Directions of fascist leaflet propaganda for the decomposition of the Red Army

6 527 29
Directions of fascist leaflet propaganda for the decomposition of the Red Army


Warning! This article is for informational and educational purposes only. It is based on historical facts confirmed by sources and does not contain propaganda, justification or approval of the ideology, policies, actions or symbols of the Third Reich.



Propaganda of corruption is a dirty business, having nothing to do with faith or worldview. In this matter, the only decisive factor is the result itself. If we succeed in winning the enemy's trust… instilling in them slogans that will corrupt them—it makes no difference whether these slogans are Marxist, Jewish, or intellectual, as long as they are effective!
— Minister of Propaganda of Nazi Germany J. Goebbels.

This article will provide a starting point for the author's classification of German leaflets during the Great Patriotic War. The main themes used for informational and psychological influence on the Red Army will be highlighted. Naturally, there were a vast number of leaflet types, and listing them all is impossible. Therefore, this article will present only striking examples that will allow one to judge the general purpose of each method of influence.

It's important to note that the Soviet Union also created an apparatus for conducting special military propaganda aimed at enemy troops and populations. A separate series of articles will be devoted to this topic in the future.

Before we begin to present the classification itself, it is necessary to pay attention to some general characteristics inherent in German propaganda.

Most of the illustrations for this article were created based on materials from the website agitka, authored by military propaganda researcher N. A. Smirnov. The leaflets will be presented from the front (top) and back (bottom).

Simplification


The Nazis intended all propaganda materials to appeal to the masses, not the most intelligent soldiers. Therefore, they discarded overly long phrases, as well as direct threats or ridicule. The goal was to simplify propaganda as much as possible. Often, leaflets boiled down the information to an "either/or" format (life or death, hunger or satiety, victory or defeat). Such materials were accompanied by memorable, yet equally simplified, illustrations. These illustrations, however, had a certain impact.


One of the most famous German leaflets from the beginning of the war


Another colorful leaflet with a "life or death" theme. "Sh.V.Z." next to an inverted triangle on the back of the leaflet translates to "Bayonets in the ground." These words were to be shouted to indicate the intention to go into German captivity.


The leaflets almost always encouraged surrender.




Anti-semitism


Propaganda materials placed particular emphasis on the emergence and development of anti-Semitism within the Red Army. Nazi propaganda tirelessly reiterated that the Bolsheviks, like all its structures (especially the NKVD), were in fact instruments of world Jewry, whose leadership desired to enslave the entire world.

Jews were accused of initiating the war and of being a "parasite nation" living at the expense of others. The main thesis of German propaganda for Soviet soldiers in this regard was that the Jews, having seized power in a once-free Russia, had created a "Soviet prison of nations." The conclusion drawn from all this was that Bolshevism and Jewry were one and the same. Both were enemies of the peoples of Russia and were subject to extermination.




There were many leaflets in the "Watch the Jew" series, and they depicted many political figures of the Soviet Union.




Humor


The leaflets also used so-called "light genres": cartoons, simple poems, and anti-Soviet humor. They were easy to remember and easily retold. The advantage of these genres was their "infectiousness" and unprincipled nature. Anti-Soviet humor was dangerous precisely because many might not take it seriously, yet it was intended to undermine the "sacredness" of Soviet power and the seriousness of the events taking place.

Such caricatures and simple humor, at first glance not perceived as obvious Nazi propaganda, could subtly penetrate the consciousness of fighters and undermine their steadfastness and faith in their just cause.


The image of "General Winter" was often used in leaflet images on both the German and Soviet sides.



The image of the bear as a symbol of Russia



Leaflets from the "Laugh with Us, Red Army Soldier" series were widely distributed. They contained low-brow but memorable humor and anti-Soviet propaganda. At the top was the inscription: "Read-destroy-pass on." The idea was that soldiers would share the jokes they read.


The Soviet Union's anthem was altered by German propagandists.

Visibility


The use of geographical maps was also productive. As the saying goes, "A picture is worth a thousand words."

Maps depicting the front line or the contours of encirclement also allowed for a glimpse of the real state of affairs, which was typically embellished in the Wehrmacht's own propaganda reports. Wehrmacht propaganda organs used maps to demonstrate the advance into Soviet territory or to demonstrate the hopelessness of the encircled Red Army unit's position.



