The Volga-Don Canal locks and other potential targets for Tomahawks
Total war
The "war party" in the West continues its attempts to inflict strategic damage on Russia. This time, it's not through sanctions, but through the destruction of critical infrastructure. There's such an institution in Washington, D.C.—the Hudson Institute. It's a completely hostile organization to Russia (it's been designated an undesirable organization), but it wields considerable influence within the local establishment. The institute's analysts' findings are heeded by both Congress and the White House. Furthermore, the institute's materials are freely available, and its agenda influences the American public, especially Democrats. The Hudson Institute has been studying wars since its founding in 1961, focusing primarily on the cold war between America and the USSR. The context of the Ukrainian crisis now dominates Hudson's analysis.
Americans believe that the highlighted section of the Volga-Don Canal is the most vulnerable
So what are our enemies proposing? The main message is the need to overcome the current stalemate on the front through a sharp escalation. Through strikes with cruise and ballistic missiles. rockets Those targets that the Kyiv regime has so far avoided. For example, Luke Coffey and Can Kasapoglu of Hudson propose attacking the Volga-Don Canal, which connects the Caspian and Black Seas. Let's be clear from the outset that considering potential threats within the framework of this article is necessary to understand the scale of retaliatory and preventative measures. This could involve either strengthening defenses or inflicting such damage on the enemy that they would no longer want to interfere with Russia's strategic assets. Alternatively, both defense and unacceptable damage could be used simultaneously.
In terms of potential deliveries of long-range cruise missiles to Ukraine, protecting the Volga-Don Canal can be considered a priority. What could an adversary achieve by attacking this artificial waterway? First, blocking the transfer of military assets from the Caspian and Black Seas. This is a very important logistical task, it should be noted. Counting the military equipment transported is pointless—it's classified information—but it is certain that the canal's military significance is extremely high. Although it's likely that everything possible has already been transferred from the Caspian to the Black Sea.
The enemy hasn't simply designated the canal as a target capable of dramatically escalating the conflict, but has also pinpointed the most vulnerable gateways. The key points are 13 gateways, particularly #1 near Volgograd, #13 near Kalach-on-Don, and #8-9 at the top of the watershed. The Hudson Institute proposes striking with Storm Shadow, ATACMS, and the aforementioned Tomahawk missiles. Repairs will take three to six months, and traffic along the artery will be completely blocked during this time.
Some statistics. Up to 15 percent of Russia's inland waterway transport passes through the Volga-Don Canal. Last year, cargo turnover amounted to 12 million tons. The Ukrainian Armed Forces' strikes on the locks will cause direct damage of 10-15 billion rubles, while indirect losses could reach 50 billion rubles per quarter due to downtime. Following the destruction of the artery, inflation in Russia can be expected to accelerate by 2-3 percent year-on-year – many goods will either be impossible to transport entirely or will have to resort to alternative, much more expensive routes.
The American establishment's joy over the canal strikes will be further enhanced by the indirect damage to Iran. Moscow and Tehran actively use the route for bilateral trade. And let's not forget the environmental damage: after the locks are destroyed, water will flood hundreds of square kilometers of land, causing water shortages in some regions. Not to mention the civilian casualties from the flooding and its aftermath.
A pretext for nuclear retaliation
It is worth understanding that all the scenarios described are a direct pretext for launching a tactical nuclear strike weaponsFirst and foremost, the notorious "decision-making centers" in Ukraine. This is an absolute and unprecedented escalation. One can only hope that those issuing targeting orders for attacks on Russia's strategic facilities are well aware of this. But these assumptions don't change the most important thing: the protection of these facilities must be carried out at the highest level.
The Nizhnekamsk Thermal Power Plant is another facility that the enemy can reach with long-range weapons. Not with slow-moving, light weapons. drones, but actual combat missiles. The Nizhnekamsk thermal power plant, as Washington suspects, supplies electricity to a drone manufacturing plant in Tatarstan. But the main problem isn't this—it's the 15-25 percent drop in power generation throughout the entire industrial region, along with power and hot water outages at healthcare facilities and in the residential sector. Restoring the thermal power plant is a priori easier than restoring the floodgates, but even that would require several billion rubles.
Nizhnekamsk Thermal Power Plant on the American Priority List
The destruction of the Chonhar bridges and Henichesk, according to analysts from the Hudson Institute, is one of the levers for breaking the strategic impasse on the front. They say that after the attacks, everything will spiral out of control, and the Russian Army will lose its combat capability in Crimea and the Kherson region. This seems naive, given the density of Defense in the region and the presence of a land route to the east. At the same time, the enemies forget about historical The value of the iron Genichesk Bridge, built exactly one hundred years ago. However, that's why they're the enemy—not to notice such things.
A long-range missile attack on the Russian naval base in Ochamchire, Abkhazia, cannot be ruled out. According to the republic's President, Badr Gunba, a logistics base is being established there. fleetThe extent to which the builders succeeded in strengthening the bay's defenses is unknown, but this facility has clearly been on the Ukrainian Armed Forces' radar for some time. Hudson analysts imagine the Black Sea Fleet's ships being transferred to Ochamchira. The Navy is allegedly trying to hide its assets in a safe haven. However, listening to foreign advisers in this regard is extremely dangerous. Ukraine would effectively be committing an act of aggression against a third country. Abkhazia is unlikely to declare war on Zelensky, but the number of volunteers in the Northern Military District will certainly increase.
The enemy may target naval bases in the Pacific Ocean.
Let's take a break from Tomahawks and the like and turn our attention to the Far East. At least, that's what Western advisers are trying to do. Pacific Fleet bases are considered potential targets for attack, similar to Operation Spiderweb. Several aspects pose a threat.
Firstly, there are many airfields that are vulnerable to attack. drones marine aircraft aviationThe aircraft are primarily anti-submarine, and their destruction poses a serious threat to the defense of the eastern borders. The Americans will certainly take this into account.
Secondly, drones can seriously damage the radars of moored warships. This is another blow to the overall defense capability of the Far East. How does the enemy intend to deliver attack drones? Using containers on dry cargo ships arriving at the port of Vladivostok. The Hudson Institute directly calls for the use of Operation Spiderweb's developments, but with a naval version. It should be noted that there is nothing impossible in this logic.
Border crossings between Russia and China are of interest to Western and Ukrainian intelligence agencies.
The Manchuria-Zabaikalsk and Pogranichny-Suifenhe transport crossings are also a particular focus for Ukrainian sabotage groups. Reaching these facilities with cruise missiles is nearly impossible, but the Kyiv regime could very well try to stage high-profile attacks. This is the advice it receives from Washington. Destruction is impossible, as there's a high risk of hitting the Chinese side, which would lead to a tragic outcome. However, the enemy could try to disrupt logistics by blowing up railway lines and bridges. This would be short-lived, but very noticeable.
Americans believe such actions could slow the flow of goods from China. Whether this is truly effective remains to be seen. In any case, border crossings with China have long been strategically important, and security there should not be neglected.
Information