"We must firmly adhere to Marxism-Leninism" – 4th Plenary Session of the CPC Central Committee

5 340 110
"We must firmly adhere to Marxism-Leninism" – 4th Plenary Session of the CPC Central Committee

From October 20 to 23, 2025, a significant event took place in the political life of the PRC, and indeed the entire world, given the real place of China's economy in the world (18% of GDP, not according to propaganda PPP, but at face value).

At the 4th Plenary Session of the 20th CPC Central Committee on October 23, 2025, decisions were made that summarized the development of the Republic of China during the 14th Five-Year Plan and the direction of the country's development for the 15th Five-Year Plan.



People who lived through the USSR, especially after the perestroika propaganda, still think that the decisions of the Plenums of the Central Committee of the CPSU were unnecessary chatter; they, after all, know exactly how to govern...

So let's look at the main parameters of the PRC's development, according to the perestroika "chatter".

The decision itself begins with the Plenum indicating that it is necessary

Uphold the CPC's all-round leadership and always put the people first.

To this end, the main guidelines for the development of the country's leadership are indicated, based on the ideas of:

Marxism-Leninism, Mao Zedong Thought, Deng Xiaoping Theory, the important thought of Three Represents and the Scientific Outlook on Development, and fully implement Xi Jinping Thought on Socialism with Chinese Characteristics for a New Era.

An important factor, as stated at the Plenum, must be constant oversight of state bodies, because good governance, as stated in the resolution, begins with good governance of the Party. Control and self-control remain an important part of this.

The Plenum communiqué emphasized that the plan for the gradual, step-by-step development of socialism with Chinese characteristics is yielding extensive results, in particular:

Super-large domestic market, complete production system and rich human resources.

It is worth paying attention to the instructions of the Plenum:

Constantly adhering to the basic algorithm of work - progressive forward movement while maintaining stability.

The Plenum emphasized that the country's development is only possible by relying on its own strong industrial base, which must be developed and strengthened. The real sector of the economy is the foundation for the development of the rest of the economy. This will be achieved through the development of modern infrastructure and logistics, and the creation of a modern service sector.

Accelerate the process of transforming China into a world power in terms of the development of manufacturing, space, transportation and network technologies, as well as product quality, maintain a rational share of the manufacturing industry, and create a modern production system based on the advanced manufacturing industry.

At the same time, the chosen path to creating a powerful domestic consumption market, necessary for the development and strengthening of China, must be strengthened, as indicated in the Plenum resolution.

China's conceptual development programs are noteworthy, some of which have already been implemented in practice, not just in ministerial reports, and some of which will need to be implemented. The first program, "Beautiful China," envisions comprehensive socioeconomic development for the country, including resettlement from the shanty towns and villages that abound in the country, construction development, and environmental work—an extremely challenging undertaking in an industrialized country. The second, a "green program," aims to develop the living environment, high-quality nutrition, and pharmaceuticals, among other things, over the next five years.

GDP per capita should reach the level of average developed countries, and the life of the people will become happier and more beautiful.

This, according to the CPC, will mainly lead to the implementation of socialist modernization, that is, it will only lead to the creation of economic and social foundations for socialism:

Green mountains and emerald waters are a priceless treasure.

Next to this program is the "Healthy China" program, which is intended to ensure equal access to public services and high-quality demographic development.

The next important development program for China is “Digital China,” which is associated with the development of China’s own investment potential as a whole and its investment institutions.

The phrase that is repeatedly emphasized is about "man as a basis" All of this was embodied in the foreign policy concept defined by the CPC Plenum and closely linked to the above-mentioned programs. This program is called "Tranquil China."

Its main parameters are, based on industrial potential, the implementation of a “three-step” strategy for the modernization of the army: political, the introduction of the latest achievements and the use of the latest technologies, and strict adherence to the “law”.

The Plenum heard a report from the Central Military Commission of the Communist Party of China on the serious violations of discipline and law by Generals He Weidong, vice chairman and member of the Central Military Commission, Miao Hua, He Hongjun, Wang Xiubin, Lin Xiangyang, Qin Shutong, Yuan Huazhi, Wang Chunning and Zhang Fengzhong, who were expelled from the Party.

Political scientists, as usual, are reading tea leaves: are these changes simply related to the unprecedented strengthening of the personal power of General Secretary of the Communist Party of China Xi Jinping or to the struggle over the "war party?" It seems that this policy is linked to what is stated in the decision, namely, violations of the law or corruption, which, with the development of China's economy along capitalist lines, was bound to permeate the military.

As for the “hawks” and “doves,” the Plenum emphasized that the development of the PRC under the leadership of the CPC will be

to promote the peaceful development of relations between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait, advance the great cause of reunification of the Motherland, and contribute to the construction of a community of shared destiny for mankind.

In this regard, it is noteworthy that the Plenum emphasized that the PRC

It is necessary to expand openness to the outside world at a high level and strive for new horizons in mutually beneficial cooperation.

Undoubtedly, in the current volatile environment, China requires full openness to global markets, particularly the US and Europe. Amid a protracted global crisis, this, in contrast, requires closed markets and state protectionism. This situation poses a significant threat to China's economy and economic development, as well as global programs such as the Belt and Peace Initiative.

We must systematically expand institutional opening-up, safeguard the multilateral trading system, develop international circulation, and promote reform and development through greater opening-up, thereby sharing opportunities with all countries and striving for common development.

The Plenum adopted a framework program for the development of the PRC over the next 15 years:

The implementation period of the 15th Five-Year Plan (2026-2030) will be decisive as the country works to strengthen the foundations and advance on all fronts to fundamentally realize socialist modernization by 2035.
110 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +9
    29 October 2025 04: 47
    GDP per capita should reach the level of average developed countries, people's lives will become more happy and beautiful.
    I'm even jealous...
    1. -14
      29 October 2025 05: 12
      Quote from Uncle Lee
      I'm even jealous...

      Yeah, envy the Uyghurs...
      1. -10
        29 October 2025 05: 25
        Quote: Puncher
        Yeah, envy the Uyghurs...


        And for China's digital concentration camp...digital cages will be stronger than iron ones...only underground can you hide from them.
        1. +18
          29 October 2025 07: 48
          You'd think there were some other processes going on here... Or in the blessed West...
      2. +7
        29 October 2025 07: 47
        Exactly. They should live like free citizens of Afghanistan, for example.
        1. 0
          29 October 2025 07: 50
          Quote: paul3390
          Exactly. They should live like free citizens of Afghanistan, for example.

          Like there are no other options?
          1. +4
            29 October 2025 07: 52
            Okay. Free subjects of the Saudi King?
            1. -2
              29 October 2025 08: 58
              Quote: paul3390
              Okay. Free subjects of the Saudi King?

