Predatory "birds" of Ukrainian ultralight aviation

21 220 48
Predatory "birds" of Ukrainian ultralight aviation


Necessary foreword


It's no secret that less than four years of special military operations have clearly demonstrated that in today's war, UAVs are at the forefront of weapons capable of inflicting significant, sustained damage on the enemy while minimizing one's own losses.



In March of this year, the Military Medical Journal published the results of a statistical study: 75% of the losses of our military personnel were the result of the work of unmanned aerial vehicles. aviation the adversary.

But, besides the defeat of manpower, Drones They destroy army equipment and vehicles and destroy fortifications.

Today, both opposing sides use dozens of different types of drones directly on the line of contact and at a distance of up to 50 kilometers from it.

At the same time, both Russia and Ukraine are constantly increasing the number and effectiveness of strikes deep into enemy territory.

Both sides do not hide the goals of such actions and are improving the means of defeating these targets.

Due to a certain "deficit" missiles with a range of more than 300-500 kilometers and, despite the Ukrainian propaganda machine's claims of allegedly producing "several thousand" long-range heavy drones per month, the Ukrainians clearly cannot reach the quantitative and qualitative level of missile weapons and long-range unmanned aircraft of the Russian Federation.

At the same time, it must be acknowledged that, having identified certain weak points in the air defense of cities and strategically important facilities in the once deep rear of Russia, the Ukrainians have succeeded in repeatedly launching, at first one-off, and now regular and quite painful attacks on industrial enterprises, oil refineries, transportation facilities, oil and gas networks, as well as directly on residential areas of Russian cities.

Just a few days ago, on the night of October 30-31, Ukrainian drones launched another massive attack on targets in the Vladimir, Yaroslavl, Oryol, Voronezh, Belgorod, Tambov, Tula, Bryansk, Volgograd, Kaluga, Ryazan, and Moscow regions.

And while officials, burdened with the right to make specific decisions, together with the military, wearing very large stars on their shoulder straps, thought for a long time and wondered how to fight this scourge, and finally came to the decision to create mobile fire groups (MOG), special forces from reservists, together with the use of EWBy disabling GPS and the internet, using passive defenses, etc., the enemy has calmly and quite successfully inflicted and, unfortunately, continues to inflict very painful blows on deep Russian territory.

Incidentally, even in the first months of the Second World War, users of various websites, and even Russian television, were having a field day laughing at the creation of mobile fire groups (MOGs) in Ukraine. They were supposedly planning to shoot down Geran missiles with Maxim and Degtyar missiles from the Great Patriotic War.

Today no one laughs anymore...

But we are not talking about the means and organization of defense, but about another type of weapon that an enterprising enemy, with the direct support of “friends of Ukraine,” has used and continues to use to this day.

And this type of weapon is called airplanes.

No, these are neither F-16s with Mirages, nor Sukhois with MiGs, which still remain in the enemy air force.

These tiny little planes, ultra-light "bugs," with a takeoff weight of up to 495 kilograms, have been converted into drones with an electronics unit that allows them to "quickly, quickly, quickly" carry several dozen, or even hundreds, of kilograms of explosives a couple of thousand kilometers deep into Russia, where they are practically unwelcome, and, as it turns out, there is nothing to shoot them down with, and no one to shoot them down there.

Information about the first use of such a "bug" in the skies over Tatarstan can be found in open sources.

Aeroprakt A-22 Foxbat


On April 2, 2024, Ukraine, using two of its own A-22 Foxbat ultralight aircraft converted into unmanned aerial vehicles, attempted to strike a highly desirable target in the Alabuga industrial zone near the city of Yelabuga.


The Ukrainians turned this "misfortune" into a kamikaze drone. The Aeroprakt A-22 Foxbat. It has an Austrian Rotax 912 engine (70-100 hp). Takeoff weight is 450 kg. Average speed is 130 km/h, and with an additional fuel tank, it can fly 1200 km. Reports indicate that about 1000 units have been assembled in Ukraine since 1999.

They missed the factory, but the drone struck a student dormitory near the production complex, injuring 13 people. The estimated distance from the launch site was approximately 1200 kilometers. Given the distance and the aircraft's performance, it could have been loaded with approximately 100 kilograms of explosives.


