"For the crew on the ship - uniform number 3, first term!"

24 497 208
"For the crew on the ship - uniform number 3, first term!"

Dedicated to the ships and crews of the naval units of the border troops...

A phone call from an old friend. The usual dialogue: “How are you? How’s your family? When did you get back?” — “It’s the same as always, everything’s normal for my age... Say hi to you from home! Shall we meet up and hang out?” — “Let’s have a beer this weekend, at the same bar.” — “Deal. You owe me the roach.” — “Okay.”



And again, just like before: "Do you remember... Did you have a lot of crazy people?" - "Are you kidding? We had a selection process - wow! Well, like everywhere else... Every first one!" - "I bet you didn't have any like us?! For beer!" - "Come on!" - "Listen, you had a patrol boat nicknamed "Mad"?" - "Well, there was such a thing..." - "Tell me, don't keep me in suspense!" - "First, let's have some roach... And beer!"... And then begins a story that could only happen in a movie or a book...

I'll tell you from the first person, although my fellow soldiers from the 2nd Brigade were involved in the events... I still remember the real circumstances...

Well, here we go…

To begin with, a little about these cheerful guys from the naval units of the border troops, or “Kamchatka border guards” for short.
Talking about Kamchatka's geography is a waste of time; just look at the map. It's cool, there's plenty of water, animals, and fish, lots of snow, volcanoes, and geysers with sulfur springs. There are few people, and those who are there are all sailors, fishermen, and ship repairmen—in other words, everyone revolves around the sea. There's an airport, several shipyards, fish processing plants, a port, and a whole host of military personnel of all stripes and varieties.


Kamchatka Peninsula

There's everyone there - pilots, sailors, tankers, and so on, and so on, and so on... And among all this wealth - the border guard sailors themselves.

Reference (composition of forces and means, in military terms)


By the early 1980s, the 1st Red Banner Border Patrol Ship Division (1st KDIPSK) was deployed in Kamchatka, based on a separate brigade. It consisted of two brigades, a division of transport ships, a group of boats, a headquarters, and supply and ship repair units. The division inherited the number—military unit 2376. By that time, the KTP (Red Banner Pacific Border District) had been divided, creating a separate Kamchatka Border District with headquarters in Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky, demonstrating the importance the state attached to the region.


Salt Lake Bay

The 1st Brigade (1 BPSCR, military unit 9870) consisted of the flagship
- a veteran of the border service, the Project 52 PSKR Purga cruiser, armed with a 4x100 mm B-34USM main caliber and six 2x37 mm ZU-21-M anti-aircraft guns, built between 1938 and 1957 (decommissioned in 1990), with a displacement of 3800 tons;
- 5 rank 1 PSKR project 97P with KA-27 helicopters on board (1x2x76 mm AK-726 + 2xAK-630, displacement 4500 tons);
- 5 PSKR 2nd rank project 745P (2xAK-230, displacement 1500 tons).

The Project 97P navigated smoothly through half-meter-thick ice, and if not overzealous, it could even overcome almost a meter, but only with great care and unhurried pace. The Project 745P was confident in ice up to 30 cm thick, and could even overcome half a meter if the ice was fresh.


PSKR 1st rank "Purga" project 52. Displacement of 3800 tons, maximum speed of 17 knots, crew of 219 people (during the war - 284). Armament: 4x1 - 100 mm universal artillery mounts "B-34USM" (ammunition 1094 rounds), 4x2 - 37 mm anti-aircraft machine guns "V-11M" (total ammunition 14.000 rounds), 4 mortars "BMB-2" (12 depth charges), 12 depth charges on racks, 30 mines type "KB". With an ice thickness of 18 cm developed a speed of 10 knots.


Project 97P "Iceberg" surface-to-surface missile cruiser. Avacha Bay. 1989.


Project 745P Kamchatka surface-to-surface cruiser

The 2nd Brigade (2 BPSKR, military unit 9871) consisted at that time of old Project 264 naval minesweepers being decommissioned (there were 2 units left at that time), replaced by 2nd rank ships (according to the MChPV classification) of Project 1124P, of which there were already 5 units at that time (Bditelny, Bezuprechny, Zorky, Reshitelny, Smely), and at that time - 2 1st rank PSKR of Project 11351P with a displacement of 3600 tons and a speed of 31 knots (Dzerzhinsky since 1984 and 70 years of the VChK-KGB since 1988) with a helicopter on board, the number of which should have been increased to 3 units.


PSKR "Vorovsky" project 264A


PSKR "Bditelny", project 1124P, 1985. Displacement 1065 tons, speed 35 knots, 1x2 Osa-MA SAM launchers (20 9M-33 SAMs); 1x2 57-mm AK-725; 2x2 533-mm TA (8 53-65K and SET-65 torpedoes); 2x12 RBU-6000 (48 RGB-60 depth charges); 2 release gear (12 RGM depth charges)


PSKR "Dzerzhinsky" pr. 11351P 1x2 PU ZIF-122 SAM "Osa-MA2" (20 missiles), 1x1x100-mm AK-100; 2x6x30mm AK-630M; 2x4 533 mm TA; 2x12 RBU-6000 (96 RSL-60 bombs); Helicopter Ka-27PS

The division of transport ships consisted of two Project 1595P transports with a displacement of 4500 tons (incidentally, by border standards, quite fast – its maximum speed was 17 knots), a tanker, and another old Project 229 transport.

The boat group consisted of a flagship "admiral's" boat, usually moored on keel blocks at the base pier, and four to six Project 1496 boats with a displacement of 102 tons. Some of these boats were stationed at border command posts: one at the Magadan border detachment (Nagaev Bay), one in Ust-Kamchatsk, assigned to the border command post, and one at the border command post in Severo-Kurilsk. Three to four boats were stationed at the division base in Solenoye Ozero Bay in Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky.

There was also a group of three Project 1496 boats and one T-4 (tank barge) as part of the 110th Border Detachment (Provideniya Bay, Chukotka). In 1990, this group was expanded into a 1st-rank boat division, reinforced by three new Project 1496 boats, specially built at the Sovetskaya Gavan shipyard. These very small boats, with a displacement of only 102 tons, completed the inter-base voyage from Sovetskaya Gavan to Provideniya Bay under their own power, albeit with an escort from the division's ships.

All of this was spinning, working and shooting, which was regularly practiced during exercises, including joint ones with fleet.


PSKA Project 1496 of the 110th Border Detachment, Providence Bay, Chukotka

All of this, except for the Chukotka Division, was united into the 1st Red Banner Division of Border Patrol Ships, abbreviated as the 1st KDIPS, the regular position of division commander being Captain 1st Rank.


Ships of the 1st division in Solenoe Ozero Bay



There were no ugly ships in the division. And the "heavy" artillery"in the form of the PSKR "Purga" since the 50s, and the hard workers of the projects 745P and 97P, and simply an arrow flying across the water, the beauties of the project 1124P, and the power of the project 11351P, which by that time had already decorated Solenoe Ozero Bay and took up almost all the free space in it...

The feat of the commander and crew of the PSKR "Bditelny"



PSKR pr.1124P

This ode is to "motorcycles", also known as "bicycles"... An ode to the 2nd rank border patrol ships of Project 1124P...
They earned these cheerful names for the cosmic roar of their turbines, especially at full speed, their speed, and their excellent maneuverability. These ships were also beautiful, and only a beautiful ship is good on the water. This project was intended to replace the old Project 264A naval minesweepers; they were built for the Pacific Theater of Operations at shipyards in Khabarovsk (this is the same shipyard that built the Project 1124P with the Osa SAM system) and Komsomolsk-on-Amur (they were built without the SAM system and with a different armament configuration).

We, the First Brigade, laughed at these delicate little ships, calling them "disposable" and "glass," but we valued them for their firepower and speed. After all, speed was precisely what we lacked for service—the enemy had faster fishing schooners and trawlers, and chasing US warships at our speeds was simply ridiculous...
By the way, about “disposable” – well, that’s a joke: there was an opinion that the Project 1124 was designed for 30 minutes of combat... Hmm...

And so in May 1987 they showed themselves in all their glory...

It must be said that a maritime border isn't just barbed wire and a plowed control strip. And as a service dog, it's not Julbars, but a couple thousand tons of steel and a few dozen tough guys...

The border line itself runs 12 nautical miles from the outermost points of the coastline. However, international maritime law also includes the concept of bays.

Historical According to the 1982 UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, bays can be declared internal waters of a country. Both the United States and the USSR had such historical bays. However, even then, the Americans attempted to challenge our country's right to do so, and not only from the podium, starting in the late 1960s. In the 1980s, in the Pacific theater of operations, the Americans attempted to assert their right not to consider our bays internal waters of the USSR in Peter the Great Bay and Avacha Bay. Naturally, we put a stop to this, responding to the situation. Little has changed now.

The main danger, of course, was for ours missile Submarines—they would have been practically trapped by the enemy at their base, unable to reach deployment and launch zones. And although by that time launches could even be carried out from the pier, this didn't add to their joy. Meanwhile, the Americans brazenly claimed that the Gulf of Mexico was an inland sea of ​​the United States, while the Russians would make do with 12-mile territorial waters and no inland seas.

And so, on May 21, 1987, our intelligence assets detected the American nuclear-powered guided-missile cruiser Arkansas, armed with Tomahawk missiles... where? ...That's right, in Avacha Bay! It was brazenly pacing around there, demonstrating that it didn't care a damn about all the Foreign Ministry's squeals and other quiet cries from the USSR. And, of course, it was quietly conducting reconnaissance and hydroacoustic imaging of the potential combat zone...


Guided missile cruiser Arkansas

But the USSR back then wasn't just about squeaking about concerns; it could also deliver a punch. And it did.

Our "motorcycle," the Project 1124P patrol cruiser "Bditelny," was scrambled to expel the intruder from territorial waters, and the Project 11351P patrol cruiser "Dzerzhinsky" was also preparing to depart. The fleet also raised alert and dispatched standby forces to the site of the intruder, but the brunt of the confrontation fell on our "Bditelny."

The ships of this project, which served in the 1st Disciplinary Guards, had almost full naval armament, including the Osa air defense missile system, torpedoes and depth charges, RBU-6000 rocket launchers, and, of course, naval artillery. These Defense, anti-submarine warfare systems, and air defense missile systems were not a sham; their use was constantly practiced during exercises within the framework of the air defense naval units and jointly with the fleet.


Loading anti-aircraft missiles onto the Vigilant surface-to-air missile system

The division's ships were based in Salt Lake Bay. Avacha Bay, the largest bay in the world—it could accommodate the entire world fleet, according to reference books. Salt Lake Bay itself was small, and there were many ships in it, even including those in service and undergoing repairs. They were crowded, the mooring bollards on the piers were tightly tied with mooring lines from various ships, and sometimes the rules of good seamanship were violated, causing the mooring lines to become entangled. Undoing the mooring lines took time. While you untangled your own and others' "ropes" from the bollards, especially while being accompanied by a detailed, salty account from the mooring crews about the origins of your parents, your mothers, and all the relatives back to the tenth generation of those mooring crews who had tangled these knots…

That day, the patrol cruiser "Bditelny" was moored at the 1st Brigade, facing the pier. It was a beautiful sunny day, a day off, the crew had relaxed a bit, and the officers were mostly at home. Then the commander was urgently summoned to division headquarters. There, he received orders to summon the officers aboard, was given a combat mission, and was ordered to immediately set sail for Avacha Bay to stop an American ship from violating the USSR's border.


Commander of the "Bditelny" patrol ship, Captain-Lieutenant V.N. Kaloshin, 1985. Unfortunately, no other photographs of this officer could be found...

