Military Review

The analytical program "However," with Mikhail Leontyev 23 April 2013

39



Pointing to the Caucasian trail of a Boston terrorist attack, the Americans confirmed in a shocking way the forecast of Thierry Meyssan, an analyst and conspiracy theorist, who claimed that the Obama team was trying to turn around the American Middle East policy. Recall.

"The United States is going to make a" gift "for Russia, opening its way to the Middle East, and thus divert it from rapprochement with China," Thierry Meyssan said.

Nothing brings you together like having a common enemy. Acknowledged availability. What, in fact, we have been convincing Americans all this time. And in Iraq, and in Libya, and now in Syria. We showed this trail on the streets of the Syrian Deray. Surely convinced?

It is alleged that the behavior and attitudes of the eldest of Tsarnaev Tamerlane changed dramatically after his trip to Dagestan. That the Russian special services signaled to the Americans about his possible contacts with the Islamist underground, that the FBI conducted an inspection and, according to Tsarnaev’s mother, said that he was a “wonderful boy.” But they are “afraid for him” because, they say, he sometimes receives information from extremists.

Pancake! Well this is an indication of cooperation! And what else? Many analysts have pointed out and argued that the September 11 attacks occurred, at least, not without the knowledge of the American special services. And among them, by the way, one of the first is the same Thierry Meyssan. And the absence of terrorist attacks all these 11 years only confirm this, as well as the hypothetical ability of these special services to control the radical underground. Moreover, the aforementioned Tsarnaevs were not at least out of their sight.

“The telephone conversation that took place between Obama and Putin speaks about restarting anti-terrorist cooperation,” said Thierry Meyssan in his commentary from Damascus. “But this cooperation, like the implementation of the Kerry-Lavrov plan for Syria, comes up against resistance from both the anti-Syrian coalition, which is not ready to leave empty-handed, and the opposition in Congress. “Be that as it may,” says Meisan: “The terrorist attack in Boston is a staged action, the purpose of which is to draw attention to Chechen terrorism. How this terrorist act will be interpreted will predetermine the development of the situation in Syria.”

Nothing simpler: we are waiting for further interpretations. They all show.
Originator:
http://www.1tv.ru
39 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Alexander Romanov
    Alexander Romanov April 24 2013 10: 13
    13
    What, in fact, we have been convincing the Americans all this time. And in Iraq, and in Libya, and now in Syria. We showed this trail in the streets of Syrian Deraia. Really convinced ?!
    Something Leontyev drove on easy, whom we convinced there and what? The United States is increasing aid to Syrian terrorists and this is a fact.
    With regards to the production, it is clear why we needed the production later. It’s not worth talking about the fact that Russia and the United States will begin joint work on terror. This will not happen!
    1. alexng
      alexng April 24 2013 11: 21
      +4
      Is it that the US will fight by itself? Rave. After all, they themselves create and feed these terrorist organizations. And this terrorist act is the usual ridiculous hassle of the special services of apricots.
    2. ughhh
      ughhh April 24 2013 12: 17
      0
      Quote: Alexander Romanov
      It will not happen!

      Hmm, it looks like you own all the information. The smartest?
      1. Alexander Romanov
        Alexander Romanov April 24 2013 12: 48
        +1
        Quote: ughhh
        . The smartest?

        Yes not a fool tongue
      2. smart ass
        smart ass April 24 2013 14: 46
        0
        Wise guy is me)))))))))))))))) bully
        1. Garrin
          Garrin April 24 2013 14: 50
          0
          Quote: Clever man
          Wise guy is me))))))))))))))) bully

          Judging by the profile picture - WISE. lol repeat
    3. Skiff-2
      Skiff-2 April 24 2013 12: 27
      +4
      And the goals of the Boston props have already appeared - the voice of America and their other channels are screaming at full speed that the US government does not guarantee the safety of its athletes at the Winter Olympics in Sochi: "After all, the North Caucasus is a den of bandits killing policemen every day and it is so close to Sochi" The history of the Moscow Olympics is repeating itself - to disrupt a sports festival, to undermine the prestige of Russia.
      1. Waterfall
        Waterfall April 24 2013 12: 30
        16 th
        Sochi Olympics in a good way should be boycotted.
        1. Hudo
          Hudo April 24 2013 13: 54
          +7
          Quote: Wasserfall
          Sochi Olympics in a good way should be boycotted.


