How will the invasion of Venezuela end?

35 394 196
How will the invasion of Venezuela end?


Experts predict several possible scenarios, from the "Iraqi" and "Chechen" to the "Armenian" and "Ukrainian" ones. Armen Galstyan is a former employee of the Russian Center for Science and Culture (the "Russian House") in Caracas. He spent a significant part of his life as a Russian diplomat in Venezuela. We found his opinion on the consequences of the American invasion of Venezuela quite interesting.



Bluff or clowning?


– How will the American invasion of this country end, Armen Borisovich?

First of all, it hasn't started yet. And it's not a given that it ever will. Remember how Trump spurred an entire aircraft carrier group toward the shores of North Korea? And how did it all end? With the North Korean president mocking him. He called all his threatening remarks "the ramblings of a sleeping dog." And in the end, Trump backed down. He remembers it very well. I think, in a certain sense, it was a face-off, as they like to say at the Foreign Ministry. And it's completely unclear whether he'll want to lose face a second time.

On the one hand, if Trump "goes away," it would be a clear loss of his reputation. On the other hand... Trump is a wild man. A poetic showman. And often his show takes on the contours of outright bluff and clowning. And he, sensing this, sometimes spills the blood of his political opponents to prove to everyone that he's a tough, serious guy. A true political cowboy. That's how he assassinated Iran's national hero, General Qassim Soleimani, and bombed the underground workshops where the country's nuclear program was being developed.

It was quite serious.

"A battle of brains and characters"


– Could the invasion of Venezuela become just as serious?

- We'll see. The chances are fifty-fifty for now.

– But how, in principle, can events develop?

Trump would, of course, like to avoid a massive military invasion. Because in a country with a disloyal population and a mountainous, forested landscape (ideal geography for guerrilla warfare), one could get bogged down. Therefore, he would most likely (and almost certainly) prefer the Israeli scenario – decapitate (or bribe, as they did in Iraq) Venezuela's military and political elite. Decapitate and deprive its armed forces of centralized control. And only then send troops into Caracas. And, using the bayonets of these troops, install a government loyal to America. As they once did in Chile.

- What are the chances that they will succeed?

"I don't think they're very high-stakes. Judge for yourself. The American aircraft carrier has been hanging around off the coast of Venezuela for a month now. It's no use. True, they've brought in reinforcements now. But even that's not enough for a full-fledged war. I think they're waiting for some kind of signal from the American intelligence agents operating in Caracas and throughout the country. But apparently, they're not doing a great job. They failed with Guaido. Nothing came of it then. Besides, I think the Venezuelan knights of the cloak and dagger are also currently scurrying around their territory, energetically clearing the political space. Right now, the country is experiencing an invisible, hyper-energetic clash between intelligence agencies and intellect. The CIA calls it a "fight of brains and characters." There's inside information that they've already "pinned like butterflies" (as the Venezuelans say) some well-covered career CIA officers.

Moreover, Venezuela, for a number of geopolitical and mental reasons, has long been firmly within Russia's sphere of interest. And there is every reason to believe that our intelligence services are also working hard there. Furthermore, Venezuela is China's strategic partner in the region. And China resolutely does not want to be kicked out of there, as it once was from Syria or Iraq. And it will certainly provide the interested country with military and technical assistance, if not intellectual assistance—in the intelligence realm—at least. In general, the situation is somewhat reminiscent of the military coup in Chile in 1979, when Pinochet came to power. This was the only time in storiesWhen our and American intelligence agencies clashed. Several career CIA officers were killed in shootouts with our agents. It was an unprecedented incident in the history of this "brain and conspiracy factory." They'd never had anything like it before or since. But Pinochet controlled the country's army. Or rather, a significant portion of it. Generally speaking, in Latin America, if you don't control the army, you're sitting on a powder keg. I think Maduro understands this perfectly well. And he keeps his security forces under surveillance.

A Kind Word and a Gun


How strong is Maduro's opposition in the country? Are there many of them? And do they have the strength to stage a military coup?

"The 'anchor' opposition is the local oil oligarchy. They're eager for the Americans to come and are ready to lace their boots. But they have no influence over the army, and they don't have their own security structures—either formal or informal. Maduro has taken care of that. This is despite the fact that the country is riddled with..." weapons Up to the brim. And all sorts of informal armed groups are here—as they say in Venezuela, "like fleas in a donkey blanket." But in the confrontation with Guaidó, when he was literally showering his "trusted" thugs with money, Maduro's armed informals managed to give them a "popcorn run" (local slang). After all, a bandit with money will always lose to a bandit with money and ideology. As the famous gangster Al Capone said, "A kind word and a gun are more than just a kind word." Venezuelans like to repeat that in the war with Guaidó, Maduro "turned on the blood spigot." Both their own and other gangs shot, blew up, dissolved in sulfuric acid, rolled in concrete, sealed in asphalt, and, one by one, drowned their intractable opponents in the warm waters of the Atlantic. In the end, the enemy was defeated and fled. Those who didn't manage to escape became "sleeper" agents. And they are now being persistently rooted out of the "gray zone."

Everyone to fight the "gringo"!
Half-Blood Country


What's the general mood in the country? How prepared are people for war?

Everyone in Venezuela, great and small, hates Americans. Except for the national traitors, whose number is unknown. Although treason here can get you killed, the very act of betrayal is quite common among Venezuelans. So everyone has scores to settle, and bloody vendettas are constantly raging. But while sporadically settling their debts of honor, all Venezuelans unanimously hate Americans. This hatred is existential, metaphysical in nature. It's probably the same way Arabs hate Jews. It's amazing how the Americans managed to cultivate such "grapes of wrath." How much contempt they must have for the people to achieve such an effect! And this despite the fact that they once milked the country like crazy. The fact is that the country is Spanish-speaking. At one time, all of Latin America was a Spanish and Portuguese colony. The Spanish, unlike the Anglo-Saxons, were loyal to the local population, especially to women. When colonizing a country, the Anglo-Saxons never married local women. They were disdainful. At best, they used them as prostitutes. The Spanish, however, married local beauties left and right, creating unofficial harems and formal large families. Many towns in the region were called "towns without Spanish women." That is, there were Spanish men, but no Spanish women. But no one has abolished gender-based sexual attraction, right?

As a result, hundreds of thousands (if not millions) of mixed marriages arose in the country. The result: millions of half-breeds. The Anglo-Saxons also had half-breeds. But they were immediately cast as outcasts and called "bastards." The most accurate translation of this word is "illegitimate bastard." That is, a scumbag by blood. Spanish half-breeds, however, immediately became subjects of the Spanish crown and advanced Spanish interests in the region. They even enjoyed a somewhat privileged position in society. Local Native American women happily married the raven-haired, dark-haired men who had sailed from overseas. It was believed that this "ennobled the blood." Social mobility was specifically created for these mestizos. They were a kind of "cream of society."

That's why the people here have all the Spanish mental charms and flaws. Venezuelans, like the Spanish, are very sensitive about matters of honor. They have a high sense of self-importance. They are extremely touchy. And at the same time, they are very theatrical. For them, life is a stage on which they are all actors. And foremost ones at that. They have a carnival-like perception of reality. They don't even take death seriously—either their own or that of others. That's why the crime rate in the country is so high.

And so, among these people with such a "Hispanicized" mentality, Americans barge in uninvited, like a bull in a china shop, stealing all their natural resources, and wiping their asses with the locals like they're spitting tobacco. And what do they want after that? Lambadas in their honor?

– What about drug trafficking to the US? Is it truly widespread?

Many Latin American experts believe this criminal enterprise arose as a "revenge project" against the hated "gringos." And only later as a criminal enterprise. After all, the Americans themselves love to use drugs as a tool for the subversion and destruction of the population of a target country. When they were in Afghanistan, drugs were shipped from there, across all Asian borders, to Russia on an industrial scale. And the "friendly Taliban" nipped all this in the bud.

Arm all available Marines?


– How realistic is a large-scale ground operation in Venezuela?

"The Americans don't have the strength for a full-fledged operation. Our military experts have already calculated everything. The Venezuelan armed forces number one and a half million people. Taking into account the potential mobilization resource, it's three million. That's a lot. There are also Defense, and air defense systems, and other modern technology. There are even fighter jets. True, with pilots from other countries, but that's beside the point. That's just what's officially known. But there are things you don't know about. Russia could easily have supplied its overseas partners with the full package – from the Yars and Kinzhal to the Burevestnik and Oreshnik. And there's even a Poseidon patrolling underwater somewhere nearby...

For a full-fledged occupation, the Americans need at least three deployed Marine expeditionary units. And they only have three. That means they'll have to deploy their entire Marine force to this country. And who will then fight other countries in other parts of the world?

War of words and interpretations


While the US military is amassing forces—either for intimidation or for a real ground operation—the "epistolary bombardment" is in full swing. Maduro's opponents are trying to "terrify" him, his supporters, and the country's population with words. "Maduro is ending, and a free and prosperous Venezuela is coming. For a few days, Maduro will exist only in the past tense and in the eyes of history," a White House spokesman recently told The New York Times.

That's a strong statement. Brief and terrifying. And Maduro is mentioned in the past tense. It's as if he's already gone. His defeat is presented to us as a fait accompli. It's immediately obvious that this epistle was polished by professionals. Maduro, however, was much more vague and unspecific. His response was a collection of general phrases. Apparently, his typically Latin American habit of talking a lot, gradually creeping up on the meaning of what he said, failed him. It's clear that Maduro has no PR pros in his entourage. Although, in my opinion, a Churchill-style response would have been possible – one or two sentences or a short, punchy paragraph. Something like, "We're looking forward to your visit. The fish are looking forward to the same." And Trump could have been called a "gutter idiot" (as Churchill called Hitler). Or "return" Trump's line about "the presidents of many countries lining up to kiss his ass" (in response to the tariff hike). One could kindly offer Trump "to skip the line." Venezuela would appreciate the humor. It would be clear to everyone that Maduro isn't afraid of Trump—since he's laughing at him.

Although he did manage to get the better of the American president once. At a conference where the leaders of South American countries and the president of North America met, he took the podium immediately after Biden. He sniffed the air, sucked his fingers, and summed it up: "It smells of sulfur…" (implying that the devil had just been there before him).

