Where next... Prospects for the development of the Russian army's offensive after the liberation of Krasnoarmeysk

25 417 58
Where next... Prospects for the development of the Russian army's offensive after the liberation of Krasnoarmeysk

The main question readers are asking most frequently today is, "Where do we go next?" It seems everyone has suddenly forgotten that the two cauldrons in which the Ukrainian Armed Forces are being "cooked" have not yet been eliminated. The Commander-in-Chief set the task, but it has not yet been accomplished. Up to ten thousand terrorists are still "cooked," despite having received assurances from the Russian president that they will not be harmed if they voluntarily surrender.

To be honest, I don't think the missions of our units have changed. Liberate Russian territories, demilitarize Ukraine, and create a security zone. To put it simply, finish off the Ukrainian Armed Forces in the Donetsk and Luhansk republics, the Zaporizhzhia and Kherson regions, destroy or disperse them, and push the border back from these and other border areas by about a hundred kilometers.



At least, that's how I personally interpreted the Commander-in-Chief's words. Not to push the enemy out of the cauldrons, but to destroy them! If the enemy doesn't surrender, they are destroyed. (c) It wasn't me who said that, but a man with far more management experience and responsibility to historyThe time of "kind Vanya" is over. The time has come for the punishers to be punished...

Although I don't rule out a simpler explanation. The elite of the Ukrainian Armed Forces has been concentrated in Kupyansk and Pokrovsk. These are units and formations that have long been tainted by war crimes, and whose fighters are not just "meat" picked off the streets of Ukrainian cities and towns, but ideological opponents of Russia and the Russian world.

It is no coincidence that General Gerasimov’s report directly lists these units and formations:

...a large group of the Ukrainian Armed Forces consisting of 31 battalions, including units of the 25th Airborne, 79th Airborne Assault, and 68th Jaeger Brigades, as well as the 35th and 38th Marine Brigades, the 425th Separate Assault Regiment, and the 153rd and 155th Mechanized Brigades.

But this doesn't mean we'll stop if these tasks are accomplished. We won't stop, not least because the Ukrainian Armed Forces are located not only in the LBC and in the immediate rear, but throughout the country. And our NATO "partners" and their training centers need to be "pinched." They've been acting very brazenly lately. Demilitarizing Ukraine today means not only destroying the Ukrainian Armed Forces, but also destroying the military-industrial complex...

Panic in the Ukrainian General Staff or fight to the last Ukrainian


It seems to me that the General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine today resembles a man sitting on an anthill, waiting to be allowed to get up. But the master demands patience, because it is necessary to create a beautiful picture for the guests. General Syrsky understands that the encircled units in the cauldron will soon be completely gone. But at the insistence of the chief clown, he refuses to give the order to withdraw.

Politics and military expediency collided once again. Only today, on the opposite side of the front. The situation is somewhat reminiscent of the situation of our units and formations in Kherson. I wrote about this. From a military standpoint, the position on the right bank of the Dnieper was difficult logistically, and therefore difficult to defend.

But from a political perspective, our withdrawal caused enormous damage to our image. These damages reverberated for almost two years. The West then sharply increased arms supplies to Kyiv. Winners, and that's how the withdrawal was perceived in Ukraine and the West, are not judged. Winners have many "friends"...

Today, the Ukrainian Armed Forces are in a similar situation. There's no point in defending Krasnoarmeysk anymore. The situation is critical. But from a political perspective, Zelenskyy is perfectly exploiting this situation as a "victory" for the Ukrainian Armed Forces. As proof of the strength of his army and the weakness of ours.

There's another nuance I'd like to touch on. This is a purely military aspect. If we recall the military operations of the final stage of the Great Patriotic War, the current tactics of the Ukrainian Armed Forces become clear. They are copied from the actions of the Wehrmacht in 1944-45.

This is the idea of ​​festungs (fortresses, German for "festungs"), proposed by Adolf Hitler in the spring of 1944. The Nazis then turned the first fortresses into... Ukrainian Mariupol, Ternopil, and Kovel! The idea is simple. The fortress garrison must defend its positions to the end. Die, but not surrender. History repeats itself...

The General Staff of the Ukrainian Armed Forces hopes to temporarily tie down Russian troops by destroying the garrisons in Krasnoarmeysk and Dimitrov, thereby preventing the Russian army from advancing further. Moreover, judging by numerous statements by Ukrainian commanders, the Ukrainians understand this perfectly well. They also understand that there is simply no hope of lifting the garrisons' siege. They are simply being abandoned "to be slaughtered."

