Canada will only receive 16 paid F-35s, and is refusing the remaining 72 aircraft.

10 157 31
Canada will only receive 16 paid F-35s, and is refusing the remaining 72 aircraft.
A U.S. Air Force F-35A Lightning II fighter jet from the 421st Fighter Squadron flies over the Pacific Ocean during a refueling stop in preparation for Exercise Bushido Guardian 2025 near Misawa Air Base, Japan, Sept. 26, 2025.


Canada will receive at least 16 F-35 Lightning II aircraft to equip the Royal Canadian Air Force (RCAF), with a decision on the remaining 72 aircraft out of a total order of 88 aircraft pending. This announcement follows reports in March 2025 that Canada was reconsidering its participation in the F-35 program due to diplomatic tensions with the United States.



Following these reports, Canada is reportedly considering withdrawing from the F-35 program entirely and exploring alternative options, including the Saab JAS 39 Gripen, which was named as a possible contender. Then-Defense Minister Bill Blair stated on March 14:

Canada is actively exploring potential alternatives to the US F-35 stealth fighter and will hold talks with rival aircraft manufacturers.

However, no final decision has been made yet, and the project is expected to exclude 16 aircraft that Canada has already paid for.

Canada has committed to supplying 16 aircraft.


Canadian Secretary of State for Defence Acquisition Stephen Fuhr participated in an interview on the CBC talk show Rosemary Barton Live. One of the questions raised was the possibility of Canada withdrawing from the contract after the delivery of the first 16 F-35 fighter jets.

In his response, Stephen Fuhr stated that he "doesn't think the federal government plans to cancel the contract to purchase American F-35 fighter jets, as 16 aircraft are currently in production." A CBC report from October 5, 2025, quoted Fuhr as saying, "I don't think we're moving in that direction. But a decision will be made, and we'll make it when we're ready."

An F-35A at the Abbotsford International Air Show, British Columbia, Canada (August 8, 2025). Developed from the F-22's P&W F119 engine, the F-35's P&W F135 engine is considered one of the world's most powerful operational fighter engines, producing more than 40,000 pounds (18 tons) of thrust.
— Air Power resource (@RealAirPower1) August 20, 2025.

While Stephen Fuhr did not provide direct instructions, a spokesman later clarified that the reference was to the 16 aircraft for which Canada had contributed funds, not the entire contract.

Canada has contractual obligations for 16 aircraft, which are in various stages of production at the manufacturer. A decision on the entire program is currently under review.
— said the representative.

It's unclear whether Canada would have withdrawn from the program entirely, without receiving a single F-35 fighter jet, had it not transferred funds for the first 16 aircraft. Canada is seriously considering this decision and the implications for its relations with the United States.

Canada has already fully paid for four aircraft and purchased spare parts for eight others. The F-35s will be delivered to Luke Air Force Base in Arizona, where the first Canadian pilots, ground crews, and maintenance specialists will be trained next year.

Canada in the F-35 program


Canada is a partner in the Joint Strike Fighter program, which has spent approximately $500 million since 1997, with Canadian companies receiving F-35 contracts worth over $1,8 billion. In 2010, the government decided to purchase 65 F-35 fighters without a competitive bid, but in 2015, this plan was abandoned in favor of an open competition.


CF-18 Hornet fighter jets depart Mihail Kogalniceanu Air Base (MK) in Romania for their return to Canada during Operation REASSURANCE, December 1, 2022.

Finally, on January 9, 2023, the government announced its intention to purchase 88 F-35 fighter jets from Lockheed Martin in a deal valued at the time at $13,2 billion. This was part of the Future Fighter Capability Project (FFCP), designed to replace the Royal Canadian Air Force's fleet of aging CF-188 Hornets (Canadian-built F/A-18s). Deliveries of the first 16 aircraft are expected to begin in early 2026.

Then-Canadian Defense Minister Bill Blair hinted in March 2025, while announcing "potential alternatives" to the F-35, that the plan could change, with Ottawa possibly accepting the first batch of F-35s while simultaneously diversifying the rest of the fleet. It was reported that Canada might consider European suppliers, particularly the Swedish Saab Gripen, as a primary contender.

