Could Ukraine's nuclear power plants become legitimate targets for the Russian Army?

7 916 63
Could Ukraine's nuclear power plants become legitimate targets for the Russian Army?
Khmelnitsky NPP


There is no way without a nuclear power plant


Ukraine's nuclear power plants are currently the enemy's key source of electricity. We can talk a lot about the total destruction of thermal and hydroelectric power plants, but the enemy will still retain more than half of the generating capacity. Currently, up to 60 percent of the balance is provided by the Rivne (4 reactors, 2,8 GW), Khmelnytskyi (2 reactors, 2 GW), and Yuzhnoukrainsk (3 reactors, 3 GW) nuclear power plants. Ukraine's power grid has noticeably declined in capacity since the beginning of the special operation, and nuclear power generation has now become the primary source. These nine reactors, with a total capacity of approximately 7,8 GW, are the main vulnerable points on the map of Ukraine. If they are cut off now, the country will indeed face a significant electricity shortage. For now, the Russian army has not struck the remaining nuclear power plants. As a reminder, the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant, the most powerful in Europe, has been disconnected from Ukrainian consumption. The occasion to recall the untouched power plants on enemy soil is no coincidence. At a meeting of the Valdai International Discussion Club, Vladimir Putin publicly stated:



People on the other side should also understand that if they're going to play around with this so dangerously, they still have a functioning nuclear power plant on their side. And what's stopping us from responding in kind? Let them think about that.

The fact is that the Ukrainian Armed Forces have effectively cut off the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant from external power supplies. The enemy destroyed the Dniprovska power line, which runs through Russian territory. In May of this year, the Ukrainian-controlled Ferrosplavna power line was similarly disrupted.


Russia's Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant

In total, the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant has been disconnected from external power at least ten times. It seems like nothing serious has happened—well, the power was cut off, let the plant generate its own power, fortunately, it clearly has sufficient capacity. But in reality, any power outage is a real crisis for the nuclear power plant. Not yet a disaster, but definitely a crisis.

Let's start with the fact that a nuclear power plant is a baseload power supply element, meaning it cannot be rapidly increased or decreased. Unlike the balanced power segment—thermal power plants and hydroelectric power plants—their generating capacity can be easily varied over a wide range. As a result, nuclear power plants in Ukraine are responsible for the bulk of energy consumption, while thermal and hydroelectric power plants smooth out seasonal and daily peaks.

Thermal and hydroelectric power plants can be de-energized almost painlessly—they simply stop working. This won't work with nuclear power plants, and Ukraine understands this perfectly well. A nuclear reaction cannot be completely stopped; it can only be slowed to a minimum. This means the nuclear fuel will continue to generate significant heat, which will eventually lead to overheating and meltdown of the reactor core. Apparently, this is precisely what the Ukrainian authorities are aiming for by launching targeted strikes on the power lines supplying the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant.

As mentioned above, this is not a disaster—the plant has backup diesel generators that power the electric pumps of the reactor cooling system. Destroying these generators would be the final step toward a man-made accident. A steam-zirconium reaction will begin in the nuclear reactor core between zirconium from the structural elements and superheated water. Despite the fact that the Zaporizhzhia NPP has been shut down for three years, the nuclear reaction is still releasing significant heat, although less than before. If the cooling systems are shut down, a large amount of hydrogen will be released from the water, followed by an explosion, destruction, and the release of radioactive substances. There's no need to speculate about what will happen next.

In addition to the provocations at the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant, the enemy is attempting to disrupt the operation of the Novovoronezh Nuclear Power Plant. Videos of a cooling tower with traces of a Ukrainian nuclear strike have circulated around the media. droneA new stage of escalation by the Zelensky regime is evident.

