Ukrainian drones have reached Tyumen: three UAVs attempted to attack a local oil refinery.

24 870 93
Ukrainian drones have reached Tyumen: three UAVs attempted to attack a local oil refinery.

The Kyiv regime is trying to strike oil refineries deep inside Russian territory, Ukrainian Drones Today we reached Tyumen. According to local authorities, the enemy attempted to attack the Antipinsky Oil Refinery, located in the city's industrial zone.

According to available information, several explosions were heard near the oil refinery on the evening of Monday, October 6, around 7:00 PM (5:00 PM Moscow time). At 7:11 PM, emergency services received a report of a fire. All responders responded, but no fire was found. However, three Ukrainian drones were detected, but their status is unknown. According to regional authorities, the detonation of the warheads was prevented thanks to the actions of specialists.



All emergency services responded to the scene. Their prompt actions prevented the drones from detonating. There were no injuries.



There were no consequences at the plant itself. It is noted that the distance from the Ukrainian border to Tyumen is approximately 2 kilometers. It is not yet clear what kind of drones Kyiv deployed.

Zelensky previously stated that the new Ukrainian drones are capable of long-range strikes, but he intends to request them from Western allies. missiles, so that the damage from blows would be much greater.
93 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +62
    6 October 2025 20: 31
    Or maybe they were launched from Kazakhstan and there was no 2000 km?
    1. +35
      6 October 2025 20: 33
      That's right, they're flying from Kazakhstan. It's full of Banderite supporters.
      1. +35
        6 October 2025 20: 37
        From a technical standpoint, there are no problems at all. It's imported in parts through Uzbekistan and Azerbaijan, assembled in the steppe, and then launched. The steppes are endless and deserted—who'll see it?
        1. +16
          6 October 2025 20: 57
          It would have been just as easy to launch them from somewhere near Yekaterinburg, Bogdanovich, or Asbest. 200-300 km. They assembled their Spiderwebs in Chelyabinsk and then transported them halfway across the country in small houses. It's the same story here. Nobody knows yet what kind of drones they were? Maybe they were just little things, delivered in boxes by a transport company. Or they were assembled on-site from components delivered by the same transport companies. Have our transport companies ever checked anything? There's such chaos in the regions—you can transport whatever you want.
          1. 0
            6 October 2025 21: 24
            You have a strange opinion about the situation in the Yekaterinburg region. We have Beloyarka here and a plant within a plant. It seems like the agglomeration near Yekaterinburg is very dense. It’s doubtful. KEEP OUT OF SIGHT, THERE ARE PLENTY OF EXPANSIVE AREAS IN THE NORTH OF THE REGION.
            1. +2
              6 October 2025 22: 17
              You have a strange opinion about the situation in the Yekaterinburg region. We have Beloyarka here and a plant within a plant. It seems like the agglomeration near Yekaterinburg is very dense. It’s doubtful. KEEP OUT OF SIGHT, THERE ARE PLENTY OF EXPANSIVE AREAS IN THE NORTH OF THE REGION.
              I'm from here too. I know firsthand. Launching from Serov-Ivdel—so-so? But possible. Don't forget—no one would have thought of Chelyabinsk either.
            2. +17
              6 October 2025 22: 44
              What's so strange about that? In Yekaterinburg, the liberals are very strong (read: they rule), colleagues of the liberal-minded government and bureaucrats who have finally triumphed in Moscow, led by who? That's right, the liberal leader. The bearers of democracy are constantly coming out of all sorts of regional party committees. Even stronger, no less than in Moscow, are the tender feelings for the thousands of imported new Russian patriots, a bit Wahhabis, but still loving all things Russian (land, housing certificates, social welfare, schoolgirls). Is it difficult to assemble and launch a few drones in such a fertile environment? Not at all.
          2. osp
            +2
            6 October 2025 21: 27
            Wrong.
            Drones the size of Rust's Cessna have reached Bashkiria, Tatarstan, and Izhevsk.
            100% from Ukraine.
            If this is the "Flamingo", which was announced long ago for these purposes, then it will easily fly.
            Its mass and dimensions are such that even without a charge it can cause very serious damage if it falls.
            1. 0
              6 October 2025 21: 56
              Quote from osp
              If this is the "Flamingo", which was announced long ago for these purposes, then it will easily fly.

