Military Review

The myth of the irreproachable knight of the revolution Trotsky

54
The myth of the irreproachable knight of the revolution Trotsky For a certain part of the Western and Russian intelligentsia, including its left-wing radical, Lev Davidovich Trotsky-Bronstein (1879 - 1940) is still an idol, an ideal. He is portrayed as a genuine revolutionary and a social democrat, who is almost the first to fight the dictatorial manners of Stalin and the Soviet bureaucracy, which in the future will lead the USSR to "stagnation." Here is one of many examples of the ideal image of Trotsky from the mouth of the American journalist and writer Christopher Hitchens: "It was a revolutionary romantic, a wise and completely harmless old man with an impeccably clean reputation."


Such respect for the figure of Trotsky and his mythologization, glorification was characteristic of the Western public from the moment when, in 1929, this fiery revolutionary was expelled from the USSR. In 1936, Trotsky was met with great respect in Mexico; President Lazaro Cardenas even sent him a special train. Trotsky was housed in the villa by artists Frida Kahlo and Diego Rivera. There he worked on the book "Devoted Revolution". In it, he "denounced" Stalin, who was accused of Bonapartism and called what is happening in the USSR "Stalinist Thermidor" (the Thermidorian coup of 1794 of the year in France led to the overthrow of the Jacobin dictatorship and the establishment of the Directory). Trotsky portrayed himself as a disinterested soldier of the revolution, who, occupying the highest posts in Soviet Russia, had no benefit from it.

It is clear that the Western press picked up these ideas and began to promote the "bright image" of Trotsky. Stalin became the "perverter" of the bright heritage of Lenin and Trotsky. Later, Khrushchev, the ideological heir to Trotsky, will do the same. At the same time, the Western media will “forget” that during the Civil War in Russia they called Trotsky “the heir of the Jacobins” and “the creator of revolutionary terror”. In 1937, Time magazine called Trotsky “the knight of European democracy.”

For the “Trotskyists”, Trotsky became an idol. In 1938, Trotsky and his supporters created the Fourth International in France, which was based on the theoretical legacy of Leon Trotsky and was considered an alternative to Stalinism. The Fourth International set itself the task of implementing the world revolution.

Indeed, Trotsky is one of the main figures of the October Revolution, the Civil War, Lenin’s closest ally, one of the “fathers” of the founders of the Soviet Union, who was chosen to become the leader of Soviet Russia. However, if you look closely at Trotsky more attentively, it will become obvious that even at this cruel time it is difficult to find a more bloody and cynical figure than Trotsky. He was ready to go, and he was already walking, over thousands of corpses, for the sake of achieving the "bright" goal of the world revolution (building a "new world order").

Youth and the beginning of the revolutionary activities

The beginning of Trotsky’s revolutionary path was typical of many revolutionary-minded young people at the beginning of the 20 century. Leiba Bronstein was the son of a wealthy landowner and grain trader of the Kherson province. Mother was from a family of large entrepreneurs Zhivotovsky. With 7 years, the boy studied at the synagogue, then at the school in Odessa. While studying at a real school, the young man lived in the family of his maternal relative, the owner of the printing house and publisher of Moses Shpenzer and his wife Fanny Solomonovna, the headmistress of the Jewish girl school. Bronstein graduated from the seventh grade of the school in Nikolaev, then entered the Odessa University in the Faculty of Mathematics. While still a student at Leiba School, he became interested in politics, as a result he soon abandoned the university and became actively involved in the activities of the South Russian Workers Union. True, there were almost no workers in this “workers'” union, the majority were from well-to-do families. In January, 1898 was first arrested.

Bronstein himself hurt his youthful maximalism - trying to "let the fog", impersonate a more important bird, changed testimony. As a result, the investigation was delayed - he was transferred from Nikolaev to Kherson, he spent another year and a half in Odessa prison, only in 1900 was the sentence passed - 4 was exiled. At the same time, Trotsky married Alexander Sokolovskaya, who was one of the leaders of the Union, 7 years older than him. In Siberia, left husband and wife. We lived in Ust-Kut, then in Verkholensk. They had two daughters. Bronstein worked as a clerk at a local merchant. I tried myself in the literary activity, while still in prison I wrote a treatise on stories freemasonry. In Siberia, a number of his articles published "Eastern Review". He was "noticed," on the recommendation of G. M. Krzhizhanovsky, who gave him the nickname "Feather", became an employee of Iskra. And in 1902, they organized an escape abroad. According to Trotsky, he wrote down the name Trotsky in the false passport “at random”, after the warden of the Odessa prison (Trotsky L. D. My Life. M., 2001.). Apparently this is a lie, Trotsky loved to throw dust in his eyes, he hid some facts of his biography, others stuck out, embellished. Leibe got the passport of a retired colonel Nikolai Trotsky, who died in Yekaterinoslavl (there was a centralized system for supplying passports to opponents of the regime). He left his wife and young children in Siberia without hesitation. They parted forever, Trotsky's first family was no longer interested. Daughters will be brought up by parents of Bronstein-Trotsky.

Bronstein's escape was well organized. He traveled to Irkutsk without interference, here from someone he received good clothes, money, a ticket and documents. The path was prepared in advance. Leiba drove to Samara, where the Iskra headquarters was located, here Krzhizhanovsky gave him a further route, turnouts and money. In Ukraine, in the area of ​​Kamenets-Podolsk, they were already waiting for him and prepared a “window” at the border. On the territory of Austria-Hungary, he was also waited, provided with everything he needed and put on a train. In Vienna, Trotsky went straight to Viktor Adler, who was a “shadow” personnel officer of the socialist international. A prominent Austrian politician greeted Trotsky cordially, spoke with him and, apparently, was pleased. Bronstein was considered a worthy figure of attention and advancement.

In the emigration

Trotsky was again provided with currency, documents and sent to London, to Lenin. Trotsky was well received there. Initially, Trotsky became friends with Lenin. Trotsky was even called the “Leninist club”, because in political debates he defended the Leninist position and theses more than their author himself. Trotsky became an active employee of Iskra, Lenin even wanted to introduce him to the editorial board, but Plekhanov, who did not want to strengthen his opponent’s position, opposed it. Lev Davidovich was sent to various cities. In Paris, he met the “progressive” daughter of the Russian merchant Natalya Sedova, who criticized Orthodoxy at the Kharkov Institute of Noble Maidens, for which she was expelled. Father sent his daughter to continue education at the Sorbonne. In 1903, she became Trotsky's second wife, although illegal, since Trotsky was not divorced from A. L. Sokolovskaya and the marriage to Sedova was not registered.