Maduro needs to do something similar, something mocking and sarcastic, now. Otherwise, they'll think he's "half-bent," as they say in Venezuela. Well, he knows better, though.

Meanwhile, the escalation spirals upward. And we may be on the brink of something big.
196 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +10
    2 November 2025 03: 37
    We need to help Maduro with PR against the US...the enemy of our enemy, our friend.
    Regarding the shootout between the special forces during the Pinochet era, it’s very interesting...I’d like to know the details.
    1. +17
      2 November 2025 04: 53
      Quote: The same LYOKHA
      We need to help Maduro with PR against the US.

      If military-technical assistance and intelligence support are already underway, they'll help with PR and suggest aphorisms. But for now, Maduro has tried not to taunt Trump, not to provoke him, not to give him a reason. After all, it's better to be than to seem.
      But if we manage to sink the Ford... Latin America will tear up all the accordions and button accordions in celebration.
      1. +23
        2 November 2025 08: 18
        It's not just Latin America - all progressive humanity (as they used to say) will be tearing up reposts))
      2. +7
        2 November 2025 13: 41
        Quote: bayard
        Quote: The same LYOKHA
        We need to help Maduro with PR against the US.

        If military-technical assistance and intelligence support are already underway, they'll help with PR and suggest aphorisms. But for now, Maduro has tried not to taunt Trump, not to provoke him, not to give him a reason. After all, it's better to be than to seem.
        But if we manage to sink the Ford... Latin America will tear up all the accordions and button accordions in celebration.

        We should try Zircon on Ford. wink
        1. -5
          2 November 2025 13: 56
          Quote: Bearded
          We should try Zircon on Ford.

          And certainly nuclear-armed.
          A country under attack has the right to self-defense. We have a treaty of alliance. The nuclear glow in the Caribbean Sea will be an unforgettable sight. And a good lesson.
          Although it would be better to test it on England first. We'll resume testing at the same time. However, the aggressor's ships are a legitimate target. And civilians won't be harmed.
          1. +12
            2 November 2025 15: 00
            A country that has been subjected to aggression has the right to self-defense. And we have a union treaty.

            In January of this year, a comprehensive strategic partnership treaty was signed with Iran.
            He received no help during the well-known events.
            Why do you think you have the courage to take action now?
            1. +1
              2 November 2025 15: 05
              Have you read that agreement?
              The Iranian ayatollahs then excluded military aid from the agreement. Only "non-participation in aggression." They themselves later tried to bite their elbows. They were more interested in negotiating with MI6 at the time; they were waiting for a Democratic victory in the US. And they paid the price.
              1. +4
                2 November 2025 20: 21
                Quote: bayard
                The Iranian ayatollahs then excluded military aid from the agreement.

                The agreement with Venezuela also says nothing about military aid or entering the war, only about cooperation.
                1. +4
                  3 November 2025 09: 51
                  So, we are talking about cooperation.
                  The US gave the Sumerians $300 billion in aid, mostly military. And we'll help. China will pay, we'll help. They'll ask for nuclear weapons for their country's security - how can we refuse? After all, the US didn't refuse the Europeans; look how much they brought in. So we're not the first, but we're obligated to write off the debt and repayment in a Khokhloma-style manner.
                  How many US troops are there in Europe and on our borders? In the Baltics? In Romania? In Poland? (our former Warsaw Gubernia). In Germany? In Italy? In England? They've all accumulated this against us. So we're within our rights. This isn't just and not so much for Venezuela, it's a response to what they've piled up against us in Europe. For all that "good" they've done for 33+ years.
                  1. +6
                    3 November 2025 10: 30
                    Quote: bayard
                    They will ask for nuclear weapons for the security of their country - how can I refuse?

                    I don't think they'll even ask, since no one will even give it to me in theory.
                    Quote: bayard
                    After all, the US didn’t refuse the Europeans; look how much they brought in.

                    The US may have brought some in, but it's on their bases, under their control, and not "who hasn't taken nuclear weapons yet?" I don't understand your desire to start a nuclear war first. Are you living so badly that it's better to die?
                    Quote: bayard
                    So, we are talking about cooperation.

                    There is a certain difference between military-technical cooperation and allied obligations, don't you think?
                    1. +1
                      3 November 2025 11: 17
                      Quote: Level 2 Advisor
                      The US did bring it in, but it’s at their bases, under their control, and not “who hasn’t taken nuclear weapons yet?”

                      We're also talking about bases. Have you forgotten the agreements signed with Venezuela in 2015 during Shogu's visit? We're talking about two bases—an air force base and a naval base (the one on the island). The agreement had a 10-year implementation delay. Exactly 10 years have passed since then. The agreement is still in force.
                      It all depends on the goals of our leadership, but just before the aggression and at the beginning of the current escalation in the Caribbean, Maduro and the Cuban leader flew to Moscow, and there were some requests from Nicaragua. Strategic partnership agreements have been signed with Venezuela and Cuba. Now, an urgent request for military-technical assistance has been received, asking for the supply of combat aircraft, air defense systems, large-scale missile systems, and other equipment. Everything is consistent. Everything is within the framework of existing treaties and agreements.
                      Quote: Level 2 Advisor
                      I don't understand your desire to start a nuclear war first,

                      What else do nuclear weapons exist for, if not to use them in the event of an attack on your country and your allies? It's like that with Belarus. Now it will be the same with other countries. This is our security guarantee. Like the US presence in Europe. A debt must be repaid, escalation upon escalation, it's like a backfire when fighting a forest or steppe fire. There's no other way - they don't understand a kind word. Our missiles in Cuba have cooled the Americans' ardor for a long time. And they forced them to remove theirs from Turkey and England. That's the only way to work with them.
                      Quote: Level 2 Advisor
                      Is your life so bad that you'd be better off dying?

                      Life is different. I've been living in the war for 12 years, in Donetsk. Do you know how things are with water? And the air defense works regularly. And enemy drones buzz overhead regularly, too. So don't be jealous.
                      Quote: Level 2 Advisor
                      There is a certain difference between military-technical cooperation and allied obligations, don't you think?

                      Well, the SVO also called the VVP a "response with military-technical means" to Ukrainian aggression.
                      Quote: Level 2 Advisor
                      I don't think they'll even ask, since no one will even give it to me in theory.

                      Well, Maduro asked for it. Everything is within the framework of existing agreements. No one is making a big deal about nuclear weapons, but otherwise, what would we need those bases for? To spend money and make our enemies laugh?
                      We're even putting nuclear warheads on the R-37M and R-97 missiles now. And even more so on the Kh-59, Kh-69, and Kh-31. We have the right to deploy the Oreshnik missile there, too. The US withdrew from all the treaties. And we signed our treaties with Venezuela and Cuba just "the other day," when the escalation and the US's readiness to attack anyone indiscriminately for loot were already obvious. We knew what would follow when we signed them, didn't we? We did. And we signed. So, this is precisely what we were going into. What's surprising to you?
                      Quote: Level 2 Advisor
                      better to die?

                      We will all die someday. The question is how.
                      I wasn't talking about transferring nuclear weapons to allies, I was specifically talking about our bases in the region. And yes, it is applicable. Our Military Doctrine allows and prescribes this.
                      1. +1
                        3 November 2025 13: 20
                        Quote: bayard
                        What else do nuclear weapons exist for, if not for their use in the event of an attack on your country and your allies?

                        To be fair, the doctrine doesn't say anything about allies... especially since Belarus is an ally, Venezuela is not.
                        Quote: bayard
                        Well, the SVO also called the VVP a "response with military-technical means" to Ukrainian aggression.

                        Well, it's still not quite the same as getting involved in someone else's conflict. In my opinion, you're exaggerating the significance of this agreement... an agreement on military-technical cooperation is not at all the same as an alliance agreement.
                      2. +2
                        3 November 2025 14: 24
                        Quote: Level 2 Advisor
                        Moreover, Belarus is an ally, Venezuela is not.

                        Well, a strategic partner is something too. And the full text of those agreements hasn't been published. Besides, the agreement on deploying our military bases has been in place for 10 years, and today is precisely the deadline for this agreement to enter into force and be implemented.
                        Do you think that this is not our conflict?
                        And for the US, the SVO, is this their conflict?
                        The USA, England and Europe have done us a lot of harm, caused enormous damage, killed our people with their weapons, target designation, the leadership of the Ukrainian Armed Forces in their headquarters. This is direct participation.
                        It's time to pay the bills.
                        Shedding Anglo-Saxon blood on foreign shores is far more practical than on one's own soil. And it is their blood that must be shed. Abundantly. Painfully. Exhaustingly. And shamefully.
                        Quote: Level 2 Advisor
                        it's still not quite the same as joining someone else's conflict,

                        This is a zone of our strategic interests. This is in the interests of our business. And this is a vendetta for the US's participation in the war against us. Everything is legal – based on intergovernmental/interstate agreements and at the request of a strategic partner.
                        What good would a Tsirkon missile system be in the Leningrad Region or Krasnodar Krai? But from the jungles of Venezuela, these remarkable missiles could sink an aggressor's warships in no time, often and very effectively. Many of our other weapons systems can and should be tested. For example, the Kh-59 anti-aircraft missile, with its stated range of 560 km, could, for starters, destroy a newly deployed American radar on a tethered balloon. The aircraft carrier Ford simply must receive its well-deserved Tsirkons. And let this be a warning, as the remaining warheads could prove to be special.
                        It's just like the last Cuban Missile Crisis. This one will be number 2.
                        Or are you a masochist and ready to accept everything they do against us one-sidedly?
                        Do they want to expand the conflict zone?
                        So let's not refuse them.
                        Is Trump now concerned about oil and the fate of local Christians in Nigeria? Our Afrika Korps can also offer assistance in repelling the aggression of the invaders. The conditions are simple and they are known in Africa.
                        Don't be shy about entering into conflict if the conflict is directed at you.
        2. ANB
          0
          4 November 2025 17: 04
          I should try the Zircon on Ford.