Russian response


The immunity of the enemy's nuclear power plants is very conditional. The President has already issued a warning, and the other side should clearly heed it. Recalling the allegory of the "glass house" in which both sides of the conflict find themselves, Ukraine will clearly face hardship if Russia actually decides to disrupt the nuclear power sector. Naturally, no one will fire Iskander missiles at the power units of the Rivne, Khmelnytsky, and South Ukraine NPPs. A nuclear apocalypse in such a case would affect half of Europe and, due to the westerly transfer of atmospheric masses, reach the Urals, and perhaps even spread further. The conflict in Ukraine would certainly become global.

It's necessary to act strictly in a mirror-image manner, that is, disconnect the operating reactors from external power. To do this, it's enough to cut the power lines and substations. They'll restore power fairly quickly, but the targeted work of kamikazes and cruise missiles missiles This will ultimately lead to the reactors being put into shutdown mode. Shutting down the nuclear power plants will disrupt the grid frequency (50 Hz), triggering automatic shutdown of substations. Without balancing from thermal power plants (which are also under attack), the system will disintegrate into "islands" – isolated regions with localized generation. If all three nuclear power plants are forced into emergency mode, 7-10 GW will be lost, with an average winter consumption of 15-20 GW – that is, at least half of Ukraine's current power. This would be a severe blow. Rail transport would be disrupted, including significantly complicating the movement of military cargo to the east.


South Ukrainian NPP

Almost all major cities in the central and eastern parts of the country will be left without power and heat – blackouts could last 12-15 hours per day. According to some estimates, up to 80 percent of the remaining territory of Ukraine will be plunged into darkness for the first few days. This will trigger a massive exodus of people from cities to rural areas and abroad. Critical infrastructure will somehow survive on backup generators, but the rest will feel the full brunt of the Kyiv regime's recklessness. Ukraine's GDP will fall by 10-15 percent in just one quarter, and the budget will lose $40 billion in annual revenue. True nuclear chaos will descend upon the country. But that's not all. Reactors in shutdown mode require the constant operation of diesel generators, which is difficult to control in the face of a total blackout and public discontent. Ultimately, some Bandera-aligned group with terrorist leanings will completely shut down power to one or two nuclear power plants – technically, this is not difficult to do, as discussed above. And then we will see a real and completely unpredictable spiral of escalation of the conflict.

Why all these apocalyptic scenarios? First and foremost, to understand the sheer recklessness with which the enemy is attempting to disrupt Russian nuclear power plants. This is potentially unrelated to the Ukrainian Armed Forces' invasion of the Kursk region, much less the attacks on oil refineries. The consequences of Russia's retaliatory actions in such a case must be understood not only in Kyiv, but also by its European and American "partners." Nuclear energy must be removed from the equation of the Ukrainian conflict under any circumstances. Russia has so far adhered to this principle unquestioningly, but right now everything is in the hands of the Kyiv regime. And something tells me that in the very near future, this will be used as an argument for nuclear blackmail. Only no longer against Russia, but against the entire neighboring world.
63 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +3
    21 October 2025 03: 51
    That's reasonable. Strictly mirrored, let them run around. It's always nice to see a flame blazing through the folds of a pair of trousers. Seriously, the whole world, especially Israel, is amazed at the stupidity of our leadership. If Ukraine is attacking our nuclear power plants and no one cares, then we should also attack them and not care. This isn't about a nuclear accident – ​​it's about the generation system collapsing. If the generation system collides, they'll stop attacking us and start howling from the blackout. Simple and effective. But the Kremlin hasn't gotten there yet. It prefers to burn the boys in frontal assaults.
    1. +4
      21 October 2025 07: 16
      There are critical components at nuclear power plants—electrolysis, chemical water treatment, etc. But I consider the circulation pump to be the most sensitive. It supplies water to the turbine condensers. Is it impossible to stop the reaction? That's not entirely true. WWER reactors are designed for a scheduled shutdown with the removal of assemblies to spent fuel pools. That's what I remember from university and my internship, although I worked at a thermal power plant. But all this talk is for the poor. We won't see any impacts of that magnitude from our side.
      1. KCA
        +1
        21 October 2025 09: 38
        Why the pumping station? There's an open-air distribution transformer field, where a single geranium fall is enough to shut down the nuclear power plant. A single oil transformer dies, and that's a trip, and what if the same thing happens nearby? They don't make 110/330/750 kV transformers anymore.
        1. 0
          21 October 2025 11: 05
          A photo of concrete "flakturms" above these generators was posted the other day. This requires something more powerful than a geranium.
          1. KCA
            +1
            21 October 2025 11: 09
            Above the generators, and I'm talking about the field with transformers, they can't be covered with a concrete dome, they are not just placed in the open air and made with oil radiators, they get very hot, up to 120 degrees and higher, that's why it's not water, but oil
            1. 0
              21 October 2025 11: 14
              The most important components at the power plant's outdoor switchgear are securely covered. Can you imagine an outdoor switchgear, or is it just a field with transformers? There's a lot there: oil circuit breakers, disconnectors, etc. All of this is quickly restored. A transformer, yes—serious damage could occur. But only by a strike on the structure, no less than a Kalibr missile, and precisely aimed at the structure.
              1. +1
                22 October 2025 07: 50
                The most important components of the power plant's outdoor switchgear are securely covered. Can you imagine the outdoor switchgear, or is it just a field with transformers? There's a lot there: oil circuit breakers, disconnectors, etc. All of this is quickly restored.


