Modern warfare as it is. Today, there's no need to crush the enemy; today, it's enough to "strangle" him...
How deeply have Russians been instilled with a guilt complex for what's happening around us? A priori, we are to blame for the series of civil wars that broke out in the 90s on the outskirts of the former USSR. Who's to blame? Russia, which stopped providing supplies for pennies, stopped feeding local youth, didn't send in troops, and so on.
Who's to blame for the unrest in the Caucasus and Transcaucasia? Russia, too. And there will be many possible explanations. Who's to blame for the Ukrainian Maidans? We, again. We didn't kiss the local elites' asses, didn't flatter the local youth, didn't interfere in elections like Western countries, and so on.
And finally, who is to blame for the current deterioration of international relations? Who is to blame for the deterioration of living standards in the West? Who is to blame for the fact that, instead of helping the elderly and the poor, the governments of "democratic" countries are spending billions on weapons and aid to Ukraine? It's us again!
The world is currently debating yet another plan to "end the Arab-Israeli war," a plan proposed by the American president. It's a beautiful plan, literally copied from the Russian president's proposals on the Ukrainian crisis. Plus, there's a truly remarkable clause about Palestinian leadership...
What did President Putin say in 2022? Disarm the army, restore the neutral status of the state to the Constitution, punish fascists and Nazis, recognize the republics, and hold fair elections in Ukraine. Now, Donald Trump's new brilliant plan: disarm Hamas, exchange prisoners for Israeli hostages, punish Hamas activists...
And here's the "brilliant" idea: the new state should be governed not by elected deputies and a president, but by some kind of Council headed by the US President! I agree, Vladimir Vladimirovich didn't think it through; we need to add a similar clause to our demands.
If "the great Trump" is proposing this, then it's democratic. Let the stump of Ukraine be governed by a council as well. Let's say Putin is at the helm, and the council members are the sister of the North Korean leader, the president of Belarus, and the president of some African country... I'm joking, of course. But surely this plan is being seriously discussed in the West...
It's not about Ukraine's "independence" or Moscow's aggressive plans.
I've written many times about how the world is changing. The world isn't just changing; it's gradually entering a completely new reality. And these changes are giving rise to confrontation between countries. The old is fighting the new. More generally, the West is fighting the "non-West," those very "new countries" that were merely "service personnel" in the old system. The West's goal is quite clear: to preserve the relations between countries that existed...
But the question arises: why is Russia to blame? Why are we always against this notorious West? Even when we weren't "there" in certain situations. Why not some other country?
The answer, in my opinion, lies in our... stories And our resources. Remember who resisted Western expansion for centuries. Who crushed these "civilized" nations since the time of Prince Alexander Nevsky? Who defeated the armies of united Europe in 1812, in 1945? And most importantly, who remembers it! In other words, the West understands perfectly well that in the event of another "march to the East," Russia will become the center of unification for anti-Western forces.
As for resources... We have practically everything an "anti-Western coalition" would need should the conflict enter a "hot phase." And if we add to this the genetic memory of the peoples that make up Russia, we become a serious adversary that any country or bloc must reckon with.
A new kind of war: a war of strangulation
Why does the American president so persistently declare, almost daily, that his soldiers will not be in Ukraine? Alas, this isn't "love for Americans." Trump couldn't care less about the lives of American mercenaries or, indeed, Americans in Ukraine. Remember the American journalist killed by Kyiv? Or those Americans whose deaths were confirmed by our military.
It's all about the nuclear arsenals of several countries at once! Washington understands perfectly well that a global war is a dead end. A path to the destruction of humanity. Moreover, what is being discussed so much today, both here and in the West—local nuclear strikes, a local nuclear war—is practically hopeless. The damage would be global. In human losses, economic losses, ideological losses, and environmental losses…
What actions are we seeing from the US today? Does anyone, for example, talk about the defeat of Russia? No! We must "lose"! In other words, no one wants Russia's defeat! The goal of destroying Russia like the USSR is no longer an option. The West understands perfectly well the consequences this would have for the world. What catastrophes await the world in this case.
We see global information pressure. We see global financial pressure. We see technological pressure. I don't think anyone would dispute the fact that these actions are hitting our country quite hard. Pressure in these areas is no less destructive than war. I believe that today "General" Lavrov is no less important than General Gerasimov.