          Until the tomahawks are officially handed over, it's too early to call the Zircons. But something similar, with a Spanish or Native American name, would be perfect.
    2. 0
      2 November 2025 09: 32
      hi Every day the topic of the invasion of Venezuela is repeatedly discussed, shading the background of the SVO in Banderasztat and the violation of peace in Gaza.
      This means that the Anglo-Saxons are planning to start a conflict in yet another region, carefully concealing the location.
      Regarding Venezuela, with the warning to the mattress makers from the Russian Foreign Ministry, as well as the cautious statement from Uncle Xi, the scenario that is currently emerging is more of a 12-day war in the Middle East with Iran, with the CIA attempting to exert internal influence in Venezuela.
      Moreover, according to insider information, behind-the-scenes negotiations are underway between the penguins and the AP, as well as interested parties in business circles.
    3. +4
      2 November 2025 10: 09
      Quote: The same LYOKHA
      We need to help Maduro with PR against the US...the enemy of our enemy, our friend.


      It's definitely worth helping, especially given our investments in Venezuela and the friendly regime... but the "expert's" competence is very disconcerting, even this phrase in the text:

      But there are things you don't know. Russia could easily have supplied its overseas partners with a full package – from the Yars and Kinzhal to the Burevestnik and Oreshnik. And the Poseidon is somewhere nearby, patrolling underwater...


      Armen Galustyan, is he certain that Russia unofficially supplied any of the items he listed? If so, where did he get them from? I highly doubt it... it's a guess.

      And since he's such a "specialist," questions arise about his arguments about Venezuelans' hatred of the United States... how confident is he? Couldn't it be that if Maduro and the entire military leadership were eliminated (by targeted strikes), say, tomorrow, Venezuelans would take to the streets to celebrate the lifting of sanctions and a new democracy? In short, I doubt the expert's competence.
      1. +11
        2 November 2025 10: 24
        Venezuelans' hatred of the United States is easily outweighed by their love for the dollar.
        1. +2
          2 November 2025 13: 12
          Quote: Anglorussian
          Venezuelans' hatred of the United States is easily outweighed by their love for the dollar.

          Specifically to the dollar, or to the money? And to its quantity?
          The Americans didn't spoil them with money; there was product sharing, and only the elite were fed. The Bolivarians, however, introduced social programs, organized healthcare, provided education, and began building housing for slum dwellers and resettling the poor. They even tried to buy off the city's hipsters and the local mafia during Guaido's attempted coup. But the multicolored revolution somehow didn't work out. Since then, conclusions have been drawn, and all the vulnerable segments of society have been kept under control. And we remember how Latinos can fight for their independence since the days of Fidel Castro and Che Guevara. Cuba was generally considered a casino and brothel tied to the US; where would the spirit of freedom come from? And Venezuela is a "gangsterland," precisely because of the adrenaline and passion. This means there will be a new Vietnam and a "jungle fire." In the current reality, this will finish off the US. Moreover, China is not at all opposed to organizing such a "hedgehog in the pants" for the US.
          No experience?
          But there are resources.
          And right now, a lot of people are angry at the USA... a lot of people.
          Despite Trump's personal likability for many.

          But to take advantage of the new Cuban Missile Crisis in order to curtail its military presence in Europe, that’s something.
          1. +6
            2 November 2025 13: 27
            They told roughly the same pearls about Hussein's Iraq.
            1. -3
              2 November 2025 13: 42
              At that time, a traitor was sitting in the Kremlin. And Iraq had no external support. It had no ally.
              The use of nuclear weapons against an aggressor's ships is a legitimate response and retaliation. The Kh-59, Kh-69, Kh-31, Onyx, and Zircon are simply superb in their anti-ship and nuclear capabilities.
              Hussein didn't have that.
              1. +5
                2 November 2025 13: 48
                Does Maduro have nuclear weapons and their carriers?
                1. -2
                  2 November 2025 14: 02
                  Well, we are allies - we will help.
                  The aggressor's ships are a legitimate target. And civilians will not be harmed.
                  The US has a lot of ships. After this, there will be fewer.
                  Allies need to be protected. And their nuclear weapons are solely for self-defense. The Tsirkons in containerized launch vehicles will do the trick. And the Kh-59 and Kh-69 have good range and accuracy. The Kh-59 is also hypersonic at the end of its boost phase.
                  1. +1
                    2 November 2025 14: 08
                    After this, nuclear weapons will be immediately deployed by the empire of rising fat against Russian cities with a population of over a million. Or by the Americans themselves—they only draw red lines with the blood of their enemies.
                    1. -2
                      2 November 2025 14: 20
                      Quote: Anglorussian
                      They draw red lines only with the blood of the enemy.

                      Then they will drown in their own red lines and bake into glass.
                      Their coastline is mined, so they have no chance to move.
                      Rubio is fulfilling his role as the curator of the Venezuelan adventure. He will be held accountable in the event of a counter-escalation. If it doesn't lead to complete Armageddon.
                      1. +2
                        2 November 2025 14: 42
                        Do you really believe all this? belay ?
                      2. -3
                        2 November 2025 14: 51
                        Of course .
                        After all, this is a classic World War II scenario, the beginning of which is encouraged and provoked by England. But it is precisely England that is first on the list of targets.
                      3. 0
                        2 November 2025 15: 07
                        Did they read this in Samsonov or did they say it in Constantinople? wassat ?
                      4. -3
                        2 November 2025 15: 49
                        Why should I read about this? Especially in Constantinople? I never go there.
                      5. -1
                        2 November 2025 15: 51
                        Did Rubio himself, after the second bottle, complain to you in tears about his hard lot and irregular working hours? belay ?
                        Did you find maps of the US coastline minefields behind the garage?
                      6. -3
                        2 November 2025 16: 03
                        Quote: Anglorussian
                        Did Rubio himself really complain to you in tears after the second bottle?

                        He didn't even manage to master the first one.
                        Quote: Anglorussian
                        Did you find maps of the US coastline minefields behind the garage?

                        Who keeps the secret documents there?
                  2. +3
                    2 November 2025 16: 13
                    So, Dmitry Anatolyevich was referring to you when he spoke about supplying nuclear warheads to Iran. How many have you sent to Venezuela today?
                    1. -3
                      2 November 2025 17: 48
                      No, DAM has its own suppliers.
                      Quote: Gavrilo Princip
                      How many sets have you sent to Venezuela today?

                      They sent it earlier, today is a day off.
                  3. 0
                    2 November 2025 20: 49
                    The ships will be protected by aircraft with F-35s and scouts—no one will let the Latino planes get close. Besides, they have few planes, and they're not exactly the newest.
                    The Americans are relying on air strikes, which means launching Tomahawks to suppress the few remaining air defenses and attacks on airfields and ships.

                    Here we need to sink the American fleet and apparently we need water drones.
                    1. -2
                      3 November 2025 10: 26
                      Quote: Totor5
                      The ships will be protected by aircraft with F-35s and scouts - no one will allow the Latino planes to approach.

                      And the Geraniums will do the trick. And they'll diligently harass the American group's air defenses, forcing them to expend their SAMs and missiles.
                      Quote: Totor5
                      The Americans are relying on air strikes, which means launching Tomahawks to suppress the few remaining air defenses and attacks on airfields and ships.

                      Who knows what they'll get in return? Maybe Onyxes, maybe Zircons, maybe Kalibrs.
                      Quote: Totor5
                      They have few planes and they are not the freshest.

                      US nuclear weapons have been deployed in Europe. Against us! They say it's to protect Europe. We are within our rights, too. And if an attack is carried out on our allies, our nuclear weapons could be used too. That's what they exist for. And at the very least, they would hit US ships.
                      Quote: Totor5
                      Here we need to sink the American fleet and apparently we need water drones.

                      We already have them, we can try them too.
                      Our allies in the Caribbean region should receive protection from us. Not for free, not at our expense, but if they want and need it, they should take on the maintenance of our forces. Maybe China could use some cash for this.
                      Maduro also requested new aircraft from us. And the anti-aircraft missiles for them. The Kh-69 and Kh-59 air-to-air missiles are very effective, have a sufficient range (over 500 km), and are capable of carrying fairly powerful nuclear warheads. The Kh-59 has a speed of Mach 5+. And I see no reason to refuse to assist our ally, to provide target designation for the weapons supplied/being supplied, and to provide specialized equipment for them.
                      1. +1
                        3 November 2025 22: 47
                        I would prefer to see these hundreds of Geraniums and rockets flying towards Kyiv, but we don’t have an extra Dagger even for Zelibaba.
                      2. -2
                        3 November 2025 23: 26
                        Quote: Totor5
                        I would prefer that these hundreds of Geraniums and rockets fly over Kyiv,

                        I'm not sure that the attack UAVs will be called "Geranium", perhaps their name will be "Shahed", or "Bolivar-1", "Bolivar-2", etc. Let's not forget that Maduro also turned to Iran for help and support.
                        Quote: Totor5
                        but we don't have an extra Dagger even for Zelibaba.