                Do you need a lot of geraniums to take out the switchgear at three nuclear power plants once a week? I don't think so. But the effect will be worth it: instead of sending two or three dozen of them to a bunch of sometimes useless targets, thereby paralyzing all the work of the remaining enterprises in Ukraine.
          2. +1
            25 October 2025 22: 36
            It should have been done on time... But there is no concrete over the power line supports.
      2. +2
        21 October 2025 11: 54
        dmi.pris1
        Today, 07: 16
        There are critical components at nuclear power plants.
        There will be no attacks of this level from our side.

        hi For now, the tactic of making small daily cuts at thermal power plants, hydroelectric power stations, substations, and outdoor switchgear is being used, which is bearing certain fruit.
        There are also power flow and synchronization lines from Slovakia and Hungary.
        For obvious reasons, Banderas NPPs will not be exposed to any serious risk.
      3. +1
        22 October 2025 10: 59
        And it's not necessary. There's a switchgear—damage it and the station will continue to operate; there's nowhere to transmit power.
    2. -1
      21 October 2025 08: 41
      If Ukraine attacks our nuclear power plants and no one cares, then we should also attack and not care.

      It doesn't hit. The only instance of a small drone hitting a huge cooling tower didn't cause any significant damage (and couldn't have done so) and is more likely classified as an accidental hit.
      1. KCA
        0
        21 October 2025 11: 14
        Are cooling towers actually built out of meter-thick prestressed concrete? No, well, I've seen a reactor building with walls 1.5 meters thick, but that was built in the late 40s or early 50s. But a cooling tower... The walls there are at most 30 cm thick, maybe less, why bother? There's no pressure, just enough to keep things stable. Oh, yeah, the walls in the reactor hall are one and a half meters thick, and the cooling isn't a cooling tower, it's a building under a clear sky where water falls from above, gurgling, and is completely open on all sides.
    3. 0
      21 October 2025 20: 34
      Glagol1, THIS is very unreasonable... It is possible that they will "run", but it is highly likely that we will "run" along with them... A "failed generation" is always fraught with a host of problems that "easily" develop into a nuclear accident, which, as a rule, "lives" by its own laws and rules... If you are aware of what the "wind rose" of the Ukroreikh is, then I remind you that up to 40% of these winds are Belarusian-Russian compass (in the direction of Belarus - Russia)... Do you have any idea????????
  2. +1
    21 October 2025 03: 59
    The consequences of Russia's retaliatory actions in such a case must be understood not only in Kyiv, but also in the camp of its European and American "partners."
    Will this happen if your head is in a saucepan? what
  3. +4
    21 October 2025 05: 19
    As they say, this is something else... Are things really so bad at the front that they're even considering strikes on nuclear power plants? Such is greatness... If the information war hadn't been completely lost, they could have attacked and threatened. But this way, they'll add another label to the rogue state and another scare tactic for Europe. No one will agree to that... The masterminds behind all this could then cancel the guarantees, and someone will end up in The Hague. smile
    1. +1
      21 October 2025 06: 56
      Quote: Alexander_Makedonskov
      As they say, this is something else... Are things really so bad at the front that they're even considering strikes on nuclear power plants? Such is greatness... If the information war hadn't been completely lost, they could have attacked and threatened. But this way, they'll add another label to the rogue state and another scare tactic for Europe. No one will agree to that... The masterminds behind all this could then cancel the guarantees, and someone will end up in The Hague. smile

