Beijing has angered Trump, and the US president is imposing 100 percent tariffs on China.

21 987 124
Beijing has angered Trump, and the US president is imposing 100 percent tariffs on China.

He "stopped" five, seven (or however many?) wars and is now unleashing a full-scale economic war on China. Tell me his name...

This is a brief prelude to Donald Trump suddenly announcing, after all the "wonderful and wonderful" negotiations with Chinese President Xi Jinping, the imposition of 100% tariffs on goods from China. Moreover, these 100% tariffs will be in addition to the tariffs Trump had already imposed on Chinese goods.



The US President justifies his decision by taking an "extremely aggressive stance on trade."

Trump:

They sent letters to everyone stating that, starting November 1, they would introduce export controls on virtually all types of their products, including products that they do not specifically produce.

According to Trump, "this is clearly a plan that was developed many years ago, and now it will strike the entire world":

This is unheard of in international trade and is a moral disgrace in terms of relations with foreign countries.

One would assume that, according to Trump's logic, the imposition of sanctions and the unilateral increase of trade tariffs are not a disgrace in relations with foreign countries, but China's decision to impose export controls on critical products is a "disgrace." In reality, Washington fears that this will deprive the United States of the ability to source products from China that are essential for its strategic industries.

An angry Trump added that he, in turn, would impose export controls on "critical" software against China. Will China shut down Windows, iOS, and Android?

Against this backdrop, the prices of major cryptocurrencies plummeted. Bitcoin suffered the biggest decline. Once again, Trump is failing to pay off the entire $37,8 trillion US debt with "one cryptocurrency."
124 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +11
    11 October 2025 07: 48
    This is a small prelude to Donald Trump suddenly announcing, after all the “wonderful and wonderful” negotiations with Chinese President Xi Jinping, the introduction of 100% tariffs on goods from China.
    And also the Nobel Prize for Trump bye bye...Slipped past him! There are not only 100 percentile, here, out of spite at the whole world, you can roll 500% to China! laughing
    R.S. Norgov, for the Nobel Prize, should be completely covered in asphalt!
    1. +6
      11 October 2025 07: 51
      aszzz888 hi And what does China have to do with this? The award wasn't decided in Beijing, and it wasn't a Chinese woman who received it. So he's supposedly trying to get revenge on China? That's how Xi might respond.
      1. +9
        11 October 2025 08: 05
        He's just a very impulsive politician. He wants revenge on the world for not becoming a "star of this world." Vanity, "nothing personal." request
        1. +2
          11 October 2025 08: 07
          Chifka hi Well, he would take revenge on Norway or Venezuela, it’s logical, right? What does China have to do with this award?
          1. +7
            11 October 2025 08: 13
            hi When you lose THAT status, impulsive people attack everyone who moves. request At least at first. I think anyone who wore epaulettes in Russia can confirm this from personal experience. laughing Now the distribution, I suspect, will begin in a downward direction, and Venezuela is not the main opponent here. Let's stock up on popcorn (ugh, disgusting, dumplings are better), and wait. good
            1. +2
              11 October 2025 08: 17
              Chifka, and that's why Trump chose China to start handing out beatings. It's doubtful. China, although patient in places, now has something to respond with.
              1. 0
                11 October 2025 08: 33
                Well, how about this... Politics is a complicated thing, it's not for nothing that they study it for so many years in a separate institution. Here, too, certain political figures officially agreed to support his candidacy. They made a big deal. But in China, they didn't make a big deal, even though their opinion would have been O-O-O-Very influential. That's the reaction. request IMHO, of course.
                1. -5
                  11 October 2025 09: 43
                  Of all the supposed commotion, I'm more interested in the consequences for Russia.
                  What will we do if Windows, iOS, and Android are shut down? I have no doubt the Chinese will quickly introduce their own similar system, but what are we capable of?
                  This policy of mutual trade pressure between the US and China will not pass us by. For a global victory is at stake.
                  1. +2
                    11 October 2025 11: 07
                    Lumix, well, we have our software...
                    1. +1
                      11 October 2025 12: 43
                      Quote: dnestr74
                      Lumix, well, we have our software...