An A-22 Foxbat in Tatarstan a second before hitting a dormitory.

If you dig around thoroughly on the internet, you can, unfortunately, find more than one case of the successful use of this "cuttlefish" with the name Foxbat, like the MiG-25, against targets in Russia.

For example, on December 15, 2024, a strike was carried out on a facility in Grozny, and on April 14, 2025, an identical unit flew into a residential building in Rostov-on-Don.

YouTube channel "Techno Thunder" reports:

The conversion of the Aeroprakt A-22 Foxbat into a long-range unmanned combat aerial vehicle (UCAV) is a revolutionary development in modern warfare.

Ukrainian forces have converted this civilian aircraft, originally designed for sport aviation, into a powerful strategic strike vehicle deep within enemy territory. With increased fuel capacity, improved control systems, and the ability to carry explosive payloads, the A-22 Foxbat-based UCAV now poses a significant threat to critical infrastructure.


A diagram of the Aeroprakt A-22 Foxbat-based long-range unmanned strike system, as presented by Global Defense News.

The drone is equipped with equipment that ensures high-precision GPS and inertial navigation systems, enabling precise targeting even in the face of electronic countermeasures.

Encrypted communications systems allow for data transfer and real-time adjustments, increasing the chances of mission success. Depending on its range, it can carry between 50 and 200 kg of explosives. It's worth noting that the A-22 is readily available in the US, France, the UK, Germany, and even Australia. It can be purchased as a complete unit or as a kit for subsequent assembly.

This very simple airplane was created by a designer with the "typical" Ukrainian name of Yuri Yakovlev. Reports suggest that this aircraft, known as "Sharik," is still flying in Russia.

SkyRanger


The aircraft, designed in the 1990s by French designer Philippe Prévot and offered as a kit, is sold by Best Off.

Incidentally, its main components are manufactured by the Kyiv-based company AEROS. In total, the French company has produced around 1200 sets of this construction set.


SkyRanger. Takeoff weight 450-473 kg, cruising speed 140 km/h, range about 500 km. Rotax 912 UL engine, 80-100 hp.

Ukrainian news The Babel portal reported that Ukrainian special forces have begun using French-made ultra-light aircraft as strike drones to attack Russian oil and gas infrastructure facilities.

According to sources, one of the units of the 14th Regiment of the Ukrainian Unmanned Systems Forces has already completed 102 combat missions using these drones, 78 of which have been considered successful.

We are talking specifically about ultra-light vehicles like the SkyRanger, which are assembled from component parts in Ukrainian workshops and converted into combat vehicles. drones.


The lightweight metal tubes of the aircraft structure are bolted together extremely simply and quickly.

These aircraft are suspended under the fuselage. artillery Ammunition or aerial bombs. Most often, these are two 120-mm mortar rounds or one OFAB-100-120 high-explosive aerial bomb.

There is information that Ukrainian specialists managed to send this device on strike with a heavier bomb load, the OFAB-250.

After dropping its main ammunition, the aircraft itself is used in kamikaze mode against the same or another target. According to one unit commander, strikes by these improvised attack aircraft have caused damage to the Russian oil and gas industry estimated at $3-5 billion.

Naturally, it is impossible to verify these figures, but the fact that this “nasty stuff” is actually being used and quite successfully cannot be denied.

According to Babel, the activities of such units are highly classified. Ultralight aircraft, thanks to their low speed and altitude, are capable of bypassing radar surveillance zones and reaching targets deep within Russian territory, attacking military-industrial and energy facilities.


The ability to fold the aircraft's wings for transport or shelter is also an advantage when carrying out special operations.

Breezer B400 and Bussard


Well, since the French have already taken action, what would we do without the Germans?

It is no secret that Breezer Aircraft's ultralight aircraft are available in Ukraine in certain quantities, and that hundreds of them could be imported from countries in the "interested" group, as the total number of aircraft produced by the Germans has exceeded 2000.


Breezer B400. Cruising speed 200 km/h, range up to 900 km (depending on modification), maximum takeoff weight 600 kg, Rotax 912 ULS engine, 100 hp, two-seater cabin

From my own experience, I can say that the plane is wonderful. I had the pleasure of flying it.