              The Ukrainians used the name "Flamingo" for the missiles, and even allegedly filmed a test launch for public display. Meanwhile, the "Lyuty" UAVs flew to the Urals in early October in an attempt to attack the Orsknefteorgsintez oil refinery in the Orenburg region.
            2. -4
              6 October 2025 22: 08
              Quote from osp
              Wrong.
              Drones the size of Rust's Cessna have reached Bashkiria, Tatarstan, and Izhevsk.
              100% from Ukraine.

              ))) Rust's Cessna was transported from the very border, the likelihood of assembling the same Cessna in a barn is much higher
              1. -3
                7 October 2025 09: 23
                Rust's Cessna was driven from the very border
                The Cessna was flown during the Soviet era, but now no one flies anything, fly wherever you want, and from wherever you want...
                1. The comment was deleted.
                  1. The comment was deleted.
                    1. The comment was deleted.
                      1. The comment was deleted.
          3. -1
            6 October 2025 21: 56
            Quote: Sedov
            It would have been just as easy to launch them from somewhere near Yekaterinburg, Bogdanovich, or Asbest. 200-300 km. They assembled their web in Chelyabinsk and then transported it halfway across the country in small houses. It's the same scheme here.

            But there is small the difference between conducting special operations in a country that is leading a military operation and one that is not.
            1. +10
              6 October 2025 22: 33
              But there is a slight difference in conducting special operations in a country that is leading a military operation and one that is not.
              I don't know. Maybe I misunderstood. But when we nobly opened the borders to the forelocked on 22-23, handing them passports with the slogan "Welcome to Russia"—how many hundreds of thousands of them came then? I doubt even a single quarantine passed. They were handed out passports so joyfully and gratefully. They clapped their hands. And now they've scattered all over the country—so you can expect any miracle here. Of course, not all of them are scum, but some of them are definitely suitable for terrorist attacks.
              1. +3
                6 October 2025 22: 39
                Quote: Sedov
                It's clear that not all of them are scum, but some of them are definitely suitable for terrorist attacks.

                It may be so, of course, but in my opinion it is simpler and better to base it on completely obvious things, rather than looking for a “black cat in a dark room.”
                In our area, it is very difficult to assemble and launch an airplane-type UAV.
                1. +1
                  6 October 2025 22: 53
                  In our area, it is very difficult to assemble and launch an airplane-type UAV.
                  Well, it's clear it's not easy. I just gave it as an example. Knowing the specifics of our enterprises in 66, it's certainly dangerous. Taking Kurgan—that's also possible. It's possible from anywhere—if there's a will. I was simply saying that the closer to the target, the more reliable. It's not like flying halfway across the country—the risk of interception is high. And given our level of sloppiness in the regions, anything is possible. That's what I wanted to say... And there's no information yet that the UAV was an aircraft-type one. I could be wrong.
              2. +5
                7 October 2025 04: 21
                They nobly opened the borders to the forelocked, issuing them passports with the slogan "Welcome to Russia"

                But what about the "brotherly" people, this "brotherly" people remained in 91... I also wrote about this, about how many of them were let in without verification, turning the country into a walk-in... And the "guarantor" remained in the times of "goloshes," with its own idea of ​​a "brotherly" people, which has long wanted to "hang the Muscovites"...
              3. +3
                7 October 2025 08: 21
                You are right, there are plenty of different Ukrainianizers and sympathizers for money in Russia (oddly enough, since the times of the USSR, a lot of breadwinners/waterers of Russia with a nationalistic bias live and thrive) they all need to be put on special register as potential traitors with a complete lustration of all social networks and other activities like calls to grandpa in Berdichev
        2. -1
          6 October 2025 21: 23
          Quote: TermNachTER
          In the steppe it gathers, it starts to run. The steppes are endless and deserted, who will see?

