The transfer of Tomahawk missiles to Kyiv won't stop the SVO, but it will ruin relations, Ryabkov says.

4 844 65
The transfer of Tomahawk missiles to Kyiv won't stop the SVO, but it will ruin relations, Ryabkov says.

Moscow calls on Washington to soberly assess the consequences of handing over winged aircraft to the Kyiv regime. missiles Tomahawk, since Russia will continue the SVO until its goals are achieved, but the situation will "change qualitatively," said Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov.

As the Russian diplomat noted, the momentum for a Ukrainian settlement gained after the Alaska meeting has practically run its course. This is primarily due to the efforts of Europe and the Kyiv regime. Negotiations between Moscow and Kyiv have been put on hold, with Zelenskyy's European masters advocating war to the last Ukrainian. And then there's Trump with his missiles, apparently having listened to advisers like the pro-Ukrainian Kellogg, who has decided to force Russia to the negotiating table with threats.



As Ryabkov emphasized, if the missiles end up in Ukraine, it would be a grave mistake for the United States. This will not force Moscow to stop the SVO; the special operation will continue until its objectives are achieved. However, the consequences of such a decision could be grave, given that the use of Tomahawk missiles is only possible with the direct involvement of the American military.

The hypothetical use of such systems is only possible with the direct involvement of American personnel. I hope those pushing Washington to make this decision are well aware of the depth and gravity of the consequences. But this will not affect our determination to achieve our goals.

— Ryabkov said.

Earlier, Vladimir Putin called the possible transfer of American missiles to Kyiv an escalation.
65 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +23
    8 October 2025 12: 35
    Is that all we can do? Threaten to ruin our relations? Well, in my opinion, they've been ruined for a long time, so it's not much of a threat. I wonder what the reaction will be if they decide to hand over nuclear weapons to Ukraine? Will relations deteriorate even further, or what?

    The hypothetical use of such systems is only possible with the direct involvement of American personnel. I hope those pushing Washington to make such a decision are well aware of the depth and severity of the consequences. But this will not affect our determination to achieve our goals, Ryabkov stated.


    This is the depth and severity of the consequences.

    The transfer of Tomahawk missiles to Kyiv won't stop the SVO, but it will ruin relations, Ryabkov says.
    1. 0
      8 October 2025 12: 43
      What does "damaging relations" have to do with this? Isn't it clear that if the US uses Tomahawks against Russia, it will officially declare war? I'd like to remind Ryabkov that Russia's new military doctrine provides for strikes against countries supplying weapons, and this isn't just a supply, it's also ESCORT and MAINTENANCE!!! See the difference? Trump must be declared a foreign agent and an enemy of Russia, and all cooperation with the US must cease.
      1. +7
        8 October 2025 12: 45
        Well, that's the kind of Foreign Ministry we have. This is how they imagine how to play politics.
        1. +16
          8 October 2025 12: 50
          Well, this is the kind of Foreign Ministry we have.
          What does the Russian Foreign Ministry have to do with this? What they say at the very top is what they transmit, in my humble opinion.
          1. +5
            8 October 2025 12: 50
            Quote: megadeth
            Well, this is the kind of Foreign Ministry we have.
            What does the Russian Foreign Ministry have to do with this? What they say at the very top is what they transmit, in my humble opinion.


            Well, that's understandable.
          2. +11
            8 October 2025 14: 03
            Oh, yeah! What kind of actions can we expect from above?
            What if all the vegetables grew in the same garden and have the same liberal democratic origins, suitable only for flirting with and bowing to Western "partners"?
            We don’t have a second Stalin or even a Kim Jong-un.
        2. -5
          8 October 2025 13: 20
          And the Ministry of Foreign Affairs is obliged to speak politely and diplomatically, and what "it will ruin relations" means will be explained by others, for example, our North Korean allies will suddenly acquire Russian launch vehicles or some other answer.
        3. 0
          10 October 2025 11: 52
          Moscow is calling on Washington to soberly assess the consequences of transferring Tomahawk cruise missiles to the Kyiv regime, as Russia will continue its strategic air defense until its stated goals are achieved, but the situation will "change qualitatively," said Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov.
          This diplomacy is simply astounding. They won't rest until everything is like Kursk.
      2. 0
        8 October 2025 13: 07
        Quote from Silver99
        What does "spoil relations" have to do with it? Isn't it clear that if the US uses Tomahawks against Russia, it will be an official declaration of war?