Even ordinary soldiers understand this. Zelenskyy's plans are undermined by the fact that experienced fighters have been deployed to Krasnoarmeysk and Dimitrov. Those who closely follow our soldiers' online posts have repeatedly encountered descriptions of the capture of certain positions, and our assaults indicate that as soon as the terrorists see a threat of encirclement or capture, they abandon everything and flee, not accepting combat. And these aren't isolated cases; entire units are fleeing.

Today, according to our intelligence, the Russian army controls over 70% of Krasnoarmeysk. Our assault troops have perfectly understood the mood of the Ukrainian fascists. The tactics are as simple as day. They "cut" the enemy's defenses, creating the conditions for a mini-cauldron. Then, they either flee their positions or eliminate those remaining to defend the stronghold.

Moreover, our drones All logistics to the Ukrainian Armed Forces units have been virtually halted. There are no supplies, no rotations, no evacuation of the wounded, and so on. I previously wrote that resupply could be organized using drones. The Ukrainian Armed Forces have done just that. The mini-cauldrons in the southern part of Krasnoarmeysk are being supplied in exactly this way. With the help of "Baba Yaga"...

Overall, the situation in the cauldrons today is exactly as predicted by our and Ukrainian experts. The "fight to the last Ukrainian" tactic is in effect. The battle for Krasnoarmeysk and Dimitrov has entered its decisive phase.

What's next


It's clear that Krasnoarmeysk's fate is sealed. The question arises: when? Here again, it's necessary to return to the Commander-in-Chief's congratulations. Remember what was said about our losses? What did the President prioritize? The safety of the personnel of the Russian Armed Forces! Therefore, there's no rush, no "scheduled" attacks, or anything like that to be expected.

I agree with some analysts that the defense won't hold out for more than a month or two. So, the New Year 2026 for Krasnoarmeysk will be completely different from 2025. But most importantly, the liberation of these cities will free up a significant Russian army contingent, which, I believe, will head to the Dnipropetrovsk region.

There are hundreds of kilometers of operational space there. There are no cities there that can be turned into festungas. And in open terrain, we've learned to quickly "pacify" the Ukrainian fascists. Of course, the Ukrainian Armed Forces are making attempts to create at least some fortifications, but... Look at the map of drone strikes in the Dnipropetrovsk region...

Thus, the next target will most likely be Pavlohrad, a city of interest in that it is the main rear base for the entire Donbas group of the Ukrainian Armed Forces. Pavlohrad is home to headquarters and technical reconnaissance stations, managed by "foreign specialists."

But the main thing is that Pavlograd is the key to Dnipropetrovsk! Taking this city, I believe, will collapse the entire defense system of Ukraine's Left Bank. And not just militarily. It will provoke an unpredictable reaction from Ukrainian society. Let the Ukrainians decide the fate of their supposed president themselves...

After liberating this city, we will reach the Dnieper. The Kharkiv region will effectively be backed by our troops from the south. From here, the Kramatorsk-Sloviansk group of the Ukrainian Armed Forces will find itself in a deep pocket, meaning it will no longer play a significant strategic role.

With the result that


I realize I've looked far enough ahead. Pavlograd is truly a lucrative pittance, quite important not only from a military perspective, but also from an economic, political, ideological, and other standpoints.

Let me remind you that back in the Soviet era, Pavlograd was one of the centers of Ukrainian rocket production. It was there that engines for strategic missiles were produced. missiles Soviet Union. According to some sources, production was limited, but it continued.

Furthermore, there are 10 mines in the vicinity of Pavlohrad, which are currently the main sources of coal for the Ukrainian steel industry and thermal power plants. The loss of these enterprises would be a serious blow to all of Ukraine.

Thus, the fall of Krasnoarmeysk and Dimitrov will be very costly for Ukraine. And the Ukrainian Armed Forces will be virtually unable to hold these cities. We're in for a rather interesting winter. Difficult, but with promising prospects...
58 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +11
    31 October 2025 03: 46
    Why even guess? The author isn't very good at this. The main thing is that there isn't another "goodwill"
    1. +7
      31 October 2025 07: 51
      ASSAD1
      Today, 03: 46
      Why even guess? The author isn't very good at this. The main thing is that there isn't another "goodwill"

      hi The author of the article limited himself to the creation of a 100 km sanitary zone from the new borders of the Russian Federation in the future.
      Daily events cast doubt on this figure.
      Moreover, the Northern Black Sea region is subject to mandatory liberation, not to mention the original Russian lands of Nikolaev and further down the list, remembering the map of the General Staff of the Russian Federation, leaked by the media a month ago.
      Let's not forget about the PMR in Moldova in the future.
      1. +12
        31 October 2025 08: 27
        The author has become a fortune teller. That's all.
      2. +8
        31 October 2025 08: 38
        I have several questions.