                      There is a zoo of operating systems that have not been standardized for software installers, resulting in a poor selection of software.
                  2. 0
                    11 October 2025 11: 39
                    Quote: Arkady007
                    This policy of mutual trade pressure between the US and China will not pass us by. For a global victory is at stake.
                    Global scale... US-China... in the States, a little over a year before the midterm elections, Congress and the global scale will emerge, but the main topic will be the domestic situation with the state economies - and all these tariffs are accelerating the same inflation... the question is what's behind Trump's backs... there's a shutdown, the growth of the national debt despite tariffs on almost the entire world
                    According to official data confirmed after several leaks in recent weeks, $37,5 trillion is the highest federal government debt in U.S. history. This is an unprecedented increase, not counting those that occurred during emergencies, such as world wars or pandemics. Today, the U.S. debt exceeds 120% of the country's GDP. This forecast suggests that the country has fallen into a vicious cycle of debt, which is growing due to military spending. At the same time, the United States is turning its back on sectors such as healthcare, infrastructure, and education, which are crucial not only for improving the lives of citizens but also for stimulating economic growth. And this is yet another unresolved problem for the United States. https://inosmi.ru/20251008/gosdolg-275055382.html
                    And how will they react to the whole mess with healthcare and so on during the elections? And at the level of individual states?
                    According to Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody's Analytics, 22 states and the District of Columbia are currently experiencing persistent economic instability and job losses, which are likely to continue, according to Profit.Ro. Zandi also reported that another 13 states are in near-pre-recessionary conditions. Overall, the overall picture of the US economy looks weak. "The economy is not yet in recession, but the risks are very high. We are on the brink of collapse," Zandi said in an interview with MarketWatch https://eadaily.com/ru/news/2025/10/07/neskolko-krupnyh-shtatov-ssha-vpali-v-sostoyanie-recessii
                  3. 0
                    11 October 2025 12: 41
                    Quote: Arkady007
                    What will we do if Windows, iOS and Android are disabled?

                    This should have been thought about and addressed 40 years ago.
                    1. 0
                      11 October 2025 13: 03
                      Quote: ettore
                      We should have thought about this and done it 40 years ago.

                      I suppose you are already thinking and solving problems that will arise in forty years?
                      1. +3
                        11 October 2025 13: 07
                        Quote from: nik-mazur
                        I suppose you are already thinking and solving problems that will arise in forty years?

                        The problem of OS and software dependence on a potential adversary is such an obvious problem from the very beginning that only a fool or someone working for the adversary can fail to recognize it and take action.
                      2. -1
                        11 October 2025 13: 16
                        Quote: ettore
                        The problem of dependence in the OS and software on a potential adversary is such an obvious problem from the very beginning

                        So, when the very first Windows 1.0x was released on November 20, 1985, you immediately understood the threat it posed in the future, but Soviet officials didn't listen to you because they were stupid and/or working for the enemy?
                        And yes, I didn't see an answer to the question about how you are preparing to solve the problems that will appear in forty years, in 2065?
                      3. +2
                        11 October 2025 13: 23
                        To the point.
                        In the Russian Empire, the USSR, and modern Russia, high- and mid-level officials too often demonstrated shortsightedness in technical matters. At the lower levels, they were much more insightful, but they were not listened to. The boyar attitude toward the new "We Don't Need It" is a historical fact.
                      4. -1
                        11 October 2025 13: 46
                        Quote: ettore
                        High and mid-level management too often showed shortsightedness in technical matters. Those at the lower levels were much more insightful in this regard.

                        So, as a representative of the lower classes, you downright insist that already in 1985 you saw all the possible problems with computerization, operating systems, and perhaps even the Internet?
                        And I’ll repeat once again: what problems of 2065 do you already see and are you thinking about how to solve them?
                        Or maybe it’s simpler and your position can be explained by the fact that the Russian (and not only) man is wise in hindsight?
                      5. -2
                        11 October 2025 15: 48
                        Quote from: nik-mazur
                        And I’ll repeat once again: what problems of 2065 do you already see and are you thinking about how to solve them?

                        What's the point of talking if they don't take action.
                      6. 0
                        11 October 2025 20: 28
                        Quote: ettore
                        What's the point of talking if they don't take action?

                        Yeah, especially considering you have no idea what the problems will be in forty years. Just like you had no idea forty years ago.
                      7. 0
                        11 October 2025 22: 08
                        Quote from: nik-mazur
                        Yeah, especially considering you have no idea what the problems will be in forty years. Just like you had no idea forty years ago.

                        Management has a job title and a responsibility to look ahead. Moreover, the OS and software problem could have been identified as it was already underway, but they were hoping for a windfall. It didn't.
                      8. 0
                        11 October 2025 23: 08
                        Quote: ettore
                        The management has a position and a responsibility to look ahead.

                        So your position is that management must possess the gift of clairvoyance and begin solving problems before they arise? Regarding the topic of our conversation, the leaders of the USSR should have foreseen as early as 1985 that life would be impossible without computers running Windows in 2025 and somehow solved this problem (I wonder how, by the way).
                        At the same time, you yourself, apparently, did not even imagine anything like this, but you can be forgiven, because you are not the boss and are not responsible for anything.
                      9. 0
                        12 October 2025 10: 09
                        Quote from: nik-mazur
                        In relation to the topic of conversation, the leaders of the USSR should have already foreseen in 1985 that in 2025 life would be impossible without computers running Windows OS and somehow solved this problem (it would be interesting, by the way, how).

