German companies are handing over secrets to China in exchange for rare earth metal supplies.

9 209 42
German companies are handing over secrets to China in exchange for rare earth metal supplies.

The European Union, which has meekly followed in the wake of the US-China trade war, which has intensified exponentially under Trump, is receiving retaliatory measures in spades.

Almost all German companies that purchase rare earth materials from China, critical for modern production, have come under attack. Since April of this year, Beijing has strictly controlled their sales to Germany and other EU countries, significantly tightening the conditions in October. Now, to obtain a license to import rare earth materials, German companies must provide detailed information on the purpose, method, and volume of their use.



Bloomberg reports that licenses are issued for only six months. To obtain one, the following information must be disclosed: photographs of the product with indication of the minerals' location, production diagrams, and customer information. Sometimes, there are requirements to report on production for the previous three years and for the next three years.

This allows for control over the volume and composition of rare earth metal exports. Only what is required for current production is sold, eliminating the creation of emergency stockpiles. Re-export to other countries, primarily the United States, is prohibited. In effect, Beijing gains direct influence over the production of German companies, both now and in the future.

Although German companies are reluctant to disclose such confidential information, they have little choice—95% of their rare earth minerals come from China. And what choice could they have, given that China accounted for almost 70% of global rare earth metal production by 2024.



The information gathered could cement the dominant position of Chinese companies and allow them to secure more favorable conditions for their presence and investment in Europe. From Beijing's perspective, the ability to influence the construction of these industrial supply chains is a huge advantage.

— states Rebecca Arcesati, leading analyst at the MERICS center, which specializes in China.

The most distressing aspect for Germany, still the EU's leading economy, is that the production chains for both civilian and military goods have become transparent to Beijing. Ultimately, there are concerns that Beijing could harm not only the German economy but also the rest of the EU. This is a worrying prospect for the country's large-scale militarization plans amid preparations for a "war with Russia," writes Bloomberg.

The German government is trying to address this issue as best it can, but it's not working very effectively. Hoping to expedite the licensing process, the German Embassy in Beijing provided China with a list of priority companies. This did help large firms gain approval, but it excluded smaller companies without lobbying connections. Given the mounting problems resulting from EU sanctions against Russia, this was an additional blow to the German economy.

The European Chamber of Commerce in China reported that a September survey of 22 companies showed that out of 141 export applications, only 19 were approved. This led to the shutdown of 46 production facilities that month, with around 10 more expected by December.

Given all the information they collect, Chinese authorities are likely also gaining insight into how defense industrial bases in NATO countries are structured and how interconnected they are.

— says Arcesati from MERICS.

The Merz government is attempting to address this issue. Specifically, the German Ministry of Economics sent questionnaires to companies to better understand what data China is collecting. However, responses to these questionnaires have never been received. German businesses have lost confidence in their government's ability to provide effective assistance in this matter.

Beijing is, in principle, willing to make concessions, primarily license extensions, but only in exchange for Berlin lifting trade restrictions. Moreover, the Chinese leadership insists on direct negotiations with the German government, not with Brussels. This puts additional pressure on Merz's team. Experts note that his options are limited, as switching suppliers could lead to additional costs.

