The X-59 QueSST experimental aircraft took to the skies for the first time.

11 828 33
The X-59 QueSST experimental aircraft took to the skies for the first time.
The X-59 takes to the skies for the first time.


Over the past several years, NASA and Lockheed Martin have been developing, building, and preparing the X-59 QueSST experimental aircraft for testing. Its design incorporates several innovative ideas and solutions aimed at reducing noise during supersonic flight. All preliminary work has now been completed and test flights have begun.



First results


The QueSST (Quiet Supersonic Technology) research program was launched about 10 years ago by NASA. Over the course of several years, various scientific studies were conducted, and new technologies and components were developed.

In 2016, NASA and Lockheed Martin signed a contract to develop and build a fully functional experimental aircraft based on new technologies. The future aircraft, designated X-59, was planned for construction and testing during the first half of the 2020s.

The design was completed by the end of 2018, after which production of the first components for the prototype aircraft began. Assembly of the aircraft itself began in mid-2019 at Plant No. 42 in Palmdale, California. This process was completed in the early 2020s, after which some ground testing and inspections were conducted.

In January 2024, the official presentation of the experimental X-59 took place at the same plant. Representatives of the development organizations spoke extensively about the importance of this project and its prospects. They also promised to begin flight tests soon, during which all the key advantages of this unusual design would be demonstrated.


A plane in flight. Photo Flickr / Matt Hartman

It's worth noting that the construction of the prototype aircraft occurred during a specific period, and the work schedule had to be adjusted several times. Initially, the first flight was planned for 2020. It was subsequently gradually pushed back to 2025-26. The estimated completion dates for the program and the achievement of actual results were similarly postponed.

The plane is in the air


Since its unveiling, the X-59 has remained at the Palmdale facility undergoing various procedures and processes. Necessary checks of individual systems and the aircraft as a whole were performed. All these activities have now been completed, allowing the aircraft to be cleared for full flight testing.

On July 10, 2025, the prototype aircraft took off on its own for the first time. Taxiing and high-speed runs along the runway began. The aircraft demonstrated normal performance at various speeds during acceleration and braking.

The maiden flight of the experimental X-59 took place on October 28. Under the control of a test pilot, the aircraft took off from the factory airfield and traveled to the Armstrong Flight Research Center at Edwards Air Force Base. NASA reported that the flight took place at altitudes no higher than 3000-3500 meters and at speeds of up to 380-400 km/h. The aircraft performed some simple maneuvers.

The purpose of the maiden flight was to demonstrate the overall capabilities and reliability of the design. The aircraft completed a simple flight program and demonstrated the required level of performance, safety, and other attributes. The developers praised this flight, but they expect further development to achieve new results.


X-59 at the assembly station. Photo by NASA.

In three steps


NASA and Lockheed Martin previously revealed a rough plan for future flight tests. These activities will last several years and be divided into three main phases. Each phase will address specific challenges, ranging from simple to complex. During each flight, data will be collected to refine the design, control algorithms, and more.

The first stage is necessary for a general check of the aircraft and its systems. The aircraft will be tested in various flight modes across virtually all expected altitude and speed ranges. Once these tests are successfully completed, the program's main experiments can begin.

The second phase of the QueSST project involves reaching supersonic flight speeds and assessing the aircraft's noise emissions. Various measurements and studies will be conducted to demonstrate the true potential of the project's key solutions. It is expected that field testing will confirm the previously drawn conclusions and eliminate the need for significant design revisions.

In the long term, a third phase, designated "community response assessment," will take place. The experimental X-59 will fly over various parts of the United States. During this time, testers and volunteers on the ground will evaluate the noise it produces.

The results of all flight tests, which will take several years, will yield a large volume of various data. First and foremost, this will be information on the performance and effectiveness of the QueSST project's key technical solutions. The results of acoustic studies, including subjective assessments by ground observers, will also be of great importance.


In preparation for ground testing. Photo: NASA

It is expected that the developments and practical results of the QueSST program will be able to find application in the future in the creation of a promising aviation technology. They will be especially useful for civil aviation developers. These new solutions will help them overcome one of the main problems associated with this type of technology—the shock wave, which causes inconvenience on the ground.