                        He's hiding in a very deep bunker, which can only be penetrated by a medium-yield penetrating nuclear weapon. And then there are the guarantees from the guarantor. Zelensky is now discrediting Ukraine and the very idea of ​​this statehood far more than anyone else could in his place. Ukraine's fate is terrible, but it was the choice of its political leadership and those who own that leadership. The very name "Ukraine" should become a curse and a terror among the people. And no one can handle this better than Zelensky. We need about another year to be fully prepared to wipe out NATO with a single, strong-willed decision. Without fuss, sentimentality, or any remorse. Time is still on our side. Next year, several dozen Oreshnik submarines will be deployed in the European direction, another 2-3 submarines will enter service, a certain number of Burevestnik submarines will be put into service, light Iskander-1000 IRBMs (1300 km with nuclear warheads) will be deployed in sufficient quantities, a sufficient number of new ground-based TPUs for Kalibr and Zircon will be deployed, the number of Su-57s in service by the end of next year will exceed 100 units, and the total number of heavy fighters will increase by 130+ new heavy fighters. The number of tanks and new armored vehicles will increase by several thousand more, our attack UAVs will have total dominance over the battlefield, and the satellite constellation will be replenished with several hundred new communications, monitoring, and targeting satellites (deployment of the Gonets satellite constellation, among others, is beginning). The recently launched nuclear-powered submarine carrier for the Poseidon missiles will enter service. The nuclear-powered cruiser Admiral Nakhimov will return to service, and another new frigate of Project 22350.1 (with 32 cells in four UKSK) will be commissioned. We will become even stronger in this next year, while the collective West will continue to wither and writhe in the throes of its own helplessness. Look at what is happening from this perspective and you will see that there is no need to rush or fuss. It's just that if we quickly finish off the Ukrainian Armed Forces right now and reach the Right Bank, marching toward our former western borders, they'll throw us more Eastern European meat. Everything has to happen in time.
                        When we reach the peak of our form and military power, and the West is maximally weakened and disarmed by supplying the Ukrainian Armed Forces with its arsenals...
                        Only then will it be possible to talk about our MONEY, about their REPARATIONS to us for all the damage caused, about fair borders and the responsibility of their politicians. And this conversation will not be kind. It will be a harshly dictated ultimatum. They would do well to surrender right now. But they won’t do that even then. And so they will simply die.
                        And we will build our own Paradise on Earth. This will be possible without them.
                      3. -2
                        4 November 2025 03: 32
                        What a dream you had! belay Wake up, Donetsk is waiting.
                      4. 0
                        4 November 2025 21: 34
                        Where does he hide? He meets tourists at the train station and walks around Kyiv.
                        What makes you think the West will be exhausted in a war of attrition before us? There's almost a billion people there. Just don't tell me about the Chinese either—they won't even die for us economically.
                    2. +1
                      3 November 2025 11: 01
                      Read the article on "War Zone" dedicated to the Venezuelan Air Force and anti-ship missiles. The authors rate their capabilities quite highly.
                      1. +2
                        3 November 2025 22: 46
                        Nothing helped Syria.
                      2. -2
                        3 November 2025 23: 29
                        Russia helped Syria.
                        And now Syria has called Russia again.
                        Assads come and go, but our interests remain.
                      3. 0
                        4 November 2025 21: 39
                        Of course, the American withdrawal from Afghanistan could be called the greatest, most brilliantly executed operation. But in reality, we're in Syria on a shoestring, and if someone were to want to destroy our forces there, we wouldn't be able to respond.
                      4. -1
                        5 November 2025 09: 59
                        Quote: Totor5
                        we are in Syria

                        Quote: Totor5
                        our group, we will not be able to

                        Young man, on whose behalf are you making faces here?
                        Whose statehood are you attaching yourself to?
                        Quote: Totor5
                        Of course, the American withdrawal from Afghanistan can be called the greatest operation ever carried out.

                        Are you talking about special forces in women's dresses and collaborators clinging to the chassis of cars? About abandoned property and weapons worth tens of billions of dollars? And about Trump's desire to return there again and the Taliban's expressive response?
                        Quote: Totor5
                        In fact, we are in Syria on a bird's rights

                        No. We have firm rights. We were persuaded to stay/return there. Our bases in northern Syria were returned to us, our rights to develop and exploit offshore oil and gas fields were confirmed, as well as a whole host of other preferences. Assads come and go, but interests (our interests) remain.
                        Quote: Totor5
                        If someone has a desire to destroy our group there, we will not be able to respond in any way.

                        We can always answer.
                        And louder than anyone on this planet.
                        And in Syria we will also create our own grain hub for the entire region.
                      5. +1
                        6 November 2025 02: 23
                        The whole world has been watching our responses for four years now. Meanwhile, this winter, Kyiv will still have electricity, warmth, train stations, and music on TV.
                      6. -1
                        6 November 2025 02: 31
                        Quote: Totor5
                        This winter Kyiv will still have light and warmth

                        This is no longer the case, although not entirely.
                        I think everything will be a little harsher and darker.
                        It won't be like before.
                        You still don’t understand why they weren’t in a hurry with you?
                        It's in vain. Many have already understood.
                      7. +1
                        6 November 2025 08: 45
                        Without a full-scale air operation, victory over Ukraine is impossible. Although perhaps the point isn't in victory, but in negotiations and deals.
                      8. -1
                        6 November 2025 09: 51
                        The essence of the conflict is much broader than Ukraine, it is just an annoying tool of the Enemy.
                        Quote: Totor5
                        maybe the point is not in Victory, but in negotiations and deals.

                        The enemy is really looking for a deal - a truce.
                        Russia is resolving its own geostrategic issues of security and sustainable development. Ukraine no longer exists, and no one cares about it. This land is ours, under enemy occupation, but it is ours—Russian land. The timing is not particularly critical; the tasks will be addressed methodically and consistently, as other tasks are addressed. It may be unpleasant, but it's not the only one. It will be resolved simply and quickly as soon as it becomes practical.
                        Europe should be thinking about negotiations and deals, but fortunately they are not thinking about this. Everything is going on as usual.
                2. 0
                  3 November 2025 10: 58
                  Does Israel (South Africa) have nuclear weapons and carriers?
            2. 0
              3 November 2025 10: 57
              Iraq - the hunchback sold out, guts and all, for a pizza ad))) hoping to fry in hell, marked
          2. 0
            3 November 2025 10: 55
            A very interesting description of the situation in general and throughout the country.
    4. +1
      4 November 2025 04: 11
      Russia could easily have supplied its overseas partners with a full package – from the Yars and Kinzhal to the Burevestnik and Oreshnik. And the Poseidon is somewhere nearby, patrolling underwater...
      - an obvious absurdity in an otherwise well-written story with local flavor. And a lot of unnecessary words after the reference to the "Iraqi scenario" of beheadings – the most plausible one if Trump decides to go to war.
  2. +14
    2 November 2025 04: 14
    At a conference where South American leaders and the president of North America met, he took the podium immediately after Biden. He sniffed the air, sucked his fingers, and summed it up: "It smells of sulfur..." (implying that the devil had just been there before him).


    As far as I remember, the phrase "Yesterday, the devil spoke at this podium. And it still smells of sulfur" was uttered by Hugo Chávez, President of Venezuela, on September 20, 2006, in a speech to the UN General Assembly. And it was clearly not intended to refer to Biden.
    1. +1
      2 November 2025 19: 16
      Well, the guy is just a former employee of the community center. He doesn't care who said what.
      ...although... often intelligence officers work in "cultural centers," but this is clearly not the case ))
  3. +13
    2 November 2025 04: 41
    I'm afraid it will end like Latin America. It's not Iraq; they're used to American invasions and have never resisted.
    1. +1
      2 November 2025 04: 59
      Quote from alexoff
      They are used to American invasions and have never offered resistance.

      Oh well smile.
      Remember Cuba, Grenada...how Cuban builders used machine guns to concrete American special forces.
      1. +3
        2 November 2025 18: 47
        Statistically, Cuba is an exceptional country, and judging by the number of American invasions it endured in the early 20th century, these exceptions have specific names and surnames. The same cannot be said of modern Venezuela.
      2. +1
        3 November 2025 11: 03
        It's a pity there weren't enough builders, but the forces they mustered against them were unbelievable.
    2. +10
      2 November 2025 07: 09
      That's exactly it. It will end with Manduro and his family in apartments in Moscow City, Rostov, Sochi, Rublyovka, etc. There is plenty to choose from.
      1. +1
        2 November 2025 19: 18
        In fact, it's a good approach when everyone in the world knows that Russia doesn't abandon its own... even partially "its own", even those who have completely screwed up, like Yanukovych and Assad...
        This means that somewhere, someone will rather rely on Russian reliability and the strength of their word than on American ones, even if the price tag is 10x (money won't be useful in the grave).
  4. +11
    2 November 2025 05: 07
    A military coup in Chile took place on September 11, 1973, when Chilean President Salvador Allende was assassinated and a military junta led by General Augusto Pinochet seized power.
    There were no American ships, let alone troops, in that area.
    Yes, CIA agents and other US intelligence agencies worked there to help the conspirators, but the main force was the army.
  5. +1
    2 November 2025 05: 11
    Unfortunately, Maduro is not Un, and Venezuelans are not North Koreans, and besides, Venezuela is all the way across the ocean. But... We need to help by teaming up with China.
    1. +1
      3 November 2025 00: 38
      Help is certainly needed, but it's important to understand that providing equipment will face delivery difficulties: either by sea or by air, i.e., the need for real control over the equipment and the like.
      The option of creating a cargo terminal (hub) in Cuba is also quite problematic. An 11-hour flight is long and expensive. The sea route—I'm not sure the Navy has its own large-capacity cargo vessels. The only option is to charter vessels from third countries. And stockpiles should have been built up earlier.
      Possibly a PMC, but I'm not sure Moduro needs it now.
      The only option left is diplomatic support, but the value of such actions is questionable.
  6. +6
    2 November 2025 05: 11
    Hmm... Such an "expert" on Venezuelan history can talk a lot. Venezuela was never a Portuguese colony, not at all. Apparently, the "expert" confused it with Brazil. But it doesn't make any difference to him, does it?
    Especially since, during the coup in Chile, CIA "officers" were killed at the hands of Soviet officers. And this despite the fact that CIA employees never held officer ranks.
    1. +1
      2 November 2025 05: 27
      Such an "expert" on Venezuelan history can talk a lot. Venezuela was never a colony of Portugal,

      Actually, the article says something completely different:
      Therefore, the people here have all the charms and shortcomings of the Spanish mentality. Venezuelans, like the Spanish, are very sensitive to matters of honor.
    2. +4
      2 November 2025 07: 30
      There's also the "transfer" of the coup in Chile from 1973 to 1979. Apparently, to paraphrase a well-known phrase, there are no other analysts for us.
      1. +2
        2 November 2025 07: 58
        And CIA "officers" die in a shootout with "our" agents... Is this a hint that the Allende government were agents of the GRU of the USSR Ministry of Defense or the KGB?
    3. +6
      2 November 2025 10: 58
      Quote: Grencer81
      Hmm... Such an "expert" on Venezuelan history can talk a lot.

      Yeah, right... THIS kind of "analytics" doesn't do the site any favors. After:
      Russia could easily have supplied its overseas partners with a full package – from the Yars and Kinzhal to the Burevestnik and Oreshnik. And the Poseidon is somewhere nearby, patrolling underwater...