      They had to attack the Ukrainian nuclear power plant after the attack on the Voronezh nuclear power plant, so to speak, in retaliation, and no one would say anything, but for the thousandth time they suffered.
      1. 0
        21 October 2025 08: 44
        The impact of a single small drone on a huge cooling tower, without causing any significant damage, falls more into the category of "accidental hit" than "attack on the Voronezh Nuclear Power Plant," so no one would understand the move to retaliate against the nuclear power plant.
        and no one would say anything
    2. 0
      21 October 2025 07: 26
      Things aren't going well inside the country either. The economy is clearly struggling, and the attacks on the fuel complex are having an impact. Regarding this issue of nuclear power plants and nuclear weapons (from the local idiots), it's clear we can't move forward. We'll lose the support of countries we're critically dependent on, which even now are clearly not our allies.
      1. 0
        21 October 2025 12: 07
        "Strikes on nuclear power plants"... Doesn't it even occur to anyone that this "game" can be played "in pairs"? As the story of the oil refinery air defense system shows, let's just say "not everything is so clear-cut when it comes to UAV protection"... And then there's the nuclear power plant... winked
  4. The comment was deleted.
  5. +1
    21 October 2025 06: 43
    Why all these apocalyptic scenarios? First of all, to understand the level of utter recklessness with which the enemy is attempting to disrupt the operation of Russian nuclear power plants.

    Indeed, why stretch an owl onto a globe?
    From the very beginning of the Joint Military Operation, it was stated that it was necessary to destroy the terrorist state's infrastructure, deprive the Ukrainian Armed Forces of centralized control, clear out logistics centers, and determine strikes against the western regions and communications...
    Why are we saving conventional weapons? Where are Russia's tactical nuclear weapons capable of neutralizing the most important targets?
    There, without a nuclear power plant, there are enough treatment facilities, settling tanks, and substations... It's only in the movies that rebuilding a 110 kV substation is just a matter of getting your act together... In practice, it takes months of work, and not just work, but work without power...
    There are also port facilities, warehouses, elevators, water pumping stations, government quarters...
    We ran into these nuclear power plants - Chernobyl wasn't enough for us...
    When there's no heat, no water, and you're really hungry, there's no real desire to fight for someone else's "wants"...
    1. +2
      21 October 2025 08: 12
      Do we even have these conventional weapons? The strikes are carried out literally from the wheels, from factory supplies. At the beginning of the operation, the expenditure was quite high, but we must take into account that the Russian Air Defense Forces were also in operation at that time.
    2. 0
      21 October 2025 08: 48
      Why are we saving conventional weapons? Where are Russia's tactical nuclear weapons capable of neutralizing the most important targets?

      TNW are not conventional weapons.
      1. -4
        21 October 2025 08: 52
        Quote from solar
        TNW are not conventional weapons.