          Shaw, shard, FIZO did not pass? laughing Remember, sport is power, and the skull is a grave! laughing laughing laughing
        2. Sakhalininsk
          Sakhalininsk April 24 2013 15: 14
          +4
          Quote: Wasserfall
          Sochi Olympics in a good way should be boycotted.

          laughing oh how croaked laughing keep "-" deserved!
      2. Gluxar_
        Gluxar_ April 24 2013 17: 46
        0
        Quote: Skif-2
        And the goals of the Boston props have already appeared - the voice of America and their other channels are screaming at full speed that the US government does not guarantee the safety of its athletes at the Winter Olympics in Sochi: "After all, the North Caucasus is a den of bandits killing policemen every day and it is so close to Sochi" The history of the Moscow Olympics is repeating itself - to disrupt a sports festival, to undermine the prestige of Russia.

        Not quite a weary assumption, in the world redistribution something similar was voiced. To disrupt the Sochi Olympics, terrorist attacks are needed in Sochi itself, but not in the United States. The United States has tightened the screws in its country, is spending billions on protection from terror, curtailing the rights of citizens ... Americans are already at their limit and are already openly opposing such a policy. And now it turns out that there is no effect from such "victims", that Americans who are now imprisoned without trial, interrogated, wiretapped, banned cash more than $ 300, undressed at airports, deprived of labor and cut medical costs and much more ... and all this in vain. You can die during a regular race.
        This is the failure of the American under-ideology of the "fight against terror" that has replaced the "American dream and prosperity." And all this in order to prevent 1500 Americans from going to the Olympics in Sochi? Then I’m only for, there would be enough places for ourselves. The main income from the sale of TV broadcasts.
    4. wax
      wax April 24 2013 14: 33
      0
      It’s not worth talking about the fact that Russia and the United States will begin joint work on terror. This will not happen!

      I completely agree with you, for we have diametrically opposed views on terrorism: for amers, this is a way to rule the world, for us it is a criminal anti-human activity.
      1. Gluxar_
        Gluxar_ April 24 2013 17: 52
        0
        Quote: Wax
        I completely agree with you, for we have diametrically opposed views on terrorism: for amers, this is a way to rule the world, for us it is a criminal anti-human activity.

        You are wrong here. There are far more points of convergence between us and the United States than it seems. And do not forget that there are various forces in the United States, for some terror is a business, for others it is a problem. The only question is with whom to cooperate. And much has been written about how the United States supports "terrorists", but there is not a single material confirmation. As in other things, and in relation to Saudi Arabia. If the scale of "support" was really the same as they write, then sooner or later the CIA and the State Department would have gotten through and the facts would have come out. Such an information bomb would destroy any government in the White House.
  2. dc120mm
    dc120mm April 24 2013 10: 15
    12
    Yet the Amerikosi’s children would have gone to f.

    They finance terrorism themselves if it suits them.
    1. Canep
      Canep April 24 2013 11: 56
      +4
      Genatsvali is right. Only they themselves (Americans) are constantly financing terrorists.
      1. alexng
        alexng April 25 2013 00: 13
        0
        Quote: Canep
        Genatsvali is right. Only they themselves (Americans) are constantly financing terrorists.


        And they 'use' them for their own sake.
  3. valokordin
    valokordin April 24 2013 10: 17
    0
    Whatever Leontief the Telaviv applet says, Russia should double, triple its aid to the legitimate government of Syria. I do not think that the United States, which organized the Syrian rebellion, will change its policy. Only here is what ours will do with the Wahhabi wrecks after Assad’s victory.
    1. old rocket man
      old rocket man April 24 2013 10: 50
      +2
      Quote: ausguck
      Amers do not turn anywhere there,

      Of course, they do not turn anywhere, but a turn is still present, life itself has turned their face in the ass.
    2. Gluxar_
      Gluxar_ April 24 2013 17: 59
      +1
      Quote: valokordin
      Whatever Leontief the Telaviv applet says, Russia should double, triple its aid to the legitimate government of Syria. I do not think that the United States, which organized the Syrian rebellion, will change its policy. Only here is what ours will do with the Wahhabi wrecks after Assad’s victory.

