It's going to explode now! It's like something that never happened...

31 524 235
It's going to explode now! It's like something that never happened...

History, told by a participant in events that officially never happened. Photos courtesy of the narrator.

I'm sitting with an old friend in a cafe, sipping beer and eating dried smelt. We're chatting leisurely about this and that. About the weather, how to start a car in the cold, how to barbecue, and just about any other trivial matter... Sometimes, out of nowhere, a question pops up: "Do you remember? What's it like where you live?" And then the story begins about what it was like back then...



It's still the same: "Do you remember how they used to punish you for wearing a moustache back then?" Of course I do, they used to punish you for wearing wedding rings too, issuing orders about all sorts of non-combat losses and injuries caused by these rings... And did you wear a ring? Yes, I did. And you? No, it was inconvenient – ​​it would get caught on the cable, or the gunwale... Anyway, I just kept it at home...

Listen, you're a submariner, haven't you been briefed on nuclear emergency procedures? Of course, what's the matter?

Yes, that happened, but when exactly it happened is already forgotten, and some old photos came to hand...

Characters and performers, time and place of action.

Actors: from the Navy - a Project 671RTM submarine, from the KGB's Marine Corps - a Project 745P seagoing tug.

Executors: submarine of the Pacific Fleet submarine division, patrol cruiser "Brest" of the 1st diplomatic patrol of the Kamchatka border district of the KGB of the USSR, commander Captain 2nd Rank Fyodor Yakovlevich Dudkin.

Place of action: Sea of ​​Okhotsk.

Time of action: November 1988.

Extras: nameless and not so nameless admirals and the people: sailors from the crews of a submarine and a border ship.

Well, there was such a case...

I'll give you a rough date; a lot of time has passed. It was the late 1980s, most likely November or December. I was serving on the second-rank border patrol ship (PSKR) Brest, a Project 745P built in 1978 at the Yaroslavl Shipyard; it's probably already decommissioned (indeed, it was decommissioned in 2019). We were deployed, as usual, to the North Kuril Islands—patrolling our territorial waters from Cape Lopatka on the Kamchatka Peninsula to the middle of the Fourth Kuril Strait, quietly chasing away Japanese and Korean poachers, and performing general border service duties.

“In those distant, now almost legendary times,” the protection and defense of the state border of the USSR was an established type of service; significant forces and means for protecting the border and economic zone of the USSR had already been deployed, an extensive network of border outposts, radio technical surveillance posts (RTPN), radio technical intelligence had been built, and forces had been deployed Defense The countries on the Kuril Islands and the SSBNs on Kamchatka were protected by a fairly strong group of surface ships, and the naval units of the border troops were already well and sufficiently equipped.

And in general, there were border troops back then; it's not clear what the current "border service" is. They were fully-fledged troops of the KGB of the USSR, the real first line of defense and protection of the country, providing deployment for the army and combat reserves for fleetThe KGB's naval complement was rapidly replenished with modern vessels and was in good technical condition. Who could have imagined then that in three or four years, the troops would be systematically and mercilessly destroyed, not by an external enemy, but that the remnants would be abandoned to a slow, technical death? The entire legacy created by three generations of our people would be slaughtered by incompetent and pathologically narcissistic leaders...


The Brest project 745P corvette at anchor. 1986.

Project 97P moved easily through half-meter ice, and if you weren’t too crazy, you could even overcome almost a meter, but very carefully and without rushing.

This was the routine duty we set out for from Avacha Bay this time. We were ordered to guard the area from the 2nd Kuril Strait to the 4th Kuril Strait, took over from our colleague, and began our patrol.

November 1988, the weather was perfect. We patrolled overnight from Alaid Island to the abeam of Shelikhov Bay on Paramushir Island. In the early morning, we anchored in Shelikhov Bay, at the 5th Border Outpost of the 60th Border Detachment, and monitored the situation. The weather was, as they say, "one hundred percent"—calm, sunny, visibility over 10 kilometers. Paramushir Island was already covered in snow, the sun sparkling off the snow crystals.

The Alaid volcano island, one of the most beautiful volcano islands of the Kuril chain, was revealed in all its glory.


Alaid Volcano Island. 1988.

The weather forecast, which we usually received from Japanese radio stations on a fax machine using a Volna M receiver, was quite useful. A cyclone was moving through the center of the Sea of ​​Okhotsk, and the weather there was nasty, but we weren't affected. The crew was quietly going about their business as usual—they had just changed their 12-hour watch, completed their inspection, and completed their checkup. weapons and technical equipment. We were gathering for lunch. The commander was Captain 2nd Rank Fyodor Yakovlevich Dudkin, a talented commander, an excellent navigator, and an excellent educator. He was highly respected and respected among the officers, warrant officers, and sailors. He was finishing his service on this ship project and had already been approved "from above" to form a new crew to receive a Project 1124P border guard ship from the industry. We called them "motorcycles" for the roar of their turbines and their speed. Two such ships had already been received, and three more were awaiting delivery from the industry.

In short, I'm just sitting here smoking...

At lunchtime we received approximately the following RDO from the division:

At W=D= (approximately midway between Paramushir Island and Terpeniya Bay on Sakhalin Island, that is, the southwestern part of the Sea of ​​Okhotsk), a submarine is in distress and has lost propulsion. Weather in the area: sea force 6-7, wind 25 m/s, visibility less than 2 miles, snow drifts. A dry cargo ship (I don't remember the name) is en route to the area. Proceed to the designated point and provide assistance.

We quickly raised anchor and, under the guidance of two cars, “rushed” to the point.

So what does "take off" mean for a Project 745P vessel? After all, the design calls for it to be a seagoing tug with an unlimited range and unrestricted seaworthiness. It has a displacement of 1620 tons, a length of 56,5 meters, a beam of 12,6 meters, a draft of 4,6 meters, and a reinforced ice belt of 20 mm at the waterline. The crew consists of 47 people, including six officers, five warrant officers, and 36 sailors.

This "battleship" is armed with two AK-230M 30mm cannons with 2000 rounds of ammunition, and fire control is provided by two "Kolonka" artillery fire control systems on the upper bridge. Its radio and television equipment includes two "Don" radars and a decent HF and VHF communications suite, along with standard ZAS and SBD systems. The propulsion system consisted of two 13D100 main diesel engines, each producing 1500 horsepower, driving two 1100 kW DC generators, a PG-950 electric propulsion motor, and a fixed-pitch propeller in a steering nozzle.

There were two controlled fire extinguishing monitors with automatic foam delivery, dewatering equipment with a total capacity of up to 1500 m³/hour, a water-based radiation and chemical protection system, and radiation and chemical reconnaissance devices. A satellite navigation system—the "Shlyuz" system—was already installed, receiving data from the civilian "Tsikada" navigation system and a unit for receiving data from the combat "Parus" navigation system. Naturally, there were rescue and work boats, as well as six PSN-10 life rafts.

The tug's towing capabilities were impressive: a stern hawse with a folding roller, a 22-ton towing hook, a 300 mm towing bollard for towing with a pull of up to 22 tonnes/force, and an automatic towing winch—the tug's primary "weapon": the automatic winch had a pulling force of 18 tonnes, a 56 mm steel towing rope, and a 500 m rope length on the winch drum (from memory). The hull was specially reinforced for towing. An electric windlass was on the forecastle, and a capstan was on the poop. Towing was possible for any ship and vessel with a displacement of up to 10,000 tonnes, but this is uncertain. At the same time, thanks to the crew's efforts, everything was always in excellent working order, and the crew knew how to use all this wealth.

Another thing to note: in terms of crew habitability and comfort, Project 745P is simply a luxury naval hotel in Soviet times. Officers' cabins are single-berth (the commander's, in addition to his bedroom, also has a lounge; the first mate has a cabin next to the commander's; the political officer and the BC-5 commander have a single cabin; and the navigator and the BC-4 RTS commander have double cabins, which also accommodated passengers). The midshipmen's cabins are double-berth, with plastic wall panels, refrigerators, a private shower with a toilet, a bunk, a desk, a wardrobe, a bookcase, a bookshelf, and a sofa.

The superstructure portholes were large and rectangular, while the hull portholes were round. Naturally, the portholes had armored covers, and they were required to be closed in the event of an alarm. The noise from the main engines was quite tolerable, becoming completely unnoticeable after a day. The crew quarters, each accommodating six people, were quite adequate, though not like those on civilian ships, which have smaller crews (no gunners, no chemist, fewer radio operators).

So, rough weather at sea didn't greatly affect living conditions. There was a shared galley for the crew and officers, a crew mess hall with a projection booth, and a separate wardroom for officers and warrant officers. Officers included the commander, first mate, political officer, BC-1 commander, BC-4-slR commander, and BC-5 commander. Warrant officers included the boatswain, communications team petty officer, electrical team petty officer, engine team petty officer, and a medical assistant. Up to 20 passengers could be carried on board, and even more soldiers were carried…

There was also an armory in the forward section of the ship, in the officers' corridor, a weapons storage room: AK-74 assault rifles for sailors and PM pistols for all officers and warrant officers, plus eight pistols for the inspection team, along with ammunition for assault rifles and pistols. TNT blocks (0,5, 1,5, and 3 kg) for detonating mines and other such items were also stored there, as needed. Detonator cords, electric detonators, and other such wonders were stored separately in the commander's safe. The armory also contained missiles For flare pistols and linethrowers. There are also night vision devices and other things.

There were also some "tricky" rooms—the ZAS post, the encryption office, and the secret office. Well, I shouldn't really go into that...

The ship's water and provisions endurance was 40 days, but it regularly served for 60 days on the Magadan and Chukotka fronts, calling at the ports of Magadan or Provideniya to replenish water and occasionally fuel. Hot water was always available for showers for both the crew and the command staff.

Our "battleship" reached a speed of 10,8 knots under one engine, and could "fly" at a whopping 13,8 knots under two. Well, it wasn't a race car, as you can imagine. And its purpose wasn't track racing, but towing, icebreaking in its base areas, rescue operations, and convoy duty. It was a fine ship in capable hands.

Brief information from the AI: Recommended calculation for towing the Project 671RTM submarine.

1. Initial data on the Project 671RTM submarine:

Surface displacement: 6990 t. Length 106,1 m. Width 10,78 m. Draft 7,8 m.

2. Requirements for the tug:

Power: Towing a 6990 t towing vessel in open sea requires a tug with an engine power of at least 6000–8000 hp.

Bollard Pull: The minimum bollard pull requirement should be 60-80 tonnes to provide sufficient reserve for manoeuvring and to compensate for the effects of waves, wind and current.

Displacement: To ensure sufficient seaworthiness and stability, the tug must have a displacement of at least 2500–3500 tons.

3. Requirements for the towing rope:

Recommended option: synthetic rope

Diameter: With a traction force of 60–80 tons and a safety factor of 3, the rope's breaking load must be at least 180–240 tons. This requires a nylon rope with a diameter of 100–120 mm.

Acceptable option: steel cable

Diameter: For a breaking load of 180-240 tons, a steel cable with a diameter of at least 75-85 mm is required.

4. Limitations on excitement:

Towing in sea state 4–6 is highly undesirable and prohibited.

Towing should only be carried out when the sea state is no more than 3-4 points.

5. Conclusion

Towing a submarine of up to 6990 tons by a tugboat with a displacement of 1500 tons and a capacity of 3000 horsepower is insufficient for towing such an object.

Regardless of the type of cable (56 mm steel or 80 mm nylon), it is not strong enough to handle the required pulling force in rough seas.

Towing in sea state 4–6 remains unacceptable and dangerous.

The bottom line is rather grim: towing a stricken submarine under these sea conditions and the tug's performance characteristics is simply unacceptable. We must wait for better weather and use a more powerful seagoing tug and a more powerful towing gear. Curtain call...

While they were sailing, the boatswain prepared the towing equipment. After four or five hours, we entered a storm zone of 7-9 points, and around one or two in the morning, we approached the site of the accident. It was devastating: the sea was "higher than the village council," the wave was breaking through the superstructure (which is about 18 meters high), meaning it was at least 8 points, tearing the boats from their moorings. Snow flurries mixed with sheets of spray raised by the wind—this is when the thin top layer of the water is torn off and turned into foam—all of this flying at terrifying speed across the surface and slamming into the superstructure and portholes.

We also had to prepare to establish contact with the submarine—after all, the navy and border troops operated on different codes and frequencies and didn't communicate directly. But since we had a complete set of naval documents, the radio operators worked tirelessly to prepare equipment and special means for communicating with their "neighbors." Overall, the task was no trivial one. Our communications capacity was also insufficient; we needed a repeater to support all the necessary communication channels with the fleet and the division command post, and, as was the case, everything had to be covered by the ZAS. Such a repeater was sent to us—a Project 97P patrol cruiser was removed from the Magadan sector; it arrived in our area within a few hours.


This is what a 6-point flood looks like from the starboard corridor. PSKR "Brest", 1984.

In the floodlight, we saw a distressed submarine on the surface, and a bulk carrier of 15-20 tons bobbing nearby (about 10 cable cars). Waves periodically rolled over the submarine; imagining how they were going to accept a tug was a fantasy... We contacted the bulk carrier: it was leaving the area, lacking the necessary rescue equipment and making towing impossible due to its size. It handed us the location of the accident and departed. Well, we had no complaints, and began preparing for the tow.

After some fiddling with the ZAS, they established contact with the submarine. According to their information, they were en route between bases from Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky to Bolshoy Kamen for repairs. As a result of an accident, the reactor had lost feedwater from the circuit. The reactor was being shut down to a minimum. There was a risk of the core melting out into the sea. The submarine was heading toward the waves at low speed under diesel power. There was a limited fuel supply and a power shortage. There was no water specially prepared for the reactor, and there was insufficient power to supply all systems. Basically, given the weather, it was all over.

We activated the KDU-5 (the ship's dosimetric unit, a radiation monitoring device), and the background radiation was slightly elevated. When the level steadily climbed, the first mate reported to the captain the threshold for issuing individual dosimeters. Tension quickly mounted among those aware of the situation (and there were only two of them). After some deliberation, the captain vetoed the issuance of dosimeters, not wanting to increase the level of anxiety on board. There was a tense conversation between the first mate and the captain, but they limited themselves to monitoring the KDU-5. If the radiation level continued to rise, then dosimeters would be issued.

The first mate was quite tense—there was a whiff of a court martial, and both he and the captain knew it. Fortunately, the others were calmly preparing the equipment for tow and suspected nothing. The captain and first mate pondered the question of how to organize and execute the tow, but they already considered that secondary—the most important thing was somehow approaching the boat and launching the towboat in this weather. And then, as God would have it...

