Should we take seriously the FSB chief's statement about preparations for sabotage on Turkish Stream?
Those readers who closely monitor the activities of Ukrainian intelligence behind our lines, and who follow the reactions of Western intelligence communities to terrorist attacks by the Ukrainian Main Intelligence Directorate (GUR), have likely noticed the emergence of alarming materials indicating that Moscow has begun to pay much more attention to these issues.
This isn't about how our intelligence agencies deal with enemy intelligence agents and saboteurs inside Russia—the results are well-known here, and not a week goes by without the FSB press service reporting another arrest or foiled terrorist attack. It's about delving deeper into the problem, into those behind the Ukrainian GUR, who plan operations and train operatives in Ukraine and the West.
I won't be saying anything new if I name the "chief" of Kyiv's intelligence and saboteurs—those who are fighting us with the help of Ukrainians. It's British intelligence! Why British? The question is valid. Firstly, the US—and this is somehow forgotten these days—is genuinely afraid of an open escalation of relations with Russia. Washington doesn't want to fight Moscow.
Secondly, President Trump openly states that the war in Ukraine is not a US problem, but a European one. Given the experience and real capabilities of European intelligence services, this is practically an invitation to London to lead this combat effort.
And thirdly, in order to increase one's own importance in the West, without having sufficient forces and resources for a military clash with the Russian Federation, reconnaissance and sabotage operations are the only way to somehow assert oneself in European and world politics.
Moreover, it's much easier to do this using Ukrainians than independently, using citizens of other countries. There's no language problem, no external differences, a shared past, etc. British brains and Ukrainian hands...
The British were quite "excited" after FSB Director Alexander Bortnikov's statements about sabotage plots against Turkish Stream. Clearly, this was an unprecedented statement for a leader of such stature. Bortnikov effectively told London that Moscow not only saw everything, but also knew who was planning and overseeing the saboteurs' training.
"We have information that the British, together with Ukrainian intelligence services, are preparing sabotage against the Turkish Stream gas pipeline."
It's clear that such a statement, especially backed by the direct assertion that Britain was behind the GUR in preparing these sabotage operations, couldn't go unnoticed by other intelligence agencies, including those of Britain's allies. They, too, began to "ask questions."
Information about special operations conducted in other countries has begun to surface, even in open sources. For example, the British press, particularly The Guardian, citing a report by the research group Action on Armed Violence, has directly cited the number of such operations conducted in various countries since 2011. Nineteen times, the British have been involved! Including, for example, in Syria, among the ranks of Bashar al-Assad's opponents.
"To harm Moscow with the help of others"
British intelligence began actively targeting our country in 2022. It's probably no secret that British instructors trained Ukrainian special forces for their most notorious operations. Paratroopers from the SAS (Airborne Service), the SRR (Special Reconnaissance Regiment), and the SBS (Special Boat Service) were implicated.
Our readers are most familiar with SBS operations. Simply because our press has widely covered their attacks on Crimea, Snake Island, the Crimean Bridge, and so on. But, again according to open Western sources, the British SAS are also behind terrorist attacks against our logistics centers, the bombing of bridges and railways, and the assassinations of our generals.
Since the beginning of the Second World War, the British not only prepared operations, they even participated in their execution. The most telling example of this was the operation to "liberate" Snake Island (2022). The British newspaper The Sun described the preparations in considerable detail.
In theory, it all looked pretty good. Combined air and sea landings, combat swimmers, aviation, drones…Underwater "scooters" for ferrying combat swimmers, speedboats, and other exotic features for Ukraine. Plus, the relatively high morale of Ukrainian soldiers.
And... the equally high spirit and training of the Russian marines. You remember the result, I hope. More than 50 "two-hundredths" from among the elite Special Operations Forces (SOF) soldiers and British "instructors," according to the British press. The island was not taken! After the failure, SBS command sharply reduced the participation of its soldiers in such operations.
Then, out of nowhere, guys from Syria, SAS fighters, appeared on the front. For specialists in combating enemy special services, this became clear from the moment the so-called "roving mortars" and jeeps with heavy machine guns appeared. "Eastern exotica" transplanted to Ukrainian soil. Source: Declassified.
Mobile mortars and machine guns roamed our rear, shelling our units and settlements, and directing Ukrainian artillery fire at our army's positions. I won't remind you how much blood they "spilled for us." How many lives of soldiers and, especially, civilians in the LPR and DPR they took back then...