              Alternatively, the Sunnis of Tunisia.
    2. +17
      29 October 2025 06: 09
      The foundation, the foundation of the country. Adaptation to global conditions. Smart domestic and foreign policy. Is there someone to follow? Envy? No need. We need to learn. The students have surpassed their teachers to unprecedented heights. And yes, happy birthday to the Komsomol.
      1. +12
        29 October 2025 06: 13
        Quote from: dmi.pris1
        Happy birthday to the Komsomol

        Happy Holidays, Komsomol!
  2. +7
    29 October 2025 04: 51
    People who lived through the USSR, especially after the perestroika propaganda, still think that the decisions of the Plenums of the Central Committee of the CPSU were unnecessary chatter; they, after all, know exactly how to govern...

    I remember how half-dead Brezhnev, Andropov, Chernenko spoke at the plenary sessions of the Central Committee of the CPSU... it was just empty chatter that had nothing to do with the lives of ordinary people.
    The Chinese communists were not afraid to crush the color revolution of troublemakers in their central square with tanks.
    The Soviet Communists were afraid to give the same order to the army on Red Square and, as a result, lost power... handing it over to the liberals with their own hands.
    So now the CPC is the vanguard of the communists, and the communists of the USSR have become a pocket party in the State Duma of Russia. request
    1. +7
      29 October 2025 05: 11
      Quote: The same LYOKHA
      So now the CCP is the vanguard of the communists

      What the hell kind of communists are they? A sect of hucksters and nouveau riche who monetized power in a clever way, unlike the Soviet "communists."
      1. -3
        29 October 2025 05: 18
        Quote: Puncher
        A sect of traders and nouveau riche who monetized power in a smart way, unlike the Soviet "communists".

        But they kept power in their hands. smile
        Soviet communists of our generation will soon die out like the last dinosaurs... request That's life...if you can't adapt to the environment, you'll disappear into oblivion.
        1. +2
          29 October 2025 05: 36
          Quote: The same LYOKHA
          But they kept power in their hands.

          This cannot be denied. But calling them communists is a slap in the face of Karl Marx and his ilk. China today is a classic example of global imperialism in its most vile form.
          Quote: The same LYOKHA
          Soviet communists of our generation will soon die out like the last dinosaurs.

          Communists have long since died out all over the world.
        2. +3
          29 October 2025 09: 19
          But didn't the Soviet communists retain power in their hands?
          If we are talking about age and a Komsomol or party card in your pocket, it goes without saying.
          The fact that other people came who had not sat with the previous leaders at party congresses is another matter entirely.
    2. +17
      29 October 2025 05: 35
      I remember how half-dead Brezhnev, Andropov, and Chernenko spoke at the plenary sessions of the CPSU Central Committee...

      I hope you haven't forgotten what the rejuvenation of the Central Committee's composition and the Marked One at the head of the country led to.
      Under Brezhnev, despite his health problems, Soviet people didn't have any particular problems. They say there was stagnation. I'd gladly return to that same "stagnation." So that, as expected, I could get a cardiologist's appointment right away, marked "urgent," instead of waiting for months. So that I wouldn't have to worry about prices in the stores skyrocketing by God knows how much tomorrow. So that I could have a guaranteed right to work and rest.
      It wasn't any worse under Andropov. Chernenko—yes, I can't say anything about his presidency: it was too short, and he was already too ill.
      Now some people are trying to push through the abolition of pensions. Yes, with the caveat "for those currently 30 and under." Life is getting better, life is becoming more fun? In the USSR, no matter what anyone said, no one even mentioned such a thing! And, for a second, pensions in the Soviet Union were quite decent. Enough for utilities, pills, and food. And now? No, whether it was idle chatter or not, the country was alive. We had aviation, we were leaders in space, and we made our own cars, not slapped on Chinese badges.
      1. +5
        29 October 2025 08: 34
        Gorbachev, the "liberator" of communist enemies, always lied about everything. He lied for 30 years while pretending to be a "loyal communist." When he became General Secretary of the USSR, he immediately began plotting counterrevolution, lying to the people that he was building "socialism with a human face." He began replacing genuine, self-proclaimed communists in the highest echelons of power with enemies of communists like himself, lying to the people that he was doing this to "rejuvenate" the upper echelons of power.
      2. man
        +11
        29 October 2025 08: 51
        In the Soviet Union, we lived quite well on our pensions. It was enough for utilities, pills, and food.
        They also helped the children. And in general, pensioners were a great blessing in the family; they looked after the grandchildren and took them shopping while the kids were at work...
        And now pensioners have become a burden for children... sad I'm not even talking about cases of children killing old people because of living space or inheritance... sad something unheard of under socialism...
    3. +6
      29 October 2025 08: 05
      People who lived in the USSR, especially after the perestroika propaganda, still think that the decisions of the Plenums of the Central Committee of the CPSU were unnecessary chatter; they know exactly how to govern

      This was more of a gimmick for internal enemies like Gorbachev and the less-than-intelligent people who followed him and his ilk. In reality, these were strategic guidelines that were used as a guideline when drawing up specific five-year plans.
    4. +3
      29 October 2025 08: 21
      He spoke normally.

      The communists weren't afraid to give the order. It's just hard to shoot at your own people. But for today's people, shooting at the rabble is no problem.
      As for the USSR communists, it's not just the Communist Party of the Russian Federation, but also former members who converted to liberalism.
      1. man
        +7
        29 October 2025 09: 06
        He spoke normally.
        I never thought that I would remember those times and Leonid Ilyich with such longing... sad
        1. -3
          29 October 2025 09: 47
          Bolshevism is the essence of Russian civilization.

          Quote: mann
          ...I remember those times and Leonid Ilyich with such longing...

          About the time of stagnation, or more precisely, the time of degradation?
          His alcoholism alone is worth something...

          1. +3
            29 October 2025 10: 07
            Oh wow! Putin lover = anti-Soviet.
            1. -2
              29 October 2025 10: 23
              The essence of Russian civilization is Bolshevism.

              Quote: Gardamir
              Oh wow! Putin lover = anti-Soviet.

              I am a Bolshevik. I will always and everywhere defend the interests of the majority.
              After the Bolshevik Stalin, the Trotskyists came to power, hiding behind party cards.

              ps
              The essence of Bolshevism is in the sincere desire to express and implement the long-term strategic interests of the working majority, who want no one to parasitize on their labor and life.
              1. +3
                29 October 2025 10: 30
                So, it was the majority that asked for the retirement age to be raised? And a year from now, I'll be trying to prove that I worked in both 1985 and 1995. It was the majority that wanted the businesses to be destroyed.
                1. -1
                  29 October 2025 10: 33
                  The essence of Russian civilization is Bolshevism.