          From the waters of the Barents Sea (1800 km), from the board of the enemy’s “shadow fleet tanker” laughing
          1. -6
            6 October 2025 21: 46
            I haven't seen any Bandera tankers in the Barents Sea, and it's a long way to fly.
            1. +4
              6 October 2025 22: 31
              Quote: TermNachTER
              I haven't seen any Bandera tankers in the Barents Sea.

              By "enemies," do you mean only the 404th tanker fleet? Whose flags did you observe tankers flying in the Barents Sea?
              P.S. The smiley at the end of the sentence defines the statement as a joke in response to previously put forward versions drinks
              1. -2
                6 October 2025 23: 34
                There aren't many strangers in the Barents Sea, and you can only go to Russian ports there, so it's a pretty poor guess.
        3. +5
          6 October 2025 21: 34
          Quote: TermNachTER
          From a technical standpoint, there are no problems at all. It's imported in parts through Uzbekistan and Azerbaijan, assembled in the steppe, and then launched. The steppes are endless and deserted—who'll see it?

          Something like that. It's entirely feasible. Considering the poverty of northern Kazakhstan, it's entirely possible.
    2. +10
      6 October 2025 20: 38
      Or maybe they were launched from Kazakhstan?

      Yeah, I don't believe they're flying straight from Ukraine. Although I don't know what type they are. If they're small, then maybe they're from the surrounding area; there are plenty of remote places there.
      1. -1
        6 October 2025 21: 29
        Quote: KVU-NSVD
        Yeah, I don't believe they're coming from Ukraine. Although the type is unclear, if they're small, then maybe they're from the surrounding area. there are plenty of remote places there

        Not that much. Don't confuse it with Kh-Mansiysk.
        1. +4
          6 October 2025 21: 38
          There are plenty of remote places everywhere in Russia, even in the Moscow region.
          1. -1
            6 October 2025 21: 40
            Quote: KVU-NSVD
            There are plenty of remote places everywhere in Russia, even in the Moscow region.

            Good luck in your search for launching an aircraft-type UAV.
            1. +1
              7 October 2025 13: 12
              Quote: Adrey
              Good luck in your search for launching an aircraft-type UAV.

              What type of "Geranium" will it be? They can even launch them from a pickup truck.
              The use of individual kamikaze UAVs of the Geranium family is not a problem and can be carried out even from guides installed in the back of a small vehicle, or, for example, from a small camouflaged site on the edge of a forest belt.

              https://topwar.ru/270989-bpla-kamikadze-geran-ih-sila-v-roe.html?ysclid=mggegs4jh6752986481
    3. -2
      6 October 2025 21: 08
      Or maybe they were launched from Kazakhstan and there was no 2000 km?

      in the article - it's not clear to them!
      Apparently it's cloudy...
      1. -1
        6 October 2025 21: 12
        Who is unclear to them - that's the main question.
    4. +3
      6 October 2025 21: 16
      Quote: TermNachTER
      Or maybe they were launched from Kazakhstan and there was no 2000 km?

      The Omsk refinery is much closer to Kazakhstan. Your theory is probably unfounded.
      1. osp
        +6
        6 October 2025 21: 31
        All these versions about Kazakhstan and the launch from a standing start (and just remember, we're talking about devices the size of an aerobatic plane) are only for the "layered air defense" sect.
        Anyone who even slightly delves into this topic has long understood everything.
        That there is no air defense on the border.
        That there are no helicopter patrols there.
        That there is no low-altitude radar field in the country.
        That all small aircraft fly without friend-or-foe identification systems.
        The main oil refineries are attacked almost every week - they don’t have time to take them out of maintenance.
        1. -1
          6 October 2025 22: 18
          Quote from osp
          That there is no air defense on the border.
          That there are no helicopter patrols there.
          That there is no low-altitude radar field in the country.