The commander galloped onto the ship, followed by the rest of the ship's officers, summoned from their homes by the duty officer's alert (a process well-practiced in the division—the officers' quarters were within 10 minutes' reach of the unit). As he ran, across the entire pier, he yelled, "Battle alert!" The ship's alarm bells rang loudly, and the crew, scalded, ran to their battle stations. The mechanics started the "motorcycle," first puffing smoke and howling diesel engines, quickly preparing the turbine. The boatswain reported, "The mooring lines are tangled with someone else's ropes..." A short order came from the control room: "Cut them down!" And the boatswain chopped the mooring lines with an axe.

The ship, unmoored, leaped from the pier like a greyhound and raced toward the exit of the base and Avacha Bay. They requested permission to exit the bay from the duty officer of the waterway security department, who began mumbling, "Wait for permission, the roadstead is closed." (Later it became clear why—a Project 667BRDM nuclear-powered strategic missile submarine was entering the bay from an autonomous position.) The commander of the PSKR "Bditelny," Captain 3rd Rank Vladimir Nikolaevich Kaloshin, shouted across Avacha Bay on Channel 16 of the duty VHF: "Yeah, I..." added something about something with the instrument to the duty officer, and "I'm leaving depending on the situation!" A minute later, the commander stepped on the gas, then increased the speed to medium speed while still in the bay, then to full speed, and when he turned toward the exit of Avacha Bay, 163,5 degrees, he increased the speed to full speed.

This was too much – such recklessness was unacceptable. The speed on the lines was no more than 9 knots, while the "Bditelny" was going full speed... It was terrifying... This ship's maximum speed is 35 knots, and in the narrow channel, it had to pass the Project 667BRDM SSBN, colloquially known as the "humpback," at full speed, behind the massive hump of missile silos behind the conning tower. The "humpback"'s commander, stunned and twirling his finger at his temple, stared at the suicidal border guard and potential nuclear bomber racing like a madman down the fairway...

When such a "motorcycle" is racing at full speed, the sea is cut by the bow like a knife, the cut wave rises high and rolls off the side, and a white surf appears behind. It all looks so beautiful that you forget everything else! And so the "Bditelny" was going—not even walking, but flying—that day, on alert.

One more small digression...

During my entire service, I personally only had to give the "Combat Alert" signal twice. Daily drills were routine, from damage control exercises to preparing the ship for passage through a narrow channel, launching a boat, and other various shipboard activities. The drill was sounded by a bell—a loud ringing bell—and consisted of three short and one long signal, lasting approximately 15-20 seconds. The crew would disperse to their battle stations, usually already dressed—this was necessary to prevent injuries. Within 5-6 minutes, readiness reports would be received from all battle stations, meaning the equipment would be activated and brought to immediate readiness for use, the gun mounts would be prepared to load shells, but no shells were loaded. The main engine would warm up and be ready for full operation.

Combat alert... hmm...

The first time I had to pull the bell lever and hold it for an agonizing 30 seconds, the crew's reaction showed that their understanding of combat and their readiness for it hadn't faded in the routine of everyday service. People were literally thrown out of their bunks and quarters by the "Battle Alert." Sailors rushed to their battle stations, barefoot, in their underwear, with their work clothes and shoes in their hands or under their arms. Doors and hatches rattled as they were locked, and the balusters of the gangways rattled like shotgun pellets. Readiness reports poured in nonstop to the main command post, the engines were brought up to operating mode in two minutes, although the regulations called for 15... Gunners flew like bullets to the AK-230 barbettes, ammunition belts, like a card trick, were loaded into the gun breechblocks, and the pneumatic reloaders dryly clicked the first rounds into the breech. The tension was so intense, it felt like a single touch would explode like an atomic bomb. There was a slight ringing in their ears; in that state, the crew was ready for anything. That's what "Battle Alert" is...


Meanwhile, the American cruiser Arkansas penetrated six miles into our territorial waters and brazenly prowled along the border within them, clearly demonstrating its disregard for international maritime law and the Soviet Navy. The patrol cruiser Bditelny quickly approached this insolent vessel, using lights and flags to signal the violation of our territorial waters and demanding that it leave.

Our ship exposed its broadside to the cruiser the first time, but it turned away and continued on through the USSR's internal waters. The border guard exposed its broadside again—and the story repeated itself. We reported the situation and the lack of response from the intruder to the division command post.

On the cruiser, they pretended they couldn't see or hear anything; no one appeared on the deck or bridge. The enemy continued to brazenly trample our land, or rather, our waters... Then, over the MCC, the Americans brazenly started waving flags that said something like, "Baby, don't move, watch my movements," which basically meant telling us to go to hell...

At the "Bditelny" command post, the public address system was switched on from the radio room at the ZAS post. As participants recall, the division commander's voice came over the speakers: "Volodya, Moscow has given the go-ahead for EVERYTHING. Do whatever you want, but make sure he's not in our waters within 20 minutes.!»...

...The nuclear-powered guided missile cruiser Arkansas, armed with Tomahawk missiles, and a small, nimble border guard with torpedoes, a surface-to-air missile system, two cannons, and a displacement almost 10 times smaller...

So ramming became the only and final option. What followed was something that could only happen in the Soviet and Russian navies.

... Time was ticking... The ship was going at full speed on a parallel course with the intruder, not allowing it to penetrate further into the territorial waters of the USSR.
The commander whispered to the first mate, and both went below to their cabins. A few minutes later, the ship's commander, Captain 3rd Rank Vladimir Kaloshin, and the first mate, both in full dress uniform and wearing medals and decorations, ascended to the bridge.
The first mate announced over the radio in a matter-of-fact and calm voice: “Ship uniform number three, first term.”

The ship's combat alert was announced to the first-term dress uniform, meaning full dress. The crew understood.

It was a simple border guard ship. In peacetime. A simple commander. A simple crew. Simply. Doing. Their. Duty.


On the bridge, the order was given to raise the flags on the MSS: “I order you to leave the territorial waters of the USSR, otherwise you will be subject to weapon"The PSKR pulled away from the cruiser, turned to port, and headed toward the oncoming ships to ram them. The political officer blasted the Soviet National Anthem over the upper deck and throughout the compartments...

A flag was raised on the topmast, meaning "Dying but not surrendering." The distance was rapidly closing, and the PSKR was heading full speed ahead, aiming to ram the American cruiser.

The nerves were stretched taut, even at every nut and rivet, and not just at the crew…

And the American couldn't bear the pressure and turned away into the open sea. They passed each other on their starboard sides, less than two cables' lengths apart.

The commander, political officer, and first mate came out onto the bridge of the patrol ship "Bditelny." The American ship was running around, and Yankees poured onto the bridge. They, the Americans, saluted the coast guard ship.

Our commander didn't salute the disgraced enemy, but gripped the railing until his knuckles whitened. The Yankees headed out to sea and languished there for a few more days. Our "Bditelny" and the fleet's duty forces watched over them for a week, then the PSKR returned home.

Upon returning to base, the crew was greeted by an orchestra, the division commander shook hands with each sailor, and two months later, the ship's commander went to the academy without competition.

Reference: The PSKR "Bditelny" of project 1124 was launched on April 18, 1981 at the Khabarovsk Shipyard, commissioned on September 25, 1981, and decommissioned in 1998. It also took part in the 1983 search operation at the site of the crash of the South Korean Boeing.

The commander of the patrol cruiser "Bditelny" was Captain 3rd Rank Vladimir Nikolaevich Kaloshin (died in 2021); senior assistant Captain-Lieutenant Bozhinsky; deputy commander for political affairs Captain 3rd Rank Golovanov; commander of BC-5 Ivandyukov; commander of BC-3 Savelyev, who read the MSS signs; signalman Yura from Krivoy Rog was the first to spot the "Arkansas"; and boatswain Kovalenko. I apologize for any errors in the names and ranks, as some sources are contradictory, and some of the participants are no longer alive.

P.S. An hour later, the Project 1135 frigate pulled up, smoking like a samovar. The American, according to acoustics, was quietly slapping along under the reactor, only the propellers were faintly audible, while our Project 1135 roared loudly across the entire ocean. After a while, our naval aviation and amused herself by practicing approaches and attacks. As it later became clear, the aircraft were covering the departure or return of our submarine, creating interference for the enemy.

The Arkansas repeatedly violated the border in Avacha Bay and elsewhere, but subsequently, it reluctantly complied with the demands of the border ships, and the Yankees no longer had any desire to test us off the coast of Kamchatka...

This case was described in the American press, but without details.

I will add that on May 21, 1987, the ships of the 1st Disciplinary Penetration Test Fleet "Dzerzhinsky", the Penetration Test Fleet "Bditelny", the Penetration Test Fleet "Reshitelny", as well as ships of the Kamchatka Flotilla of the USSR Navy, in particular, MPK-143 and MPK-145, took part in this operation, that is, this was practically the benefit performance of Project 1124 in all its versions.

Well, we've had our time... The beer is gone, and so is the roach... Until next time...
208 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 34+
    12 November 2025 04: 18
    I read it in one breath!!! good
    Thank you so much for the memories!
    1. 23+
      12 November 2025 04: 28
      I fully support this. Great article, everyone should read it!!! good I am proud of the history of our Navy!
      To all the Navy, good luck, brothers!
      1. 23+
        12 November 2025 09: 46
        Thank you!
        Our fleet, our destiny, our life hi
    2. 24+
      12 November 2025 09: 45
      Thanks for the compliment!
      The article was also written in one breath, only to be edited 26 more times later, creating a headache for the moderators. drinks
      1. +9
        12 November 2025 11: 52
        Thanks for the article, it was literally written in one breath. Great job, guys! The taranka and beer were fantastic.
        1. 12+
          12 November 2025 12: 14
          Thank you!
          Taranka and... without beer? How could it be? Two inseparable friends. drinks
          1. +1
            19 November 2025 12: 30
            Quote: Vasily_Ostrovsky
            Taranka and... without beer? How could it be? Two inseparable friends.

            "Young man, how can you eat herring without vodka!"
            1. +1
              19 November 2025 12: 38
              Quote: carpenter
              "Young man, how can you eat herring without vodka!


              Well, that's what I'm talking about... the other day I tried to break a centuries-old ban - no pleasure...

              By the way, I recommend not Atlantic herring, but Olyutorskaya herring; I finally saw it recently in a small shop in St. Petersburg... wassat
              1. +1
                19 November 2025 12: 44
                Quote: Vasily_Ostrovsky
                By the way, I recommend not Atlantic herring, but Olyutor herring.

                White Sea and Sosenskaya herring are no worse, but they are currently not available for sale.
                1. 0
                  19 November 2025 12: 51
                  Quote: carpenter
                  White Sea and Sosensk herring are no worse

                  There was a fish factory in Olyutorsky Bay that made herring for the very big, fat guys in the Central Committee and the Political Bureau of the CPSU... The herring was caught in the bay... it was plump, very tender, a perfect size... and they salted it using a special technique, in a spicy-sweet-salty solution, and even with some local spices (and this is practically Chukotka...)... and put it in a jar - a big one, 3-4 kg...

                  Anyway, I was just typing this and I was almost drooling, from memory...
                  In short, a can of this herring, with a loaf of ship's bread per person, and a can of awl for four people - in one go, and no drunkenness... drinks soldier
                  1. 0
                    19 November 2025 13: 27
                    Quote: Vasily_Ostrovsky
                    and also with some local spices (and this is almost Chukotka...)... and in a jar - a large one, 3-4 kg.

                    Only local spices are used for herring: various Indian and Thai ones are good for sprat, but not for herring.
                    1. +1
                      19 November 2025 13: 31
                      They could add juniper, or lingonberry leaves... a little, so as not to spoil the taste....
                      This is how you eat this herring: you hold it by the tail and head, kiss its back and... yeah, you suck out the whole thing in one go... it's incredibly soft, almost like yogurt today...

                      This is terrible, I'm going to have lunch, I can't do this...
                      1. +1
                        19 November 2025 13: 35
                        Quote: Vasily_Ostrovsky
                        This is terrible, I'm going to have lunch, I can't do this.