                        They should have drawn conclusions—their position requires it—and addressed their system. This should have been achieved in 1990, 1995, 2000, and so on, but it still hasn't. In Russia and the USSR, there's a disdainful, dismissive attitude toward anything related to electricity, electronics, and cybernetics. There are persistent, legacy problems with the development of communications and data transmission systems, even in the armed forces. Communications and data transmission are as important an infrastructure as roads.
                      10. 0
                        12 October 2025 13: 42
                        Quote: ettore
                        Conclusions should have been drawn

                        And they drew their own conclusions. Government agencies have been using Linux-based developments for quite some time now. And the fact that citizens use Windows, Vroid, and iOS is their personal choice.
                        Incidentally, Microsoft said "oh, that's it, I'm leaving" in 2022, and then "oh, no, I'm staying" in 2023. So rumors of Windows being shut down are a bit premature. Moreover, it's not entirely clear what they even mean by that. If they just cut off support... well, screw it—I've been living without it for years and haven't had any problems.
                      11. 0
                        12 October 2025 14: 53
                        Quote from: nik-mazur
                        Government agencies have been using Linux-based developments for quite some time now.

                        Rosa, Astra, Alt, Red OS, and others have at least three types of incompatible installers, different dependencies, three types of graphical shells, and even imported ones. Developers have to create multiple versions of the same software, which is why it's not widely distributed and isn't expected to be with this policy. Compare this to Windows, which has two compatible installers and compatibility across software versions and OS generations.
                      12. 0
                        12 October 2025 14: 56
                        Quote: ettore
                        Rosa, Astra, Alt, Red OS, etc. are at least three types of incompatible installers

                        Nevertheless, government agencies take advantage of this.
                        Can you suggest something better?
                      13. 0
                        12 October 2025 15: 00
                        Quote from: nik-mazur
                        Can you suggest something better?

                        The very first thing that was specified in those assignments was a unified software installer standard. All domestic operating systems should have adopted it, then distribution would have been much faster. And even now, it wouldn't hurt to do this for the future: choose the most common one, create a common repository, rather than the current situation where everyone creates their own.
                      14. 0
                        12 October 2025 15: 05
                        Quote: ettore
                        The very first thing in that task

                        So, in the end, we came to the conclusion that conclusions have been drawn and something is being done, although not quite the way you think is right?
                      15. 0
                        12 October 2025 15: 09
                        It's very late and not finished, and everything is being done - here, let go, in the hope that it will end soon.
                      16. 0
                        12 October 2025 15: 23
                        Quote: ettore
                        It's very late and not finished, and everything is done - here, let go

                        Well, this is in your understanding, as a representative of the lower classes, who is not obliged to do anything and is not responsible for anything.
                      17. 0
                        12 October 2025 16: 37
                        Quote from: nik-mazur
                        Well, this is in your understanding, as a representative of the lower classes, who is not obliged to do anything and is not responsible for anything.

                        In real life, if I make a defective product or fail to complete a task, the cost will be deducted from my salary or I won't be paid. But if a senior executive screws up or doesn't do what they're supposed to, they'll get nothing; at worst, they'll be fired. In this category, firing or resignation is a way to avoid responsibility, although the consequences are far more serious than for the lower ranks. So the question of being under no obligation and not responsible for anything remains open.
                      18. 0
                        11 October 2025 17: 49
                        So, our President might know nothing about operating systems; he's old, after all, and he doesn't even own a smartphone. But he also knew nothing about engines for civilian aircraft like the An-2, An-24, Superjet, Tu-204, and Il-96. Did he really think planes flap their wings? Why did they start developing these engines after 20 years of his "sensitive" leadership? As I understand it, Putin's main goal is to build pipelines and ships that transport gas and oil overseas to any of his factions, and in all directions.
                      19. +1
                        11 October 2025 20: 45
                        Quote: ergh081
                        Why did they start developing these engines after 20 years of his "sensitive" leadership?

                        You need to talk to more knowledgeable people about aircraft engines. I can't comment on your statements, much less refute them.
                        Although, judging by the characteristic presentation of the material, I suspect that you are stretching the owl of reality onto the globe of your angry patriotism.
                2. 0
                  12 October 2025 13: 45
                  Quote: Chifka
                  We also have some political figures who have officially agreed to support his candidacy.

                  But they didn't support it.
          2. +2
            11 October 2025 08: 16
            Quote: Murmur 55
            Well, he should take revenge on Norway or Venezuela, it’s logical, right? What does China have to do with this award?

            There is a well-known expression: "To get caught in the heat of the moment." smile
            Trump might have thought twice about making a tough decision regarding China, but then the Nobel Prize blunder happened.
            1. +2
              11 October 2025 08: 20
              Montezuma hi Yeah, right, so this country ended up in this situation, which could really complicate this narcissist's already difficult life? I thought people like Trump always chose people who couldn't answer for the role of shaving boys.
              1. +3
                11 October 2025 08: 56
                Quote: Murmur 55
                , so this country has fallen under this control, which can really complicate the already difficult life of this Narcissist?