      Assad's victory will be just when he will finish off all the "shortcomings". The potential of Wahhabis in recruiting is not as great as it is presented in the media. It is not for nothing that the "European" granaries of the Wahhabis are being emptied.
      Strange as it may seem, but it is beneficial for Russia to drag out the conflict in Syria, at least until the Iranian issue is resolved. The main thing is that the Russian Federation does not stop deliveries "according to previously accepted contracts," while Iran provides sufficient financial assistance. Venezuela also seems to be still in the ranks.
      Recruiting, assembling, equipping and training "jihadists" is not an easy task and requires large financial investments. In a modern economy, even the monarchs of the Persian Gulf, let alone Europe and the United States, cannot afford to spend a long time "nowhere".
  4. ausguck
    ausguck April 24 2013 10: 31
    +5
    I respect Leontiev, but I think this time he is wrong ... Amers do not turn anywhere there, he got into something here. And anyway, why did he decide that the amers decided to turn there somewhere? Under the influence of Meyssan fell?
    1. Egoza
      Egoza April 24 2013 10: 56
      +2
      Quote: ausguck
      And anyway, why did he decide that the amers decided to turn there somewhere?

      Right! Now it’s very convenient for Americans to WRITE any testimonies and ascribe them to a wounded terrorist. for the time being, he won’t know what they wrote there. So it will be seen where the United States is being turned.
      1. lubin
        lubin April 24 2013 11: 55
        +2
        In my opinion, this is yet another attempt by Amers to make a good face in a bad game, they are bluffing, they are trying to raise bets and drag Russia into the escalation of the conflict. then they will be to whom to blame everything. hi
        1. wax
          wax April 24 2013 14: 49
          0
          The arrest of the youngest.
          Where did the pictures from the reports go?
        2. Gluxar_
          Gluxar_ April 24 2013 18: 12
          0
          Quote: lubin
          In my opinion, this is yet another attempt by Amers to make a good face in a bad game, they are bluffing, they are trying to raise bets and drag Russia into the escalation of the conflict. then they will be to whom to blame everything.

          What an attempt? Draw in what? Where about this in the article? It is only about the resumption of contacts in the antiterrorist area. More in the article about nothing.
          As for Syria, the last words only say that the Russian Federation will be able to reach out to the brains of the West and show that terrorists are terrorists in Syria too. The Boston bombings are a cold shower for American society, which in recent years has played with "good and bad terrorists." So everything is on the surface, there is no need to think over here.
      2. wax
        wax April 24 2013 14: 46
        +1
        Moreover, the fearsome after the arrest were simply killed, and the younger one was shot in the throat.

        http://topwar.ru/27239-analiticheskaya-programma-odnako-s-mihailom-leontevym-23-

        aprelya-2013.html
        http://warfiles.ru/show-29581-smi-k-teraktam-tcarnaeva-gotovili-v-gruzii.html
        The arrest of the elder (naked in the center).
    2. wax
      wax April 24 2013 14: 37
      +1
      A long specialization in journalism in our time of a permanent race for news and sensations leads to a dull brain.
    3. Gluxar_
      Gluxar_ April 24 2013 18: 06
      0
      Quote: ausguck
      I respect Leontiev, but I think this time he is wrong ... Amers do not turn anywhere there, he got into something here. And anyway, why did he decide that the amers decided to turn there somewhere? Under the influence of Meyssan fell?