                        This evening after work I'll go to Prizma. They have good Norwegian and North Sea herring, sold in bulk; it's at its fattest in the fall. I haven't seen Friesian herring for 20 years.
                      2. +1
                        19 November 2025 14: 29
                        Take care of yourself!
                        Herring is like this...
                        drinks
                      3. +1
                        19 November 2025 14: 34
                        Quote: Vasily_Ostrovsky
                        Herring is like this...

                        Occasionally and in small amounts is possible.
                        We had a fall fishing season for herring and sprat since the end of October. Fall sprat is very fatty, weighing three kilos. We'd caught them all within a month.
                      4. +1
                        19 November 2025 14: 50
                        Quote: carpenter
                        We had an autumn fishing season for herring and sprat from the end of October.

                        Well, they would have sent half a barrel. wassat
                      5. +1
                        19 November 2025 15: 45
                        Quote: Vasily_Ostrovsky
                        Well, they would have sent half a barrel.

                        It is impossible to transport it across the border to Ivangorod.
                      6. +1
                        19 November 2025 18: 00
                        Well, I can't help you there... only in a tank - and I'm not a tanker at all...
                        drinks
  2. 27+
    12 November 2025 04: 42
    From my experience. No one else can spin tales with such inspiration as sailors. And they don't lie, they just "embellish a little"...
    1. 36+
      12 November 2025 06: 27
      We can do that! Well, here it is, good old "VO", it's nice to come and read! Thank you so much!
      1. 25+
        12 November 2025 09: 51
        Quote: Aleksey7777777
        We can do this!

        "We can't, but we can!" (Only old men go into battle)
        Thank you for the complimentary review. feel
        1. +7
          13 November 2025 16: 20
          "We can't, but we can!" (Only old men go into battle)

          Handsome border guards. The potential suicide bombers, by the way, were Americans, who took much less of a risk; they might not have turned them away...

          Here's a question: could the border guards have possibly called for backup in such cases? Why not call in the air force, for example? It seems a bit odd, frankly, to be fighting such a crocodile alone. what
          1. +7
            13 November 2025 23: 10
            Quote: Arzt
            Here's a question: could the border guards have called for backup in such cases? Why not call in the air force, for example?


            The article mentions this: both aircraft and Caspian Fleet ships participated, so the Vigilant wasn't fighting there alone... soldier
    2. Des
      +7
      12 November 2025 07: 29
      Quote: Puncher
      They don't lie, they just "embellish it a little"...

      Normal people don't lie)
      1. +7
        12 November 2025 07: 31
        Quote: Des
        Normal people don't lie)

        Absolutely not! Especially over a glass of strong tea...
        1. Des
          +7
          12 November 2025 07: 36
          Even without tea. In keeping with my age and life experience... Whatever. And yes, it makes me feel better and overall, I'm free.
          1. 17+
            12 November 2025 09: 53
            Quote: Des
            In accordance with age and past life experience... I don't care.

            That's right... it's no longer interesting to lie - life has accumulated so many realities that can never exist under any circumstances, that even fibbing is - well, why bother? winked
    3. 17+
      12 November 2025 09: 49
      Quote: Puncher
      No one else can tell stories as inspiredly as sailors.


      This is yes ...
      And lying is a sin! Therefore, everything is true, and often even "unpolished" drinks
  3. 16+
    12 November 2025 05: 27
    Offset to the author good
    but there is a small problem
    A nuclear-powered strategic missile submarine of Project 667BRDM entered the bay from an autonomous position.
    - etc. 667 BDRMBRDM is a slightly different unit. wink
    1. 17+
      12 November 2025 09: 58
      Quote: faiver
      Project 667 BDRM, BRDM is a slightly different unit

      Yes, it's an annoying typo, BDRM would be correct... I confess, my fingers on the keyboard sometimes overtake the rest of my thoughts... hi
      1. +8
        12 November 2025 11: 14
        Project 667BDRM cruisers served exclusively in the Northern Fleet and never conducted inter-fleet voyages. Project 667BDR was based in Kamchatka, while Project 667A and 667B were based in Primorye.
        1. +6
          12 November 2025 11: 32
          "Never say never", the history of Russia and the USSR is an unpredictable thing, there was a lot that wasn't and vice versa... bully hi
          1. +5
            12 November 2025 11: 57
            I served for a couple of decades in the 13th, then the 31st submarine squadron, which included Project 667BDRM ships. I know the histories of all the ships more or less. There was no such thing as "naibrot." What a vile word. If you don't believe me, look it up on this website: https://deepstorm.ru/
          2. 12+
            12 November 2025 11: 57
            Yes, that's how it was - something that never happened...

            I tried to check the fact on BDRM, called my classmates.... belay
            So what? One said verbatim, "That's bullshit, they didn't go there" (he served in the North himself), two said, "Well, it happened, I don't remember the years..." Another even said that such boats were part of the flotilla... well, what can you do? And a couple of them were admirals... so use the original sources, heh-heh... bully
        2. 10+
          12 November 2025 11: 45
          Maybe you missed it—there was a lot of fuss in the late 80s about checking and preparing the fairway for these BDRMs. They even prepared navigation support and support ships for the 667BDRM and Project 941... The Mars system was even deployed in mobile positions back then, if it came down to that... I myself don't understand why the hell Mars is needed for naval navigation. Well, maneuvering in the bay is fine, but in the fairway... but the "navigation" service has its own problems. bully
          I don't remember the entry of project 941, I won't lie (well, not much wassat ), but memories of the 667 BDRM remain...
          I may be mistaken, but experience shows that, as a rule, nuances are forgotten, but anything can happen...
          The participants in the events are all surface ships, and not just border guards. For them, everything is "hunchbacked," whether it's a BDR or a BDRM... I don't think that's critical. drinks
          1. +4
            12 November 2025 12: 00
            I repeat, the BDRMs, comprising seven hulls (K-51, K-84, K-64, K-114, K-117, K-18, and K-407), have never served in the Pacific Fleet. Their entire service was and is being conducted in the Northern Fleet. Inter-fleet transits were carried out by ships of the 667th BDR. The last one was the K-44 "Ryazan." The senior officer on board was the current Commander-in-Chief, A.A. Moiseyev.
            1. +7
              12 November 2025 12: 25
              Well, okay, arguing with a submariner about submarines is a dull business... wassat
              I'll clarify in the printed version, maybe even by orders of the Navy, come what may... the very fact of the entry of a Project 667 submarine from the BDR or "thicker" at the same time as the exit of the "Bditelny" is a medical fact. soldier
        3. ANB
          0
          13 November 2025 14: 26
          The 667th BDR was based in Kamchatka.

          There were A and B too. In the early 90s for sure. They were copied in front of me. There was definitely no BDRM.
    2. 17+
      12 November 2025 10: 04
      Faiver (Andrey), sir, the author's minor error is forgivable; it seems he had and has no connection to the submarine. Perhaps Pacific Fleet historians will correct me, BUT! Project 667BDRM submarines were not based in Kamchatka and did not enter Avacha Bay. Most likely, the BDR was returning. Several Project 667BDR submarines passed from the Northern Fleet to the Pacific Fleet under the ice of the Arctic Ocean in the 1980s. Apparently, their dear "partners" decided to touch, smell, and taste something following the order from SEVMASH in May 1987. After all, the whole country had already heard about acceleration and glasnost by then, though it hadn't lived to see the new thinking yet...
      The article is written wonderfully.
      I was a good Octobrist, a wonderful Pioneer, and a brilliant Komsomol member. That's probably why I liked the author's highlighted thoughts in the article:
      "But the USSR back then wasn't just squeaking about concerns; it could also hit. And it did."; "Volodya, Moscow has given the go-ahead for EVERYTHING. Do whatever you want, but make sure it's out of our waters within 20 minutes!" ..."; "It was a simple border guard ship. In peacetime. A simple commander. A simple crew. Simply. Doing. Their. Duty."...
      Thanks again to the author for his work!
      He may not be a cat, but he is a kind word...
      1. +7
        12 November 2025 10: 13
        Quote: Tests
        BUT! The Project 667 BDRM submarines were not based in Kamchatka.

        True, but it's easy to confuse, the BDR were also hunchbacked.
        1. +8
          12 November 2025 10: 42
          Quote: Puncher
          True, but it's easy to confuse, the BDR were also hunchbacked

          The BDRM was visually different in size from the BDR... It was a pure joy to see such a "shed"! A real "cucaracha"... hats off to you... belay
          1. 10+
            12 November 2025 11: 18
            In fact, the BDR can only be visually distinguished from the BDRM up close. Their silhouettes are similar.
            The photo shows a BDR. The characteristic scupper grates on the sides.
            1. 10+
              12 November 2025 11: 20
              Here's the BDRM. From the same angle.
              1. +9
                12 November 2025 11: 34
                Visually, the BDRM is larger, which is clearly visible when it moves along the fairway. wink
                And the dimensions of the ship confirm this, it is almost 12 meters longer, it is noticeable, the silhouette is stretched and the "barn" seems even larger drinks

                Kamchatka, as you yourself know, was chock-full of experts - probably 60 percent of the population were connected with the navy, and the fact that every resident considered himself a "great specialist" is a given, there's no getting away from it. wassat

                For example, how can you tell which ship is entering Avacha? So, there goes serial number 1124... but no, someone will definitely see their own signs, and the whole bay will be buzzing: "Reshitelny" is coming, not "Bditelny" or "Smely", but specifically "Reshitelny". soldier
                1. +4
                  12 November 2025 12: 02
                  The dimensions of the BDRM and BDR are comparable. They can only be visually distinguished at a fairly close distance.
                  1. +8
                    12 November 2025 12: 11
                    This is where I'll dig in my heels, sorry. laughing
                    12 meters in length is almost 10% of the total length of the boat, the silhouette is stretched out, and this is visually noticeable.
                    For you, who served on a boat, these nuances may be familiar, and you may not pay attention to them.

                    Actually, this is normal perception. To you, all surface ships look roughly the same, and you'll only be able to tell a border guard from a naval one by looking at them closely. That's true, nothing special about it; it's just how humans and their perceptions work. wink

                    For a surface ship pilot, a nuclear submarine is a great monster, and all attention is focused on it.
                    For a border guard, recognizing a silhouette is part of their professional work. The signalmen kept very detailed albums, and not just official ones – many ships had their own “reserves” of photographs and silhouettes.
                    Somehow soldier
                    1. +3
                      12 November 2025 12: 14
                      When part of a submarine's hull is submerged due to flooding of the bow and stern, you won't notice these meters at a distance of half a mile. And the silhouettes, I repeat, are very similar.
                2. +2
                  13 November 2025 10: 39
                  Quote: Vasily_Ostrovsky
                  For example, how can you tell which ship is entering Avacha? So, there goes serial number 1124... but no, someone will definitely see their own signs, and the whole bay will be buzzing: "Reshitelny" is coming, not "Bditelny" or "Smely", but specifically "Reshitelny". soldier

                  There was a story on Bigler about an inspector from Moscow who drew up carbon-copy inspection reports for ships—it was all the same design, after all. Everything was fine until he got to the MPC, where, if I remember correctly, the design RBU had long since been dismantled... laughing
                  1. +1
                    13 November 2025 13: 47
                    You're spot on... I've been to the factory acceptance process myself more than once... all that's left are interjections and a complete lack of Dahl's dictionary... the things that went on there - in both directions - are beyond words... wassat

                    I'll keep quiet for now, maybe I'll overcome myself and describe it in some story... but that's fraught with danger... yeah... bully
      2. +8
        12 November 2025 10: 39
        Quote: Tests
        He may not be a cat, but he is a kind word...

        And how!...