Going any closer than 1 cable would have been suicide, and downright scary—the ship would toss us at the boat like a splinter, smashing us to pieces—theirs were almost 7000 tons, compared to ours, 1500. But there were no other options. This is where the commander, Fyodor Dudkin, fully revealed his talent. He had a feel for the ship, as they say, down to his fingertips, knew her inside and out, and taught the crew to do the same, perfectly sensing her reactions to propeller speed and rudder position. After about an hour and a half, we got the hang of it, mastering the rhythm of the waves and the wind drift, stalling on a wave, and the effect of the superstructure's windage. We took up a position to windward and aligned with the boat as best we could on the stern headings.

It was impossible to fire a heaving line in such conditions, but for the sake of experimentation, we tried it—the boatswain managed to throw it about 40 meters… Approaching the boat that far is basically impossible, unless you want to commit suicide immediately and without hassle. They started feeding nylon line to the boat with a linethrower, fortunately, they had a good supply of both rockets and lines. People were blown off the quarterdeck, and the first mate eventually chased everyone away and fired the linethrower himself, occasionally swapping with the boatswain. Even though everyone on the upper deck was tied up with safety lines, the feeling was eerie. The risk of falling overboard was very high; the ship was rocking and tossing like a ball, and the quarterdeck was periodically swamped by waves. The captain tried to get as close to the boat as possible, otherwise all methods of tugboat deployment would become problematic, and as time passed, everyone from the boat was shouting obscenities over the VHF ZAS.

The boat was 90% submerged; if you let your guard down, you'd be floundering, though not for long. A crew of four to six divers worked on the submarine's forecastle; the water was mercilessly pouring over them, and they periodically retreated. After about an hour and a half of continuous attempts, they finally caught a couple of lines and began to pull in the towlines with their capstan: first a line, then 50mm nylon, then 100mm nylon, then 250mm nylon—this refers to the standard measurement used in the navy at the time, expressed in millimeters of circumference for nylon mooring lines; for steel cables, the standard was in millimeters of diameter.

When we selected a 250mm nylon towing line on the boat and began to take up the slack and begin towing, the nylon quickly snapped under the force of the wave. It became clear we needed a steel towing line, and we had one standard, a 56mm one, with an 18-ton automatic winch and a length of 500 meters. Incidentally, these nylon mooring lines break with a terrifying sound, like an explosion and a flash, and the line flies with incredible speed and force, easily tearing a person in half, so the danger of being crushed by a broken line was serious.

So, we repeated everything, and having used up almost the entire supply of emergency lines, we managed to feed the nylon cables to the boat with difficulty and began to pay out the steel towline. That's when the inevitable happened: the steel cable wouldn't reach the boat, but, due to its enormous weight of almost 5 tons, simply fell vertically downwards. Considering that 100 mm nylon was attached to it, all this bliss could have wound itself around the propeller... We were saved by the design of the rudder-propeller system: the propeller rotated in the rudder nozzle, almost completely enclosed by the nozzle's cylinder. A couple of times we felt excessive strain on the propeller, our hearts sank, and we felt the steel cable rub against the propeller shaft, but we escaped...


Project 671 RTM submarine. Source


Towing of the Project 671RTM submarine. On the quarterdeck are the senior mate, the quartermaster, and the holdman. October 20, 1988.

When we started the tug, we had to let out about 400 meters of steel rope, and this "rope" was rubbing against our propeller. The submarine also endured stress, on top of the storm and November temperatures: while heaving in the steel rope, the submariners bent the axle of the bow capstan (the capstan was retractable), and the whole saga almost went down the drain, along with the boat...

By God's grace, by 8:3 or 10:4 a.m., tugboats of the required thickness and length were launched and, adjusting to the waves and wind, they began to slowly tow this miracle to Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky. The towing speed was slowly increased. The submariners were already tearfully pleading for this – the reactor's temperature was creeping up, well above 80 degrees Celsius, and there was no sign of cooling. After a while, the submarine's commander announced over the VHF that in three or four hours, the reactor would melt through the bottom of the hull and fall into the sea, causing a thermal explosion, a small "boom." For the layman, it could be described as: Chernobyl squared, no one would be happy, only the Sea of ​​Okhotsk could save the Far East from radiation contamination.

The situation snowballed, and the radiation level recorded by the KDU-5 increased significantly. Many years have passed, so I'll say the radiation level sometimes reached 1 R/hour, albeit briefly. The first mate, the boatswain, and several sailors—those who spent a lot of time on the upper deck—were given dosimeters. At the commander's request, the doses received were not recorded or recorded.

The submarine requested power, if possible. By lunchtime, I think we were able to get a power cable there. After consulting with the engineer, the ship's commander gave the order early in the morning to prepare distillate for the submarine, although we obviously couldn't produce the required quality of distillate, and the distillate production rate was finite and impossible to increase. The submariners asked for at least something, otherwise there would be a "boom"... And we managed this miracle, thanks to the bilge crew and the entire BC-5. The distillate was produced, and an hour later, the hose for transporting the distillate was delivered to the submarine.

We'd already been preparing for this (not for the reactor's collapse, of course, but for its cooling)—we distilled the water twice with the boiler, shouted "banzai," and hauled more "ropes" onto the boat, then pumped water through hoses to cool the reactor. That's how we towed it—with 56mm steel towlines and 250mm nylon towlines for safety, a power cable, a fuel hose, and a freshwater/distillate hose. Oh, I forgot—we also installed a telephone line to the boat and established a phone line with it for coordination and easier communication on special issues.

But the chief mate's biggest nightmare was calculating the towing. Well, it seemed like no big deal—just use the strongest one and push and pull, the situation would dictate. But no... All these calculations had to be submitted with justification "upstairs" for approval. And, of course, his skill would be assessed, and not just anywhere, but at the Navy Headquarters itself, where fat and lazy admirals who have forgotten the sea sit, and all the work is done by all sorts of small fry from kapley to kapdva... The chief mate opened the ship's logbook, the naval officer's handbook, and the boatswain's handbook—that was all the literature... And there, as you can imagine, you need to know the wavelength, take into account all the parameters of the tonnage, tugs, and other such quirks... But towing a nuclear submarine in stormy weather was not an option, and there was a direct ban on towing in stormy weather with sea state greater than 4...


Towing a nuclear submarine. Chief mate and battleship officer of the patrol cruiser "Brest". October 20, 1988.


Figure 18. Submarine towing. October 20, 1988.

So, after much sweating and sketching, the first mate reported the towing plan to the commander, and this plan was reported "up"... What happened then is beyond words... Just like Vysotsky said: "And then it began, you can't describe it in words, and where did all this strength in my arms come from?"

Orders poured in from various admirals: immediately reduce/increase towing speed, replace the tugs with 350mm ones (where to get that on the open sea—the Moskva River admirals didn't care), stop supplying feedwater—otherwise, there'd be a tribunal (wow, is an admiral going to cool the reactor by peeing? And what would a thermal explosion from a reactor falling out of our ship do?), and other such wonders—every commander considered it their duty to issue the strictest orders and threaten tribunals, execution, dismissal, and demotion...

In short, the entire towing process was accompanied by intensive "management" by the General Staff of the Navy, under Gorshkov's personal and sensitive supervision. We were linked directly to the General Staff of the Navy via communications. To assist us in maintaining contact with the command post, the Navy's General Staff deployed a Project 97P "baboon"—I believe it was the "XXV Congress of the CPSU"—from the Magadan sector, acting as a repeater. Our border command, through our communications channels, advised us to endure and continue towing as best we could. Although they initially expressed dissatisfaction, once they heard what Moscow was doing, they gave up and offered moral support.

And there's a lot more, I won't recount the nonsense of the Moskva River admirals. But they really got on our nerves... During one of the sessions, the commander, unable to bear it (and Fyodor Dudkin was a man of rare endurance), told them to go to hell and cut the connection. They "pressed their ears," thinking they'd be removed from their positions... Things turned out alright, though.


Anchoring in Vasilyev Bay. October 20, 1988.

But there was also a different danger. While in a wave and under tow, the ship lost the ability to quickly respond to wave direction and changes in wave length. Given that the towing speed was generally slow, close to the wave propagation speed, and that it was impossible to significantly change it because the towing time was limited by the reactor's condition, increasing the towing speed was technically impossible without the fatal risk of breaking the last towline. Reducing the speed quickly was impossible due to the enormous inertia of the entire ship-tug-submarine system in stormy weather. Consequently, we regularly encountered loss of ship control and reduced stability.

The wave would periodically overtake us; we'd be riding its crest for a while, and any jerk could have simply capsized the ship. Both the captain and first mate were well aware of this, but there was no quick fix. Adjusting the towing speed abruptly in stormy conditions was even more dangerous than the towing itself and catching the wave crest. So we sailed under the constant threat of either capsizing or snapping the tugs and losing the boat. We monitored the ship's subtlest vibrations and the wave's progress, turning the engine at 50 rpm, plus or minus, since any greater change would have caused jerks and inevitably broken the tugs. All we could do was pray...

The Lord heard our prayers – the cyclone gradually moved north toward Magadan, the wind died down to 10-15 m/s, and after about four hours, the sea swell decreased first to 5, then to a perfectly acceptable 4, and finally to 3, and we breathed a sigh of relief. True, a large residual swell continued, but the situation was no longer as tense.

So how could this have happened without an adversary? An American R-3 Orion showed up at midday, and it was a real nightmare. We were towing at about 5-6 knots, but after escaping the cyclone, we gradually picked up speed to 7-8 knots, fortunately the sea had calmed down and the jolts were barely noticeable. Things were looking up, and after a while, the radiation levels on the KDU-5 began to drop, and we perked up.

Our superiors gave us the task of towing the submarine to base in Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky. But as we approached Paramushir Island, the naval commanders issued a blunt order: prevent a disgrace! This meant preventing the submarine from entering base "by the nose," towed by a border guard. This is understandable—entering Avacha Bay with such a "tail" would have to be done during daylight hours, the fairway is narrow, and the entire public, as residents of Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky, would witness this disgrace—the glorious submarine fleet being towed by the nose by border guards... So, at the roadstead of the 3rd Border Outpost of the 1st Border Commandant's Office of the 60th Vilna-Kuril Order of Lenin and Alexander Nevsky Kamchatka Border Detachment (3 PZ 1 PC 60 PO) on the southern tip of Paramushir Island. Paramushir in Vasiliev Bay, the boat and I anchored.

We were told, however, that the naval rescuers couldn't get out to sea yet, couldn't assemble crews, had no working towing gear, no functioning feedwater systems for the reactors, no one thing, no other... But after a while, a single, half-dead, specialized naval rescuer somehow managed to drag himself to us, and we were ordered to hand over the boat to him. The rescuer cursed like a cab driver, there was no water, no towing gear, and he begged us...

We took the mooring lines from the boat, which were torn like old rags, the submariners gave us a few cans of roach, some alcohol, and our battleship went on to duty guarding the border.

That's the whole story.

The crew performed brilliantly. And when the orchestra promised by command to greet the ship on its return from duty didn't show up at the dock, the crew immediately realized they'd get nothing for this "inconvenience." They were also warned not to discuss the towing incident anywhere, ever. The crew's quarters, personal belongings, and all the ship's skerries were searched—all photographs of the incident were confiscated, anyone who had them. Only these four photos remain (maybe a couple more remain); otherwise, this whole story would simply be nonexistent.

While the boat was being towed, on orders from division headquarters, lists of government awards were prepared and sent to the division via encrypted message. We were given the order: officers would receive orders from the Red Banner to the Red Star; warrant officers, petty officers, and sailors would receive medals from "For Distinction in Guarding the State Border" to "For Military Merit." Particularly outstanding individuals were permitted, at the discretion of the command, to be nominated for orders.

But of the promised orders and medals, I believe they only awarded two petty officers or sailors the "For Distinguished Service in Guarding the State Border" award, and even then, they didn't specify what for. They were awarded on Border Guard Day, eight months later, and not even on February 23rd. Six months later, the commander was awarded the Order "For Service to the Motherland," 3rd Class. By then, he was already on another ship and deservedly received the award for impeccable service and mastering new technology—basically, "for the sand." The award document didn't mention the rescue operation...

So that’s what was, what wasn’t…

Incidentally, the first mate wasn't the only one left unscathed—for the radio operator's failure to destroy the tape (unclassified, admittedly) in the radio room, the first mate was awarded... a disciplinary measure—a severe reprimand, I believe. A fine equivalent of a medal, what can you say?

Incidentally, in the late 90s, in St. Petersburg, I accidentally ran into the head of the RTS from that boat—or rather, he recognized me. We hugged, talked... That's the story.

Postscript


An old submarine buddy of mine, when asked about an accident in the mid-80s on a Pacific Fleet submarine, immediately mentioned this incident: October 20, 1988, Sea of ​​Okhotsk, submarine 671RTM. They (the Pacific Fleet) had been reminded of this several times in their emergency orders. We've been friends for almost 30 years, and it never occurred to anyone to mention it. That's how it is...
235 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +41
    1 November 2025 04: 27
    Without words, total respect!!!! soldier
  2. +37
    1 November 2025 04: 46
    There were border troops... And they had everything like in the Soviet Union. Almost everything... Except for the Strategic Missile Forces. Their own navy, their own air force, their own artillerymen, their own sappers.
    1. +16
      1 November 2025 11: 01
      Dear border guard!
      As you may recall, the KGB troops of the USSR also had "Strategic Missile Forces" - the ships of Project 1124P and 11351P even had anti-aircraft missiles!
      Well, what a border drive - isn't that like the Strategic Missile Forces? drinks
      1. +3
        1 November 2025 15: 21
        Unfortunately, you are mistaken about the SAM system on the 1124P; instead of a SAM system, the ships were equipped with a second 725 caliber 57mm AU.
        But the "Nerei" had the "Osa-M" air defense missile system.
        1. +9
          1 November 2025 16: 06
          I won't argue, I'll just show you one photo here – the "Bditelny" surface-to-air missile system, circa 1986-1987. Side number 145. As you can see, the air defense system is still in place. It's not my fault...
          I apologize for the quality of the photo - the trash on the slide hasn't been cleaned up yet...

          Nearby is a photo of the same ship from the "Border Guard" forum, the same side number.

          Since the color photo was taken in Avacha Bay in 1986-1987, there is no doubt...
        2. +8
          1 November 2025 16: 12
          I'll add something else in the following context...