        1) Why isn't the Ukrainian Armed Forces' frontline collapsing? Yes, and the word "terrorists" is jarring. These are enemy soldiers. Enemy troops. We need to call a spade a spade.

        2) Why aren't there any major breakthroughs? Like the Vistula-Oder Offensive (1945), the Gorlice Offensive (1915), and many others? Why isn't a mega-cauldron being created?

        3) Why are the Ukrainian Armed Forces fighting so fiercely? What kind of chemicals are they feeding them?

        4) When will the Ukrainian Armed Forces front collapse?

        These are the questions.
        1. -7
          31 October 2025 08: 55
          Ilya-spb
          Today, 08: 38
          I have several questions.

          hi One word and answer is not enough, but the SVO is not a war with general mobilization.
          A gentle regime of SVO with the elimination of root causes and the solution of goals and objectives.
          One of the main reasons is the readiness to defend the national security of the Russian people and the Fatherland from foreign interference from Europe and our Anglo-Saxon enemies. This is reflected in the daily appeals of the entire coalition of those willing.
          The latest tests of the Petrel, Poseidon, and Hazelnut are demonstrated as harsh signals to use all types of weapons against enemies.
          "He who has ears, let him hear; he who has eyes, let him see." (Matthew 14:1-20).
        2. +10
          31 October 2025 09: 02
          The answer to questions 1 and 3 is the same: because Russians from the outskirts of Russia are fighting us. But why they started fighting us in 23 is something our leaders should figure out and correct.
          At 14-15 there were cauldrons after cauldrons, real cauldrons, but it was mainly the "Westerners" who fought with us there.
          The answer to question 2 is that it seems our leaders don't need "major breakthroughs"...
          1. +2
            2 November 2025 11: 34
            Major breakthroughs are achieved by large masses of troops. The Vistula-Oder Offensive, for example, involved 2000 troops on one side and 800 on the other, respectively. So, the lack of breakthroughs is not surprising. It's also important to consider the disparity in control of the front line then and now. Even satellite monitoring of troop movements alone makes a huge difference in the ability to operate forces.
            The Red Army's official losses in this operation are approximately 40. Is our society prepared for such statistics?
          2. AMG
            0
            7 November 2025 15: 43
            You're exaggerating about the cauldrons of 14-15; the scale and effective forces were insignificant. Remember the battles for the Luhansk and Donetsk airports. And now the military is doing the best it can with such a large force.
        3. +7
          31 October 2025 10: 16
          The author won't answer. Although the answer is obvious. We fight as our capabilities allow—military, human, economic, technological. Why does the enemy fight with such ferocity? They fight for their land—that's what they think.
        4. -4
          31 October 2025 13: 04
          I have exactly the same questions! When will the domino effect finally happen and the Ukrainian Armed Forces' front line crumble?
          My own answer to this question is that our leadership is in no hurry for two reasons:
          1 They take care of our soldiers and try to win with small numbers, without declaring additional mobilization.
          The people of Ukraine must realize everything and rise up; they weren't brainwashed for 20 years for nothing. A quick victory will lead to guerrilla warfare and Banderaism. Moses spent 40 years wandering the desert to eradicate the servile spirit, waiting for three generations to pass. Life moves faster now, but even now, some time is needed for people to rethink what's happening.
          1. +3
            1 November 2025 10: 23
            How do you imagine this "rethinking" in the context of total brainwashing on the topic of "occupiers and the need to protect our dear motherland"?
            1. +2
              2 November 2025 11: 36
              Those who have realized this remain silent even in their kitchens to avoid being taken to the SBU.
          2. +6
            1 November 2025 18: 12
            Yeah, of course they'll reconsider when funerals for relatives come every day and banzher propaganda is poured out on all channels.
            They might have rethought something in the event of a quick, anemic takeover and our propaganda, but a samurai (Putin) has no goal, only a path: denazification, demilitarization, all that slop. So these goals are clearly not taken into account. Could they have moved faster? Of course they could have, if they had taken up Ukraine's energy sector three years ago instead of now, if they hadn't made goodwill gestures, if they hadn't let the captured Azov soldiers go on plane rides with Abramovich. Yes, there are a lot of "ifs," and the life of a Russian soldier (and, by the way, a Russian soldier in the Ukrainian army, too) is far from the top priority here.
        5. +4
          31 October 2025 13: 36
          1) Are there any reasons why it should collapse? Not from TV, but from actual experience. There was an article here the other day about Ukraine's economy not having slumped much compared to 2021, and it's supposedly more stable than ours (according to international organizations, inflation and the Central Bank rate are lower, and economic growth is higher).
          2) Or maybe because we can't? We don't have the technological, numerical, or qualitative superiority we need, and we probably never have. I think the tactical genius of our commanders is also roughly on par.
          3) And on what basis do you think they should disperse? They can talk all they want on our TV about Ukraine being an artificial state, etc., but for Ukrainians, it's their homeland, and they're defending it. We may wish the Ukrainians well, but so far, that only translates into missiles and bombs, which doesn't add to their love. And if you listen to all those "Soloviev Life" shows, they periodically suggest practically slaughtering Ukraine's population...
          4) It could be in 5 minutes, it could be tomorrow, it could be never. We need to watch less TV and listen to fortune tellers like the author. If you think about it, even "busification" isn't out of the ordinary. Essentially, our neighbors have declared mobilization, which is always a forced process! They're not shoving random people onto buses, but those who received a summons and failed to show up without reason. Let me remind you that even during peacetime conscription, such measures are provided for, and if you recall our recent laws on military registration, even such measures could seem "gentle" in the event of a "second wave."
          P.S.: The SVO has shown that "the emperor has no clothes," but they continue to shove "there are no analogs" and other nonsense in our faces. The scariest part is the answer to the question, "Why is this happening?" Is it because there's nothing we can do to fix it, or because we're incapable of it?
          1. -2
            31 October 2025 14: 31
            "1) Are there any reasons why it should collapse? Not from TV, but from actual facts. There was an article here the other day, saying that Ukraine's economy hasn't really slumped much compared to 2021..."