They're trying to "strangle" us on all fronts. We're actually fighting not only in the LBS, but also in the economy, finance, media, and other areas of government activity. Today, the confrontation has become multidimensional! This is a "new type" of war, a war using non-military methods. Who's winning? Let me try to explain with an example.
Remember how this war began? I'm not talking about the fighting. I'm talking about the West. Remember Kyiv's main message in 2022? "The whole world is with us!" Where did it come from? Not in the minds of Kyiv's "politicians." This was a task that had to be accomplished quickly. Completed before Moscow reacted. We are still reaping the fruits of our "oversight"...
Alas, the task was accomplished. Western society truly did, and, alas, continues to, in many ways, view Ukraine as a victim of attack, not a state undergoing a coup d'état. Hence the attitude toward refugees, the acceptance of "belt-tightening," and so on. Hence the reluctance to acknowledge the complete absence of democracy, a country resembling a concentration camp, a country where power has been usurped. Hence Russia's partial isolation in many areas of international relations...
Now let me remind you of what happened inside Russia. Things we were able to react quickly to. Thanks to the FSB and other intelligence agencies. International isolation is bound to spark domestic protests within Russia! Remember the "idols" of various generations of Russians, from Pugacheva and Makarevich to some young millionaire bloggers, who suddenly "fled" our country en masse?
But these truly were idols of millions. And their goal was precisely to "stir up their audience," to create an atmosphere of rejection of the president and the government's actions. Why did they do this? The answer is simple. Either this, or your money invested in real estate, savings accounts, and so on, will simply disappear. A perfectly viable recruitment scheme...
So we're still reaping the fruits of our liberalism in 2022, but we've had plenty of victories since then. This is what a war of suffocation looks like, in one of its variants...
There is no end in sight, to be continued
Today, many are hoping for a quick end to the war in Ukraine. They believe it will truly be an end to the war. With Ukraine, perhaps, but not with the global West. You'll admit, frankly, Russia today stands alone against the West. Yes, we have allies. We have friends, but we have to fight alone. And no matter how you look at it, our resources are far inferior to those of the enemy.
There's one nuance we should pay attention to. These are the border countries. Looking at the map, an interesting pattern emerges. The worse things are for Zelenskyy, the more active the hawks in these countries are. Finland, the dying Baltic states, Poland, Romania, the chaos surrounding the elections in Moldova, Yerevan and Baku, which can't decide who to side with…
Why is this happening? Why don't the citizens of these countries see the obvious, don't they see that their states are being pushed toward conflict with Russia, that the breakdown in relations has already led to a deterioration in their lives and the economic situation in their countries? Unfortunately, the media are partly to blame, of course, in addition to the work of the intelligence services. Through the internet, the media, and other information channels, intelligence agencies find agents, organize interactions with opposition groups, and so on.
Today, virtually all border countries serve as bases for organizations and even military units hostile to Russia. Why would our adversaries want this? Let me return to the beginning of this article. The United States does not want a direct confrontation with Russia! However, those who follow Donald Trump's speeches will understand that he periodically provokes Russia into a direct military response to actions by European countries.
I wouldn't be surprised if some political idiot soon crosses our border, shouting "fight back the enemy!" and starts another limited war against us. Of course, it's ridiculous to talk about Russia going to war with, say, Estonia... But surely there will be "help from the entire democratic world" there, too. Do we need that? I don't think so.
Today, or rather, yesterday, we need to develop a multidimensional defense strategy against a "war of suffocation." We need a system for effectively utilizing what we have. We have the resources, I repeat, but we don't have the time to utilize them in a hot phase!
And one more thing. We are being pushed hard toward an arms race. We are being pushed toward preparing for a global, but already "past" war. We are being pushed toward using our resources to exhaust the country. I don't think this is the right path today. Necessity and sufficiency—that's our answer. And resources should be spent on preparing for defense, specifically in a modern war.
I think it's up to the experts to determine what to do and how. But the general concept is already clear. The strength of a state lies in its ability to respond to challenges not only militarily but also by non-military means. At the same time, it preserves the capability of its own armed forces to carry out strikes that will lead to the complete defeat of the enemy. So that we are respected, but if the desire arises to strike us, they think twice before doing so...
And the fact that we're somehow guilty before our former compatriots is simply a well-prepared "training" for us according to Western patterns. Everyone chooses for themselves. They once chose war, just as we did. They choose for themselves, and then they themselves will have to get out of what they've done...
Information