          As for the various claims on various forums, they don't always correspond to reality. The industry initially produced one set of weapon configurations, then refined them, often "castrating" them or, conversely, adding...
          In Kamchatka, the ships of the MChPV were sometimes "modified" during repairs, including the removal of weapons, radar systems, and other gadgets. Tracking this is a tricky business; OSINT is required...
          1. +4
            1 November 2025 19: 20
            This means that some of the border "Albatrosses" carried the SAM system, while others did not, and instead they had the AU-725. The same "Brilliant", for example.
            1. +7
              1 November 2025 19: 28
              Vladislav, it's likely that the Project 1124P was delivered to the Pacific Ocean in its original form for a reason - the navy didn't have enough forces "during the period of threat" (I hope you and the readers know the meaning of this term), so the industry provided them directly for possible transfer to the naval forces.
              In other theatres, of course, the atmosphere was different.
              There's a photo of SAM missiles being loaded onto the Bditelny PSKR, taken from a border guards forum:
              1. +1
                1 November 2025 19: 34
                After all, in the event of war, the Marine Border Guard would hand over everything that could float to the fleet. That's how it was during the First World War, and that's how it was during the Great Patriotic War.
                1. +8
                  1 November 2025 19: 39
                  Quote: Grencer81
                  After all, in the event of war, the Marine Border Guard would hand over everything that could float to the fleet. That's how it was during the First World War, and that's how it was during the Great Patriotic War.

                  Exactly, you are absolutely right.
                  And it is very correct.
                  Today, the "optimizers" have destroyed the border troops; now they're called "border service." And besides the unsmiling girls at the airport passport control windows, there's no one... or almost no one... am
                  Kursk region in our eternal memory - what not to do.
                  1. +4
                    1 November 2025 22: 04
                    And they also created Rosgranstroy in the Ministry of Transport... It's such a feeding trough for parasites!!!
                    1. +6
                      1 November 2025 22: 06
                      Ros... what? And where? belay
                      Holy-holy... save and preserve...
                      We've arrived... thanks for the amazing news... am
                      1. +5
                        1 November 2025 22: 09
                        First, they abolished the engineering units within the border guards along with them, and in their place they created the Federal Agency for the Development of the State Border (Rosgranitsa).
                        In 2016, it was liquidated, and its functions were transferred to the Ministry of Transport and renamed Rosgranstroy.
                      2. +11
                        1 November 2025 22: 21
                        Yeah...
                        After the abolition of the PV as an institution, I lost interest in the service; it became very sad, like next to a corpse that is always lying there for people to see and no one wants to bury it...

                        Then I had to consult an officer on service matters, I had to familiarize myself with the regulations - I was simply speechless...
                        I asked my colleagues who were still in charge there what they were doing.

                        The answers left me speechless... but then I remembered the inscription on King Solomon's ring:
                        "This too shall pass..."

                        I hope that what has been built over generations will be restored.
      2. Aag
        +3
        2 November 2025 01: 21
        Quote: Vasily_Ostrovsky
        Dear border guard!
        As you may recall, the KGB troops of the USSR also had "Strategic Missile Forces" - the ships of Project 1124P and 11351P even had anti-aircraft missiles!
        Well, what a border drive - isn't that like the Strategic Missile Forces? drinks

        Excuse me, Dear Author - what relation could the Strategic Missile Forces, in principle, have to border guards (with all due respect to those times?). With all due respect to you, and to your article (thank you - I cried, I remembered my youth - yeah! - and stupidity, and daring - enough...).
        They were up to no good... No, - perhaps not such nonsense as you described... But we had to sort it out "as the situation dictated"... Yes, - a little later...
        At the time you describe, not only I))), but also a significant part of the officers and ensigns (with all due respect) of the Strategic Missile Forces were in Plesetsk...
        Nooo... Some handed over "old" equipment ("Pioneers"), some guarded positions in Transbaikalia (Chita-46, 47)..
        He put out fires and fought floods in Transbaikalia—the year (1988) was the year of perhaps the largest mass graduation of the Strategic Missile Forces’ higher education institutions...
        Almost everyone was subjected to reorganization, "retraining" at "Topol"...
        Through Plesetsk... Further distribution, - as luck would have it...
        1. Aag
          +6
          2 November 2025 01: 39
          Sorry, I got distracted...
          Thanks to the author (!) – it was a pleasure to read. In every sense: artistically, technically (as far as I can appreciate and understand the language of the submarine)...
          Everyone has their own specific jargon...
          Kudos to the Author - he didn't overwork me, he only got me interested with his slang phraseological units... Special thanks for the generally accepted, "general military" phrases!
          Yeah, - apparently, - I'm a bit more clumsy than the Author...
          In this case, it’s not offensive at all!
          Moreover, it’s nice that the “Old Peppers” are still in action – and they can do it!!
          I wish everyone health and optimism...
          1. +4
            2 November 2025 09: 05
            Thank you, I'm writing while it's being written...
            When the "infantry" rolled a canister towards us, we were told that "The boot is always higher than the shoe"... this had a sad meaning - for some reason, the "sea" was always commanded by infantrymen...
            it was fun drinks
            1. Aag
              +1
              2 November 2025 15: 02
              Success!
              In this field...

              And, in general, in life(
              like a younger brother, if you will allow me...).
              1. +1
                2 November 2025 15: 26
                Thanks for your kind words...
                Sincerely hi
        2. +2
          2 November 2025 09: 01
          Thanks for the good "joke" - but the border "RVSN" in the text are described as a smile lol

          Of course, three ships with anti-aircraft missile systems for all border troops is a very formidable weapon, which is why people called them "Rocketmen", "RVSN" and other non-offensive word forms. wassat

          Of course, the KGB didn't keep fools in the troops... oops... well, there weren't many of them bully Everyone knew and understood what the Strategic Missile Forces were and what they were doing to support missile launches at the Kura range in Kamchatka. drinks
          But your history of the real Strategic Missile Forces would be interesting to learn about. In those days, everything was completely closed, I mean land-based/silo-based ones. With the submarines of the SSBNs of Project 667B, BD and BDR, it was simpler... more accessible. fellow
          1. Aag
            +1
            2 November 2025 13: 26
            Sorry for the subtle criticism, - Appreciated!
            Sorry, Kid... feel
            Nevertheless, - once again, - Thank you!!!
            Yesterday I called a friend (alas, there are fewer and fewer of them)...
            We lived in the same house... We served in the same regiment... After leaving the Russian Armed Forces, we worked for the same organization...
            Fate has blown me away...

            Thank you, we met yesterday!
            The first lines of your article were enough...
            drinks
            1. +3
              2 November 2025 15: 30
              And this is the best gratitude for the article!

              We are leaving quietly, for our children and grandchildren we are just old people, sometimes telling stories with a shot of liquor...
              Yes, tales... God grant that they have fewer tales of this kind - between life and death. drinks
              Greetings to your friend/neighbor hi
  3. +14
    1 November 2025 04: 46
    "White Storm" is just child's play compared to this epic, and it ended, however, tragically.
    1. +11
      1 November 2025 04: 59
      from Japanese radio stations to a fax machine
      Fak-P "Ladoga"
      receiver "Volna M"
      All-wave radio receiver "Volna-K"
      satellite navigation system – the "Gateway" equipment
      I installed the first one on the PSKR205P in Korsakov... At the Moscow Marine Federation it was called "Schooner"
      Now it's perceived as a feat, but before it was everyday, difficult, but necessary work. To the author hi drinks
      1. +10
        1 November 2025 11: 05
        Thank you wink

        The Shlyuz system was first delivered to the Moscow Space Research and Production Association in 1982, on the Kamchatka Project 745P space cruiser. It operated using the Tsikada space navigation system (SNS), and the unit was installed and operated using the Parus combat space navigation system.

        Back then it was something super exotic, now this whole thing is in a smartphone...
        1. +4
          1 November 2025 11: 28
          Quote: Vasily_Ostrovsky
          Back then it was something super exotic,

          And so that no one would press the buttons in vain, quickly cover it with plexiglass and lock it. request
          1. +7
            1 November 2025 11: 44
            No, it never came to that. wassat
            And the plexiglass cover was standard good
      2. +2
        2 November 2025 15: 42
        Sorry, let me add...
        Later, around 1985-1986, ships in the 1st division began to be equipped with "Shhuny" systems, which are exclusively civilian versions of the "Shlyuz" system.
        The schooner did not have modules for working with the Parus BKNS, meaning it processed only civilian satellites.
        I just remembered the satellite numbers - 105 to 112 were "Cicada", and 101 to 105 were "BKNS "Parus"... but I'm not sure of the exact numbers, how many years have passed...

        However, the coordinates on the Parus were more accurate, and the frequency of their appearance in the visibility zone was rare... But in the polar regions, only they gave a confident location wassat

        And there the standard deviation (RMS) was calculated, with the intersection angles displayed, so that one could decide for oneself whether to accept this observation or reject it. winked
        1. +1
          3 November 2025 11: 53
          Quote: Vasily_Ostrovsky
          in 1985-1986, they began to install "Schooners",

          We delivered the first "Schooner" to the "Pioneer of Sakhalin" shipyard in Sov.Gavan.... At that time I was working at VP ERA. hiThe setup was done by specialists from Izhevsk, and then we mastered it ourselves...
  4. kig
    +19
    1 November 2025 04: 56
    Yeah, right...I take my hat off to the border guards and sailors. hi
  5. +18
    1 November 2025 05: 16
    So we towed it—56mm steel tow lines and 250mm nylon tow lines for safety, a power cable, a fuel hose, and a freshwater/distilled water hose. Oh, I forgot—we also ran a telephone line to the boat and set up a phone line with it for coordination and easier communication on special issues.

    Holy shit... How did they even use these lines on a submarine? You can only moor wet nylon with curses and swearing at its creator. Imagine bending a wet log... And the steel cable... 56 mm! All this incredible weight... In the cold, in the water, on the deck of a submarine where there are no bulwarks!
    The Project 97P "baboon" was removed from the Magadan direction

    And the Project 745P was called "Chumichka." The 97P was called "Baboon" because of the bean-shaped underwater section, but they were called "baboon," of course...
    1. +14
      1 November 2025 06: 46
      And the Project 745P was called "Chumichka." The 97P was called "Baboon" because of the bean-shaped underwater section, but they were called "baboon," of course...

      I heard another version - "Baba Inna", although maybe I'm confused. feel
      Let's return to Chumichka PSK pr.745P, I took it upon myself to post a photo of the ship.
      Special thanks to the author for posting the memories!
      1. +13
        1 November 2025 11: 17
        Thanks for the photo, when transporting the article the photo of this ship was “washed away” somewhere, unfortunately...
        I screw it on again:
    2. +17
      1 November 2025 11: 13
      That's exactly how they handled the ends - imagine trying to pull out not nylon, but a steel weight of almost 5 tons... the submarine sailors were simply some kind of fairy-tale heroes, and this is not a metaphor or a joke... how they did it - those involved in this case did not understand...

      In the Moscow Black Sea Fleet, they called the Project 279 (or 229, I don’t remember) transports “Chumichki” - they were old transports, and they looked the same.
      The pr.745P didn't have its own name, but the pr.97P was called "baboons", and the stress was on the BA wassat

      The hull shape of the Project 97P was such that it almost never stood on an even keel, there was constant rolling... in 3-4 point waves, broadside to the wave, this steamship could roll up to 35-40 degrees, I'm not kidding... the stabilizers were of little help lol
    3. +2
      1 November 2025 18: 12
      Puncher (Eugene)

      How did they handle these lines on a submarine? You can only moor wet nylon with curses and swearing at its creator. Imagine bending a wet log... And the steel cable... 56 mm!


      ...that's why a mooring crew without a sledgehammer is like having no hands.
  6. BAI
    +16
    1 November 2025 06: 31
    A plot worthy of description in "An Officer Can..."
    This is the very case when the fleet was not disgraced.
    1. +15
      1 November 2025 11: 18
      "We'll drink it all away, but we won't disgrace the navy!" was a very powerful motivator in the service back then. drinks
  7. Fat
    +18
    1 November 2025 07: 29
    A magnificent essay. Thank you, Vasily.
    1. +19
      1 November 2025 11: 20
      thanks for the compliment lol
      If, out of fear, people start sharing some of the scenes from their lives, many impressionable people will feel sick... soldier
      1. +5
        1 November 2025 12: 25
        Quote: Vasily_Ostrovsky
        If, out of fear, people start sharing some of the scenes from their lives, many impressionable people will feel sick...

        This is exactly drinks! Great article, author, thank you. I supported him as best I could. request
        1. +13
          1 November 2025 12: 29
          And thank you drinks

          I tried, but unfortunately I didn't catch all the mistakes...
          I'll be more thorough with my next posts, if VO lets me through... I need to get used to the text editor that's built into the posts...
          1. +8
            1 November 2025 12: 31
            Quote: Vasily_Ostrovsky
            I tried, but unfortunately I didn't catch all the mistakes...

            It's not scary, even like this it turned out to be perfectly readable.
            Quote: Vasily_Ostrovsky
            To the next publications

            Please continue by all means hi
            1. +17
              1 November 2025 12: 33
              I'm already rustling...
              The first success inspires...
              drinks
              1. +4
                1 November 2025 12: 38
                Quote: Vasily_Ostrovsky
                I'm already rustling...

                good
      2. 0
        9 November 2025 19: 58
        Quote: Vasily_Ostrovsky
        If, out of fear, people start sharing some of the scenes from their lives, many impressionable people will feel sick...

        Yeah...
  8. +14
    1 November 2025 08: 25
    Thanks to the author for a good story hi
    1. +10
      1 November 2025 10: 35
      Ah, how many such untold feats there are... Which only those who took part know about... And even those are often no longer there... hi
      1. +17
        1 November 2025 11: 25
        Quote from: dmi.pris1
        Ah, how many such untold feats there are... Which only those who took part know about... And even those are often no longer there... hi


        My release has already lost more than 50%... what was said at the get-togethers cannot be published, it will be scary...
    2. +17
      1 November 2025 11: 23
      Thanks for your support belay
      Literature among people who served their Motherland does not come from talent, but from the very circumstances of service. wassat
      How can you tell such stories without being obscene? That's why you end up doing it this way, trying to wrap all the bleeps in an acceptable form. good
      1. +6
        1 November 2025 19: 16
        Quote: Vasily_Ostrovsky
        How can you tell such stories without being obscene? That's why you end up doing it this way, trying to wrap all the bleeps in an acceptable form.