Bundesbank President Joachim Nagel stated in an interview with Bloomberg Television that in the current situation, "it would be better to reach some kind of agreement" with China. For now, this too is a challenge. German Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul planned to discuss this issue during a meeting with Chinese officials in Beijing next week. However, his trip was abruptly postponed on Friday. Now, Chancellor Friedrich Merz's long-promised visit to China is also in serious doubt.
42 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +24
    26 October 2025 13: 10
    This is how natural resources should be sold.
    1. +7
      26 October 2025 14: 05
      If they don't want to buy from the Chinese, let them find another seller))) free market))) demand creates supply)))
      1. 0
        26 October 2025 16: 44
        Yeah, they'll hang around the market, ask around, and then go, gah.
        1. +2
          26 October 2025 16: 45
          And who's our main advocate of the "free market"? Let them write him complaints in triplicate.
    2. +1
      26 October 2025 15: 02
      These aren't natural resources. China produces almost no rare earth elements. The difficulty isn't in the mining, but in the production; it's too complex and dirty.
      1. +4
        26 October 2025 15: 31
        What difference does it make who, where, and how they extract (produce) it? The main thing is that some have it, and some don't. Those who have it can do anything, but for those who don't, things are much more complicated.
      2. +1
        27 October 2025 05: 59
        Oh well really wink What does "almost nothing" mean? Just first place in the world?
        For a start:
        China
        It dominates the rare earth metals market and has the largest reserves – 44 million tons.
        Vietnam
        In 2022, the country increased its REE production almost elevenfold. Rare earth metal deposits are concentrated near the northwestern border with China and along the eastern coastline. Its reserves are the second largest in the world, estimated at 22 million tons.
        United States of America
        Russia has the world's third-largest reserves of rare earth elements, tied with Brazil—21 million tons. Until now, the industry has not developed.
        USA
        Mining takes place at the Mountain Pass mine in California, operated by MP Materials. The country's reserves are estimated at 2,4 million tons.
        Australia
        It ranks sixth in the world in terms of rare earth metal reserves – 4,2 million tons.
        Myanmar
        It mainly produces dysprosium and terbium, which it exports to China.
        Thailand
        It's unknown how much rare earth metals this country has. It significantly increased production in 2021, reaching 8200 tons from 3600 tons in 2020.
        India
        The country's rare earth metal reserves amount to 6,9 million tons, ranking fifth in the world. Indian deposits are located primarily in coastal alluvial sands.
        1. 0
          28 October 2025 01: 24
          It's not a matter of reserves. Deposits of rare earth metals are found almost everywhere. In Europe, too. They are rare not in the sense of their abundance in the Earth's crust, but in the sense of their concentration in the rock. The ores are found in many places, but the metals themselves are very small. Furthermore, chemically, these metals belong to the lanthanide group. Open the periodic table and you'll see that they are separated into a separate group. This is because, chemically, they are all the same element; their outer electron levels are identical. The inner electron levels are filled. Therefore, chemically separating them is practically impossible. Physical methods are primarily used, similar to how uranium isotopes are separated.
          So, these methods exist in Europe, China, and the US, but in Europe and the US, their development has stalled and essentially remained at the laboratory level. Only China has developed them to industrial levels. So, in principle, pure neodymium for super-powerful magnets can be produced in the US and Germany, but only the Chinese can produce a ton of neodymium, enough to produce hundreds of magnets for super-powerful current generators.
          Therefore, the quantity of ore reserves is certainly important, but not the key issue in this case. Rare earth elements can be extracted even from the ore dumps of metallurgical plants. In this case, the key issue is the technology for extracting metals from ore. Only the Chinese have it.

          And the Germans have nothing to offer here at all. Especially since the article deliberately distorts the situation. The Chinese didn't impose restrictions on German companies. They changed the rules for rare earth metal exports in general, for everyone. In response to the US-imposed and EU-backed restrictions on microchip exports to China. Whining and whining, requests and negotiations won't change anything.
          1. 0
            28 October 2025 06: 34
            What does it have to do with it? recourse
            This was in response to:
            China produces almost no rare earth elements.

