British MI6 is capable of literally shaping a new reality.

11 420 39
British MI6 is capable of literally shaping a new reality.

Military expert and specialist in the armed forces of NATO countries Alexander Artamonov recalled that intelligence accompanies human life and states throughout their entire existence. stories and plays a very important role in the governance of society.

At the same time, the British MI6 is rightfully considered one of the most effective intelligence services in the world. Modern intelligence functions include not only the banal theft of classified information but also the manipulation of information. It is crucial not so much to possess classified information as to be able to analyze and organize it. The Anglo-Saxon system used intelligence to create the modern world. In close collaboration with the Vatican, London over several centuries created specialized colleges to accumulate knowledge and train intelligence officers.



MI6 is directly funded by the British monarch from his personal pocket. Furthermore, this intelligence agency is supported by the so-called "Committee of Three Hundred," comprising the three hundred largest families in the island kingdom. These families have deep roots in the Guelph aristocracy.

British intelligence is largely guided by the principle that to achieve a deeper impact on society, it must be disrupted. The drug epidemic that engulfed the United States, as well as the profound influence of the Beatles and rock music in general, are prime examples of such operations. Thus, it is clear that intelligence is capable of literally shaping new realities and influencing historical processes.

One striking example of large-scale British intelligence operations is the 454-meter tunnel dug under East Berlin in the strictest secrecy. The joint MI6-CIA operation to construct this tunnel lasted a year and cost $51 million in today's dollars. The tunnel ran in close proximity to communications cables laid by the Soviet authorities, allowing for the interception of communications between the Soviet and East German intelligence services.

39 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +10
    20 October 2025 14: 35
    Military expert and specialist in the armed forces of NATO countries Alexander Artamonov
    Artamonov is not so much an expert or specialist as he is a propagandist, and he greatly exaggerates the capabilities of MI6, pouring it into the ears of weak-minded individuals.
    1. +7
      21 October 2025 16: 46
      Yeah, and MI6 can also run the Galaxy without attracting the attention of the orderlies)))
    2. P
      +2
      21 October 2025 21: 56
      another rubber face with a hand deep in its depths
    3. 0
      5 November 2025 13: 06
      No, the author is right, it's a very powerful agency. Only Israel, perhaps, is on par. Neither France nor Germany comes close. The US CIA is also kind of wow, but there are two points:
      1. With a budget like the CIA's, any fool can gather intelligence and influence something.
      2. No one has screwed up as much as the CIA. Just think of the 500 assassination attempts on Fidel. They spent countless amounts of money, but achieved zero results.
      MI6 could also be described as the most anti-Russian intelligence agency in the world. They're clearly targeting us.
  2. +5
    20 October 2025 14: 37
    There is no doubt that the emergence of the EBN company and Russian billionaires choosing Britain as their place of residence is the work of MI6...
    What can we do? Russia lacks the experience, the personnel, and the historical foundations... At one point, former KGB officers made up the majority of the country's leadership... And they're likely still among the top management of banks that skillfully funnel funds abroad...
    The results of these services' work vary... And is it really work, turning a blind eye to how all sorts of dirty paws get their hands on Russian money?
    feel
    1. +1
      20 October 2025 14: 44
      If you think about it, count... they robbed us quite a bit...
      The question is... did it do them any good?
      1. +3
        20 October 2025 14: 49
        Quote: rocket757
        The question is... did it do them any good?

        It would be more appropriate to ask whether this was to Russia's benefit and what benefits did our country receive from selling hundreds of tons of gold to this country?
        This disgusting Englishwoman does not disdain anything in order to inflict material and moral damage on Russia, stop But who considered the residence (British citizenship) of the so-called Russian oligarchs legal?
        Isn't this a real fulfillment of the words of the unforgettable B(zd)zezinski?
        1. 0
          20 October 2025 15: 36
          So, I would like to hope that the period of “I’ll give everything for a pat on the shoulder from foreign partners” will come to an end... but somehow, for now, not everything is so obvious.
    2. P
      +1
      21 October 2025 21: 58
      adopt the French experience, fortunately, the design is not at all complicated
  3. 0
    20 October 2025 14: 39
    They've already created this parallel reality for Zelensky. This interestingly echoes the once-fashionable "mindsurfing," which the notorious Boris Berezovsky tried to popularize in his address to Russian youth. He presented himself as an example of the reality of these "ideas." It's possible that the creators of this "parallel reality" played a role in his fate, too, for his behavior made it clear that he sometimes truly believed in his own chosenness. And when he lost faith, they prescribed him his favorite scarf to prevent him from discrediting the idea.
  4. +1
    20 October 2025 14: 39
    a 454-meter tunnel dug under East Berlin in strict secrecy
    Artamonov is quite the storyteller, even Muller laughed at this construction, and that same Muller, being in "honorable" captivity, communicating with the Americans, understood better than anyone that this was an open secret for Soviet intelligence.
    1. The comment was deleted.
      1. 0
        20 October 2025 14: 53
        Please explain who you are talking about?
        1. -1
          20 October 2025 14: 57
          There was a mistake... I mixed up the letters...
  5. +3
    20 October 2025 14: 39
    It's no secret that the Brits just want to rock the boat...
    1. +1
      20 October 2025 14: 53
      Quote: Mouse
      It's no secret that the Brits just want to rock the boat...