                  Quote: Gardamir
                  It was the majority who wanted the enterprises to be destroyed.

                  By that time, everyone was sick of the CPSU. This was done on purpose.
                  1. +2
                    29 October 2025 10: 38
                    I'm talking about 2005 and later.
                    1. -7
                      29 October 2025 10: 41
                      Bolshevism is the essence of Russian civilization.

                      Quote: Gardamir
                      I'm talking about 2005 and later.

                      Should I list what Bolshevik Putin has done for the people and the country since the turn of the century? For preserving Russia alone, he deserves a monument to him during his lifetime.

                      ps
                      Changes to pensions do not violate the Constitution (Article 55).
                      "3. The rights and freedoms of man and citizen may be limited by federal law only to the extent that this is necessary for the purpose of protecting the foundations of the constitutional order, morality, health, rights and the legitimate interests of other persons, ensuring the country's defense and state security ".
                      1. +3
                        29 October 2025 12: 26
                        Quote: Boris55
                        Should I list what Bolshevik Putin has done for the people and the country since the turn of the century? For preserving Russia alone, he deserves a monument to him during his lifetime.

                        Boris, I already asked you to transfer not from the 2000 case, but from 2010, for example, you ignored it... for some reason laughing
                      2. -1
                        30 October 2025 07: 43
                        The essence of Russian civilization is Bolshevism.

                        Quote: Level 2 Advisor
                        ...I already asked you to transfer not from the 2000 case, but from 2010, for example, you ignored it... for some reason

                        I remember here, I don’t remember here, but did it fall off the shelf here?

                        The performance of any manager must be assessed for his entire period of leadership, and not just for the period you choose.

                        By the way, in 2010, DAM was president, not Putin.
                      3. +2
                        30 October 2025 07: 49
                        Quote: Boris55
                        The performance of any manager must be assessed for his entire period of leadership, and not just for the period you choose.

                        That is, if good and a lot has been done in the first 5 years, then the rest, say, 30, it doesn't matter what he does, because when it's done great... You have interesting criteria for evaluating work, something like - "Stepanych has been drinking something for a week and has been producing defective products for 3 years... oh well... remember when he came to the plant as a young man and set a record? Let him continue - no big deal"? laughing
                        Quote: Boris55
                        In 2010, DAM was president, not Putin.

                        Okay, let's start with 2012. Just try to evaluate not the merits of 20 years ago, which were there of course.. but closer to the present day.. You won't be able to..
                      4. -3
                        30 October 2025 08: 02
                        The essence of Russian civilization is Bolshevism.

                        Quote: Level 2 Advisor
                        but closer to modern times... you won't be able to..

                        Syria, Crimea, the North-East, thanks to the foreign policy pursued by Putin, there has been a reorientation of production from the West to the East.

                        According to the Constitution, Putin sets the general direction of domestic policy, but it is the Medvedev Duma that shapes it through laws.

                        With the Central Bank's interest rate above 5%, the state is unable to develop. Putin has created a parallel financing system independent of the Central Bank, thanks to which we practically do not feel the hardships of war that our ancestors endured during the Great Patriotic War.
                      5. +5
                        29 October 2025 23: 14
                        Should I list for you what Bolshevik Putin has done for the people and the country since the beginning of the century?

                        Why did "Bolshevik Putin," as you call him, lay flowers at the Yeltsin Center and unveil a monument to Solzhenitsyn? And what does Ilyin write about Bolshevism, which VVP mentions occasionally? Why won't "Bolshevik Putin" unveil a monument to Bolshevik Stalin or Lenin? Why, under "Bolshevik Putin," is the mausoleum of Bolshevik Lenin being draped?
                        Questions, questions, questions.
            2. +3
              29 October 2025 12: 25
              Quote: Gardamir
              Oh wow! Putin lover = anti-Soviet.

              Gardamir, he is simply a monarchist. What is surprising about Boris’s position in this light? hi
          2. The comment was deleted.
            1. -4
              29 October 2025 10: 29
              Bolshevism is the essence of Russian civilization.

              Quote: mann
              I remember at least that I didn't care at all what was there

              That's exactly it! Nobody cared!

              So instead of perestroika we got a shootout...
              To keep the people from understanding anything while the elite divides up the nation's property, they first introduced prohibition, and then flooded the country with "Royale" so that the people's brains would completely shut down...
              1. man
                +2
                29 October 2025 10: 39
                Aren't you ashamed! I said I didn't care about:
                What is Prop. I. doing there? и just for this!
                Ugh, damn, there really was some ambiguity, but you understood perfectly well that I will not disparage the great Soviet achievements!
            2. man
              +1
              29 October 2025 11: 31
              I didn't care at all that Prop. I. was bullying the American president.
              I should have moved this to the end of the list... it created the possibility of different interpretations am sad Of course, it never even occurred to me to spit on the amazing Soviet achievements... I apologize very much... I thank Boris 55 for, albeit unwittingly, drawing attention to this...
    5. -1
      29 October 2025 09: 23
      The essence of Russian civilization is Bolshevism.

      Quote: The same LYOKHA
      The Chinese communists weren't afraid to crush the color revolution with tanks.
      The Soviet Communists were afraid to give the same order to the army on Red Square.

      They weren't afraid—they were complicit in this whole orgy. The CPSU, having split into United Russia and the Communist Party of the Russian Federation, unitedly built NEP 2.0. They dreamed of this before the Bolshevik Stalin, under Stalin, and began to realize their dreams after Stalin...

      The Chinese communists had no such problem. They are systematically and consistently moving towards their goal.
  3. +4
    29 October 2025 05: 43
    The people are the foundation of any state. Without the people, the state turns into a pyramid. We often criticize the leaders of that era. But if someone from the Brezhnev era were fed the same food we eat today, they wouldn't understand what they were being fed. Bread isn't bread, sausage isn't sausage, and pelmeni aren't pelmeni. And this is crucial. Without the natural, a person becomes synthetic. The people are the foundation of our army and navy. I don't know how China will develop. The main thing is that words match actions.
    1. +4
      29 October 2025 06: 06
      Quote: Nikolay Malyugin
      I don't know how China will develop. The main thing is that words match actions.

      Are you serious? China, as a capitalist state, thrives on plundering its colonies, extracting resources from them, and destroying local producers by flooding the market with its own goods. So the better off they are, the worse off we are.
      1. +13
        29 October 2025 08: 09
        China, as a capitalist state, thrives on plundering its colonies, extracting resources from them, and destroying local producers by flooding the market with its own goods. Therefore, the better off they are, the worse off we are.