In the 1903 year, after the collapse of the RSDLP into “Bolsheviks” and “Mensheviks,” Trotsky unexpectedly joined the Mensheviks. His self-esteem grew, Trotsky spoke out against tough party discipline, did not want to obey anyone. In addition, Lenin did not introduce him to the new editorial board of the Spawn, and Trotsky considered himself worthy of this position. Trotsky, like Lenin, used the same methods in disputes, turning to personalities, so they quarreled and turned from comrades into enemies. True, Trotsky did not last long with the Mensheviks. They diverged, a formal pretext was the debate about the role of the liberal bourgeoisie. The main reason was the growth of Trotsky's ambitions. He no longer wanted to follow any flow. I saw myself as an independent politician.

For a political émigré, such a hostility could turn out badly. The very existence of the majority of revolutionaries abroad was provided through an organization that provided them with money, work. However, Trotsky clearly "led". He receives an invitation from Alexander Parvus. My wife and I are going to Munich and meet the most cordial welcome. They are settled in the mansion Parvus, Trotsky lives at the ready. Lev Davidovich clearly liked the owner. Parvus (Israel Lazarevich Gelfand) was a very interesting figure. Born near Minsk, but the family moved to Odessa. Israel graduated from high school, became a revolutionary and emigrated. Abroad, he not only engaged in revolutionary activities and studied, but also noted as a successful entrepreneur, he made a decent fortune. To succeed, he joined the ranks of the Freemasons (Illuminati), had contacts with the special services of Germany and England. Parvus formed a new revolutionary center in Germany (the other was in Switzerland). He was one of the first to introduce Lenin there.

Parvus conducted Trotsky's "special" training, capturing him with the theory of "permanent revolution." In 1905, Trotsky and Parvus are going to Russia. They go to Vienna to Adler, receive documents and money from him, change clothes and try to change their appearance. It was a regular spy operation. So Trotsky embarked on the path of active struggle against Russian statehood. The special services of the Austro-Hungarian Empire at that time actively played the “Ukrainian card”. Galicia then belonged to Vienna and Catholicism, Uniatism were actively implanted in it, the local intelligentsia was “Germanized”. In Russia, Vienna cultivated and supported Ukrainian nationalists, kept under control the “national” movements of socialists and liberals in Little Russia. Parvus, Trotsky and his wife were transferred to Russia through these channels.

1905 — 1907 revolution

In Kiev, Trotsky panicked, it seemed to him that he was "under the hood" and he "lay down on the bottom" (became "sick" in a private clinic). But here he was taken under the care of L. Krasin, who held a high position in the German firm "Simmens-Schukkert" and had good contacts in Germany. During the 1905 revolution of the year, Krasin was supplying weapons for combat squads from abroad. An interesting fact is that at this time Trotsky was not associated with either the Bolsheviks or the Mensheviks, and was not a prominent figure among the Social Democrats, but Krasin began to patronize him. He brought Trotsky and Sedov to Petersburg, arranged them. Here Trotsky had a new breakdown. Sedov was detained, although there was no crime behind her, and Trotsky fled to Finland. Krasin and there helped Trotsky, found him, arranged, gave contacts.

In mid-October, Trotsky returned to Petersburg, and Parvus was there. They launched a stormy activity. The leader was Parvus, he had a connection with foreign sponsors of the First "Russian" revolution. The money for the revolution was considerable, and Parvus arranged for them to release Workers' Newspaper, Beginnings and Izvestia. They were printed in such massive print runs that they overwhelmed Petersburg and Moscow. They also published articles by Trotsky, other Russian and German revolutionaries. Trotsky intensively "unwind." He, who still has no merit, is pushed into the post of deputy chairman of the Petrograd Soviet. Its formal chairman was G. S. Khrustalyov-Nosar, but Parvus and Trotsky were the real leaders of the Council.

From this point on, it becomes clear that the “world behind the scenes,” which at the end of 19 and 20 began its centuries of destroying the Russian empire, considered Trotsky a suitable candidate for the leader of the “Russian” revolution. He was smart, resourceful, manageable and ambitious. That is why Lev Davidovich was "served" by such prominent figures as Adler, Parvus and Krasin. Trotsky in these days shone, flaunted. In addition to the talent of a journalist, he discovered another one - Trotsky was an excellent orator. He himself loved to speak to the public, he lost a good actor. Trotsky himself ignited, brought himself and the crowd to ecstasy. It was not even the content of his speeches that ignited people, but an emotional charge.

At the same time, the process of "rubbing up" of Lenin was going on. He is being pushed back from leadership, the Central Committee adopts a declaration against him, forbidding direct contact with Russia. In response, Lenin leaves the Central Committee. Earlier, he finally fell out with Plekhanov and left the editorial board of Iskra. Lenin did not know about Krasin’s arms supply activities. In Russia, he was going to go in October, after the amnesty, but the pad came out. A courier with documents was supposed to arrive in Stockholm, but Lenin was waiting for him for two weeks to no avail. One gets the feeling that he was deliberately detained. Lenin was able to come to the Russian Empire only in November, when all the leading posts were occupied. Lenin was not a destiny! He spent the night with friends, began to publish in the newspaper "New Life" of Gorky. I went to Moscow, but I did not find a suitable place for myself there either. The contrast compared with Trotsky was amazing. One was carefully guarded, “moved”, the other, more honored and authoritative, became useless to no one.

However, at this time the immunity of the empire was still strong. The virus of revolution was suppressed. The authorities, having overcome the first confusion, began to take active steps. 26 November 1905 was arrested Khrustalev. The executive committee of the Petrograd Soviet officially elected Trotsky as chairman, but already on December 3 and a group of deputies were taken under the ruts of white to the place where such figures should be. Soon Parvus was also arrested. 1905-1907 events show that the 1917 revolution of the year, with the political will of the supreme power, could be suppressed.

In September 1906, the court opened. Trotsky burst into such a speech that he brought himself to an epileptic seizure, causing excitement with his oratory abilities of the public. The laws for "political" that did not personally kill anyone, did not blow up, were soft. Although the leading role of Trotsky was taken into account, he was condemned to the eternal settlement in Siberia with deprivation of all civil rights. Trotsky was sent to Tobolsk Province. Parvus was exiled to Turukhansky region. But neither did they reach the destination. The money was transferred to them in the capital, and the documents were transferred on the way. "Political" was carried without austerity. Trotsky fled from Berezov. Then Trotsky composed a beautiful story, how he deceived the royal secret police with his mind and cunning, and raced on deer across the winter tundra. It was obvious that Trotsky was helped to get to the nearest train station, then he traveled by train to Finland. Parvus also escaped. Trotsky and Parvus without difficulty left for Western Europe. Unlike Lenin, who was hiding in the forest and went to the islands on the ice, he almost died, falling into a wormwood.