          Well, well, small Israel, crammed to the brim with its own and vaunted American air defense systems, has let a fair number of Iranian missiles hit important targets, and before that, the Houthis had fired more than a few. Air defenses haven't been invented with 100% effectiveness yet, and our systems intercept the vast majority of targets, but unfortunately, some drones manage to penetrate defenses and cause quite serious damage. There are also serious specialists working on the other side, both Ukrainian and NATO, and they are constantly striving to improve their technology.
          1. -1
            6 October 2025 22: 42
            So what did Israel miss: hypersonic missiles with ballistics, or plywood-foam tarantasses?
            1. +1
              6 October 2025 22: 51
              Quote: Alien ...
              plywood-foam plastic tarantasses

              Trick question: what kind of mark does a low-flying "plywood-and-foam tarantass" produce on a radar screen, and at what distance, under these conditions, can it be detected for reliable destruction?
              1. -2
                7 October 2025 10: 30
                What did Israel miss, and what are we missing?
                Regarding your question: judging by the results, no one in our air defense knows this... And you don't know... The kho_khly are taking advantage of this.

                ...p.s.: and we let the Haimars pass with a whistle...
        2. -1
          7 October 2025 04: 43
          Are you still worried about the oil refinery? 😁
      2. -2
        6 October 2025 21: 43
        Quote: Serg Koma
        The Omsk oil refinery is much closer to Kazakhstan.

        The Omsk oil refinery is much larger and, accordingly, I think, is guarded.
    5. -5
      6 October 2025 21: 25
      Definitely from Kazakhstan. You can't cover that distance on the 404…
    6. -4
      6 October 2025 21: 31
      TermNachTer
      Today, 20: 31
      Or maybe they were launched from Kazakhstan and there was no 2000 km?

      hi Wasn't this the issue on which the Jewish drug lord met at the UN General Assembly?
      And a day later they attacked the KTK office in Novorossiysk as a cover?
      A week or two ago, a truck with a drone was detained in Russia, so the border and customs with the Kazakhs aren't completely locked down?
    7. -2
      6 October 2025 21: 31
      Quote: TermNachTER
      Or maybe they were launched from Kazakhstan and there was no 2000 km?

      Possibly. I've been to those places.
    8. +2
      6 October 2025 21: 36
      Or maybe it was a janitor?
      Or maybe a crow?
      Or maybe a dog?
  2. +3
    6 October 2025 20: 34
    They could have been launched from Russian territory.
  3. -6
    6 October 2025 20: 37
    Well, further on there are red lines.
    I remember we started with helmets.
    And then the markers turned pale.
    And they attack Peter from the Outskirts, and into the depths of Russia also from the Outskirts?
    Who do you think are idiots?
    1. -8
      6 October 2025 21: 17
      Don't be hysterical, it's time to get used to the fact that you're living in wartime.
    2. osp
      +3
      6 October 2025 21: 43
      Does the fact that St. Petersburg is being attacked from Ukraine bother you?
      In the Tver region, we have warnings and UAV detections literally every night.
      They come from the Smolensk region and then go to Novgorod if they don’t get shot down here.
      What really bothers you?
      By aviation standards, 1000 kilometers is an insignificant distance.
      An aircraft-type UAV with a piston engine covers it in approximately 5 hours.
      1. 0
        7 October 2025 17: 00
        Quote from osp
        Does the fact that St. Petersburg is being attacked from Ukraine bother you?
        In the Tver region, we have warnings and UAV detections literally every night.
        They come from the Smolensk region and then go to Novgorod if they don’t get shot down here.
        What really bothers you?
        By aviation standards, 1000 kilometers is an insignificant distance.
        An aircraft-type UAV with a piston engine covers it in approximately 5 hours.

        Doesn't it bother you that drones can easily fly to St. Petersburg?
        Even the route is known...
        So what?
        Are there any actions?
        Look, the potheads have encased their substations in concrete and stuffed them with anti-drone reinforcement. Now they need at least 5-6 hits.
        I hope they've stopped covering planes with anti-drone tires in Russia?
        Well, there is no need to even talk about oil refineries throughout the European part.
        Will insurers go bankrupt?
        Or it will be like in Estonia: an object damaged during military operations is not an insured event.
  4. -3
    6 October 2025 20: 37
    It is highly likely that they were not flying from the territory of the Schweinereich.
    1. +1
      6 October 2025 21: 25
      Quote: Kill the fascist
      It is highly likely that they were not flying from the territory of the Schweinereich.