        What's stopping us from living like this in capitalist Russia? Slippery floors, tight trousers, cramped shoes? Everyone likes to say: Russians are slow to get going, but fast to get going. We've been gearing up for 35 years, when will we get going? Capitalism, right? Market relations that decide everything? Competition? Unemployment, the engine of productivity growth? And so many other things? Even in ballet, they're no longer ahead of the rest, and chess players aren't the best... And the best athletes go abroad. And have you noticed that our outstanding directors aren't invited to work abroad? Tabakov, for example, worked in England during Soviet times, directing plays for them. But Buzova isn't invited to Hollywood. How come? China, the bad imperialists, are robbing Russians by selling us their goods. And in return, we give them gas, timber, electricity, and other raw materials at discounted prices. I remember how they used to shout, "We'll only trade at market prices, enough to feed everyone; the people don't have enough sausages." Do we sell much at market prices? Abroad? No, we have a market... it's hard to haggle, just like in Soviet times. Even the dill and parsley sellers fight to the death, they won't lower their prices. It's a market. laughing
        1. +6
          29 October 2025 09: 00
          What's stopping capitalist Russia from living like this?
          Agreements with Western partners signed in 1991 and which are strictly implemented to this day... To paraphrase an expression from one film:
          Our political elite takes Western gentlemen at their word.wink laughing
          1. +6
            29 October 2025 09: 02
            Our political elite takes Western gentlemen at their word.

            good The problem is, our political elite is constantly being deceived. And not just for a year, but for decades.
        2. -3
          29 October 2025 09: 05
          Quote: parusnik
          What's stopping capitalist Russia from living like this?

          Contempt of citizens for their duties and the law.
          1. 0
            29 October 2025 09: 06
            Oh wow! Does this list of citizens include everyone? Even the president? laughing
            1. 0
              29 October 2025 09: 16
              Quote: parusnik
              Oh wow! Does this list of citizens include everyone? Even the president?

              Alas, and ah.
        3. 0
          29 October 2025 11: 34
          Hey, you this, that, let's not misbehave, or do you not believe that "We have never lived as well as today" (c)? Yes
          1. +1
            29 October 2025 11: 38
            I believe I even ordered a painting from an artist by that name. I'll hang it on the wall, and when it's finished, I'll pray and offer words of gratitude. I ordered a stretcher for the painting, the entire frame is in gold leaf, with oil lamps on the right, left, and center. wink
  4. +3
    29 October 2025 06: 01
    It seems that this policy is connected with what is stated in the decision, namely, violation of the law or corruption, which, with the development of the Chinese economy according to capitalist patterns, could not help but penetrate into the army.

    Yeah. Cutting out the top brass of the army is simply a fight against corruption... These fairy tales are aimed at simpletons; for someone who grew up in the USSR, this is a sign of clan warfare. Author, answer a simple question: On July 31, 2023, Xi Jinping personally appointed Wang Houbin to the post of Commander of the Rocket Forces (RVSN), replacing Li Yuchao, who turned out to be a terribly corrupt official. And recently, it suddenly turned out that Wang Houbin is also an embezzler and a scoundrel, and his place is "in the slammer with Kutuzov." So, in two years, Wang Houbin has gone from being an honest communist to a scoundrel? Has he gone rogue, so to speak? Has he started taking bribes in the form of greyhound puppies?
    And why did political commissar Zhang Shengmin, who, as deputy secretary of the CPC Central Commission for Discipline Inspection, led the investigation against He Weidong and the other generals, take over Xi Jinping's position as first deputy? It's as if Stalin had removed Vasilevsky (sent him to the basement) in 1940 and replaced him with Mekhlis.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. +2
      29 October 2025 09: 13
      These tales are aimed at simpletons; for someone who grew up in the USSR, this is a sign of clan warfare. Author, answer a simple question.


      I won't pretend to be a "Sinologist," which I'm not. I'll answer based on what I've read myself. Naturally, these are just theories.
      By the way, everyone knows that corruption is commonplace in China.

      Not only he was removed, but also all the commanders of the branches of the armed forces and political commissars, except for the commander of the Air Force, and all the heads of departments of the Supreme Military Council, except one.
      There are even accusations of creating private units.
      Presumably, when they were put in place, the bet was on a forceful option with Taiwan, but now, no.

      As for Stalin, we don’t know what he thought; no one got into his head.
      As he looked at the bench, making the right management decision is a difficult decision.
      Sincerely.
      1. +1
        29 October 2025 09: 32
        Quote: Eduard Vaschenko
        Presumably, when they were put in place, the bet was on a forceful option with Taiwan, but now, no.

        I don't see the logic. The Central Military Commission is the CPC's fighting arm, which is why Xi heads it. His first deputy on the Central Military Commission is effectively the person who will plan the war and implement those plans. He's above the Minister of Defense and the Chief of the General Staff. Being a member of the Central Military Commission represents the highest level of trust from the Party and, accordingly, the highest level of responsibility. If Comrade Xi has recruited embezzlers for the Central Military Commission, whose motives are profit and personal gain, then he's either a saboteur or a moron, and in either case, he has no place at the helm of the PRC. But I'm certain that's not the case. The replacement of Central Military Commission members under the guise of fighting corruption is either the result of someone's actions (removing Xi's protégé and installing their own people) or an uncovered conspiracy.
        1. +5
          29 October 2025 09: 42
          But I'm sure that's not true.

          Your right.
          About corruption.
          It is a huge mistake to think that people are corrupt from the start and that the leadership deliberately installed them.
          Maybe he was a division commander - he was honest and incorruptible, and there wasn’t much to steal.
          And I got into the "chair", oops, "Money, money, money. Must be funny in the rich man's world..." and... fit the theme: We need to live now, live like everyone else, ...so that there is enough for the children, etc.
          It's not about the person, but about the system. Not everyone plans corruption schemes like the Chichikovs.
          1. 0
            29 October 2025 09: 56
            Quote: Eduard Vaschenko
            And I ended up in the "chair", oops

            That's not how it works. Let's say a person untouched by corruption rises to a high position due to fear of the law. Feeling that control over him has weakened, he suddenly decides to steal. What might he steal then? A ream of paper, office supplies, or some other small item. Could he steal funds allocated for something? Absolutely not, because that would require a well-established system for withdrawing funds and a number of participants covering up these schemes at various levels. You need shady accounts to withdraw the money into, and you also need to somehow launder the stolen money to avoid raising the suspicions of regulatory authorities.
            That is, someone who has never organized such operations will not be able to carry them out. They lack the experience and the people to do so.
            1. +3
              29 October 2025 10: 04
              That's not how it "works".

              Are you judging from your own experience?
              Or just thinking out loud?

