the Soviet era is a debt. Sooner or later, one way or another, you will repay the Russians.
                        Think about it, don't forget.
              2. 0
                4 November 2025 11: 11
                You've gone too far with your boyfriend. And don't tell me here how things should be in your opinion. Since childhood, I remember the commuter train to Vilnius from Belarus being called the "road of life." And I used to take it with my mother on weekends to buy groceries. Because 100 kilometers from Lithuania, their sausages weren't even a whiff. But our city had its own meat-packing plant, from which products were regularly shipped to Leningrad and Moscow. And later, while living in Latvia, I brought Lima candies and Dzintars perfume to Belarus. They were looked upon there as French. L'Oréal. Buying these things in Russia or even Belarus was impossible. But in the republics themselves, they were all in every store.
                1. 0
                  4 November 2025 21: 36
                  Well, I didn't write it the way I thought it should have been. I wrote it to you the way it really was. And judging by your knowledge of our recent history, you are a very young and uninformed person. What's wrong?
                  1. 0
                    5 November 2025 10: 11
                    In that "modern history," under the Soviet Union, I lived, studied, and served in the Byelorussian SSR, Leningrad, the Latvian SSR, the Polish People's Republic, and northern Russia, from Leningrad to the Arkhangelsk region. And I saw where and how people lived. So don't tell me fairy tales here. I don't know what book you read them in.
                    1. 0
                      5 November 2025 10: 18
                      I thought I'd argued this "fairy tale" quite clearly above. I've been to many places, seen a lot. And your only argument is "you, *****, don't remember good things." But in fact, ***** are racists of all stripes, "creators" of... and sticks. I've seen plenty of them. Not a single smart or cultured one. Manure never smells good.
                      1. 0
                        5 November 2025 10: 26
                        What did you see there? If you'd been in those years, after the Baltics, in the Arkhangelsk region, where in the late 80s they had a rationing system, like after the war, even for tea, you'd have immediately forgotten your slogans.
                      2. 0
                        5 November 2025 10: 33
                        I didn't need to go to Arkhangelsk to see the rationing system. I saw it all on the spot. And I'm not chanting any slogans here. I repeat once again for the sake of the "highly developed Aryan" - I am for the truth. And it is somewhat different. For example, I, a "churka," continue to address you formally. And you, the "bearers of civilization," have sunk to the level of the barracks. Emotions - that's understandable. I have more of them, believe me! I got punched in the face for being Russian. I wiped my face for being a "churka." I am for the truth. And it is not what you paint it. It is different.
                      3. 0
                        5 November 2025 10: 47
                        Regarding the appeal, read your post above. It smacks of an insult, which could get you punched in the face. And where did you see racism in me? You're either reading between the lines or, stuck in your own ideas, making up whatever you want. I wrote about the different living conditions and provisions in the Soviet republics. And that's an obvious fact. I saw it with my own eyes. And people are all the same. And you're trying to talk racism into me here. What does that have to do with anything?
                      4. 0
                        5 November 2025 10: 50
                        I don't know what I should smell like after reading yours. I'm trying to restrain myself as best I can. Where's the racism? There it is:
                        Everything that various dark-skinned people stole from Russians during the USSR is debt.
                      5. 0
                        5 November 2025 10: 54
                        No, I didn't write that. Scroll up. It's a post by someone nicknamed "Vatnik." You need to read more carefully.
                      6. 0
                        5 November 2025 10: 55
                        I agree. My apologies.
    2. 0
      3 November 2025 20: 15
      Don't forget who hammered the first nail into the coffin of the USSR...it was bloody Khrushchev with his amnesty for the Banderites and the slander of I.V. Stalin!!!
      1. +4
        3 November 2025 21: 32
        Quote: Lisa Kerner-Tymoshenko
        Don't forget who hammered the first nail into the coffin of the USSR...it was bloody Khrushchev with amnesty for Bandera's followers and slander against I.V. Stalin!!!