      I just didn't want to read any further. I'd rather go watch REN-TV. laughing
      1. +2
        2 November 2025 13: 02
        Why bother? Hand over a couple of Russian SSBNs to Venezuela for scrap metal, along with their missiles... laughing
  7. +6
    2 November 2025 05: 21
    Well, they're literally training people for war. Maybe there's a way around it? The brave Venezuelans won't win anyway; maybe they'll get lucky and fight back. Thousands will die, plus there'll be devastation. The outcome is dubious for both sides. Losses are guaranteed. It would be nice, of course, if the Americans got hit between the eyes, but that's just "if."
    1. -2
      2 November 2025 13: 40
      Do you think that if instead of Maduro there is a White House protégé, then there won’t be
      Thousands of people will die + devastation
      It is completely unknown in which case the losses will be greater.
      1. 0
        2 November 2025 13: 43
        You seem to have misunderstood me. I'm not against Maduro, rather I'm for him. I'm against war.
        1. -1
          2 November 2025 13: 46
          I think Venezuela is also against the war. But right now, it has little to do with it. Even if Maduro resigns voluntarily, what will happen next? Civil war?
          1. 0
            2 November 2025 13: 54
            If Maduro is wise, I hope he'll screw off the heads of the rotten opposition and remain in power. There will be bloodshed, but minimally. The government will survive, but with the help of the army and the security services. And we must support them as best we can.
            1. -2
              2 November 2025 14: 06
              I hope so too. As for how we can help, I think it's with SAM and anti-ship missiles for the existing systems. Maybe some intelligence, too. The rest won't be done quickly.
    2. +1
      3 November 2025 11: 06
      There will be devastation in any case - look at what the newly-minted Ig Nobel Prize winner is proposing.
  8. +13
    2 November 2025 05: 26
    It's reminiscent of the calculations of Russian military theorists and analysts about how the Iraqi army would tear the small American expeditionary force to shreds. Before Desert Storm.
  9. +4
    2 November 2025 05: 51
    I turned on my analytical couch the other day, well, after the news came out that Maduro had apparently turned to us, Iran, and China for help... And so the couch and I came to this conclusion:
    1. Iran is no help to Venezuela. For a number of reasons.
    2. We can help. Primarily by supplying MANPADS. SAMs too, but we need them more now. We can transfer people to Venezuela—those who fought in Syria, for example. Not several regiments, but, say, one or two companies. We could probably supply anti-ship missiles, but we won't do that.
    3. China can help, both with weapons and specialists. Whether they'll be willing to help is another matter. Yes, China has its own interests in Venezuela. But they won't enter into a serious confrontation with the US. It's a 50/50 split.
    In general, I don't think the Americans will invade. They won't even attack Venezuela. Trump is a chatterbox, a persuasive one, of course, but still a chatterbox.
    1. +1
      2 November 2025 06: 37
      Quote: Grandfather is an amateur
      We can help. Primarily by supplying MANPADS.

      Well, that's already happened!
      A Russian Il-76 military transport aircraft has arrived in the Venezuelan capital, Caracas. The aircraft belongs to Aviacon Zitotrans, a company that transports military equipment, weapons, and even soldiers to countries allied with Russia. (TASS)
      1. +2
        2 November 2025 07: 19
        Well, that's already happened!
        "A Russian military transport aircraft Il-76 has arrived in the Venezuelan capital, Caracas.
        We don't know what cargo the plane was carrying. I agree it's most likely military. But...
        This could be personnel.
        It goes without saying that we try to help if we are asked. love
    2. 0
      2 November 2025 07: 31
      There was information that Maduro had already deployed a couple of thousand MANPADS throughout the country. what
      1. +1
        2 November 2025 07: 32
        Yes, there was something like that in the news. Maduro himself announced it.
    3. 0
      3 November 2025 11: 09
      Why isn't Iran helping Venezuela? It officially supplied speedboats and short-range anti-ship missiles. We can only guess what's not official. The Venezuelan coast is perfectly suited for short-range anti-ship missile boats. They don't fly far, but they're fast, and landing them would be a very exciting experience.
      1. 0
        3 November 2025 11: 56
        Why isn't Iran helping Venezuela?
        I don't think it's in Iran's interests to supply missiles now. Israel is still creating serious tensions. Iran has no reason to waste its ammunition.
        1. 0
          3 November 2025 12: 03
          Iran can help with things it doesn't really need right now—drones, sea- and shore-based anti-ship missiles. I suspect the Jews won't risk attacking Iran while the US is preoccupied with Venezuela. Who will rescue them if the mattress-makers get stuck in South America?
          1. 0
            3 November 2025 12: 07
            Iran could use drones against Israel. Anti-ship missiles, too. The Americans have plenty of aircraft carriers; they could send one closer to Palestine. However, it's up to the Iranians to decide. I simply wrote down the conclusions of my analytical couch. smile
            1. 0
              3 November 2025 12: 59
              Even if American anti-ship missiles do arrive in the Arabian Sea, they will operate beyond the range of Iranian anti-ship missiles. So, the Persians could transfer a certain number without serious harm. Similarly, with the "Shahed" missiles, we don't know how many are in storage. And the mere knowledge of their presence in Venezuela would make the presence of the mattress-laying ships in Puerto Rico and the US Virgin Islands interesting, and in some places even exciting.
        2. 0
          3 November 2025 12: 30
          Do you think the Jewish fleet will come to the Persian Gulf? The volume of UAV production and the number in Iranian warehouses are unknown. Why not transfer a small portion to Venezuela? They can reach Puerto Rico. And if Chinese satellites "highlight" them live, they could target ships.
          1. -1
            3 November 2025 14: 45
            What does the navy have to do with it? Iran's UAVs worked perfectly well alongside the missiles launched at Israel. Whether or not to transfer anything is up to the Iranians to decide.
  10. 0
    2 November 2025 05: 54
    It's enough to sink the aircraft carrier Gerald Ford.
    He is the basis of the American group.
    The only chance to avenge the cruiser "Moscow".
    Venezuela will survive if the eggs are not scrambled.
    There is no need to talk much - you just need to do everything to win.
    1. +9
      2 November 2025 06: 15
      Enough for what?
      We will be pleased, but Venezuela will return to the Stone Age.
  11. +4
    2 November 2025 09: 14
    Regarding mixed marriages. The decision is based on the Catholic Church's decision. If I remember correctly, the Church conducted research and discovered that Native Americans have souls, meaning local Native Americans were admitted to Church sacraments, including official Church-sanctified marriages.
    1. 0
      2 November 2025 13: 04
      And the Anglican Church declared that Indians were savages on the level of animals. So, the roots of 20th-century Nazism grow there.
      1. 0
        2 November 2025 13: 33
        For a complete picture, it is worth comparing the successes of states from the Anglo-Saxon and Iberian colonies.
        1. 0
          2 November 2025 14: 00
          And very big "successes"?
          1. 0
            2 November 2025 14: 06
            Compare the US with Brazil and Australia with Argentina. Who's doing better?
            1. 0
              2 November 2025 14: 10
              And what else can we compare to what? And how does this justify the germ of Nazism that arose in England? After all, the English even consider the Irish subhuman, not to mention Native Americans and other people of color.
              By the way, they also don’t consider the residents of Russia to be full-fledged people.
              1. -3
                2 November 2025 14: 36


                And if we talk specifically about you, they are clearly not wrong.

                By the way, have you ever even seen a living Englishman?
                1. +2
                  2 November 2025 14: 52
                  So what, I saw them? Moreover, I have two cousins ​​living in London. Since the early 2000s... And in 1985, I ran into them at Belorussky Station, where these piglets lit up a cigarette in the middle of the waiting room and then showed their British passports to a police patrol. Basically, they were young and ill-mannered pigs with Her Majesty's passports.
                  1. -1
                    2 November 2025 15: 10
                    And how is it that your nieces live among such nasty Nazis? belay , go and marry them for a passport?

                    And the staunch Black Hundreds will tell you a lot about the embryo of Nazism when they build a time machine.
                    1. +1
                      2 November 2025 15: 27
                      The embryo of Nazism, this "white man's burden"...
                      The exaltation of the Anglo-Saxon race and its contempt for other "inferior" peoples.
                      Especially when among these peoples there are those who are ready to commit any betrayal, if only the supermen from England would give him glass beads.
                      1. -5
                        2 November 2025 15: 45
                        Read "The White Man's Burden," preferably in the original. You'll immediately start posting less stupid nonsense on forums.
                2. +2
                  2 November 2025 14: 53
                  And if I see him again, should I fall on my knees before him like before a ubermensch?
                  1. -6
                    2 November 2025 15: 13
                    It will be enough not to attribute your fabrications to him Yes .
                    1. +2
                      2 November 2025 15: 31
                      There is no need to attribute anything, the Anglo-Saxons are the founders of Nazism, and England is its ancestral home.
                      1. 0
                        3 November 2025 11: 15
                        As well as eugenics, Darwinism and other cannibalistic theories.
                3. +2
                  2 November 2025 14: 55
                  There have always been plenty of Anglophiles in Russia, but I'm not one of them. Bowing down to someone just because they have a British passport... You'll never get it.
                  1. +2
                    2 November 2025 22: 25
                    This is a bolt cutter who has already been banned here, he lives in Britain and will tear anyone apart for his new homeland, he has repeatedly threatened to bomb Russia with atomic bombs if anyone touches his island, and he also threatened the French, who are wow and with whom he drank laughing
            2. +2
              2 November 2025 22: 23
              Let's compare Brazil with English-speaking Uganda, and Argentina with Nepal and Bangladesh. Those who moved to another continent and founded new states often live quite well, which can't be said of their colonies, unless they discovered oil and have a small population.
              1. -3
                3 November 2025 11: 25
                They have a very specific population there—give them a lithograph, and they'll turn it into a barbecue. Even if you give them everything ready-made, it won't do any good.
                1. +1
                  3 November 2025 17: 57
                  I don't think if I gave you a lithograph, you wouldn't do anything useful with it either; at best, you'd sell it. You're from a country with relatively low technological development, and you're clearly trying to curry favor with the white lords. wink
                  1. -6
                    3 November 2025 18: 37
                    And you, from a super-technological superpower, are writing on a Chinese device. laughing ?
                    1. +2
                      3 November 2025 19: 05
                      So you're from the same country, and you're writing on your device that it was developed by the Chinese—from China or Taiwan. Or did you just move there and immediately learn microelectronics, and all those Latin American riffraff are now dumber than you? lol
                      1. -3
                        3 November 2025 19: 09
                        I do not accuse my opponents of coming from an underdeveloped country (which lives better than the 4th world economy) tongue ), and all the Latin American riffraff are dumber than me, yes.
                      2. -1
                        4 November 2025 04: 51
                        Well, here it is, here it comes and his...
        2. +2
          3 November 2025 11: 13
          Success is determined by how many colonies are sucked dry? Or how many citizens perished in wars for the mother country? Yes, there's no denying that Australia is the best)) How many Aussies perished in the PVA and WWII?
      2. +1
        3 November 2025 11: 11
        The roots of all the cannibalistic theories of the 20th century - fascism, Darwinism, eugenics - come from this vile island.
        1. -4
          3 November 2025 11: 27
          Communism actually did no less harm to the world.
          1. +1
            3 November 2025 19: 07
            How much is that? Let's compare how much the white masters destroyed around the world with how much communism destroyed. Surely you have some numbers? wink
            1. -3
              3 November 2025 19: 11
              Count how many dictators and warlords from Cambodia to Kenya and Colombia have knocked out around the world after hastily reading "Das Kapital."
              1. +1
                3 November 2025 21: 10
                So, you've obviously already done the math; will you write down the number now? And I can count how many the British, Americans, and other Adam Smith enthusiasts have knocked out around the world.
                1. -3
                  3 November 2025 22: 42
                  You can't calculate anything, but can only cite Anglophobic historians, who prefer to live not in their own backwaters, but in England or the USA. And quietly envy the nation that has ensured its states priority on the international stage and its citizens an acceptable standard of living.
                  1. +1
                    4 November 2025 00: 56
                    As far as I understand, there won't be any figures from you?
                    Quote: Anglorussian
                    And quietly envy the nation