        The expression turned out great. Admirals of the Moscow River ! good
        No swearing, but everything is clear.
        And I think that they themselves, in their own circle, did not neglect honorary “badges”! am
        1. +4
          1 November 2025 19: 21
          So what are they talking about, admirals? The Moskva River, that's a fact... They've long forgotten what a latrine smells like, and the difference between a forecastle and a poop deck... that's how it was, and that's how it is, the cruiser Moskva being a case in point...
          I can't say anything about any awards in the Navy... It's more likely there weren't any—there was no explosion, after all, the submarine lost power on the inter-base crossing, so what? Routine...
          1. The comment was deleted.
          2. +2
            1 November 2025 20: 53
            Quote: Vasily_Ostrovsky
            I can't say anything about any awards in the Navy... It's more likely there weren't any—there was no explosion, after all, the submarine lost power on the inter-base crossing, so what? Routine...

            Isn't it a common occurrence to escort a disabled submarine back to port during a storm without casualties? As you describe, they issued recommendations and orders as best they could, and everything went smoothly. So, alas, they couldn't have avoided issuing an internal, classified awards order.
            1. +4
              1 November 2025 21: 04
              Well, if a headquarters was set up at the General Staff of the Navy to rescue the submarine, then perhaps the admirals of the Moscow River drilled holes in their jackets, but I have no such information.
              Gorshkov evaluated their "recommendations," but for awarding orders, materials are still prepared and passed through the Central Committee, just as they are now, through the Presidential Administration... so I think they could have been given something under a different guise, but I don't know...
              1. +2
                1 November 2025 21: 54
                Quote: Vasily_Ostrovsky
                Gorshkov assessed their "recommendations"

                Another question: How could Gorshkov have assessed this incident, given that it occurred in November 1988, and Sergei Georgievich held the post of Commander-in-Chief of the Navy and Deputy Minister of Defense of the USSR until 1985? In 88, he was indeed a member of the CPSU Central Committee...
                1. +6
                  1 November 2025 22: 04
                  You know, you really need to fact-check what you write... Gorshkov died in May 1988...
                  Why do I remember Gorshkov as the one leading the operation? Perhaps there's a mistake in the year of the incident? I'll have to look into this further...
                  All conversations with the General Staff of the Navy over the KV ZAS were broadcast over the loudspeaker to the Main Control Center, and the entire bridge crew could hear them. After Dudkin cursed some admiral, the loudspeaker was turned off. The person speaking on behalf of the General Staff of the Navy specifically stated that the Commander-in-Chief of the Navy was in charge of the operation. Gorshkov's name was mentioned, and someone on the bridge said, "Now it's all over..."
                  I'll have to figure out what's wrong here... either the narrator forgot, or the year isn't 1988, but, say, 1987? Let me clarify, it's not right to throw around names for the sake of a good story...
  9. +25
    1 November 2025 08: 53
    I join in expressing gratitude to the author...
    I got carried away reading it...memories came flooding back...
    Thank...
    1. +17
      1 November 2025 11: 26
      Thank you, I will try, another note is being prepared wassat
  10. +20
    1 November 2025 09: 06
    I recognize the Navy. A critical situation and admirals incapable of anything useful, or even, rather, of doing nothing but stupid things. If it weren't for the professionalism and restraint of the men in tow, then...
    1. +15
      1 November 2025 11: 28
      The sailors on both sides are handsome. laughing
      They did everything without any pomp and circumstance, working like men in the field:
      "Is it hard? But whoever has it easy needs saving." feel
  11. +20
    1 November 2025 09: 20
    Chernobyl was avoided in the Far East thanks to the professionalism, dedication and luck of the crews, in violation of all instructions.

    What if the steel cable had snapped? Had the tugboat capsized? Everything hung by a thread.

    And how many of these maybes slipped through and remained unknown?

    The author is well done.
    1. +17
      1 November 2025 11: 33
      Were there any options? Of course not...
      Although they could have used the instructions as a cover and reported the impossibility of towing (and even just connecting the ends was impossible) in such conditions...
      And what would the outcome be? The sinking of a submarine, Chernobyl 2,0... then a search operation, a funeral, an investigation... no one found guilty...
      Would the PSKR crew smoke cigarettes without any problem? That's impossible...
      Regarding the potential for negative outcomes (a broken cable, etc.)... when a crew has such commanders, the sailors and petty officers themselves have the necessary skills. Hence the confidence in success. good
      1. +5
        1 November 2025 17: 17
        You can think a thought. Or you can do something.
        They did the job here. Perish yourself and rescue your comrade.
        Rocks, not people. Learning about such feats makes me want to develop myself to match them. So I won't feel ashamed of myself next to people capable of such feats.
        Thank you for telling this story.
        1. +9
          1 November 2025 17: 22
          Today the guys are no worse, it’s a question of setting goals.
          As the task is set, so it is carried out...

          My relative in '22 didn't flinch, he completed the task assigned to him... Eternal memory...
          1. +2
            2 November 2025 09: 33
            Everlasting memory.

            Russia's greatest weakness compared to the USSR is its weak patriotic education. Young people need to know both heroic acts of sacrifice and the routine, everyday feats of hard, risky, but necessary labor.
            It must mean something to understand that this is possible.
            1. +4
              2 November 2025 09: 40
              It's right.
              Being a patriot became "out of fashion" even under Gorbachev. Remember how officers were vilified, the army was called parasites, the military profession - stupid idiots, and so on and so forth. Remembering this only raises the pressure... am
              Today we came to our senses... The authorities always remember when their existence is threatened, this has been the case throughout human history, it is a given...
              We will live on. This too shall pass... (inscription on King Solomon's ring) drinks
  12. +17
    1 November 2025 09: 21
    The last few days have been truly delightful with some excellent articles about submarine navigation. Thank you!
    1. +17
      1 November 2025 11: 34
      It's a shame laughing
      He praised the sailors and border guards drinks
      And submariners, of course hi
      1. +5
        1 November 2025 12: 19
        Apparently, this is my amateur deviation. laughing
        For me, the material about submarine towing is about submarines. Yes, it was incorrect on my part, I apologize. feel
        1. +15
          1 November 2025 12: 24
          No offense, of course. laughing

          For the submariners, it was truly terrifying—on the surface, in a heavy storm, doing anything on the upper deck was 100% suicide. When a wave engulfed them, the border guards were terrified too—after all, rescue in such a stormy sea, almost in winter (late November in the Sea of ​​Okhotsk is nothing like Sochi...), was basically impossible. If even one had broken loose, it would have been a total loss.
  13. +12
    1 November 2025 10: 01
    There are no words! People like these are not made into nails, but crowbars! You can’t bend them!
    1. +17
      1 November 2025 11: 42
      Thanks, but I'd rather not. smile What haven't they done to us in our time? laughing
      It’s better to sit quietly on the porch, being careful, by yourself and with your comrades drinks
  14. +12
    1 November 2025 10: 54
    Thanks to the Author!!! I'm not a Navy man at all, but after reading it, I felt my shoulders straighten out, as if it were about me too... Soviet officers are like that tow rope, even stronger! Sincerely,
    1. +15
      1 November 2025 12: 12
      And thank you feel

      As the classic said: "Well, not everyone in the village is a fool!" laughing Of course, there were all sorts of things, but it wasn't all hopeless service. And of course, everything depends on the commander: a competent, caring, and intelligent commander is 200% of success. His unit will always do what is fundamentally impossible. drinks
  15. +6
    1 November 2025 11: 08
    Respect and admiration to the author good
    1. +7
      1 November 2025 12: 14
      Thank you drinks
      We are happy to assist you, Your Excellency! soldier
  16. +6
    1 November 2025 11: 33
    Cool! Iron men! Glory to the nameless heroes! They've always been and continue to be the foundation of Russia.
    1. +7
      1 November 2025 12: 15
      That's exactly it, and it's still the same today. hi
  17. +6
    1 November 2025 13: 14
    What a wonderful article good ,read in one breath Yes Auto RU hi
    1. +11
      1 November 2025 13: 19
      Thank you love
      I'm already starting to feel shy... feel
      This means that soon the critics will come and the slippers will fly belay
      1. +9
        1 November 2025 13: 35
        Quote: Vasily_Ostrovsky
        This means that soon the critics will come and the slippers will fly

        (taking out from under the table an enema for half a bucket of turpentine with gramophone needles) Critics, you say... Well, let them try fellow
        1. +9
          1 November 2025 13: 52
          Yeah, we had a similar saying back then: "I'll give you an enema mixed with gramophone needles."
          Just like in my youth, there was a smell of trouble laughing
          1. +3
            1 November 2025 14: 03
            Quote: Vasily_Ostrovsky
            I'll give you an enema mixed with gramophone needles.

            I haven't heard this version. laughing hi
            1. +10
              1 November 2025 14: 07
              The Russian language is rich laughing
              And as for naval folklore... wassat drinks
      2. +6
        1 November 2025 21: 42
        At noon, an American P-3 Orion showed up and made life difficult for us.
        The topic about the Americans is not covered. sad narrate winkedif possible. Yes
        1. +6
          1 November 2025 21: 51
          Yes, I would love to, but I couldn’t find anything on American resources about this year, it was like a cow licked it up...
          And the Americans love to entertain themselves with confrontations with the Soviet fleet - they can't feed themselves with bread... Maybe after digging deeper into the net, I'll find some - I'll definitely add it, especially since there are already some for other episodes... hi
      3. +2
        2 November 2025 04: 14
        Quote: Vasily_Ostrovsky
        Thank you love
        I'm already starting to feel shy... feel
        This means that soon the critics will come and the slippers will fly belay

        I don't know about critics and so on. I'm simply speechless! Perhaps the closest approximation is M. Yu. Lermontov: "Tell me, uncle... there were battles, and they say what kind!" The ellipsis is deliberate.
        1. +3
          2 November 2025 09: 08
          Thanks for your kind words feel
          But this can also ruin the author - suddenly he (the author) imagines himself to be really super-duper great... and all the beer has already been drunk... wassat
          You need to be in good shape, otherwise the drive will disappear... drinks
  18. +7
    1 November 2025 13: 22
    Quote: Vasily_Ostrovsky
    When a crew has such commanders, the sailors and petty officers themselves have sharpened hands as they should be.

    As I.V. Stalin said, "Personnel is everything." The human factor is crucial. Sometimes positively, sometimes negatively. There are plenty of examples of both. In this case, the sailors demonstrated pure heroism!
    1. +14
      1 November 2025 13: 54
      About 40 years ago, a personnel officer told me in response to my statement: “Personnel decide everything!” – I was trying to make a move on him. wassat

      And he cut me off sternly: “The personnel decided – and that’s it!”
      I immediately got all excited and started running around... wassat
  19. +2
    1 November 2025 13: 59
    and they awarded it on Border Guard Day, that is, 8 months later, and not even on February 23rd.
    February 23rd was Soviet and Navy Day back then. So even we in the Air Force didn't really consider it a holiday. August 18th, yes, or at least the third Sunday in August...
    1. +13
      1 November 2025 14: 05
      Actually, the best holiday was March 8th! And not because you thought... wassat

      This is the only holiday when there is no ceremonial flag raising on ships, which means that the officers and their families are at home, and the personnel sleep peacefully and go about their business without a forced "Hurrah" soldier
      1. +3
        1 November 2025 18: 53
        [quote=Vasily_Ostrovsky]Actually, the best holiday was March 8th! And not because you thought...
        [/quoI didn't think I know!! March 8th is the only holiday in honor of which there was no "ceremonial" formation.. But on December 31st at 4:00 PM or 8:00 PM, this is according to the description coefficient of the leadership staff, a formation was mandatory and a check of personnel for insufficient hangover, or for insufficient drinking who was free from duty during this period. laughing drinks
        1. +5
          1 November 2025 19: 53
          No, God spared us from such horror. drinks soldier
        2. +5
          1 November 2025 19: 59
          Quote: Fitter65
          personnel who were free from duty during this period were lined up and checked for insufficient hangover or insufficient drinking

          The boatswain said:
          "It's better to overeat than not get enough sleep!"
          Golden words ... wassat
      2. +5
        1 November 2025 19: 50
        Where did you serve???
        March 8, 1992, aboard the missile cruiser Marshal Ustinov. "Comrades, Severomorsk sailors!!! Congratulations on International Women's Day!!" All of Severomorsk heard!
        At Kirov, they congratulated us quietly, like, "Happy holiday, comrades."
        1. +3
          1 November 2025 19: 55
          This has never happened in the Ministry of Emergency Situations, I haven't heard of it - and I have a lot of friends from there. good

          I sincerely sympathize drinks
    2. +2
      2 November 2025 04: 19
      Quote: Fitter65
      and they awarded it on Border Guard Day, that is, 8 months later, and not even on February 23rd.
      February 23rd was Soviet and Navy Day back then. So even we in the Air Force didn't really consider it a holiday. August 18th, yes, or at least the third Sunday in August...

      August 18th is 1979, later than the third Sunday. Although the "old" flight crew celebrates August 18th! Stalin's Falcons!
  20. +3
    1 November 2025 14: 10
    It's strange that in the situation described, the submarine's emergency reserve wasn't lowered, the water supply/flooding system wasn't activated, and it had to be powered by an electrical cable. And the incident wasn't made public.
    1. +11
      1 November 2025 14: 42
      What the reactor crews did and how they did it is unknown to us. However, a reactor, although a large vessel, is a very special one. If a vessel is heated without a heat sink, its bottom will simply melt. This is precisely what happened in reality: if the border guards and submariners hadn't done what was prohibited—injecting water into the primary circuit that hadn't been prepared specifically according to nuclear safety regulations—the vessel (the reactor) would have melted the bottom beneath the reactor and fallen into the sea, with precisely the consequences described in the article.

      If the worst-case scenario had happened, everyone would have forgotten about Chernobyl long ago, and it would have been a terrible nuclear disaster, not a prevented accident...

      And there would be no economic activity in the Sea of ​​Okhotsk for a very long time... hi
      1. +1
        1 November 2025 18: 00
        How was that which never was...
        good
      2. +1
        1 November 2025 18: 42
        Если что- я про призрак ядерного апокалипсиса. Кстати- https://forum.pogranichnik.ru/topic/809-1-%D0%B4%D0%B8%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B7%D0%B8%D1%8F-%D0%BF%D1%81%D0%BA%D1%80-%D0%BF%D0%B5%D1%82%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%BF%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%B2%D1%81%D0%BA-%D0%BA%D0%B0%D0%BC%D1%87%D0%B0%D1%82%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%B9-%D0%B2%D1%87-2376/?do=findComment&comment=297350
        1. +6
          1 November 2025 19: 03
          It's not rocket science, hi
          The plot of this story was already being told by a narrator 17 years ago. My task was to make it readable, with the details known to the source, to coax a photo from the owner with the right to publish, to interview other participants in the story, and to check for errors (and there were some).