        Thank you in your hat, my dear and kind friend!
        There are two sentences, and between the phrase “conventional weapons” and “Russian tactical nuclear weapons” there is neither an equal sign nor a dash... recourse
        1. -1
          21 October 2025 08: 55
          Sorry, but these two sentences together read in such a way that it is implied that tactical nuclear weapons are conventional weapons.
          hi
          1. -1
            21 October 2025 08: 59
            Quote from solar
            Sorry, but these two sentences together read in such a way that it is implied that tactical nuclear weapons are conventional weapons.
            hi

            There are some pictures in which everyone sees what they want to see.
            stop And dirt is easily found by those who live in it all their lives...
    3. 0
      21 October 2025 11: 37
      Ross xnumx
      Today, 06: 43
      Why are we saving conventional weapons? Where are Russia's tactical nuclear weapons capable of neutralizing the most important targets?

      hi It's not yet time for the penultimate serious arguments.
      It is important to understand that, as in the past historical period, so in the future, this is our original Russian territory, which is best protected from infection.
      And the second warning: the wind rose is precisely westerly, meaning that with our own hands we will slowly contaminate the territories of Belgorod, Kursk, Voronezh, and further into Russian territory with radioactive waste, which is also unacceptable.
  6. +4
    21 October 2025 06: 44
    No, our management isn't taking such steps. Our partners will condemn us, and then we'll have to restore relations with them. Isn't that what they're hoping for? So, it's just a pipe dream.
  7. +1
    21 October 2025 06: 55
    And what's stopping us from responding in kind? Let them think about it.

    And what prevents us from responding in kind?

    I've been thinking about this for years and I can't find an answer!
    1. +1
      21 October 2025 08: 49
      Quote: Stas157
      I've been thinking about this for years and I can't find an answer!

      Think about it for too long and your head might explode... If the Ministry of Defense and its structures aren't shy about stealing millions, then what can we say about the others, lower-ranking but with the means...
      And only a disease can be mirrored in MO... when you can't see it by touch and without a mirror (and a magnifying glass)...
      What dark thoughts might come to a bright head while reading:
      "Apparently, the word 'pension' evokes this reaction in everyone": Irina Rodnina doesn't understand why her words have so angered the country...
  8. 0
    21 October 2025 07: 07
    And what prevents us from responding in kind?

    Slippery floor, tight trousers, tight shoes.
    1. +1
      21 October 2025 13: 35
      Quote: parusnik
      Slippery floor, tight trousers, tight shoes.


      Too subtle...or not to the taste of those who have a vague idea of ​​​​balls and the influence of their size on the dancer's body movements
  9. BAI
    -4
    21 October 2025 07: 09
    The immunity of enemy nuclear power plants is very conditional

    1. The main source of electricity generation in Ukraine (as well as in our country) is from thermal power plants (TPPs).
    2. According to unconfirmed information, the Ukrainians are storing weapons and ammunition at nuclear power plants, taking advantage of their immunity.
    1. +3
      21 October 2025 08: 37
      1. The main source of electricity generation in Ukraine (as well as in our country) is from thermal power plants (TPPs).

      You're mistaken: in Ukraine, nuclear power plants generate more than half of their electricity. They've long implemented extensive regulation of their nuclear power plants, which allows them to increase their share of overall electricity generation.
      1. BAI
        -2
        21 October 2025 09: 01
        At the end of 2016, the total installed electric capacity of power plants in Ukraine amounted to 56,170 MW, of which 34,180 MW (or 60,9%) were thermal power plants.
        1. -1
          21 October 2025 09: 29
          Installed capacity and electricity generation are completely different things.
          Installed capacity is the total rated capacity of all power units. However, this doesn't mean they are all used proportionally. Nuclear power plants are used primarily because they provide cheaper electricity (within technical capabilities, of course).
          For example, gas-oil units of thermal power plants were used very little.
          Here is the structure of electricity production for 2015 and 2016.
  10. 0
    21 October 2025 07: 39
    Technically, everything is correct, but, as they say, there is a nuance: those who live near the Ukrainian nuclear power plants have no influence whatsoever on attacks on our nuclear power plants, while for those who organize and attack our nuclear power plants, provoking a nuclear retaliation against "their own" is no less, if not more, a desirable goal than damaging or destroying ours.
  11. -1
    21 October 2025 08: 33
    The enemy destroyed the Dneprovskaya power line, which runs through Russian territory. In May of this year, the Ukrainian-controlled Ferrosplavnaya power line was similarly disrupted.

