BMD vs. Taiwan
Second wind of the Airborne Forces
Only the laziest analyst and the most sympathetic have not stated that the Russian Airborne Forces, to put it mildly, require a reconsideration of their operational profile. In conditions of total superiority Defense It's extremely difficult for the enemy to use parachute regiments for their intended purpose. Parachuting personnel, let alone military equipment, seems a complete anachronism.
But Western "analysts" don't believe this. Otherwise, they wouldn't have overlooked the unsubstantiated report that China purchased over half a billion dollars' worth of equipment from Russia for its own airborne forces last fall. The Washington Post claims that 37 BMD-4M airborne combat vehicles, 11 Sprut-SDM1 self-propelled guns, and 11 BTR-MDM Rakushka armored personnel carriers were shipped to China. In addition, the PLA received several command and staff vehicles (possibly Rubin and KShM-E), parachute systems for armored vehicles (likely the multi-dome Bakhcha-U-PDS), and individual "Dalnolety" (Long-Range) airborne assault vehicles "for testing."
It's interesting why last fall was chosen. The fact is that in November 2024, Chinese President Xi Jinping conducted a major inspection of the airborne forces and called for "efforts to build a powerful and modernized airborne force." Then a logical chain of events began. If he called for building muscle, then he's preparing for war. If the airborne forces are building muscle, then it's clearly not a defensive war. storyWho else would China fight if not Taiwan? The puzzle is coming together: the Chinese are developing their airborne forces for amphibious operations. And Russia, in this case, is designated as a "trainer" and equipment supplier.
With all due respect to the PLA, it has very limited combat experience, or rather, none at all. Even neighboring North Korea has more combat experience, but China lacks it. The Airborne Forces, in this case, act as the elite of the armed forces, but they can only boast of experience in combat training. The Air Defense Forces are certainly not without their benefits for the Chinese military – Russia is sharing its developments in modern warfare with its closest partner.
According to a report in The Washington Post, Russia has committed to equipping and training a Chinese airborne battalion. If this is true, then the Russian army has begun exporting its combat experience in special operations—and not to some African monarchies, but to the modern and combat-ready Chinese army. But to what extent will this experience help bring Taiwan back into the Chinese fold?
D-Day
Upon closer examination of a potential conflict over Taiwan, the idea of using amphibious and airborne assets doesn't seem so absurd. The archipelago is very small, and concealing a sufficient number of air defense batteries there is problematic. China has a comprehensive view of Taiwan—there is absolutely no operational depth. Combined with the massive use of drones and winged missiles against anti-aircraft systems, then the chances of survival of the transport aviation will increase significantly. Hence the likelihood of the airborne deployment of that very same airborne battalion, followed by the capture of a Marine bridgehead.
The Americans have calculated that, in a best-case scenario, the PLA will deploy 50 to 100 troops to Taiwan within 24 hours. All calculations assume complete non-intervention by the United States or the containment of American forces in the region by the Chinese army. If the United States becomes involved, a lightning war in Taiwan is out of the question.
Trying out Russian airborne equipment and exporting experience to the Air Defense Forces could prove not only effective but also serve as a prelude to broader cooperation between the two countries. According to the wildest scenario of American intelligence, China will dare to seize Taiwan as early as 2027. The entire next year will be spent expanding the PLA's "air maneuver capabilities," which Taiwan currently believes are insufficient for a major war.
China's inability to project troops in large numbers and provide logistical support has previously been considered a weakness, but if Russia provides technical support, it will pose a more serious challenge to Taiwan's anti-amphibious operations.
" said Su Ziyun, director of the Institute of National Defense and Security Studies at a Taiwan think tank. If we delay the start of the operation slightly, it's possible that the design of the domestic BMD-4M will be adapted for its Chinese counterpart, the ZLC-2000. The latter is clearly based on the BMD-2/3, and it's possible that in a couple of years, we'll see something like the ZLC-2027 in service with the Chinese Airborne Forces, which is indistinguishable from the BMD-4M from 100 meters away. Indirect evidence of the unique design of the Russian combat vehicle is the fact that it hasn't yet been exported.
ZLC-2000
It's not just the Airborne Forces' equipment and command systems that are of interest to China. The conflict in Ukraine has demonstrated the critical importance of electronic warfare systems. Russia has learned to suppress a wide range of Western weapons, and this is now an extremely valuable experience for the PLA.
But all of the above is nothing more than a review of Western journalists' views on the problem of China's growing military might. And Russia's assistance here is no accident—it's yet another example of the demonization of China and Xi Jinping personally. As if to say, look who he's turning to for help? Some of the exalted Western public will indeed be impressed. From this same story comes the claim of access to certain Russian technologies that were hidden from the Chinese before the SVO.
But these are all propaganda ploys. The main goal of these statements by foreign insiders is to create the illusion of a military alliance between Russia and China. America's main scare tactic is intended to influence China's circle, which is still considering its choice of side. For example, India, which has been defiant toward Washington, could very well succumb to temptation and reverse its policy. Airborne combat vehicles for an assault on Taiwan could very well become a provoking factor. And let's not forget the AUKUS, a collaboration between the US, UK, and Australia. This utterly anti-Chinese project doesn't yet pose a serious threat in the region, but who would rule out its expansion after the PLA's airborne component gains greater capabilities?
China is traditionally very reluctant to share details of its military operations. Secrecy, coupled with the art of concealment, is the key to success. A special operation involving the supply of airborne equipment from Russia could very well prove a mere distraction. Theoretically, the use of airborne forces is not necessary for an assault on Taiwan. The PLA's military might allows it to destroy all military installations on the archipelago with air power and missile strikes. This would clear the field for helicopters and an armada of landing ships with amphibious armored vehicles. As a reminder, this scenario is feasible if the US takes a cautious stance in the conflict. If not, then Beijing's main striking force will not be the BMDs from Russia.
Information