      Yes, it's possible. The border with Kazakhstan is 400 km away. The area there is sparsely populated, the terrain is flat with elevations of up to 100 meters. Border control: ground control is so-so (to say the least, there are smugglers), air control – I don't know, but low-altitude targets are a problem for everyone.
  5. +8
    6 October 2025 20: 40
    Only a complete idiot would believe that a bucket of bolts flew 2000 km over Russian territory unnoticed, that sleeper missiles were launched from our territory. After the terrorist attacks in June, what doubts can there be?
    1. +1
      6 October 2025 21: 07
      Spot on! Without reading your comment below, I wrote almost the same thing.
    2. 0
      6 October 2025 21: 38
      A bucket of bolts doesn't fly, but a drone, skillfully launched to bypass a local air defense system, can.
      1. 0
        8 October 2025 18: 37
        The Ukrainians themselves have already stated that their drones do not fly along the LBS and the border because everything gets knocked down, and all arrivals in the Russian Federation are local launches.
  6. -1
    6 October 2025 20: 40
    Quote: TermNachTER
    Or maybe they were launched from Kazakhstan and there was no 2000 km?

    I hope not. It may be a two-seater, but the consequences could outweigh the profits.
  7. +4
    6 October 2025 20: 42
    But Kazakhstan with Tokayev’s row
  8. +1
    6 October 2025 20: 54
    The hole through Azerbaijan to Kazakhstan needs to be closed somehow. Drones are flying past all the cordons for American and British oil companies. Officially, they are there to monitor oil pipelines. That's my personal opinion.
    1. -1
      6 October 2025 21: 09
      The hole through Azerbaijan to Kazakhstan needs to be closed somehow.

      This is for you and me, but what and who will do it there? - and is it worth talking about it out loud...
      1. 0
        6 October 2025 21: 29
        Takayev has big problems in his relations with oil companies from England and the USA. They do whatever they want.
  9. -2
    6 October 2025 21: 00
    Damn. A small education, but so much nastiness comes from it!!!
    As far back as I can remember, problems have always come from “them”.
    1. -3
      6 October 2025 22: 15
      As far back as I can remember, problems have always come from “them”.

      And what problems were there before they poked at the "Ukraine" anthill with a stick?
  10. +2
    6 October 2025 21: 05
    I don't believe these hats flew through a third of Russia during the DAY and no one did anything... I'm sure they were launched nearby using saboteurs, corrupt thugs, etc. They were assembled on site and launched.
  11. 0
    6 October 2025 21: 11
    2000 km? Easy—they reduce the warhead's weight and increase the fuel capacity. As a result, three drones simply crashed at the limit of their onboard fuel supply without any damage.
    1. osp
      +1
      6 October 2025 21: 37
      Quote: Digger
      I don't believe these hats flew through a third of Russia during the DAY and no one did anything... I'm sure they were launched nearby using saboteurs, corrupt thugs, etc. They were assembled on site and launched.

      People are now being prosecuted and found guilty for comments or images on the Internet against the authorities.
      And then they assembled several sports planes that hummed like a tractor without a muffler and no one noticed anything.
      It's funny, though. But not funny.
  12. 0
    6 October 2025 21: 13
    It's not clear! From any portable car or truck! From a Gazelle or UAZ, yes! It's not clear to them! In the trunk of any VAZ, disassembled! Mixed!
    1. osp
      0
      6 October 2025 21: 34
      Yeah, a sports plane weighing half a ton with a wingspan of 11 meters.
      They were the ones who visited Tatarstan, particularly Yelabuga. Izhevsk too. They even flew as far as Dagestan.
      Such a device requires 500, 800 or even more lanes when loading and refueling.
      Have a good streak.
      And without Starlink communication, without TERCON data, he is a complete zero.
  13. +3
    6 October 2025 21: 16
    Don't make a fuss. The refinery isn't small, but it's not gigantic either. The windows face the other way, but there's no sign of a major fire.
    All emergency services arrived at the scene.