          The publication was, of course, facilitated by the article series about submarine accidents on the website and B. Kuznetsov's book "She Sank..." about the Kursk submarine. I think this needs to be published. lol
          As for a nuclear apocalypse... We've become complacent over the past few decades... there's no guarantee against such a disaster...
          Has much changed now? I don't think so... there aren't enough rescue equipment. In a similar accident as in my article, who would get there in time? On a stick?
          So the point of this article is not only to pay tribute to the sailors of that time, but also to remind those of today...
          Something like this ... soldier
          1. +2
            1 November 2025 19: 28
            I could remember hearing from a neighboring company about a power outage due to simple carelessness, as is usually the case, and after the huge mess there was nowhere to go and, like, the show must go on!
            1. +6
              1 November 2025 19: 47
              Well, orders about accidents and incidents were regularly communicated, not all of them are described in print, although it would be useful - today's guys have very little knowledge of the post-war history of the armed forces... especially accidents, I know this firsthand...
              For some reason, everyone thinks that life is only for today. laughing
      3. +1
        2 November 2025 00: 34
        The mass of the Chernobyl reactor and a submarine reactor cannot be compared. Chernobyl is an order of magnitude larger.
        1. +6
          2 November 2025 00: 45
          Of course, Chernobyl is bigger. But it's in a specially constructed, enormous building with super-duper (just like Trump, heh-heh) concrete and metal protection.

          On a submarine, if the reactor were to fall through the bottom of the hull, it would be completely unprotected, and the thermal explosion (which must be separated from the nuclear explosion; a nuclear explosion on a submarine is impossible in principle due to the reactor's fault) would be colossal...
          Those interested can familiarize themselves with specialized literature on this topic; the article format is not technical.
          A massive explosion, accompanied by rising vapors of radioactive debris and other contaminants, would render the Sea of ​​Okhotsk unfit for human use, with all the ensuing consequences for a vast number of cities and other areas...
          So, it's not about a fight for supremacy... Today, Ukrainian idiots are trying to play these games within the framework of a "dirty bomb"; they've completely lost the fear of God...
          1. 0
            2 November 2025 00: 54
            The volume of the Sea of ​​Okhotsk is 1,6 million cubic kilometers. The mass of water is 1600 trillion tons. Even if a hundred reactors were dispersed, the increase in background radiation would be undetectable.
            1. +3
              2 November 2025 08: 53
              I've heard this somewhere before...
              Quote: stankow
              The volume of the Sea of ​​Okhotsk is 1,6 million cubic kilometers. The mass of water is 1600 trillion tons. Even if a hundred reactors were dispersed, the increase in background radiation would be undetectable.


              Before the war, the Leningrad Zoo had only one elephant. Hitting it with a bomb, by the theory of probability, is completely impossible.
              So, the bomb hit it, the elephant died....
              You can also calculate the number of decaying uranium nuclei per trillion tons, and it turns out that there are enough of them to pollute the entire sea...
              Such cases laughing
              1. 0
                2 November 2025 10: 52
                Easily. The uranium content in seawater is 3 parts per billion. That means there are 4.8 million tons of uranium in the Sea of ​​Okhotsk, even without all that. And then there's thorium and other things... So, a few extra tons, whatever, won't change the radiation situation. But that'll take a few days, until it disperses. And the crews would have suffered. Good thing they fought back like men!
                1. +3
                  2 November 2025 14: 55
                  You know, you're in the wrong place...
                  I hope that your conclusions are based on experience in managing and commanding large military units, or crews, calculations, or teams.

                  If this is not the case, then any reasoning is simply, excuse me, the reasoning of someone passing by...

                  It's like if I were giving advice to a baker... I love bread, but I don't understand how it turns out exactly like that - delicious, airy, and fabulous...

                  I remember a baker, around 1968-1969, Misha Kostomarov... With a clearly damaged nose, like a boxer's, he was a baker in a border detachment... By the time you got home, you'd eat half a loaf, and not from hunger, but simply because you couldn't resist...

                  How did he do it? I don't know... And when he retired, the new baker didn't bake such bread... Yeast, salt, flour, oven - everything was the same... But the bread - no, something was missing...
                  1. +2
                    2 November 2025 20: 38
                    Is this reply to me, or are the posts in this thread mixed up? If it's to me, then I have a semi-higher military education and exams in radiation and chemical protection. And during Chernobyl, I was responsible for "civil defense" for a small team of 300 people at the Academy of Sciences. I had to explain it to them, even with detailed calculations... Scientists, what can you do with it? You can't explain it to them with just figurative comparisons. wink
          2. +1
            2 November 2025 15: 53
            On a nuclear submarine, a reactor falls through the bottom of the hull

            Stop trying to scare people, especially comparing the Chernobyl RBMK reactor (which, by the way, has been operating at other nuclear power plants without problems for over half a century) with marine reactors. They have completely different designs, and the marine reactor doesn't rest on the seafloor. After Chernobyl and Chazhma (where carelessness and luck played a role), reactor emergencies were so feared that some particularly gifted individuals took advantage of this fear for their own gain.
            1. +2
              2 November 2025 16: 10
              Why should I scare the pumpkin latte lovers? They'll die of fear that there might not be any pumpkin latte at 9:30 a.m.

              Let me ask you: Did you command anything in the navy or do you have any real connection to the nuclear power plant?

              Maybe I should read something... in my field... and I'll refresh my knowledge... we're falling behind science, and AI has already appeared...

              Heh-heh... AI... I wrote software for it back in the late 70s - early 80s...

              Only back then it was called something else: "Ensuring the survivability of a surface ship and submarine when receiving combat and emergency damage"...

              So, all this bravura talk about AI developments here and there—I'm laughing... Where were you guys 40 years ago? Just dig up some old papers, you'll save a lot of money...
              1. 0
                2 November 2025 16: 23
                Did you command anything in the navy or do you have any real connection to the nuclear power plant?

                No. I was simply involved in ship repairs at the time, which is why I was more familiar with potentially hazardous work than with life safety.
                1. +3
                  2 November 2025 16: 50
                  I have no complaints now. From the perspective of an outside observer/ship repair specialist, everything is perfectly adequate.

                  Just a quick aside: often after production, even while participating in acceptance testing, I had to repair the mechanisms... There was a case where a sump pump valve was TURNT along the threads—what kind of force did that require? The valve wheel (with a diameter of approximately 25-30 mm) was turning because the threads were simply stripped (an enormous amount of force!)
                  But the Soviet worker managed it!

                  To be fair, the sailors also had their fun... There were all sorts of things...
                  1. +1
                    2 November 2025 17: 03
                    Everyone was ...

                    That's true. Regarding the fan, it's more likely that it's seized up, stuck, jammed, and they've been trying to unscrew it with whatever tools they have, but in the wrong direction. I've seen that happen. But in general, in today's reality, it's like in that poem -
                    Anything can happen and everything can happen,
                    But that just can't be,
                    Which can't happen at all,
                    And that might cost money.
                    1. +3
                      2 November 2025 17: 14
                      Quote: Lynnot
                      That's true. Regarding the fan, it's more likely that it's become stuck, seized, or jammed, and they're trying to unscrew it with whatever they have, but in the wrong direction.

                      Exactly, that's how we understood it. wassat
                      I had it sewn by a specialist for a liter and they exchanged it for a working one... the villain... laughing

                      That ship repair was poor, but reasonable—all the issues could have been resolved. I wish that were the case now...
                  2. +1
                    2 November 2025 18: 26
                    To be fair, the sailors also gave it a go...

                    There was an incident when the "old-timers" delayed the submarine's release from repairs. They were afraid the demobilization would fail, and besides, it was easier during repairs. Literally before the delivery, they "discovered" a leak. It was unclear what or where it was coming from, but it was dripping in the sub-unit... And the leaking source was the reactor and its piping. They searched for two months, gathered all the experts, brought a unique experimental leak detection apparatus from Moscow (a cool thing, they tested all the lines with it) - they found nothing, but the leak continued... It turned out that water had been added to the backfill of the liquid fuel tank where the reactor is located through a hole from a hose while the leak detection apparatus was turned off and there were no specialists on the submarine. This coincidence caught their attention. What happened to those smart guys, I don't know, but they definitely missed the mark with the demobilization.
                    1. +2
                      2 November 2025 18: 51
                      A sailor's ingenuity is unmatched by anyone, that's a fact. bully

                      And they bent over the plant, the command, and the finances...

                      I wish I could have spanked them, but it was impossible... But what experience we all gained! A real treasure trove! drinks
                      1. +1
                        2 November 2025 18: 54
                        Take it if you're interested. hi
    2. 0
      1 November 2025 14: 51
      It is strange that in the situation described, the boat's water supply system was not activated.

      You've confused the makeup-purge system with the flushing system. That's the first point. Secondly, can you describe the presence of these systems and their design in the VM reactors?
      1. +1
        1 November 2025 17: 45
        You have mixed up the make-up-purge system and the bleed system.

        No, I didn't mix them up. The reactor's water-cooled water make-up and flushing system is the same as on the submarine in question. Make-up is the replenishment of coolant during normal operation and during the initial stages of an emergency. Flushing is the injection of a large volume of water for cooling after the pressure has dropped.
  21. +7
    1 November 2025 14: 28
    Thank you to the author, I enjoyed reading it. Keep writing, you're doing a great job. The staff used to be excellent, both in terms of the theoretical foundation and the application of practical skills "not according to the manual."
    1. +8
      1 November 2025 14: 44
      Thanks for your kind words drinks
      Rustling... Yes
  22. +6
    1 November 2025 14: 49
    A huge thank you to the author for this wonderful material! The story is interesting, the writing style and photos are excellent!
    On the first day of November 2025, you can bet on which media outlet will be the first to report on the Khabarovsk submarine.
    1. +7
      1 November 2025 15: 10
      Thank you, a kind word is appreciated even by the cat. tongue
  23. +9
    1 November 2025 15: 45
    Yeah, damn, that's a lot! You're towing a car here with a soft hitch—you're drenched in sweat, and such a stupid thing, especially in a 6-point storm, and under radiation time pressure... hi
    The worst part is for the commander and the first mate, the psychological pressure is terrible, in case of failure they would be held accountable in full. Yes
    1. +11
      1 November 2025 16: 19
      Quote: Arzt
      The worst part is for the commander and the first mate, the psychological pressure is terrible, in case of failure they would be held accountable in full.


      Don't doubt it, they answered.... bully
      Since the mooring lines, which had been torn to pieces during towing in stormy weather, had become unusable, and their service life was only 3 years, and there was almost nothing to moor with, then upon arrival at the base, I began running around the STI (skipper-technical equipment) service and trying to get new ones in exchange.
      Of course, it was sent, but three cheerful letters - the deadlines did not pass, there was no order to maintain the database, there are no grounds for write-off.
      Moreover, they tried to collect the cost of the torn "ropes" from him - more than 2000 rubles... he barely fought them off, poor guy. am
      I didn't include this fact in the article, it was already too long...
      1. +5
        1 November 2025 19: 09
        What, there was no way to even write it off? What a disaster. Even if it had to be done through that lousy commission.
        Lately, I've been telling everyone that the USSR perished from lies. The ideology and the people behind it didn't anticipate any problems. "Everything is fine, beautiful marquise."
        1. +6
          1 November 2025 19: 16
          Quote: MCmaximus
          What, there was no way to even write it off? What a disaster. Even if it had to be done through that lousy commission.

          It's possible. But at the perpetrator's expense. There was no order to conduct a combat mission, that's the absolute truth. No one considered the crew heroes—if that didn't happen, then what's the point of claiming special treatment? And property must serve its useful life and be stored, including worn-out items...

          Presenting encrypted telegrams to confirm the completion of a combat mission would land you in jail for violating and disclosing military secrets, and if it was through certain encrypted documents, then state secrets as well... Then they started to scrutinize the first mate for those unfortunate tugboats and mooring lines, even going so far as to collect funds to pay for lost property... thank God, it all worked out...

          None of this ever happened. And it still doesn't... am
          So, for a canister of "awl" we got hold of a couple of mooring lines, and that was the end of it.
          1. +1
            1 November 2025 19: 26
            Yeah, right. When I joined the army, I immediately realized it wasn't for me. Smart as hell. In civilian life, you still have some understanding of the situation. You have to get things done, not look for the guilty. First, the plant needs to run. And then find the guilty. For some reason, our bosses don't separate themselves from their subordinates. Ultimately, let the others share. And then everyone writes off the little things that were torn. On orders from the boss. Or not have some lousy ropes to tie a tugboat to the pier? Ropes = ship. Two kopecks against millions.
            This is all sad.
            It reminds me of a joke: A man is being prepared for surgery. He's worried about who will be doing the cutting, etc. They tell him: we have a good intern, we'll assign him the job. Man: what if he cuts me? He: we'll give him a bad grade.
            1. +5
              1 November 2025 19: 35
              Quote: MCmaximus
              When I joined the army, I immediately realized it wasn't for me. I'm incredibly smart.

              It's a shame.
              There are fools everywhere. And there are even more of them in civilian life, simply statistically.
              Stupid people don't do anything, but they do spoil the weather, that's a fact...
              While they are still promoting democracy and holding meetings on the ship, the ship will sink and burn at the same time, and those millions will not be there...

              There's no harm in laughing at yourself; it guarantees your health. But when outsiders start laughing, it's like in the late '80s and early '90s—the officers were forced to wear civilian clothes to defend the Motherland... And all around, fueled by the scoundrels at Ogonyok and the Medvedevs, stupid people jeered...

              And now we have to pay for all this with the lives of our guys in the war... am
              1. +1
                1 November 2025 19: 39
                So it feels like playing with soldiers is so captivating that it drains the brain of admirals and generals. The army and navy must obey without question. But still, when a commander gives an order, you have to think a little. And after the events, you have to think for a long time before acting. And the thinking part of the brain dies. The cap, apparently, is bruising your head.
                1. +5
                  1 November 2025 19: 41
                  Quote: MCmaximus
                  So, it feels like playing with soldiers is so captivating that it drains your brain of admiral and general ranks.