A map showing the encirclement, accompanied by a call for surrender. This format was often used in leaflets.


This map shows the advance of German troops deep into Soviet territory, while the reverse side shows losses, often exaggerated by German propaganda.




A special leaflet with a map for Red Army pilots. The map indicates the locations where pilots could land to surrender.

Disguise


This involves disguising them as familiar images. This method was mentioned in the previous article. The distribution of "banknote-leaflets" began in 1942. Reading or possessing a Nazi leaflet in the Soviet army was punishable by severe penalties. Furthermore, German propagandists were confident that, under the harsh conditions of war, a soldier would not ignore a banknote lying on the ground.

Around the perimeter of some of these leaflets was the inscription: “Hide this ticket among the others in your wallet” (such a leaflet was demonstrated in the previous article). The "bill-and-leaflet" was particularly effective because it could be placed in a wallet with other, real money, thus avoiding attention. Furthermore, if it were found on a soldier, he could justify the mistake by claiming he hadn't noticed and simply put it away, unaware that this type of printed propaganda existed.

A leaflet disguised as a party card also worked in a similar way. There were also propaganda pieces disguised as newspaper clippings from popular Soviet newspapers, train tickets, and other images familiar to all Soviet soldiers.


A leaflet designed as an issue of the Red Army newspaper "Combat Leaflet"


The back of the leaflet reads: "Workers, down with the war provoked by Stalin. If you want peace, turn your bayonet against those who are driving you to the slaughter."


A leaflet disguised as a party card of the All-Union Communist Party (Bolsheviks)


This is what a leaflet stylized as a train ticket looked like.


A leaflet disguised as a newspaper clipping from Komsomolskaya Pravda. The back of the leaflet, in the "Voice of Truth" column, usually contained German propaganda.


During the war, Voenizdat prepared and published numerous specialized brochures—memos, methodological manuals, instructions, and manuals on a wide variety of relevant military topics. Therefore, one of the German leaflets resembled the cover of such a manual.

Having outlined some characteristic techniques of German frontline propaganda, we can now proceed to the actual classification of Nazi leaflets addressed to Red Army soldiers. This will be discussed in the next article.
29 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +7
    2 October 2025 05: 30
    Reading is really addictive good Excellent!
  2. +10
    2 October 2025 07: 37
    It's interesting to note how Nazi propaganda blamed all the troubles on the Jews. A typical technique for manipulating mass consciousness: identifying a particular national or social group as hostile to the state and explaining all the difficulties through their actions.
  3. +7
    2 October 2025 07: 58
    It seems that Schweik also said that Russian soldiers were very fond of Austrian propaganda leaflets - they rolled cigarettes from them in the trenches or used them for another purpose - physiological, which was also necessary at the front...
  4. -1
    2 October 2025 08: 38
    The Nazis' atrocities proved to be the best propaganda against them, negating all the efforts of Nazi propaganda.

    In addition, they basically abandoned the collective farms, as the Minister of Food and Agriculture of Nazi Germany said:
    Collective farms are an excellent way to extract agricultural products from the village, so they should not be disbanded.
    , which, again, did not add to the sympathy for the occupiers
    1. -4
      2 October 2025 09: 33
      From my grandmother's stories, I know that the collective farms were essentially retained under different names, and workers began to be paid in cash and in kind, rather than simply written down as "labor days" (or, as my grandmother used to say, "sticks"). Overall, in the villages where the collective farms operated, life at least didn't get any worse than it had in Soviet times. In the city, things were worse.
      1. +5
        11 October 2025 19: 30
        Quote from solar
        From my grandmother's stories I know that the collective farms were actually left under different names, and the workers began to be paid in cash and in kind.