Second emigration

Trotsky wrote the book "There and Back." It was immediately published and promoted, made a bestseller. It must be said that some time after the defeat of the revolution in Russia, the fledged revolutionaries were in poverty. Funding channels are dry. However, Trotsky and then stood out. He did not have to look for means of existence, everything around him arose in a “magic” way. I rented a good apartment in Vienna. He joined the Social Democratic Party of Austria and Germany, and became a correspondent for the German newspaper Forverts.

At this time, when the Social Democratic emigration was in decline, quarreling and disintegrating into groups, the Ukrainian socialist organization Spilka also withered. Their newspaper Pravda, which was published in Lviv, fell into disrepair. Then the Austrians, who oversaw the "Ukrainians", suggested that the newspaper be headed by Trotsky. But the negotiations between the Spilka delegation and Trotsky did not lead to success, Lev Davidovich’s candidacy was rejected. Then someone suggested that Trotsky head the newspaper without the consent of Spilka. And Trotsky opened a newspaper in 1908 year, not in the provincial Lviv, but in the imperial capital, Vienna. Spilka tried to protest, but no one heard it. One of the leaders of the German Social Democrats, the editor of Forverts, Hilferding, began to allocate money for the newspaper. The first cadres of “Trotskyism” —A.Ioffe, M.Uritsky, M.Skobelev, etc. — began to be grouped around the newspaper.

During this period, Trotsky became close to the Freudians, read the works of Freud with interest, and even attended his lectures. Trotsky was so delighted with this teaching that he compared in value and depth with the works of Marx.

Victor Adler still patronized Trotsky. He introduced him to the Austro-German political elite. Trotsky regularly visited the cafe "Central", where he was going to high society. And Trotsky, the revolutionary loser, one and the editors of numerous immigrant newspapers, was accepted as an equal! This cannot be explained by the greatness of his mind and personality. He was not a great scientist, traveler, writer, a man worthy of attention. Trotsky has not committed any important historical act. Although he was bursting with ambitions, he tried to pretend to be a historical person. All this in it was combined with the habits of a small shtetl shopkeeper. Trotsky was petty, greedy, sank to a petty scam. He loved to borrow, but did not like to repay debts. Regularly did not pay in the cafe and "forgot" about it. Periodically moved out of the apartment to the apartment, without having paid off with former owners. Another person would have been punished long ago. But he got away with it. The Austrian Upper Light turned a blind eye to his antics, he was allowed to feel part of the “elite”. Before him did not close the doors of the cafe, rented a good shelter.

Trotsky was taken care of for the future. We were patiently working with him, preparing for the Great Game ...

To be continued ...
Author:
54 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. radio operator
    radio operator April 24 2013 09: 03 New
    30
    Trotsky - Bronstein a monster, a monster generated by the revolution.
    Only because he was going to put all the people in barracks, like cattle, is subject to execution.
    We must pay tribute to Stalin that he departed from the ideas of Lenin and Trotsky about the world revolution and was engaged in the country, and not virtual games.
    1. donchepano
      donchepano April 24 2013 10: 44 New
      +7
      Quote: radio operator
      Trotsky - Bronstein a monster, a monster generated by the revolution.
      Only because he was going to put all the people in barracks, like cattle, is subject to execution.
      We must pay tribute to Stalin that he departed from the ideas of Lenin and Trotsky about the world revolution and was engaged in the country, and not virtual games.

      The executioner however the lion the Bloody
    2. Gahprom
      Gahprom April 24 2013 11: 46 New
      +6
      Trotsky - Bronstein a monster, a monster generated by the revolution.

      Trotsky himself spawned a revolution!
    3. ShturmKGB
      ShturmKGB April 24 2013 11: 53 New
      11
      Whatever reptiles have been nourished and fed in the west, only to weaken and destroy Russia ...
  2. Denis_SF
    Denis_SF April 24 2013 09: 03 New
    19
    It is far from a secret that this "impeccable knight" was a tough Russophobe and adhered to the policy of genocide of the Russian population. It is a pity that now not all such "patriots" have their own Ramon Mercader with an ice ax, and they are calmly fluffy celebrating their 80th birthday in London's Albert Hall, promising to live to 90 ...
    1. Renat
      Renat April 24 2013 09: 49 New
      +9
      It is a pity that the Bronstein’s business lives and thrives in the current Russian government. Perhaps this is ineradicable. You can’t get enough of any political ice ax prostitute.
  3. tttttt
    tttttt April 24 2013 09: 34 New
    11
    “We must turn Russia into a desert inhabited by white negroes, to whom we will give such tyranny as never dreamed of to the most terrible despots of the East. The only difference is that this tyranny will not be on the right, but on the left, not white, but red. In the literal sense of the word is red, for we will shed such streams of blood before which all human losses of capitalist wars will shudder and turn pale. The largest bankers from across the ocean will work closely with us. If we win the revolution, crush Russia, then on the funeral debris it will strengthen power and become such a force in front of which the whole world will kneel. We will show what real power is. Through terror, bloody baths, we will bring the Russian intelligentsia to a complete dullness, to idiocy, to an animal state ... In the meantime, our young men in leather jackets - the sons of watchmakers from Odessa and Orsha, Gomel and Vinnitsa - can hate everything Russian. Oh, how wonderful, how delightful they know how to hate! With what pleasure they physically destroy the Russian intelligentsia - officers, engineers, teachers, priests, generals, agronomists, academics, writers! ” (From early Trotsky)


    For every Trotsky, an ice ax should be at hand.
    1. Canep
      Canep April 24 2013 10: 36 New
      +8
      Hitler, in comparison with Trotsky, seems to be the most virtue.
      Quote: tttttt
      We must turn Russia into a desert inhabited by white negroes

      Quote: tttttt
      for we will shed such streams of blood before which all human losses of capitalist wars will shudder and turn pale

      Hitler has no such colorful description.
      Hitler wanted to exalt the Germans, and Trotsky trample in the shit of all.
      1. Slav
        Slav April 25 2013 11: 29 New
        0
        Quote: Canep
        Hitler wanted to exalt the Germans, and Trotsky trample in the shit of all.