Key decisions


The X-59 project is based on several ideas aimed at reducing noise during supersonic flight. This effect is achieved through a special airframe shape and optimized aerodynamics. Wind tunnel tests have already demonstrated the potential of these solutions, and now they will be confirmed using a full-size aircraft.

It's worth remembering that during supersonic flight, so-called shock waves—areas of increased pressure that form in front of the nose, in front of the wing or vertical stabilizer, and behind the aircraft—form a shock wave. This shock wave is felt on the ground as a loud bang that follows the aircraft throughout its supersonic flight.

The X-59 design features streamlined airframe exterior contours with a minimum number of protruding parts. This reduces the number of disturbances and shock waves.

The aircraft also features a distinctive long, pointed nose cone. This reduces the nose shock wave and moves it forward, away from other structural elements that also generate shock waves. This airframe still creates high-pressure areas, but the shock waves are spread out. They don't intersect or reinforce each other, which should reduce overall noise levels.


Test pilot Nils Larson prepares for his first flight, July 2025. Photo: Lockheed Martin

The experimental X-59 aircraft has an overall length of 29 meters and a wingspan of 9 meters. A unique nose cone occupies approximately a third of the aircraft's length. A single-seat cockpit is located behind it. The fuselage houses fixed canards, a delta wing, and a conventional tail assembly. The aircraft's takeoff weight is 14,7 tons.

The aircraft is equipped with a single F414-GE-100 turbojet engine. Its estimated maximum speed is Mach 1,5, with a cruising speed of Mach 1,42. Its range and endurance were not disclosed. However, the experimental nature of the project means that record-breaking performance is not necessary.

The X-59 has all the necessary instruments for piloting in various conditions, navigation, and communications. To improve aerodynamics, a full-fledged canopy was eliminated. Forward visibility is provided by the eXternal Vision System. It includes video cameras located at the top and bottom of the fairing, the feed from which is displayed on a widescreen monitor in the cockpit.

Future technologies


Thus, one of NASA's most exciting modern projects is moving forward successfully and entering its most important and crucial phase. In the coming years, the X-59 experimental aircraft will demonstrate its real-world performance and prove the potential of the QueSST program's key solutions.

The actual results of the current work remain unknown. However, NASA and Lockheed Martin are optimistic about the future and expect the experimental aircraft to live up to expectations. If they are proven right, the QueSST program could have an impact on the development of civil aviation. However, this will only happen in the distant future.
33 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -2
    30 October 2025 05: 24
    NASA and Lockheed Martin look to the future with optimism
    Optimism is all well and good, but I prefer realism. Okay, maybe they'll succeed, and then they'll design and build a civilian passenger airliner. But it seems to me that, as with the Concorde and the Tu-144, the pressing question will arise: where will this airliner fly to justify the investment? No, Musk, for example, could afford such a plane; he has the money. But will ordinary citizens be able to? The ticket price for such an airliner would be prohibitive, no question about that. Supersonic speed isn't particularly necessary on domestic routes: the distances aren't that great. The US-Australia, the US-Europe—I agree, it's perfectly acceptable. With a ticket price at least twice as high as usual. And whether people will pay extra for speed is a question.
    1. IVZ
      +7
      30 October 2025 06: 18
      Perhaps, during R&D, new solutions will be found that will make such products cost-effective. R&D, in principle, is needed for this purpose (searching for and developing new solutions).
      1. 0
        30 October 2025 06: 37
        Perhaps, during the course of R&D, new solutions will be found that will make such products cost-effective.
        I understand, but I doubt it. Time will tell.
        1. +3
          30 October 2025 15: 44
          Reminds me of Musk's RN discussions with the landing of the first stage: that's when we'll talk.
          1. -1
            30 October 2025 16: 10
            Reminds me of Musk's RN discussions with the landing of the first stage: that's when we'll talk.
            I just doubt the rationality and future profitability of this plane. If they build it, they build it. If it flies, it flies. It's a no-brainer, so to speak. smile
            1. 0
              31 October 2025 11: 06
              It's a bad habit to count other people's money.
    2. +4
      30 October 2025 11: 54
      Quote: Maltsev A.A., Matveeva A.V. International passenger air transportation: determinants of explosive growth
      According to the World Bank, between 1980 and 2017, air freight turnover increased 7,9-fold to 212,8 billion ton-km, while the number of passengers carried increased 6,4-fold to 4,1 billion passengers.