        Half the country continues to live in Khrushchev-era buildings! But under Nikita Sergeevich, millions of families moved from dugouts, barracks, and all manner of ramshackle dwellings to apartments with hot water, gas, and central heating—not communal apartments, but private, comfortable housing. Schools, hospitals, and stadiums were built next to the Khrushchev-era buildings, and parks and squares were created. So, we shouldn't just denounce the failures; we should also remember the achievements.
        1. -1
          4 November 2025 08: 45
          Quote: 30 vis
          Quote: Lisa Kerner-Tymoshenko
          Don't forget who hammered the first nail into the coffin of the USSR...it was bloody Khrushchev with amnesty for Bandera's followers and slander against I.V. Stalin!!!

          Half the country continues to live in Khrushchev-era buildings! But under Nikita Sergeevich, millions of families moved from dugouts, barracks, and all manner of ramshackle dwellings to apartments with hot water, gas, and central heating—not communal apartments, but private, comfortable housing. Schools, hospitals, and stadiums were built next to the Khrushchev-era buildings, and parks and squares were created. So, we shouldn't just denounce the failures; we should also remember the achievements.

          Let me remind you that "Khrushchev-era" buildings were developed under Stalin's rule; sometimes years passed between plans and mass construction. Don't credit any Khrushchevites with fulfilling the state plan, which allocated funds and mobilized enormous production forces.
          1. -2
            4 November 2025 10: 01
            Quote: Dedrusav
            Let me remind you that the Khrushchev-era buildings were developed under Stalin's rule.

            And we had a lot of things developed under "Stalin". They built all sorts of special camps... it's incredible. They even built the Baikal-Amur Mainline..." But little was implemented. So, the merit of N.S., Khrushchev is enormous.
            1. -1
              4 November 2025 10: 06
              "Special camps" weren't built. The transit prisons built under Stolypin remained the foundation. No one created a new system, just as the current GUIN system is merely a continuation of the Gulag. But for you, only the Bolsheviks are beasts, while the Banderlya, Black Hundreds, White Bandits, and CIA agents are kindred spirits?
              1. -2
                4 November 2025 10: 08
                Quote: Dedrusav
                But for you, only the Bolsheviks are beasts, and the Banderites, Black Hundreds, White Bandits, and CIA agents are kindred spirits?

                This is your conclusion... For me, the most important thing in a person is conscience and decency. For example, who is Comrade Shoigu?
                1. -1
                  4 November 2025 10: 10
                  Please change the subject; my conclusion seems quite accurate. Don't get carried away; keep your hatred and love in moderation. All the best.
      2. -2
        3 November 2025 22: 48
        Ukrainians are like that.... They nibble...
  9. 0
    3 November 2025 18: 10
    A former CIA officer believes that Vladimir Putin's plans include at least a military takeover of the Baltic republics and even PolandThus, Baker continues to fantasize, the Russian leader intends to revive the Soviet Union.

    And when was Poland part of the USSR? I'd like to repeat Lavrov's famous quote here, but the rules don't allow it.
    1. +5
      3 November 2025 18: 28
      Quote: guest
      And when was Poland part of the USSR?

      I.V. Stalin also said: "No thanks, we had our fill of Poland under the tsars."
      1. 0
        3 November 2025 21: 25
        Quote: carpenter
        I.V. Stalin also said

        Well, this enemy employee apparently hadn’t heard of this quote from Stalin. laughing
  10. +2
    3 November 2025 18: 14
    Regarding Tribaltika: why not get back what’s ours?
    These lands were once purchased from the Swedes for a considerable sum. And yes, all the extras and nonsense weren't stipulated in the sales contract, but were included as a bonus. We can send them off to the four corners of Europe.
    1. 0
      3 November 2025 18: 20
      ...the limitrophes' worst nightmare - the territory has come under Russian jurisdiction, and they're all out with their suitcases packed... belay wassat this is the end for them...