    Yes, the "large-scale movement" in the city is noticeable.
    What's more interesting is that this morning, gas stations belonging to this refinery switched to a "limit" of 30 liters of gasoline per day, "in hand," and no cash or card payments allowed. Only "fuel cards," which they promise to "introduce" in the near future.
    Lukoil and Gazpromneft are operating as usual, without restrictions.
    Let's see what happens next.
  14. osp
    +1
    6 October 2025 21: 40
    Quote from MaxKruh
    Only a complete idiot would believe that a bucket of bolts flew 2000 km over Russian territory unnoticed, that sleeper missiles were launched from our territory. After the terrorist attacks in June, what doubts can there be?

    And if someone notices him even during the day, what then, will they set the dogs after him?
    When flying over forests, only birds will hear it.
    Given the low flight altitude, even if the radars at the airports noticed it, it would disappear from the screens in literally a minute or half a minute.
    Went beyond the radio horizon and that's it.
    The US has excellent satellite reconnaissance data, including electronic intelligence.
    There are no problems.
    1. -1
      6 October 2025 22: 21
      On the way there are the Ural Mountains, the winds... bam and you're where you need to be... only naive children will believe it
  15. -1
    6 October 2025 21: 42
    Believe it or not, from Ukraine or not, like girls reading fortunes on a daisy, it’s a fact, they flew to Tyumen, showed the wreckage, it would have been clear, but it’s unlikely, unless someone leaks it.
  16. 0
    6 October 2025 22: 29
    Wherever it came from, we didn't see it, didn't shoot it down at the border, didn't catch it on camera. So, we can't hold anyone accountable. Maybe from Kazakhstan, but we have some flying in from Ukraine, too, and they're shot down at facilities, not near the border.
    1. -2
      7 October 2025 03: 57
      And if they'd seen it was from Kazakhstan, what would they have charged? They'd have said it came from Azerbaijan, or even from the Caspian Sea, flew over us, and then on to you.
      We're too lazy to use hearing aids to detect low-flying targets? We're too lazy. We're too lazy to use our satellite data to see where the plane was coming from? We're too lazy.
      Big deal, they'll raise the price of gasoline for the serfs, it's high time.
  17. -1
    6 October 2025 22: 30
    It's strange, mobile communications and the internet have been jammed almost everywhere, but enemy drones are still flying across half of Russia ))) It seems to me the authorities don't care about drones, the main thing is to transfer everyone to MAX, where "Comrade Major" will feel like he's the boss of other people's correspondence.
    1. -3
      7 October 2025 04: 50
      And who is forcing you to use Max?
  18. 0
    6 October 2025 22: 48
    Well, it's just a futile document, 2000 in a direct line, either they launch it from the Republic of Kazakhstan, or directly in Tyumen
  19. 0
    6 October 2025 23: 42
    In May 2023, when the first Ukrainian drone attack on Moscow took place, many here also did not believe that they could fly from Ukraine.
    During war, weapons develop rapidly, both ours and the enemy's. An aircraft with a reduced warhead weight could easily fly this distance, bypassing the nodes of a focal air defense system. The equinox has passed, and the nights have become darker. In 2023, as far as I remember, the attack range was up to 700 km, in 2024 up to 1200 km, and 2000 km in 2025 is entirely acceptable.

    The Flamingo missile, with its 3-kilometer range, is hard to believe, as it violates the principles of evolutionary weapon development.
    1. osp
      -1
      7 October 2025 01: 00
      There aren't many jet engines that can carry the Flamingo - both are Soviet.
      Either the AI-25 from the L-39 aircraft, or the one that was still on the Soviet Strizh UAVs.
      Both could be done in Zaporizhzhia.
      The West can't supply such engines - they haven't even had similar missiles for a long time.
      The only thing that is similar is the "Hound Dog" that was used on the B-52 back in the 60s.
  20. +2
    6 October 2025 23: 50
    Our country's government agencies are diligently suppressing full information about incidents of this nature...they only grudgingly reveal what can't be hidden from the ubiquitous microbloggers with their smartphones. So our speculation and assumptions are pointless. There's little factual evidence.
  21. +2
    7 October 2025 00: 54
    Kazakhstan, just from there.
    1. The comment was deleted.
  22. 0
    7 October 2025 01: 18
    Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
    Well, it's just a futile document, 2000 in a direct line, either they launch it from the Republic of Kazakhstan, or directly in Tyumen