                What's stopping Trump from announcing a reversal of this decision in a couple of days, under a valid pretext, as he's done many times before? He wanted to annex Canada and Greenland, but changed his mind. smile
                1. +3
                  11 October 2025 09: 00
                  Montezuma, well, it's a matter of the "weight categories" of these countries. Let's say, casually "spitting" on Greenland or Canada is not the same as doing the same to China, although...
            2. +9
              11 October 2025 08: 41
              Alexander hi Just yesterday, China responded to the US by imposing a fee on US-linked ships entering Chinese ports as a retaliatory measure. Trump's bottom fell out. laughing
              1. +4
                11 October 2025 08: 46
                Andy hi Well, as they say, one thing led to another, and that's why Donnie's threads were stripped.
                Incidentally, the lucky Nobel Prize winner has already made a splash, announcing that she's dedicating her prize to Trump. She hopes that after this, he'll make even more of an effort to help her bring about a change of government in Venezuela.
                1. +6
                  11 October 2025 08: 58
                  Alexander, the funniest thing is that the US has practically no commercial fleet; the Europeans will get the brunt, mainly because they are the carriers of American cargo.
                  1. +2
                    11 October 2025 10: 04
                    Quote: tralflot1832
                    The funniest thing is that the US has virtually no commercial fleet.

                    I remember back in the distant 1980s, I came across statistics on the size of the world's merchant fleets. The United States was ranked either fourth or sixth. England was first, and Holland second. The point is that even back then, it was clear who was the Gendarme and who was the Market Master.
                    But Trump's escalation with China is simply wonderful – they gave him another chance. And he took advantage. This means the US now has more important matters than Europe's war in Ukraine. Now Trump will demand Europe's loyalty and the imposition of similar sanctions on China. Europe is obliged to pay for Trump's favor.
                    And repent.
                    For denying the most worthy the Peace Prize.
                  2. 0
                    11 October 2025 14: 23
                    Quote: tralflot1832
                    The funniest thing is that the US has virtually no commercial fleet.

                    In thousands of tons
                    17 Italy 12,53
                    18 Iran 12,034
                    19 Russian Federation 11,94
                    20 Isle of Man 11,766
                    21 US 11,504
                    1. 0
                      11 October 2025 14: 41
                      FIR FIR I have been aware of the world tonnage under the state flag since the time of the several-hour strike of American dockers. laughing
              2. +2
                11 October 2025 08: 49
                tralflot1832 hi Well, if that's the case, then it's clear why all this fuss started. The bonus has nothing to do with it; Trump introduced these tariffs anyway. Especially since he warned China.
              3. +5
                11 October 2025 09: 07
                Quote: tralflot1832
                Yesterday, China responded to the United States by imposing a fee on US-linked ships calling at Chinese ports as a retaliatory measure.

                This point is worth examining in more detail so that everyone understands its consequences for America and Europe. You rightly mentioned the importance of this Chinese decision:
                BEIJING, October 10 – RIA Novosti. China will introduce a special port fee for US vessels starting October 14, according to a statement from the Chinese Ministry of Transport.
                As noted in a statement posted on the department's official website on Friday, starting October 14, China will begin collecting a special port fee for ships owned or operated by U.S. companies, as well as those in which U.S. companies, other organizations, or individuals directly or indirectly own 25% or more of the shares.
                The fees will also apply to US-flagged vessels and US-built vessels.
                1. +2
                  11 October 2025 09: 17
                  The US Treasury Department has lifted all restrictions on the Turkish "miracle shipyard" that was building a dock for the nuclear fleet (the dock is in Turkey). The Swiss were supposed to tow it to Murmansk on the back of their heavy-duty vessel. We'll see. That's what Russian uranium does. In August, the Swiss towed a smaller dock, a couple of meters smaller (on all sides), to San Diego on this vessel, rounding Cape Horn in a fierce storm. This Turkish wonder shipyard built the dock. Now it's all up to the Swiss. British sanctions are still in effect against this wonder shipyard. It will be interesting.
                2. +1
                  11 October 2025 09: 27
                  Alexander, the tariff of 400 yuan per net ton will increase to 1120 yuan by 2028. At some point during this increase, the tariff will become prohibitive for shipowners. And 2028 hints at something. laughing
                  1. +2
                    11 October 2025 09: 34
                    Quote: tralflot1832
                    And 2028 hints at something.