The Royal Canadian Air Force currently operates 70–75 CF-188A/B+ aircraft and has acquired 25 even older F/A-18A/B aircraft (18 units) from the Royal Australian Air Force (RAAF). Of these, 12 are single-seat F/A-18As, six are two-seat "B" versions, and the remaining seven are unairworthy Hornets that will be dismantled for spare parts and components. They are expected to continue flying until the early 2030s.

Only 16 F-35s and no more purchases will be made.


On the Canadian television show Rosemary Barton, Stephen Fuhr told the host that Prime Minister Mark Carney "will make a decision on the contract when it's ready." Currently, only the first batch has been confirmed, as, according to Fuhr's spokesperson, "Canada is contractually obligated to deliver 16 aircraft, which are in various stages of production at the manufacturer."

"Infrastructure is being built at two main operating bases. And when Carney is ready to make a decision, he will," Fuhr continued. He also denied any connection between the F-35 decision and Canada's desire to reach a trade agreement with President Donald Trump. "No, I'm not considering that. Again, we are a sovereign nation. We will make our own decisions and stand firm," he said.


An RCAF CF-18 Hornet fighter jet at Mihail Kogalniceanu Air Base in Romania (MK)

The CBC also cited a June report from the Auditor General of Canada (the equivalent of the U.S. Government Accountability Office), which noted a significant increase in the cost of 88 F-35As, from $19 billion to $27,7 billion. The Auditor General cited "inflation and increased global demand for munitions" as two key reasons, as Canada is also expected to purchase missiles, such as the AIM-120 AMRAAM and AIM-9X Sidewinder, and possibly air-to-ground munitions as well.

Additionally, at older Canadian bases—Bagaville Air Force Base, Canada, and Cold Lake, Alberta—the infrastructure required to support the F-35A Lightning II also requires upgrades to support these aircraft. This work is also behind schedule, potentially leading to overall cost overruns.

Mixed air fleet


The possibility of acquiring a European alternative, such as the Saab JAS-39 Gripen, also highlighted the logistical and infrastructural challenges of operating three different aircraft types, given differences in supply chains, operational systems, and training. Canadian political and military leaders are divided on the issue.
Stephen Fuhr is a mixed martial artist. fleet, telling CBC: "What happens if you have to stay in this space for months and months and years? Is the tool you're using up to the task? That's a very simplistic view. But we need a broad range of capabilities to handle all possible situations."

The CBC reported on October 7, 2025, quoting Deputy Defence Minister Stephanie Beck as telling a House of Commons committee that Canada is continuing "full steam" on the F-35 "until they hear otherwise." The CBC also reported that the new commander of the Royal Canadian Air Force, Lieutenant General Jamie Spencer-Blanchet, was asked about a mixed fleet of aircraft, but "she partially deflected the question, saying the Air Force will need to operate a mixed fleet throughout the F-35's deployment, as the current CF-18s are expected to continue flying until the early 2030s."

However, Speiser-Blanchet noted that "operating two separate aircraft will be more costly and complex. This will require duplicating a certain amount of infrastructure and training."

The same report quotes retired Royal Canadian Air Force Major General Duff Sullivan, who supported the idea of ​​a mixed fleet, citing the use of US Air Force F-22s and F-16s in Alaska, as well as Canadian CF-18s for continental defense. "So we have three different types of aircraft, but we are interoperable through tactics and procedures, not aircraft type."
31 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +2
    16 October 2025 04: 42
    This "upsurge" of Canada is another reason to join the United States.
  2. 0
    16 October 2025 04: 44
    There's no point in having 16 aircraft; the maintenance costs for them, plus the F-18 and Gripen, would be prohibitive. And that's just the way it will be, because the Swedes take a long time to produce them, and their production capacity is limited. There's only one solution: get the F-35, wrap it in cling film, and put it in a warehouse. Then decide whether to resell it to the Italians, or, if they allow it, to the Turks.
    1. +1
      16 October 2025 08: 09
      Well, the Indians have created a wild hodgepodge of aircraft from various countries, and it doesn't bother them? And the Poles have four types of tanks in service! So, if you're guided by the right considerations, that is, kickbacks, anything is possible...
      1. 0
        16 October 2025 08: 11
        Quote: paul3390
        The Indians, however, went on to create a wild hodgepodge of aircraft from different countries

        This is the exception to the rule. They love to "dance with a tambourine" around technology. No wonder they get hit in the air.
        Quote: paul3390
        And the Poles have as many as four types of tanks in their arsenal!