Yours truly and Breezer

So far, there's no information about Breezers being converted into drones. But that doesn't mean the Ukrainians (or Germans) aren't working on it.

And since the Germans are very happy to test their equipment in real combat conditions in Ukraine, it is most likely that they will leave the possible conversion of the Breezers into drones to the Ukrainians, and they themselves will send for testing a completely new creation, an autonomously flying ultralight aircraft (UL), named Bussard (Buzzard).


The project was based on the Breezer Sport from Breezer Aircraft in cooperation with Avilus and is designed to carry out special surveillance and reconnaissance missions.


We quickly realized that the Breezer Sport was the ideal basis for such an aircraft. In such scenarios, high speed and long range are critical. In just six months, we fully developed and built the prototype.
— says Technical Director and Project Manager Henning Boysen.


The fuselage design is sized for a takeoff weight of 800 kg, and the fuel tank capacity has been increased to 250 liters. Powered by a Rotax 916iS engine, the aircraft is capable of at least 15 hours of flight time.

The technical director makes no secret of the project's goal: military use. Many Bussard components are designed to ensure the drone's high stability and survivability.

It has a high-precision inertial navigation system that can operate in conjunction with electronic countermeasure equipment.

Of course, we don't shoot - we just watch,
— Boysen emphasizes.
But something tells me that the adversaries will not stop at just reconnaissance, because the tempting idea of ​​​​strike deep into Russia does not leave German politicians alone.

Moreover, unfortunately, almost every day (every night) everyone sees the results of strikes by both Ukrainian and other “international” drones deep within the territory of the Russian Federation.

As a result, anyone with internet access understands that official reports about the number of enemy aircraft shot down and the "minor damage caused by shrapnel from the downed drone" are unlikely to change the real picture.

And here the enemy has an opportunity, while the Ukrainians are unable to push through Tomahawks and Tauruses, to perhaps stuff a modern contraption similar to the Kaniuk with explosives and give it to the Ukrainians, or even more than one.

And quietly suggest: “What, guys, are you too brave to hit Moscow, huh?” I have no doubt that the guys won’t hesitate for a second, they’ll hit.

But all of us whose souls ache for Mother Russia, especially those on whom her fate depends, need to think about it.
48 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +9
    2 November 2025 06: 23
    Such planes are a dream for aviation enthusiasts.
    And the era has come to kill, and not to rejoice in flight.
    1. +8
      2 November 2025 08: 11
      Where are our corn growers? It seems they don't know how to do it.
      1. +2
        2 November 2025 12: 55
        They do.
        https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A1%D0%9F-30_(%D1%81%D0%B0%D0%BC%D0%BE%D0%BB%D1%91%D1%82)
      2. 0
        5 November 2025 13: 29
        No engines, no planes.
  2. Owl
    +3
    2 November 2025 06: 42
    The key is to detect them as early as possible to ensure that they can be shot down in areas with minimal risk to civilians and industrial facilities. Along likely flight paths, staging areas for combat (transport and attack) helicopters (hop-on airfields) can be established. Once the target is detected, takeoff occurs, and the UAV is destroyed with small arms and cannon fire.
    1. +1
      5 November 2025 15: 19
      Filin, the peculiarity of air interception is that the interceptor is initially guided to the target by ground-based radars (the only exception, perhaps, is the MiG-31P). All these mosquito aircraft approach us at extremely low altitudes and through gaps in the radar field, the existence of which is reported to the Ukrainian Armed Forces by NATO air and space reconnaissance. So, unfortunately, the issue of combating UAVs entirely with aircraft is impossible. Meanwhile, the problem is solved quite simply – by mass-producing inexpensive mobile systems with small arms and cannon armament that plug the gaps in the radar field, with automatic fire control systems based on Doppler radar, electro-optical, and television sensors. Depending on the type of weapon, such systems can be mounted on any chassis, even a light pickup truck. The price is next to nothing compared to Pantsir-1C, and the worst part is, all of this stuff is available in the form of security systems, etc.
  3. +9
    2 November 2025 07: 36
    I'm curious, what's the fuel consumption of such an engine at maximum load? As always, the article is a plus!
    1. +11
      2 November 2025 11: 10
      Luminman hi.
      To answer your question, depending on the Rotax 912 engine variant (modification), it consumes 16-20 liters per hour at cruising speed, which is approximately 65% ​​of its maximum.
      Thank you for the "plus" to the article! drinks
      1. +4
        2 November 2025 14: 21
        Quote: Fachmann
        in cruising mode it "eats" 16 - 20 l/hour
        About the same as a light-duty truck. We'd love to master such engines...
        1. +1
          3 November 2025 15: 08
          And what engines do Geranis use then?
          1. +2
            3 November 2025 16: 15
            Quote: Sergey Alexandrovich
            And what engines do Geranis use then?
            Who the hell knows. All this behind seven seals...
          2. +1
            6 November 2025 13: 11
            Presumably a domestic copy of the Limbach 550.
    2. +2
      2 November 2025 17: 29
      Considering there are no pilots on board, at least 150 kg is saved. You can even hang an extra fuel tank (for several hours of flight) or a lot of explosives.
      1. +2
        2 November 2025 18: 07
        This is exactly what I was writing about...
  4. +2
    2 November 2025 08: 11
    The target is quite large, what's the problem with detecting it?
    1. +11
      2 November 2025 13: 25
      Quote: Prometey
      The target is quite large, what's the problem with detecting it?