                    Don't rub salt into my wound, it still hurts. (c)

                    It's not me, it's Donnie who's reacting to your hint, his sensitive spot has been touched. smile
                    1. +3
                      11 October 2025 09: 43
                      Alexander, the Norwegians are trying to sabotage the cod quota negotiations; it looks like a cod war is on the cards. Maybe they'll come to their senses. Russian and Norwegian fishermen are upset about this madhouse.
              4. +3
                11 October 2025 19: 39
                Quote: tralflot1832
                Just yesterday, China responded to the United States by introducing a fee for US-linked ships calling at Chinese ports as a retaliatory measure.

                I think you are a little mistaken.

                Plans are changing: Trump said his planned meeting with Xi Jinping at the APEC summit "no longer seems to make sense."

                The US President argued that China's unexpected tightening of controls on rare earth metal and technology exports had rendered such dialogue pointless. As a reminder, China, as of November 1, has been requiring special licenses for the export of rare earth materials and equipment, and is banning supplies to the US military.

                These restrictions could seriously impact strategic US sectors such as defense, electronics, automobiles, and semiconductors, as the US relies on China for up to 70% of its supplies. Supply disruptions could lead to higher prices, temporary factory shutdowns, and a slowdown in key industries, increasing Beijing's influence over the US economy and weakening Washington's negotiating position.

                I would venture to suggest that Xi stood up for Venezuela.
          3. +1
            11 October 2025 09: 18
            Quote: Murmur 55
            I would take revenge on Norway or Venezuela

            Quote: Murmur 55
            And what does China have to do with this?

            Quote: Chifka
            He wants to take revenge on the whole world.

            Let him take revenge on anyone, even the penguins in Antarctica.
            Leave us alone...
            1. +5
              11 October 2025 09: 21
              sdivt hi Don't even hope for it. Russia has been a thorn in the side of the US since WWII, so as long as Russia exists, this "civilized" West won't leave us alone.
              1. +1
                11 October 2025 09: 29
                Quote: Murmur 55
                don't even hope

                Well, what hope can there be here, if the danger of escalating confrontation with Russia reaches the US hawks.
          4. 0
            11 October 2025 13: 47
            Quote: Murmur 55
            I would take revenge on Norway or Venezuela

            Venezuela certainly has nothing to do with it; the prize was received by Venezuela's enemy.
        2. 0
          11 October 2025 11: 42
          He is a tyrant and unbalanced.
        3. 0
          11 October 2025 15: 48
          Quote: Chifka
          Just a very impulsive politician.

          A politician? )) That's quite a strong word to describe him. A businessman, that's for sure.
          But, in general, he is a red weather vane.
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. +2
        11 October 2025 14: 33
        Quote: Murmur 55
        So Xi can respond.

        Oh! You won't believe it! He finally answered. And "very, very sick." laughing
        On October 9, 2025, China announced restrictions on the export of strategically important rare earth elements. These include holmium, erbium, thulium, europium, and ytterbium.
        It is a key raw material for modern defense technologies and microelectronics.
        Now, 12 of the 17 important rare earth metals are almost entirely regulated by China's Ministry of Commerce.
        China has imposed strict export controls on semiconductor materials and equipment used to produce chips at 14nm and below, as well as memory chips with 256 layers and above.
        An export license is now required for foreign manufacturers using Chinese equipment or materials.
        Export controls apply to dual-use AI research.
        In addition, China has introduced port dues for American ships, which will enter Chinese ports, the Associated Press details.

        Oh, how wonderful, Mikhalych! (c) Yes
    2. +2
      11 October 2025 07: 58
      An angry Trump

      Raging and throwing things? Of course... laughing
      They screwed me over like a total sucker. laughing
      1. 0
        11 October 2025 09: 07
        Trump's actions are bringing China and Russia closer together; their resources and technology will overwhelm anyone. The US should have been friends with Russia. The Chinese are just... they'll quietly take over everything soon. But the US and Europe don't have...
        1. 0
          11 October 2025 09: 20
          It brings us closer, very close. We give them energy resources for next to nothing, and they give us low-quality consumer goods. And we shield them from harm, fighting alone against the predator and robber—the West.
          1. +4
            11 October 2025 09: 21
            Well, you know, I disagree. China is producing some pretty decent technology these days. There are decent products, but are you willing to buy them at a decent price?
            1. 0
              11 October 2025 09: 25
              Well, sure, they do happen sometimes. Just take a look at the first part. They're not equivalent. We get oil and gas, we get beads. I'm talking about that, not advanced Chinese goods.
              1. +2
                11 October 2025 09: 26
                So who's stopping us from releasing our own products? Why can't we... why? Because the price would be like a spaceship.
                1. +3
                  11 October 2025 09: 30
                  Because it's been 30 years since raw materials capitalism. As they say, "we'll buy/trade everything for energy." That's the Russian fast-pitch speculator's strong point. Buy there and sell it here for a higher price. To drain this swamp, they'd have to smash everything, with a bang. And why would they? They're doing just fine as it is.
                  1. 0
                    11 October 2025 20: 09
                    Quote: Essex62
                    Because it's been 30 years since raw materials capitalism. As they say, "we'll buy/trade everything for energy." That's the Russian fast-pitch speculator's strong point. Buy there and sell it here for a higher price. To drain this swamp, they'd have to smash everything, with a bang. And why would they? They're doing just fine as it is.