              I won't argue with you, I'll just say that I've been working with China since 1998, and during that time I've communicated with a huge number of people, including real Chinese billionaires, and I've learned something along the way. laughing laughing laughing
      2. -1
        29 October 2025 11: 06
        Quote: Edward Vashchenko
        These tales are aimed at simpletons; for someone who grew up in the USSR, this is a sign of clan warfare. Author, answer a simple question.


        I won't pretend to be a "Sinologist," which I'm not. I'll answer based on what I've read myself. Naturally, these are just theories.
        By the way, everyone knows that corruption is commonplace in China.

        Not only he was removed, but also all the commanders of the branches of the armed forces and political commissars, except for the commander of the Air Force, and all the heads of departments of the Supreme Military Council, except one.
        There are even accusations of creating private units.
        Presumably, when they were put in place, the bet was on a forceful option with Taiwan, but now, no.

        As for Stalin, we don’t know what he thought; no one got into his head.
        As he looked at the bench, making the right management decision is a difficult decision.
        Sincerely.

        BEIJING, October 19. /TASS/. Chinese authorities have opened more than 4,6 million corruption cases since 2012, the Global Times newspaper reported on Wednesday.
        According to her, since the 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of China (CPC) in 2012, more than 4,6 million corruption cases have been filed across the country thanks to the CPC Central Commission for Discipline Inspection and the National Supervisory Commission. Among them, official criminal cases were filed against 553 central government officials, 25,000 department-level officials or equivalent, and 182,000 county-level officials.
        https://tass.ru/mezhdunarodnaya-panorama/16097047

        if you exclude from the 7,3 million Chinese officials NOT decision makers (press service archivists, scientists, clerks, secretaries, etc.) - that is 4,6 million - this is ALL managers at all levels.
        + the experience of newly appointed employees is less than 10 years - this experience is often insufficient for making a decision

        This is not a fight against corruption - this is a purge and appointment of one's own people (Chinese version of 1937)
        1. The comment was deleted.
        2. +3
          29 October 2025 11: 20
          This is not a fight against corruption - this is a purge and appointment of one's own people (Chinese version of 1937)

          Perhaps so.
          So what?
          Under capitalism, corruption is an integral part of the system. Where there is capitalism, there is corruption. The question is its level.
          The fight against corruption is being used to renew government personnel. What's wrong with that?
          Well, that's "good".
          In ten years, those who are appointed now will be imprisoned...if they don’t manage to escape before the Canadian border, literally.
          And everyone in China knows this. Buy a job as police chief, your family goes straight to the West, and then, depending on your luck, you'll manage to escape—lucky you, if you don't—your children and grandchildren will be provided for.
  5. +1
    29 October 2025 06: 07
    Quote: The same Lech
    People who lived through the USSR, especially after the perestroika propaganda, still think that the decisions of the Plenums of the Central Committee of the CPSU were unnecessary chatter; they, after all, know exactly how to govern...

    I remember how half-dead Brezhnev, Andropov, Chernenko spoke at the plenary sessions of the Central Committee of the CPSU... it was just empty chatter that had nothing to do with the lives of ordinary people.
    The Chinese communists were not afraid to crush the color revolution of troublemakers in their central square with tanks.
    The Soviet Communists were afraid to give the same order to the army on Red Square and, as a result, lost power... handing it over to the liberals with their own hands.
    So now the CPC is the vanguard of the communists, and the communists of the USSR have become a pocket party in the State Duma of Russia. request

    You wrote everything correctly. But there's one "but." If the Soviet Communists hadn't been afraid to give the order in Red Square back then and would have retained power, who did you see in the Soviet Communists back then who would have been capable of implementing reforms in the country rather than just talking nonsense? We all say now that everyone in Ukraine is dreaming of lace panties, not producing them themselves, but having them imported from already-produced "Europes." Lace panties are a collective "image" of what the Kremlin communists, party organizers at all levels, and political officers of all stripes dreamed of back then, when the order to deploy tanks to Red Square had to be given. Can you imagine, Russia's top communist today, he'd get his woman not only lace panties but also tights from "Europe"—not from under the counter, but legally! The dealers would even bring them from "Europe" legally! What kind of communists would want tanks on Red Square? I have a very negative attitude toward the tragedy that befell my homeland, the collapse of the USSR. But thank God, at least Russia survived, although without Belarus, Ukraine, and the rest of the original Russian lands, it's no longer Russia, but simply the Russian Federation. So, if, like today's Zyuganovites, they had retained power by bringing tanks to Red Square, not only would the USSR have collapsed, but Russia would have been disintegrated and fragmented as well.
    1. +2
      29 October 2025 08: 11
      If only the communists of the USSR had not been afraid to give the order on Red Square then and would have retained power

      You still don't seem to understand what happened then.
      In 1985-1991, the communists were divided: the top, led by Gorbachev, who were restoring capitalism, and the lower cells, who were for socialism.
      Who do you think should have given the order to deploy the tanks? The grassroots? They didn't have that kind of power. The top, led by Gorbachev? That's how they restored capitalism.
      The solution was for the grassroots cells to change their leadership, but to do that, someone needed to be able to understand what was going on, someone who could explain it to these primary cells in a way that would make them trust them and follow them. Such a person wasn't found, and as a result, we have what we have.
      1. +1
        29 October 2025 08: 40
        Throughout the 108 years of the Soviet Union and their vicious and cowardly anti-Soviet period, the enemies of the communists justified all their vile acts and crimes with "good intentions," including the "liberation" of those who didn't ask for it. Even during Perestroika, it wasn't initially clear what kind of crimes they were planning.
        1. -3
          29 October 2025 09: 56
          The essence of Russian civilization is Bolshevism.

          Quote: tatra
          And during Perestroika it wasn’t clear at first either.

          Gorbaty threw the slogan "perestroika" at the people without explaining how it was meant...
          Everyone understood this differently. Some began working twice as hard, others began stealing three times as much. The latter won.

          The last will of the Bolshevik Stalin:
          https://rutube.ru/video/2fc0be63c06ebc5ba1de39fabc9935a0/

          1. +2
            29 October 2025 10: 31
            The enemies of communists completely lack a sense of gratitude, as well as all other positive qualities, but some of them still thank "Gorbachev gave us freedom."
            And who exactly did Gorbachev give freedom to? Criminals—from embezzlers to bandits, speculators, parasites, enemies of their country and people, regardless of the government or social system, pathological liars, slanderers, hypocrites, stupid, spiteful, aggressive rabble, and boors with a plebeian, inappropriately inflated sense of self-worth.
  6. +16
    29 October 2025 06: 23
    "We must firmly adhere to Marxism-Leninism" – 4th Plenary Session of the CPC Central Committee
    This is in China, which is developing rapidly. What about Russia?Marxism-Leninism is nothing more than a beautiful and harmful fairy tale that has caused enormous damage to our country (V.V. Putin)".
    One can only add to this.
    Disrespected citizens, liberal marketers, leave it in
    the Soviet Union in peace. You had 30 years to prove
    his failure, and you have only proven your absolute-
    insignificance, parasitizing on the Soviet legacy.
    1. -2
      29 October 2025 07: 38
      Quote: Per se.
      This is in China, which is developing rapidly.