        The BDRM really didn't have a permanent base at the Pacific Fleet; the flotilla was equipped with A, B, BD, and BDR. When the BDRM came to reinforce the fleet, the whole of Petropavlovsk came running to see this miracle enter Avacha... smile
        and indeed, I only had an indirect connection with the submarine fleet - I began my studies in the underwater class and did practical training on a submarine, that was all I learned... there were plenty of stories there, it was a fun time lol
        1. +2
          12 November 2025 11: 54
          Dear author! The "B-Daehi" are also Northern Fleet ships. I haven't heard of them entering Avacha Bay... Although... they were able to hit China with a K-92 missile...
          1. +7
            12 November 2025 12: 21
            In practice, some part of our class was on BD...
            For example, I generally believed that "Azukha" could not have appeared in Kamchatka due to its dilapidation... but there it was in all its glory... bully
            So I scored a goal for myself while preparing the article... request
            1. +4
              12 November 2025 12: 30
              Thirty-four Project 667A ships were built, 10 of which were built in Komsomolsk-on-Amur.
              1. +6
                12 November 2025 12: 35
                Even in school they were considered a "fading type", and by the mid-80s they were no longer remembered, but they were still puffing away, in spite of the enemy drinks
        2. +4
          12 November 2025 12: 28
          By the way, the BDs, built in the amount of 4 units, served exclusively in the Northern Fleet as part of the 3rd submarine flotilla, Gadzhievo.
          1. +5
            12 November 2025 12: 33
            Almost a third of my class served on them...
            I haven't had the chance, I've been to other projects smile
            and I liked the 641 the most... a real submarine, yeah... bully hi
            1. +4
              12 November 2025 12: 44
              Yes, it's a complete nightmare. I once spent two weeks at sea on a Project 636 submarine for work. It was total darkness.
              1. +4
                12 November 2025 12: 52
                Quote: 955535
                Yes, it's a complete nightmare. I once spent two weeks at sea on a Project 636 submarine for work. It was total darkness.


                Some time back in the 2000s, my friends decided to scare me – they invited me to the 636th… they brought me, I looked at the central station, but that didn't happen – naval hospitality intervened… yeah… when I told them how a classmate had treated me on a submarine, they were offended at first, and then asked – on which submarine? I told them – yes, on the 641st, in Magadan… they were so excited, they immediately poured more drinks. drinks
      3. +9
        12 November 2025 10: 39
        I was a good Octobrist, a wonderful Pioneer, and a brilliant Komsomol member. That's probably why I liked the author's highlighted thoughts in the article:

        My Komsomol youth didn't work out for me—the organization was killed just as I was preparing to join. All summer long, I tormented myself with a multi-volume edition of Lenin's works, collections of Max and Engels's works, newspaper clippings from Party Congresses...
        And on September 1st, when I came to school, I learned that my efforts were in vain; I should have read Tolstoy’s War and Peace...
        1. +4
          12 November 2025 12: 40
          Quote: Kote pane Kohanka
          All summer long I was tormented by a multi-volume edition of Lenin's works, collections of Max and Engels' works, and newspaper clippings from Party Congresses.

          hi In 1974 they didn't demand this... request
          1. +6
            12 November 2025 14: 49
            Of course, they didn't demand it, but as a teenager, I took this issue very seriously. Besides, I got my fill of the laurels of the guy who won first place in the region for writing the essay "My Homeland, the Soviet Union." At the time, he was a nuclear physicist, PhD candidate, and so on.
            Dogs. I was recently going through my children's books, at least 10 of which are about V.I. Lenin.
            I don't know whether this is good or bad. Essentially, there's nothing harmful in the content. I've seen similar ones today, only once – about Korolev.
            1. +1
              12 November 2025 15: 14
              Quote: Kote pane Kohanka
              I was recently going through my children's books, at least 10 of them were about V.I. Lenin.
              I don't know if this is good or bad. Essentially, there's nothing harmful about the content.

              There is still Marietta Shaginyan Leniniana....
      4. +6
        12 November 2025 11: 25
        Dear Sir, the author's small mistake is forgivable.
        - I have no complaints, it’s written heartfeltly, it’s a pleasure to read... hi
      5. +2
        12 November 2025 14: 16
        I was a good Octobrist, a wonderful Pioneer, and a brilliant Komsomol member. That's probably why I liked the author's highlighted thoughts in the article:
        "But the USSR back then wasn't just squeaking about concerns; it could also hit. And it did."; "Volodya, Moscow has given the go-ahead for EVERYTHING. Do whatever you want, but make sure it's out of our waters within 20 minutes!" ..."; "It was a simple border guard ship. In peacetime. A simple commander. A simple crew. Simply. Doing. Their. Duty."...
        Thanks again to the author for his work!
        He may not be a cat, but he is a kind word...

        (c) "Red lines, you say?.. Heh"
  4. 12+
    12 November 2025 05: 45
    Author - thanks for the article!
    I'm waiting for new publications.
    1. +5
      12 November 2025 14: 41
      Thank you!
      I hope it will be soon winked
  5. 13+
    12 November 2025 06: 42
    It has nothing to do with the sea, so I read it with great interest!
    Well, that's what naval service is like... What kind of nerves must have been in the sailors going into a ramming attack, to certain death!
    Thanks to the author! Keep writing! good
    1. +7
      12 November 2025 10: 01
      Quote: your vsr 66-67
      I read it with great interest!

      Thanks, tried winked

      Quote: your vsr 66-67
      What kind of nerves must have been in the sailors going into a ramming attack, to certain death!

      A sense of duty and rightness... soldier
  6. Des
    11+
    12 November 2025 07: 28
    Thank you.
    This is a normal, genuine author's article on VO.
    1. +7
      12 November 2025 10: 02
      Thank you wink
      I learn from VO articles myself. drinks
  7. +2
    12 November 2025 08: 38
    PSKR "Bditelny" project 1124

    Let me be a bore...
    The Project 1124 Albatross small anti-submarine warfare ships (NATO designation: Grisha-class corvettes) are a series of Soviet small anti-submarine warfare ships (MPCs) of the 3rd rank, built in the 1970s and 1980s for the Soviet Navy in two main series (Projects 1124 and 1124M, then 1124MU). Second-rank border patrol ship versions (Projects P1124 and 1124P) were also built.
    hi
    1. +8
      12 November 2025 10: 05
      Quote: Gomunkul
      Let me be a bore...

      Come on! Burn it!
      The navy had its own ranking.
      In the KGB's MChPV, the ship's rank was one step higher. The Project 124 MPC is, indeed, only a 3rd-rank ship. For the border guards, it's a 2nd-rank patrol ship. And the positions on the ship are also one step higher. wink

      And one more thing: many articles on forums, even those specialized in ship projects, should be used with some caution. The armament, the years, and the dimensions can be distorted, sometimes unintentionally—people have pieced it all together from various sources. Then it even ends up in print publications.
      You read it - well, it's complete nonsense... But it's signed by some admiral or someone else who wasn't even close to these ships... This happens often, and I come across such blunders very often...
      1. +6
        12 November 2025 11: 27
        Quote: Vasily_Ostrovsky
        In the KGB's MChPV, the ship's rank was one step higher. The Project 124 MPC is, indeed, only a 3rd-rank ship. For the border guards, it's a 2nd-rank patrol ship. And the positions on the ship are also one step higher.

        Even the Project 205P with a displacement of 245 tons were listed as MChPV ships - PSKR. While their basis - Project 205 - was a boat in the Navy. smile
        1. +5
          12 November 2025 11: 37
          Quote: Alexey RA
          In the MChPV, even the Project 205P, with a displacement of 245 tons, were considered ships—PSKRs. Meanwhile, their basis—Project 205—was considered a boat by the Navy.


          Exactly! And not just any PSKR, but a rank 3 PSKR!
          But in reality, even without missile launchers, it's just a boat, just a bicycle... And these "bicycles" served not only in the Baltic and Black Seas, but also in the Shikotan Brigade of the PSKR and in Nakhodka. And they gave the enemy a run for their money thanks to their speed and maneuverability. drinks soldier
          1. +4
            12 November 2025 15: 58
            Quote: Vasily_Ostrovsky
            Exactly! And not just any PSKR, but a rank 3 PSKR!

            Yeah... given that the Navy's "third rank" were the thousand-ton cruise missile cruisers - Projects 50, 159, 35.
            Aunt Vika is slandering that there is also a 4th rank PSKR - with a displacement of less than 100 tons. smile
            1. +4
              12 November 2025 17: 04
              Quote: Alexey RA
              Aunt Vika is slandering that there is also a 4th rank PSKR - with a displacement of less than 100 tons.


              This woman is writing about today's ships, the 131-ton Project 03050. There were "little ones" in Soviet times, too, but in a different theater of operations...

              I might be able to summarize it in a review article, but it wouldn't be interesting—if I haven't seen it myself, I haven't touched it, so it'll come out dry and bureaucratic, alas... drinks
  8. +5
    12 November 2025 09: 10
    One time, our bells on the Kirov got stuck. They wanted to say something in the wheelhouse—either one (messenger upstairs), or three (listen up, everyone!)—but it turned out to be one long ring. Battle alert!!! Do you think anyone even moved from the forecastle? Right now... The only reaction was, "Orderly, shut up the fountain!!!" The technical solution was to put a newspaper between the hammer and the bell.
    1. +7
      12 November 2025 10: 17
      The Kirov has been used in so many ways it's hard to believe. It's been described as an artillery cruiser, a nuclear-powered missile cruiser, a minesweeper, a border guard... The ship could be in repairs, in dry dock, in mothballs, under construction, or otherwise in no condition for battleship status...
      The lower the combat readiness level, the more careless the crew's attitude toward duty. I don't think the crew of even the most disorganized ship would sleep through an alarm, even if they were "under orders." And if it comes to that, then such a ship needs to be sunk; it's already a danger to the country...
      1. +3
        12 November 2025 10: 23
        The Kirov cruiser, 1991-1992, Severomorsk. We seem to have even managed to complete the first course assignment, but that's not a given. "There's no way forward and there won't be," said Captain 2nd Ranger Fedorenko. Ideally, the decision should have been made back in 1991-1992, after the drydock (or, even better, before the drydock repairs). Either a full overhaul or decommissioning.
        1. +7
          12 November 2025 10: 30
          I had the chance to visit the Kirov cruiser, very briefly, for a taster during the Soviet period... I was astounded by its power and size, and felt a sense of pride in the fact that "We can!" and that we'd wiped the floor with the Americans... hi
  9. +6
    12 November 2025 10: 27
    Quote: Tests
    what the author highlighted:
    "But the USSR back then could do more than just squeak about concerns; it could also hit. And it did."; "Volodya, Moscow has given the go-ahead for EVERYTHING. Do whatever you want, but make sure he's out of our waters within 20 minutes!"

    He singled them out deliberately. At that time, even while whining about glasnost, the leaders couldn't bring themselves to abandon the country's defense. Things were called by their proper names... Later, they began brainwashing, which initially caused confusion among officers and sailors, and then rejection - and as a result, starting in 1991, there was a mass dismissal of officers who didn't want to serve "whatever you want"...

    In the original, as in real life, the division commander's words contained a direct reference to the origin and gender of the American ship, but this is no longer overlooked. Perhaps it's right, in case children are reading it? (And children already know even more...)... wassat
    1. +6
      12 November 2025 11: 16
      What if children start reading?
      In the "Site Rules" section (which no one usually reads) there is an "18+" icon.
      Thank you, Vasily! It was interesting!
      1. +5
        12 November 2025 12: 02
        Quote: 3x3zsave
        In the "Site Rules" section (which no one usually reads) there is an "18+" icon.