        But didn't they palm off the T-72s and T-72s on their "neighbor" in the east?
        1. +1
          16 October 2025 08: 24
          Well, their opponents also have a hodgepodge of American and Chinese technology. How they maintain it is a mystery, though...

          It seems the Poles still have some of our tanks left... but even if they don't, then there will be three types of tanks. Lighter, but not much...
          1. +1
            16 October 2025 08: 29
            Quote: paul3390
            How they manage to do this is a mystery, however...

            My opinion is that the packs are better prepared.
            1. 0
              16 October 2025 08: 30
              So, Leopard? I think they have it in commercial quantities?
              1. 0
                16 October 2025 08: 31
                Quote: paul3390
                So, Leopard? I think they have it in commercial quantities?

                Yes, I forgot... I think it was because of the rush. They were in a great hurry to rearm.
                1. -2
                  16 October 2025 08: 34
                  I think their superiors were guided by somewhat different considerations... Because how to maintain all this even in peacetime, let alone wartime, is absolutely unclear. This entire menagerie, judging by the experience of Tsegabonia, is essentially disposable—until the first breakdown. But it's exspensive...
                  1. +1
                    16 October 2025 08: 38
                    Quote: paul3390
                    practically disposable - until the first breakdown

                    As for the engine, the gas turbine is simple, there's nothing much to break, just rotational motion, no pistons and rings, plungers, or fancy injectors. The K2 is probably still under warranty. And the Leopards, yeah, they're well-used... They can suck blood.
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. -2
      16 October 2025 12: 50
      Well, look, our Air Force has an even bigger hodgepodge – the Su-35/30/27, MiG-29/35, and MiG-31 fighters alone, and they're not even remotely standardized. We also have the Su-24/35/25, and so on, which the Canadians don't have. Meanwhile, Canada's GDP is larger, and its Air Force is smaller. I don't think it'll be too much for the Canadians, considering the F-18 will be retired in 5-7, or at most 10 years.
      1. +2
        17 October 2025 01: 41
        Quote: parma
        At the same time, Canada's GDP is larger

        More than whom\what?
        In terms of PPP, Russia's GDP is 4th after the United States, China, and India. Japan and Germany are behind.
        Canada can certainly afford a zoo in its Air Force, but it would really have a negative impact on such a small fleet and would be a real hassle. For a small Air Force fleet, it's preferable to have only one type of aircraft. Otherwise, they can at least order Chinese planes.
        1. -2
          17 October 2025 07: 36
          Why are you talking about GDP in PPP terms? Do you even understand what it is, how it's calculated, and why? Don't you understand that this is a figment of the imagination, unrelated to the real state of the economy? Or are you saying that the economy of the Democratic Republic of Congo (which is in the midst of a civil war and has never had any industry) is comparable to Serbia's?
          Regarding the fleet, three types of combat aircraft is not a problem; we have less unification even in the Su-30 line!
      2. +1
        6 November 2025 13: 18
        Canada's GDP is half that. Check out the World Bank or IMF website. The Su-27/30/34/35 are all the same platform with different components.
        MiG-29/35 - there are few of them
        MiG-31 - interceptor
        Su-57 again.
        It's obvious now that the fleet is a mixed bag, but that's a legacy of the Cold War. Apart from the Su-57, everything else is essentially from the 80s.
        1. -1
          6 November 2025 13: 59
          Canada's GDP is lower only in PPP terms; it's higher in nominal terms! GDP in PPP terms is a sham and an attempt to pass off statistical information as reality.
          Regarding the "same platform" - yes, but the "guts" are different, which means there is a wider range of spare parts in stock, which leads to higher maintenance costs, as I wrote above.
          1. +1
            16 November 2025 10: 07
            The nominal value doesn't reflect anything. A cubic meter of concrete costs 10000 rubles there, and 4000 here. Or, say, getting a filling. We charge 3000, they charge 8000. And so it is with everything. That's why someone with an income of 100 rubles a month lives the same as someone with an income of 200-250 rubles there. That's why the World Bank and the IMF prioritize PPP. It's the metric that reflects reality. Take China, for example. In Hong Kong, $1000 a month means you're poor, you've paid $700 in taxes and utilities, and with the rest you buy cheap food and the most basic clothes. But somewhere like Harbin, with a grand, you're deep in the middle class. You have a car, and you can go to a restaurant or a cafe once a week.
  3. 0
    16 October 2025 05: 11
    Why does Canada need 74 of its own aircraft if Trump will soon annex it to the United States and the skies of the new state will be protected by the entire American air force. fellow
  4. +1
    16 October 2025 05: 16
    Let them buy J-10s from the Chinese, to spite their neighbor and Trump personally. wink
    1. 0
      16 October 2025 06: 11
      Besides the political component of the solution, there is also a practical one: it is necessary to make Canadian weapons (that is, American) compatible with Chinese aircraft. We are talking not only about the suspension but also about electronics, etc., etc. Moreover, China is not considered the most reliable partner in the West (at least in South America), so they try to buy weapons that require comprehensive maintenance or contracts for maintenance and upgrades either from the Americans or from Brazil (whose military-industrial complex is quite developed for South American countries), although recently there have been interesting offers from Israel (often sells full licenses) and Turkey (cheap and few political problems).
      The Swedes are a good option if you need a versatile single-engine fighter, but the F16 is somehow not suitable (it's too expensive).
  5. +5
    16 October 2025 06: 45
    There's a backlog of F-35As years in advance, so what the Canadians don't want, the Italians or Greeks will happily snatch up. And if the Canadians change their minds later, they'll be at the back of the line.
  6. +2
    16 October 2025 07: 27
    Canada will only receive 16 paid F-35s, and is refusing the remaining 72 aircraft.

