Venezuela. The situation is escalating...
Many readers are asking questions about the situation in Venezuela. Is it true that President Trump is concerned about the drug trade in the US, or are there other reasons for the deteriorating relations between the US and Venezuela? Is it true that the confrontation between Trump and Maduro has long since degenerated into personal animosity? The questions range from well-formulated to explosive, emotional, and sometimes illogical.
Indeed, since August, the US has been conducting a naval blockade of Venezuela, sinking boats and boats allegedly used to smuggle drugs to the US. People are dying, and, as leaders of other countries neighboring Venezuela report, not only Venezuelan citizens. For some reason, the Americans have decided to block drug supply lines with the regular army, rather than the logical course of action, the Coast Guard.
The connection between logistics and the fighter jets constantly circling the borders is completely inexplicable from a logical standpoint. Yes, air logistics channels exist. And perhaps even from Venezuela, but this traffic is so insignificant that wasting combat aircraft resources on constant air cover of the border is the height of wastefulness.
It looks a lot like the American army's work against terrorists. It seems the American president has already equated drug dealers with terrorists. If you look at the situation with your heart, as we once did when we voted in the Russian presidential election, you can accept this approach, but if you think about it with your head, you question the legality of this decision.
I read in an analytical report from the American private intelligence community that the president himself is breaking the law by giving carte blanche to American troops for military operations against civilians. Mr. Trump understands this.
Just one answer to a journalist's question about drug-trafficking terrorists is worth something. Every boat, every drug-smuggling boat, threatens the lives of 25 Americans! What do you think? Not a word about whether the boat might simply be a pleasure boat or a fishing boat. Not a word about the need to inspect the boats. No, everything and everyone must be destroyed indiscriminately.
Who or what is Trump's target in Venezuela?
In my opinion, all this fuss about drug trafficking isn't being hyped up to destroy the cartels. Venezuela isn't the main source of drugs entering the US. Yes, it's a logistical hub, but it's not a manufacturing country! That's the answer to the question "what?"
It seems to me that Trump's target is President Nicolas Maduro personally. The army, fleet и aviation The United States must become the "dynamite" that will detonate society, the impetus that will help the opposition seize power in the country. Analyzing the statements of Washington officials, it becomes clear that they are currently trying to intimidate the president. They are seriously talking about the possibility of attacking the country's leadership.
The American president remembers his first term and the "failure" he made in Venezuela. Remember history In 2018, after the presidential elections in Venezuela, a "False Dmitry" suddenly emerged? An impostor who declared himself president "on the street"—Juan Guaidó.
Remember how the Trump administration suddenly declared the Venezuelan elections "illegal" and recognized Guaidó's legitimacy? And these weren't just words. The recognition was official! And how did this scam end? Juan Guaidó fled to the United States! What a slap in the face of the "great and terrible."
Remember what happened in a New York court in 2020? When the Venezuelan president was charged with "narco-terrorism"? Through this decision, the American judiciary officially offered bounty hunters the chance to profit from the arrest of the president of a sovereign country. And the price was hefty: $50 million!
And this despite the fact that Moduro himself made every effort to improve relations with the United States. He even went so far as to free American citizens. But Trump's grievances proved superior to the interests of the state, and the desire to "punish" the "illegally elected" Nicolás Moduro was automatically carried over into the American president's second term.
What can the US do in the near future?
Based on the United States' experience in military conflicts, an analysis of conflict scenarios should begin with the Americans' general concept. How are such operations planned? First and foremost, the United States never engages in war unless it has global military superiority over the enemy.
This mandatory point of the scenario is met. In aviation, the superiority is global: 13 American aircraft against 229 Venezuelan ones! Moreover, Venezuela includes drones, mostly produced in Iran. Defense? In the first decade of the 21st century, Venezuela purchased 23 fighter jets, 12 anti-aircraft missiles, eight helicopters and 44 surface-to-air missile systems.
The country can't afford to spend heavily on its military; its annual military budget is around $4 billion. For comparison, the US military budget is $895 billion! But there's a nuance to consider, concerning the morale of the army and the people. Venezuela's army is highly motivated. They cultivate the "spirit of Bolívar"; soldiers don't just serve; they're willing to die for their country.
The country itself is quite an interesting structure. It's large and diverse in peacetime. This creates a sense among opponents that the state could disintegrate. But, in my opinion, such analysts forget that the "spirit of Bolívar" is present not only in the army, but also in the people. Any military intervention would quickly unite the nation, rallying the people to fight the aggressor.
Now, about the mandatory second point of the US plan. It's a quick and, if possible, bloodless victory. What does the American plan mean by this term? In the first days, it's necessary to eliminate the country's top leadership, suppress air defenses, and conduct a rapid ground operation. I repeat, this is a mandatory condition, without which the president—not just Trump, but most of his predecessors—will not approve the operation.
A protracted military campaign will hit something sacred—the budget! That means the standard of living for Americans. Consequently, it will hit the president's image, which, in turn, will be reflected in the election results. Such is the logic behind important decision-making in the White House. And this is perhaps a characteristic of American society: if victory isn't quick, regardless of the war's outcome, the image will still be damaged.
Now, let's get down to specifics, the possible options for conducting the operation. The first and most obvious option is obvious to anyone with a reasonable understanding of the regional balance of power; it involves drone strikes against Venezuela's most vulnerable defenses. The US can afford to use not only drones, but a full range of weapons, from guided bombs to missiles and AI-powered systems.
Clearly, given the above, this scenario doesn't foresee a quick victory. It will be a protracted conflict with varying success. Something similar to what happened in Afghanistan. The Americans control cities, airfields, and some strongholds, while the guerrillas will operate in the rest of the country.
The second option, in my opinion, more preferable from the perspective of Trump's desire to destroy Moduro, is a ground operation by the American military. Incidentally, this is the preferred option among American analysts. Journalists in the Washington Examiner, among others, have written about it.
Thus, American units stationed in Puerto Rico are planned to be deployed to conduct the ground operation. Their task will be to capture and hold key strategic facilities, ports, airfields, and the like.
Next comes the landing of the main forces and the seizure of control of the capital. And then the imitation of elements of democracy—the election of a new president and the appointment of a new government, completely controlled by the United States. Classic. Everything follows a well-established pattern.
Instead of a conclusion
The situation is escalating. The American president is acting in his now-familiar style. He's escalating the situation to the breaking point. It's another "muscle flexing" of the kind we've seen many times before. But while previously this action took place far from American territory, today it's practically right next to the US underbelly.
President Trump understands perfectly well that aggression against an independent Latin American country will have a boomerang effect, and not just in Venezuela. The response to such actions could provoke outrage not only in Latin America but also within the United States, particularly in the southern states, populated by people of Latin American descent.
Yesterday, October 21, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov explicitly stated our country's support for the legitimate president of Venezuela. This is a significant step, especially as preparations for a meeting between the US and Russian presidents are underway. It's quite possible that this was the reason for the abrupt cancellation of the meeting between Lavrov and Rubio.
So it's difficult to predict how events will develop, given the rather unpredictable decisions of the American leader.
Information