        Anton, have you looked at today's children lately? They'll tell us more. drinks

        Well, everything is the same - they cut it out, let it remain that way... In the printed version everything will be as written winked
        1. +4
          12 November 2025 12: 41
          Anton, have you looked at modern children lately?
          It's been a while, the youngest will be 21 in December.
          1. +3
            12 November 2025 12: 47
            Yes... my youngest will be turning almost 40 in December... drinks
  10. +4
    12 November 2025 10: 57
    To squander a potential enemy's nuclear-powered missile cruiser before it even entered territorial waters, and even more so while the strategic ship was entering or leaving the bay, that is, at the most vulnerable moment. And this was in the USSR. And now there's nothing to squander. No detection equipment, no patrols, no force.
    1. +7
      12 November 2025 11: 08
      You are right, people have always managed to flap their ears everywhere and in all countries...
      Some of these "blunders" will be mentioned in the following articles, but only as a background to the story...
    2. +7
      12 November 2025 11: 33
      Quote: Ivan_1234
      To blow a potential enemy's nuclear-powered missile cruiser before it even entered territorial waters, and even more so while the strategic ship was entering or leaving the harbor, at its most vulnerable moment. And this in the USSR.

      Perestroika - Glasnost - Acceleration, to hell with them all... sad
      I suspect they spotted the American earlier. And then they tried and debated what to do with him. And they went on and on until he started cruising around Avacha Bay.
      In the Black Sea in 1986, the cruiser Yorktown and destroyer Caron similarly entered our territorial waters to within six miles. That time, no one touched them at all.
    3. +3
      12 November 2025 11: 42
      In the early 80s, they wasted an entire AUG that was heading to the Kuril Islands.
      1. +5
        12 November 2025 12: 56
        Yes, unfortunately, there could have been a Soviet version of Pearl Harbor... there were such miscalculations... there were many things - both great achievements and great mistakes...
        1. +2
          12 November 2025 19: 25
          Great article !!!

          Recently, one of the ... TV channels aired a story about a provocation by an American strike group in the Kuril Islands region.
          The story stated that the Yankee "sea pinnipeds" killed the crew of an observation post or "radio direction-finding" station on one of the islands!
          Is this true?
          Or a hoax from the perestroika era?
          1. +3
            12 November 2025 19: 54
            Quote: hohol95
            The story stated that the Yankee "sea pinnipeds" killed the crew of an observation post or "radio direction-finding" station on one of the islands!


            So, are we talking about a declaration of war? I don't get it, maybe someone stopped snacking... I haven't heard of it... in this form, that's something new...
            1. +1
              12 November 2025 21: 01
              Have you heard about the fires in the radio direction-finding barracks on Iturup Island and in Provideniya Bay, every 10 hours?
              1. +2
                13 November 2025 09: 56
                I heard about Iturup, but I don’t know what really happened there, I haven’t read the documents.

                I won't announce it on RTR in Chukotka yet, maybe later... it's not all clear there either...
                1. +1
                  13 November 2025 17: 31
                  So it turns out that there were fires, but the causes are "unclear"...
                  Were any personnel injured?
                  Is there 100% data on this?
                  Or - "not everything is clear there either"???
                  1. +2
                    13 November 2025 23: 18
                    There is, for example, such a thing - if it is necessary, we will say, but for now there is no need... wassat
                    Not everything can and should be said; reasonable hygiene must be observed...
                    We already wag our tongues too much on all these forums, but one day we'll pay for it - and God willing, it'll only be in money...

                    I had a friend with a phenomenal photographic memory... and after he once, in the wrong place and at the wrong time, reproduced from memory a page of a cipher notebook...

                    In short, you've never been where he ended up... and that's good...
                    1. +1
                      14 November 2025 14: 33
                      I'm a lucky guy in general.
                      The memory is disgusting.
                      I haven't encountered any state secrets.
                      I live and enjoy myself!
  11. +2
    12 November 2025 11: 28
    A huge thank you to the author for his work. It seems like all this was happening right before our eyes, but you learn so much about your country, which "could do nothing but make galoshes." More articles like this, and maybe VO would become the kind VO it once was.
    1. +5
      12 November 2025 13: 03
      I won't be original, but I was also shocked by the leaders' rhetoric on the topic of "galoshes"...
      Unlike the "new achievements that have no analogues in the world" - the ocean fleet and a strong army, with all the mess that came with them - existed, and they were reckoned with and feared...
      And we weren't worried about whether to shoot or not. My country—I'm ready to lay down my life for it. That was the be-all and end-all of choosing a military profession. And not under contract, to receive benefits... although it was nice to receive them, I won't deny that... hi
      1. 0
        12 November 2025 16: 01
        Vasily_Ostrovsky, I apologize for getting off-topic, but I'd really like to hear the opinion of someone involved, so to speak. What's your opinion on the Project 133 Antares RA border patrol boats? Why, after their relatively successful service in the Black Sea and Caspian Sea, were they not continued, given that there is a modern design for a modernized hydrofoil boat, the Project 133RA Antares RA?
        1. +3
          12 November 2025 17: 09
          You know, it was a phenomenal boat - it could reach 60 knots without any nerves!...
          It wasn't used in heavy theaters of operations, you understand - there weren't any conditions...
          But it was, after all, a boat, not a ship.

          It's not just Antares that has passed away... listing them would only bring tears... our leaders are not of the same caliber, it's like Vysotsky: "There are few truly violent ones/..." am soldier
          1. 0
            13 November 2025 08: 37
            Vasily_Ostrovsky, thank you very much again.
    2. +4
      12 November 2025 16: 16
      Quote: bug120560
      It seems like all this was happening right before our eyes, but how much new you learn about your country, which “could do nothing but galoshes.”

      And when did Putin say this? wink
      Let me remind you what was said after the galoshes:
      We had a defense industry - cool, strong, and we are still proud of it. We are grateful to our grandfathers and our fathers for creating such a defense after the Great Patriotic War.
      From the audience: ... And the first satellite.
      Vladimir Putin: Both the first satellite and the first man in space are our common pride, these are the achievements of the Soviet government, of which we are all proud. These are nationwide achievements.

      And the notorious galoshes were consumer goods. They either didn't exist at all, or were of such poor quality that they were simply wow. Take those VAZ cars, which couldn't be released from auto dealerships without undergoing a second inspection according to the quality control list, tightening the nuts, adjusting the locks, and so on (the factory slyly called this "pre-sale preparation" and revoked the warranty on cars purchased without it). Moreover, this was openly reported in the Soviet press as early as the second half of the 70s—how a Soviet citizen, having stood in line for years and bought a car for many thousands, would receive a semi-finished product.
      1. 0
        13 November 2025 09: 02
        Dear Alexey RA, firstly, I didn't attribute the phrase "galoshes" to VVP specifically. Secondly, what you wrote about are the achievements of a great country, with a completely different system. Whether it was good or bad is a separate topic, but it was truly great. As for consumer goods, my first car was a VAZ 2101, manufactured in 1975. It was excellent in every respect, and believe me, in terms of quality, it's a far cry from today's "buckets" with nuts and bolts. I could also recall a ton of electronics that were not only equal to, but sometimes even superior to, Japanese ones, but I'm afraid that won't mean anything to you, who only know the USSR from media reports.
        1. 0
          13 November 2025 09: 19
          Quote: bug120560
          But I'm afraid that for you, who only know the USSR from media articles, this won't mean anything.

          Četárzhu. I'll be watching with interest how this, ahem, banquet continues.
        2. 0
          13 November 2025 10: 27
          Quote: bug120560
          As for consumer goods, my first car was a VAZ 2101, manufactured in 1975. It was a wonderful car in every respect, and believe me, in terms of quality it was very far from modern "buckets" with nuts and bolts.

          I can hardly imagine regularly replacing the valve stem seals and adjusting the valve clearances on my current Chinese car. And not just a simple "drive the car to the station and pay for the work" type of replacement, but one that involves first finding the right seals (my father once brought them all the way from Khosta) and then doing the work myself in the garage.
          VAZ-21063, manufactured in 1986.
          Quote: bug120560
          But I'm afraid that for you, who only know the USSR from media articles, this won't mean anything.

          Well, yes, well... how could a person who personally observed in 1983 the sale of meat only upon presentation of a residence permit know about life in the USSR?
          1. 0
            13 November 2025 14: 09
            Alexey RA, don't you think you're drawing conclusions based on facts from completely different areas of life in the USSR? I've said it before and I'll repeat it: the USSR produced practically everything, primarily from domestic components, and the quality of what was produced wasn't just equal to, but in some cases even surpassed, foreign products. The fact that not everything was available back then is a completely different story. Today, we produce practically nothing, except military equipment and raw materials. This is a very high-quality technological development.
            1. +3
              13 November 2025 14: 32
              With your permission, I will join your discussion... feel

              When it comes to the USSR, we always compare the incomparable... no other country of "developed capitalism" suffered such destruction as the USSR during the Great Patriotic War, that's a fact. And we shouldn't be ashamed that VCRs were bulky, washing machines were more robust, that shoes weren't made very well, or that...
              If only some more time had passed, class B industries would have caught up...
              Were the Japanese videos good? Who could argue with that? The Romanian women's boots are beautiful! And so on...

              Was there much "wrong"? Of course! Our desires back then far outstripped our means, that's a fact... And my father lived through the famine, and my father-in-law was found dying of hunger by neighbors after eating unripe taiga grapes out of hunger...
              My mother-in-law only started wearing shoes when she was about 17... Her mother was ashamed to take cracklings from the pots, in case there weren't enough for the wounded...

              All this was... this is where it all started...
              Did anyone in Europe get this bad? I won't even mention America; there are no idiots there...
              Of course, our generation already wanted everything at once, and the leadership here failed to turn the propaganda on this topic in the right direction... Dogmatism, again...
              But the complaint against the current leaders is a hundred times more justified.
              1. +1
                13 November 2025 14: 34
                Vasily_Ostrovsky and you are 100% right again!
                1. +3
                  13 November 2025 14: 40
                  What about me?
                  Life is always right... it teaches us and teaches us, but we still don't...
                  "In the sweat of your brow you will eat your bread" - seems to be from the Bible...
                  But everything at once - that doesn't happen... Let me remind you that these were the slogans of the political scoundrel and alcoholic Yeltsin - "Take everything!"

                  So we took it... now we're paying...
              2. +3
                13 November 2025 16: 17
                Quote: Vasily_Ostrovsky
                When it comes to the USSR, we always compare the incomparable... not a single country of "developed capitalism" was subjected to such destruction as the USSR during the Great Patriotic War, that's a fact.

                Except perhaps Britain - with its rationing, production planning and the post-war collapse of the Empire.
                Quote: Vasily_Ostrovsky
                If only some more time had passed, class B industries would have caught up...

                They've been working on it for thirty years. Because Class B has always been the Cinderella of Class A. First and foremost, the best—the military-industrial complex. And what it rejects, we'll give to civilians, and hopefully it'll work.
                1. +1
                  13 November 2025 23: 06
                  And this is true, of course...
                  but there is no single truth, as life shows drinks
            2. +2
              13 November 2025 16: 13
              Quote: bug120560
              I have said and I repeat - in the USSR they produced practically everything, mainly from domestic components, and the quality of what was produced was not only not inferior, but some samples even surpassed foreign ones.

              This is probably why imports were considered a symbol of prosperity in the USSR. wink
              Yugoslav boots, Czech crystal, German wall, Finnish plumbing, refrigerator Rozenlev, Finnish, good © etc. I still remember how they chased after color televisions with Japanese picture tubes.
              By the way, my parents still have the GDR wall.
              Quote: bug120560
              But the fact that not everything was on the shelves back then is a completely different story.