                  This happens to any manager, and in civilian life it's even faster - there are no restrictions...
                  1. +3
                    1 November 2025 20: 07
                    Anything can happen. Only in civilian life can a subordinate simply tell their superior to do what he or she wants. And often, subordinates are more valuable to their superiors than they are to them.
                    1. +9
                      1 November 2025 20: 11
                      Let me disagree!
                      Quote: MCmaximus
                      Only in civilian life can a subordinate simply send his superior where he should go.


                      The commander talks about military democracy - this is "in the Gorbachev era":
                      "Senior lieutenant! We have the most democratic service! It's when the commander tells you to go to hell, and you turn around and go wherever you want! And God forbid, the wrong way!..." bully
                  2. Fat
                    +4
                    1 November 2025 20: 40
                    Quote: Vasily_Ostrovsky
                    This happens to any manager, and in civilian life it's even faster - there are no restrictions...

                    A person working in any hierarchical system is promoted until they reach a position where they are no longer capable of fulfilling their responsibilities, i.e., they are deemed incompetent. The employee will be "stuck" in this position until they leave the system (i.e., quit, die, or retire). The Peter Principle.
                    1. +6
                      1 November 2025 20: 58
                      It's like that... in an academic sense...
                      In fact, usually "getting stuck" occurs, depending on the circumstances, at level +1 or +2...
                      History knows many cases even with +infinity...
                      So where do you put a fool? At this point, he's already causing harm with his stupidity, and he's actually being "promoted," often forward and upward...

                      Let me give you a sad example:
                      They sent an officer from the "west" to the "east." He may have successfully helmed the Project 205P, a former missile boat, in the Baltic. They needed height and rank... The Project 205P's ceiling is captry, and there's nowhere else to go; competition is fierce.
                      So he went to the Far East for rank and seniority. And his friend, too, went there as a high-ranking official, which is no small feat.
                      So they got this captain promoted to the position of first mate of the ship of the 1st rank (she is also a captain) and then moved on to the position of ship commander of the 2nd rank (staff - captain two) for a star and seniority.
                      It's like - well, go ahead, do it!
                      Oh no... this new commander—believe it or not, he was afraid of the ship... When appointed commander, you're given six months to pass the certification test for independent command of a ship, the maximum period being one year. After that, if the officer fails the certification test, they're demoted...

                      So this guy couldn't pass his certification for three (three) years, couldn't moor, couldn't organize damage control, ran to his cabin in stormy weather right in front of the crew, and wouldn't even let the ZAS radio operator in...
                      So what? Demoted? No way...
                      The command openly told him: "Get out of sight, you'll wreck the ship," and other people moored... and so on, describing this incident is simply hair-raising...
                      And this hopeless fellow served, after about 5 years he somehow learned to steer a ship with great difficulty... and then all sorts of layoffs happened, his service length approached, and so on...
                      And how many firewood did this pseudo-commander break, how many people went grey on the bridge - and where is the Peter Principle here?
                      I don't want to undermine the ship's commander's authority as an institution; after all, such a misunderstanding is a truly rare occurrence... but there was one, I won't reveal his name, he has children, so why should they be ashamed...
                      1. Fat
                        +5
                        1 November 2025 21: 21
                        It is also true academically.
                        Rarely is anyone willing to honestly admit to themselves, much less to others (management, subordinates, family, friends), that they "don't cut it." Even rarer is someone willing to take any action about it that would lead to a reduction in status, income, etc.
                        The boss who promoted an employee who turned out to be incompetent is also reluctant to admit his mistake and does everything he can to shield him.
                        It is not possible to return everything to the way it was, because the incompetent person’s previous position has already been occupied by a new employee.
                        Sometimes, an employee who has reached a level of incompetence in their current position causes so much damage, and their dismissal would create so many problems, that a special sinecure position is created for them. While they're formally promoted again, in reality, their authority is curtailed. Peter calls this a "sideways pass."
                        With respect.
                      2. +5
                        1 November 2025 21: 30
                        And I'm talking about this...
                        It's just a shame that our brigade-division-naval leaders are unwilling to study, much less follow, command theory. That's all there is to it.

                        One day, while on duty, I was receiving a senior officer. He asked, looking at the notebooks on the table with calculations and diagrams: "What's this?" I answered: "A research paper, I'm writing this..." He then said: "I need a duty officer for the brigade, not a scientist! Put this away..."
                        Well, he's right - there's no point in doing extraneous things while on duty. wassat
                        But then, whenever something happened, he would say: We write scientific papers here! No nonsense!
                      3. +2
                        2 November 2025 04: 36
                        Quote: Vasily_Ostrovsky
                        Vasily_Ostrovsky
                        +4
                        Yesterday, 20: 58
                        New

                        There was a similar case, but in aviation.
      2. +2
        1 November 2025 19: 45
        Don't doubt it, they answered... bully
        Since the mooring lines, which had been torn to pieces during towing in stormy weather, had become unusable, and their service life was only 3 years, and there was almost nothing to moor with, then upon arrival at the base, I began running around the STI (skipper-technical equipment) service and trying to get new ones in exchange.
        Of course, it was sent, but three cheerful letters - the deadlines did not pass, there was no order to maintain the database, there are no grounds for write-off.
        Moreover, they tried to collect the cost of the torn "ropes" from him - more than 2000 rubles... he barely fought them off, poor guy.
        I didn't include this fact in the article, it was already too long...

        It's all just brutal. They essentially saved a multi-million dollar boat and couldn't write off the lousy mooring lines. Different agencies, that's probably why.

        And again, knowing the mindset of the bosses - what's the big deal, they're a tugboat, so that's what they're supposed to do)). And they broke the mooring lines out of stupidity))).

        And by doses. If you had radiation, they probably took a fair amount on the boat itself.
        1. +8
          1 November 2025 19: 52
          Quote: Arzt
          And by doses. If you had radiation, they probably took a fair amount on the boat itself.

          Not necessarily - the radioactive emissions could be from diesel exhaust, bilge water, or anything else that the boat discharged, either explicitly or implicitly. winked
          This is a rotten thing: the pot is heating up, it's already above the threshold, and it's not cooling down... So what, are they going to observe nuclear safety there? And where did the water from the primary circuit go? It didn't just "drown," after all... That's why it's emitting radiation on the surface...
          But in my life I have only seen radiation power greater than 1 Roentgen per hour on devices twice... so I believe it...
          1. +6
            1 November 2025 20: 03
            But in my life I have only seen radiation power greater than 1 Roentgen per hour on devices twice... so I believe it...

            Well then, we'll wait for the story about the second case. (Or the first. laughing ) Write, you have a good style, otherwise I’m tired of the local madness...
            1. +6
              1 November 2025 20: 08
              Yeah, right... I promised so much - now I need to work and earn my keep... feel
  24. +5
    1 November 2025 16: 28
    A very good article, humane. But, alas, with a predictable ending.
    1. +7
      1 November 2025 16: 47
      Thanks for your kind words wink

      As the narrator says, “It’s a pity about the Order, of course, it would have looked good No. ...but whatever, the main thing is that people were saved." soldier
      1. +3
        1 November 2025 16: 55
        Perhaps they would have awarded them medals if the story had become public.
        Thank you, Vasily! It was interesting.
        1. +8
          1 November 2025 17: 16
          Quote: 3x3zsave
          Perhaps they would have awarded them medals if the story had become public.

          It couldn't get publicity - there were different, in some ways competing departments: the Navy, the brainchild of Gorshkov, and the KGB, the beloved child of Yuri Vladimirovich Andropov, who had passed away by that time...
          And so the KGB guys come to the awards department of the CPSU Central Committee: give medals to our guys, they saved the Navy, they prevented a nuclear disaster...

          The Central Committee raised an eyebrow: What disaster? The Navy is doing just fine!
          Bring the Navy here! What are you hiding? Accidents?
          The Navy replies: "Everything's fine, we're for the environment and against radiation, just as you, great leader Father Gorbachev, teach us."
          Summary:
          Everyone sit quietly and don’t interfere with our peaceful policy!

          Good thing they didn't put me in jail...
          1. +5
            1 November 2025 17: 25
            Good thing they didn't put me in jail...
            In general: "you can't become famous for good deeds"...
            1. +4
              1 November 2025 17: 31
              Let's take that into account...
              The article about good deeds is now coming to an end; perhaps it will be published...
              Overjoyed - from the first publication love
              1. +5
                1 November 2025 17: 36
                maybe it will be published...
                It will be, no doubt about it. The resource, uh, is having some trouble with clickable content, and your debut already has almost 9 views.
                Sorry, it's already past nine.
                1. +8
                  1 November 2025 17: 40
                  I didn’t expect it ...
                  Damn, I need to lick the text now, I need to be more careful....
                  Well, life was good and peaceful...
                  We will try our best, Your Highness! feel
                  1. +4
                    1 November 2025 17: 56
                    Leave it, Vasily.
                    You seem to think I'm part of the site's administration? I'm sorry to disappoint you, but I'm just a user like you. I just know a little (very little) about online journalism.
                    1. +6
                      1 November 2025 18: 03
                      No, Anton, I know the composition of the site's administration. laughing
                      I, like you, am an ordinary user, with some special skills, and that's all. tongue
                      I just allowed myself to make a good-natured joke, it's a bit demagnetizing drinks
                      As my old friend used to say: It's even profitable to fool around a little - but what can you expect from a fool? fool drinks
                      1. +5
                        1 November 2025 18: 11
                        It's even profitable to fool around a little - what can you expect from a fool?
                        That's right! My first role on this site was as a jester. If I hadn't been acting like a fool, I would have been banned long ago.
                      2. +5
                        1 November 2025 19: 40
                        If he hadn't been acting like a fool, he would have been banned long ago.

                        "The art of being a jester is a fine balance on a razor's edge. wink
                      3. +4
                        1 November 2025 22: 49
                        This is how I am in life. Thank you, Sergey!
                      4. +1
                        4 November 2025 07: 50
                        What can be done with people whose every character is Ivan, who is not a prince at all.

                        But, alas, this role also has its drawbacks.
                      5. +2
                        4 November 2025 07: 57
                        Every role has its drawbacks.
                      6. +1
                        4 November 2025 08: 44
                        This Ivan isn't afraid to take risks. Sometimes he wins. And sometimes he misses.

                        But these cases rarely turn out to be fairy tales.
  25. +4
    1 November 2025 17: 54
    At the commander's request, the doses received were not recorded or written down...

    Everything you need to know about any military in any era
    1. +8
      1 November 2025 18: 50
      Quote: Engineer
      Everything you need to know about any military in any era


      What did you expect in 1988, two years after Chernobyl? Especially with Gorbachev's perestroika in place?
      I think the commander did the right thing... In peacetime, on a simple military ship, documenting radiation exposure is practically a guaranteed pension. And we're talking about the formality of it—the official entry in the personnel's special card and exposure log—not the actual work itself, which has already happened, whether you like it or not. soldier
      1. +4
        1 November 2025 19: 02
        Vasily, Denis is not quite on that point. "Imbecility and courage" is the motto of any armed forces at all times. The ineptitude of the upper ranks is compensated for by the courage of the lower ranks. Unfortunately.
        1. +5
          1 November 2025 19: 07
          My first commander at the formation said:
          "A sailor must be both stupid and determined! Only this is the key to successfully completing the assigned task!"

          Considering that Dahl's vocabulary only included interjections and words denoting family members, you can imagine the rest yourself... wassat
          And it worked! He was greatly loved by his subordinates, and terribly feared by his enemies (this is not a figure of speech, it was true). drinks
          1. +1
            1 November 2025 19: 17
            A sailor must be both tough and determined! Only this guarantees the successful completion of the assigned task!
            In the air defense in which I served, this maxim does not apply.
            1. +6
              1 November 2025 19: 24
              Quote: 3x3zsave
              In the air defense in which I served, this maxim does not apply.

              By God, it's not my fault, this phrase is carved on the tablets of the service... wassat

              It seems to me that the soldiers themselves always laugh at themselves harder than any outside storytellers. hi
      2. +1
        1 November 2025 20: 10
        The end of the USSR was marked by a monstrous number of disasters. How many boats sank? Chernobyl. Rust's arrival. The Alexander Suvorov. Despite all the apparent prosperity. It was a strange time.
        1. +6
          1 November 2025 20: 13
          Yeah... half-life, so to speak...
          Maybe the critical mass had already accumulated, and the idiot rulers couldn't pull it off... and then it went boom...
      3. +3
        2 November 2025 06: 46
        I think that the commander did the right thing.

        And I think it's a disgusting act.
        In peacetime, on a simple military ship, receiving radiation doses is almost immediately guaranteed pension.

        Well, let him retire. While we were in school, they drummed into us that command responsibility is the flip side of autocracy. "The commander is responsible for everything." But once I ended up in the army, it became clear that responsibility is a problem.
        An official entry in the special card and the personnel exposure log, and not about work in real conditions - it has already happened, whether you like it or not.

        Shouldn't people who received large doses of radiation have received special examination and treatment?
        Why did they instead continue to endure the "hardships and tribulations"? Because of the careerist responsible for the incident.
        What was the general situation with medical care in such cases?
        1. +1
          2 November 2025 09: 23
          There's no point in tearing me to pieces like that. Honestly...
          After all, this is literature (even though it is based on factual material), and not an investigative report, and it is not appropriate to cite many technical and legal points here.
          Were some officers/midshipmen (the same first mate and boatswain) and two or three sailors exposed to radiation? Of course. Was it measured? Yes. Was the accumulated radiation dose significant? The first mate had it; we saw his dosimeter, the boatswain's junior had a minor dose, and the boatswain's was not significant.
          Did these doses fall under the category of "radiation injury" and cause acute radiation sickness? No, they didn't. In these cases, it's not just the radiation level that matters, but also the duration of exposure. This was somehow acceptable. So, there's no point in kicking up a fuss with such uncompromising condemnation of everything and everyone...
          1. -1
            3 November 2025 21: 19
            Did these doses fall into the category of "radiation damage" and cause acute radiation sickness?

            But if it's not acute, is that normal? It could come back to haunt you later, and you won't be able to prove a connection between your problems and this incident. :((
            Was it measured? Yes, it was.