            - There are prerequisites, even though my information is from TV, but yours was not collected personally either.
            - there is an advantage at least in human and technical reserves.
            - I decided on the basis that I consider all Slavs Russian, and all the lands conquered by our ancestors my historical homeland. It's just that at some point, we began to have different rulers and different TV programs.
            - Regarding their mobilization in Ukraine, I think that the number of mobilized people cannot be infinite and the flow will dry up in the near future.
            - Regarding foreign aid, it will immediately decrease as soon as they realize that the money will not be returned and they will not be able to get anything there, besides, they have enough of their own problems.
          2. 0
            2 November 2025 03: 16
            Quote: parma
            There was an article here the other day about Ukraine's economy not having slumped much compared to 2021, and it's supposedly more stable than ours (according to international organizations, inflation and the Central Bank rate are lower, and economic growth is higher).

            Are you serious ?
            About economic growth in\on, about "not having dropped much"?
            Seriously ?
            When the population there has halved since February 2022? In the remaining territory. When the enterprises are idle, not all of them yet, but definitely idle? When all the oil refineries have been destroyed, and now almost all the energy sector? And what's more, it turns out they have:
            Quote: parma
            economic growth is higher).

            Or are you talking about negative growth?
            Quote: parma
            the economy...it seems to be more stable than ours

            what Are we really talking about Ukraine now?
            Quote: parma
            Or maybe it's because we can't? We don't have the technological, numerical, or qualitative advantage in the required volume, and we probably never have.

            And again, deceit.
            Compared to whom "we didn't have"?
            Compared to Ukraine? Or to the British coalition of sixes, 50+?
            These will be different comparisons.
            Only the lackeys are already admitting that even the entire collective farm can't survive the war. There's neither funding nor logistical support.
            Especially when the ranks of the sixes left the United States, led by Trump.
            Quote: parma
            I think that the tactical genius of the commanders is also at about the same level.

            Well, yes, I suppose. Only on the other side of the front line (I don't know about you), all the NATO headquarters plan operations and provide support, while we have our own, homespun General Staff.
            So again, it turns out there is nothing shameful.
            Especially when we win, and not the entire NATO+ collective farm.
            Quote: parma
            Even "busification" isn't out of the ordinary. Essentially, the neighbors have been mobilized, which is always a forced process! They're not shoving random people onto buses, but those who received a summons and didn't show up without reason.

            That's just how it is. And how would you feel about such a drive to the Shopping Center?
            Quote: parma
            and if we recall our latest laws on military registration, even such measures may seem “gentle” in the event of a “second wave.”

            Now this is already tantamount to defamation. Although this is only a liability for citizens.
            Quote: parma
            The SVO showed that "the king has no clothes"

            It showed. She showed a lot about power, the vertical, towers and the fauna in them.
            But the SVO also showed something else.
            Quote: parma
            They keep shoving "no analogs" in our faces

            Nonsense is the vertical's favorite pet, and they love to flaunt it and show it off. But on the other hand, there aren't any analogues yet. You know, like those same pictures and cartoons that everyone's already armed with. And how did this happen?
            Quote: parma
            Because nothing can be fixed anymore

            There is much that can no longer be fixed.
            But some things are quite possible. Take a rule and rule it.
            Quote: parma
            or because they are not capable?…