              And this was also a problem in the USSR. Where a meat cutter was valued far more than an engineer. And as for a market director... my market one ©.
              Soviet system of funded distribution The TNP created a trading mafia, intertwined with law enforcement and the party and economic leadership. Its main goal was to maintain shortages. And neither prison terms nor executions could eradicate it—under Stalin, Khrushchev, Brezhnev, and so on.
              When the Brezhnevites decided to oust the gaining second secretary, Kozlov, in the early 60s and initiated an investigation into Leningrad trade, the investigation was curtailed after the chairman of the Leningrad City Executive Committee was identified as a suspect. As a result, only the "traders" were brought to trial.
  12. +2
    12 November 2025 11: 31
    Thanks to the author. I'm waiting for something to appear about the "tens," Project 10410. They were pretty good PSKRs. Even though I'm a landlubber, I had the chance to dine on board them and learn some lessons!
    1. +6
      12 November 2025 13: 06
      Thanks for your kind words... wink
      Unfortunately, I don't have any personal experience with the 10410, and therefore no personal feelings about it. I'll talk to the guys who've been working on it, maybe something will come up... soldier
      But about "eating" - that's coming very soon!
  13. +3
    12 November 2025 11: 41
    1124P were not in the border guards and not in the OVR flotilla?
    Great stuff!
    1. +7
      12 November 2025 13: 11
      Indeed, the project itself, with its "P" index, denoted an order from the KGB's Ministry of Emergency Situations. However, its acceptance into service was quite uneven: for example, both the 1124P and 1124 were being built for the border troops simultaneously, often at different factories, sometimes "mixed and matched."

      Many online resources, including Wikipedia, lie about the construction of ships in this series, and not only this one. So, trust the witnesses and participants; they may lie, but it's for the good! drinks
    2. 0
      13 November 2025 15: 57
      Well, I also racked my graying brain and remembered that in Liepaja, on the Baltic, the Project 1124 ships were part of the OVR brigade. Although, perhaps they were also built for the border troops' naval units.
  14. +6
    12 November 2025 12: 38
    Now that's border security! Great job! Thanks for sharing such memories. But now it's nothing but worries and lines.
    1. +7
      12 November 2025 13: 13
      In those distant times / Now almost like epics? ... (V. Vysotsky)
      There wasn't even such a concept as "red lines", at least not at our level.... soldier
  15. -1
    12 November 2025 12: 44
    35 knots, and in the narrows, at full speed, he had to pass the Project 667BRDM SSBN, colloquially known as the “humpbacked one,” behind the massive hump of missile silos behind the conning tower. The commander of the "hunchback" looked stunned and twirled his finger at his temple. I watched the suicidal border guard and potential nuclear bomber rushing like crazy down the fairway...

    And how is the submarine commander wrong?

    Half an hour didn't solve anything, but in the end, naval aviation was even faster...

    And the article is good...
    1. +5
      12 November 2025 13: 22
      The submarine commander is right two hundred times over!!!
      The commander of the PSKR is no less right!
      "A superior's order is law for his subordinates. Orders must be carried out without question, precisely, and on time" – just from memory...
      And half an hour made all the difference. This time was enough to bring the cruiser's guided missiles into combat readiness, input data into the missiles, and launch a disarming strike on the SSBN base.

      These weren't some pot-bellied, half-drunk guys showing up on a half-dead yacht - this was a very powerful US Navy submarine arriving at a missile submarine base - the main threat to the US itself, and the nerves were already worked up to the point of actually opening fire.

      If the commander of the PSKR was a snot-nosed brat, the country would have ceased to exist long ago... and so it is everywhere... negative

      And let me also remind you that they've already started quietly vilifying officers through the media... So why should he bother? He should have stayed in the base, or better yet, sold torpedoes to the Americans and earned enough money to buy a tape recorder... am

      Nothing personal. Just... duty. soldier
      1. -2
        12 November 2025 13: 53
        Quote: Vasily_Ostrovsky
        And half an hour made all the difference. This time was enough to bring the cruiser's guided missiles into combat readiness, input data into the missiles, and launch a disarming strike on the SSBN base.
        belay What prevented them from bringing it into combat readiness BEFORE entering Soviet territorial waters (which is what they probably did? You don't need to enter territorial waters to strike.
        Quote: Vasily_Ostrovsky
        If the commander of the PSKR chewed snot

        Georgiy is not on trial, but if he rammed the submarine, he would have been convicted.
        1. +4
          12 November 2025 14: 30
          This is from the series "If Grandma Were Grandpa..." wassat
          We don't know what the enemy is planning or what they'll dare to do. Therefore, "every cricket knows its place," and there's no point in making a ship's commander the General Secretary of the CPSU Central Committee or the Minister of Defense.

          Completed the task? Well done! Didn't? Head to court. am
          How many soldiers know the plans of the capitalist ministers who are enemies of the Fatherland? Not a single one!
          But he gets up and goes into battle, under bullets and explosions... and I bow low to him...

          And who among us is busy arguing about "why should he fight?" "But he should have surrendered Leningrad, he should have read Operation Barbarossa"... Ugh, how disgusting... That's right – those who do this are people who have no homeland of their own, and who wish death and destruction for both the soldier and the country...
          Like this - will it work?
          1. -2
            12 November 2025 15: 16
            Quote: Vasily_Ostrovsky
            Like this - will it work?

            Yes, anything will do! Yes
    2. +1
      12 November 2025 16: 27
      Quote: Olgovich
      Half an hour didn't solve anything, but in the end, naval aviation was even faster...

      But is it any faster? By the time the order is issued, by the time it reaches the regiment, by the regiment headquarters preparing its documents, briefings, launch, taxiing, and takeoff... in short, the PSKR will have already reached the enemy. smile
      The article, by the way, describes the reaction time of the Navy - ships and aircraft:
      P.S. An hour later The Project 1135 frigate pulled up, smoking like a samovar. The American, according to acoustics, was slapping quietly under the reactor, only the propellers were faintly audible, while our Project 1135 roared loudly across the ocean. Over time Our naval aviation appeared and had fun practicing approaches and attacks.
  16. +2
    12 November 2025 13: 18
    I ask the author to continue his work. Excellent essay.
    1. +4
      12 November 2025 13: 27
      Thank you, of course, but to me, being a writer is like walking to Africa...
      Well, let's improve. drinks
      1. +2
        12 November 2025 13: 42
        Modesty is certainly a virtue, but I'm not the only one asking you to continue showing us your publications. Thank you.
        1. +4
          12 November 2025 14: 21
          Thank you,
          are already being proofread, in continuation...
          I hope soon drinks
  17. +1
    12 November 2025 15: 44
    Thank you. Now all that's left is memories. The Pacific Fleet no longer has the same combat power it had in Soviet times. Many military units have long since been disbanded, their equipment is inoperable or obsolete, and there's little new equipment. Fortunately, the samurai, whose navy is now one of the largest in Asia, aren't particularly aggressive.
    1. +5
      12 November 2025 17: 24
      Quote: Evgeny_Sviridenko
      Thank you. Now all that's left is to remember.


      If we don't remember, no one else will. And then we'll wonder why our history begins with the time of yet another ruler...
      1. +1
        12 November 2025 21: 45
        Yes, exactly. They wrote well about the speed of gas turbines. I've flown on four turbines myself, on the R-42. But unfortunately, only one tragic episode is associated with it – the sinking of the small missile ship "Musson" during exercises. But it's fair to say that exercises in the USSR were sometimes conducted as close to combat as possible...
        1. +1
          13 November 2025 09: 59
          Thank you!
          "Monsoon" - Isn't this the same case where they sank their own ship during missile testing? Either the missile misaimed, or the ship entered the wrong area—I'll have to look at the records, I can't remember right now...
          1. +1
            13 November 2025 15: 15
            Yes, that one. But not in my presence. They were firing target missiles. One of them, the one that hit, was hard to shoot down. And there's something wrong with the Musson, with its speed. They're writing that it was completely stationary, which is absolutely unacceptable. Fuel, oxidizer, and aluminum alloys from the superstructure led to a massive fire and sinking. Now on the Menshikov Peninsula (not far from Sov-Gavan), where I served in the missile boat division, there's nothing left, not even the piers. I imagine things are bleak in Kamchatka, too.
            1. +1
              13 November 2025 15: 21
              When this case was brought to our attention, we were simply stunned... although the case is not unique - there were times when a missile was aimed at a fisherman and then there was no fisherman (or something like that), but to hit the RK - well, we could not have imagined such an outstanding feat back then... I don’t remember the details, because the order only contained the outlines of the case, and even then it was “polished”... but the impression was - they did it...
              1. 0
                14 November 2025 10: 25
                It's most likely a combination of unfavorable factors, a violation of regulations regarding ship speed and launch range, and the capricious nature of the RM-15M target missile itself, which lacked a homing head but had an autopilot, making it much more resistant to damage. Apparently, it was even hit, causing a deviation from its trajectory (it should have flown higher than the ship). But there's still no consensus or consensus. Simply put, those guys were unlucky... There were also cadets, I think...
                1. +1
                  14 November 2025 11: 56
                  Yes, there is no complete picture yet, this needs to be "picked out" and compared and checked throughout the entire naval internet... Someday someone will get around to it, I hope, and they will write something hi
  18. +3
    12 November 2025 17: 08
    These seemingly simple and straightforward essays, with humor and dynamism, are the quintessence of such a "simple" topic: how should one serve?
    And it reads well, just like Gaidar’s stories (the elder one, of course) in childhood, a light pen, as they say.
    Don't give up under any circumstances, while there is still someone and something to remember, but people leave, and with them, the facts.
    1. +5
      12 November 2025 17: 32
      Thank you, very unexpected...

      My family got fed up with it, so I decided to "put it out in writing" feel

      I was reading a commemorative publication about a village in the Far East, where a relative had been among the co-founders since 1894... And the entire founding story in the "jubilee" was a blank... It turns out there was nothing before 1929... I was so annoyed—how can you just abandon your own history? Fools and bureaucrats—that's the real reason for this lack of memory... Fools don't care, and the bureaucrats are worried about anything "controversial" popping up... What a word—"controversial"!
  19. +4
    12 November 2025 18: 10
    "Note: The Project 1124 PSKR "Bditelny" was launched on April 18, 1981, at the Khabarovsk Shipyard, commissioned on September 25, 1981, and decommissioned in 1998..." Incidentally, the "Arkansas" was also decommissioned in 1998. It turned out to be expensive to maintain for the Yankees. PS: I devoured this article in one sitting! We look forward to new articles from the Author!
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. +6
      12 November 2025 18: 36
      Thank you belay

      The country was written off in the 90s... this is worse than a cruiser...

      I just wrote this, then deleted it...

      And so:
      The State Duma refused to raise salaries for conscripts, citing the fact that military service is "not work" and that the Russian Armed Forces have "more pressing needs."

      The State Duma Defense Committee unanimously recommended rejecting an amendment to increase the monthly pay for conscripts to a staggering 7,500 rubles. As a reminder, it currently stands at 2,758 rubles.

      First Deputy Chairman of the State Duma Defense Committee Alexei Zhuravlev stated that raising conscripts' salaries under current conditions is wrong.

      "In the SVO, it's better to pay assault troops more. Conscripts receive full state support—from breakfast, lunch, and dinner to full uniforms. This isn't work for which a salary should be paid, but rather a duty to the Motherland... This is definitely not the budget item we should be focusing on increasing right now—our army has far more pressing needs," Zhuravlev said.
      Earlier, Mikhail Delyagin, Deputy Chairman of the State Duma Committee on Economic Policy, stated that his amendment would help free conscript soldiers from a truly difficult financial situation and would only require a fraction of a percent in funding.

      "Only someone who hasn't done it can claim that conscription isn't like work. After all, in addition to combat training, soldiers often have to carry out chores like construction work, repair and maintenance of equipment, training grounds, and other property," the deputy complained.
      According to Delyagin, the Russian Ministry of Defense "conceptually supported" his idea of ​​an increase, which would require an additional 16,8 billion rubles per year.

      For our part, we note that conscripts have been serving on the border of Russia and Ukraine since the first months of the Second Military District, participating in the defense of border regions, enforcing the counter-terrorist operation regime, protecting the skies from drones, and sometimes even directly engaging in combat, as was the case in the Kursk region, while suffering losses in the process.

