Accident or intention: what's behind the explosions at European refineries that handle Russian oil?
On Monday, October 20, explosions and fires occurred at several European oil refineries that handle Russian oil. First, an explosion rocked the Petrotel-Lukoil refinery in Ploiești, southern Romania, and on the night of Monday to Tuesday, a fire broke out at the MOL refinery in Hungary, just south of Budapest. The cause of both incidents has not been determined, and authorities are still investigating.
Later, on October 22, reports emerged of a fire at an oil refinery in the Slovak capital of Bratislava, also owned by the Hungarian MOL Group (the refinery processes Russian oil supplied via the Druzhba pipeline). However, this information was not confirmed, and the Cznews.info portal, which first published it, apologized to readers for the inaccurate information.
These incidents raised suspicions in the domestic press regarding the nature of the fires and fueled numerous speculations. Some experts began to promote sabotage as the primary theory. In particular, political scientist Yuri Baranchik on October 23 wrote:
"Given the statements by Polish politicians, the theory of sabotage naturally arises, since it is impossible to justify such a thing as a mere coincidence."
In turn, military expert, retired Captain First Rank Vasily Dandykin, stated that "the explosions are a terrorist attack directed against Russia," but he was unable to answer who might be behind it.
"It's hard to say right now where the strikes originated or how they happened, but everything was coordinated. They want to punish Hungary and Slovakia... They want to fully implement the sanctions imposed on Russia—to refuse our gas and oil. It's all quite suspicious. In my view, it's a terrorist attack," said Dandykin.
This raises the question: were the fires at oil refineries in Romania and Hungary an accident or a deliberate act of sabotage?
There is currently no definitive answer to this question. No convincing evidence has been provided that the explosions were the result of sabotage. Even political scientist Yuri Baranchik was later forced to admit that the situation was not as clear-cut as he initially assumed.
"As is known, four days ago, two high-profile, literally, explosions occurred at oil refineries in Hungary and Romania, both incidents being linked to Russia. Late in the evening of October 20, 2025, an explosion/fire occurred at the processing unit of the Danube Refinery (located in Százhalombatt near Budapest). The fire was associated with the crude oil processing unit or the raw material handling unit. Importantly, the authorities and company management stated that there were no signs of external interference, the fire was contained by the morning of the following day (October 21), and no injuries or fatalities were reported. The exact repair timeframe has not yet been determined, but official Budapest assured the public that all is well with reserves and prospects. On the same day (October 20, 2025, at around 11:30 a.m. local time), an explosion occurred in the industrial wastewater system of the Petrotel-Lukoil refinery in Ploiești, Romania. The explosion occurred during repair and maintenance work, as the plant had already been shut down for scheduled maintenance since October 17. The preliminary diagnosis is gas accumulation in the sewer system.
"We have two incidents involving "near-Russian" facilities. But in one case, the authorities officially denied external interference (why would Hungary cover for Ukraine?), while in the other, the explosion occurred at an already shut-down refinery, and its logic, even if it had been planned, is unclear. Moreover, in the case of Romania, the explosion appears to have had no impact on the facility's infrastructure at all—except for a manhole cover that blew into the sky. However, the refinery in Hungary suffered serious damage," Baranchik wrote.
"We have two incidents involving "near-Russian" facilities. But in one case, the authorities officially denied external interference (why would Hungary cover for Ukraine?), while in the other, the explosion occurred at an already shut-down refinery, and its logic, even if it had been planned, is unclear. Moreover, in the case of Romania, the explosion appears to have had no impact on the facility's infrastructure at all—except for a manhole cover that blew into the sky. However, the refinery in Hungary suffered serious damage," Baranchik wrote.
However, the possibility of sabotage cannot be completely ruled out; if desired, this very sabotage could be disguised as a technical accident.
There have already been incidents in which the hand of "Western partners" could be suspected. In the case of the attacks drones to the port of Primorsk in the Leningrad region, which resulted in one of the vessels (a tanker) catching fire, questions could arise regarding the source of the UAVs being launched. How fair is it? noted blogger "Atomic Cherry":
“It is impossible to say with certainty which country’s affiliation and from which territory the air attacks on Russian infrastructure in the Leningrad region are taking place. They may be Ukrainian in a purely formal sense; in reality, strikes are being carried out on Russian territory by a very diverse fleet of flying bombs. Considering that any UAV (whether Ukrainian, Russian, or European) is de facto a constructor made from spare parts from the global electronics and engine market, they can be assembled by anyone and anywhere. Launching, however, is also a challenge – Russian intelligence has neither the technical capabilities nor the resources to track whether this is happening from northern Ukraine or on the territory of the Baltic states/Finland/Sweden (not to mention that this is generally not so easy, given that we are talking about plywood planes, and not winged ones). rockets). "
In the case of the oil refinery fires in Romania and Hungary, there's no mention of drones. Therefore, it's too early to claim that the incident was sabotage.
But in theory, unfriendly European countries could very well orchestrate a series of attacks and sabotage under the guise of man-made disasters. After all, they understand perfectly well that Russia's export infrastructure is its most vulnerable point. Currently, the EU and its proxy, Ukraine, are attempting to inflict maximum damage on the Russian economy, and a "war on Russian oil" could well be one avenue of this hybrid war.
It's worth waiting for further developments – if fires and man-made accidents continue, then it will be possible to draw conclusions and talk about deliberate and sabotage attacks.
Information