      For us it's worse than a nightmare (c) I don't remember where... laughing
      (meaning for them)

      No, well, let me at least fantasize about this topic... wassat
    2. +1
      3 November 2025 20: 17
      Land and people are two different things.
      Do you really need these Russophobic Balts and Madame Kaka Callas?
      1. +1
        3 November 2025 21: 52
        That's what I'm saying: our land is ours, and we're letting the bastards and nonsense go to Europe.
    3. ANB
      0
      3 November 2025 23: 24
      And yes: all sorts of nonsense and nonsense were not stipulated in the sales contract,

      They were bought too.
      Quote from the Treaty of Nystad:
      . with all the inhabitants and settlements on these islands, as well as in the above-mentioned provinces, cities and places
      1. 0
        4 November 2025 09: 18
        Well, those Labus and Chukhontsy had long since died out. There was no talk of the current ones.
        1. ANB
          0
          4 November 2025 10: 32
          If you bought a cow and a bull, whose calf is it?
          1. 0
            4 November 2025 16: 04
            The calf is ours. But mangy animals are usually driven out of the herd.
  11. +1
    3 November 2025 18: 30
    This is the opinion of former US Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) officer Michael Baker. According to him, the Russian president will certainly not stop there after his victory over Ukraine. The former CIA officer believes that Vladimir Putin's plans include, at a minimum, a military takeover of the Baltic republics and even Poland.

    Why do we need them anyway? Or will we? ))) Moreover, they'll come crawling back when the EU soon collapses and the economy there collapses so much... that the dissatisfied, needy people will either rise in revolution against the anti-people elites who have usurped power, or they will need to be urgently disposed of last, sent to war... What the Russophobic Western elites will choose is clear - the superfluous and undesirable - for the meat grinder... )))
    Well, and again, most likely, it smells like fried food from Europe, and besides - "meat fried", so these of ours, recently - close (but betrayed), will immediately remember their roots and real saviors...))) In general, they will crawl themselves.., soon (there will not even be any need to conquer them) .., but, I don’t even know, is it worth saving them then, once again, and helping them? Or, maybe it will be better to let them, slowly but surely, bend over and go into oblivion - where they deserve? )
  12. 0
    3 November 2025 18: 32
    That's right, restore the USSR, in a slightly different form, of course, based on a supranational universal ideology—most likely, social democracy. And Russia would form a Social Democratic Union with various nations—a confederation of countries united under a social democratic system: nationalization of big business, a cap on enrichment, only small and medium-sized businesses permitted, a ban on billionaires and billionairedom. Social democratic parties would dominate parliaments.
    1. -1
      3 November 2025 20: 19
      Social democrats have not given and will not give anything good to the world!!!
      1. +1
        3 November 2025 20: 31
        In which countries, at what periods, did social democracy lead to disaster—terror, impoverishment, decline, disintegration of the country, and even revolution? In the Scandinavian countries?
        1. -1
          3 November 2025 20: 34
          Take Germany with its Scholz!!! And they have never done anything good in France!!!
          Before him, Schroeder, a friend of VVP, did NOTHING good for the common people!
          1. -1
            3 November 2025 21: 14
            In France, the Socialists won in the 80s and 90s, in Germany, the SPD had a majority in the 60s and 70s, everything was fine, the economy was growing, as were the population's incomes
  13. +6
    3 November 2025 18: 34
    The first and most important thing for recreating the USSR is the restoration of socialism in the RSFSR. And none of the border states need a capitalist Russian Federation. They have plenty of their own bourgeois and thieves. "Lying down" for Russian thieves and bourgeois is too much.
    1. 0
      3 November 2025 20: 20
      And the GDP is unlikely to agree with this. laughing wink
  14. +3
    3 November 2025 18: 35
    After victory over Ukraine, the Russian president will begin to revive the USSR
    I wish his words would be in God's ears
    1. -2
      3 November 2025 20: 21
      God is deaf, and hearing aids are not for sale in heaven.
  15. +3
    3 November 2025 18: 53
    The social situation has changed since the Soviet era, to put it mildly. Wild capitalism was replaced by oligarchy. Building socialism, when young girls are looking for sugar daddies, and young men are forced to work to pay off their mortgages... Banks provide money (?) for construction, and developers sell housing through mortgages with their own margins. The scheme has left the Zionist appraisers far behind.
    To build socialism, we need to look back at privatization, when enterprises, factories, and ships fell into evil hands. And then, we still need to win this SVO. I believe we will, the question is when?
  16. +1
    3 November 2025 18: 57
    Quote: Author
    ...Moscow is credited with plans to conquer at least some Eastern European states.