            And here, as in the parable, old wineskins are not capable, because new wine is needed.
            Or the tried and true old one.
          3. AMG
            0
            6 November 2025 21: 09
            So, in your opinion, we shouldn't trust any official information, but rather carefully read your writings. It's almost like Müller (the film's hero), who said that you can't trust anyone... but you can trust him. And explain who this "naked king" is, and what exactly are they trying to sell you? It's also worth knowing that Ukraine's population is far from homogeneous. Russians have always constituted a significant portion, if not the majority. Since Tsarist times, people from neighboring Russian provinces have traveled to mines and factories, especially in the eastern territories, to work. During Soviet times, specialists and university graduates went on assignments. For example, Sevastopol was rebuilt, among others, by Komsomol members from Moscow and Leningrad, many of whom remained there. And regarding "busification," you've made a breakthrough with your explanation. Even the Ukrainian media hadn't thought of it before.
        6. -1
          1 November 2025 09: 47
          Questions from a child who can't see reality. Almost everyone in this thread is like that...
        7. 0
          1 November 2025 18: 02
          What do you expect from Staver? He's a paid propagandist, hence the terrorists, hence the "Krasnoarmeysk" [name], even though Pokrovsk is an old Russian name for a Russian city. The units trapped there, by the way, aren't Azov punitive forces, but actual enemy combat units that haven't been observed engaging in any particular lawlessness.
          The Ukrainian front is still far from collapsing, but that moment is inexorably approaching. Something tells me, however, that the Europeans won't let this happen and will slowly begin to fill the front with their mercenaries.
        8. +4
          1 November 2025 18: 42
          Answers:
          1 - RF are focused on maximum efficiency in eliminating the second NATO army. The Ukraine still can send some 350'000 net from the 18-25 cohort into battle. To process them at 1500/day will take an extra 230 days at an efficiency ratio of 1:15.
          2 - For the same reason as 1 - to optimize own losses and not to aggravate China and India as key economic pillars of the Russian economy. RF could systematically destroy the psychological backbone of the Galicians by hitting different objects- yet that could be used by the empire against Russia very effectively. Right now, the world is clearly on Russia's side- and that is a good thing.
          3- This is simple: indoctrination and repurcussions on family members etc. The same reason why SS divisions fought even when everyone knew that the Reich was finished. Nothing special.
          4- I can give you a fairly precise answer on that oone based on our models:
          The dynamical parameters show that by 31st Dec 26 all of the 4 Oblasts will be 100% liberated.
          Plus 35% of Charkov and 25% of Sumy and 21% od Dneprpetrovsk.

          In July 2027 34% of Nikolaev and 33% of Odessa will be liberated while Charkov stands at 75% and Sumy at 50%.
          In December 2027 Poltava, Sumy, Dneprpetrovsk and Poltava will be 100% liberated - that means also their share on the West bank. Chernigov 50% and Odessa and Nikolaev 60% and 55%.

          Finally in March 2028 All the listed Oblasts will be 100% liberated.
          If RF wanted the rest of the Ukraine could be fully occupied by June 28.

          The assumptions are, that the SMO is pursued as it was over the past 12 months.
          That means that the Galicians will have lost another 1'186'500 fighters between Dec 25 and March 28 while Russia will have lost another 79'100 soldiers.
          But this means that the Ukraine needed to recruit another 700'000 fighters and as stated there are only 350'000 left in the cohort of 18-25 year olds.
          It will work if the Ukraine squeezes the last halfway capable and willing man from its remaining population- but then 0 soldiers would remain.

          So collapse in the sense of break down of the Galician army could happen when the last 300'000 are in the fields - which would be around the April 11, 2027.
          This is pretty much around the time the city of Odessa will have been liberated.

          So between April 2027 and July 27 the last army of Kiev will inevitably collapse.

          However, as we all know the Americans they will try to prevent Odessa from being taken by all means- they think in terms of coastlines and city trophies.
          So it is to be expected that in December 2026 the empire will come up with an elaborate offer/scheme for Russia.

          Now we know what can be done to collapse resistance sooner:

          If RF does one push into Odessa and takes all of the remaining coastline north of it then the US will give up and call it quits.
          RF could do this in Summer 2026. It would require an extra 50k casualties but save around 30k over a longer term scenario.
        9. 0
          2 November 2025 06: 14
          Why are there no major breakthroughs?