        First of all, your people.
  4. Stas57
    Stas57 April 24 2013 09: 35 New
    +9
    For a certain part of the Western and Russian intelligentsia

    honestly, I have not met a single serious and independent work or researcher (American journalists are of course a separate song, it is difficult to call them serious in most cases) who, even admiring Trotsky, did not encounter "difficult moments"
    One way or another, everyone either carefully avoids or gently reminds us that "Leiba Daviditch was not a cake at all."
    In a word, the ice ax fell into place.
  5. Sirocco
    Sirocco April 24 2013 09: 36 New
    +2
    In September 1906, a hearing opened. Trotsky erupted in such a speech that he brought himself to an epileptic seizure, causing enthusiasm for his public speaking skills. I have long suspected that Trotsky-like personalities are a little sick, some are schizophrenic, some are psychopathic, there are patients there with one and the other diagnosis. The trouble with Trotsky is that all these revolutionaries were like spiders in a bank (he apparently forgot about it) as a result gobbled up each other, and third parties came to power. What was not included in the plans of the sponsors of the revolution from the EU. And Trotsky paid for his work, not only with his life, but also with the life of his sons. Alas.
  6. omsbon
    omsbon April 24 2013 09: 37 New
    +6
    For his deeds, he also found a well-deserved award, kindly handed over to Mercader.
  7. Alex65
    Alex65 April 24 2013 09: 40 New
    +8
    “We must turn Russia into a desert inhabited by white Negroes, to whom we will give such a TIRANIA that has never been dreamed of by the most terrible despots of the East. The only difference is that this tyranny will not be on the right, but on the left, and not white, but red, for we will shed such streams of blood that all human losses of capitalist wars shudder and pale. The largest bankers from across the ocean will work in close contact with us.

    If we win the revolution, crush Russia, then on the debris of it we will strengthen the power of Zionism and become such a force in front of which the whole world will kneel. We will show what real power is! Through terror, bloody baths, we will bring the Russian intelligentsia to complete idiocy, to an animal state ... In the meantime, our young men in leather jackets are the sons of watchmakers from Odessa and Orsha, Gomel and Vinnitsa, oh, how wonderful, how delightful they know how to hate all Russian! With what pleasure they destroy the Russian intelligentsia: officers, engineers, teachers, academics, writers ... "

    The leader and creator of the Red Guard, then the Red
    Army - People's Commissar for the Naval and Naval
    Affairs, Chairman of the Revolutionary Military Co-
    Veta, Leiba Davidovich BRONSTEIN (Trotsky
  8. smart ass
    smart ass April 24 2013 09: 53 New
    +7
    When a delegation of church parish councils of Moscow arrived at Trotsky and Professor Kuznetsov began to speak of an unprecedented famine, the dictator jumped up and cried out:

    “This is not hunger.” When Titus besieged Jerusalem, Jewish mothers ate their children. That's when I make your mothers eat their children, then you can come and say, "We are starving." In the meantime, get out of here! Out!

    Retribution. Part II Hostile whirlwinds ... - Trotsky ...
  9. Nayhas
    Nayhas April 24 2013 10: 02 New
    +5
    I wonder where this author in Russia found admirers of Leiba Bronstein? Even the most frostbitten communists hate him, although the USSR is purely his product, the role of Trotsky in the October Revolution and the subsequent establishment of the communist dictatorship is very large. And the imperials of the great power keep him for the devil.
    PS: the most interesting thing is that the leaders following Stalin were outright Trotskyists, at least in foreign policy.
    1. Oleg1986
      Oleg1986 April 24 2013 11: 13 New
      +1
      Kurginyan, for example. http://www.kurginyan.ru/publ.shtml?cmd=art&auth=10&theme=&id=2140
      He sometimes also saliva during performances:

      But I always regarded Trotsky as one of the most important figures in our history. And precisely because for me Trotsky and Trotskyism are an integral part of the red project, Soviet red imperialism and constructive militarism (the role of Trotsky in the construction of the Red Army is too obvious), I consider it necessary to point out the following.

      1. Trotsky’s demonization is a specially invented device designed to break the connection between modern Russia and the ideological ideologist of the Soviet past that is essential for its future. And therefore, it is completely unacceptable.

      2. As a theorist, Trotsky must be considered soberly, objectively and impartially, since many of his ideas have passed into the future (see Bernheim's "The Managerial Revolution", the concept of meritocracy, and so on).

      3. The authority of Trotskyism in several countries of Latin America and in some places in Asia is no less significant. There, the red project is essentially associated with the name of Trotsky. And with all the revolutionary galaxy not alien to this name. Up to Che Guevara.

      4. And nevertheless, for modern Russia, for a number of reasons, it is not Trotsky that is important on the agenda in everything related to state survival and reformatting the strategy (for unwillingness to implement which we have reproached both the authorities and the opposition many times), it is not Trotsky that is important, but Stalin. Various political forces will now and in the near future compete for the interpretation of this key name. We can already see how this happens. Undermining what is associated with the potential of the name "Stalin" is needed precisely by those forces in Russia that would like to forever erase ANY imperial content (Soviet or pre-Soviet) from Russian memory.

      5. Trotsky is often accused of anti-imperialism. And through this they oppose Stalin: they say that Stalin was more important than the USSR, and Trotsky - the world revolution. We will deal with this issue, trying to maintain objectivity.

      Trotsky red Russia (USSR) needed a dozarez. No less than Stalin. He strove, like Stalin, to strengthen it. Many of Trotsky’s approaches to the reorganization of the country, involving its strengthening (industrialization, collectivization, etc.), Stalin simply reproduced one to one.
      1. vyatom
        vyatom April 24 2013 13: 57 New
        +3
        BY A KURGINYAN, A LITTLE LONGER Cries.
      2. dmb
        dmb April 24 2013 19: 58 New
        +5
        To be honest, I am surprised by the absence of a large number of minuses to your post. Judging by your other comments, this is "a voice crying in the wilderness." I repeat, there is no doubt that Trotsky is evil for Russia, but arguments at the level of gossip in the doorway not only discredit his opponents, but also strengthen the positions of his supporters. Here are two commentators citing Trotsky's statement about the extermination of the Russian people, white blacks and love with bankers. This "masterpiece" of the clinic is not the first time on the site. However, every time when asked to indicate the source, commentators shyly fall silent. And now let's try, to put it delicately, to analyze, or to put it simply "turn on" the brains, but of course, if there is something to turn on. If Trotsky said this, then history could only become aware of this in two cases: publications in a publication or from the words of a person present at this monologue. Considering that the monologue is clearly post-revolutionary (the boys and Orsha are in leather jackets), Trotsky is clinical. He tells the Russian people, who overthrew the power of capital and which makes up 80% of the national composition and overthrew the capitalists, that he would destroy these people and love the bankers. I think that in this case, he would have lived no longer than the time required for the publication of the printed editions. The second option is even more trenchant, our ancestors should be considered clinical idiots. did not put Trotsky immediately against the wall, but went to the Red Army at his call. I personally do not like the second option. but the first one is hard to believe. If Trotsky was broadcasting about this in an intimate circle, then finally voice the name of the Jewish hero who told about his machinations to the Orthodox people. ps I hope literate people don't need to explain why "boys in leather jackets" are associated with the post-revolutionary period.
      3. rexby63
        rexby63 April 24 2013 20: 13 New
        0
        Thank you. Very clear. The author of the article, in my opinion, outlined somewhat populistly.
  10. AntonR7
    AntonR7 April 24 2013 10: 07 New
    +3
    Therefore, I believe that any revolutionist is evil no matter what the regime is, since they undermine the stability of the state and lead to civil wars and devastation, I believe that healthy nationalism is the future of the world, immunity from the disintegration of states into parts, multiculture crashes in the world.
  11. Alekseir162
    Alekseir162 April 24 2013 10: 15 New
    +1
    Quote: tttttt
    For every Trotsky, an ice ax should be at hand.