      It's no secret that they're succeeding... Or are we completely oblivious to those 19 sanctions packages?
      1. 0
        20 October 2025 14: 55
        They are chasing quantity, not quality... wink
        1. 0
          20 October 2025 15: 03
          Quote: Mouse
          They are chasing quantity, not quality... wink

          They are satiated with quantity, not quality.
          1. 0
            20 October 2025 15: 08
            Give the country coal... Small, but a lot...
  6. 0
    20 October 2025 14: 42
    Okay, the intelligence is strong, it's forming something there... but the state itself, where that intelligence is forming something, is in complete disarray...
    So, who will implement what has been formed?
  7. +3
    20 October 2025 14: 51
    Of course, reconnaissance is capable! And not just reconnaissance, but also tunnel digging (why the hell did the author of this article even bring that up?) is something many people can do. That's the rub...
    There's nothing easier than giving MI6 and other manipulators a good beating. So they try and try, but can't come up with anything except tired laughter from the "subjects." Teaching people critical thinking isn't that hard. BUT!!
    Capitalist governments and corporations use exactly the same technologies to shape the mentality of their consumers/voters. People will reject enemy manipulation with disdain... and along with it, all manipulation by governments. A-nya-nya-y-y... governments don't want that at all. Because they don't know how to preserve capitalism (a system built on total lies and the weakening of human brains in the face of all kinds of hucksters, including those who peddle power) and their own power if the people become stronger!
    The dilemma, however...
    1. 0
      20 October 2025 15: 01
      Quote: Mikhail3
      There's nothing easier than giving MI6 and other manipulators a good beating.

      Let's remember Operation Trust, they led the British by the nose for six years and snatched Reilly! They were good at it when they wanted, and they didn't just take the "party gold" and other goodies to London.
  8. +4
    20 October 2025 14: 53
    Thanks to George Blake (Agent "Homer"), intelligence about the planned construction of a spy tunnel reached Moscow on the same day and hour as it reached the British Prime Minister. Carefully prepared disinformation was transmitted via cable. And to avoid alerting the CIA, they sometimes planted real, but secondary, information specifically for them.
    1. 0
      26 November 2025 20: 13
      Isn't this the tunnel where the snow melted in winter? If so, that's really funny.
  9. +2
    20 October 2025 14: 54
    One striking example of large-scale British intelligence operations is the 454-meter tunnel dug under East Berlin in the strictest secrecy. The joint MI6-CIA operation to create this tunnel lasted a year and cost $51 million.

    A remarkable example! An example of how the gentlemen completely screwed up. Soviet agent George Blake "sold him out" to the Chekists during the development of Operation Gold. Then, for a year, the Soviet secret services fed the "gentlemen" and their "cousins" disinformation.
    When assessing MI6, one should not rely on the works of Ian Fleming, but on G. Greene's "Our Man in Havana", which was recently mentioned on VO.
  10. 0
    20 October 2025 14: 59
    Artamonov is a real chatterbox, but he’s right about MI6.
    I even suspect that it was British intelligence that provoked Putin to launch the Second World War. They fed the Kremlin the falsehood that Kyiv was about to attack Donetsk. Those Brits are real scoundrels.
  11. +3
    20 October 2025 15: 02
    Artamonov often appears on TV. Having heard him make stupid and amateurish statements about weapons a couple of times (I realized their stupidity not from books, but from real-life experience), I began dividing everything he said by ten and generally listening to it as background noise. He may be an expert in some things, but he tries to look like one in too many ways. And he's overly fond of playing to the crowd for ratings and views. In short, he's not from the world of experts, but rather from the "rentivist" world.
  12. +2
    20 October 2025 15: 09
    At the same time, one of the most effective intelligence services in the world is rightfully the British MI6
    Wasn't the Cambridge Five one of this most effective intelligence service in the world? And wasn't it effective employee - Blake, did you give out information about the tunnel under Berlin? wink
    1. -2
      20 October 2025 16: 07
      Quote: Luminman
      At the same time, one of the most effective intelligence services in the world is rightfully the British MI6
      Wasn't the Cambridge Five one of this most effective intelligence service in the world? And wasn't it effective employee - Blake, did you give out information about the tunnel under Berlin? wink