          Technological advances dictate a different tactic. It won't be possible to deploy large forces to the breach site in a short time. Nor will it be possible to organize supplies.
        10. AMG
          0
          6 November 2025 21: 58
          Why do you find the word "terrorists" so offensive? Who was it that shot civilians in the Kursk region and elsewhere? And since when is the word "Enemy" capitalized? You can figure out the second question yourself. Take the front line in kilometers and divide it by the number of troops in 1945 and today. No one will answer questions 3 and 4.
        11. AMG
          0
          7 November 2025 15: 30
          There is one answer to all questions, no matter what, victory will be US!
      3. +4
        31 October 2025 17: 29
        Nikolaev, Odessa, Transnistria... Dreams, dreams. There's no physical possibility, though I really want to. But this just doesn't get through to the rabid public.
        1. +3
          1 November 2025 18: 46
          Disagree: the models show that this will happen as a simple cause effect mechanism IF- but only IF the SMO is continued as it is now and until 2028.
  2. -2
    31 October 2025 04: 19
    Well, the question of Nikolaev and Odessa remains open. But before that, Kherson and Zaporizhia still need to be liberated. So the war will last another five years... And then Europe will rearm and flex its muscles. And the first to go under the knife will be the Balts, Poles, and Romanians.
    1. 0
      1 November 2025 18: 02
      Quote from: FoBoss_VM
      So there will be wars for another five years...
      If the front is stretched as far as it is now, if the desire for a "buffer zone" of 100 kilometers remains, then even ten years won't be enough.
  3. +15
    31 October 2025 04: 22
    No, I'm not even doubting that we're in for an "interesting" winter. They've already raised taxes, and now they're starting to discuss raising tariffs again. And who knows what they'll come up with next. And damned Europe still hasn't frozen over.
    1. 0
      31 October 2025 05: 23
      Quote from turembo
      No, I'm not even doubting that we're in for an "interesting" winter. They've already raised taxes, and now they're starting to discuss raising tariffs again. And who knows what they'll come up with next. And damned Europe still hasn't frozen over.

      It's long been said that a war of attrition is not the way to go! Europe's GDP far exceeds ours, and they won't freeze! But we'll have to tighten our belts! And if the US follows Biden's plan, we may be left with only one option: "the whole world will crumble."
      1. +14
        31 October 2025 07: 23
        Quote: Traveler 63
        What if the US follows Biden's program?
        Basically, there's no Biden path or Trump path. There are the interests of big business, the behind-the-scenes puppeteers, and this applies to everyone involved in global capitalism. In our case, as has long been said, with such forces and such tactics, we can fight for a very long time, to the last Ukrainian or the last Russian. "Milling," grinding who and what—our own resources, the Ukrainian population? The economic might of Europe and the United States far exceeds what our hucksters and optimizers have left of the Soviet Union's might. This is the bitter truth: a shortage of skilled labor and industrial capacity, the looting of strategic reserves from warehouses and arsenals...
        Meanwhile, despite sanctions and military action, Russia's newly minted moneybags are only getting fatter; the number of billionaires has increased. Moreover, while our peasants are fighting frontal assaults on endless villages, these fat cats are trading with the enemy and moving assets abroad. Strange, to say the least. What can we gain from this? The first option is to complete what was started in 1991, ultimately forcing us to accept a shameful ultimatum, completely ruining the Russian economy. Clearly, the West doesn't need a strong Russia, just as it didn't need the USSR; this is in the interests of our enemies. Furthermore, "the whole world will crumble"—what kind of peace is this when the "elite" already has foreign citizenship, palaces, yachts, and bank accounts in the West? They need to get rid of what can rid their world of this rubble. The second, transitional option is pacification, a cessation of hostilities, with the achievements being presented as victory. A couple of years later, a new war will break out, with NATO mobilized and Ukrainian nationalists licking their wounds. A third possibility is that "greed has ruined the sucker." The henpecked treachery of the "elite," the deceitfulness of the West and its "democracy," will become obvious. People's power and a people's army will return to Russia, a power that the billion-mad ghouls will no longer dare to tangle with, and Russia will remain truly independent and great.
        1. +1
          1 November 2025 17: 54
          Per se. The third option, where "people's power and a people's army return to Russia," can only happen after the first or second steps are completed, i.e., after defeat or pacification. There can be no revolution now; the people have not yet reached the limit of humiliation.
          Therefore, we are slowly but surely moving in the direction of the UK's very cunning plan, the goal of which, in short, is to ruin Russia and the EU.
          1. +1
            5 November 2025 06: 45
            Quote: MBRBS
            Per se, the third option, where "people's power and a people's army return to Russia," can only happen after the first or second option is completed,

            That's right, Mikhail. I said it myself: "The henpeckedness and betrayal of the 'elite,' the deceit of the West with its 'democracy,' is becoming obvious." Our people are trusting, unless, of course, you count the outright provocateurs and claqueurs in power. They believe in a good tsar and bad boyars, that constitutional duty and immediate responsibilities are heroic deeds and great favors... Of course, we're grateful we're not Honduras. Nevertheless, just as the newly minted billionaires siphoned resources from Russia and moved assets abroad, they continue to do so, under a constitution essentially dictated by the West.
            We don't need a revolution, it's not real, but a "Caesar" is possible, who will cross his "Rubicon" and, unlike ancient Rome, will return people's power and revive Russia as a truly great and independent country.
  4. +5
    31 October 2025 06: 37
    This kind of analysis raises doubts, if only because:
    If the enemy does not surrender, he is destroyed (c).
    It wasn’t me who said that, but a person with much more management experience and responsibility to history.