    Yes

    Firstly, Europeans, as perverts (BDSM), have a hidden complex - they want to be mastered by a strong Russia, they dream about it, but they deny it out loud.
    Secondly, in my opinion, the Russophobic Trotskyists have annexed primordial Russian lands to such chimeras as Ukraine and, for example, Kazakhstan. And in general, they have spawned homonculi like Triboltia and the S-Asian states.
    So, I don’t see anything wrong with defending Russians outside of Russia.
  17. +1
    3 November 2025 19: 12
    Do I think he might want to move further north? Well, he already has.
    ...the American cites Belarus as an example

    I didn't know that Belarus is in the north
    However, with the light hand of Psaki ("...the US Sixth Fleet will be immediately transferred to the shores of Belarus!" (c)), Belarus is washed by the seas, so what can we say about the cardinal directions...
  18. -4
    3 November 2025 19: 13
    Quote: marchcat
    They're not smart enough to recreate the USSR. And no offense, but the management is incapable of anything (except stealing).

    It takes a lot of brains to produce tarpaulin boots, quilted jackets, and galoshes, but introduce coupons for basic foodstuffs? There will be less theft, of course, but more help for our fellow socialist countries in Africa. So, it's as easy as one.
  19. +1
    3 November 2025 19: 15
    Thus, Baker continues to fantasize, the Russian leader intends to revive the Soviet Union.