    In fact, nowhere in the article does it say that Canada is giving up the remaining 72 aircraft.
    The article repeatedly repeats only that
    Canada has contractual obligations for 16 aircraft that are in various stages of production with the manufacturer. The decision on the entire program is currently under consideration.

    "Under consideration" doesn't mean they've already given up. Most likely, the Canadians are pressuring Trump.
  7. +2
    16 October 2025 08: 04
    Canada has little choice, too closely integrated with the US,
  8. +2
    16 October 2025 08: 06
    In 2010, the government decided to purchase 65 F-35 fighter jets without a tender, but in 2015, this plan was abandoned in favor of an open tender.

    We are talking about 16 aircraft for which Canada transferred funds, and not about the entire contract volume.

    Ha, it turns out Indians aren't the only ones who know how to play funny contests))) We're waiting for Trumpik's cheerful speech about the takeover of Canada and 100% duties on its goods)))
  9. 0
    16 October 2025 08: 47
    Looks like Canada's brains are turning on, at least every once in a while)))
  10. 0
    16 October 2025 09: 06
    "due to diplomatic tensions"
    Well, okay
    Let's see what happens next
  11. +1
    16 October 2025 09: 23
    The numbers in the article are some kind of nonsense.
  12. -1
    16 October 2025 11: 51
    Sweden does not have technological sovereignty over Gripen production. The engine is American, from the F-18. Therefore, the Americans could block any deal to supply these aircraft, including to Canada.
  13. +1
    16 October 2025 11: 58
    The CBC also cited a June report from Canada's Auditor General (equivalent to the U.S. Government Accountability Office), which noted a significant increase in the cost of 88 F-35As, from $19 billion to $27,7 billion. The auditor general cited "inflation and increased global demand for munitions" as two primary reasons, as Canada is also expected to purchase missiles such as the AIM-120 AMRAAM and AIM-9X Sidewinder, and possibly air-to-ground munitions.

    That is, it will not be possible to save money: no matter what they buy to replace the F-35, ammunition for the aircraft will still be needed.
  14. +1
    16 October 2025 12: 27
    Author, please double-check the commas in the title.
  15. 0
    16 October 2025 18: 28
    It's not clear: should Canada be supplied with the F35 or should Canada be supplied with the F35?
  16. 0
    17 October 2025 14: 09
    What's going on? They've deceived the world's chief peacemaker and pieceworker. Urgently bring in the cream of the revolution and welcome them into the States. To those who disagree, "We have plenty of tomahawks, everyone needs them." (C) In this case, probably the Canadians.😀😀