        Putin believes that Ukraine's acquisition of Tomahawk missiles will destroy the positive trends in relations between Russia and the United States. He asserted that Washington's decision won't change the situation on the battlefield, but will increase tensions between the countries. At a meeting of the Valdai International Discussion Club, Putin stated that the use of Tomahawk missiles by the Ukrainian Armed Forces is impossible without the participation of American troops. In any case, Russia is prepared to respond to aggressive actions: domestic air defense systems have adapted to ATACMS and will adapt to this type of weaponry as well! This comes from the man we voted for!
        1. +8
          8 October 2025 14: 36
          Yes! We don't care about anything! Even if they bring down the Death Star on us... And the fact that people will die, that's just statistics, and the people are already used to it... Ugh!
        2. +7
          8 October 2025 14: 38
          This is the one we voted for speaking!

          As Lenin taught: "State power under capitalism is a committee for the affairs of the bourgeoisie."
        3. +2
          8 October 2025 16: 05
          Quote: opuonmed
          Putin stated that the use of Tomahawk missiles by the Ukrainian Armed Forces is impossible without the participation of American troops. In any case, Russia is prepared to respond to aggressive actions: domestic air defense systems have adapted to ATACMS and will adapt to this type of weapon as well! This is coming from the man we voted for!

          Yesterday was his birthday. I never heard such sycophancy and servility even under Brezhnev, the man under whom we feared neither for our children nor for ourselves. Someone on TV even agreed that the Motherland begins with Putin, as in the song. belay
          "Red lines, red lines." Under Brezhnev, there was a method like "TASS is authorized to announce..." After all, it would be possible to notify "partners" of planned strikes against Tomahawk storage and production sites, not only in Ukraine, if they appeared over Russian skies, via any channel. After all, the appearance of Tomahawks capable of carrying nuclear warheads and the participation of American troops would be direct US and NATO involvement in the war.
          P.S. It was announced that the Americans approved, I think by Denmark, the purchase of tomahawks. So to speak, "food for thought."
          1. osp
            +2
            9 October 2025 04: 11
            The Netherlands paid for the delivery.
            But there we are talking about the latest modification with a range of more than 2500 kilometers.
            More than 200 missiles...
        4. +2
          8 October 2025 17: 47
          While we were adapting to ATACMS, the fleet and air defense systems were reduced. And where is the guarantee that these Tomahawks won't be nuclear-armed?
    2. -1
      8 October 2025 14: 34
      For example, if it's painless to start new nuclear weapons tests, there's no need to glaze the Ukrainians for now
      1. +3
        8 October 2025 14: 36
        The problem is also within us. Within the system.

        This situation was created precisely by the lack of firm responses and constant talk of "red lines," notes SVO member and publicist Tanai Cholkhanov:

        Will our plane be attacked? It will be, and not just one, and not just a military one, and not just a plane. They're derailing our trains carrying civilians, burning fuel trains, destroying oil refineries and defense plants, killing civilians. All of this is being monitored by military instructors and European intelligence services. What do they care about a plane or a ship? And so the question is: what then?
        This situation has nothing to do with planes, he is certain. It reveals a massive, complex problem within the echelons of power, which, to please their masters in the West, are blocking all decisions on tough measures. We need to start with ourselves. By eliminating these internal enemies, we will have made a few things clear to their masters. And no one will even dare to mention any attack on our planes or the seizure of our tankers, for example. And yes, it's time to stop playing around with Ukraine. It's simple and obvious: this has all gone too far.