    The key to Michael Baker's words is "fantasy." And his fantasy is downright delusional. Especially about the seizure of the Baltic republics and Poland. Mr. Baker is apparently completely unfamiliar with the representatives of these "states," otherwise he would have realized that such a "gift" would be of no use to anyone.
  20. +2
    3 November 2025 19: 28
    Z článku je jasně vidět, že nacisté z CIA vůbec neznají psychologii Ruska a Slovanských národů okolo. Slovani ví velmi dobře, že Rusko nemělo nikdy ambice bezdůvdně napadat cizí země, jen právem dlalo, aby se dodržovalo uzemí sféry vlivu dané dohadami západu a východu. Proto Slovanské národy, hlavně obyčejní lidé nemají žádný strach, že by je Rusko napadlo! A když ano, vlastně by každý takový stát osvobodilo od nascistů stejně jako Ukrajinu. Ale to po Rusku napadeného západem a také Slovanskými vazali, nemůže vůbec nikdo chtít. My okolní Slovanské státy si za svoji situaci můžeme sami, protože jsme špatně volili a zavčasu jsme nepoznali, že na nás zapad - USA nachystal léčku. Ukrajina jako poslední se do této západní pasti chytila ​​a vůbec nic tím nezíská. Naopak přijde o 2 miliony zabitých ve válce, 20 milonů opustilo Ukrajinu, země je na mnoha místech zničená a je bez peněz, v bankrotu. Ukrajina má pověst nejvíce zkorumpované země světa, s nejvíce nacistů, které neustále oslavuje stavěním soch Banderovi, Šuchevyčovi a také po nich jmenuje ulice. Mládež vychovává k agresivitě ak nenávisti k Rusku, což je varující pro celou Evropu. Ukrajina je vlastně největším nebezpečím pro Evropu, spolu s nejvíce nacistickými státy jako je Anglie a Německo. To co napsal bývalý šéf CIA je z jeho strany asi chytrá provokace, protože si velmi nepřeje, aby USA přišla o vliv na státy východního bloku Evropy, které tak dlouho a pracně pod svůj vliv dostalo všelijakými machynacemi a podvody, často i volebními. Rusko ví, že nemusí nikoho napadat, Slovanské státy už se sami pomalu přiklání k Rusku, ke kterému máme všichni blíž, než k nacistickému západu. Dokonce jsem přesvědčen, že většina Slovanských států bude mít s Ruskem lepší vztahy jako v dobách komunismu. Moderní svět se ubírá také díky Rusku správným směrem jako je BRISC, kde už nezáleží na velikosti států, ale na jejich vůli být přátelské země a obchodovat na vzájemné výhodnosti.
    1. +7
      3 November 2025 19: 29
      The article makes it clear that the CIA Nazis are completely ignorant of the psychology of Russia and the surrounding Slavic peoples. The Slavs know full well that Russia never had any ambitions to brazenly invade other countries; it simply did so to ensure that the sphere of influence granted by the West and the East was respected. This is precisely why the Slavic peoples, especially the common people, do not fear a Russian invasion! And if that happened, it would effectively liberate every state, like Ukraine, from the Nazis. But no one can wish for that after Russia was attacked by the West, as well as by its Slavic vassals. We, the surrounding Slavic states, are to blame for our situation, because we made the wrong choice and failed to realize in time that the West – the United States – had set a trap for us. Ukraine was the last to fall into this Western trap and has nothing to gain from it. On the contrary, it will lose 2 million killed in the war, 20 million have left Ukraine, and the country is devastated in many places, penniless, and bankrupt. Ukraine has a reputation as the most corrupt country in the world, with the largest number of Nazis, whom it constantly glorifies by erecting monuments to Bandera and Shukhevych and naming streets after them. It is raising its youth to be aggressive and hateful of Russia, which serves as a warning to all of Europe. Ukraine actually poses the greatest danger to Europe, along with Nazi countries like England and Germany. What the former CIA chief wrote is likely a cunning provocation on his part, since he genuinely does not want the US to lose influence over the Eastern Bloc states of Europe, which it has painstakingly subjugated for so long through all sorts of machinations and fraud, often including election fraud. Russia knows it doesn't need to attack anyone: Slavic states are already gradually leaning toward Russia, to which we are increasingly closer than to the Nazi West. I'm even convinced that most Slavic states will have better relations with Russia than they did under communism. The modern world is also moving in the right direction thanks to Russia, for example within the BRICS, where the size of states no longer matters, but rather their desire to be friendly and trade on a mutually beneficial basis.