      I don’t understand where such conclusions from the article come from. I saw a completely different thing. The United States did not suddenly decide to become white and fluffy and turn somewhere there, as they were bloodthirsty exploiters, they remained so.
      The point is that the United States is losing strength and is not keeping up everywhere. They are afraid of a rapprochement between the Russian Federation and China, which is inevitable if Russia is cut off from the Middle East and Africa. Therefore, they are reducing their pressure against us in the Middle East (Libya, Algeria, Tunisia and Syria were still our partners and buyers) so that Russia does not rush into China's arms. That’s the whole point of the article.
      What is needed for this? Well, for example, reduce the heat after the "lists". The problem of terror is common for the Russian Federation and the United States and is an excellent platform for resuming dialogue, otherwise it is difficult to come to an agreement when you do not speak.
  5. fenix57
    fenix57 April 24 2013 10: 32
    +1
    Well, reboot again - now against terrorism, that is. and against the Syrian terrorists too! Hmm, Obama is providing them with help. Or the fight against "elected" terrorists ... or terrorists of your choice ... Whose? Who will choose and on what basis ... laughing
  6. matross
    matross April 24 2013 10: 39
    +5
    Some kind of staged action this terrorist attack. Chichi-youngsters only did not wave their hands to the surveillance cameras, warnings of the Russian special services, some cars with the number of terrorist # 1, during searches there were obvious traces of involvement, they could not take both alive, and the other could not speak. A murky picture looms. Bad organization of the production? As they said in one film: "They would never have found me if I had not left my passport at that safe!"
    1. BARKAS
      BARKAS April 24 2013 10: 54
      +3
      Everything according to the laws of the genre of Hollywood action movies is stupid but beautiful, spectacular! The American People.
      1. SASCHAmIXEEW
        SASCHAmIXEEW April 24 2013 11: 24
        +1
        And he was already in the MASS, already yelling - "Russian trace" and what rapprochement? Let the amers, troops from Afgan, by piece of iron through RUSSIA !? What other rapprochement
        1. Rustiger
          Rustiger April 24 2013 12: 02
          -3
          Quote: SASCHAmIXEEW
          already yelling - "Russian trace" and what rapprochement? Let the amers, troops from Afgan, by piece of iron through RUSSIA !?

          But this is most similar to the further development of the script.
          Put puzzles in your head.
          Nata's base in Simbirsk (the choice is next to the "Muslim" Volga region) - Withdrawal of troops (amerovsky, not NATO) from Afghanistan - "Boston performance" (already worked) - transfer through the base to Dagestan / Chechnya. ... ...
          Last year, the plans were confused by the "slight delay" in Syria and the resignation of Sukashvilli, and so the amers would have already been in the North Caucasus in all their glory.
          Don't you believe that the Judeoamers don't do anything for nothing, "right off the bat"?
          What will the "guarantor" say? ... ... ...
          1. matross
            matross April 24 2013 12: 21
            0
            Quote: Rustiger
            amers would have been in the North Caucasus

            American troops in Russia? Are you serious? belay Little victorious war? That brings you ...
            1. Rustiger
              Rustiger April 24 2013 12: 56
              +3
              Quote: matRoss
              American troops in Russia?

              About 25 years ago we would have giggled together on this topic - "American troops in Russia?"Hee hee hee, ha ha ha...
              Saddam chuckled so hard that he hung. ... ... Gaddafi was already torn with laughter over the fact that in his richest country in North Africa. some amers will cut resources. ... ... Milosevic smiled, Now Assad is "entertaining" us. ... ...
              Meanwhile, the terms of the agreement provide for 4500 US one-way flights. And the number of flights hired is not limited. By agreement, US military personnel can be transported through Russian airspace without an intermediate landing on our territory, that is, without any control. Aircraft carrying military cargo must make an intermediate landing. (I.e., the Russian side must take a word about the nature of transportation) Inspection of aircraft making an intermediate landing is not allowed. Document Reconciliation Only or a request to unload the cargo for inspection, in case of serious suspicion, from which the Americans have the right to refuse and return.
              Those. electronic reconnaissance aircraft no longer need to circle around Russian borders.
              The costs of air navigation services for US transit are borne by the Russian budget. The federal budget includes 190 million rubles for these purposes.
              In addition, NATO and Russia entered into an agreement on the ground transportation of non-military goods through Russian territory.
              "American troops in Russia?"- wa-ha-ha... You can piss as funny... But who will" bring "- we'll see a little later...
              1. Normal
                Normal April 24 2013 15: 26
                +1
                Quote: Rustiger
                American troops in Russia? "- wha-ha-ha... You can piss off as funny.