    Well, let's say ice axes were found, and where to get so much Ramon Ivanovich Lopez (R. Merkader). bully
    1. vardex
      vardex April 24 2013 13: 07 New
      +4
      You can run Breivik, also a candidate so wow .....
  12. shpuntik
    shpuntik April 24 2013 10: 22 New
    +4
    Now historians have found that a member of the Politburo and chief of the armed forces of Soviet Russia, Jew Lev Davidovich Trotsky (Bronstein) actually arrived in Sviyazhsk on August 10, 1918, and left it on September 10. In August 1918, the headquarters of the Eastern Front of the Red Army was located here.

    Sviyazhsk 1918: Red Judah in the Red Garden: http://ru-civil-war.livejournal.com/171431.html#cutid1
    1. Gahprom
      Gahprom April 24 2013 11: 54 New
      -6
      Sviyazhsk 1918: Red Judah in the Red Garden: http://ru-civil-war.livejournal.com/171431.html#cutid1

      There was never a monument to Judah in Sviyazhsk, this nonsense invented by the journalist was widely disseminated by the ultra-Orthodox, and the stars on the epaulettes of the Russian imperial army did not bother anyone, I note the skull and bones are also a Masonic symbol
      1. shpuntik
        shpuntik April 24 2013 14: 00 New
        +4


        Gakhprom Today, 11:54 ↑
        There was never a monument to Judah in Sviyazhsk, this nonsense,

        Symbolism in itself is not scary, it is important what meaning is attached to it. The fact that the king and his family (five children) were executed is a fact. Why was it executed so that no remains were left? When they were canonized, there was a dilemma: how are holy martyrs or martyrs? Holy martyrs take death for faith, from the enemies of faith. There is every reason to believe that the killing is ritual.
        http://dvoynik-nikolay.livejournal.com/18377.html
        Nikolay had a lot of second opportunities to "reel in fishing rods", but he did not.
        This is a fact.
  13. Humpty
    Humpty April 24 2013 10: 38 New
    +6
    Quote: Nayhas
    I wonder where this author in Russia found admirers of Leiba Bronstein? Even the most frostbitten communists hate him, although the USSR is purely his product, the role of Trotsky in the October Revolution and the subsequent establishment of the communist dictatorship is very large. And the imperials of the great power keep him for the devil.
    PS: the most interesting thing is that the leaders following Stalin were outright Trotskyists, at least in foreign policy.

    But his inveterate liberals love.
    1. Nayhas
      Nayhas April 24 2013 10: 51 New
      +3
      Give examples, this is unfounded. Who specifically admires him? I remember in the second half of the 80s there were articles saying that if he is an antagonist of Stalin, then it’s not bad, like all the rabble of the Rykov, Zinoviev, Bukharin, etc. But this all ended, in the 90s the history of the October coup and the subsequent terror was actively published, the archives were ajar, and the old faces of the communist leaders from syphilitic to mustachioed showed in all their glory, what kind of love for them after that can?
    2. Ascetic
      Ascetic April 24 2013 20: 33 New
      +4
      Quote: Humpty
      But his inveterate liberals love.


      Because our modern Russophobic liberalism is in essence Trotskyism. The current Russian liberals are a kind of collective Trotsky. What did Trotsky, sent by the Shifs and Hummers to Russia and generously financed by them, want? the unleashing of a gigantic civil war in Russia, the destruction of the slightest possibility of rebuilding the empire, the fragmentation and ruin of the country, the maximum death of the Russian people and the transfer of Russian gold to American banks. And what do our liberals want and for whose grants, the same thing, only under the guise of democracy and freedom instead of a permanent world revolution (read globalization in the modern sense) Listen to the speeches of Novodvorskaya, Radzikhovsky, Svanidze, Posner, Latynina and many others from the liberal legion and make sure that this is true. The same Limonov actively exploits the image of Trotsky in his "revolutionary activities"
      And our entire perestroika, with its vouchers, pyramids, the unprecedented export of Russian gold to the West and the unprecedented death of Russian people, is nothing more than ordinary Trotskyism, which is still waiting for its Nuremberg.

  14. Humpty
    Humpty April 24 2013 10: 39 New
    +7
    Toast So that every Judah gets his own ice ax.
  15. Prometey
    Prometey April 24 2013 11: 14 New
    +8
    Praising Trotsky was in vogue in the early 1990s, when there was rabid propaganda of the Soviet legacy and it was a rule of good form to write about "the millions of victims of Stalinism." Naturally, Trotsky was the victim of a "bloody dictator." However, the pendulum swung in the late 1990s, it was the professionals who showed who Trotsky was. However, even more can be said - the period from 1917 to 1924. - is one of the "darkest" and practically unexplored in our history. The state archives still contain not declassified documents from the period of the civil war. There are also documents in the Lenin Museum that historians have not seen in the eyes. What are they hiding from us? Only a very few who had access to these archives can confidently say that 50% of what we know about the early Soviet period is rigging.
    Back in 2001, I had the opportunity to talk in Moscow with my fellow countryman, a colonel from the FSB Academy. He was preparing to defend his doctoral dissertation on the history of that period. His crusts allowed him to access archives that were inaccessible to the wider public. He then "let slip" that Lenin was a completely formal figure who did not influence the course of history of that time. All the fullness of power and government of the country was concentrated in the hands of Trotsky, who was the leader of the October coup and there was no Ulyanov-Lenin in Petrograd at that time. I don’t know, unfortunately, whether this was reflected in his dissertation. In 1920, along with Trotsky, Stalin was promoted. 2 bears in one den could not get along and a struggle soon began between them, which ended in a known way.
    But what about Lenin and his body in the mausoleum? Everything is correct. In the mausoleum lies the imperishable symbol of the revolution - Lenin. But that's how we know him. And who was he during his lifetime? Those who nominally held the post of chairman of the Council of People's Commissars and the "author" of hundreds of works (in fact, they are the product of a whole scientific team, part of which was completed after Lenin's death).
    Why did Trotsky need a "senior" ally? One of the versions is that a civil war is raging in the country. Requires the presence of senior officials on the fronts and someone who has oratory. Lenin approaches. Yes, and there is also a hunt for dissent at the highest officials of the Soviet government. Trotsky is afraid of assassination attempts (and this is a real fact). Lenin is a public figure who takes the bullet of a certain F. Kaplan (or the one who framed her).
    1. Nayhas
      Nayhas April 24 2013 12: 01 New
      +2
      Quote: Prometey
      In 1920, Stalin was nominated along with Trotsky.