      That is, since the days of Concorde and the Tu-144, the number of passengers has increased by the amounts indicated here. The market has grown significantly, so I dare say there are some grounds for optimism regarding the creation of a "premium segment."
      1. 0
        30 October 2025 14: 14
        The number has increased proportionally to the penny cost; here, flying is cheaper than trains almost everywhere; you can get a ticket to St. Petersburg for three thousand. But here, apparently, the business jet has its own economy; more precisely, the more expensive the better. Whether the rich guys are in a hurry is a question. request
        1. 0
          31 October 2025 11: 45
          Quote from alexoff
          And are the rich uncles in a hurry to get anywhere? That's the question.

          They count their time like money. They're now building these little pepelats to save time on transoceanic routes, because time is money.
          We've also pondered this several times, and even Arab sheikhs have asked Putin to build one (I once talked about it myself), but so far no one has built one – the safety and reliability requirements are extremely high, the complexity of the work is enormous, and the production run (if we can even talk about production at all) will be extremely limited. Although our officials have also been enthusiastic – to fly fast to the Far East. And back. Once a powerful and sufficiently fuel-efficient non-afterburning engine for such a tiny aircraft appears, business jets will appear immediately. We are expecting such an engine, but we have other plans for it for now.
          1. 0
            31 October 2025 15: 22
            They count their time like money.
            Is that true? They cruise leisurely on yachts, without attaching any hydrofoils to them. I think they should have – they made mini-Concordes a hundred years ago. Or maybe they made the B-1B civilian.
            A powerful and quite economical one will appear
            Why do billionaires need an economy class? Don't they have enough money? laughing
            1. 0
              31 October 2025 17: 24
              Quote from alexoff
              They sail leisurely on yachts, without attaching any hydrofoils to them.

              These are those who rest. Those who work value their time.
              Quote from alexoff
              I think it should have been - they made mini-concordes a hundred years ago.

              With screws and on an internal combustion engine?
              Quote from alexoff
              Or the B-1B was made civilian.

              What's the point? It's subsonic. It only goes supersonic in afterburner, and for a short time. The Tu-160 is the same, but it can stay supersonic for 40 minutes in afterburner.
              Quote from alexoff
              A powerful and reasonably economical one will appear. Why do billionaires need an economical one? Not enough money?

              There's not enough fuel on board for sustained supersonic flight, even without afterburners. So for now, wishes and dreams remain just that—dreams.
  2. +1
    30 October 2025 10: 12
    What kind of civilian airliner is this? It's clearly a prototype of a 6th-generation aircraft—supersonic at high altitudes.
    It is worth noting that the Yankees have long been striving to create a hypersonic engine.
    1. +4
      30 October 2025 10: 30
      The 6th generation implies "invisibility" as a necessary component. Judging by the images, there's no sign of invisibility here. And the stated goal of the project is "inaudibleness." laughing
    2. -3
      30 October 2025 11: 58
      That could be true. Americans always seem to use X-wings to test cutting-edge technologies and explore new flight modes. And this is information that's... dual-use.
  3. -3
    30 October 2025 10: 17
    Why does he have such a long nose?
    Is this a hint of bright commercial prospects?
    1. -2
      30 October 2025 10: 49
      A hint that this project will leave all its creators with nothing. Pinocchio plane.
    2. +1
      30 October 2025 15: 47
      Did you actually read the article? It explains why the nose cone is so long.
      1. +1
        31 October 2025 21: 25
        I read the article and I can confidently say that you are a master of passing off a failure as a victory.

        This X-59 with a Pinocchio-like nose is just a typical testbed aircraft. Far more of these were built during the development of both the Tu-144 and Concorde. Perhaps the only remarkable thing about this testbed is its construction time. Eight fucking years, Karl! Did they cut it out of a block of duralumin with files?
        With such a timeframe, Lockheed will have a serial supersonic aircraft ready by the end of this century.