                    And before that they released ALL? For example, home PCs or normal cars or TVs without chipboard cases?
                    1. -1
                      11 October 2025 20: 35
                      Quote: your1970
                      Before that, they released EVERYTHING.

                      Things were funnier before – they bought grain from the US and Canada. But the turbopatriots don't consider bread a strategic product, unlike Windows. The main thing is that the ice cream was the most delicious.
                    2. +1
                      11 October 2025 22: 46
                      I'll answer once, because there's no point in engaging in a discussion with a profiteering propagandist. You're good at throwing things at the fan in the direction of the USSR. A boy starving under Soviet rule.

                      Before that, they raised the country from ruins and rebuilt the entire, most populated, European part, devastated by a terrible war. It took decades. Gayropa, without the American greenback, would never have gotten back on its own. But we managed. And the priority was something else than driving a washbasin, and no one there had even heard of PCs back then. And you speculated, ruined everything, and now you're begging from China. Or have you learned to make cars better than Mercedes? Or maybe you have your own internals in your PCs or rockets? Buy it there and sell it here at exorbitant prices. You can't do anything anymore.
                      1. -1
                        12 October 2025 09: 30
                        Quote: Essex62
                        And the priority was something different than rolling the ass in a basin,

                        That's why they bought the factory from the lousy capitalists - they had no priorities, and they couldn't do anything themselves!!! - and they slapped out a Tazik without any changes until they stopped.
                        And then a disabled war veteran arrives - having waited two years on the waiting list - to buy a Moskvich, and the Soviet (and therefore the best!!) dealers in the best Soviet style ("pride-mongers!!") tell him: "There are no Moskvichs - only VAZ-2102. If you want it, take it, if not, wait two years."
                        It's good that I had the money - an extra 400 rubles, otherwise I would have kissed the gate of the VAZ and gone to hell...
                        And the damned capitalists have spoiled the little people - they came to buy a Mercedes and bought a Mercedes, not a Porsche or a Logan...
                        Did you think that people just gave up on the Soviet government??!!
                2. +1
                  11 October 2025 12: 53
                  Quote: Jrvin
                  Well, who's stopping us from releasing our own products? Why can't we... why?

                  Laziness and the logic of profiteers seeking quick, high margins with minimal investment. Starting your own production requires large, long-term investments at first, and only then can profit be realized.
                  1. -1
                    11 October 2025 20: 37
                    Quote: ettore
                    Laziness and the logic of profiteers with a desire for quick and large margins with small investments

                    I suppose you are hard-working and generous enough to invest a lot and work hard at a loss or to earn the minimum?
                    1. 0
                      11 October 2025 22: 05
                      Quote from: nik-mazur
                      I suppose you are hard-working and generous enough to invest a lot and work hard at a loss or to earn the minimum?

                      Excellent. Nothing new to justify doing nothing. So you'll just have to wait for someone to take pity on you and throw you a handout.
                      1. 0
                        11 October 2025 22: 54
                        Quote: ettore
                        Excellent. Nothing new to justify doing nothing.

                        Whose idleness are you referring to – yours or someone else’s?
  2. +8
    11 October 2025 07: 48
    One theory is that cryptocurrency markets, and other things, have slumped in the wake of these announcements. What if someone buys up whatever they need now for cheap, and then by the 1st, these duties are either cancelled or postponed indefinitely?
  3. +5
    11 October 2025 07: 49
    Trump is the man of the hour, day, week, month, year... century!!!
    But they didn’t give him a Nobel Prize!
    1. +2
      11 October 2025 07: 53
      rocket757 hi Judging by the way Donald presents himself, one must say "a man of all times and peoples" no less.
      1. +1
        11 October 2025 08: 00
        Greetings Ropot55 soldier...
        The show put on by Trump himself is entertaining, but the dancing around and around that some others put on makes the picture... more fun, let's say.
        1. 0
          11 October 2025 08: 04
          rocket757, well, Trump is a professional showman, and such things are his domain. I think the roles are assigned in advance, as are the texts of the statements. He must go on a show.
          1. +1
            11 October 2025 08: 09
            The show must go on...
            The striped ones have made their move, it’s probably up to their rivals/competitors...
            1. 0
              11 October 2025 08: 12
              rocket757, we'll see, but I think if China doesn't flinch and cuts off supplies of goods needed by the US, Trump will back down, and if he starts bargaining, Donald will gobble them up like E.S.
              1. +1
                11 October 2025 08: 15
                Trump might go for another deal, that's the way he is, he loves making them... however, he might try to turn everything inside out if... well, that's the way he is.
      2. +1
        11 October 2025 08: 04
        Quote: Murmur 55
        "a man of all times and peoples" no less