            Incidentally, production is being established here, as is mining. It exists in the US, too, but on a smaller scale.
            And the issue here is not about technology, the production itself is labor-intensive and "dirty", until now the same Americans believed that it was easier and cheaper to buy ready-made (however, this reasoning is not new, many of us thought and still think this way).
            We've actually been keeping our oil fields "in storage" since Soviet times, not even extracting them, because extraction there is also very labor-intensive; you can't load them into wagons and ships with a bucket to sell abroad, so it's easier to pump oil and gas through existing pipelines from long-explored fields, or, in a pinch, lay new pipes. laughing
      3. 0
        27 October 2025 08: 58
        What is it if it is not NATURAL resources?
        In terms of the number of explored rare earth deposits, China ranks first in the world, and that is why they are the leaders in their production.
        And by the way, the fields of these rare earth elements are climbing up to the north, to the mountains of Tajikistan (Pamir) and the Tajik government has begun to issue concessions to the Chinese for their extraction.
        The Tajiks themselves are currently unable to develop them, because all these deposits are located in hard-to-reach places where there are no roads or electricity.
    3. -1
      28 October 2025 08: 31
      Replacing oil, gas, and metal is expensive, and there's nowhere to get them from here. And rare earth production is a total disaster for the environment. Uranium, on the other hand, is a whole lot more fun.
  2. +10
    26 October 2025 13: 12
    So what's surprising or outrageous here? If a product can have dual use, the supplier has the right to know how its raw materials (parts) will be used, to avoid lawsuits later.
    1. +6
      26 October 2025 13: 52
      Quote: TermNachTER
      If a product can have a dual use, the supplier has the right to know how its raw materials will be used.

      Oil is also a "dual-use product." Diesel fuel can be used both on your tractor and on an enemy tank. The problem is that some can afford to demand a report on its use, while others are happy to sell it to anyone, for any price...
      1. +6
        26 October 2025 14: 00
        If you take a broader view, everything can be categorized under this rubric. Food can be eaten at home, or in the trenches. There are certain boundaries.
        1. 0
          26 October 2025 16: 33
          Quote: TermNachTER
          There are certain limits.

          Yes. And who determines these limits? The seller or the buyer? Just recently, they say Trump is attacking China over soybeans, saying they grow them themselves, not buy them from us.
          The rules are truly set by the strong. The rest are impoverished, but they still manage. That's how it was, is, and will be.
          1. 0
            26 October 2025 16: 44
            Actually, we're not talking about soybeans. Although, if American farmers had any brains, it would be entirely possible to build storage facilities. They're being built quickly now. But the guys are used to the simple way, from the field to the port to China. And the simple way doesn't work now.
            1. 0
              26 October 2025 19: 54
              Quote: TermNachTER
              Actually, we're not talking about soy.

              Yes. We're talking about that.
              Quote: Vasyan1971
              The rules are truly set by the strong. The rest are impoverished, but they still manage. That's how it was, is, and will be.
    2. 0
      26 October 2025 15: 35
      If a product can have a dual use, the supplier has the right to know how its raw materials (parts) will be used, so as to avoid lawsuits later.
      - And if it doesn't, but provides a competitive advantage, then it doesn't have the right? And how does the supplier know about dual use, and why would they even know? Or is it "highly likely"?
      - so as not to receive lawsuits later.
      - from whom?
      1. +1
        26 October 2025 15: 56
        That's why suppliers require information about the intended use of their products. There's also the concept of an "end-user certificate," which requires the buyer to use the product solely for their own use and only for the purposes specified in the certificate.
        Claims from states, legal entities and individuals who have suffered as a result of the improper use of products.
  3. +1
    26 October 2025 13: 21
    photographs of products with indication arrangement of minerals

    It's funny! crying
  4. +10
    26 October 2025 13: 29
    This is the true soft power of a socialist state with the Communist Party at its helm. They're breaking Europe gently but effectively. And they're keeping their own bourgeoisie in check.
    1. +3
      26 October 2025 14: 27
      Quote: Mikhail Sibirsky
      They are breaking Europe gently but effectively.