        Actually, these considerations and the fact that you went overboard with the bombastic phrases about ten times, served as the reason for my top comment, which contains only sarcasm and mockery of those who want to lick the American master between the buns as deeply as possible.
  4. +5
    30 October 2025 10: 23
    Quote: General Failure
    Why does he have such a long nose?
    Is this a hint of bright commercial prospects?

    Hello. This is necessary to reduce the number and intensity of shock waves generated by distributing them along the entire length of the aircraft. Consequently, when breaking the sound barrier, there will be no loud noise, typical in such a situation.
    1. +3
      30 October 2025 11: 17
      Why should an internet clown answer? He clearly didn't ask this question because he was genuinely interested in the product's design.
  5. +1
    30 October 2025 14: 42
    This is a prototype, on the basis of which all decisions will be worked out.
  6. 0
    30 October 2025 18: 14
    Thus, one of the most interesting modern NASA projects


    Who cares? Who cares about it besides those who started it and keep it going? I honestly don't get it, WHY? Supersonics don't fly low. Air resistance doesn't recommend them. And at high altitude, well, it'll be twice as quiet, so what? What difference will that make? Will Supersonic tickets get cheaper? Will Supersonics become cheaper to operate? To manufacture? What was all this darts made for? Just to satisfy someone's curiosity? No, I understand when a techie has nothing better to do, it's hard, and their body isn't as flexible as a cat. I have to scratch my curiosity, but in this particular case, WHY?
    1. +2
      30 October 2025 23: 40
      If they don't make a quieter noise, they won't meet existing noise standards and won't be allowed to fly over populated areas.

      The market for supersonic business jets/passenger airliners, which can only fly over seas due to their noise at supersonic speeds, is so small today that developing them simply isn't worth the effort.

      Until the problem of supersonic flight over land, which is unbearable for ordinary people below, is solved, no one will spend money on developing and launching a second generation of civilian supersonic aircraft (the first generation was the Tu-144 and Concorde).

      So they're deciding—using an experimental aircraft. Without a successful flying experiment, no one will invest.
  7. 0
    30 October 2025 19: 01
    Everything's great with noise, but where does the fuel consumption go? Air resistance at supersonic speeds is an order of magnitude higher. Kerosene consumption is also clearly higher, which is what killed the Tu-144 and Concorde, not noise. Concorde flew for quite a long time, and Europe had no complaints about the noise. I remember visiting my aunt in Beloomut in the summer in the late 70s, not far from the MIG factory in Lukhovitsy. Yes, test pilots in the MIG-23 regularly broke the sound barrier, and whether there was any discomfort was a given.
    1. +1
      30 October 2025 23: 47
      Quote: Yuri_K_Msk
      Everything's great with noise, but where does the fuel consumption go? Air resistance at supersonic speeds is an order of magnitude higher.

      As flight altitude increases, air resistance decreases. As a result, fuel consumption can be quite acceptable during supersonic cruising at Mach 1,8 and an altitude of 20 meters, an altitude unattainable for subsonic airliners.
      1. +1
        2 November 2025 18: 06
        Quote: AlexanderA
        As flight altitude increases, air resistance decreases. As a result, fuel consumption can be quite acceptable during supersonic cruising at Mach 1,8 and an altitude of 20 meters, an altitude unattainable for subsonic airliners.


        So, with an increase in altitude to 20 kilometers, the noise problem will be solved :) If the airliner rises to 20 kilometers, who cares how much it rumbles and bangs there :) No one on the ground will hear a thing. Also, don't forget, the higher the altitude, the less efficient the turbojet and wing. This is due to the smaller volume of air, which is the working fluid for the turbojet, and the source of lift for the wing. The atmospheric density at an altitude of 20 kilometers is 0,089 kg/m³, and at sea level it is 1,225 kg/m³. So, it's not all that simple with increasing flight altitude. A wing for high-altitude flight and a wing for low-altitude flights are different wings, and the wings of supersonic and subsonic aircraft are practically developed in opposite directions. A high-altitude passenger supersonic aircraft will most likely be monstrously expensive to build, and the sound problem will be of last importance compared to it.
        1. 0
          2 November 2025 23: 35
          Quote: abc_alex
          So, with an increase in altitude to 20 kilometers, the noise problem will be solved :) If the airliner rises to 20 kilometers, who cares about how it rumbles and bangs there :)

          The problem won't be solved without working on the airframe's shape. The sonic boom exceeds noise standards even when flying at supersonic speeds for existing supersonic aircraft at an altitude of 20 km. That's why they're working on the shape. They've even built and flown an experimental aircraft.
          Also, don't forget that the higher the altitude, the less efficient the turbojet engine and wing are.