        The enemy is escalating the situation. At the same time, we are not dealing with a provocation, but with a special operation to unleash a war on Russia. This is a simulation of the conditions for an all-out, decapitating strike against our country, according to political scientist Vadim Avva.


        https://k-politika.ru/russkij-sverxzvukovoj-samolet-sobyut-schet-idet-na-dni/
    3. -2
      8 October 2025 15: 31
      Sky strike fighter
      Today, 12: 35
      Is that all we can do? Threaten to ruin our relations? Well, in my opinion, they've been ruined for a long time, so it's not much of a threat. I wonder what the reaction will be if they decide to hand over nuclear weapons to Ukraine? Will relations deteriorate even further, or what?

      hi The Deputy Head of the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs is not authorized to make statements on behalf of the Supreme Command.
      We translate into our working-class, peasant-like, colloquial Russian: Through closed channels, military representatives of the Ministry of Defense communicated to the military leadership of the mattress makers about the unpredictable consequences, possibly using Russian obscene language, so that the Pentagon would inform its masters from the bidet (Fashington headquarters).
      It is possible that DAM will issue another warning to the red-haired windbag from Washington online that the Premier League will not help him.
  2. BAI
    +11
    8 October 2025 12: 38
    However, the consequences of such a decision could be very serious, given that the use of Tomahawk missiles is only possible with the direct involvement of the American military.

    There will be no consequences for the United States, and the States understand this perfectly well.
    Just as there were no guns, Hi-Mers, tanks, or airplanes.
    1. +3
      8 October 2025 12: 49
      They planned it earlier. They should have hit the Baltics, for example. A hundred missiles at once as a warning. But realizing there's no reaction, they'll continue to press. Until they have to hit the United States with nuclear weapons.
    2. +3
      8 October 2025 13: 16
      For Putin and the Russian leadership, the impression is that the US and the EU are chosen and exceptional people!
  3. +11
    8 October 2025 12: 39
    The transfer of Tomahawk missiles to Kyiv won't stop the SVO, but it will spoil relations
    How can you spoil something that has already gone bad?
    1. +3
      8 October 2025 12: 50
      "How can you spoil something that has already been spoiled for a long time?"
      For example, the Russian Foreign Ministry will ask members of the Russian "elite" to refrain from vacationing in New York and Washington. "Let those nasty Americans know what it's like when luxury hotels aren't filled with Russian patriots."
      1. -7
        8 October 2025 12: 53
        Quote: belost79
        For example, the Russian Foreign Ministry will ask representatives of the Russian "elite" to refrain from vacation trips to New York and Washington.

        Can you name those? " representatives of the Russian "elite" " who go to New York and Washington for holidays and vacations?
      2. -4
        8 October 2025 16: 13
        Quote: belost79
        "How can you spoil something that has already been spoiled for a long time?"
        For example, the Russian Foreign Ministry will ask members of the Russian "elite" to refrain from vacationing in New York and Washington. "Let those nasty Americans know what it's like when luxury hotels aren't filled with Russian patriots."

        No names, no titles, the main thing is to blow into a puddle...
        1. +4
          8 October 2025 16: 36
          Do you just need a list, or should I also attach scans of the tickets?
          1. -3
            8 October 2025 17: 42
            Quote: belost79
            Do you just need a list, or should I also attach scans of the tickets?
            Of course. Names, tickets, and so on. And if you already said you know the alphabet, let's start with the letter B. А And let's begin!!! Like, who goes where, with whom, on what flight, there, and so on for the return trip... Otherwise, these will turn out to be unfounded accusations... laughing Like, once you blow into a puddle, let's make bubbles. laughing laughing laughing laughing
  4. 0
    8 October 2025 12: 40
    The Americans shouldn't be called upon, but rather suppressed by every available means, and their oxygen supply should be cut off wherever possible. But, unfortunately, we probably don't have much of those means left... and/or someone is still hoping to make friends with the Americans...
  5. +2
    8 October 2025 12: 40
    It won't spoil anything, a new president will come who wants to be friends with Putin and they will run like good little creatures to negotiations and forget everything, the Heimars and the Tomahawks and the thousands of dead soldiers, just so the flow of money from oil sales doesn't dry up.
    1. +1
      8 October 2025 12: 44
      He won't come. Vance is scheduled to replace Donnie, and Vance is even more bruised in the head.
    2. +1
      8 October 2025 13: 06
      A new president will come who wants to be friends with Putin.