                Yes, Vadim. That is exactly how they joked about the "not base" on the site. Moreover, it was the noteworthy patriots who were ready to tear America apart in words. How not to remember the star of the site with the nicknames Met, Cavas, Tsoi is alive. I remember hysterical for the whole discussion: "Well, where is the base, hamster ?! Where? !!" A lot of fans and admirers were on the site of this subject. They are bored now without a leader ... Am I right, colleagues?
                1. matross
                  matross April 24 2013 15: 51
                  -1
                  Quote: Normal
                  patriots, ready in words to break America

                  Do you mean that you are already tearing it in practice?
                  Quote: Normal
                  Saddam chuckled so hard that he hung. ... ... Gaddafi was already torn with laughter over the fact that in his richest country in North Africa. some amers will cut resources. ... ... Milosevic smiled, Now Assad is "entertaining" us. ... ...

                  Were the listed characters leaders of countries comparable in military-political power to Russia?
                  Although, perhaps, I share some concerns with you. But it doesn’t look like an invasion scenario. IMHO
                  1. Normal
                    Normal April 24 2013 20: 37
                    +1
                    Quote: matRoss
                    Do you mean that you are already tearing it in practice?

                    You want to say that if we do not tear in fact, then we must break in words?
                    I am against "no base" in Ulyanovsk. I am opposed to the fact that in words we, proud and independent, oppose America, but in fact we cave in and cooperate with them, hiding behind allegedly "our interests"

                    Quote: Normal
                    Saddam giggled so much that he hung. .


                    The quote is not mine, but Rustaiger.

                    Quote: matRoss
                    Were the listed characters leaders of countries comparable in military-political power to Russia?


                    Well of course not. But the trend is not good, and our leadership began to stir only when the West put Gaddafi under the knife.
                    And before that, we were "friends" with the Berlusconians, gas contracts were pushed through, children and capital in the West were attached somehow without much concern for security and defense.
                    Quote: matRoss
                    But it doesn’t look like an invasion scenario.

                    Here I rather agree with you than with Rustaigar. But who knows, who knows ...
                    1. matross
                      matross April 25 2013 10: 08
                      0
                      Quote: Normal
                      The quote is not mine, but Rustaiger

                      Yes. It happens when you quote different people in one post. Glitch
                      Quote: Normal
                      You want to say that if we do not tear in fact, then we must break in words?

                      Not. But we can express an opinion. And even if this is the opinion - amers kozozl! - are not required to immediately run and coz pour them. So as not to be unfounded, so to speak.
                    2. Gluxar_
                      Gluxar_ April 25 2013 14: 04
                      0
                      Quote: Normal
                      You want to say that if we do not tear in deeds, then we must break in words? I am against "no base" in Ulyanovsk. I am opposed to the fact that in words we, proud and independent, oppose America, but in fact we cave in and cooperate with them, hiding behind allegedly "our interests"

                      What nonsense? You confuse the State with a capricious child who, in spite of his grandmother, freezes his ears. What is the limited position? If we have any flaws with another country, then you should not talk to it? Or resentment for the 90s? So do not forget who put the Americans to us and voted for EBN. Nobody is bending, moreover, the United States is bending in every way to the decisions of the Russian Federation in recent years and is forced to limit its actions depending on the position of Moscow, although they have real strength to do what they want. Do not be so radical in your judgments.
                      1. Normal
                        Normal April 28 2013 09: 12
                        0
                        Quote: Gluxar_
                        Do not be so radical in your judgments.


                        I may be radical in my opinions, but this is better than being naive in them:
                        Quote: Gluxar_
                        .
                        Nobody is bending, moreover, the USA is bending in every way to the decisions of the Russian Federation in recent years and are forced to limit its actions depending on the position of Moscow,

                        The United States in every way bends under the decisions of the Russian Federation. Oh how! It turns out we dictate our will to the world. wassat I would like to shout after Trekhvoltov: "Glory to Putin!"
              2. Gluxar_
                Gluxar_ April 24 2013 18: 25
                +1
                Quote: Rustiger
                that is, without any control. Aircraft carrying military cargo must make an intermediate landing. (I.e., the Russian side must take a word about the nature of transportation) Inspection of aircraft making an intermediate landing is not allowed.