      Stalin was put forward by Zinoviev and Kamenev, who at that time were opponents of Trotsky, while Lenin was between them as a distributor. Trotsky never had absolute power; in the political bureau, oddly enough, pluralism reigned supreme in those years, and a lot of things meant from the opinion of the majority.
      1. Prometey
        Prometey April 24 2013 12: 12 New
        +3
        Quote: Nayhas
        Stalin was put forward by Zinoviev and Kamenev, who at that time were opponents of Trotsky, while Lenin was between them as a distributor. Trotsky never had absolute power; in the political bureau, oddly enough, pluralism reigned supreme in those years, and a lot of things meant from the opinion of the majority.

        This is the modern version that we know from the available documents, and not from those that are hidden or destroyed. I did not write about absolute power. But during the civil war, all important political decisions came from Trotsky (including, in all likelihood, the order to execute the royal family).
        1. Nayhas
          Nayhas April 24 2013 13: 42 New
          +1
          Undoubtedly his influence was great, the victory in the Civil War was his merit.
    2. vyatom
      vyatom April 24 2013 14: 01 New
      +6
      [quote = Prometey] Trotsky is afraid of attempts (and this is a real fact). Lenin is a public figure, takes on the bullet of a certain F. Kaplan (or the one who framed her).

      Both had to be hung even under Stolypin. It is unfortunate that these bastards faded abroad from retaliation before the coup.
  16. Boris55
    Boris55 April 24 2013 11: 19 New
    +5
    They took power in 17. They brought the country to the chaos of 90's ... And they are not enough ...
    Trotsky
    1. Volkh
      Volkh April 25 2013 13: 42 New
      0
      Well, who said that? Is it about what is written on the photo, where are the sources? You can write anything, Comrade DMB said above about this.
      1. Rider
        Rider April 25 2013 18: 49 New
        0
        and a little lower, Comrade Prometheus, said that part of the archives is still classified.

        and some part could be destroyed.

        very many documents published in the public domain are edited, or completely closed.

        in particular, try to find the original phrase of M. Albright "the greatest injustice is that the wealth of Siberia belongs to Russia alone"
        in all kinds of blozhes and zhzheshkah - full
        and the ORIGINAL - NO.


        dare, maybe you are lucky.
  17. Prometey
    Prometey April 24 2013 11: 28 New
    +1
    After Stalin's political victory, the first "cleanup" of the initial Soviet period takes place. Stalin does not need Trotsky and his role in the revolution and civil war is gradually being squeezed out of the way. But Stalin was not a great falsifier and could not appropriate Trotsky's deeds. Therefore, the symbol of the leader of the world proletariat, Lenin, is being created without much farce. However, the real "cleansing" began after the death of Stalin and the de-Stalinization campaign. It was then that either the documents of the 1917-1924 period were hidden or destroyed. Stalin is being removed from the shadows, and Trotsky is not politically convenient to get. Grandfather Lenin remains unsullied. And in the Khrushchev era, the cult of the proletarian leader begins to form in the country with portraits and monuments. At the same time, a fake in the form of "Lenin's testament" is thrown, the "works of Lenin" are introduced into circulation and citing them becomes the sacred duty of scientists.
    Once again I’ll make a reservation - this is a scientific hypothesis, so far supported only by an insignificant number of documents and requiring the opening of archives. Perhaps the most interesting is awaiting us in the near future, or maybe only our grandchildren.
  18. Gahprom
    Gahprom April 24 2013 11: 44 New
    +4
    clap.
    good frame
    1. Gahprom
      Gahprom April 24 2013 11: 56 New
      +6
      in general business
  19. Odissey
    Odissey April 24 2013 11: 46 New
    +2
    Trotsky is, of course, an interesting figure. He is an active participant in all the large-scale events of the first years of Soviet power. Including one of the promoters of the Red Terror. This alone suggests that he would not have become a "worthy alternative to Stalin." More bloody, yes.
    Moreover, Trotsky had his own views on industrialization. It provided for long-term import of Western equipment (up to 50% of all capacities), for which it was supposed to actively use Western loans. Such a plan made the USSR dependent on the leading Western powers.
    PS By the way, it's worth taking a look at the program "The Court of Time", where Kurginyan and Mlechin were arguing over who Trotsky was: the worst development option or a worthy alternative to Stalin.
  20. SIT
    SIT April 24 2013 12: 08 New
    +4
    The role of the leader’s personality in history certainly has a place to be. But looking at the identities of the leaders of the October revolution, the thought creeps in that they are too small and cowardly for such special operations. Well, perhaps only as leading performers. In connection with this, in the continuation of the promised author, I would like to know more specifically with whose money Krasin bought weapons in 1905, with whose money Trotsky lived and traveled around the world, who was the employer of the international crook Parvus. Behind all external political events, probably starting with recent history, there are hidden financial flows. Without money there would be nothing. Trotsky certainly would not have been. So the main question arises - on whom were you walking? By answering it, one can understand certain actions of such persons as Trotsky, Lenin, Parvus, etc.
    1. vardex
      vardex April 24 2013 13: 10 New
      +4
      Jacob Schiff is the personal sponsor of Trotsky and not only him ..............
      1. family tree
        family tree April 24 2013 17: 23 New
        +2
        I would like to know more specifically with whose money Krasin bought weapons in 1905,

        Well, Savva Morozov, for example, and others also talked about who did not like the autocracy, who were afraid of threats and decided to pay off. Although everyone knew that "they are not looking for good," the saying is, they would know how it would end, I suppose they would be the first to run to the police, but to communicate with the "satraps" and "stranglers" request
    2. Egoza
      Egoza April 24 2013 19: 24 New
      +4
      In 1902, Lev Davidovich married Natalya Sedova, daughter of the banker Zhivotovsky, a distant relative of the Rothschild family. It turns out, a revolutionary - and suddenly marries the daughter of a banker!
      Marriage to Sedova allowed Trotsky to reach the largest Zionist Masons: the Rothschilds, Schiffs, Warburgs and others. He was initiated into the great secrets of the “Zion wise men” and, having entered the order of Bnai Brit, became his active adherent. The true essence of Marxism was revealed to him, what goals this doctrine serves, and Trotsky turns into a key figure in the communist movement, or rather, the world revolution, which would bring the Pharisees closer to the centuries-old dream of domination of the entire universe under the rule of the Jewish king.
      http://www.rumvi.com/products/ebook/%D0%BB%D1%8E%D0%B4%D0%BE%D0%B5%D0%B4-20-%D0%
      B2%D0%B5%D0%BA%D0%B0-%D0%BB-%D0%B4-%D1%82%D1%80%D0%BE%D1%86%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%B9/fb
      3a74ab-4741-40c3-b94a-55c7ce96de1b/preview/preview.html
      xxxxxxxxxx
      Leiba's father was a grain merchant and owned 400 tithes of land in the Kherson province. The family had four children, and it existed quite prosperously. and also owned his own brick factory. By the way, bricks with the stigma “B” in the dumps of neighboring villages can still be found.
      http://zadira.info/news/5713
      xxxxxxx
  21. pensioner
    pensioner April 24 2013 12: 59 New
    +3
    Quote: Alekseir162
    and where to get so much Ramon Ivanovich Lopez (R. Merkader)