                    Have you already considered yourself an Englishman? Where in Bobruisk are you originally from? laughing
                    1. -4
                      4 November 2025 01: 43
                      I didn’t register myself anywhere, although the fact is that I, unlike some tongue The fact that you can live here without restrictions and permits also says something.
                      And from the outside, the pity for the killed bombs is very similar to the envy of the failed Imperials.

                      By the way, give me the numbers of those killed by the Anglo-Saxons. I'll drink some gin for the dead.
                      1. +1
                        4 November 2025 03: 47
                        By the way, let's see the numbers of those killed by the Anglo-Saxons.
                        By the way, you were the one who blurted out the numbers about the number of people killed by communists. Let's hear them quickly, I'll drink to your repose. Or did you blurt that out without thinking?
                        I didn't register myself anywhere.
                        It's clear you didn't write it down, you're just groveling and bowing to the ground because you were given a residence permit in the best country in the world with the most depressing industrial zones in Europe. laughing
                        The fact that you can live here without restrictions and permissions also says something.
                        Internet with a passport already? wink
                        And from the outside, the pity for the killed bombs is very similar to the envy of the failed Imperials.
                        What was all this squealing about those killed by communists? The sadness that they had a hand in the collapse of the empire across a quarter of the world's landmass? laughing
                      2. -2
                        4 November 2025 13: 16
                        I didn't need a residence permit initially—I'm from the Baltics. Your other gems, including the industry (AvtoVAZ) laughing ) - the same nonsense.
                      3. +1
                        8 November 2025 23: 09
                        Quote: Anglorussian
                        I didn’t need a residence permit initially – I’m from the Baltics.

                        Oh, Bolt Cutter, is that you? Greetings! hi All non-citizens (in your case, non-nationals) need a residence permit. They also need a registration stamp in their internal passport and a work permit. laughing
                      4. -2
                        8 November 2025 23: 18
                        There haven't been any British citizens since 1949, apparently. There's also no such thing as an "internal passport"—there's just one passport for everything. "Residence permit" also doesn't exist (proof of address isn't the same thing, after all). During Britain's EU membership, a residence permit wasn't required—EU citizens had equal rights to employment and social benefits. It is now, but I naturalized over 12 years ago. Otherwise, you're right. Yes .
                      5. +1
                        8 November 2025 23: 26
                        Quote: Anglorussian
                        And the rest you are right

                        Well, since I wasn't mistaken, I welcome you again. drinks

                        As for where he is wrong, we have already discussed this topic: if we call registration a place of democratic residence, and an internal passport an ID card of a free homo-sapien, then that is a completely different matter! lol
                      6. -2
                        8 November 2025 23: 31
                        And what, are there places that are undemocratic and totalitarian? laughing accommodation? And you were wrong about literally everything.
                      7. +2
                        8 November 2025 23: 37
                        Quote: Anglorussian
                        And you were wrong about literally everything.

                        Damn! There can't be two Bolt Cutters on the VO!

                        Yes, places are different. Just kidding. Good luck to you, and say hello to Bolt Cutter if you see him somewhere in Piccadilly or Baker Street. hi
                      8. 0
                        4 November 2025 09: 01
                        Quote: Anglorussian
                        And from the outside, the pity for the killed bombs is very similar to the envy of the failed Imperials.


                        Who's to envy? The British? They were the biggest losers of the 20th century. Where is their vaunted empire, "on which the sun never set"? A pitiful remnant remains. Tellingly, Britain has now become a kind of doormat for the former colony, which robbed its former mother country of its status as "leader of the free world."
                      9. -2
                        4 November 2025 13: 31
                        The biggest losers of the 20th century are still the 4th place winners. Yes world economies (there was a 2nd one).
                      10. 0
                        4 November 2025 13: 49
                        The biggest losers are still the British. At the beginning of the 20th century, they had the most extensive empire and were the world's leading economy. The Russian Empire, at best, was sixth or seventh. And what about now?
                        After the collapse of the USSR, we lost a third of our territory and half our population. How much did the British lose? Just think about India's loss.
                        At the beginning of the 20th century, the English were, if not first in terms of standard of living, then certainly in the top three. Where does England stand today? It's not even in the top ten or twenty.
                        England was the "workshop of the world." Now they even buy weapons from their former colony. They can't make a good assault rifle themselves, so they had to call in the guns from Heckler & Koch. The Indians and Chinese, once ostracized by the haughty Brits, now look down on yesterday's imperialists and are angling for the British domestic market.
                        And yes, two other powers are "to blame" for your imperial fiasco - the USA and the USSR, which helped reduce your empire, vaunted by Kipling, to zero.
                      11. The comment was deleted.
                    2. +1
                      4 November 2025 04: 50
                      Yes, it’s not Belarusian Bobruisk, there Ukrainian Zhmerinka is just rushing along.
          2. +2
            4 November 2025 04: 48
            Was it communism that unleashed the two Opium Wars against China? Was it communism that caused the Bengal Famine? Was it communists who unleashed colonial wars from the 16th century onward, beginning with the raids of Her Majesty's pirates?
            1. -4
              4 November 2025 13: 27
              You forgot about the Punic Wars. Yes .
              1. +1
                4 November 2025 17: 44
                I haven't forgotten, but fortunately for the Romans, the British Empire didn't exist yet.
                So how are British kings better than communists?
                The British Crown is the world's biggest drug dealer, and the Chinese haven't forgotten it...
  12. +1
    2 November 2025 09: 32
    Well, Nicolás Maduro has work to do, and we need to help him with it. Maybe the guests will leave empty-handed.
  13. +4
    2 November 2025 09: 59
    I read all the way to the hazelnut tree and Poseidon, probably hovering somewhere nearby.
  14. +3
    2 November 2025 10: 43
    The expert's competence is highly questionable. His knowledge of Venezuela could be found in any travel brochure.
  15. +16
    2 November 2025 10: 46
    Russia could easily have supplied its overseas partners with a full package – from the Yars and Kinzhal to the Burevestnik and Oreshnik. And the Poseidon is somewhere nearby, patrolling underwater...


    Oh my God, what nonsense...

    If the US wants, they'll eliminate Maduro and destroy the main facilities from the air. There's no serious air defense there, no Oreshnik missiles or anything like that...

    Back in 2019, I published the following material on VO:

    Does Venezuela have a chance to resist US armed aggression? (https://topwar.ru/154787-est-li-shans-u-venesujely-protivostojat-vooruzhennoj-agressii-ssha.html)

    But the material itself was written even earlier - in 2009, and sent as a military-technical proposal to the Venezuelan embassy, ​​where, in fact, they most likely wiped their ass with it.

    And now, if the US decides to do so, they will wipe their asses with Venezuela itself, and Vladimir Vladimirovich will have another president/dictator – a loser – in his collection.
    1. +1
      2 November 2025 12: 02
      And now, if the US decides, they will wipe their ass with Venezuela itself

      Why be so categorical? Everything flows, everything changes.
    2. +1
      2 November 2025 13: 55
      Quote: AVM
      Russia could easily have supplied its overseas partners with a full package – from the Yars and Kinzhal to the Burevestnik and Oreshnik. And the Poseidon is somewhere nearby, patrolling underwater...


      Oh my God, what nonsense...

      If the US wants, they'll eliminate Maduro and destroy the main facilities from the air. There's no serious air defense there, no Oreshnik missiles or anything like that...

      Back in 2019, I published the following material on VO:

      Does Venezuela have a chance to resist US armed aggression? (https://topwar.ru/154787-est-li-shans-u-venesujely-protivostojat-vooruzhennoj-agressii-ssha.html)

      But the material itself was written even earlier - in 2009, and sent as a military-technical proposal to the Venezuelan embassy, ​​where, in fact, they most likely wiped their ass with it.

      And now, if the US decides to do so, they will wipe their asses with Venezuela itself, and Vladimir Vladimirovich will have another president/dictator – a loser – in his collection.