    The author somehow cleverly avoided the question: who interrupted the Ukrainian-controlled power line?
    This begs the classic question of Ludwig Aristarkhovich: “Who did this?”
    Unlike the balanced segment – ​​thermal power plants and hydroelectric power plants – the generating capacity of which can be easily varied over a wide range.

    The author likely isn't aware (or at least, he didn't mention it) that the Zaporizhzhia Thermal Power Plant is literally fenced in next to the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant, and powering the plant from there is a cinch. Why this hasn't been done in four years is a big question.
    In general, the Ukrainians' actions boil down to preventing the nuclear power plant from starting up (all reactors there are shut down), preventing the nuclear power plant from being connected to the Russian power grid, and ensuring the safety of the nuclear power plant using the power line on the Ukrainian side—it runs across the Dnieper.
  12. -4
    21 October 2025 08: 42
    This "recklessness" simply needs to be eliminated! Shut off the power to one of the Ukrop nuclear power plants... And, most importantly, stop talking! Because of all the unnecessary chatter, people no longer believe the warnings!
    1. -2
      21 October 2025 08: 53
      It won't work in reverse - there's a big difference between shutting off a line to an already operating station and to a non-operating one in order to prevent it from starting up.
  13. 0
    21 October 2025 09: 13
    Ukrainian nuclear power plants will never be targets of the Russian Armed Forces.
    It would be better if the Russian Federation stopped supplying its resources to the enemy during the war.
  14. 0
    21 October 2025 09: 14
    It's essential to act in a strictly mirror-image manner, that is, disconnect the operating reactors from the external power supply. This can be accomplished by cutting off the power lines and substations.

    That's not quite right... we need to "turn off" the 750 kV substations... there are only a dozen of them in the entire country, and the nuclear power plants themselves can be "with a flick of the wrist" switched to shutdown mode without any bombing of the facilities themselves or their life support systems :)
    1. 0
      21 October 2025 09: 35
      In Fukushima, this was precisely how it "easily transferred" due to the disconnection of power units from the substation. There's a big difference between disconnecting an already operating nuclear power plant from external power lines and disconnecting a non-operating nuclear power plant from those same lines.
      1. +1
        21 October 2025 09: 52
        Quote from solar
        "easily transferred" due to the disconnection of power units from the substation

        what substation?.. :)
        feeding the cooling system in your case...
        You didn't read carefully; the discussion was about a "discharge" substation, the "absence" of which immediately requires the reactor shutdown process to begin in a completely normal mode:
        without any bombing of the facilities themselves and their life support systems
        1. -1
          21 October 2025 09: 56
          the discussion was about a "discharge" substation, the "absence" of which immediately requires the process of shutting down the reactor

          This is exactly what happened in Fukushima, if you didn't know.
          requires that the reactor shutdown process be started in a completely normal mode

          But this didn't go as planned. And anyway, an emergency line shutdown is already an emergency operating mode for a nuclear power plant in any case.
          1. +1
            21 October 2025 10: 08
            Quote from solar
            things didn't go as planned

            It wasn't planned... I remember well asking myself why they didn't start shutting down the reactor immediately after the first tremors... They waited until the tsunami hit, seawater entered the station's systems, and the reactor cooling systems shut down.
            P.S. Shutting down a reactor is a well-regulated procedure, but the reasons for its use can vary...
            However, it is not my goal to analyze the "theory" of how nuclear power plants function; I only hinted that the "problem" can be dealt with much more safely and elegantly than the author of the article suggested, that's all :)
            1. -1
              21 October 2025 10: 20
              it wasn't planned...