                Show the text of the agreement. Show which office will transport and to whom it reports. What kind of gossip is that?
                If it is about Ulyanovsk, then no Americans will lead the process. They will only be a cargo, our office will draw up. and what we want and enlighten, what we need, then copy. Pay all be Americans, and this is another argument in favor of this agreement. AT
                Read not gossip, but real agreements, or at least listen to the people who are involved in these agreements.

                ps
                Here was an article by Shamanov. About the fact that the Airborne Forces are not able to conduct a full-fledged battle against ground units. And now we are getting in here that US special forces in the amount of 20 people with 3 containers of cargo will capture Russia. disgusted to read such vysery ...

                pp
                As for intelligence, it’s not at the borders, but across the territory of Russia, as indeed of the whole NATO, flights of observation aircraft are regularly conducted. This is a formal contract and has been implemented for the past decades.
    2. wax
      wax April 24 2013 14: 57
      0
      The eldest was asked (they say so - a cracker, there will be no victims), and the youngest did not know this. As a result, the eldest was killed, the younger did not say, was seriously injured. Bottom line - the world sympathize with America, Israel received carte blanche, the states can bomb terror nests anywhere in the world to the applause of Ban Ki-moon (including the bloodthirsty Assad and Ahmadinejad).
      1. Gluxar_
        Gluxar_ April 24 2013 18: 46
        -1
        Quote: Wax
        The eldest was asked (they say so - a cracker, there will be no victims), and the youngest did not know this. As a result, the eldest was killed, the younger did not say, was seriously injured. Bottom line - the world sympathize with America, Israel received carte blanche, the states can bomb terror nests anywhere in the world to the applause of Ban Ki-moon (including the bloodthirsty Assad and Ahmadinejad).

        What nonsense? I'm just surprised by today's audience, the last few weeks have been boring that there was nothing to even comment on. But today it’s just a breakthrough, it already looks like some kind of order.
        Where are such conclusions from. I do not want to offend the author of this comment, but please explain your position. With examples of where you got the information to draw such conclusions.

        To prevent me from being immediately bombarded here, I will describe my position regarding the Boston bombings, as it immediately occurred to me.
        At first I thought it was a cheap sensation, but we are talking about a domestic explosion. Too few casualties, the scale is "funny". When the details came out, the first thing that came to mind was that the Americans were crap. They spend billions, and some schoolchildren have surpassed them. The idea that this is 2001 and that there will be an invasion of "another Iraq" did not even arise. And when traces appeared either in Chechnya, or in Kyrgyzstan, the first thing that appeared in my head was that now the American society will think about who it supports and feeds. This is a geopolitical blunder of the State Department, when their "child" raises his hand against the "father."
        The attack in Boston, this is a failure of the United States. This is the failure of their concept of world order and their technology. And only a fool can plan some kind of foreign policy sabotage, striking at his prestige. This is just ridiculous.