        Or maybe it would be more correct... A person of hysterics and bitches?
        1. 0
          11 October 2025 08: 06
          Nikolaevich l hi Well, this is for those who are not part of his inner circle, but for himself he is the center of the universe and an all-powerful, all-powerful leader. I already wrote about the God complex on his face.
  4. +1
    11 October 2025 07: 49
    Life is becoming more and more fun and joyful
  5. +3
    11 October 2025 07: 51
    ❝ Trump imposes 100% tariffs on China ❞ —

    - He did this out of frustration that he was not given the Nobel Prize...
    1. -1
      11 October 2025 08: 08
      Quote: Vladimir Vladimirovich Vorontsov
      He did this out of frustration that he was not given the Nobel Prize.

      TRUMP: I'll trade Tomahawks for a Nobel Prize!
  6. +3
    11 October 2025 07: 59
    He will not do anything terrible to China and will not be able to do so in the future.
    China was preparing, it was able to study the sanctions against Russia and adapted.
    China will now cut off supplies of rare earth metals and resources to the United States.
    As well as materials for critical industries in the US.
    And Tampik will crawl away.
    It will merge into zero.
    The trump card will be beaten.
    It’s not Trump himself who’s scary, but the fanatics around him who have lost touch with reality.
    Now they are going to Venezuela to destroy the country there.
    1. +2
      11 October 2025 08: 15
      Vladimir Nizhegorodsky hi Venezuela, like any other country in the world, needs to have a strong, modern army, a developed economy, and a population that is satisfied with its standard of living, not just on paper, but in fact, to avoid destruction.
      1. +3
        11 October 2025 08: 33
        It's not that easy to do, especially when you're constantly being messed around by powerful neighbors
      2. +3
        11 October 2025 09: 35
        Venezuela is too small for all these "shoulds." Where can we get all this? If even we can't manage it.
      3. 0
        11 October 2025 12: 59
        Quote: Murmur 55
        Venezuela, like any other country in the world, needs to have a strong, modern army, a developed economy, and a population that is satisfied with its standard of living to avoid destruction.

        Even this does not provide a guarantee that the country will be deliberately targeted for destruction.
  7. +3
    11 October 2025 07: 59
    How Ivan Ivanovich and Ivan Nikiforovich quarreled


    Classic!
    The golden fund of Humanity’s literature for all times!
  8. +1
    11 October 2025 08: 02
    The US President justifies his decision by taking an "extremely aggressive stance on trade."

    Trump: "Politics is politics, but don't touch trade!" laughing Otherwise, where will Trump make deals? He failed in politics and in trade... ehhhhh
  9. -1
    11 October 2025 08: 06
    Trump is a billionaire and it is foolish to imagine that he does not know how to make money.
    1. +3
      11 October 2025 08: 56
      Trump billionaire


      This isn't an indicator. There's another side to the coin: Trump is a multiple bankrupt.
      And personal enrichment is not government.
      Or will the USA go bankrupt?

      In total, Trump went through bankruptcy proceedings six times between 1991 and 2009.

      https://yurist-bfl.ru/articles/bankrotstvo-trampa/
      1. +1
        11 October 2025 09: 47
        Bankruptcy is a good way to avoid taxes.
  10. -1
    11 October 2025 08: 13
    Of course, you can and want to laugh with Doni. But it's worth acknowledging that Doni does a lot of things well...
    Many people laugh at Doni, saying that he was "offended by the Peace Prize," but can anyone explain why he needs it?
    1. 0
      11 October 2025 08: 20
      Because smoked Obama has it, and the red-haired one was passed over...
      1. -4
        11 October 2025 08: 23
        I seriously doubt Doni dreams of winning the Peace Prize. That's nonsense...
        1. +1
          11 October 2025 08: 54
          No, actually, Donya has the psychology of a child. He saw a toy in a shop window and now he's hysterically kicking his legs and rolling around on the pavement in front of that shop window.
          1. 0
            11 October 2025 08: 58
            It is doubtful that with the mentality of a child, Doni would have achieved his heights and would have been appointed to lead the USA.
            1. -2
              11 October 2025 09: 01
              Its heights are endless bankruptcies
              1. +1
                11 October 2025 09: 31
                But it's worth acknowledging that Doni managed to "rise" after bankruptcies.
            2. 0
              11 October 2025 10: 02
              nothing questionable
              As for RVZ, everything is spot on. I write to my wife that he has the intelligence of a child, and you all fit in, but he is not able to do the same thing for a long time, hence the series of bankruptcies. He quickly lights up and just as quickly cools down, switching to something else. He falls into hysterics when he does not get what he wants.
              This is specifically child psychology
              1. -1
                11 October 2025 10: 33
                Let it be your way, but "he will drink our blood."
                In my opinion, the main threat to Russia is China, and we'll have to bend to the US. That's exactly what the US wants: to deprive China of cheap resources.
                1. 0
                  11 October 2025 10: 42
                  Quote: Vladimir M
                  Let it be your way, but "he will drink our blood"