      I suspect there's nothing to detect them with... It's not that there's no continuous radar field (there is, all civilian aircraft are tracked at all flight levels, but at sufficient altitudes), but that at low altitudes (which is where they fly) it's impossible to create a continuous field due to the small detection radius. Meanwhile, the flight route is programmed (thanks to the immense help of friends who care about Ukraine) to avoid zones of possible detection.
      1. +5
        2 November 2025 15: 16
        Low-altitude radar coverage is entirely possible, but it requires a sufficient number of AWACS aircraft—NATO has about fifty of them. Russia, however, only has a handful of such aircraft, and there's no reason to expect their numbers to increase anytime soon: the A-100 project has been in development for twenty years, but its results remain unclear.
      2. +11
        2 November 2025 21: 06
        Quote: NIKNN
        I guess there's nothing to detect...

        At a minimum, it is necessary to install a continuous network of acoustic sensors (thanks to low flight) with the display of route directions and the activation of mobile air defense posts.
        This could be created in a short time if the authorities in Russia were a little less affected by embezzlement.
        1. +4
          3 November 2025 13: 04
          It's a perfectly accurate observation, and not just acoustic detection devices; it's necessary to apply the experience of the Second World War by installing "aerostats" equipped with radar systems... soldier
      3. +8
        2 November 2025 21: 24
        Quote: NIKNN
        (That's right, all civil aircraft are tracked at all flight stages, but at sufficient altitudes)

        Civilian aircraft are tracked using their own transponders.

        Quote: NIKNN
        It is impossible to create it solid due to the small detection radius.

        This requires flying radars. All developed countries have them, even if they're based on passenger aircraft. Except, as it turns out, Russia. I'd really like to ask why. For example, the public's favorite, Surovikin.
  5. +7
    2 November 2025 08: 28
    And here the enemy has an opportunity, while the Ukrainians are unable to push through Tomahawks and Tauruses, to perhaps stuff a modern contraption similar to the Kaniuk with explosives and give it to the Ukrainians, or even more than one.

    So when will the Beskydy tunnel be closed?
    It seems like there are Oreshniki and Kinzhals, which are not hindered by air defense...
  6. Lad
    -4
    2 November 2025 09: 49
    Oh, these "typical" names.
    This very simple airplane was created by a designer with the "typical" Ukrainian name Yuri Yakovlev.
    And this very simple article was written by an author with the “typical” Russian name Eugen Renk (Fachmann).
    1. 0
      2 November 2025 13: 49
      Plus definitely smile