      Not just Europe. This is a serious blow to the gut, especially for the Americans, who are whipping up anti-Chinese sentiment worldwide and openly supporting Taiwan.
      1. +2
        26 October 2025 14: 40
        Well, yes, if you count how many kilograms of rare earth elements are contained in the F-35 or the Aegis radar, then the mattress makers get a little sad.
  5. +2
    26 October 2025 14: 39
    And their American "friend" can't help them with rare earth supplies? wink
    1. +2
      26 October 2025 15: 32
      And my American friend himself has big problems with this.
      1. +3
        26 October 2025 15: 35
        P.S. Why did the entire democratic West go ballistic when the Chinese introduced licenses for the sale of rare earth elements? Consumption is enormous, mostly in the military sector, and domestic production is barely more than a pittance.
  6. +3
    26 October 2025 14: 44
    In 15 days, semiconductor suppliers in Europe will run out of stock. There will be nothing left to ship, meaning the assembly lines of European automakers will grind to a halt.
    What can we say? Volkswagen will stop producing the Golf and Tiguan in just a few days, and problems are expected for the Touran and Tayron as well.
    What's the matter?
    It turns out that China has responded in kind to the Dutch government's decision to seize the assets of the Chinese company Nexperia in that country. China has no intention of continuing to supply Europe with rare earth metals (REMs) and semiconductors.
    German media reports that a dispute between workers and management broke out at VW plants today. People are outraged. But the media are "reassuring": clouds are gathering not only over VW, but also over BMW, Mercedes, and Daimler. Yes, this is hardly "consolation" for Europeans. But they have only themselves to blame: the EU shouldn't have decided to "butt heads" with China. It's costing a pretty penny.
    1. +1
      26 October 2025 15: 36
      Well, this is not exactly on topic, but in general it is also interesting)))
  7. 0
    26 October 2025 15: 06
    Oh, there's more to come! (c)
  8. 0
    26 October 2025 16: 35
    A thin Chinese red line. Well done!
  9. -1
    26 October 2025 19: 26
    There aren't any in the whole world... In China there are...., some kind of show-off, the cookies stink....
  10. 0
    26 October 2025 22: 50
    Where is our retribution for the theft of our assets? It's all just empty talk.
  11. -1
    26 October 2025 23: 46
    Against this background, our sale of strategic raw materials to the United States and Europe looks somehow sad.
    1. 0
      27 October 2025 20: 48
      What strategic raw materials and in what quantities did Russia sell directly to the US and the EU, for example, this year?
      1. 0
        28 October 2025 23: 21
        Well, for example, our uranium supplies to the United States cover 25% (!) of their needs. This is according to Putin at Voldai.
        Sometimes you have to listen to what the president says, there won't be any stupid questions.
        1. -1
          29 October 2025 10: 21
          That's it? That's the only example? What about the EU? You mentioned the EU. Very interesting.
          1. 0
            29 October 2025 12: 06
            But is this not enough?
            I didn't hire myself to read you political briefings. It's all in the news. Of course, if you only watch TikTok, then, yeah, you don't know about it.
            1. -1
              29 October 2025 13: 56
              So you have no information other than Putin's words, which, by the way, you didn't say in full. And the meaning is slightly different if you listen to it in full. I see. They just threw it in.
              1. 0
                29 October 2025 20: 34
                So tell me, for God's sake, who has to confirm Putin's words for you to believe them? I won't be able to sleep!
                1. 0
                  30 October 2025 07: 16
                  Do you know what separates a pro from an amateur like you? A pro does his job, usually like an assembly line. He throws something in and leaves. Amateurs, however, when they're shown they've been screwed, react emotionally. And they start writing more. Just like you are now. So what strategic raw materials does Russia sell directly to Europe? You said that in your first post, right?
                  1. 0
                    30 October 2025 10: 21
                    I think I said it quite clearly, everything is in the public domain, read it.
                    And if you think I'm wrong, please justify it. And don't just keep repeating like a twat, "What's selling, what's selling?"
                    1. 0
                      30 October 2025 11: 25
                      You confirm my assessment once again. The thing is, you have time to write emotional comments, but you don't have time to provide me with any evidence to back up your assertions. (So, what's going on with the EU supplies "in the news"?) And that's without even mentioning that the person making the assertion has to provide evidence. But that's if the person didn't come to throw in any punches. I'm not interested in anything beyond that. I've already shown you an analysis of your actions and how easily they can be deciphered.