        And there is no and cannot be any analogy with 2001. The US did not invade Iraq because someone had blown up a shopping center. Moreover, the UN then did not agree to this. The Americans attacked Iraq because they were strong and could do it. They did the same with Yugoslavia. In both of these cases, then there was only one superpower on planet Earth, and so it was taunting. tying this to the 9/11 attacks is ridiculous, although Western media propaganda is raising such associations among people. But look at the actual recordings of the UN discussion on the invasion of Iraq, all of this is unrelated. And in the end, it was precisely such mistakes that the United States was buried as a superpower, lowering it today to the level of China and Russia. And the fact that in Syria everything to the girlfriend is clear evidence of this, despite the fact that the NATO plane was destroyed by Assad. What was not in Libya or Iraq, before the invasion.
  7. Opera
    Opera April 24 2013 10: 52
    +1
    There is such an anecdote as Pinocchio Malvina called for a walk ...
    Here's the same with their "gifts and reboot!"
  8. grandfather
    grandfather April 24 2013 11: 41
    +1
    what do Americans have? the right hand with the left ceases to be friends.
    in squealing in foreign policy, and all from double standards.
  9. Standard Oil
    Standard Oil April 24 2013 11: 48
    +1
    It all started since the Cold War, when the Americans created al-Qaeda specifically against Soviet troops in Afghanistan and supplied them with the Chinese weapons to Afghanistan with the money of Arab sheikhs, and people who only know how to blow up houses and kill unarmed people will never peaceful tillers, so they rushed to Chechnya, where they once again received financial and material assistance from "sympathizing with the proud Caucasian people", but having received a piz in the Caucasus, these gentlemen dispersed in all directions, someone and in the United States rushed and apparently bored, they decided to blow up something, I personally have no doubt that many modern leaders of terrorists are associated with the CIA and other special services, but it is unlikely that all these terrorist attacks were carried out by the special services themselves, perhaps with their tacit consent, yes.
    Americans now need to hide all ends in the water because if any information about the cooperation of some people with the CIA and com is revealed, some people in the Pentagon and in the administration will lose their eggs and holva. This, by the way, confirms why the FBI did not respond to warnings from Russia regarding some people, just the Americans themselves knew perfectly well and did not touch the boys, by the way I won’t be surprised that the Americans themselves even prepared them for work in a distant cold northern country, in one of the regions where they would easily admit their own. tied so that forever not to unravel. hi
  10. albai
    albai April 24 2013 12: 48
    0
    Judging by the nature of the Boston explosion and after the eventual fuss of amers' specialists, the question arises "who benefits from this?" Essno amer, Schaub: to knock out grandmothers for anti-terror, stir up hysteria against Russia, such as a "terrorist nest", disrupt the peace initiatives of the fading kipish in Syria, reduce the supply of hydrocarbons to China, and fan the coals of fires in Central Asia in order to strengthen the presence of military bases there. After all, it’s just to leave Afgan… sap, thereby admitting defeat in the fight against the "enemies of crap." It just asks how long to go in the wake of the mattress policy. Is there really no asymmetric answer? Or just a fear of amers' big stick?
    1. Gluxar_
      Gluxar_ April 24 2013 19: 11
      0
      Quote: albai
      Judging by the nature of the Boston explosion and after the eventual fuss of amers' specialists, the question arises "who benefits from this?" Essno amer, Schaub: to knock out grandmothers for anti-terror, stir up hysteria against Russia, such as a "terrorist nest", disrupt the peace initiatives of the fading kipish in Syria, reduce the supply of hydrocarbons to China, and fan the coals of fires in Central Asia in order to strengthen the presence of military bases there. After all, it’s just to leave Afgan… sap, thereby admitting defeat in the fight against the "enemies of crap." It just asks how long to go in the wake of the mattress policy. Is there really no asymmetric answer? Or just a fear of amers' big stick?

      Yeah ... Everything becomes clear. A bunch of the same type of comments, driving into the heads of all polymers prosrali.

      1. knock grandmother on anti-terror - to knock anyone out? Americans are already bankrupt, they need to pour money into the real economy and industry, they spend everything on defense and anti-terror. The failure of the security services will ask more questions about where billions were spent on security that did not exist.
      2. fanning hysteria against Russia, such as "terrorists' nest" - ??? WTF is the most appropriate comment. All media outlets disseminated information about the US assistance from the Russian Federation in this matter. The question was raised that there are terrorists in the Northern Kwakaz, not freedom fighters. And if there are any claims to anyone, it is to London for harboring Chechen fighters of the 90s.
      3. to disrupt the peace initiatives of the fading kipish in Syria - what kind of negotiations? Can I have a reference? What nonsense. After the terrorist attacks, there is a rethinking of the Syrian events, and the West and the United States are no longer in such a hurry to help the "fighters". Today's news, quote "Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov and US Secretary of State John Kerry, following a meeting in Brussels, agreed to revive a peace plan for a settlement in Syria, Reuters reports." That is, it was only after the terrorist attack that the United States returned to a plan that could really save Syria. And not vice versa as some here write.
      4. reduce the supply of hydrocarbons to China - WTF2. And no less. I think the recipe for hodgepodge is all clear. All cliches in one vat.
      5. and inflate the embers of fires in Central Asia - and call on newcomers to Moscow so that the Russian savages do not eat their children.
      6. In order to strengthen the presence of military bases there - which bases? Locked Manas? Or Russian in Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan?
      7. It’s just to leave West from Afghanistan ... well, they’re generally dreaming of getting away from there, they just wouldn’t cheat on their face ...