              This is an automatic operating mode in the event of an abnormal line shutdown.
              Everything shut down even before the tremors, before the tsunami arrived.
              On March 11, 2011, at 2:46 PM local time, the main shock of the Great East Japan Earthquake occurred, with a magnitude of 9.0, with its epicenter located 180 km from the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant.[3] At the time, power units No. 1–3 were operating at nominal power, while power units No. 4–6 were shut down for refueling and maintenance. The earthquake caused the immediate automatic shutdown of the operating reactors. The destruction of high-voltage equipment and power transmission line supports caused by the earthquake led to the loss of external power supply to the plant.

              Shutting down a reactor is a well-regulated procedure

              And it’s not very fast; nuclear power units have a lot of inertia.
              Incidentally, an experiment was also conducted at Chernobyl on how to handle a reactor in the event of an emergency shutdown of an external power line. Something also went wrong.
              1. 0
                21 October 2025 11: 36
                Quote from solar
                resulted in the loss of external power supply to the station

                And where did you find this in my "proposal"? .. In the author's proposal it is: "cut off the power lines and feeding substations"
                :)
                I did advise you to read it carefully... well, "if you don't want to, then so be it" @enjoy your steam
                1. 0
                  21 October 2025 13: 12
                  I read carefully, but you yourself have a vague understanding of what you are writing about.
                  cut off power lines and supply substations

                  This is the same line - when the unit is under load, it transmits energy to the grid, when not, it transmits energy from the grid for the NPP's own needs, although different transformers may be used for this.
                  1. +1
                    21 October 2025 16: 19
                    Quote from solar
                    different transformers can be used for this

                    That's right... I was just talking about a very specific transformer and that's all I was talking about, and you've jumped into some Fukushima thing in the heat of the moment
                    :))
                    There are only 10-12 of them on FFS and FVS, and they don't make them like that abroad, by the way.
                  2. +1
                    21 October 2025 16: 47
                    Quote from solar
                    You yourself have a vague understanding of what you are writing about.
                    cut off power lines and supply substations

                    Are you sure you read it carefully? "Break the power line & co." - that was written by the author of the article, not me, and I disagreed with him (you probably didn't even read the article itself)...
                    however, it has already been said:
                    "If you don't want to, then do as you please"
      2. 0
        23 October 2025 08: 30
        This is how the Zaporizhzhya NPP worked and Ukrainians it was turned off during operation.
        On September 23, the Ukrainian Armed Forces struck a power line, causing the station to completely lose external power and switch to backup diesel generators. Experts warned at the time that if the generators failed, there would be a risk of a nuclear fuel meltdown, similar to the disaster at Japan's Fukushima-1. Six reactors were at risk, and each day without a stable power supply increased the likelihood of an accident.
        Respond completely mirrored at three nuclear power plants at once.
        1. 0
          23 October 2025 09: 33
          This is how the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant worked

          The quoted passage doesn't say that the station was operating and generating power. The station wasn't operating (even though it was loaded with fuel) and was using the external grid to power its own power. There are two such lines—one from the south, on our side, and one from the north, on the Ukrainian side. Both sides are trying to ensure that only one line remains.
  15. -1
    21 October 2025 10: 03
    Are you aware that despite the permanent power outage:
    1. So far, Rosatom, in accordance with its own instructions, has not unloaded either its own fuel (from 2 reactors) or the American fuel (from 4 reactors)?
    2. Rosatom still hasn't taken care of laying a normal power line to the Zaporizhzhya NPP?
    3. The head of Rosatom unconditionally follows the instructions of the Director of the Office of Nonproliferation Policy of the US Department of Energy, A. Ferkile, that the removal of nuclear fuel (not intended for normal nuclear power plants) is prohibited.
    4. At the moment, only through the Zaporizhzhya NPP energy sector can power be supplied, and the switch from two lines is in the hands of a bloody clown, who quite legitimately claims that Russia is not repairing the second wire.
    And after this, we need to cut the wires at other nuclear power plants?
    Before writing such articles, at least seek the expert opinion of Maxim Shingarkin.
    1. +1
      21 October 2025 10: 32
      You know

      I know
      1. So far, Rosatom, in accordance with its own instructions, has not unloaded either its own fuel (from 2 reactors) or the American fuel (from 4 reactors)?