      P.S. Let's get over the short commentary text...
    2. +6
      2 November 2025 17: 26
      I'll tell you, when Yakovlev and his friends came up with this little airplane, they were still living in Samara...
      1. 0
        5 November 2025 13: 30
        The appearance is 1 to 1 Yak-112. Only smaller.
        1. 0
          5 November 2025 21: 29
          You know, all airplanes look similar - they all have wings.
          I don't know what you two found in common. The Yak weighs 750 kg, the Aeroprakt 260 kg. In terms of price, the Yak is five times more expensive. The Yak is practically industrial, while the Aeroprakt is workshop-made. Metal and plastic. Even the Yak is more elegant in appearance. And so on. Don't compare a Zhiguli (or maybe a Volga) and a Zaporozhets—the difference between the planes is about that big.
          And you can still buy an Aeroprakt, even now. But you probably wouldn't have been able to buy a Yak even when it was in production.
          1. 0
            6 November 2025 01: 45
            The Yak was never produced. A few experimental units = 0. The engine for it is so
            and it was not found.
            1. +1
              6 November 2025 11: 02
              And it was impossible to fly it, there was nowhere and no one to fly it. Such are our conditions and laws.
  7. +6
    2 November 2025 10: 04
    and what did you want?
    The anger is mounting. And while at first such planes were unheard of, and UAVs were considered an extravagance, now they are commonplace, and further steps are being taken.

    "Everything is going according to plan." The number of Russians is decreasing. But the authorities' powers, the billionaires' wealth, all sorts of restrictions, and taxes are increasing...
  8. +7
    2 November 2025 10: 39
    Why are enemy UAVs infiltrating Russian territory? The answer is in the article "Problems of the Russian Aerospace Forces' Missile Defense Forces" from August 1, 2020. Author: S.A. Mosienko

    The article examines the problems of the air defense and missile defense forces of the Russian Aerospace Forces that arise during a group attack by small-sized air attack weapons on command posts of the highest levels of state and military command.

    Today, the air defense and missile defense capabilities of the Aerospace Forces (VKS) of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation (AF) to repel massive attacks by low-altitude air attack weapons (LAAW) on command posts at the highest levels of state and military command are clearly inadequate. The high cost of modern air defense and missile defense systems—whether over-the-horizon or over-the-horizon radars (OHR), S-300/S-400 surface-to-air missile systems (SAM), A-50/A-50U airborne early warning systems (AEW), or manned airborne interception systems (PAS)—prevents their deployment in the required numbers given the vast borders of the Russian Federation and the unpredictability of the directions from which low-altitude LAAW air strikes may be launched.
    Group tactics for UAV combat interaction increase the likelihood of penetrating the Russian Aerospace Forces' layered air defense and missile defense systems. This tactic involves the random flight of individual UAVs toward the defended target, both in altitude and heading. Currently, formation control is used worldwide, in which each UAV in a swarm takes its place in the formation. Formation-based control is an easy target for modern air defense systems, while a UAV group formed using the principle of individual "free" guidance truly resembles a swarm of insects in its behavior and is highly survivable in air defense environments, as the aircraft's trajectories are unpredictable.


    Currently, combat UAVs are controlled by ground control centers. In the near future, the UAVs built on these systems will be equipped with artificial intelligence (AI) elements. Dozens of small, low-altitude UAVs, each carrying several kilograms of ammunition, are capable of penetrating virtually any modern air defense system of the Russian Aerospace Forces.
    The above facts are sufficient to reach a disappointing conclusion: traditional radars are virtually incapable of effectively detecting and identifying small, low-speed air defense systems, even in the absence of jamming, and existing air defense missile and gun armament is incapable of effectively engaging low-altitude air defense systems. The problem of detecting small, low-altitude air defense systems is primarily due to the curvature of the Earth's surface and the obstruction angles created by the terrain, which limits the radar detection range of air defense systems flying at low and extremely low altitudes.
    1. -3
      2 November 2025 13: 51
      Your article is hopelessly outdated. How can you rely on 2020 data?

      Currently, the world uses a formation control type, in which each UAV in the swarm takes its place in the formation.