  21. +1
    3 November 2025 19: 28
    What difference does it make to us what our enemies are weaving? First, destroy everyone, second, destroy those within.
  22. -1
    3 November 2025 19: 42
    Come to think of it... Russia's leadership may try to bring some of its former allies back under its control...
    Not now, in the future...
    The process is complex and not quick, there is nothing more to say about it... for now, at least.
    1. +3
      3 November 2025 19: 57
      Ani se nemusíte pokoušet, my menší státy bývalého bloku přijdeme sami, ne pro sféru vlivu, ale provzájemné přátelství a výměný obhod. Víme moc dobře jaké hodnoty Rusko zastává a že není pro Slovanské národ žádným nebezpečím. Rusko opět zachraňuje svět před velkou válkou a je moc dobře, že má velmi dobré vztahy s Čínou a Indií.
      1. +8
        3 November 2025 19: 58
        You don't even have to try. We, the small states of the former bloc, will come on our own, not for a sphere of influence, but for mutual friendship and trade. We know perfectly well what values ​​Russia stands for, and that it poses no threat to the Slavic peoples. Russia is once again saving the world from a major war, and it's great that it has excellent relations with China and India.
        1. +1
          3 November 2025 21: 26
          To attract someone into the orbit of your influence you need... yes, you need a lot of things!!!
          Unfortunately, we ourselves don’t have enough of everything.
  23. +4
    3 November 2025 19: 49
    The USSR is a classless society, devoid of exploitative capitalists. Putin has no intention of changing the economic and political order. He is a supporter of capitalism. Therefore, there can be no USSR in principle. It's very strange that a CIA agent doesn't know the basics of how the USSR worked.
    1. +1
      3 November 2025 20: 15
      Putin is understandable, but he's already old. The question is what forces will come after him, and that will be soon. Will it be another 20-30 years of oligarchy dominance, or will it be radical change and the rise to power of left-wing popular forces (those who talk like the Communist Party of the Russian Federation, but, unlike the Communist Party, immediately implement their words and win)?
    2. +1
      3 November 2025 20: 31
      What do these Washingtonians know about the USSR or Russia...even though the son of that bastard Khrushchev "taught" at American universities until his death...
  24. +2
    3 November 2025 19: 59
    Don't be afraid, Washingtonians! VVP doesn't dream of reviving the USSR, as he, like his teacher, the late A. Sobchak, is a rabid anti-Soviet. Evidence: the Yeltsin Center and VVP's admiration for a certain scribbler named Solzhenitsyn. sad
  25. +3
    3 November 2025 20: 13
    Dreams, dreams... A naive ex-CIA employee. That's probably why he's ex.
  26. +3
    3 November 2025 20: 20
    Yes, indeed, further proof that they knew how to do things well back then! The USSR has been gone for 34 years, and yet the West still fears even the thought of its revival! laughing
  27. -4
    3 November 2025 20: 23
    And on what basis should we revive them? Feed everyone again and carry the weight of the burden? So that their descendants will have another reason to hate the "Russian occupation"? Maybe we should immediately revive the Council for Mutual Economic Assistance (CMEA), to ensure there's no extra money left in the treasury?
  28. +1
    3 November 2025 20: 24
    Quote: Igor Belobrov
    Dreams, dreams... A naive ex-CIA employee. That's probably why he's ex.

