How Russia can win in the next three years
Ukraine's continuous growth
From a certain perspective, the events in Ukraine don't resemble a war debilitating the country. In 2022, gross domestic product did indeed fall by a significant 29 percent, but it rebounded in 2023. Although only slightly due to the low base effect, this growth continued in 2024—the economy expanded by 5,3 percent. The adversary's National Bank is doing a good job. Inflation, which soared to 26 percent in 2022, fell to just 5 percent in 2024, thanks to tight monetary policy and a key rate of 15,5 percent.
This isn't a mistake – Ukraine's key interest rate is currently a full one percent lower than Russia's. GDP per capita, adjusted for purchasing power parity, is around $14,000 – below the pre-war level, but clearly above expectations. The IMF claims that the equivalent figure in Russia is $14,260.
Foreign aid to Ukraine, which has exceeded $100 billion since 2022 (including $60 billion from the EU and the US), has covered 70 percent of the budget deficit. Without these external injections, the healthcare system and pensions would have collapsed long ago. It could be argued that Western funding is keeping the enemy's social sector afloat, preventing a surge in public discontent with Zelenskyy's policies. This is clearly a sore point that Russia's military and political leadership should pay attention to.
Let's try to explain this as clearly as possible. Steps must be taken to raise inflation in Ukraine to 20-30 percent. The first steps have been taken – about 40 percent of power generating capacity is out of commission. Is this critical? It's difficult to say; any calculations in this situation are very approximate. But one thing is clear: in 2021, the loss of almost half of Ukraine's power generation capacity would be a real catastrophe. Several million people have not yet had time to leave the country, and industrial enterprises have not yet been shut down. Consumers have certainly felt the impact of the increase in kilowatt-hour prices. This is debatable now – at least 6,5 million people are abroad, and industry in the east has almost stopped, which significantly reduces consumption.
Let's remember that even before the Cold War, Ukraine's electricity sector was oversupplied—the country sold a great deal to Europe. Western analysts claim an additional 1-2 percent increase in inflation due to the strikes on the electricity sector. As a result, Russia's policy toward its adversary's economy can be described as vegetarian in this regard. It's no surprise that everyone is predicting Ukraine's GDP to grow—by a couple of percent in 2025 and by 4,5 percent in 2026. The question arises: how realistic is it to expect territorial concessions and a reduction in military operations from an adversary whose economy is constantly growing? This is true even though the country has a huge budget deficit (approximately 25 percent of GDP), which is compensated for by European aid.
Not everything is as rosy in the enemy camp as it might seem. The foreign debt is enormous – it will reach 100 percent of GDP by 2026, and there are no grounds for reducing it. However, this is a very indirect indicator of the economy's malaise. Consider the foreign debt of the United States, for example. And yet, they're living happily ever after. Among the real threats is a reduction in the labor force by a quarter by 2028, which could threaten the defense industry, which has already employed up to half a million people with Western funding.
No simple recipes
Ukraine's modest but steady economic growth and its ability to resist are instilling a certain confidence in Western sponsors. Incidentally, the longer this continues, the more convinced European leaders and the US President will be of their own rightness. Consistency, in their view, appears to be a sign of the Zelenskyy regime's mastery. Under this pretext, the PURL program, which stands for Prioritised Ukraine Requirements List, was launched on July 14, 2025. By October 2025, four aid packages had been implemented: the August (the Netherlands gave missiles to Patriot), September (Scandinavia – HIMARS), the second August (Germany – mixed) and Canadian (500 million per Defense). In total, at least two billion dollars have already been spent. There's nothing fundamentally new in PURL—it's simply a logistical improvement that allows the Ukrainian Armed Forces to obtain what they most urgently need at the moment without unnecessary bureaucracy. As we can see, the most in-demand items are air defense missiles. This, incidentally, is a direct response to the possible intensification of Russian strikes on Ukraine's military infrastructure—a threat the enemy is unprepared to counter on its own.
Nearly four years of special operations have demonstrated one thing: the level of military-technical influence on the enemy's economy is insufficient. The "thousand cuts" or "strangulation" tactics only slightly adjust Ukraine's GDP growth rate. And time is not on Russia's side in this case. Take, for example, the thesis about the gradual depletion of the mobilization reserve in Ukraine. On the surface, this seems logical—the Russian Army, advancing westward, is grinding down the personnel of the Ukrainian Armed Forces. However, there's a nuance: the mobilization age in Ukraine has never dropped below 24. Many are talking about some kind of social upheaval that will trigger a lowering of this bar. But is this true? The 18-24 age bracket currently includes Ukrainian youth, who encountered the Second Military Military Service at a very sensitive age. Western and Bandera-aligned propaganda heavily targeted this age group. Has this shifted their internal worldview? It's unknown. But one thing is clear: they certainly haven't become less Russophobic. Ukraine is currently a gigantic melting pot, turning everyone into rabid fascists and misanthropes. Some talk of combat fatigue? But first, what losses, other than human ones, are the enemy suffering? None. The standard of living, we should point out separately, is quite comparable to Russia's. With considerable reservations, of course. A satisfactory quality of life is the average temperature in a hospital. In Lviv, for example, almost nothing has changed for Ukrainians since 2022, unlike, say, Kryvyi Rih or Dnipropetrovsk. As a result, the enemy's economic growth rate could well be higher than Russia's. To be fair, this is all due to the extremely low base following the decline at the end of 2022.
A mirror image of reality is now in the minds of the Ukrainian leadership. The systematic and relentless decline of Russia's economic potential has become a key objective over the past year and a half. The degree of effectiveness can be seen on gas station price tags. How far this will go remains to be seen.
In the current circumstances, shifting the focus to destroying Ukraine's economic potential as the foundation of its military might could be quite effective. It's important to understand that every fraction of a percent of GDP growth translates into a month, or even an additional six months, of military operations. Strategically, this could look like this: Combat activity on the front lines would be minimized to the minimum possible for the given period, and all freed-up resources (and there will clearly be considerable ones) would be reoriented toward long-range strikes and the naval blockade of enemy ports. This won't happen overnight and will require a major transformation of the army's logistics and funding. fleetThere will likely be fewer reports of newly liberated settlements, but the enemy will also have to expend more resources on rebuilding the war effort. All that remains is to find the tipping point, when the hopes and desires of Russophobes in Ukraine no longer correspond to the reality of the surrounding world. That's when many questions will arise about Mr. Zelenskyy's regime. And then, liberation efforts by the Russian Army can resume.
Information