      Fierce nonsense
  9. +3
    2 November 2025 11: 03
    Quote: Lad
    Eugen renk

    It's like this guy lives in Germany. I don't like his nickname, but maybe he's Ivan Ivanovich Ivanov. He even flies solo in Germany. This guy's dream has come true – he flies. hi
    1. +6
      2 November 2025 11: 22
      Andrey, good morning!
      I am glad to "see" you again after the publication of my short work.
      At one time, when receiving citizenship, my first and last name had to be shortened a little and “Germanized”, otherwise no one from “Deutsche” could pronounce what the OVIR employee wrote in the passport.
      I don’t fly all the time, but I’ve had the chance to do so a couple of times.
      With friendly greetings hi
      1. +7
        2 November 2025 17: 25
        The Aeroprakt-22 aircraft was developed by Kuibyshev Aviation Institute (KuAI) graduates Yuri Yakovlev, Vasily Miroshnik, and Igor Vakhrushev. In the 80s, they founded the public Aeroprakt design bureau in Samara and a student design bureau at KuAI. I had the chance to work with them briefly, but back then, I had no idea how I would encounter their creations. In the early 90s, the guys received offers from the Sukhoi and Antonov design bureaus. The USSR was still in existence. But things didn't work out with Sukhoi, and they left for Kyiv, to join Antonov. Incidentally, AvtoVAZ provided the funds for the creation of the Aeroprakt company in Kyiv. More than 600 A-22 aircraft have been produced. Half of them are in Russia. So, the origins of the Aeroprakts, converted into drones, are unknown.
        1. +5
          2 November 2025 17: 29
          Anatolyhi, thanks for the addition.
          That's exactly how it is, I just didn't write about it in more detail.
          And where did they launch it from? I hope there is an office that can give an answer to this.
          Or maybe it can't... request
  10. +2
    2 November 2025 11: 37
    Quote: Fachmann
    With friendly greetings

    Good afternoon, I am always surprised by your articles.
    I couldn't overcome my fear of heights. After the Olympics, there were two helicopters in the Olympic Park, definitely not Robinsons – 15 minutes of happiness, only 5,000 rubles. I wouldn't drink enough to climb into that clunker. And I flew planes as a passenger – the farthest one was Buenos Aires. Thanks for the article. I was surprised by your photo with the plane in the background. Who's the pilot then? Oops. Eugen Renk. good drinks
  11. -8
    2 November 2025 13: 46
    Another article with propaganda fluff and a minimum of technical information
  12. +1
    2 November 2025 16: 08
    And while officials, burdened with the right to make specific decisions, together with military personnel wearing very large stars on their shoulder straps, thought and wondered for a long time how to combat this scourge
    Is there any way to stimulate this thought process or is Comrade Beria needed for this?
  13. The comment was deleted.
  14. +2
    2 November 2025 17: 32
    All this is true, but with this approach and the operations being carried out, which are based on the principle of: swarms of unmanned aerial vehicles, swarms of drones, action-reaction and vice versa, the simplicity of the actions is surprising and, as recent weeks have shown, their significant ineffectiveness and high cost.

    I simply find it hard to believe that it is possible to suffer such significant losses in personnel and equipment and at the same time not change the approach to neutralizing the threat when it has already appeared in the airspace, that is, when its appearance can no longer be prevented.

    It doesn't take a genius to conclude, after a brief analysis, that if the effectiveness and saturation of unmanned aviation is so high, then it is not the "symptoms" that need to be addressed, but the root causes.

    We are, of course, talking about decommissioning drone production plants through sabotage and related actions on enemy territory.

    This is, of course, an extremely complex operation, but the motivation should come from the arguments presented in the article.

    Liquidation of production facilities and on-site material and technical resources by all available means to prevent their rapid restoration; a range of additional measures aimed at eliminating the elements that enable production.

    Of course, in this case, special forces have significant room for maneuver, but at the same time, they must be prepared and willing to accept very high risks when conducting such operations...
    1. +1
      6 November 2025 05: 39
      Quote: Rafaello
      All this is true, but with this approach and the operations being carried out, which are based on the principle of: swarms of unmanned aerial vehicles, swarms of drones, action-reaction and vice versa, the simplicity of the actions is surprising and, as recent weeks have shown, their significant ineffectiveness and high cost.

      I simply find it hard to believe that it is possible to suffer such significant losses in personnel and equipment and at the same time not change the approach to neutralizing the threat when it has already appeared in the airspace, that is, when its appearance can no longer be prevented.

      It doesn't take a genius to conclude, after a brief analysis, that if the effectiveness and saturation of unmanned aviation is so high, then it is not the "symptoms" that need to be addressed, but the root causes.