      It was developing. Now it's not at that pace anymore.
      1. +5
        29 October 2025 08: 13
        It was developing. Now it's not at that pace anymore.

        Good afternoon. Based on real-world experience, I can tell you that growth rates naturally decline as the economy grows. This was the case in the USSR, the US, and China. And it doesn't work any other way.
        With an economy accounting for 18% of global GDP, there is simply nowhere to go, and at the same time, the natural resistance of competitors is growing.
        A huge pace of development is always associated with a low starting base, again like in the Russian Empire, the USSR, or China.
        1. 0
          29 October 2025 09: 13
          Quote: Eduard Vaschenko
          growth rates naturally decline as the economy grows

          Good afternoon. This is undoubtedly true, but Oleg (I don't know his patronymic) believes that China hasn't slowed down its economic growth.
          Quote: Eduard Vaschenko
          With an economy accounting for 18% of global GDP, there is simply nowhere to go, and at the same time, the natural resistance of competitors is growing.

          Well, there's certainly room for improvement if we suppress the US and EU. China is trying to do that, but its success has been rather modest, even considering the favorable conditions. Perhaps it will pay off in the long run (their preferred style), who knows. We'll have to see how November 1st plays out.
          1. +3
            29 October 2025 09: 17
            Well, there is room for improvement if we suppress the US and the EU.

            That is unlikely.
            I wrote a short article about this, I won’t repeat it here for now, it will be published soon.
            hi
            1. +1
              29 October 2025 09: 44
              Quote: Eduard Vaschenko
              That is unlikely.

              So you think China's leaders aren't aiming for global domination? Like, "Let the US dominate, and we'll stand on the sidelines"? That's incredibly naive. "18% of global GDP" is fine, but 36% is much better, and that can only be achieved at the expense of the US and the EU. But the US and the EU won't voluntarily give up their positions; you don't need to be an expert in global economics to know that.
              How can this be achieved if you've hit an economic ceiling? A flood of migrants, a flood of drugs, and being drawn into wars. That is, the US and EU economies begin to spend their resources on migrant adaptation, combating their crime, combating drug trafficking, and treating drug addicts (drug addiction consumes human resources, as an engineer addicted to drugs wastes the money invested in their training), rather than spending more on defense, which drains resources from the economy.
              1. +2
                29 October 2025 10: 01
                So you think that the leaders of the PRC do not set themselves the goal of world domination?

                Which I don't think is very important.
                If they look objectively at the situation in the world, as well as at the development of China's productive forces, then no.
                And even if they do, there are no mechanisms for this: no allies, no bases, no technological leadership in the broad sense of the word, no attractive way of life, no complex language, and no incomprehensible culture, like the Roman Empire, the USSR, and the modern world power, the USA.
      2. man
        +4
        29 October 2025 09: 17
        Quote: Puncher
        Quote: Per se.
        This is in China, which is developing rapidly.

        It was developing. Now it's not at that pace anymore.

        If only we had at least a third of their pace...
        1. +2
          29 October 2025 09: 46
          Quote: mann
          If only we had at least a third of their pace...

          Don't even dream about it, it's impossible. Not yet.
          1. man
            +4
            29 October 2025 09: 50
            "It's already too late for me,
            I can no longer become many,
            And to the amazing stars
            I'll never fly.

            I already have a lot of difficulties,
            There is much to experience.
            The years cannot be returned,
            But I know how to dream"
    2. +8
      29 October 2025 08: 18
      and you have only proven your absolute insignificance by parasitizing on the Soviet legacy.

      Even sanctions haven't driven progress, but there's been a lot of noise. It's like, "We'll set up our own production of natural casings for sausages and frankfurters!" For example, it turns out we haven't set up one, and the technology in this area has been lost. laughing
      1. 0
        29 October 2025 12: 12
        Well, yesterday our Airbus, made entirely from Russian components, took flight. smile
        1. +4
          29 October 2025 12: 19
          So, it turns out we haven't lost everything? Not all the technology? That's progress. We hope that mass production of Russian Airbuses will finally push imported aircraft out of the market. And they'll be cheaper, cheaper, and more reliable. And most importantly, young people will be drawn to the factories, assembling Airbuses and manufacturing components. Those that haven't yet been given over to housing development, like the Volgograd Tractor Plant.
  7. +1
    29 October 2025 08: 14
    In China, they understand what place they occupy in the world, but here, "everyone says that we are in the right place, everyone says, but not many know what place" (c). Even if they know, they are embarrassed to say... laughing
    1. man
      +4
      29 October 2025 09: 20
      Quote: parusnik
      In China, they understand what place they occupy in the world, but here, "everyone says that we are in the right place, everyone says, but not many know what place" (c). Even if they know, they are embarrassed to say... laughing

      in the back sad
  8. +10
    29 October 2025 08: 46
    And so it always is. Soviet and Chinese communists, in a short period of about 35 years, created two world superpowers, while the communists' enemies, in the same amount of time after they created their state, proved so stupid and incompetent that they couldn't even preserve what they had gotten for free from the communists and their supporters. They ruined entire industries, and for all those 35 years they simply parasitized on the results of their labor.
    BUT at the same time they believe that they have every right to engage in manic criticism of what the communists did, how they worked and are working.
    1. 0
      29 October 2025 09: 59
      Quote: tatra
      In a short period of about 35 years, Soviet and Chinese communists created two world superpowers.

      China became a superpower when it abandoned the ideas of communism and began to build capitalism.
      1. +1
        29 October 2025 10: 25
        Ha, so you, the enemies of the communists, did the same thing, but you only managed to ruin everything compared to those who had the “ideas of Marxism-Leninism.”
        And in 35 years you still haven’t developed your own ideology FOR, your entire ideology is AGAINST.
        1. +1
          29 October 2025 12: 51
          Quote: tatra
          Ha, so you, the enemies of the communists, did the same thing.