    No, Antipino is now an industrial zone in Tyumen. If there had been a launch, they would have reported it. To the north is the Tobolsk Highway, police are constantly on duty, to the south is the Yalutorovsky Highway, there are also checkpoints. There's also the Moskovsky Highway, but I didn't see any police there. If they did bring anyone, it was through Yekaterinburg. Well, that's just my theory, sorry if that's wrong. hi
  23. +2
    7 October 2025 01: 28
    Tyumen is almost 3 km from Ukraine, and only 400 km from the border with Kazakhstan.
    The Ukrainians don't have drones with that kind of range, but it's easy to get from Kazakhstan. There's steppes and no one there—a truck just shows up and launches the drones. And they have nothing to show for it—there's no evidence.
  24. -1
    7 October 2025 01: 39
    Well, gentlemen, Trump has decided to give the tomahawks, and the US doesn't care about relations with Russia. The US truly considers Russia a paper tiger. If Russia doesn't respond painfully and strongly for this, then I don't know who's running Russia! This is my opinion, and it may be wrong!
  25. +1
    7 October 2025 01: 55
    Quote: Gella
    Tyumen is almost 3 km from Ukraine, and only 400 km from the border with Kazakhstan.
    The Ukrainians don't have drones with that kind of range, but it's easy to get from Kazakhstan. There's steppes and no one there—a truck just shows up and launches the drones. And they have nothing to show for it—there's no evidence.

    Although it's a bit doubtful... I'll put it this way... There are security forces located near Tyumen, and drone flights would have been noticed. Especially from the south. Those from Tyumen know what I'm talking about. There's an airport in the north, and there are radars there. The only direction is the west of the region.
    1. 0
      7 October 2025 06: 34
      The airport in Tyumen is located in the western part.
  26. -2
    7 October 2025 02: 21
    They're already writing about tomahawks. I'm wondering if this is a red line, or not quite.
  27. 0
    7 October 2025 05: 21
    Quote: TermNachTER
    Or maybe they were launched from Kazakhstan and there was no 2000 km?
    They could have been launched from a truck in the Tyumen region.
  28. +3
    7 October 2025 06: 29
    They clearly weren't launched from their territory! Either from ours or from Kazakhstan.
  29. +1
    7 October 2025 06: 55
    I witnessed the search for the AN-2 that disappeared near Serov. There was a lot of noise on TV, but the authorities on the ground couldn't care less. It was funny and sad.
  30. 0
    7 October 2025 07: 26
    is it t ukelele nazis or their puppet master doing all the work with the ukelele,s taking all the glory
  31. 0
    7 October 2025 07: 35
    is it t ukelele nazis or their puppet master doing all the work with the ukelele,s taking all the glory
    lot of help needs to be given to others who are being bullied by the west
    when their planes and ships and peoples start to disappear, maybe they will think twice about their actions
  32. +1
    7 October 2025 08: 23
    Reading messages like these, I understand that the SMERSH issue is simply overdue.
  33. +2
    7 October 2025 09: 35
    I don't believe that UAVs flew 2000 km
    Most likely they would have been noticed in flight, they were certainly not launched from Ukraine.
  34. -2
    7 October 2025 12: 59
    WHERE is the corresponding answer??????????????? am
  35. 0
    7 October 2025 15: 09
    Ukrainian drones have reached Tyumen: three UAVs attempted to attack a local oil refinery.

    The FSB needs to deal with these UAVs that appeared out of nowhere.
    I wouldn't be surprised if it turns out the Bandar-logs have built a viper's nest in Kazakhstan and are trying to get us out. But this needs to be dealt with very seriously!
  36. 0
    7 October 2025 15: 54
    I saw a small plane flying along the air route a couple of times, as if nothing had happened, though heading west of Chelyabinsk. I don't know what kind of aircraft it was or whether it had permission to fly, but it was flying at an altitude of a couple of kilometers. I've never seen such a plane before. Right along the air route where planes fly.