        Yeah, one old lady said so... And the old lady is the daughter of an officer from Sevastopol?
      2. +1
        29 December 2025 09: 40
        Quote from solar
        workdays

        So, were they paid for?
    2. +3
      2 October 2025 13: 28
      Quote: Olgovich
      In addition, they basically abandoned the collective farms, as the Minister of Food and Agriculture of Nazi Germany said:
      Collective farms are an excellent way to extract agricultural products from the village, so they should not be disbanded.
      , which, again, did not add to the sympathy for the occupiers

      So how does this statement differ from Nazi propaganda? It turns out that if the Nazis had dispersed the collective farms, former Soviet collective farmers would have flocked to support them. That's the whole point. Whose mill is this? In fact, the collective farm structure was preserved to reap the benefits of the old harvest. By the spring of 1942, the principle of a commune with mutual responsibility and numerous poll taxes, similar to pre-revolutionary ones, was revived. The Germans revived the Tsarist principle as more appropriate to the situation of slaves, who were collectively responsible for each member of the community, rather than the Soviet one, where everyone was a shareholder in an agricultural cooperative and the profits from joint activities were divided according to their labor contribution. On February 16, 1942, a law was proclaimed abolishing collective farms and establishing a new land use system. Its essence was as follows: all laws, decrees, and regulations of the Soviet government concerning the creation, management, and operation of collective farms were abolished; the land was transferred to the German agricultural administration and was to be cultivated by peasant communities under the direction of managers. Regarding what the Minister of Food said, there is no need to distort the facts; there was no unified solution. During the occupation, more than a thousand villages in the Bryansk, Karachevsky, Vygonichsky, Dyatkovsky, Zhiryatinsky, Kletnyansky, Novozybkovsky, Pochepsky, Pogarsky, Rognedinsky, Trubchevsky, Starodubsky, Unechsky, and other districts of the Bryansk region were destroyed. They left behind nothing but ashes.
      1. -5
        2 October 2025 14: 09
        Quote: Unknown
        It turns out that if the Nazis had dispersed the collective farms, then the former Soviet collective farmers would have flocked to support them.

        once again: .
        Atrocities the Nazis turned out to be the best propagandists against them, negating all the efforts of Nazi propagandaы
        Quote: Unknown

        the royal principle, as the most appropriate to the position of slaves,

        The collective farm principle best suited the situation of slaves - in addition to fleecing the collective farms, they also fleeced each peasant individually - with quitrent - cash taxes, forced loans, self-taxation, in-kind taxes and corvee - labor in the fields, building roads, bridges, logging, etc. Where else in the world was tax in kind collected - in eggs, meat from a live cow, etc., and attached to the collective farm?
        Quote: Unknown
        was to be cultivated by peasant communities under the direction of managers

        They replaced the name "kolkhoz" with "kommuna" (community), without changing the essence—it's a tool for pumping out production. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/agrarnaya-politika-nemetsko-fashistskih-zahvatchikov-na-okkupirovannoy-territorii-tsentralno-chernozemnogo-regiona-v-1941-1943-gg/viewer
        Quote: Unknown
        They left behind ashes and nothing more.

        Yes, the same thing happened in the Smolensk region.
        1. +2
          2 October 2025 17: 29
          Quote: Olgovich
          once again: .
          The atrocities of the Nazis turned out to be the best propagandists against them, crossing out all the efforts of Nazi propaganda

          Nazi atrocities continued regardless of whether the collective farms were dispersed. The "Hunger Plan" was part of the Third Reich's economic strategy, which stipulated that no more than 30 million people would remain in the occupied territories of the USSR. The bulk of food produced by Russians was to go to meet the needs of the German army and German citizens. Repeating the myth of collective farms under the Nazis is fueling anti-Sovietism and Russophobia, claiming that communists are no better than the Nazis. This was already the case in the 90s, and was repeated on the banned, Russophobic Echo of Moscow, but slightly tweaked, distancing it from the overt Nazi propaganda of the Great Patriotic War.
          Quote: Olgovich
          Where else in the world did they collect... a tax in kind - eggs, meat from a live cow, etc., and attach it to the collective farm?