    You can probably joke in Venezuela and Nicaragua. Well, Cuba is very simple. There are options.
    1. family tree
      family tree April 24 2013 17: 35 New
      +4
      You can probably joke in Venezuela and Nicaragua. Well, Cuba is very simple. There are options.
      Duck, that’s how they themselves, of course, screwed up, let the Cubans fix it, the bulb in the house will burn out, so you need to call a neighbor so that you bring in a new one and screw it in, right, you shouldn’t strain yourself, you need to protect your health. No.
  22. pensioner
    pensioner April 24 2013 13: 04 New
    -2
    Quote: Prometey
    This is the modern version that we know from the available documents, and not from those that are hidden or destroyed.

    So they should be used. Dot until others become available. What is written in them is historical truth. For now. Historians seem to fit that way.
    1. Prometey
      Prometey April 24 2013 13: 26 New
      +1
      Quote: retired
      Historians seem to fit that way.

      Well, historians still consider Lenin to be the author of a complete collection of his works. At the same time, without going into details, how one person could scratch so many articles and works, being in links, now on the run, then on the road. Well, yes, boiling energy, enormous capacity for work, coupled with inhuman genius, have borne fruit. And we should not doubt.
  23. Maximus
    Maximus April 24 2013 13: 11 New
    +3
    Now, if he used to be an ice pick ... along with Lenin and Co.!
    1. Volkh
      Volkh April 25 2013 13: 44 New
      0
      Quote: Maximus
      Now, if he used to be an ice pick ... along with Lenin and Co.!

      Why didn’t you please him personally? It seems to me since there were so many people following him during the years of the revolution, it’s not casual, do you really consider yourself smarter and more correct than Lenin and who? Or are you attracted to the high nobility?
  24. Mhpv
    Mhpv April 24 2013 13: 25 New
    +6
    This is how Trotsky equipped the Military Commissariat entrusted to him.
    Commissioner of the Army and Navy - Bronstein-Trotsky Jew
    Chairman of the revolutionary headquarters of the Northern Army - Fishman Jew
    Commissioner of the Military-Judicial 12 Army - Romm Jew
    Political Commissioner of the 12 Army - Meichik Jew
    4 Army Headquarters Political Commissioner — Leavenson Jew
    Chairman of the Western Front Army Council —Pozern Jew
    Political Commissioner of the Moscow Military District - Gubelman-Yaroslavl Jew
    Political Commissioner of the Vitebsk Military District - Deib Jew
    Commissioner of the military requisition of the city of Slutsk - Kalmanovich Latvian
    Political Commissioner of the Samara Division — Gluzman Jew
    Military Commissioner of the same division - Beckman Jew
    The commissar of the requisition detachment of the Moscow Military District - Jew Zuzmanovich
    Chairman of the Main Moscow Military Council - Bronstein-Trotsky Jew
    His assistants are Hirschfeld Jew
    - Sklyanskiy Jew
    Members of the same council - Shorodak Jew
    - petch jew
    Steinhardt German Military Commissar
    His assistant is Dulis Latvian
    Commissioner of the Border Guard School - Glaser Latvian
    Political Commissioners of the 15th Division of the Soviets — Zennis Jew
    - Polonsky Latvian
    Commissioner of the Military Council of the Caucasian Armies — Lehtiner Jew
    Extraordinary Commissars of the Eastern Front — Bruno Jew
    - Shulman Jew
    Members of the Caucasus Military Council - Rosengoltz Jew
    - Meigof Jew
    - Nazengolz Jew
    The commander of the Red Army in Yaroslavl — Hecker the Jew
    Head of the Petrograd Military Commissariat — Niger Jew
    Political Commissioner of the Petrograd Military District - Zeiger Jew
    Political Commissioner of the Petrograd Military District - Gittis Jew
    Commander of the Western Front against Czechoslovakia - Vacetis Latvian
    Member of the Council of the Military Commune - Nazimer Jew
    Chief of the Military Commune - Colman, former Austrian Jewish officer
    Head of the Moscow Military District - Bitsis Latvian
    Military Commissioner of the Moscow Military District — Markaz Jew
    Head of Defense of Crimea - Zak Jew
    Commander of the Kursk Front - Slusin Jew
    His assistant is Zilberman Jew
    Romanian Front Political Commissioner - Sniro Jew
    Commissioner for Peace Talks with Germany - Davidovich Jew
    Candidate member of the Military Commissariat - Sisur Latvian
    Soldier of the Military Commissariat - Smidovich Jew
    Total: out of 43 members: Russians - 0, Latvians - 8, Germans - 1, Jews - 34
    V.Karpov "Generalissimo"
    1. Forest
      Forest April 24 2013 16: 16 New
      -2
      Talking about it is fascism and other isms.
      1. Mhpv
        Mhpv April 24 2013 16: 48 New
        +2
        In your opinion V. Karpov is a fascist?
        Open his biography and read.
        1. Forest
          Forest April 25 2013 08: 02 New
          -1
          This is not my point of view, but the media, which will never say anything about it and who says it, with a prepared template (see above).
  25. Chicot 1
    Chicot 1 April 24 2013 13: 26 New
    +7
    Such "knights" should be in the coffin and in white slippers, and not among people ...
    A rare scum was this same Leiba Davidovich. And for me he would have hooped up at a very early age from some sort of consumption or smallpox, it would have been no better example. You look and the blood would spill less ...
    But history doesn't like any kind of "if". It's a pity ... Although the ice ax is also very good. And very deserved ...