            You yourself wrote that no cards were issued to the staff. They only measured the "average temperature in the ward"...
    2. +4
      1 November 2025 19: 34
      I suspect the dosimeters are D500, the "pencil" ones. They're "blind," meaning the dose can only be read with a special device. And the operator will record the dose they're told to.
      1. +3
        1 November 2025 20: 21
        Perhaps, or maybe it was the DKP-50A, it's hard to remember the exact models now, they were all similar... there were also pen dosimeters. After a day or watch, the dosimeter was inserted into the device, and the readings were taken. Sailors were given dosimeters without readings, while officers (the commander, first mate, and boatswain) were given pen dosimeters with a dose display... There was also a roentgenometer, but it was never taken out.
        They didn't keep a log (or rather, they filled it out and then destroyed it, so as not to upset anyone)... everyone was afraid for the "economy" after Chernobyl, so there was definitely no need for panic on this topic back then...
  26. +7
    1 November 2025 19: 05
    Yeah... This describes our Navy in all its glory...
    Commanding towing operations from headquarters is the job of our "great" admirals. The main and worst thing about it isn't a desire to help. It's a desire to protect oneself from higher-ups. "Bending over," our way. No one can say you weren't in charge anymore. And if they didn't do it your way (and that's the only way it can happen), and it didn't work out, the perpetrator will always be to blame.
    It's a shame about our fleet. Just a shame.
    It's a good thing the tugboat belonged to the KGB.
  27. The comment was deleted.
  28. +3
    1 November 2025 19: 42
    Quote: MCmaximus
    The cap apparently bruises the head.

    Like head, like cap... something like that hi
  29. +6
    1 November 2025 20: 49
    Dear Vasily, I'm very sorry!
    It's a pity that a whole day has passed, and I only just now read your article.
    Congratulations on the amazing premiere! I read it in one sitting, like I was watching a gripping film without stopping. It's written with talent, simplicity, human appeal, and easy to read.
    Oh yes Ostrovsky, oh well done!!!
    Shaking hands from Frankfurt am Main. drinks good soldier
    1. +6
      1 November 2025 21: 12
      Thank you, but you're really making me blush, honestly... it's embarrassing, honestly...
      I understood about some son, that's in our language. lol
      Now, like Pokrovsky, all that's left is to take them to the stern and shoot them...
      There's no other way out. I'll submit the material for publication today or tomorrow. I hope it won't be too bad...
      drinks feel
      1. +4
        1 November 2025 21: 22
        It's nice to communicate with a person who has a sense of humor with a discreet mention of Alexander Sergeevich.
        I would like to write more precisely about someone's son, but for the second year now I have been loaded with a WARNING for a similar violation of the site rules. laughing
        1. +3
          1 November 2025 21: 33
          Quote: Fachmann
          It's nice to communicate with a person who has a sense of humor.

          Mutually hi
          I have two wicks burning and shining, but for training - a thing needed.... drinks
        2. +1
          2 November 2025 07: 34
          I've been stuck for three years now, and the comment section already says "error"
          1. +3
            2 November 2025 09: 43
            "Don't be sad, go with God" - A. Pushkin's favorite "The Tale of the Fisherman and the Fish"...
            What kind of commander is he without a "wick"? It means his life has been lived in vain! drinks
  30. +2
    2 November 2025 07: 32
    Thanks to the author for a wonderful article! Very interesting and informative, even for those who only swim in the sea. soldier
    So what happened to the boat?
    1. +2
      2 November 2025 09: 46
      Thanks for your kind words belay
      The fate of the boat is known to me only in outline.
      After emergency repairs to the reactor and routine maintenance at Bolshoy Kamen, the submarine continued its service and was later decommissioned... hi
  31. KCA
    0
    2 November 2025 09: 03
    A friend's brother was a RK commander, he towed a submarine from the Indian Ocean to Petropavlovsk on a lanyard, he doesn't say how, he received an order, but he only held it in his hands at the award ceremony, then it was in storage
    1. +3
      2 November 2025 09: 48
      This case was described in specialized literature, I read it about 15 years ago, and saw many similar things...
      Well done commander, by the way, he could very well receive an order today - the classification from the secret Decree of the USSR Armed Forces was removed long ago drinks soldier
      1. KCA
        -2
        2 November 2025 12: 05
        I don't know if it was one or the other, but my brother was clearly one of the winners, at 28 years old with the rank of captain two, he got a full pension, from 15 Nakhimov, then Kamchatka, a year for three, and also a free train car with belongings to Moscow for demobilization
        1. +2
          2 November 2025 15: 10
          Anything can happen in life... Your relative is a great guy and deserves the best reward.

          But let's look at it from the other side:
          He's an officer, a graduate of the Naval Academy. If nothing has changed, the training period is five years. The legal age for admission is no lower than 17. So, he graduated at 22, as usual. After six years, he received his captain's rank of second-in-command. Is that possible? In rare cases—namely, when a naval officer was promoted early at least twice—there may have been two or three such people in the Navy. So far, everything fits.

          Let's move on: On a full pension... Here's a big question: for a "full pension" you need about 28-29 years of service, since pensions in the USSR for officers were calculated strictly, for each year no more than 3% of service.
          Could an officer achieve 28% service in 6 years? No....
          Even if he spent all six years in the combat zone and it was ordered, 6 years x 3 years = 18 years of preferential service plus 5 years of military training, for a total of 23 years. That's a pension, but not a full one... although it's possible to live, not richly, but possible...
          Even in the special risk units, seniority was calculated at no more than 1 to 3...

          I think he was fired for health reasons, and most likely received a Group II disability, in which case he could at least get some sort of cover...
          But the pension of his colleagues in equal positions will be higher - if they have reached 28-29 years of preferential service, regardless of age.

          There's one constant here: college. They give you five calendar years toward your pension, and that's it.
          You probably politely chose not to publish all the other significant circumstances of your relative, but in the end, for a professional, things didn't go so smoothly.
          The guy's a hero, no doubt about it! But we, the people around him, sometimes imagine it all a bit... well, inaccurately, perhaps...
          I have the honor! soldier
          1. KCA
            -1
            4 November 2025 07: 15
            He began his service at the Nakhimov Naval School in Vladik at the age of 11, and the period of study is counted towards his service.
            1. +1
              4 November 2025 08: 01
              Quote: KCA
              He began his service at the Nakhimov Naval School in Vladik at the age of 11, and the period of study is counted towards his service.


              You are deeply mistaken, these "counts towards the length of service" were abolished in 1917, and maybe even earlier... lol

              1). The Vladivostok branch of the Nakhimov Naval School opened in 2014, the government decree was issued in 2013... and they accepted students into the 5th grade... 11 years in 2014 + 11 years until 2025 = 22 years, a bit early for retirement, you have to admit... well, that's just outrageous...
              2). In the USSR, length of service is counted toward length of service beginning with the date of taking the military oath, which is taken at age 18, or from the date of enrollment in a military higher education institution... in the Russian Federation, the same applies, from the date of admission to a higher education institution, which is neither Suvorov nor Nakhimov - see Decree of the President of the Russian Federation of September 16, 1999, No. 1237 "Questions of Military Service" (as amended and supplemented)....

              It's awkward to remind people of such things, but these stories about the counting of time spent studying at the Nakhimov and Suvorov military schools have been circulating since the post-war period. feel

              My father, for example, attended the Kronstadt School for Sea Boys, enrolling during the war. His term of service was counted only from the day he took the oath, that is, after the School for Sea Boys and his service as a cabin boy in the navy... Even then... good

              Today, children can sleep soundly - their military "kindergarten" will not be counted towards their service, unless the monarchy returns and the Tsar-father shakes off the old ways... bully

              For now, the information about a relative with a full military pension at 28 years old, as you presented it, is unreliable, sorry. hi
  32. -1
    2 November 2025 14: 19
    After some time, the submarine's commander said over the VHF that in about 3-4 hours the reactor would melt through the bottom of the hull and fall into the sea, there would be a thermal explosion, a small "boom"...


    I laughed.
    This simply can't happen, especially if the primary circuit temperature is 80 degrees Celsius. Fuel rod depressurization could occur, leading to a general deterioration in the radiation situation, but melting the reactor's bottom and then the reactor vessel...
    Nonsense full.
    1. +1
      2 November 2025 15: 24
      Thanks for the criticism.
      Those submariners who suffered disaster in 1988 will certainly understand you.
      I'm not a reactor expert, of course, but I listened to the recording of the negotiations.
      As for all sorts of speculative things... I like to indulge in them myself, but when a person who stood under bullets tells the story, I certainly don’t think of telling him, “You’re all lying.”
      For your information:
      A submarine reactor has a concrete shield around it, among other things. Specifically for super-accidents, to save the crew, the designers made the shielding at the bottom of the reactor significantly weaker, to allow the reactor, in a worst-case scenario, to melt down and fall out of the submarine to the seabed.

      Throw slippers at me, or throw them at the fan - in real life, anything can happen... Even things that can never happen...

      Personally, I had a shell get stuck in the barrel, and a second one stuck into it... the automatic system didn't prevent it, although it should have 100%.

      So what? Nothing! They knocked it out of the barrel by hand... and still nothing.

      If I go to the newspapers with this nonsense, they'll say I'm an idiot... and they'll be right, that can't be... But that's how it was...
      What should I do now? Hang myself?
      1. +3
        2 November 2025 16: 04
        For your information:
        A submarine reactor has a concrete shield around it, among other things. Specifically for super-accidents, to save the crew, the designers made the shielding at the bottom of the reactor significantly weaker, to allow the reactor, in a worst-case scenario, to melt down and fall out of the submarine to the seabed.

        All the equipment of the OK-350 reactor's steam generator unit (SGU), two of which are installed in Project 671, is housed in the water protection tank (WPT). This tank, in turn, is filled with water from the third circuit, which cools the reactor vessel, steam generators, pressurizers, pipelines, and valves.
        Concrete and lead are used as biological shielding against neutron and gamma radiation. They have no direct contact with polyurethane foam equipment.
        The maximum temperature in a nuclear reactor is significantly lower than the melting point of the steel from which the reactor vessel is made. When a nuclear reactor is shut down with standard absorbers, the nuclear fission chain reaction ceases. All that remains is residual heat, generated by the decay of fission fragments from uranium-235 nuclei. In this case, there was a leak in one of the reactors, which they were unable to handle due to a lack of feedwater. A thermal explosion due to a coolant leak is completely excluded due to the cessation of the nuclear chain reaction. This is the basics of reactor physics. Clearly, you weren't taught this (and the submarine commander should know it at least conceptually), so you're writing the nonsense he broadcast to you over the radio.
        I served on a submarine in the propulsion division. I know a thing or two about reactors. 🤣
        1. +3
          2 November 2025 16: 34
          Thanks for describing the process...
          Not being a reactor engineer, I will express my thoughts:
          On this submarine, the primary circuit feedwater was lost, and as a result, the core was heating up without cooling down. The temperature was rising while the border guards were working there - well over 100 degrees.
          Shutting down the reactor completely is not even a fantasy scenario, even if all the graphite rods fell down, the reaction would not stop, but would slow down... But then again, I'm not a reactor engineer.
          How the temperature gradient grows—both by location/volume and over time—is beyond my knowledge. This requires specialized developer-level knowledge. I'm out of luck here...

          If the submarine commander was yelling obscenities about the reactor falling out, it's kind of scary to think he was just a moron... I'll do a special interview with a submarine reactor developer on this subject; it's really interesting to hear from a pro...

          Believe me, I'm not defending either the narrator or myself as the author—but tell me, is this a fictional story? Just some guys wanting to have coffee in the middle of the Sea of ​​Okhotsk? With these kind of consequences?

          The Kursk submarine should never have sunk, in theory... Tell that to the families...
          1. +2
            2 November 2025 16: 50
            Instead of graphite, beryllium-based alloys are used as absorbers in transport reactor organs.
            The nuclear chain reaction ceases immediately after the absorbers are introduced. As I've already written, heat is generated by the decay of uranium fission fragments, which accumulate during the reactor's operation.
            In the event of an accident involving a leak in the primary circuit, the designer of the PPU has developed a detailed algorithm of actions that the personnel of the movement division must know like a multiplication table and be able to carry out.
            The amount and intensity of residual heat generated in a reactor depend on many factors: the power level at which it was operating, the remaining energy reserves, and the duration of operation. There is a calculation method.

            Regarding the Kursk.
            No ship, or submarine at all, is unsinkable. Every submarine mission carries a certain risk, especially if the equipment isn't properly maintained, and no one knows how to handle 650mm torpedoes properly.
            My classmate died on the Kursk.
            1. +1
              2 November 2025 16: 59
              An excellent addition to the story told in the article.

              So what was the cause of the accident and how could it all end?

              Just not in theory - we can still read books, but in real life?
              Please share your perspective on this accident from a reactor operator's perspective. It would be very interesting; there are only a few on this site who truly understand how a submarine reactor works.

              Note: the commander of the BC-4 of this submarine (or RTS?) 10 years after the accident (not a long time, you must admit) said: if it weren't for you and not at that time, we wouldn't be talking, we'd be a furry animal...
              I'll call him and tell him that he was upset for nothing then - everything is fine, just a little bit of stupid nerves. drinks
              1. +1
                2 November 2025 17: 19
                BC-4 of this submarine (or RTS?) 10 years after the accident (not a long time, you must admit) said: if it weren’t for you and not at that time, we wouldn’t be talking, we’d be a furry animal...

                Due to the lack of special knowledge and the peculiarities of their service (not all of them were even allowed to stand duty on submarines), the Luks tend to dramatize events.
                An accident, of course, unpleasant, associated with possible overexposure of personnel - this is the maximum that could have happened.
                There was a severe leak in the primary circuit, necessitating rapid abandonment of the nuclear reactor's protection and cooldown while simultaneously replenishing the circuit. Feedwater reserves were depleted, and the reactor compartment hold was filling accordingly. In the event of a coolant leak, the pressure and level in the nuclear reactor must be maintained to prevent coolant boiling and exposing the fuel assemblies containing nuclear fuel. Initially, the ship, and consequently the power plant, were powered by the battery, then emergency diesel generators were started, but they operated briefly (I no longer remember the reason). The battery capacity dropped below critical, and the replenishment and removal of residual heat ceased. This threatened to breach the fuel assembly seal, flushing the fuel mixture and fission products into the core circuit, and, consequently, sharply worsening the radiation situation. A thermal explosion was not possible, much less a meltdown of the reactor vessel.
                1. +2
                  2 November 2025 17: 33
                  Thank you for the detailed analysis, it is very useful to provide in notes or a postscript.
                  If you don't mind, I'll include this conclusion/opinion in my printed version. If you provide your information in a private message, I'll provide the source/author of the opinion.

                  Of course, from the point of view of the author of a literary work, I need to have a dramatic scene/plot/story, and for this, a disaster-catastrophe is not necessary; there are other techniques.