      We are, of course, talking about decommissioning drone production plants through sabotage and related actions on enemy territory.

      This is, of course, an extremely complex operation, but the motivation should come from the arguments presented in the article.

      Liquidation of production facilities and on-site material and technical resources by all available means to prevent their rapid restoration; a range of additional measures aimed at eliminating the elements that enable production.

      Of course, in this case, special forces have significant room for maneuver, but at the same time, they must be prepared and willing to accept very high risks when conducting such operations...



      You reason from the point of view that those who must solve these problems can and want to solve them.

      In fact, it’s the other way around; they are not interested in solving this problem.

      Cm:
      "Nobody asked you to give birth."
      "Pasta always costs the same."
      "There's no money, but you hang in there."
      Well, etc.

      Bureaucratic capitalism however
      The world of parasitic profit and greed
  15. +1
    2 November 2025 20: 39
    It's time to equip paramotors in response. Even cheaper and quieter.
  16. +2
    3 November 2025 00: 12
    The comments are laughable. And Bandera turned out to be more cunning and resourceful than us... He was the first to use drones... He was the first to create mobile defense for enterprises, and he was the first to start using small aircraft (which we basically don't have... with the exception of aging foreign ones) for bombing... We're completely late everywhere. What we create can't be used in Ukraine (the Orshnik... the Burevestnik...). War management can't cope with the development and implementation of the latest warfare methods... They still can't come up with a heavy cargo drone equivalent to the Ukrainian witch. A 40-horsepower engine for this drone is giving birth in agony like a rocket engine! Your division...
    1. +3
      3 November 2025 00: 56
      Dima, hi Regarding "your division", I agree 100%.
      Well, what do comments have to do with it?
      I hope people write what they think, within the framework...
  17. -4
    3 November 2025 02: 28
    The photo of the author supposedly with his drone is impressive, but I'd be curious to know how many enemy UAVs he's shot down? Or is that a top-secret secret? wassat
  18. -5
    3 November 2025 02: 33
    Quote: Fachmann
    Dima, hi Regarding "your division", I agree 100%.
    Well, what do comments have to do with it?
    I hope people write what they think, within the framework...

    Author, what interests you more - the opinions of those who read your opus, or the "framework"? lol
  19. +1
    3 November 2025 16: 39
    But all of us whose souls ache for Mother Russia, especially those on whom her fate depends, need to think about it.

    It's worth considering that Russia probably has quite a few old aircraft and helicopters that could be sent to Ukraine, from the An-2, Yak-18, and Mi-4 to the old MiG-21, 23, 25 fighters, and so on.
    Larger aircraft such as the An-12, Il-18, Tu-134 and the like will perform even better.
    And we also need to help Venezuela in this matter if the US attacks it.
  20. +1
    4 November 2025 17: 23
    Against the Brezers and similar Foxbats, the DShK and KPVT are excellent weapons, but they should be in abundance. Incidentally, the Ukrainians benefit; the Foxbat is the result of excellent aviation design and structure. "They said and did, but where are ours?" Oh, and if they show up in Dagestan, it'll be a rip-off and that's it.
  21. +3
    4 November 2025 20: 43
    The history of manned aviation shows that the most effective means of combating it is the same aviation.

    That is, first the bombers appeared, and then the fighters came after them.

    Accordingly, the fight against drones will be no exception, and the most effective means of destroying them will be aviation.

    Already now, designers need to create a fighter jet specifically designed to combat such "strategic" drones launched to targets located hundreds and thousands of kilometers away.

    Such an anti-drone fighter could be either manned or unmanned, but it would need to be tailored specifically for this mission and have the appropriate characteristics, the most important of which should include the ability to take off and land from any airstrip. This means that this fighter could be a very nimble, mass-produced, inexpensive, and high-speed helicopter with a large ammunition complement and a powerful machine gun. Current aircraft and helicopters used for this purpose are unsuitable both due to their high cost and because they were designed for other missions, and such anti-drone hawks would need to be numerous to cover all vulnerable areas. Destroying drones at the front is a more complex task. This would require exclusively unmanned aircraft with a cost comparable to that of enemy drones.

    This is already being done, but success depends on how much we are ahead of the enemy in such developments, otherwise the enemy will be ahead of us in this component.