    Ramon Mercader, aka Ramon Ivanovich Lopez (1913-1978)
  26. knn54
    knn54 April 24 2013 14: 23 New
    +5
    Trying to destroy Christianity in Russia, Trotsky understood that the main blow must be done against the leadership and places of assembly of believers. Churches were destroyed or transferred to clubs and other institutions. Dooming priests to torment - they killed.
    Trotsky about the Cossacks:
    “The Cossacks have no merit before the Russian people and the Russian state. The Cossacks have merits before the dark forces of Rusism ... The Cossacks are the support of the throne. To destroy the Cossacks as such, to dissipate the Cossacks - this is our slogan. Remove the stripes, prohibit being called a Cossack, evict en masse to other areas. ”
    “The one hundred millionth Russian proletariat has no moral right to apply generosity to the Don: the Don must be bewildered, disarmed, and de-energized. Fear, horror, and all, like evangelical pigs, should be dumped into the Black Sea. ”
    After the end of the civil war, when the transport was completely destroyed ... Lenin appointed Trotsky People's Commissar of Communications. Upon assuming office, Trotsky wrote a pathetic order: “Comrades, railroad workers! The country and the revolution are dying from the collapse of transport. We’ll die at our railway post, but let the trains go! ” There were more exclamation points in the order than fate leaves the other clerk for life. The railroad comrades preferred not to die at the railway post, but to live somehow, and for this it was necessary to plant potatoes and sabotage. The railway workers messed up, the trains did not run, and Lenin removed Trotsky from the post of People's Commissariat.
    Trotsky turned into a revolutionary drone. Who does not work shall not eat. I didn’t want to work. So Trotsky (and others like him) were not destiny.
    PS http://ttolk.ru/?p=116396: Trotsky’s grandson Esteban Volkov- Trotsky could become ruler of the USSR with Hitler’s victory
    The end of the “demon of revolution” and “Judas Trotsky” is logical!
    PPS Scary and Trotskyism. But this is a separate topic for discussion.
  27. pinecone
    pinecone April 24 2013 15: 07 New
    +4
    The prostituted "historian" Colonel-General Volkogonov also sang the praises of the reptile Leiba. For the transfer of the Kara region to Turkey and military assistance in the Greek-Turkish war, Kemal Ataturk provided him with a villa on an island in the Sea of ​​Marmara, in which the world community plans to open a memorial museum.
  28. Krasnoyarsk
    Krasnoyarsk April 24 2013 15: 09 New
    +2
    Essentially all left Jewish cocks.
  29. Apollo
    Apollo April 24 2013 16: 57 New
    +2
    Stalin’s struggle with Trotsky. Who really is Trotsky.

  30. deman73
    deman73 April 24 2013 19: 54 New
    +4
    Leyba in fact unleashed the bloody terror in the country and his Jewish boys scorched a lot of people and, well, they robbed themselves under that noise
  31. GEO
    GEO April 24 2013 20: 55 New
    +2
    zhida ruined our empire. Where they appear, everything collapses. If under the tsar they clearly respected the qualifications of settledness, then there would be no revolution, but these Jewish scum seeped everywhere. This must always be remembered. It is a pity that Stalin did not finish the fight against cosmopolitans ...
  32. Shuriken
    Shuriken April 24 2013 20: 58 New
    +3
    Here, Comrade Stalin determined to cut such oaks in the North with a jigsaw, and smeared his forehead with zealot, and the power grew stronger and exalted! But Nikolasha liberalized, a reference there, and how did it end? Reluctance to simply parallel parallels with today's ....
  33. GEO
    GEO April 24 2013 21: 08 New
    +2
    One Ear of Matzah is now worth ... I hate ...
  34. lapis lazuli
    lapis lazuli April 24 2013 23: 18 New
    +1
    introduced him to the new editorial board of Caviar
    That’s what it was called!
  35. Stalinets
    Stalinets April 25 2013 00: 38 New
    +3
    LEO Trotsky: “WE WILL TURN RUSSIA INTO THE DESERT”
    “We must turn Russia into a desert inhabited by white blacks, to whom we will give such tyranny, which has never dreamed of the most terrible despots of the East. The only difference is that this tyranny will not be on the right, but on the left, not white, but red. In the literal sense of the word, red, for we will shed such streams of blood, before which all the human losses of capitalist wars will shudder and pale. The largest bankers overseas will work closely with us. If we win the revolution, crush Russia, then on its burial debris we will strengthen the power of Zionism and become such a force before which the whole world will kneel. We will show you what real power is. By means of terror, blood baths, we will bring the Russian intelligentsia to a complete stupidity, to idiocy, to an animal state ... In the meantime, our young men in leather jackets - the sons of watchmakers from Odessa and Orsha, Gomel and Vinnitsa - know how to hate everything Russian! With what pleasure they physically destroy the Russian intelligentsia - officers, academicians, writers ... ”--- This is who is to blame for the Holocaust of the Russian people !!! And strangely, the name of this ghoul is not mentioned at all. As it was not. ! All blamed on Stalin! It is very important WHO writes history. Of course, the winners write history, but they have the fifth column ... And the red-headed Chubais said that he would read all the books written by Bronstein. Isn't it a Trotskyist? This is who was and still remains in power in Russia. Only the name and color change. A good word is "cleaning" ...... yes
  36. dikiybober
    dikiybober April 25 2013 05: 53 New
    -1
    Stalin pursued the same policy as Trotsky, only in its milder version. The question is where are the brains of those who sing it ???
  37. dikiybober
    dikiybober April 25 2013 05: 59 New
    0
    Quote: GEO
    zhida ruined our empire. Where they appear, everything collapses. If under the tsar they clearly respected the qualifications of settledness, then there would be no revolution, but these Jewish scum seeped everywhere. This must always be remembered. It is a pity that Stalin did not finish the fight against cosmopolitans ...

    just a strange replica. For your information, Deputy Stalin Kaganovich (technically the main organizer of the famine in Ukraine 1933) was a purebred Jew. Molotov’s wife Polina Pearl (Piorl Karpovskaya), too. By the way, Stalin is one of the fathers of the state of Israel ... which is not surprising, because in his family there were also God's chosen ones, not to mention the form with the armor ...
  38. Kir
    Kir April 25 2013 22: 04 New
    -1
    We started with the filth of Bronstein and smoothly through the efforts of representatives with, they themselves know better what their country is called, we crawl on the topic of the famine, well, in Russia at that time people did not die of hunger. With regards to the same Joseph Vissarinovichovich Stalin that he pursued the same policy as a life, forgive me for such a statement? And now, according to the nationality of Dzhugashvili’s affiliation, the facts are so kind, just don’t need to refer to all sorts of resources and authors with a dubious reputation there.
    But according to the main character, we can say for sure that when some are trying to compare one of ours with the so-called true Aryan Hitler, there is no need to look for Bronstein-Trotsky for a long time, by the way, somewhere on the forum he wrote about the Fuhrer that he was a project here is the same thing, and the customers are one shave together amerskih financial and other "elites". And it is possible to fight this scum, but it is difficult if one is guided by the legacy of FV Nietzsche "The Anti-Christian" - to live with one's own mind and be afraid of the tricks of the foul "tribe".