          Examples of dual-mode (two cruising speeds, supersonic and subsonic) supersonic aircraft designs include the Tu-444, Aerion, and QSST. The practical flight range of these aircraft at supersonic and subsonic speeds (transonic) was planned to be virtually identical.

          For example, Aerion. M=1,6 - 7400 km, M=0,95-1,1 - 7400 km

          http://www.telenir.net/transport_i_aviacija/vzlyot_2005_04/p14.php

          "Aerion solved the sonic boom problem very simply—it limited the aircraft's flight speed over land to transonic. This likely explains the use of a non-swept wing, which operates effectively at both supersonic and transonic speeds. Flight over the ocean should occur at cruising speed, corresponding to Mach 1,6. Nevertheless, the sonic boom force of the new SAS should be half that of the Concorde, amounting to 5,86 kgf/m2 at Mach 1,6. The flight range, even at speeds corresponding to Mach 0,95-1,1, is 7400 km."

          QSST M=1,8 - 7400 km, M=0,95-0,98 - 7000 km.

          "The second SAS project was presented at the conference by Supersonic Aerospace International (SAI), headed by Michael Paulson. It developed a design for a low-noise supersonic aircraft, the QSST (Quiet Small Supersonic Transport), capable of flying at supersonic speeds both over the ocean and over land. Its sonic boom force should be only 1,46-2,44 kg/m2. To minimize the sonic boom at cruising speed, corresponding to Mach number = 1,6-1,8, it was necessary to develop a new aerodynamic configuration of the airframe, which, naturally, caused an increase in takeoff weight. Therefore, the QSST is 30 tons heavier than the aircraft of the Aerion company. In addition, the QSST will require the creation of new engines. The cost of developing the QSST project is estimated at 2,5-3 billion dollars. The first flight of the prototype machine may take place in 2010-2011. p., and in another year the aircraft will be able to enter service.

          The QSST's aerodynamic configuration is quite unique. The aircraft features a canard configuration, with a delta wing featuring reverse struts to reduce weight. The primary structural material is aluminum alloy. However, despite the significant reduction in sonic boom, it is entirely possible that the aircraft will still fly at subsonic speeds over the United States. Its range at Mach 0,95-0,98 will be 7000 km.

          A high-rise passenger supersonic vehicle would likely be monstrously expensive to build, and sound issues would be the last thing on its list.

          Without a solution to the sonic boom problem, designing a passenger supersonic aircraft is pointless. No one today needs a supersonic passenger jet that can only fly supersonic over the sea. The aforementioned dual-mode aircraft, which failed to find funding, illustrate this point.
  8. +1
    30 October 2025 19: 39
    Very interesting! It looks incredibly cool. Let's see what comes of this experimental design.
    1. -2
      30 October 2025 21: 26
      Quote: acetophenon
      Very interesting! Looks incredibly cool.

      For some reason, I get the opposite impression. It's as skinny as a worm. Even the military wouldn't like something like this; where would they hide the missiles? The useful internal volume is clearly minuscule. Commercial use is out of the question; this miracle won't carry anything but itself.
  9. 0
    31 October 2025 04: 13
    GOST 24646-81
    TRANSPORT AIRCRAFT
    SUPERSONIC
  10. 0
    31 October 2025 09: 20
    Quote: Saxahorse
    Quote: acetophenon
    Very interesting! Looks incredibly cool.

    For some reason, I get the opposite impression. It's as skinny as a worm. Even the military wouldn't like something like this; where would they hide the missiles? The useful internal volume is clearly minuscule. Commercial use is out of the question; this miracle won't carry anything but itself.

    Well, the article mentioned "experimental" and "experimental" about 10 times...
  11. 0
    31 October 2025 12: 37
    Well done. In seven years, you've taken it and brought it up to flight level. New experiences, new results.
  12. 0
    14 February 2026 11: 54
    And where are people rushing to? ...............