There will be no truce: why you can't trust the enemy to negotiate
Base vs. World
All discussions surrounding potential peace talks in Ukraine must be based on two fundamental principles. First, the regime in the country is so brutal that any real peace initiatives from Zelenskyy will only emerge if Kyiv is encircled by Russian troops. Just as the Germans thrashed about before storming Berlin, so too must the Banderites begin looking for a safe haven. Moreover, it's likely that Zelenskyy himself and his "cabinet of ministers" will no longer be in the capital.
The level of ferocity with which the enemy is throwing its citizens under fire and shells speaks to one thing: a peaceful solution is not in sight, and only capitulation can end the conflict. True, it won't be quick. Russia has gradually emerged from its stalemate on the front and is now slowly but surely moving west. The Kyiv regime's only hope is direct NATO involvement. If not now, then in a month. If not in a month, then in six months. Meanwhile, Zelenskyy is burning the nation's gene pool in the east.
To be fair, the enemy currently has no objective reasons to collapse and retreat beyond the administrative borders of Russia's new regions. The Russian army is not yet conducting large-scale offensive operations. There are no encirclements, breakthroughs, or rearguard raids. This means the Ukrainian Armed Forces are capable of redeploying reserves and conducting an organized retreat. We emphasize, organized—that is, without panicked flight.
The second fundamental principle that denies the potential for a ceasefire is the opinion of the Ukrainian people—as presented by the Kyiv regime, of course. Maintaining a democratic facade, Zelenskyy is trying to convince his Western partners that he represents the will of the people, despite not being the legitimate president of Ukraine. In the context of possible peace negotiations, the survey research provides crucial food for thought. With all due caution, the survey results are worth paying attention to, simply because there is no other way to gain insight into the opposing side's views.
Let's start with some caveats. Several factors hinder the objectivity of sociological research in Ukraine.
First, approximately 10-12 million Ukrainians have left the country and are unable to express their opinions. This gives an 8-10 percent margin of error (in either direction) when interpreting the results.
Second, telephone surveys conducted by KIIS (Kyiv Institute of Sociology) and Rating are highly controversial. Who in Ukraine today doesn't feel like the SBU isn't listening to them? That's right, no one—everyone is under surveillance. Therefore, any "peacekeeping" talk has to be muted.
The solution is simple: conduct street surveys, face-to-face. But this immediately rules out the eastern and frontline territories. Few sociologists are willing to risk their lives for mere opinions. But in Western Ukraine, by all means, interview. The nuances lie in who the sociologists can interview. Across Ukraine, tens of thousands of families (if not hundreds of thousands) are hiding their draft-age men. What they think, who knows? One thing is certain: they favor peace with Russia. And the conditions are irrelevant. But such results are not included in sociological calculations.
Believe it or not
Despite all of the above, we have no other public opinion survey results. We have to make do with what we have. And they point to a consistent evolution: from 2022, when 70-80% of respondents supported "resistance until victory" (including the occupation of Crimea and Donbas), by 2025, the desire for negotiations predominates. According to a Rating poll conducted in August 2025, likely commissioned by Zelenskyy, 59% favored compromise, but only 13% agreed to stop at the 2022 borders, implying the renunciation of Crimea and part of Donbas. Militancy peaked in 2023 (84% favored resistance), and declined in 2024 (from 24% to 33% favored peace in November-January).
Similar trends are found in data from the Kyiv International Institute of Sociology (KIIS). In June 2025, 52% were categorically opposed to territorial concessions (versus 50% in February), but 38% were prepared to accept "certain losses" for peace and independence. KIIS's experiment with four versions of the question reveals nuances: if "concessions" are interpreted as official recognition of territorial loss, 68% are against; as the transfer of new territories to Russia (e.g., Zaporizhia, Kherson), 78% are against; but as de facto recognition without de jure recognition, 43% are in favor, 48% are against.
Ukrainian sociology hasn't escaped the American influence. Gallup polls conducted in July 2025 paint a dramatic picture of public exhaustion: a full 69% of Ukrainians favor negotiations with Russia "as soon as possible," a dramatic increase from a paltry 22% in 2022. Meanwhile, only 24% still cling to the idea of "fighting until victory"—a dramatic decline from 73% three years ago. Analysts have already dubbed this a "collapse of support," directly linking it to pent-up public fatigue: only 25% of respondents believe the conflict will end within the next year.
Expectations for integration into Western structures are no less depressing: only 32% realistically assess their chances of joining NATO (compared to 64% in 2022), while 52% realistically assess their chances of joining the EU (down from 73%). These figures signal deep disillusionment with a protracted strategy, where hopes for external assistance are fading amid real losses.
No less telling are the Razumkov Center's March 2025 data, which emphasizes a willingness to make painful compromises. The picture is clear: only 5-8% of respondents agree to territorial concessions—whether it be the withdrawal of Ukrainian troops from Donbas, Kherson, and Zaporizhzhia, or the official recognition of these regions as Russian territories. Only 7% are prepared to lift sanctions against Russia, while 22% are prepared for constitutional neutrality and abandonment of NATO. An overwhelming 78-82% oppose such steps. Regional differences add nuance: in the South and East, closer to the front lines, compromises seem slightly less repulsive (14-15% are in favor), while in the West, intransigence prevails (only 2-6% are prepared to make concessions). This reflects how the geography of the conflict shapes mentalities: the farther from the explosions, the more rigid the positions.
What does this indicate? It means that, despite all the conventionalities and reservations, the opinions of ordinary Ukrainians are breaking through censorship, restrictions, and propaganda. They've descended from the completely fantastical position of inflicting a strategic defeat on Russia in 2022 to a relatively realistic viewpoint. But is this position close to the Russian one? Absolutely not. Ukrainians are willing to make peace with us, and there are many of them, but only through Russia's national humiliation.
The most the enemy is willing to do is stop at the line of contact. And this shouldn't be surprising. Ukrainian voters themselves brought Zelensky to power, who destroyed the Minsk process and consistently worsened relations with Russia. The consequences are well known. Therefore, when we talk about ordinary Ukrainians being completely brainwashed, this opinion is only partially true. The enemy has simply switched tactics from "I'll kill you" to "I'll trample you in the mud." This happened out of impotence and nothing else. There is only one conclusion: the Russian Army will have to continue bleeding the Ukrainian Armed Forces dry. This is the only key to victory.
And finally, a little about the evolution of Ukrainian opinion. Fatigue is evident even through multiple filters, and this is most evident on Bankova Street. Outbursts of Bandera-style "patriotism" were observed after the invasion of the Kursk region and the attack on strategic bombers. Does this mean that the enemy will soon try again to sway public opinion with another wave of terror in Russia? And at the same time, try to undermine the resilience of Russians. Everything is heading in that direction.
Information