    It's clear that it wasn't the author who said it, but when did M. Gorky lead the country and answer to history? He formulated this phrase in an article published in the newspaper Pravda on November 15, 1930. At most, Gorky served as chairman of the Union of Soviet Writers from 1934 to 1936. This is within the school curriculum.
    1. 0
      31 October 2025 09: 13
      Gorky was the chairman of the Union of Soviet Writers from 1934 to 1936.

      Alexey, good morning. I was just watching Konchalovsky's "Chronicles." Gorky isn't the chairman of the Writers' Union, not yet, but according to history, he's already a world-famous Russian writer. He's a small-time punk with a comical Lenin in a bowler hat, missing a red nose, and runs from the police like a pot-bellied Parvus. Like they're part of a circus act.
      And this one said what to do with an enemy who does not surrender?
  5. +2
    31 October 2025 06: 46
    And about the cauldrons. I remember those cauldrons from eight years ago, especially the ones where they created a humanitarian corridor. And the justifications for these corridors, by the authors of VO...
  6. +1
    31 October 2025 07: 14
    In winter, most likely, nothing will change, where, as noted in the adjacent article, Europe will cover everything!
  7. -8
    31 October 2025 07: 57
    Everything has its time, in my opinion, the way the author describes the situation is quite logical, and winter will put everything in its place.
    1. +6
      31 October 2025 10: 19
      For this winter (they'll freeze, starve, and people will run out), we're nodding for the umpteenth time... But, they won't freeze and they won't run out
  8. +2
    31 October 2025 08: 10
    And I imagine the author's face after he reads the comments under his article. And then I thought, where have I seen such an expression and on whom before? I remembered that face of State Duma member Mironov during yesterday's program "Evening with Vladimir Solovyov", when after his completely empty chatter others then spoke. I admit right away, I'm not an ardent fan of Drobnitsky, Yevstafyev, Sidorov, Gigina, etc., who often speak there, but the way Mironov looked at their performance yesterday!!! The way he looked, the look on his face!!! As if I haven't heard anything like this, reasoned and substantiated by knowledge, for ten years! It's obvious that he doesn't have such people in the State Duma, everyone is just pouring from empty to empty, and he himself is only pouring from empty to empty - that's why Mironov has "gone wild" there. And here yesterday, people were speaking directly about the vision of the state's path, and hearing Mironov's face was like seeing the Second Coming and hearing a Voice from there...
  9. +1
    31 October 2025 08: 16
    The eternal Russian questions: "Who is to blame?" and "What is to be done?"
    It's clear that the "British" is to blame for everything, having been messing things up with NATO for hundreds of years. But what's next and where should we go?
    1. +2
      31 October 2025 09: 34
      And in the 17th, 18th, 19th centuries, NATO also did shit, excuse me? Yes
      1. 0
        31 October 2025 09: 43

        That's why I wrote the word "guilty" in quotation marks. hi
        1. +1
          31 October 2025 11: 00
          Yes, indeed, that is clear.
          "And the chapel, excuse me, did I also ruin it?" (c)
          Inspired. laughing hi
      2. 0
        1 November 2025 18: 19
        Did we lose wars to our former provinces in the 17th, 18th, and 19th centuries? I don't recall anything like that. The Empire was growing and growing stronger.
  10. -2
    31 October 2025 09: 14
    The key to understanding Ukraine's future is the term "denazification." The way it's planned to be carried out will determine how events unfold. I think they'll choose the cheapest option.
  11. -2
    31 October 2025 10: 17
    Next, head to Pavlograd, and from there, turn north to Poltava. And there, another route needs to be opened, from the Belgorod area, away from the border, also to Poltava. If these forces join forces, the entire enemy force in the Donbas will be left without supplies, and Kharkiv will be completely encircled. laughing
  12. 0
    31 October 2025 10: 29
    If we had additional forces, reserves, they could be directed in a new direction—"bypassing Kharkov from the northwest," with the objective of not taking or entering Kharkov, but moving along the Vorskla River and taking settlements and road junctions one by one—Bogodukhov, Akhtyrka, Kotelva, Karlovka, Krasnograd. The ring would be complete at Krasnograd.
  13. +2
    31 October 2025 10: 51
    The author's general idea is certainly interesting: to aim towards Dnepropetrovsk
    Firstly, it’s unlikely that the enemy is waiting (it would be more logical to go in the direction of Zaporizhzhia)
    Secondly, such a direction would effectively cut off the entire Zaporizhzhia region and its defense would lose all meaning.