    He simply voiced one of the horror stories popular in the West. Self-promotion and nothing more.
  29. -2
    3 November 2025 20: 34
    You won't get it! You idiots are dreaming! Russia began to develop and live normally after the collapse of the USSR and the rise of adequate leaders. After the war, the only thing that needs to be done is to establish cooperation with the elites of the border states. So that they don't even think about dragging Western structures into their territory to the detriment of Russia. Otherwise, let them live as they please.
  30. +1
    3 November 2025 20: 35
    Russia will begin to revive the USSR


    I don't even want to discuss such nonsense. Many countries, including China, are against it.
    ButIf Russia succeeds in ensuring rapid economic growth, it will be able to win back and retain its neighbors within its sphere of economic, political, and military interests.
  31. 0
    3 November 2025 20: 52
    Former CIA officer: After victory over Ukraine, the Russian president will begin to revive the USSR.

    Well, what can I say? He didn't study at our Higher Command School, at the very least, and at the Institute of Computing, at the most. I hope the staff at the "station" at the US Embassy in Moscow understand. lol wassat tongue
  32. +1
    3 November 2025 21: 04
    The comrade is right. Rebuilding a great country like the USSR is the right direction; we just need to correct our mistakes.
  33. -1
    3 November 2025 21: 23
    It's funny when the enemies of the USSR, who for 35 years after the creation of their state have been only parasitizing on the results of the labor of Soviet communists and their supporters, and imports, crucify themselves that they fed someone in the USSR.
    And by the very fact that they did this, they caused colossal and irreparable damage to the created State and its people, but they still boast that they want to repeat something similar.
  34. +2
    3 November 2025 21: 52
    Will the President begin to revive the USSR?!
    They'll strangle you at the first attempt.
    They didn't take it apart just to let it be taken away!
    And they will never get enough!
    Socialism from above is a utopia!
  35. +1
    3 November 2025 21: 54
    Will he return the "USSR" with a draped mausoleum?
  36. 0
    3 November 2025 22: 49
    What USSR!? Abkhazia, Tajikistan, and Uzbekistan are sitting comfortably on our shoulders; we can barely support them, and if we were to gather the rest of these parasites, it would be a disaster.
  37. -1
    3 November 2025 22: 51
    The goal was to liquidate socialism in the USSR, and at the same time it was liquidated.
    Who will give permission to liquidate capitalism in the Russian Federation and restore socialism?
  38. -1
    4 November 2025 02: 20
    Will the ruble become equal to the dollar and the euro? If so, a revival of the USSR is possible. If not, then no, the dollar and the euro are colonial currencies, just like the US, the EU, and the British rule colonies. That's not certain!
  39. 0
    4 November 2025 04: 26
    Americans, even those in high administrative or government positions, display a striking ignorance of history and geopolitics.
    As the author of the article accurately notes, it seems that this man does not even understand what the Soviet Union was and what states were part of it.

    If anyone believes that Poland was part of the USSR, this demonstrates a complete lack of knowledge in the field of international relations.

    On the other hand, he does not provide any arguments why the Russian Federation should attack the Republic of Poland, a country whose military potential is many times greater than that of Ukraine.
    The Ukrainian Armed Forces, by contrast, possess an extremely diverse arsenal: from old post-Soviet equipment from the late 20th century to isolated examples of modern Western weaponry imported from various countries. However, the lack of proper training for soldiers renders this potential fragmented and ineffective in combat.

    A complete confrontation between the Russian Federation and Poland is a purely hypothetical scenario that would only make sense in the event of a massive attack by Warsaw on Moscow.

    The calculations of both sides of the barricade coincide, and I believe that, despite the intensification of political and diplomatic rhetoric, this option remains marginal and, in essence, absurd.

    Moreover, such an attack would undoubtedly provoke an extremely strong military response from NATO.

    What he says is simply a collection of nonsense told late at night over a glass of American bourbon.
  40. 0
    4 November 2025 09: 27
    Quote: Nord11
    What USSR!? Abkhazia, Tajikistan, and Uzbekistan are sitting comfortably on our shoulders; we can barely support them, and if we were to gather the rest of these parasites, it would be a disaster.

    Yeah, basically it's already a "USSR on a shoestring." Now if only we could bring the Baltics back into the fold, it would be completely consistent. ;) My point is, the USSR had its pros and cons. In any case, a lot of things have become outdated over the past 30-plus years.
  41. 0
    4 November 2025 10: 10
    You have not been active as a commentator for a long time (write comments). Voting is prohibited.
  42. 0
    4 November 2025 11: 23
    Thus, Baker continues to fantasize, the Russian leader intends to revive the Soviet Union.
    Well...
    First of all, the Russian leader has no intention of doing so. He's a liberal.
    Secondly: there is nothing wrong with FIXING BUGS: if the new one doesn’t work, you need to go back to the old one that worked (any engineer will confirm this).
    Thirdly: pay attention to the chevrons on the boys’ front.
    On VERY many people the proud name is USSR.
    So, there is a DEMAND for the revival of the Motherland. And there is someone to do it.
  43. +2
    4 November 2025 13: 08
    Quote: Montezuma
    Quote: rocket757
    And in general, what can they create or restore?

    Crimea has been returned, and four more regions of former Ukraine are being returned to the Russian Federation. Isn't this a restoration of historical justice and a strengthening of state sovereignty, or is it something else entirely?