          So, do you agree that China became a superpower only after replacing Mao's communism with Deng's capitalism?
  9. +2
    29 October 2025 10: 28
    It's great that someone has come forward and drawn attention to what could be called an epochal event – ​​the CPC Plenum – which affects the entire world, compared to which the agitation industry's petty squabbles around the US and EU seem like a trifle.
    Such a large-scale and simultaneous (!) purge of the generals in the PRC army clearly indicates a tendency in the army's senior leadership to resolve the Taiwan issue by force.
    If this was connected with corruption, they would have removed them from office in the usual manner (in the PRC they are strict about this and the mechanism is well-established), firstly, not everyone at once, and secondly, they would not have brought it to the plenum of the Central Committee.
    It is even more naive to link the generals' dismissal "to the development of China's economy along capitalist lines." The plenum once again emphasized the country's development based on the ideas of Marxism-Leninism, Zedong Thought, and Xiaoping Theory, which can be summarized as encouraging private enterprise under the leadership of the CPC—something that V.I. Lenin outlined in the New Economic Policy, Xiaoping made the foundation of economic reforms, and which the CPC develops and expands according to specific conditions and times.
    China pursues a non-aligned policy, not limiting its development within any bloc framework, and advocates for open global markets, primarily the US and EU as its main trading partners and leading global centers, which fear competition and pursue a policy of protectionism, blackmail, and threats against China.
    1. -2
      29 October 2025 17: 52
      Xiaoping and Zedong are given names, not surnames. We're talking about the ideas of Mao and Deng, not the ideas of Zedong and Xiaoping.
      1. 0
        2 November 2025 00: 25
        Well, someone gave me two downvotes. However, Xiaoping and Zedong are first names, not last names. It would be foolish, gentlemen, to deny it.
  10. +6
    29 October 2025 10: 51
    Quote: Boris55
    Should I list for you what Bolshevik Putin has done for the people and the country since the beginning of the century?

    Bolsheviks don't go to church...
    1. -3
      29 October 2025 11: 18
      Quote: LuZappa
      Quote: Boris55
      Should I list for you what Bolshevik Putin has done for the people and the country since the beginning of the century?

      Bolsheviks don't go to church...
      -They negotiated with the church hierarchs...
      1. +2
        29 October 2025 12: 07
        Quote: your1970
        -They negotiated with the church hierarchs...

        I wonder what it's about? feel
        1. 0
          29 October 2025 12: 51
          Quote: Uncle Lee
          Quote: your1970
          -They negotiated with the church hierarchs...

          I wonder what it's about? feel

          On September 4, 1943, a secret meeting between Metropolitans Sergius (Stragorodsky), Alexy (Simansky), and Nikolai (Yarushevich) and I.V. Stalin took place in the Kremlin. As a result, the Church's situation was significantly eased: the authorities permitted the opening of some churches, monasteries, and even seminaries, the publication of the official journal of the Moscow Patriarchate, and finally the election of a Patriarch.
          1. +7
            29 October 2025 12: 59
            Yes, it was....Stalin gave the church some leniency.
            He himself didn’t go to church, didn’t bow, didn’t kiss icons, didn’t light candles, didn’t cross himself in public, unlike today’s former communists...
  11. +4
    29 October 2025 11: 31
    Quote: Boris55
    Changes to pensions do not violate the Constitution (Article 55).

    They're breaking his own promises. However, there's complete continuity here: there will be no reform, I'll lie down on the rails, etc.
  12. +2
    29 October 2025 11: 38
    Quote from AdAstra
    Hey, you this, that, let's not misbehave, or do you not believe that "We have never lived as well as today" (c)? Yes

    No matter how we live today, tomorrow will only get worse...
    1. +1
      29 October 2025 13: 59
      Pessimist - everything is bad, it can't get any worse... Optimist - there's still room for improvement, there's still room for improvement!
      Seriously speaking, what hope is there under the rule of those who have everything in the West and with the West, no matter how much they puff out their cheeks, Russia is just a cash cow and a squeeze lemon.
  13. +1
    29 October 2025 12: 15
    Quote: Uncle Lee
    Quote: your1970
    -They negotiated with the church hierarchs...

    I wonder what it's about? feel

    Well, for example, at the end of the last century, priests imported and sold tobacco duty-free...
    1. -2
      29 October 2025 12: 54
      Quote: LuZappa
      Quote: Uncle Lee
      Quote: your1970
      -They negotiated with the church hierarchs...

      I wonder what it's about? feel

      Well, for example, at the end of the last century, priests imported and sold tobacco duty-free...

      What does this have to do with
      Quote: LuZappa
      Bolsheviks
      ?
  14. 0
    29 October 2025 14: 02
    Quote: your1970
    Quote: LuZappa
    Quote: Uncle Lee
    Quote: your1970
    -They negotiated with the church hierarchs...

    I wonder what it's about? feel

    Well, for example, at the end of the last century, priests imported and sold tobacco duty-free...

    What does this have to do with
    Quote: LuZappa
    Bolsheviks
    ?

    Our entire leadership at the end of the 20th century was Bolshevik flesh and blood. Aren't they?
  15. 0
    29 October 2025 14: 04
    Quote: Per se.
    Pessimist - everything is bad, it can't get any worse... Optimist - there's still room for improvement, there's still room for improvement!
    Seriously speaking, what hope is there under the rule of those who have everything in the West and with the West, no matter how much they puff out their cheeks, Russia is just a cash cow and a squeeze lemon.

    The average person in any part of the world can only hope for themselves and that they won't be noticed or squashed like a bug for any small reason...
  16. 0
    29 October 2025 14: 06
    "We must firmly adhere to Marxism-Leninism" – 4th Plenary Session of the CPC Central Committee

    With the kind of "Marxism-Leninism" that's happening in China, Marx and Lenin would have turned over in their graves, taking Engels with them :((...
  17. +1
    29 October 2025 15: 32
    18% of GDP, not at the propaganda PPP, but at face value