      It would be good if you published a fresh article on Venezuela on VO. good
    3. +6
      2 November 2025 14: 12
      The article's "expert" is god-level. His "analytics" are "unrivaled." Analytical expert - write more. Yes
      1. +4
        2 November 2025 19: 22
        Come on, with that level of expertise, he could easily become a Russian "war blogger," rack up a couple million subscribers, sell "LGBT fincas," lecture the Ministry of Defense on how to fight, and perform for the Young Pioneers.
  16. +5
    2 November 2025 10: 57
    Do all ships look the same to the Military Intelligence Service? Otherwise, it's hard to explain the appearance of the Norwegian frigate Thor Heyerdahl at the head of the American invasion force in Venezuela.
  17. Fat
    +5
    2 November 2025 11: 02
    It's always interesting to read "analysis" from experts with a view to the future. I've loved science fiction, and not just science fiction, since my youth. smile
  18. +5
    2 November 2025 11: 27
    … The probability is fifty-fifty for now...
    That's the whole point of this "expert's" chatter—like that joke about the likelihood of encountering a dinosaur on the streets of a modern city. And, for the author/interviewer's information: employees of cultural centers abroad are not diplomatic personnel, as this "expert" presents them. I was on the staff of such a center myself, so I know.
  19. +8
    2 November 2025 11: 36
    A wild collection of all sorts of nonsense :((
    The author has come up with some mythical "CIA officers" that don't exist in nature.
    The American aircraft carrier has been hanging around the coast of Venezuela for a month.

    The author, Gerald Ford, only received orders on October 25th to move from the Mediterranean to the Caribbean.
    The Anglo-Saxons also had half-breeds. But they were immediately cast as outcasts and called "bastards."

    Yeah, outcasts. Edith Wilson, wife of the 28th US President Woodrow Wilson, Nancy Reagan, wife of the 40th US President Ronald Reagan, eminent astronomer and mathematician Percival Lowell, actor Edward Norton, actor and singer Glenn Strange, and many other noble Virginia families are descendants of the Indian woman Pocahontas and settler John Rolfe.
    1. -1
      3 November 2025 11: 17
      As of November 2, he was still in the Mediterranean. He's in no hurry to go to war, is he?
      1. 0
        3 November 2025 13: 02
        VO wrote that Trump ordered the catapults to be replaced with steam ones, which is why there is a delay.
        1. 0
          3 November 2025 13: 40
          Well, regarding the catapults and the hoists, it's a complicated matter. Either Donny, as always, blurted out something out of place and without thinking, or there really are some technical issues. The Ford was in trial operation for about three years; of course, the ship is new and packed with all sorts of know-how, but three years seems a bit too long. Then again, if they decide to completely rebuild it, it won't take a month or even six months. So, the Ford will go to Venezuela (if it goes), in its current form. The rework will begin on those that are being completed. And then we'll see, maybe Donny will let it go))) although it's better not to – let him finish off what's left of the mattress fleet.
          1. 0
            3 November 2025 13: 56
            I was just kidding about the catapults. I think Trump would rather switch to something else than have them redesigned.
            1. 0
              3 November 2025 15: 25
              That's if Donn screwed up again, but if it's a technical issue, they'll have no choice. Incidentally, the Fort Laudersdale cruiser left Mayport yesterday and headed for Venezuela. Although, the Ford is still a long way off, a week, maybe a week and a half, if it even gets there.
  20. +3
    2 November 2025 11: 43
    Quote: Thick
    It's always interesting to read "analysis" from experts with a view to the future. I've loved science fiction, and not just science fiction, since my youth. smile


    It's a pity there's no way to give ten stars instead of one.
  21. +1
    2 November 2025 11: 49
    Venezuela is a country with essential resources for the United States. It is on the list of strategic interests, just as Kuwait, Iraq, Syria, and others were. Therefore, behind the outwardly stated reasons, such as the presence of nuclear and chemical weapons belonging to drug cartels, lie the true reasons. BUT, all this also suggests a looming, more serious global crisis of strategic resource shortages and a lack of energy production technologies in various sectors. And the United States should hardly be blamed for this – it is acting in accordance with its status, capabilities, and interests, just as anyone else would.
  22. +1
    2 November 2025 11: 52
    To assess the likelihood of a US "invasion or strike" against Venezuela, it is enough to link several events into one chain.
    1. Test of Vanguard and Poseidon.
    2. Introduction of sanctions against Rosneft and Lukoil.
    3. Trump's hysteria about the supply of Tomahawks to Ukraine.
    4. Maduro's request for the supply of modern weapons.

    All these events are linked in a single chain. Trump needs Venezuelan oil. Rosneft and Lukoil are actively producing oil in Venezuela. To protect their assets in that country, they likely deployed modern weapons and personnel, which make even the idea of ​​seizing these assets extremely expensive. That's why Trump went into hysterics. First, he threatened to deploy "Axes" to Ukraine, then began amassing his fleet off the coast of Caracas. And to top it all off, to make things look decent, Maduro asked for... what's already deployed there. Now, if Trump decides to resort to aggression, and this can only involve long-range strikes, quite modern missiles will be fired in the opposite direction. And to inflict serious damage on Trump's reputation, it's not necessary to fire all the ammunition; sinking one or two ships is enough. In this case, it's safe to say that no one fears the US, and it could be called a paper tiger (to use Trump's own terminology).
    So what are the chances that Trump will attack? It would be advantageous for Russia to use Maduro as a proxy and launch a retaliatory attack on the United States for his actions in Ukraine. This would benefit Maduro, as he would remain in power and his authority in Latin America would greatly increase. But it would be completely disadvantageous for Trump, as no one would guarantee that his plan would be implemented.
    1. +1
      2 November 2025 13: 07
      And now Trump is going to Nigeria to defend Christians.
      1. +1
        3 November 2025 11: 18
        Because there is a lot of oil there))) in other countries - Christians don't bother him)))
        1. 0
          4 November 2025 04: 53
          There is no oil in Sudan, but there are Christians who are being slaughtered... But there is no oil there and Trump will not come to their defense.
  23. +4
    2 November 2025 11: 55
    To be fair, it was Hugo Chavez who made the "smell of sulfur" statement right there in New York after Bush Jr.'s speech, not Maduro after Biden's.
    1. 0
      3 November 2025 11: 20
      Does this change anything at all? Two of a kind, only the first one could even utter a few coherent words. And the second one is completely senile, although this is nothing new for the US. Reagan, by the end of his second term, was also already out of his mind.
  24. -1
    2 November 2025 12: 42
    Quote: bayard
    Quote: The same LYOKHA
    We need to help Maduro with PR against the US.

    If military-technical assistance and intelligence support are already underway, they'll help with PR and suggest aphorisms. But for now, Maduro has tried not to taunt Trump, not to provoke him, not to give him a reason. After all, it's better to be than to seem.
    But if we manage to sink the Ford... Latin America will tear up all the accordions and button accordions in celebration.

    Absolutely right. This is the only right decision for all time, at least until the end of the century. In the past, only the Japanese drowned them; this time, they must drown them with what they brought from Russia, and shut the Red-Headed Chatterbox's mouth forever! Only this way, not by showing cartoons and vague videos. Here, and now, this is how the actions of the head of state are assessed! If he doesn't do it, then his opponent will, or, to put it simply, his enemy! From this perspective, this perspective, as the father of the gap-toothed son with the funny last name, Raikin, used to say!
    Gorbachev, let's be honest, had such a pseudonym among us. wassat
  25. +3
    2 November 2025 12: 45
    How will the invasion of Venezuela end?

    High crime rates coupled with corruption will begin to consume the country.
    In short, there will be complete collapse.
  26. 0
    2 November 2025 13: 04
    Quote: Maluck
    To assess the likelihood of a US "invasion or strike" against Venezuela, it is enough to link several events into one chain.
    1. Test of Vanguard and Poseidon.
    2. Introduction of sanctions against Rosneft and Lukoil.
    3. Trump's hysteria about the supply of Tomahawks to Ukraine.
    4. Maduro's request for the supply of modern weapons.

    All these events are linked in a single chain. Trump needs Venezuelan oil. Rosneft and Lukoil are actively producing oil in Venezuela. To protect their assets in that country, they likely deployed modern weapons and personnel, which make even the idea of ​​seizing these assets extremely expensive. That's why Trump went into hysterics. First, he threatened to deploy "Axes" to Ukraine, then began amassing his fleet off the coast of Caracas. And to top it all off, to make things look decent, Maduro asked for... what's already deployed there. Now, if Trump decides to resort to aggression, and this can only involve long-range strikes, quite modern missiles will be fired in the opposite direction. And to inflict serious damage on Trump's reputation, it's not necessary to fire all the ammunition; sinking one or two ships is enough. In this case, it's safe to say that no one fears the US, and it could be called a paper tiger (to use Trump's own terminology).
    So what are the chances that Trump will attack? It would be advantageous for Russia to use Maduro as a proxy and launch a retaliatory attack on the United States for his actions in Ukraine. This would benefit Maduro, as he would remain in power and his authority in Latin America would greatly increase. But it would be completely disadvantageous for Trump, as no one would guarantee that his plan would be implemented.

    With a few adjustments and additions, which I won't make, I generally agree with you. Maduro's main goal if Redhead starts is to sink an aircraft carrier, and a couple of landing craft for good measure. That's all. He'll be a hero for all time in Latin America, and the rest of America, while we're kind of in the shadows. But! There's a problem. The man leading the Russian Federation is neither Brezhnev nor even Khrushchev, much less Stalin. Although in some moments and episodes he tries to achieve his glory. So, alas, it won't work. I feel sorry for the guys, that's what I want to say. And to this one, I want to say: either fight, or... kiss the ace, as Redhead suggested to all of Gayrope. sad
    1. 0
      2 November 2025 13: 19
      Time will tell. Perhaps there won't be any need to feel sorry for anyone if Trump, as usual, turns his attention to Niger.
      1. 0
        3 November 2025 11: 21
        Nigeria and Niger are different countries, although they are located next to each other.
  27. -1
    2 November 2025 14: 15
    There's a strong belief that US aggression in Venezuela is being artificially delayed due to Trump's lack of confidence in its success. There's also speculation that, should the Venezuelan venture fail, "deep" London will attempt to "put Donald Fredovich in his place" or "take him down" politically. And Secretary of State Marco Rubio is subtly, cunningly, and very cautiously playing this tactic, as the "first violin" in the "deep" London "ensemble" in the White House. And Niger is a "smokescreen" in Trump's "heap" of unfulfilled goals.... Although...
  28. +2
    2 November 2025 15: 10
    The coup in Chile was in 1973...
  29. +1
    2 November 2025 15: 56
    The American aircraft carrier has been hanging around the coast of Venezuela for a month now. To no avail.