      It was assumed that Trump would be the next Biden, with his hostility toward Zelensky. But something went wrong. :((...
  6. 0
    8 October 2025 12: 42
    Let's give a warning shot to "rebellious Portland" in the US, starting today at 00:00 AM (Moscow time). By morning, I'm sure more than just everyone will be commenting on VO. tongue
    1. 0
      8 October 2025 12: 46
      For example, I don’t feel sorry for the Finns, but at the same time I’d like to see how they react.
      1. 0
        8 October 2025 13: 05
        Quote: saigon
        For example, I don’t feel sorry for the Finns, but at the same time I’d like to see how they react.

        hi good If we're going to attack Scandinavia, we need to make sure it's visible from Popenhagen - Gothenburg is the ideal target. Especially since the Swedes believe Gothenburg is the only port they can protect for naval communications with their allies.
  7. +5
    8 October 2025 12: 42
    A disgraceful disgrace. If before they simply shook the air and puffed out their cheeks, now even this fiction is being replaced by an even more shamefaced silence. "Let's make peace," "let's return everything to the past," "we're still good bourgeois," and other such talking points. There will be no victory or equality of justice as long as hypocrites and hucksters are at the helm. They don't need it - 1, and they can't - 2.
    1. -1
      8 October 2025 23: 35
      Who are you and where are you from? Your comment gives you away!!!
      1. -1
        8 October 2025 23: 36
        It seems to me that the cypsons feel more at ease on this site than on the censor:₽))
  8. +2
    8 October 2025 12: 47
    Any action, decision, or deed is a double-edged sword, at the very least...
    Drawing red lines is a tricky business unless it's followed by concrete, decisive action...
    However, decisive actions, even without any finesse, have a real impact on everything and always!
    1. +6
      8 October 2025 12: 50
      ..it's better to hit someone silently once than to threaten to hit them many times. (c) popular
      1. +4
        8 October 2025 12: 54
        That's how they did it in the courtyards of St. Petersburg... but apparently with age you want peace and quiet.
        1. +3
          8 October 2025 13: 59
          So it wasn't just in St. Petersburg that such rules existed. It was a common practice...

          But the adherents of the treaty threw a slipper at you and me laughing
  9. -3
    8 October 2025 13: 01
    Why not donate the calibers to Venezuela, for example?
    1. 0
      8 October 2025 13: 05
      Why should the Calibers be handed over to anyone?
      1. +3
        8 October 2025 14: 11
        Very correct question.
        The strong don't hide behind others' backs.
        1. The comment was deleted.
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. The comment was deleted.
  10. -4
    8 October 2025 13: 03
    Alexander Nevsky: Whoever comes to us with a Tamahawk will jump back on his buttocks without legs!
    1. The comment was deleted.
  11. +4
    8 October 2025 13: 09
    Whose relations will it ruin? Our oligarchs' relations with the West? It won't, it's their home. The West's relations with Russia? Well, it's never been well-disposed toward us, so there's nothing to ruin. Cooperation with the West always means exchanging our values ​​for their "beads."
  12. +1
    8 October 2025 13: 12
    One gets the impression that Putin is deliberately provoking Trump into handing over the tomahawks with his weak, incoherent position...
    Who knows? The world is a big place, and it doesn't just revolve around Ukraine. There are plenty of places where you can fly to hurt your partners.
  13. +1
    8 October 2025 13: 15
    Moscow is calling on Washington to soberly assess the consequences of transferring Tomahawk cruise missiles to the Kyiv regime, as Russia will continue its strategic air defense until its stated goals are achieved, but the situation will "change qualitatively," said Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov.