    Propaganda is the so-called "nominal", or more precisely, GDP at the exchange rate of the corresponding currencies.
    This "nominal" applies only to external exports in GDP - no more than 10-20% of GDP.
    Real GDP - 80-90% can be estimated only at the parity exchange rate.
    At the nominal rate, China produces fewer drones at a cost than the US, but at parity, it produces many times more.
    1. +1
      29 October 2025 19: 00
      Last year, foreign trade accounted for 37,8% of China's GDP. That's quite a bit...
  18. 0
    29 October 2025 20: 04
    Given that Marx's works are primarily concerned with the theoretical study of the weak and destructive mechanisms of capitalism, while Lenin had already witnessed the manifestation of these destructive effects and was able to justify the emergence of new capitalist actions to preserve markets, it is not surprising that China exists and is developing. They are literally developing by exploiting capital's weaknesses. As Lenin predicted, big capital, having reached the ceiling of its optimal production price, will shift production to other regions and countries to further shift the cost of production to an even more profitable level.
    In the late 80s, China realized that the USSR was in crisis and that people who would restore capitalism had come to power. They would then become the only major country with, if not a capitalist, then at least a socialist ideology. Yet, the country boasts a high literacy rate, a large workforce, and, due to limited mechanization, low labor costs. Knowing that big capital in Europe and the US had long since peaked in production and had nowhere to grow, they themselves created the conditions for market economies to shift production.
    In other words, China realized that building full socialism overnight in a world where only capitalists remain would lead to collapse. Not because, as liberals like to say, "communism doesn't work," but because one country (even a very large one) cannot withstand the pressure of all the other capitalist countries.
    The only way to survive and develop is by manipulating capital's weaknesses, integrating into its operations, and placing it in a position of codependency. This allowed China not only to survive but also to develop into a major power (especially considering the scale and number of domestic projects in China and the United States). Having secured this niche, China began to use market methods (because our global diplomacy and trade are capitalist) to squeeze out competitors. China understands that there is no such thing as nobility; there is only one important task: preserving the country, preferably by eliminating or weakening competitors.
    China learns from the works of the classics and from the experience of the USSR. At the same time, it always observes the experiences of capitalist countries themselves. China doesn't dwell on slogans; it monitors what's happening in the world and learns from the experiences of others.
    There can be a lot of debate about whether "They are not communists, they are capitalists and act like any major imperialist," or whether "they crushed the liberals and only real communists remain there," etc.
    But the Chinese themselves are not busy throwing around slogans; the Chinese are working.
    Our politicians can cleverly invent reasons/excuses/reasons to explain why communism is bad and capitalism is good. And then, under these discussions, raise VAT/retirement age/interest rates, etc. And just a couple of months later, during the May holidays, they dress up in red and proudly talk about the successes of the Soviet Union, as if they had something to do with them (and then close the Mausoleum).
    1. 0
      29 October 2025 20: 12
      Moreover
      When feudalism began to lose out to the developing bourgeois (capitalist) movement, it too faced the fact that the first generations of bourgeois movements used feudal mechanisms to fight feudalism itself. This struggle included revolutions and wars, and, naturally, casualties. Did the presence of casualties mean that bourgeoisism should surrender? No, the bourgeois system will prevail and lead the world to a new level of technological development. I don't see any discussion anywhere of capitalists criticizing their use of feudal levers in the early stages of their development. So why should China repent or abandon market (bourgeois) instruments in the struggle to spread socialist ideas?
      1. 0
        31 October 2025 07: 09
        Quote: Mustachioed Kok
        No, the bourgeois system will triumph and bring the world to a new level of technological development. I don't see any talk anywhere of capitalists criticizing their use of feudal leverage at the beginning of development.
        I wonder what kind of feudal mechanisms the bourgeoisie used?
        1. 0
          31 October 2025 12: 18
          Well, at least some of the early bourgeoisie took advantage of their feudal status to start some kind of production. Or, for example, they used their feudal status to create favorable conditions for themselves. Like the British, who converted many lands to sheep grazing to provide raw materials for their textile factories. Those who weren't nobles were forced to buy them. And if you weren't a great lord, you could simply decree what sheep were to be grazed on certain lands.
          And this is just what first came to mind.
          1. +1
            31 October 2025 13: 46
            You've described a rather unfeudal mechanism. The first bourgeoisie weren't feudal lords for the most part. They were, so to speak, guild masters, city dwellers. I just remembered the assignment of people to manufactories under Peter the Great. But the example of Russia and England isn't representative either. In France, for example, feudal lords fought tooth and nail for their position and even tried to reverse everything after the bourgeois revolution.
  19. 0
    29 October 2025 22: 21
    Sun Tzu.
    War is the path of deception.
    War is a continuation of diplomacy (politics) by other methods.
    Both with opponents and with allies.
  20. -1
    30 October 2025 10: 52
    The author doesn't like the GDP based on PPP. I've been to Norway a couple of times. It's a rich country, no doubt about it. But we decided to share a taxi to the airport with three of us—a bummer, because it cost 800 kroner. That's 6500 rubles in our money. And here, 2000 is easily enough. We went to a restaurant—a bottle of cheap wine and a main course for two—1000 kroner, or 8000 rubles. The restaurant was more like a cafeteria with a waiter. It wasn't tasty, and it wasn't interesting. I looked at the meat at the store—there was a selection, but the price tag...
    And – the icing on the cake – every Norwegian citizen is charged three taxes: state, municipal, and… church, totaling 30% of the average salary. Let's do the math: the average salary in Norway is 50,000 kroner. That's 600,000 rubles. A lot!!! Subtract taxes – 420,000. Prices triple – and we get 140,000 rubles in our real world. Well, that's okay, basically. My son, after his third year of college, earns 130,000 in a regular job. But he works in Russia. That's the math. I advise the author to think not about the clouds, but about what it's like on the ground. It's not for nothing that the IMF and the World Bank calculate GDP both ways – using PPP, it's clear what a local can afford…
    1. +2
      30 October 2025 19: 41
      Quote: Glagol1
      But we figured out a way to share a taxi to the airport—a lucky break, since it cost 800 crowns. That's 6500 rubles in our money. And here, it's easily 2000.

      Andrey, let's do it this way... It's normal for a Russian average salary to be 70,000 rubles to pay 2,000 rubles for a taxi. But for them, with an average salary in the country of 600, paying 6500 rubles isn't normal? Actually, it turns out that 1/35 of our salary is 2,000 rubles, and for them, 1/85 of their salary is 6500 rubles. So, the difference is almost three times, which means their average income is higher. I used only math.
    2. -1
      31 October 2025 06: 29
      It's not for nothing that the IMF and the World Bank calculate GDP in both ways – because PPP makes it clear what a local resident can afford…

      Complete nonsense. The IMF doesn't count anything; national statistical agencies provide them with information.

      In your opinion, an Arab from Egypt is richer on parity than your son with 130 thousand, and your son is richer than a Norwegian.
      You, with your parity GDP in Norway, look poor, and a Norwegian, with his parity GDP in Russia, looks rich.
  21. +1
    30 October 2025 12: 49
    Quote: Level 2 Advisor
    Okay, let's start with 2012. Just try to evaluate not the merits of 20 years ago, which were there, of course.

    Despite all my skepticism, I cannot help but acknowledge the annexation of Crimea in 2014 as a merit...
  22. +1
    1 November 2025 16: 04
    Zyuganov!
    Why did you surrender your election victory to Yeltsin?
    I've had no confidence in the Communist Party of the Russian Federation since that very moment. And as for Marxism... Evil tongues claim that no one has studied Marxism as thoroughly as the capitalists. They studied it and adopted it into practice, like a sweatshop.
  23. 0
    4 November 2025 07: 47
    That article's title shouldn't have been like that! Chinese politics have nothing to do with either Marxism or Leninism. As noted in the article, they have their own specifics, their own path. And maybe that's precisely why this is so good—it shows that their choice is the more correct one.