      How does all this fit together? And what new feat of labor awaits us from legislators? And we're talking about the navy... And it was... unfortunately, in the past tense...
      1. +1
        12 November 2025 19: 46
        Let us remind you that it currently amounts to 2,758 rubles.
        There's not even enough for cigarettes...
        1. +1
          12 November 2025 20: 00
          Quote: 3x3zsave
          There's not even enough for cigarettes...

          Smoking is harmful... yes...
          And it won't be enough for public transport...
          A soldier in the Soviet Army received 3 rubles 50 kopecks... I hope I'm not mistaken... although the internet says 8 rubles... this means that today a soldier has become even cheaper... maybe I'm missing something?
          1. +2
            12 November 2025 20: 14
            A soldier in the Soviet Army received 3 rubles 50 kopecks... I hope I'm not mistaken... although the internet says 8 rubles...
            To be honest, I don’t remember how much I earned, but it was enough for smoking.
            Smoking is harmful...
            Life in general is a harmful thing, people die from it.
          2. 0
            13 November 2025 22: 53
            I'll correct you, 3.80 for a private, the rest for position and rank, some even received 30 rubles.
            1. +1
              13 November 2025 23: 33
              Quote: nerovnayadoroga
              Let me correct you, 3.80, private.

              Thanks for the clarification, 3 rubles 80 kopecks – yes, that ties in with the memory... it was a long time ago...
              30 re - that's already a sergeant major, probably a company sergeant major somewhere, a conscript...
              1. +1
                13 November 2025 23: 43
                No, no, that's not necessary. A specialist in an army profession, a platoon commander, a sergeant, a senior sergeant, for example, gets 20 rubles, and a junior sergeant, the head of the R-409 radio station, will get 25 rubles, or even more, since he's performing the duties of a warrant officer or lieutenant. A private in the position of deputy head of the KTP gets 4.80 rubles, well, that's about it. That's how it was in the Soviet Army and probably in the Navy too.
                1. +1
                  14 November 2025 00: 18
                  exactly winked
                  and also a corporal - a ruble was immediately added.... wassat
      2. +4
        12 November 2025 19: 54
        As Diana Gurtskaya sang in one cheerful song, "Friendship is not work..."
        And the cheerful (I hope for now) deputies also started singing something.
        Things turned out differently here, unfortunately...
        A soldier (and those taxpayers who pay him) is not a human being. They're similar, yes, they have a debt (not a universal one!), so let them pay it. In kind. Yes, one could consider corvee or quitrent. After all, a debt to the Master can be repaid in different ways.
        It's the same story as when a teacher "provides a service," a doctor needs to be assigned (have his passport taken away?) And a pension is the Lord's charity, like he's letting you live a little longer, when you could...
        I won't hint anything about the deputies or what party they are from - let everyone think for themselves.
        1. +4
          12 November 2025 19: 56
          Sometimes it seems like you're in some kind of looking glass...

          Nothing new - "Oh, the times, oh, the morals!..."
        2. +4
          12 November 2025 20: 20
          Yes, you can think about corvee or quitrent.
          Anecdote:
          "The State Duma is in session.
          Presiding:
          - Well, gentlemen deputies, we have all become respectable people, isn’t it time to think about the people?
          Voice from the audience:
          - Yes, two hundred souls would be nice!
          1. +2
            13 November 2025 13: 58
            Maybe you're laughing in vain...
            Never say never... there children and grandchildren are already receiving local nobility...
      3. +4
        12 November 2025 20: 01
        During my conscription in 2011/2012, my salary for the first six months was 250 rubles gross, 200 rubles per month after deducting office expenses. From the beginning of 2012, my salary was 2500 rubles gross and 2000 rubles net. However, after the raise, I didn't get any pay for five months—it was only given to me before my discharge. So, over 13 years, conscripts' salaries were only raised by 200 rubles.
        1. +1
          12 November 2025 20: 03
          I didn't expect the picture to be so... brutal...

          Quote: Nikolay293
          During my military service in 2011/2012, my salary for the first six months was 250 rubles gross, after deducting 200 rubles per month for office supplies. From the beginning of 2012, my salary was 2500 rubles gross and 2000 rubles net.
          1. +4
            12 November 2025 20: 16
            It's just that starting from 11-12, the actual figures, in comparison (as they say, purchasing power), can easily be halved, or even divided by three.
            1. +1
              12 November 2025 20: 37
              or even divide by three.
              I hope not for four...
              1. +3
                13 November 2025 14: 02
                It's sad... the deputies' salaries should be reduced by at least 100 - they still don't earn as much as they're paid, at least in terms of the quality of regulations - I can attest to this as an expert... With this savings, conscripts could also get a thousand more...

                A soldier/sailor is not a worker, that's a fact. Service is their destiny. But reducing them to the level of beasts is also wrong... A slave is also fed, watered, and given a roof over his head... it's all disgusting...
  20. +4
    12 November 2025 20: 34
    Excellent material good Bravo to the author! hi
    And the atmosphere in the comments, thanks to the forum members, was very friendly and interesting. Yes
    1. +2
      12 November 2025 20: 43
      And the atmosphere in the comments, thanks to the forum members, was very friendly and interesting.
      This is always the case when it comes to real-life cases witnessed by us. Remember the popularity of Bezlyudov's "stories."
      Hello, Sergey!
      1. +2
        12 November 2025 20: 47
        Good evening, Anton!
        Remember the popularity of Bezlyudov's "stories"
        ,, recourse I'm ashamed to admit who you're talking about?
        1. +1
          12 November 2025 21: 06
          I'm ashamed to admit who you're talking about?
          You're really stressing me out now! Didn't you read something?
          I'll try to find a link to the author.
        2. +2
          12 November 2025 21: 26
          This author:
          https://topwar.ru/user/Bez%20310/
          1. +2
            12 November 2025 21: 35
            3x3zsave
            +1
            Today, 22:

            I read it, of course.
      2. +1
        12 November 2025 20: 51
        when it comes to real cases
        ,,,it's true.
        I liked the way Alex TV wrote, everything was also from life.
        Vasily O. writes about the sea, which is interesting to me. Maybe it caught on when my father told me about his service in Severomorsk. He can still talk about it to this day: the sea, the hills, the tundra, the adits.
        1. +2
          12 November 2025 22: 18
          I liked the way Alex TV wrote,
          Blessed memory! He passed away too soon...
          1. +1
            15 November 2025 07: 56
            gone

            Hello Anton! Hello Sergey!
            And to be honest, I really liked Privalov as an author, it’s such a pity that he doesn’t write for *VO* anymore. The *Liner* series was simply magnificent!
    2. +2
      13 November 2025 10: 13
      Thank you feel
      And you were right about the atmosphere... drinks
  21. +4
    12 November 2025 21: 53
    The article is super, as already said, I read it in one breath!
    But our "motorcycles" weren't 1124Ps, they were P1124s! True, when I was there, they didn't call our ZORKY a motorcycle—it's about the Albatross! When I arrived at the Division (in the fall of 2001), it was the only one left of the five. Vigilant and Impeccable were apparently dragged off to Vladivostok, while Reshitelny and Smely were lying on their sides in a nearby bay! And the ZORKY didn't last long either; it was decommissioned in the summer of 2006!
    There were five 97Ps, the Volga and Neva are still in service! But there were three 745Ps: Kamchatka, Brest, and Sakhalin. There was also the Amur, but by that time it had been transferred to Shikotan in the 8th OBSKR!
    Also 1135.1 and not 1135p!
    The last 1135.1 Red Banner PSKR "DZERZHINSKY" and PSKR "OREL" left on their last voyage from Solenoe Ozero Bay on July 7th of this year, and are now being cut up for scrap metal!
    1. +1
      13 November 2025 10: 29
      Thank you wink

      My articles about affairs and people from the late 70s to the early 90s, and up to 2001, a lot of water has passed under the bridge... I knew many commanders personally, from green lieutenants to already quite naval "villains"...
      Trying to establish ship references has become much more difficult now than it was 40 years ago – everyone is posting project codes, construction years, and shipyards on various platforms, and very often errors accumulate, and the nonsense continues. As for the 1124, well, some are for the woods, some for firewood... for every taste – they'll write any letters...
      And then - His Majesty "Copy-Past" - and that's it, the most stupid disinformation began to wander through the pages... and nothing saves - admirals multiply stupidities just as much as those who have never served, because fact-checking is an admiral's job...
      About ten years ago, I reprimanded an old acquaintance about factual errors in his work at the academy... Well, he replied: it's not a royal job to check numbers and years - that's what senior lieutenants are for... And so his opus circulated...

      I strive to verify my articles as much as possible, but even that is difficult – there are almost no real sources, and the factory documentation often has not survived... Sometimes it is even easier to read the ZAS journal than to find an ancient order for the commissioning of a ship...
    2. +1
      13 November 2025 10: 50
      I hope you won't be offended - I'll correct you: the division also had a Red Banner ship - the KPSKR "Kirov", in my childhood - Project 264A...
      1. 0
        13 November 2025 22: 02
        There would have been a second Red Banner Project 1135.1, but it was given to Ukraine, and only Dzerzhinsky remained!
        And so the first Red Banner "DZERZHINSKY" and "KIROV" were Italian-built, they were awarded the Order of the Red Banner on September 19, 1945, for participating in the Kuril landing operation!
        1. +1
          13 November 2025 23: 30
          And great, that's what I told you about...
          But you are again avoiding the thesis about the two Red Banner ships... the history of military unit 2376 (what is your nickname, it is from there) smile) Without "Kirov" there is no history. After the collapse of the country, the authorities are trying to abandon everything Soviet, and write a new history in its place... but that doesn't work - you can't throw out convenient or inconvenient facts from history...

          History itself punishes us for not learning it well... No history means no continuity, no tradition... Do you think new traditions will survive? Unlikely, because they lack the history, the legacy of many generations...
          I would prohibit by law the changing of historical names, city names, and the like... can exceptions be made? I'm not sure...
          1. 0
            14 November 2025 00: 01
            Yes, my nickname is connected with our Kamchatka unit of border patrol ships; I served on the Zorky, but already in the Marine Guard of the Federal Border Service of Russia!
            I'm not overlooking our only two Red Banner border patrol ships. I don't know the history of our unit in detail, of course, but I know the main stages of their development! And when you say we had two Red Banner ships, some people don't even know we had them! And if you dig deeper, there was another Red Banner, but it's rarely mentioned, and there were no subsequent generations! So, only our two Red Banner border patrol ships, the DZERZHINSKY and KIROV, have made their mark on history! I wonder whether the new DZERZHINSKY, Project 23550, will inherit the Red Banner designation or just the name of its predecessor!
            Here's what I know, and the history of our unit: the first border patrol frigate was the Vorovsky, formerly the dispatch vessel Yaroslavna. There was, however, another dispatch vessel that had appeared in Kamchatka even earlier, the Admiral Zavoiko, which was later sent to Vladivostok, renamed the patrol frigate KRASNY VYMPEL, and armed accordingly! Then came the future Red Banner frigates DZERZHINSKY and KIROV, which were initially simply PS, and only later, at the request of their crews, were they renamed DZERZHINSKY and KIROV! The unit's history begins on September 3, 45. It was originally the 22nd Division. On February 7, 1967, it was renamed the 7th Separate Brigade. On April 30, 75, the Brigade was awarded the Order of the Red Banner. I believe it was renamed a Division in August 77. On August 21, 85, the Division was awarded the Red Banner. I wonder what the banner was during this historical period between 77 and 85? For some reason, there's no information anywhere! But that's about all I know about our unit! I can also list almost all the ships that served in Salt Lake, starting with the first Vorovsky. That's almost 59 ships. I won't go into detail, and I might stumble over the minesweepers, especially those transferred from the navy!
            I am not an expert on the history of our unit, but I remember the main stages!
            1. +1
              14 November 2025 00: 16
              Thank you, it's very nice to meet Kamchadals here drinks soldier
              There are, of course, more than 59 ships, but the number of names/designations is probably the same...
              All 1124 did not inherit the old names - Vigilant, Resolute, Impeccable, Brave, Sharp-sighted...
              Not all minesweepers inherited their names either: the Kirov and Vorovsky minesweepers received their successors. Lekarev, however, didn't inherit them. Instead, the "Named After... Congress" appeared, which they later began renaming during Gorbachev's anti-Soviet period.
              Sometime later, I might put together a small compilation for reference to one of the articles...
              1. +1
                14 November 2025 00: 47
                Before our Zorky Project P1124, there was another border guard ship, the ZORKY, but it didn't last long as a border guard ship. It was later transferred to the SKR. I don't remember the project, but I need to look in my bookmarks; there's a little information about it online! So it turns out that the Navy and the Ministry of Emergency Situations had ships named Zorky at the same time! They planned to build seven Albatrosses for the Ministry of Emergency Situations at the Khabarovsk Shipyard, but alas, only five were built. Verny, Srogy, or Bravy—I can't remember exactly—were never completed; they were scrapped for scrap metal on the slipway, but that's just a rough idea; I don't remember the details!
                1. +2
                  14 November 2025 11: 51
                  Quote: Sergey2376
                  but Verny, Srogy or Bravy, I don’t remember exactly, were never completed, so they were cut up for metal on the stocks,


                  Yes, narcissists, alcoholics, "reformers" and other enemies of the people came to power, and as always in such times (remember Khrushchev) - everything was put under the knife...