    Does Ryabkov really think the current US rulers didn't consider the consequences before deciding to hand over the Tomahawks? (After handing over the Atakams and Russia's zero response, naturally, Sam's wise men concluded that the same would happen with the Tomahawks.) And now, after Ryabkov's call, they'll finally think about it? How ridiculous.
    And then there's Trump with his missiles, apparently having listened to advisers like the pro-Ukrainian Kellogg, who decided to force Russia to the negotiating table with threats.

    And who the hell is this aimed at? Trump listened to Kellogg!... Does anyone still believe such claims? Trump doesn't make any spontaneous decisions, or just listen to someone else, etc. He's simply a protégé of the true ruling elite in the West, consistently continuing the same policies as Biden and his predecessors. And only idiots draw conclusions about US actions based on the blatant public deception unfolding in the information space, where Trump suddenly swings back and forth. But those who can see the whole picture, taking into account cause-and-effect relationships, the systematic development of events, who know the powerful forces that truly rule the West, what their unchanging goals are, etc. Of course, they also know that, no matter what game is played out for the public, to confuse enemies, etc., the US foreign policy toward Russia (as well as on all other issues) is clearly consistent, never changing, aggressive, and with a constant increase in pressure and the means used against Russia. And, it doesn't matter which president is implementing long-standing plans, carefully calculated by America's greatest Jesuit minds, the main thing is that they all work for the same elite, which, of course, like Trump, doesn't veer from side to side for the public. It is consistent, its goals and objectives remain the same for years. The only thing they (the Western ruling elite) change to achieve them is strategy and methods, trying this way and that, but, I repeat, they clearly know what they are going for, what they are achieving, and will never abandon their goals.
    What Kellogg, in general, convinced Trump of anything? laughing It’s funny that there are still those who fall for such primitive, unrealistic explanations of the decisions made by the US leader?
  14. +3
    8 October 2025 13: 18
    They are openly planning to deploy a high-precision nuclear warhead carrier with a range of at least 1500 km on the territory of Ukraine, but we are threateningly "We call on the American leadership and the American military to approach this entire situation soberly, sensibly, and responsibly." - another rubber "red line" has been drawn!
  15. +6
    8 October 2025 13: 24
    "Transferring Tomahawk missiles to Kyiv won't stop it, but it will ruin relations," Ryabkov said.

    "will ruin the relationship" - does the uncle consider the relationship good?
  16. +5
    8 October 2025 13: 35
    They don't care about relations with Russia. What are the risks for the US and the EU if they have bad relations with us?!
    We do not supply weapons to their enemies, and we do not finance liberation movements.
    We do not threaten to strike the Russian Federation's rear with their military missiles when they launch them... They will not be worse off financially.
  17. +5
    8 October 2025 13: 42
    "...the transfer of Tomahawk missiles to Kyiv will not stop it, but it will spoil relations - Ryabkov..." "Earlier, Vladimir Putin called the possible transfer of American missiles to Kyiv an escalation."
    What nonsense these impotent old fools are spouting! Instead of saying, "One Tomahawk launch against us, we'll burn one enemy district center to the ground, and when we run out of district centers, we'll move on to the regional ones?" And then unpack the necessary tools for this... Clearly, these geezers have run out of scare-mongering arguments, no one's afraid of their mumbling, but what next? They'll cough up Russia...
  18. +3
    8 October 2025 14: 05
    Earlier, Vladimir Putin called the possible transfer of American missiles to Kyiv an escalation.