                  Well, no one argues with that, provided that no one knows what he'll do tomorrow morning, his little girlfriend won't give him any in the evening, and in the morning he'll introduce duties or hand out missiles
                  1. -1
                    11 October 2025 10: 49
                    What's frightening is that there's no more or less acceptable way out of this situation. All the options are worse than the last.
                    Well, time will tell, of course.
  11. 0
    11 October 2025 08: 15
    And then the madman went crazy.
  12. -1
    11 October 2025 08: 41
    Interesting about cryptocurrency... So, here's a vulnerability.
    And China will find something to respond with - it's even exciting... at least something positive has happened recently...
  13. 0
    11 October 2025 08: 42
    Red-haired clown. Someone from his inner circle, at least Melania, would have told Doni that he looks like an idiot and a windbag.
  14. +2
    11 October 2025 08: 54
    In short, now my daughter will start fighting for peace so hard that she won't leave a stone unturned.
  15. +2
    11 October 2025 09: 02
    Has anyone promised Trump a Nobel Prize in economics? The candidate is ready.
  16. 0
    11 October 2025 09: 12
    Trump believes the whole world should act like Pronya Prokopovna from an old Soviet comedy about Kyiv.
    The young lady lay down and waited.
  17. -1
    11 October 2025 09: 15
    He "stopped" five, seven (or however many?) wars and is now unleashing a large-scale economic war with China.

    In a jacket and red tie he is a "dove of peace", and without a jacket he is a "vulture of war".
    Even the Norwegians realized this and did not give him the Nobel Prize.
    1. -1
      11 October 2025 10: 20
      hi No, the Norwegians are closer to Gayrope, which, to put it mildly, doesn't have much in common with Uncle Joe, based on the principle of "who wins?" But Trump got a good slap on the wrist. Oh, and he never forgets such insults...
      1. -1
        11 October 2025 10: 24
        Quote: Serik Bur
        But Trump got a good slap on the cheek. Oh, how he never forgets such insults...

        Well, it was immediately clear that Europe would not forgive Donik's insult and the "award" flew by like a basin over a bathhouse.
        Only in Europe they miscalculated: Donya is more vindictive than they thought. They'll soon see that (you can't hurt a child).
  18. fiv
    +1
    11 October 2025 09: 18
    I can just imagine the American Treasury Department and Customs, and consequently, customs brokers, being thrown into a frenzy by the constant changes in customs duties on millions of items. Trump will plague everyone not with tariffs, but with confusion, and businesses like Belarusian seafood will flourish.
  19. 0
    11 October 2025 10: 02
    I wonder if China will respond with rare earths?
  20. -1
    11 October 2025 10: 13
    Quote: Chifka
    In our country, too, certain political figures have officially agreed to support his candidacy.

    hi Why separate, this was announced in the media, VVP was not against it and others like him.
  21. -1
    11 October 2025 10: 30
    "Will China shut down Windows, iOS, and Android?"
    Author, in China they use their own OS, you need to know such things
  22. 0
    11 October 2025 11: 11
    Trump is seriously not right in the head.
    "The administration of US President Donald Trump wants to ban Chinese airlines from flying over Russia when flights begin or end in the US, Reuters reports, citing a ruling from the US Department of Transportation." https://www.gazeta.ru/politics/news/2025/10/10/26924312.shtml
  23. 0
    11 October 2025 15: 57
    Quote: ettore
    This should have been thought about and addressed 40 years ago.

    Exactly. It's too late now. I can continue lying on the couch and spouting smart comments.
  24. 0
    11 October 2025 17: 03
    Just yesterday, China responded to the US by imposing a fee on US-linked ships entering Chinese ports as a retaliatory measure. Trump's bottom fell out.

    That's exactly how events unfolded. And yet the author of the article didn't deign to mention it.
    Moreover, China set the deadline for introducing these fees at the same time as the introduction of similar fees on Chinese ships, which the United States announced earlier.
    A complete "ugh" to the author of this note - it doesn't even qualify as an article.
  25. -1
    12 October 2025 02: 59
    If the Star-Spangled Banner spits on China, it will wipe its face! But if China spits on America, it will drown!
  26. 0
    12 October 2025 05: 35
    So, China's granting its companies privileged access to the Chinese rare earth metals market is perfectly normal. But when Trump grants American companies (compared to Chinese ones) privileged access to the American consumer market, is that a trade war? Afftar, it's either the cross or the pants!