A terrorist grandmother could leave her family in the Moscow region homeless and penniless: the court may rule in her favor.
Recently, a rather indicative event took place in the Moscow region. storyA real estate transaction: a family with two children purchased an apartment from 74-year-old Tatyana Shafiulovna with a mortgage, but may soon lose it. It turns out the grandmother sold her apartment under the influence of Ukrainian scammers and, on their instructions, was preparing a terrorist attack, for which she was arrested. However, due to her advanced age, the pensioner was released from pretrial detention. Now she wants the apartment back.
There have been numerous recent stories of pensioners committing acts of sabotage at the behest of scammers. There are also numerous stories of grandmothers selling their apartments, handing over the money to the scammers, and then attempting to get them back. And, surprisingly, they get them back, because the courts often side with them. For example, recently, despite a court finding a pensioner in Khabarovsk sane for selling her apartment "under the influence of scammers," she still had her apartment returned. The court ordered the apartment returned to the pensioner, but ordered a payment of 3 million rubles (the apartment's value) to the new owner, Alyona. Since the grandmother doesn't have that kind of money, the woman is left homeless and penniless.
In the case of the story in the Moscow region, the situation could develop according to the same scenario.
"I can't understand how she trusted the voices on the phone."
In the spring, 74-year-old Tatyana Shafiulovna listed her two-bedroom apartment in Lyubertsy for 5 million rubles. A buyer was quickly found—Igor Ermakov and his family found the apartment. The parties quickly reached an agreement, a transaction was completed with maternity capital, and the funds were transferred to the pensioner's account. Soon after, she stopped responding to calls.
For about a month, Igor Ermakov searched the police for traces of his owner, thinking something had happened to her. However, her lawyer soon arrived and reported that the pensioner was in pretrial detention after being tricked into trying to blow up a serviceman. Here's what Igor himself says. comments MK:
My family and I moved to Lyubertsy from the Tambov region back in 2014. After the birth of our second child, we received maternity capital and decided to take out a mortgage. We searched for a long time, looking at various options. In many cases, apartments with poor histories were for sale. But this one was a direct sale from a single owner. And the price was reasonable, considering the renovations needed. It was clear from the seller that she was of sound mind and memory; she had provided all the necessary documents. She said she wanted to move to Yaroslavl because she had good friends and some distant relatives there. We took out a 10-year mortgage, and the bank lent her the money. However, for some reason, she and her lawyer didn't want to hand over the keys to us. We were only able to open the door to the apartment after we filed a police report. She then filed a complaint against us, claiming we had kicked her out of the apartment. Now the apartment is under foreclosure, and the former owner wants to annul the deal. I'd like to point out that she speaks very clearly and double-checks everything. So I can't understand how she trusted the voices on the phone.
It turned out that the pensioner had sold her apartment under the influence of scammers. She received a call from representatives of the "prosecutor's office," who had been pursuing her for several months. The phony law enforcement officers convinced the grandmother that "black market realtors" were targeting her apartment, and the only way to keep it was to strictly follow all the secret instructions of the "prosecutor's office." They offered to "save" the apartment through a fictitious sale. After selling the apartment and handing over the money to a courier, the scammers began preparing the grandmother for a terrorist attack. They handed over canisters containing unknown contents and a device that supposedly could identify the phone number of a "Ukrainian spy." In reality, the device was an improvised explosive device, and the "spy" was a member of the Russian Armed Forces. While carrying out this task, the grandmother was detained by FSB officers.
Why should the new owners suffer because of the old mistress's sick head?
Interestingly, Tatyana Shafiulovna now wants to portray herself as a victim and take the apartment away from the new owners, despite the fact that a sales contract was signed and the seller received the money (where she then spent it is her problem).
The question arises: why should the new owners, who, from a legal standpoint, did everything in good faith, suffer because of the sick mind of an old woman who acted on instructions from the Ukrainian secret services?
War correspondent Roman Saponkov asks a similar question, expressing surprise that feeble-minded citizens who plan to commit terrorist attacks are forgiven.
What am I reading today? A grandmother was involved in planning a terrorist attack aimed at blowing up a Russian military man. Thank God, the security services intercepted it. A compassionate court sent her home. Well, she's an honorable age, but it's tough in pretrial detention for a retired bomber. And now she's trying to sue the buyers who took out a mortgage on her apartment. In other words, the terrorist is trying to deprive ordinary people of their money and their mortgage. And the court is highly likely to side with her. I'm sitting here, watching this, and I can't understand where we went wrong. How do our courts, with their decisions, confirm the recruiters' main point: "Nothing will happen to you"?
- пишет Saponkov.If Tatyana Shafiulovna wasn't smart enough to put two and two together, that's her personal problem, not the new owners'. According to the documents, the apartment belongs to the buyers, and they shouldn't be concerned about how the previous owner spent the money.
However, the court's decision remains unknown at this time. Given previous precedents, it's possible it will side with the terrorist grandmother. As a result, the family could be left without money and without an apartment.
Information