    Oh, the things we called escalation! From first aid kits to helmets. They always gave everything. Lots of it.
    So wha-a-at?..
  19. +4
    8 October 2025 14: 19
    The transfer of Tomahawk missiles to Kyiv won't stop the SVO, but it will ruin relations, Ryabkov says.

    and yesterday:
    Kellogg urged the West not to fear Russia's "red lines"

    well and....?
  20. +5
    8 October 2025 14: 45
    Quote: opuonmed
    In any case, Russia is ready to respond to aggressive actions.
    Before the delivery of the Leopard and Abrams tanks, there was also talk of some radical responses. wink
  21. +5
    8 October 2025 14: 47
    You idiots, they want to destroy you, and you're all talking about relationships. Shame on you idiots. They even say the West is waging war, and then they start talking about relationships, what kind of relationships? You're just stupid and clueless.
  22. +3
    8 October 2025 14: 48
    This is already starting to sound like the pleas of feeble castrates.
  23. +2
    8 October 2025 15: 04
    Moscow is calling on Washington to soberly assess the consequences of transferring Tomahawk cruise missiles to the Kyiv regime, as Russia will continue its strategic air defense until its stated goals are achieved, but the situation will "change qualitatively," said Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov.

    Where in his words from the article:
    The SVO will not stop the transfer of Tomahawk missiles to Kyiv, but will ruin the relationship - Ryabkov

    ?
    ...And then there's Trump with his missiles, apparently having listened to advisers like the pro-Ukrainian Kellogg, and decided to force Russia to the negotiating table with threats.

    And what will happen to him for not doing this? If we don't have leverage over the US and others, then the enemy does and shamelessly uses it. Only real resistance can be taken into account by the enemy, not theoretical threats and high-sounding rhetoric.
    Trump's special envoy, Keith Kellogg, reminded the West that Moscow had repeatedly drawn certain "red lines" before, but their clear crossing by Ukraine and the West behind it had never been followed by any decisive action. Kellogg noted that these "lines" had shifted each time.

    Maybe the problem is not in the enemy’s cunning (that’s why he is an enemy, to be cunning), but in us?
  24. -1
    8 October 2025 15: 44
    The danger for the system is that warnings and other pious messages reveal the general direction of political activity. Therefore, it is simply necessary to monitor new developments and predetermine the opponents' course of action.
  25. +1
    8 October 2025 16: 56
    The Foreign Ministry is trying to persuade the US not to do this; it's not good, it will ruin relations. But do these relations even exist? How can Russia humiliate itself like this?
  26. +3
    8 October 2025 17: 21
    A nuclear strike on Russia will not stop the SVO, but it will spoil relations.
    All Russians will die, but this will not stop the SVO, but will spoil relations.
    The Foreign Ministry is apparently in a coma, along with the Kremlin.
  27. +1
    8 October 2025 17: 27
    Pure Russian Leopoldism. Although they no longer mention "red lines," it's clear they're ashamed. Although where's the shame, and where's the Russian Foreign Ministry?
  28. +2
    8 October 2025 17: 44
    What, we had good relations before?! Has Trump already handed over the expropriated property and ordered the return of the stolen property? Has Redhead figured out where the EU weapons are going, or does the money have no smell?!
  29. +2
    8 October 2025 20: 32
    It's all due to a surplus of red markers and the fact that we have a reserve abroad for a happy old age, children, and grandchildren. So, they'll give us Tomahawks, and they'll give us JASSMs, too.
    and then five nuclear warheads...
  30. +1
    9 October 2025 09: 42
    I believe that you are in a state of war with us and are trying to destroy us... And Ryabkov believes that they (the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and, therefore, the Russian government) have good relations with you.
  31. 0
    10 October 2025 11: 51
    That's all we had to wait for, otherwise we'll blow everyone away, God forbid they shoot at us, it's fucking disgusting to listen to.