                  The results of these rulers' actions are comparable to the damage inflicted on the country during the Great Patriotic War... although they managed without great human losses... but even here it is a question of evaluation...

                  Let me remind you once again about the Kirov—there have been so many ships with that name in so many different versions! From a nuclear cruiser to a PSKR...
              2. +1
                14 November 2025 00: 50
                More names were inherited from the minesweepers to the new 1135.1, these are Vorovsky, Dzerzhinsky, Kedrov and Menzhinsky, but the last one served in Nakhodka, it was the lead ship among the 1135.1, then Dzerzhinsky came to us!
  22. 0
    12 November 2025 23: 03
    Several years ago, before the war, a British naval vessel, the Defender, was "forced out" in exactly the same way when it violated the maritime border, and even earlier, during the Soviet era, a US warship was "forced out." Why are maritime border violators "forced out" at the risk of their lives, rather than detained with force, as at a land border.
    1. +2
      13 November 2025 14: 58
      That's the thing, at sea everything is different from on land, the peculiarities of service...

      An enemy ship is the form, type, and content of a foreign state's military service. It cannot be detained or arrested, nor can any person or service board it, nor can it be used by any other state to carry out any actions.

      Otherwise - up to war...

      That's why they are not detained or captured - they are forced out, they can be rammed - but using weapons is bad form...

      And in addition to this, the international law of the sea itself... Let me remind you that it is written on the basis of British law, and in English as a basis.

      And the interpretations there range from lunch to the fence... The USSR, and earlier the Russian Empire, defended their interests as best they could back then, but most countries were Anglophone and under their influence, so we should be grateful that they at least defended something...
      1. 0
        13 November 2025 16: 55
        It is not possible to use weapons, but it is possible to “force out” by threatening a collision?
        At best, any ramming ends in damage to ships, as happened in the Black Sea during the "displacement" of a US warship. This is the best-case scenario, but at worst, a displacement by this method could result in an ammunition explosion and the sinking of the ship. What reaction can be expected to the sinking of a foreign warship in peacetime?
        Vladimir Putin commented on the British Defender's incursion into Russian territorial waters near the Black Sea Fleet's main base as follows: "They could have sunk it, they could have, but they allowed it to leave with impunity, and impunity encourages permissiveness."
        1. +1
          13 November 2025 23: 12
          Quote: Jacques Sekavar
          It is not possible to use weapons, but it is possible to “force out” by threatening a collision?

          One can wassat
          The president said they could have sunk it. The key word here is "could"... in life, nothing is as it seems. wassat
  23. +1
    12 November 2025 23: 14
    In the Pacific Ocean, in the Pacific Ocean, ships are on sea duty...Vasily, thank you very much!!! We look forward to more... good
    1. +1
      13 November 2025 10: 51
      Thank you wink
      There will be a continuation drinks
  24. +1
    13 November 2025 04: 07
    Excellent article! I was serving my enlistment in a separate reconnaissance brigade at the time. As the Arkansas entered Avacha Bay, we were alerted and stationed at observation posts along the coast. I was specifically stationed at Mount Tolsty Mys, above Khalaktyrsky Beach (black sands). It probably wasn't much use, but that's what service is...
    1. +1
      14 November 2025 14: 50
      There was some sense, especially at Khalaktyrka wassat
      Then the hair stood on end not only on the bald admirals drinks soldier
      May the admirals forgive me... wassat
  25. +1
    13 November 2025 07: 22
    Easy. In one breath. Author, write more. Navy men are strong!!
    1. +1
      13 November 2025 10: 52
      Thank you hi
      We write, we try... even our pens rustle. feel
  26. +1
    13 November 2025 09: 40
    Excellent story - there hasn't been one about sea border guards yet!
    1. +2
      13 November 2025 10: 54
      Thank you,
      And there was already a post about the naval border guards - https://topwar.ru/273019-sejchas-kak-rvanet-kak-bylo-to-chego-nikogda-ne-bylo.html
  27. +1
    13 November 2025 11: 56
    "...a nuclear-powered strategic missile submarine, Project 667BRDM, entered the bay from an autonomous position." Clarification: 667BDR. BRDMs were (and still are) only in the Northern Fleet. BDRs were in Vilyuchinsk.
    1. +2
      13 November 2025 13: 36
      I already got a slap on the wrist for BDRM from 955535, so I won't digress. Well, that's not what the article is about after all... I'm double-checking now; opinions differ among those who served in those days...
      I'll make a correction to the printed version, let it be BDR... And that's a barn, and this laughing laughing
      Submariners, don't be offended - for a surface ship, anything larger than a surface ship is a "shed," and even though I trained in a submarine class, I served on a surface ship...
      1. 0
        13 November 2025 15: 21
        Yes, they're almost identical in terms of the "hump." Only the missiles inside are different.
        1. +2
          13 November 2025 15: 25
          I once happened to drop in at Krasheninnikov's to see my classmates, they invited me on a boat, and I stupidly agreed to climb onto the hump... I was so scared - the blockheads below were laughing - they sounded the alarm, they were about to open the mine covers" ... villains... drinks
          and now I can't stop laughing... laughing
  28. +1
    13 November 2025 13: 57
    The article is simply captivating. BUT please explain this to me, a landlubber. The alert has been sounded. Everything is in its place. The situation is constantly changing. Every second is precious. And then the boatswain announces that everyone needs to change into dress uniform. HOW am I supposed to understand that? 8-)
    1. +5
      13 November 2025 14: 20
      Thank you for both the rating and the super cool question! Honestly!

      This is the great difference between the naval service and any other - and let the infantry, artillerymen, missilemen or pilots not be angry - all service is held in high esteem wink

      But at sea you can’t give the command “to the right!” or “Stop!”, and even more so “Run!”

      The ship couldn't care less about the twitching of the big bosses - the laws of physics, hydrodynamics, mechanics and other fun stuff of naval service don't give a damn about the desire to get everything right away, preferably on a tablecloth and in a plate wassat

      The commander gives the command, "Stop the engines," and the ship continues to roll/move along under inertia for another 2-4-6 miles, that is, from 3,5 km to a mind-boggling 10 km... You want "immediately"? Then it's "stop the engines, full reverse"... and even then, the inertia is, well, about 500 meters, depending on the initial speed...

      And so it is in the navy - everything...

      Yes, the ship is sailing at full capacity, in full view of the enemy. The situation... changes, but not like a racing car... personnel from combat stations, taking turns, run and change, as ordered by the GKP – the main command post. And interchangeability, by the way, is constantly practiced during training on the ship, so there are no surprises here...

      What's unexpected is the commander's unconventional decision—by ordering the personnel to change clothes, he simultaneously gave the men the opportunity to comprehend the tension and extreme danger of the moment... Incidentally, it was the commander who took the risk. But the crew was worthy of their commander; even now, they remember him and this incident with emotion...

      That's how it should be understood: the crew is like soldiers defending the Motherland. If necessary, they will go to the end, but they will complete the task without bringing shame upon themselves. soldier
    2. 0
      13 November 2025 15: 45
      It's a ritual. Again, in the navy, everything is slow (only anti-ship missiles fly fast).
      1. +1
        14 November 2025 12: 03
        Quote: Bersaglieri
        Again, in the navy, everything is not fast.


        I once happened to hear a boatswain's joke to the sailors during a dispersal for ship work:

        "Only rust appears quickly in the navy." So, we arm ourselves with scrapers and wire brushes (or wire brushes? Oh, I can't remember...), and get primer and paint from the stockman! "Disperse!"
  29. +2
    13 November 2025 15: 09
    I remembered a song by Rosenbaum, there are these lines:
    "Dress for the first term, brothers, for the first term!
    "Sailors are supposed to go out to battle in clean clothes!"
    Thanks to the author. I read it with pleasure, felt the sailors' emotions, and remembered the song. It was very touching.
    1. +2
      14 November 2025 00: 26
      Thank you feel

      Wartime sailors told me about their first term in battle...
  30. +1
    13 November 2025 15: 50
    This is what movies should be made about, not about whores and bandits.
    1. +1
      14 November 2025 00: 27
      And who will provide the budget?
      Who are the sponsors?
      That's right - those you listed are the ones they're filming about. am
  31. +1
    13 November 2025 16: 55
    Excellent. Similar provocations were carried out in the Black Sea, and people were thrown out in similar fashion.
  32. +1
    13 November 2025 19: 28
    Quote: Vasily_Ostrovsky
    Reduce the salaries of deputies by at least 100 thousand - they still don't earn as much as they are paid...

    Well, you shouldn't say that.
    "The State Duma debated Cheburashka's nationality... The discussion was sparked by an amendment regarding funding for the "Native Toy" competition. "Do you remember where oranges were brought to the Soviet Union—was it the only country from which they were imported? Don't you remember? They were imported from Israel. Cheburashka is Jewish. He came from there in a barrel of oranges. He's from abroad," said Makarov (Chairman of the State Duma Committee on Budget and Taxes).
    Deputies proposed another version of Cheburashka's origin, pointing to the import of citrus fruits from Morocco and Spain.
    Quote from RBC, there's a video, https://www.rbc.ru/rbcfreenews/6915c7ff9a79477222a99c51 , if you want to look at cheerful and successful people...
    So, apparently, all the remaining issues have been successfully and efficiently resolved. Well, the only thing left to clarify is Gena the Crocodile's citizenship.
    And you immediately cut my salary by 100,000 rubles. Especially since it's just cashback...

    Thank you very much for your articles, I look forward to others.
    1. +3
      14 November 2025 00: 30
      Thanks for your kind words drinks write hi

      Yes, I read about this poor guy's nationality... I didn't believe it, but I double-checked it with other sources - it's all true... They thought they'd hit rock bottom, and then they knocked from below...
  33. +1
    17 November 2025 10: 54
    Bravo!!! In full dress and with the anthem, death is not scary.
    1. 0
      17 November 2025 13: 00
      Quote: lin
      in full dress and with the anthem, and death is not scary


      And so it is.

      A Russian proverb says: "Even death is beautiful in peace!"

      So, everything has already been invented before us. soldier
  34. 0
    2 March 2026 16: 11
    Cases of bygone days,
    Lying of antiquity deep.
    The cruiser "Arkansas" was also decommissioned on July 7, 1998, the same year as the PSKR "Bditelny".