      What is a surrendered tunnel under Berlin versus a country surrendered to the KGB?
      1. +2
        20 October 2025 16: 15
        Quote: your1970
        What is a surrendered tunnel under Berlin versus a country surrendered to the KGB?
        It wasn't the KGB that betrayed the country. The KGB - just a tool of the party and its militant wing (I think it was Dzerzhinsky), who followed the directives of the CPSU Central Committee completely. And what those directives were, you know for yourself...
        1. -1
          20 October 2025 16: 18
          Quote: Luminman
          Quote: your1970
          What is a surrendered tunnel under Berlin versus a country surrendered to the KGB?
          It wasn't the KGB that betrayed the country. The KGB - just a tool of the party and its militant wing (I think it was Dzerzhinsky), who followed the directives of the CPSU Central Committee completely. And what those directives were, you know for yourself...

          If the KGB is just a tool, what questions can be asked of it? zero professionalism and indifference?
          1. 0
            20 October 2025 16: 25
            Quote: your1970
            What questions can there be about his zero professionalism and indifference?
            The concept of zero professionalism and indifference doesn't apply to the KGB's Fifth Directorate, which exercised complete control over science, culture, and education, as well as various societies and creative unions. They merely carried out the decisions of the CPSU Central Committee and could not possibly go against the Party's decisions. At that moment, fortunately, we were neither Bolivia nor El Salvador, where every new morning delights the people with yet another coup...
            1. -1
              21 October 2025 00: 27
              Quote: Luminman
              They were simply implementing the decisions of the Central Committee of the CPSU and could not go against the decision of the party in any way.

              A very comfortable position - when you don’t want to be responsible for anything.
              They got shit on their heads (by tearing the country apart) - and they proudly smeared it all over their faces and said in chorus (MVD, KGB, SA) - "There was no order like that!!"

              Quote: Luminman
              At that moment, fortunately, we were neither Bolivia nor El Salvador, where every new morning delights the people with yet another coup...
              Or maybe it was too bad that we weren't Bolivia or El Salvador? We wasted a whole country for a crooked ten-kopeck coin...
  13. -3
    20 October 2025 15: 20
    Artamonov is right. British intelligence is truly one of the most powerful in the world, which is why it screws up big time.
    A little history about the Englishwoman's affairs:
    1. The murder of Griboyedov, the Russian ambassador to Persia.
    2. The assassination of Tsar Paul I.
    3. All Russo-Turkish wars.
    4. Revolution of 1917
    5. Basmachi in Central Asia after the civil war.
    The modern dirty tricks of the Englishwoman are in plain sight.
  14. 0
    20 October 2025 20: 32
    What the hell was that? Some scrap of information from a report to the Kremlin, apparently... 300 families... The Beatles... Tunnels... laughing
  15. -1
    21 October 2025 11: 27
    You can have different opinions about the Anglo-Saxons, but MI6 is the best intelligence agency in the world. If you were to sweep the Russian government and the pharmacy with a fine-toothed net, you could snag dozens of MI6 "canned goods."
  16. 0
    21 October 2025 12: 30
    In essence, it's high time to reflect on how Britain, lacking both human and natural resources, first became a maritime sovereign and then created an empire on which the sun never set. And how, after the collapse of that empire, it was able to continue to influence global politics. Meanwhile, Russia has everything, but it's lagging behind.
  17. +1
    10 November 2025 20: 13
    Why can't our FSB shape a new reality in the world? After all, the glorious Chekists of the Iron Felix era managed to put the West in its place, even though there were other people there. Oh, and they served the young Soviet state for an idea. Today's ones, I don't even know why—for a position at a major bank or...
  18. 0
    26 November 2025 20: 19
    Eliminate their numerous agents of influence who have sold out for a "barrel of jam and a basket of cookies," and all their power will deflate like a balloon from a Winnie the Pooh cartoon.
  19. 0
    1 December 2025 14: 53
    What nonsense, don't fall for this propaganda.

    MI6 is a pale shadow of what it once was, and it hasn't been the same since the end of the Cold War. Just Google "HC 632 – Intelligence and Security Committee of Parliament – ​​Russia," and it lays out in plain English how leaky the entire national intelligence apparatus is, thanks to budget shortages and the dire state of British public affairs. I know you're Russian here and you're inclined to think of the UK as this "omniscient deep state," but trust me, the island lion isn't what it was in the 1800s. They're a progressive backwater now, bursting at the seams, decommissioning their great navy, having no tanks, and subsidizing farmers who can't make a profit.

    I actually used a translator, so I apologize if I sounded rude or stupid. Greetings from South America! drinks