                  Seriously speaking, back in the 90s this accident was investigated by the developer, shipbuilders, and current specialists of the BC-5.

                  The conclusion was this: luck had broken loose, half a day and disaster had struck, the malfunctions and errors mounting like an avalanche. Little depended on the crew anymore; time was running out.

                  So, we have what we have. No fool-proof defense will work if the fool takes initiative...

                  In this case, "fool" is not a swear word, but a description of an ordinary user... having encountered resistance from the metal, the user rises to ingenious solutions that no scientist could ever reach, because he is guided by logic.

                  The user, overcoming environmental resistance, is not guided by logic... Yessss...
                  1. +1
                    2 November 2025 17: 39
                    No problem. I refreshed my memory on the accident report a while ago. I might have forgotten some of the details. But overall, that's about it.
                    Use my pseudonym, for a number of reasons I do not want to disclose my information yet, but a number of readers of this resource know me.
                    This accident involving a primary circuit leak is, unfortunately, not the only one. There have been others before and since, with varying consequences. These, too, have been investigated, analyzed, taken into account, and are used for training submarine crews.
    2. 0
      2 November 2025 15: 46
      You know a lot about naval humor! (c) wink
      The process described could hardly have literally taken place, due to the death of the submarine long before, but the existence of a reactor safety system called the "Melt Trap" hints at the plausibility of the process itself.
      1. +2
        2 November 2025 15: 59
        Thank you, colleague! drinks
        I really don't understand much about naval humor...

        Starting with Leonid Sobolev: "Put a sailor on all fours! He'll feel respect for you! But if you can't put him on all fours, he'll put you on all fours... Then the fleet's finished!... ("Overhaul")................
        One of my favorite quotes...

        At the special department of the F.E. Dzerzhinsky Higher Military-Engineering School of the 1970s (greetings to everyone who remembers that school), which was destroyed during the "optimization" process in the 2000s, lectures were given by the developers of this entire "disgrace," and we knew little more back then than today's children...

        The scenario is not at all speculative, you're absolutely right. But it's very, very unlikely... drinks
        1. +2
          2 November 2025 16: 05
          I beg your pardon, replied comrade 955535.
          1. +2
            2 November 2025 16: 13
            Sorry, don't apply to yourself. drinks
        2. +3
          2 November 2025 16: 24
          I just graduated from this faculty. Then I served a long time on nuclear submarines. My sense of humor is fine. My knowledge of the specialty is also good.
          1. +3
            2 November 2025 16: 43
            When I was a kid, the F.E. Dzerzhinsky Naval Academy had three departments: the first department—Propulsion/Energy (also known as the Special Department, for reactor engineers), the second department—Electrotechnical Engineering, and the third department—Shipbuilding. The second department had classes for submariners and surface naval pilots (two classes per year), and the same thing happened in the third department...

            As a reminder to all readers of this article, the school had the only operational nuclear submarine in the world, with a functioning "Wolfram" control panel...

            That idiot and traitor to the Motherland who decided to close the school in the Admiralty, let him burn in a fiery hyena... but these bastards won't burn, they're not flammable...
            It's simply impossible to recreate the training facilities at VMIOLU elsewhere; no amount of money would be enough...
            Respectfully drinks
            1. +2
              2 November 2025 16: 53
              In my time, the first faculty of Dzerzhinka was called the Faculty of Nuclear Power Engineering. With all due respect, the facilities at VVMIOLU were much smaller and more modest than those at SVVMIU, which folded in 1993. They had an operating reactor in the IR-100 laboratory, an operating vocational school of Project 670 in the Bort-70 laboratory, operating diesel engines, and operating control panels for the main propulsion plant and the operating stations.
              This is truly a loss of losses.
              1. +4
                2 November 2025 17: 09
                I guess that's true...
                Cadets always praise their system wassat
                In the 70s, there was only one operational submarine in Dzerzhinka in the country; the others were laboratory ones, as was known to those who were training.

                I agree that further saturation of the material base in the center of a city like Leningrad was not an easy task.

                But then, it was... what's it like now? Several schools were merged, the faculty was cut, and people left not just like that, but with their scientific ideas and developments... There's no other way to describe this pornography than as idiotic...
                I agree that the destruction of any educational institution of the VVMU/VVMIU class is simply a death sentence... there is no forgiveness for them... now they are trying to reopen old themes - everything is going very slowly, many things have to be reinvented, and this takes time, money, and personnel - you can't buy them even for a year...
                1. +2
                  2 November 2025 17: 23
                  Cadets always praise their system

                  I studied in both places, so I have something to compare it to.
                  In Dzerzhinka, the aircraft was used as a mockup, with only the oil pumps and barring gear operational. In Sevastopol, steam was supplied from the hot water chamber, allowing the GTZA turbine to be run at trial speeds and the turbogenerators to accept loads.
                  1. +4
                    2 November 2025 17: 40
                    Cool! Nice to meet you!

                    I was on board, worked with "Wolfram", and was very impressed...

                    Dzerzhinka was called "the system", they went to Pylnik...
                    It was a business ...
                    Respectfully drinks hi
                    1. +2
                      2 November 2025 17: 46
                      My story is completely similar to the story described by Edik Ovechkin in his "Sharks..." Until 1993, SVVMIU, then Dzerzhinka.
                      SVVMIU was also called Systema. Pokrovsky also has this name for his Alma Mater – VVMKU named after Kirov.
                      1. +3
                        2 November 2025 17: 52
                        It's very nice to see a native of the System wink

                        True, our teaching was a little earlier, in the 70s...

                        The System is a whole world! Frunze's school also called itself the System. drinks
      2. +2
        2 November 2025 16: 07
        I served on submarines for a long time, but I never heard of any "melt traps". 🤣
        Don't confuse RBMK reactors with VVRD reactors. The designs are completely different.
        The book I used to teach me theory can help you: https://elib.biblioatom.ru/text/aleshin_sudovye-yadernye-reaktory_1968/
        1. +2
          2 November 2025 16: 12
          Quote: 955535
          I served on submarines for a long time, but I never heard of any "melt traps"

          I didn't claim that such devices were installed on submarine reactors, much less on that specific one. I'll risk repeating that the existence of the aforementioned design confirms the theoretical possibility of the core of a damaged reactor melting through its casing.
          1. +3
            2 November 2025 16: 17
            It is true that such scenarios were not discussed as likely to occur with high frequency....

            But the physics of the process itself demanded that such a scenario be taken into account and mitigated, if possible, at the design and safety level, and, of course, as a completely hopeless option...

            The developers were giants... they thought ten steps ahead! But they made mistakes too, and that's no disgrace – it was too complex and new a project...
          2. +2
            2 November 2025 16: 19
            At stationary nuclear power plant reactors, it's possible. At transport pressurized water reactors (PWRRs), it's absolutely impossible. The first nuclear accident involving a coolant leak on the K-19 submarine confirmed this.
            1. +1
              2 November 2025 17: 58
              Thank you, consider drinks

              How does the accident in Chazhma fit into this? The lid wasn't blown off by the force of two drunken workers...
              From a specialist's point of view, what are the differences and similarities?
              I'm familiar with Wikipedia on this accident, so you can skip the platitudes. hi drinks
              1. +1
                2 November 2025 18: 04
                The Chazhma accident resulted from the reactor's instantaneous runaway due to the rapid removal of absorbers from the freshly loaded core. The absorbers were removed due to the reactor's lid being misaligned after being blown off by a floating crane.
                There is a comprehensive and detailed report on the accident in Chazhma on the SVVMIU website.
                https://forum.svvmiu.ru/viewtopic.php?t=9154&sid=ece61a01a6059eef0aab193b89ec81cc
              2. 0
                2 November 2025 18: 11
                All nuclear accidents are classified into:
                accidents related to leakage of coolant in the first circuit
                accidents associated with prolonged complete power outages of power plants
                accidents associated with uncontrolled development of power (reactivity accidents)
                accidents involving the rupture of the main steam pipeline and the inability to supply feedwater
                accidents involving fires in the reactor compartment
                accidents involving the rupture of the high-pressure fuel pipeline and pressurization of the reactor compartment
                accidents involving flooding of the reactor compartment.
                The Chazhma accident resulted from the reactor's instantaneous runaway due to the rapid removal of absorbers from the freshly loaded core. The absorbers were removed due to the reactor's lid being misaligned after being blown off by a floating crane.
                There is a comprehensive and detailed report on the accident in Chazhma on the SVVMIU website.
                https://forum.svvmiu.ru/viewtopic.php?t=9154&sid=ece61a01a6059eef0aab193b89ec81cc
                1. +1
                  2 November 2025 18: 33
                  Thank you, we will take this into account when working on the book. wink drinks soldier
  33. +3
    2 November 2025 20: 24
    It's a fairly standard situation: people who have proven themselves heroes, or at least demonstrated high levels of coordination and composure in a difficult situation, are carefully erased into oblivion due to the stink of the situation itself, or the inappropriateness of publishing it.
    For special services, there are at least secret decrees/orders on awarding, but sometimes posthumously, but for everyone... and this was the height of the so-called "Glasnost and Perestroika".
    But, thanks to the author, we now know about Fyodor Yakovlevich Dudkin and his remarkable crew of naval border guards; by the way, the names of the first mate and boatswain are also quite worthy of mention.
  34. 0
    2 November 2025 23: 59
    Thanks to the author for the article! We need more like this!
    1. +1
      3 November 2025 00: 21
      Thanks for your kind words winked
      There's already a sequel...
  35. 0
    3 November 2025 21: 27
    Yeah, I can imagine. As always, we have a ton of advice and overcoming challenges.
  36. +1
    4 November 2025 21: 38
    I read it all carefully, I'm an old officer, but in the end, in terms of infantry, we have only ponds and lakes in the Czech Republic. The whole story is wonderful, beautiful, and terrifying. Thank you. am
    1. 0
      5 November 2025 19: 19
      Thank you, Ladislav!

      I would give you a piece of the sea, but we don’t give up what’s ours; that’s not what we fought for. wassat , but someone else's - please!
      Here, the "comrades" Poles are suffering from the issue of "from sea to sea"...

      Come and enjoy our seas, we have something for every taste and color - from north to south, from west to east... drinks hi
  37. 0
    5 November 2025 19: 10
    Something like that happened.
    The reactor on the boat started leaking.
    The border guards asked for bi-distillate (double distillate).
    At that time, Sergey Kalin was the operational commander of the KVF, 2nd rank. He was the head of the Lustra command post.
    He was the eldest.
    I vaguely remember running back then...it didn't really concern me.
    1. 0
      6 November 2025 07: 29
      Quote: Semion-9999
      At that time, Sergey Kalin was the operational commander of the KVF, 2nd rank. He was the head of the Lustra command post.

      We met him in the 90s and went to Paratunka. drinks with pictures feel
      He was a cool guy good
      Hi to him hi
      1. 0
        6 November 2025 08: 27
        I quit my job in 90. I heard he got divorced.
        I knew another of his cavalrymen, Lobanov. He commanded the 671st Rifle Marine Corps.
        Paratunka is probably ours?
        At the Razvilka gated community. It had its own swimming pool.
        1. 0
          6 November 2025 09: 37
          Quote: Semion-9999
          Paratunka is probably ours?
          At ZKP "Fork".


          It is she, my dear... yes, sir...
          Wasn't Lobanov on the same boat?
          1. 0
            6 November 2025 15: 20
            He was on K-492 after Dudko.
            After his "Epic" of catching the Ohio off Bangor.
            Well, that's a whole other story 😄
            1. 0
              6 November 2025 15: 27
              There's a lot of nonsense that's been spun around about this story too...
              And in general, often, when talking with the participants, you get a completely different picture...
              And then all sorts of “standing nearby”, “hearing something”, “a relative told me” appear...
              And of course, all sorts of "experts" and admirals of the Moscow River... it's impossible to listen to them anymore...

              Tell us, either yourself or "sprinkle" some material - maybe we'll "cook up" something readable....
              Otherwise, at least the kids know something, but the grandchildren will be fed complete rubbish from all sorts of "cool bloggers" who have never held anything heavier than a cup of pumpkin latte. drinks
              1. The comment was deleted.
                1. 0
                  6 November 2025 18: 14
                  Here it is!
                  Excellent, I'm reading. drinks
                  1. 0
                    6 November 2025 21: 02
                    Yes. Good luck with your reading. wink
                    Before I get banned again
  38. The comment was deleted.
  39. 0
    7 November 2025 08: 51
    👍👍👍👍👍
    And didn't the naval units of the KGB Border Troops explain to the Moscow admirals that they should go off on an erotic journey through the forest, since they are not subordinate to them at all?
    I remember that on the Ussuri, the land and river border guards, on the contrary, had the entire Red Army by the nostrils, ensuring border regime.
    1. 0
      7 November 2025 14: 03
      Quote: Tank DestroyerSU-100
      I remember that on the Ussuri, the land and river border guards, on the contrary, had the entire Red Army by the nostrils, ensuring border regime.


      This is a myth... At that time, several fortified areas and front-line Soviet troops were deployed. Border guards, as expected, were engaged in guarding and defending the border in their zone and did not command Soviet units. The fact that Grad multiple rocket launchers were used at Damanskoye and army armor was brought in does not make the border troops or the KGB itself "in charge and in charge."

      I love border guards, but don't stretch the truth...


      Quote: Tank DestroyerSU-100
      And didn't the naval units of the KGB Border Troops explain to the Moscow admirals that they should go off on an erotic journey through the forest, since they are not subordinate to them at all?


      Another myth, this one stems from a misunderstanding of the role and tasks that faced the KGB, and bears traces of a formal transfer of the image of the NKVD to another historical period.

      The KGB was not subordinate to the Ministry of Defense, but the Ministry of Defense was not subordinate to the KGB.

      The two agencies worked in cooperation with each other, and during the rescue operation, all significant orders of the Navy were carried out only with the approval of the Main Directorate of the Navy of the KGB of the USSR, since the entire operation was provided with the necessary communications of the ZAS.

      But when it comes to issues that are significant for both sides and are brought before the CPSU Central Committee—for example, the issue of awards—they've already gone down the path of "non-proliferation."

      The KGB wanted to reward its own, and there were reasons for it. But such an award would have made the Navy's leadership look sour, leading to debriefings at the highest levels, and it's not a given that someone wouldn't have gotten a severe beating, and the head itself might not have been spared.
      This year has already been a "big harvest" of accidents and emergencies, and now there's also an accident with a nuclear power plant...