    Four years, four years – Karl! The Red Army almost liberated the lost territory in that period. It came out and restored the USSR's state border, Karl! You want to justify those incompetents behind the Red Wall? I'm not talking about the guys who fight, so you and everyone else understand correctly. I've said more than once that incompetents are incapable of winning – they're from the 90s. "Fixed matches" is their style, and it seems they're not fazed by it. "This one" keeps saying he's ready for a "fixed match." What can you expect from a character who slept with a gun under his bed back then? Most of us had something to fear, having pennies, and often no salary at all? And none of you slept with a gun under your bed, trembling in fear that someone would come for the stolen "bucks" – "he" decided not to talk about it, but logic dictates that's how it happened. This is the one you've decided to call your own... Do you think Langley doesn't know about the skeletons in "this one"'s closet? They do, that's why the Pin-dos act so confident. I'm talking about that same sacramental "deep" state, not that illiterate Red Clown - Torn Ear! sad
  44. 0
    5 November 2025 12: 38
    There is no point in fighting the Baltic tigers, nor in capturing them. You can sit on the riverbank and watch them disperse to other countries, while the rest die.
  45. 0
    5 November 2025 16: 41
    The Russian leader intends to revive the Soviet Union.

    What will he revive? Don't make me laugh. For 25 years he couldn't reach an agreement with Belarus, and he slept through Ukraine and Kazakhstan...
    With leaders like these, soon Russia will be reduced to pieces...
    1. 0
      5 November 2025 16: 45
      Quote: assault
      With leaders like these, soon Russia will be reduced to pieces...

      Although I have become a little disappointed over the last almost 4 years, he is still not Yeltsin or Gorbachev, who really ruined the country.
      1. 0
        5 November 2025 16: 46
        But he is not a leader capable of developing and strengthening the country, he is a weak, C-grade student...
        1. 0
          5 November 2025 16: 55
          In 2000, Russia and China had practically the same share of GDP: 3-3,5%; in 25, China was the world leader, the leading economy, while we had “stability” and the same 3% of GDP...
          Almost all former Soviet republics have turned their backs on Russia, many have become outright enemies, NATO is on Russia's borders—this is a clear example of the "wise" foreign policy of the leader and his team...
          The economy of two pipelines, gas and oil, is collapsing under the impact of sanctions...
          1. 0
            6 November 2025 01: 22
            Quote: assault
            Almost all former Soviet republics have turned away from Russia.

            Well, this is still the alcoholic's "merit".
            1. 0
              6 November 2025 11: 25
              Well, this is still the alcoholic's "merit".


              After the "alcoholic," his protégé had a huge amount of time and opportunity to rectify the situation and build good-neighborly relations with most of the former Soviet republics...
              The biggest "screw-up" in foreign policy is Ukraine, which, under the alcoholic's "heir," has become a country hostile to Russia...
              1. 0
                6 November 2025 13: 34
                Quote: assault
                The biggest "screw-up" in foreign policy is Ukraine, which, under the alcoholic's "heir," has become a country hostile to Russia...

                The process of turning Ukraine into an anti-Russian state took place under the alcoholic; I witnessed it myself, but the result of this process has already been inherited by the "heir."
                1. 0
                  6 November 2025 14: 06
                  I was also there in 2005-2006 (Kharkiv, Kyiv) and Ukraine then was not anti-Russia, but rather almost Russia.
                  There were anti-Russian activists, but only in isolated instances...
                  1. 0
                    6 November 2025 16: 25
                    Quote: assault
                    I've been there too

                    It's one thing to happen, but I lived and studied there in the early 90s.
  46. 0
    5 November 2025 17: 36
    Again, the main songs are about the old... What USSR? The overfed nouveau riche? Right now, I'll run left... While there are still people who remember the USSR, maybe they can handle it, but then there will be no time for it, the steamroller of propaganda won't pull this strap... You can't cut off the branch that feeds you... The people, having received freedom from -ism, are already ready to board up the mausoleum of the helmsman of the USSR with parade boards, so the best cure for the dizziness of glory is the free sale and carrying of weapons. Only then will self-purification occur.