      And again, where is that all? Leontiev said?

      ps In general, probably the last broad answer to vysery.
  11. Igor_kh
    Igor_kh April 24 2013 13: 02
    0
    http://earth-chronicles.ru/news/2013-04-21-42631
    perhaps staging
    1. wax
      wax April 24 2013 15: 13
      0
      Plus to this:
      Boston terrorist Tamerlan Tsarnaev, who was killed during a shootout on the MIT campus, studied at seminars held by the Georgian special services together with the Americans, the Izvestia newspaper writes.

      The publication refers to his documents of the counterintelligence department of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Georgia.
      According to the materials, the Georgian organization "Caucasus Fund", which cooperates with the American non-profit organization "Jamestown" (formerly one of the ideologues of US foreign policy, Zbigniew Brzezinski, was a member of the NGO board of directors), recruited residents of the North Caucasus to work in the interests of the United States and Georgia.
      The counterintelligence colonel of Tbilisi reports that in Chechnya the Georgian special services through the "Caucasian Fund" and "Jamestown" find people sympathetic to Georgia who are invited to various events in the republic under innocent pretexts. In these seminars, they are recruited and trained for terrorist attacks.
      The documents also mention the work of the "Caucasian Fund" in the three regions of Azerbaijan bordering on Dagestan - Belokan, Zagatala and Kakh.

      http://warfiles.ru/show-29581-smi-k-teraktam-tcarnaeva-gotovili-v-gruzii.html
  12. k220150
    k220150 April 24 2013 13: 22
    -3
    If in life you meet a poorly shaved subject, then you do not experience anything but disgust. G.Leontiev does not shave in principle! Conclusion?
    1. Hudo
      Hudo April 24 2013 14: 00
      0
      Quote: k220150
      If in life you meet a poorly shaved subject, then you do not experience anything but disgust. G.Leontiev does not shave in principle! Conclusion?


      No, of course, I, too, for keeping the face of a soldier clean. wink In the meantime, they didn’t call Leontiev, let him walk as he pleases, he’s a perfectly normal man, he’s not kissing anyone.
  13. pa_nik
    pa_nik April 24 2013 13: 56
    0
    There was no such thing that the amers did not take advantage of their actions (or declared intentions to act). They are muddying something again ... When they "turn" towards Russia, they will have to abandon the "demoralized" regimes around the world (and there - oil and gas - other minerals), then - curtail the current hostilities and return to their mainland. And what should I do upon my return !? Work..? Rebuilding production and the economy? Pay off trillions of debts by paying with corn and chicken ...? It is unlikely .. They will continue to fight and democratize. To our regret. hi
  14. Vtel
    Vtel April 24 2013 14: 34
    0
    "The US is going to make a" gift "to Russia by opening the way to the Middle East, and thus distract from rapprochement with China," Meyssan said. Nothing brings you closer than having a common enemy.


    Well, what can give the Yankees - horns and hooves, you can’t expect good.
    They do not like our friendship with China - well, to be friends with you is 30 times more expensive. And about the common enemy - they hint at something.
  15. maestro123
    maestro123 April 24 2013 14: 37
    0
    US intelligence agencies began to poorly perform performances, and the naive audience only stayed there.
  16. tomket
    tomket April 24 2013 14: 57
    0
    In general, in principle, the way it is, only the blind man does not see how America has turned its gaze to the Chinese border, under the pretext of North Korea. Further, America all this time regularly played along with Israel’s policy in the Middle East, and now we see how Kerry is trying to direct Israel’s gaze to Iran, you see, let's work there in the long run while we are busy, and Syria will most likely be left alone if Of course, France will not have bouts of belligerence, and it has recently begun to fall into insanity, well, or Israel did not decide to destroy the Syrian army, perhaps by the hands of the same British and French.
  17. Butchcassidy
    Butchcassidy April 25 2013 00: 45
    0
    so-called "international terrorism" appeared when Azerbaijan began to attract mercenaries from Afghanistan, who were left out of business after the withdrawal of Soviet troops from there, to destroy the Armenian population of Artsakh (Nagorno-Karabakh). There Shamil Basayev and others like them gained experience.

    This was the first "overseas mission" of the CIA fosterling, which had not been international before, but was local and served only one purpose - to resist the USSR.

    If we want the world to become cleaner and fairer, and not be afraid of the CIA-shny chimera of "international terrorism", everyone should simply abandon the dollar.