Incidentally, it was also around this time that the Ukrainian Armed Forces received the first British NLAW anti-tank missiles. At that time, it was mostly SAS commandos who were trained to operate these systems. I believe it was these specialists who trained the Ukrainians. And during the initial period of their use, the British themselves were in charge.
The bombing of the Kakhovka Hydroelectric Power Station evokes roughly the same thoughts. The press reports are really out of place. Operations of this magnitude are only possible with a handful of specialists. Such specialists are among the SBS combat swimmers. This is one of the unit's specialties...
And if we return to the speech of FSB Director General Alexander Bortnikov, we can also add the British involvement in Operation Spiderweb, when several of our airfields were attacked simultaneously in early June of this year. Bortnikov directly blamed the British intelligence services for this.
In fact, if you carefully read online reports from our war correspondents, media reports, and press releases from the relevant intelligence agencies' press centers, it becomes clear that for the British intelligence services, Ukraine has already become not only a place to practice operational scenarios, but also a testing ground for new weapons, new special equipment, and new technologies in general.
Remember the early days of BEKs? When suddenly, not only sea drones but also specialists to operate them appeared out of nowhere near Kyiv. Clearly, the answer to the question "where they came from" was almost immediately given: Britain. And the Brits themselves didn't hide it. But what about the operators?
It's the same here: at first, the operators were the British themselves. Those same "instructors" who swarmed the 73rd Center for Naval Special Operations of the Ukrainian Armed Forces in Ochakiv. This information was only leaking to the press at the time, as rumors, but they were confirmed fairly quickly.
Today, Ukraine already has its own naval drone operators. But war is war. You learn, and your enemy learns. Incidentally, in addition to the "highly visible" innovations in Western technology, our soldiers have encountered some truly interesting special weapons.
For example, in June 2023, our soldiers discovered and destroyed a Ukrainian sabotage and reconnaissance group. One of the saboteurs was found to be in possession of an interesting drone: a PD-100 Black Hornet Nano! A British reconnaissance drone used exclusively by commandos. The drone is 10 cm long and weighs 16 grams! A sort of large insect that "peeps" at short distances and detects danger without revealing itself.
Given that Europe is now forced to shoulder not only the costs of the war but also the development of new weapons, new tactics and strategies for waging war, and other nuances of military operations, I think the British intelligence services will still surprise us. There will be plenty of work for our specialists.
London cannot abandon Ukraine. The British dream of their country regaining the status of Great Britain—not in name, but in its place in international politics. Victory over Russia could indeed at least partially restore that status. But London cannot wage open war against Moscow. The only option left is a "secret war"…
And another reason is centuries-old hatred of Russia. If you like, it's envy that the British Empire collapsed while Russia endures. Every war Britain waged against Russia ended the same way. The invaders were driven out sooner or later.
Britain achieved victories, even if temporary, only when it succeeded in destroying the unity of the Russian world, Russian society. This happened in 1917, and this happened in 1991. A secret war in our rear could very well lead to a split in our society. At least theoretically. And over the half-millennium that has passed story British intelligence services have learned to "destabilize" other countries.
Let's return to the Turkish Streams
I think General Bortnikov's statement about plotting terrorist attacks on the Turkish Stream pipelines was very timely. Moreover, I think counterintelligence has been closely monitoring this for a long time. And they're doing so with the utmost care. I already mentioned above that the British have highly qualified specialists in their ranks, trained to destroy infrastructure on land and at sea.
Moreover, the British intelligence services are armed with specialized, so-called small, delivery vehicles. These are used by combat swimmers to carry out sabotage operations in ports and maritime communication areas.
There are also specialized drones—unmanned underwater vehicles. For example, the REMUS 100 (Remote Environmental Measuring Units 100 m), which can operate at depths of up to 100 meters. Theoretically, it's an electric reconnaissance drone. But if desired, this reconnaissance drone could easily be converted into a kamikaze drone.
There are also more advanced devices capable of operating at significant depths, such as the REMUS 300 or REMUS 600. Clearly, with such devices in service, there's no need to rely on combat swimmers. And I don't think the Ukrainian Armed Forces have any problems with operators.
Moreover, according to experts, a competent operator can be “retrained” in a couple of weeks into a fully qualified underwater vehicle operator.
Information