    The only thing that bothers me is the distance and the presence of the main road

    This is my vision from the military strategic couch.
  14. +2
    31 October 2025 17: 56
    "And there are hundreds of kilometers of operational space there." On the other hand, advancing across open terrain (especially in winter) under drone strikes is a non-trivial task.
    1. 0
      2 November 2025 12: 09
      How does it differ from the Zaporizhzhia direction?
  15. +5
    1 November 2025 12: 28
    The situation is somewhat reminiscent of the situation of our units and formations in Kherson. I wrote about this. From a military standpoint, the position on the right bank of the Dnieper was difficult logistically, and therefore difficult to defend.


    Author, aren't you ashamed to lie to your readers' faces?
    October 23, 2022, I think everyone remembers this.
    https://topwar.ru/203733-budet-li-sovremennaja-kurskaja-bitva-o-situacii-pod-hersonom.html
    It is already clear that General Surovikin is not going to surrender Kherson. There will be a very serious and bloody battle. It is quite possible that the last battle, a modern-day Battle of Kursk. After which the Ukrainian Armed Forces may lose their "Armored Armies" (Western support) and will retreat.

    This is what you wrote.

    And here's what you wrote 3,5 years ago:
    March 25 2022 year.
    https://topwar.ru/192710-nachinaem-vystraivat-novoe-gosudarstvo.html
    After the first day of the operation, it became clear that the Ukrainian army was nothing serious. And after Russia cleared most of the most important military installations, it seems to me that there will be no real resistance.


    "I'm an artist, that's how I see it"?
    1. +3
      1 November 2025 18: 26
      He's not an artist, he's a paid propagandist... You could basically burn his article down from the first two sentences—it's already clear who wrote it. Probably shouldn't read it; cluttering your brain with other people's lies is a pretty poor idea.
  16. +1
    1 November 2025 17: 21
    Ukraine, or whatever the remaining territory will be called, must become purely continental. The remaining territory could be transferred to some form of control or protectorate, possibly through special agreements with a number of non-Russophobic neighboring states, in order to preserve our human and other resources, to attract them into our sphere of interests, our security, and our economic ties. For example, Hungary and Slovakia. An attempt should be made to create a coalition of states to denazify the territory, committing to the restoration and preservation of its original historical, spiritual, and cultural traditions. This could be a significant blow to the unity of NATO and the EU, their policies of Russophobia. It will be imperative to pressure Romania and Moldova to make concessions to Gagauzia and Transnistria regarding their choice of form of state self-organization. The latter will be possible if we form a diplomatic alliance with the Hungarians and Slovaks to protect the rights and self-determination of the peoples and territories of western Ukraine and Moldova. They're afraid that with the next leadership change in Hungary and Slovakia, the political vector will shift. Of course, it's necessary, but I think the prospect of establishing special control over territories in western Ukraine populated by and culturally close to the Hungarian and Slovak peoples will give the current moderate leaders of their countries a significant advantage, potentially enticing radical elements to emerge there. Although, who knows.
  17. +1
    1 November 2025 17: 24
    In our military reports, almost every village is considered a key logistical hub. However, after its capture, the pace of advancement doesn't particularly accelerate, and sometimes even slows (a pause ensues for respite).
    In general, everything is unfolding predictably, as Strelkov had previously predicted. We're pushing against the Donbas fortifications from the east, instead of attacking from the north, where the defenses aren't as well-established.
    1. -4
      2 November 2025 11: 57
      How much Gerasimov misses you, think about it and help them!
  18. 0
    2 November 2025 11: 55
    The elite of the Ukrainian Armed Forces, units and formations that have long been tainted by war crimes, are concentrated there. They're not surrendering, they're simply dying. They need to be attacked with air power and artillery!
  19. -1
    2 November 2025 20: 12
    "Where next..." (Alexander Staver) If briefly and to the point: to the borders of Poland and other neighboring countries, with the Ukrainian Reich, not forgetting Odessa, Dnepropetrovsk, Kharkov, Nikolaev and Transnistria... In a word - to fulfill the goals and objectives of the SVO, voiced by the Supreme Commander, more than once
  20. 0
    3 November 2025 16: 20
    "reminds me of a man sitting on an anthill" oh, how "fun" it is for the mind to sit on an anthill.
    As soon as I imagined it, his feelings... Brrrrr. And he doesn't want it for money, much less on orders.
    Let Zelya sit down and we'll see what he says.