    Well, first of all, it’s not even a month, but there’s already some benefit.
    It may not have caused great fear, but it certainly made me twitch.
    Maduro requested military-technical assistance. That's already a plus for the Yankees.
    In their own media, according to the author of the article, it is somehow sluggish and unconvincing
    He's fighting back, which doesn't add to the optimism of his supporters. Second plus.
    If the boss is twitching, then the generals may also have unpleasant thoughts.
    If he starts to pull the army here and there, the coastline will bristle,
    will deploy machine guns, missiles, etc., having discovered its deployment -
    He'll give you a gift. That's probably all the Americans are waiting for. They'll copy the positions.
    They'll hit in no time. The army will falter – Maduro is finished.
    The Yankees had just arrived - the opposition's spirit immediately perked up, another plus.
    A couple of boats were destroyed with fishermen (or non-fishermen) on board - no one even uttered a peep.
    No UN or human rights activists are indignant, that’s another plus.
    The fight against drug dealers is a sacred cause.
    So even such a parking lot is useful.
    Calmly, on the spot, in close proximity, they study
    situation, planning an operation.
    Maduro now needs to maintain the information field in the media and conserve his strength,
    which will make it possible to prevent ships from landing troops.
    Good luck to him in this difficult task...
    1. +1
      3 November 2025 11: 23
      Where's the aircraft carrier coming from? The Iwo Jima is a light attack craft with a standard load of 12 Harrier launch vehicles to support the landing force.
  30. +6
    2 November 2025 17: 13
    Russia could easily have supplied its overseas partners with a full package – from the Yars and Kinzhal to the Burevestnik and Oreshnik. And the Poseidon is somewhere nearby, patrolling underwater...
    What an EXPERT, what a son of a bitch!!!
  31. -6
    2 November 2025 17: 35
    How will the invasion of Venezuela end?

    For pin dos niks there is nothing good. request
    If even one "axe" hits Russia, most will sink near Venezuela. Yes
    They said "at the top": the Iranian scenario and "guys in slippers" are being considered.
    Pin-dosniks will directly control the "axes," directing them toward Russian cities, while we, unfortunately, will only be directed toward their troughs.
    In general, the war will reveal the plan. what
    1. +2
      2 November 2025 19: 50
      K-50: "If at least one "axe" flies at Russia, then most of them will drown near Venezuela...." Dear K-50, promising to marry does not mean getting married.... For this to happen (as you broadcast on the "air"), in addition to words, impressive actions are needed in life that will "reach" the remnants of the "gray matter" of the Western brain and political will, which, for some reason, we have not succeeded with... We are increasingly talking about exhortations, negotiation processes, summits, forums, drawing "red lines", at the "worst end" - stories about our scientific and technical coolness and absolute uniqueness in the world... "Abroad", they have practically stopped reacting to all this, even at the level of an unconditional reflex, with the addition of the word "in fact"... It already makes sense to think about "your beloved selves"... There will be impressive victories on On the fronts, the so-called North Atlantic Treaty Organization, Venezuela, Iran, and Nigeria, along with Trump, will become obsolete, and Europe will "turn on" its brains...
  32. +4
    2 November 2025 18: 24
    Armen Galstyan, an employee of the Russian House
    Analbeks, dildos, and other mahmuds are the face of the Russian world.
    National Unity Day – plov festivals across the country and worship of Uzbek-Tajiks
    Maybe we should first sort things out in our own country, and then rush overseas and support some unclear figure?
    1. +1
      6 November 2025 14: 04
      Quote: Ivan_1234
      National Unity Day – plov festivals across the country and worship of Uzbek-Tajiks

      How can we not understand that this holiday is not between nations, it is an invented holiday of unity between the rich and the poor
  33. +5
    2 November 2025 19: 12
    It's funny when a former worker in the humanities and cultural sphere starts talking about military strategy.
  34. 0
    2 November 2025 22: 09
    The expert's qualifications are questionable, although some of his statements are sensible. I recall interviews with some of the late General Rokhlin's "comrades." They spouted such nonsense that it was hard to believe the general could rely on such people.
  35. DO
    0
    3 November 2025 00: 05
    It's highly likely that US Marines will take control of Guyana within the next two to three years. Then, for several years, they will continue to move westward from Guyana and the sea into Venezuela, though unlikely to extend much further than approximately the Guri Reservoir. But this won't be permanent; there will certainly be years of reverse movement of the LBS.
    In short, a war between the Americans and Venezuela is likely to happen, as the age of wars has begun on Earth. This war will predictably be long, and ultimately unlikely to be successful for the United States.
  36. +4
    3 November 2025 01: 19
    Not a bad review, inspiring)))
  37. +1
    3 November 2025 17: 51
    More wet dreams. Where and how they bought generals in Iraq is a rhetorical question; they were probably bribed back in 1991. And laughing at the fact that the US has been dawdling off the coast of Venezuela for over a month is silly. They'll lay the groundwork, assemble the necessary forces, conduct thorough reconnaissance, and carry out a proper operation. China will sit quietly on the sidelines; relying on its help is foolish. The Chinese leadership wants an attack, preferably one with the same effect as Vietnam, or at least to prolong the operation as long as possible.
  38. +1
    3 November 2025 19: 51
    What Yars?! What Burevestnik with Poseidon?! What is he talking about? What is he smoking?!
  39. +1
    3 November 2025 20: 25
    The Venezuelan armed forces number one and a half million people.

    This should be put in the epigraph so that one could immediately evaluate the quality of the expert and not waste time reading it.
  40. -1
    4 November 2025 08: 50
    Quote: TOS-NN
    Well, first of all, it’s not even a month, but there’s already some benefit.


    Against the backdrop of the US budget crisis, such fussing is clearly a major disadvantage for Trump. The electorate is not very supportive of another war amid obvious domestic problems. And if a military operation doesn't take place, Trump will again look like a show-off and a windbag, just as he did when he tried to bully North Korea.
  41. 0
    4 November 2025 08: 53
    Quote: Arkee
    Where and how did they buy generals in Iraq is a rhetorical question, apparently they were bribed back in 1991


    If the generals had been bribed in 1991, there would have been an American garrison in Baghdad by the end of that year. No, it took approximately 12 years of sanctions to exhaust Iraq, depriving it of any chance of successful resistance. The US, like the global hyena, prefers to attack weakened and exhausted individuals.
  42. -1
    4 November 2025 23: 17
    In fact, Pinochet carried out the coup in Chile not in 1979, but in 1973.
    In September.
    And the KGB missed this coup because the entire KGB staff and leadership were at that time in the Moscow region harvesting potatoes.
    And why there was a shootout 6 years later in 1979 is not clear.
    Are these Estonians KGB agents or even, God forgive me, Finns?
  43. 0
    5 November 2025 15: 26
    Ambush a couple, three Bastions! Even if two are destroyed, the remaining one will reach the carrier! That would be a resounding fall in every sense of the word!
  44. +2
    6 November 2025 13: 29
    Quote: Anglorussian
    It's reminiscent of the calculations of Russian military theorists and analysts about how the Iraqi army would tear the small American expeditionary force to shreds. Before Desert Storm.

    In the summer of 1990, Iraq could have done just that, and the Saudis could have followed Kuwait's fate. But Saddam wanted to negotiate with the US, and everyone knows the outcome. The illusion that he could negotiate with the US backfired.
    By the beginning of 1991 it was already too late - the American expeditionary force had already included everything that was supposed to oppose the Warsaw Pact in Europe.
  45. +1
    6 November 2025 13: 35
    Quote: Anglorussian
    Venezuelans' hatred of the United States is easily outweighed by their love for the dollar.

    Why do you believe the US is handing out dollars to its victims? Quite the contrary: the US doesn't attack its victims to enrich them, but only to rob them.
    Not only do they not give dollars, but they only take them from others.
  46. +1
    6 November 2025 13: 46
    Quote: Anglorussian
    After this, nuclear weapons will be immediately deployed by the empire of rising fat against Russian cities with a population of over a million. Or by the Americans themselves—they only draw red lines with the blood of their enemies.

    I deeply doubt the US and the West will take the nuclear escalation route. A quick look at the world's known stockpiles of enriched uranium and plutonium will easily reveal that Russia currently possesses approximately ten times more nuclear warhead material than the entire West, led by the US.
    A nuclear exchange in the next few years will also be 10 to 1 in Russia's favor. And if the independent states make the catastrophic mistake of intervening in a nuclear showdown, Ukraine will suffer a true holocaust, the likes of which have never been seen in world history.
  47. +2
    6 November 2025 13: 55
    Quote: iomoe
    I read all the way to the hazelnut tree and Poseidon, probably hovering somewhere nearby.

    As everyone knows, Venezuela doesn't need any Oreshniks or Poseidons. Yemeni shahedi, ballistics, and beks are quite sufficient. Let me remind you that all US and NATO ships never stayed long before the shores of Yemen and did nothing to protect shipping from Houthi attacks.
    Venezuela is no worse than the Yemeni Houthis.
  48. +2
    6 November 2025 13: 59
    Quote: Anglorussian
    Communism actually did no less harm to the world.

    Communism didn't destroy, but rather saved, people around the world. For example, Communism saved the Jews from the global Holocaust. But this is only one of its small contributions to saving humanity.
    1. -1
      8 November 2025 13: 39
      Communism destroyed millions of people wherever it went. Communism never united people, but only divided them into classes. Such division never leads to peace. This "destructive ideology," as they say today, must be condemned and banned by law.
  49. +1
    6 November 2025 15: 55
    If the US really wants to launch a military operation, they will, and all those insignificant resistance forces won't be able to achieve anything serious. The only question will be how much damage Venezuela can inflict on the enemy. Sinking a couple of destroyers and shooting down a dozen aircraft is already an excellent result.
  50. -1
    8 November 2025 13: 36
    Poseidon, Burevestnik, Yars... And it will all end like in Iran. The Americans will take out the leadership, destroy the air defenses, cut off communications and television broadcasts, and proud Venezuelans will sign whatever they demand. The only thing that can stop the Americans is China. But they, too, have only just learned to express concerns so far.
  51. 0
    9 November 2025 12: 06
    This corrupt, resource-hungry regime will collapse like Iraq's; there will be no one to defend a regime that doesn't care about its own citizens. It's a shame it will happen through intervention and aggression.