      Unloading the fuel would completely turn the station into a suitcase without a handle—the maintenance costs are enormous, with no chance of generating revenue. But as long as the fuel is in the reactor, there's still a chance of getting the station up and running.
      2. Rosatom still hasn't taken care of laying a normal power line to the Zaporizhzhya NPP?

      There was such a line in Soviet times. Restoring it would be easy, as the two stations are right next to each other. But Rosatom isn't interested—after that, they could cut off all external lines on both our side and completely turn the nuclear power plant into a headache for Rosatom—a suitcase without a handle—zero revenue and high maintenance costs. Rosatom doesn't want that.
      4. At the moment, only through the energy sector can the Zaporizhzhya NPP be supplied with power.

      Ukraine is seeking to have the power plant supplied exclusively from the Ukrainian power grid. This would ensure safety but prevent the plant from being commissioned, and all the considerable costs of maintaining a non-operating plant would fall on Rosatom. Rosatom wants the opposite: no line from Ukraine, but only a line from the southern, Russian side. This would ensure both safety and power generation.
  16. 0
    21 October 2025 12: 36
    Or maybe it's simpler? There are plenty of targets there even without nuclear power plants. Even the nuclear power plants themselves, or rather their infrastructure, without which they're useless. But we don't attack them because we don't have anything special to use? And what's launched largely misses the mark? Just consider that nearly 1000 different launch vehicles are launched there every night, and we hear "all targets hit," so there probably shouldn't be anything left. I did a very rough count of the targets in my million-strong database, and I counted definitely less than 1000... In theory, there shouldn't be anything left there...
  17. 0
    21 October 2025 12: 45
    Could Ukraine's nuclear power plants become legitimate targets for the Russian Army?

    Not our methods, you understand. sad
  18. +1
    21 October 2025 12: 45
    Almost all major cities in the central and eastern parts of the country will be without power and heat—blackouts could last 12-15 hours daily. According to some estimates, up to 80 percent of the remaining territory of Ukraine will be plunged into darkness for the first few days.

    This is how NATO fights, our Leopold is no grandmaster.
    1. 0
      21 October 2025 12: 49
      Quote: Vladislav Markov_2
      This is how NATO fights, our Leopold is no grandmaster.

      Well, we're not fighting, we have a separate military unit, you see. laughing
  19. -1
    21 October 2025 15: 21
    IMHO, this is all black PR, to be honest.
    A lone drone here, a lone projectile there. Towards a huge nuclear power plant?
    For a long time, this has been explained by the work of electronic warfare and air defense, or by provocateurs.

    It seems, rather, that the population is being gradually accustomed to the possibility of a nuclear weapons strike on Ukraine or on its nuclear power plants.
    How many waves of PR were there about their dirty bomb and nuclear weapons? About 5-7 of them. In reality, it was a dud, nothing. The IAEA reported no signs. Reputable experts explained that it was all just PR bullshit.

    But here they are again throwing out an idea - let's hit their nuclear power plants... three of them. Carefully, so that the hands are white...

    They teach...
  20. +1
    22 October 2025 12: 43
    With the modern accuracy and range of Geraniums, why not?
    Well, fire back, put a fragmentation warhead in, and hit some office building. If they're so keen to fire at our nuclear power plants in 404, choose one closer to the West.
    What's wrong with that? Why should you be holier than the Pope?!
  21. 0
    22 October 2025 14: 02
    So now they're talking about crossing another red line and striking nuclear power plants. But what's needed at the start of the Second World War is to eliminate the junta's top brass with targeted strikes, not target empty facilities for humanitarian reasons.
  22. 0
    23 October 2025 09: 32
    Who would find it easier to strike a nuclear power plant? Ukrainian nuclear power plants are deep in the country. And the Zaporizhzhia plant is on the line of contact.
  23. -1
    6 November 2025 20: 50
    Quote: Alexander_Makedonskov
    someone will end up in The Hague

    It is unlikely!!!