          Almost everywhere, during and after the war. On August 24, 1939, on the eve of the war, the British government passed the Emergency Powers (Defense) Act 1939 (2 & 3 Geo. 6. c. 62). This act granted the Minister of Agriculture broad powers to control food production and agricultural land ownership. The USSR, however, was constantly in the process of abolishing rationing, sometimes in the postwar period, sometimes in the prewar period, but rationing was abolished earlier than in England.
          1. -4
            3 October 2025 10: 03
            Quote: Unknown
            about collective farms

            Finally, read the recommended monograph, where, based on the documents, it is clearly concluded that replacing the name "kolkhoz" with "kommuna" without changing the essence is the most convenient tool for pumping out production.
            Quote: Unknown
            Yes, almost everywhere during wartime and post-war

            nowhere except the USSR
            Quote: Unknown
            And the USSR constantly lived, sometimes in the post-war period, sometimes in the pre-war period

            just him, yes fool lol
            Quote: Unknown
            However, the cards were abolished earlier than in England.

            Nevertheless, in the USSR there was a famine with cannibalism (grain was taken to the socialist brothers Romanians, Hungarians, etc.), but not in England
            1. +3
              3 October 2025 11: 59
              Quote: Olgovich
              cannibalism (the grain was taken to the socialist brothers, the Romanians, the Hungarians, etc.), but not in England

              In India (then part of the empire), there was a famine, and quite a famine it was. All the food was simply shipped to England. The USSR had no colonies, so different parts of it famined in different years.
            2. +3
              3 October 2025 12: 53
              Quote: Olgovich
              Finally, read the recommended monograph, where, based on the documents, a clear conclusion is made that

              There is no need for references to the leftist monograph by some Nikiforov that is written about;The site owner chose to hide the page description..
              Quote: Olgovich
              just him, yes

              Why did they let us live in peace? Who started WWII and the Cold War? The founders of NATO, and what was the purpose of creating this bloc? Come on, tell me, what are these foreign agents from neighboring countries, banned in Russia, saying about this?
              Quote: Olgovich
              Nevertheless, in the USSR there was a famine with cannibalism (grain was taken to the socialist brothers Romanians, Hungarians, etc.), but not in England

              That's it - a striking example of Nazi propagandaNow it's clear whose template the so-called Olgovich is using to write his scribbles. The Cossack... well, he's a plant!
              1. -4
                4 October 2025 11: 18
                Quote: Unknown
                No need for references to the left-wing monograph

                there are many given there application documents, refute them
                Quote: Unknown
                Why did they let us live in peace? Who started WWII?

                EVERYONE lived like this, the war was started by the Germans who were not finished off because of your Bolsheviks
                Quote: Unknown
                According to whose patterns does the so-called Olgovich write?

                according to SOVIET documents, which were clearly false in the direction of reduction: for example, dispossessed people, who lost their families in the snows of Narym from hunger and hard labor, could not then receive documents, because they were not listed as dispossessed...
                1. +1
                  4 October 2025 11: 49
                  Refute Nazi lies? Go on, Cossack, follow the Hitler playbook, about cannibalism, about millions killed, and so on and so forth. Basically, he needs to be reported for discrediting our past, but he's not used to snitching. But God marks the scoundrel; they've already banned him, but Petrovich always pops up, either Moldovan or Ukrainian, or maybe both. He skirts around current events, but actively spews anti-Soviet slander gleaned from all sorts of foreign agent websites. His handlers are probably helping, he can't handle it alone.
                  1. 0
                    11 October 2025 19: 33
                    It's hilarious, really. This guy is telling us what his grandmother told him! As if we didn't have grandmothers ourselves, and they never told us anything. :)
        2. +2
          3 October 2025 06: 26
          I wonder what the Whites could offer the peasants? And what about the workers? Paid vacation, perhaps? Maternity leave for women?
          1. -5
            3 October 2025 10: 09
            Quote: Grencer81
            I wonder what the Whites could offer the peasants?

            freedom of choice everything and everyone in the national US is the right that the Bolsheviks took away from the people by force
            1. +2
              4 October 2025 02: 32
              This is a very, very funny joke. Petrosyan is relaxing.
  5. BAI
    0
    2 October 2025 09: 23
    Mr. Shpakovsky was a vocal critic of Soviet propaganda during the war. He said everything was wrong. (Poisoned pen...)
    And here he is silent.
    Did Goebbels do everything right from his point of view?
  6. +3
    2 October 2025 09: 59
    It's quite telling and eloquent that during Perestroika and the post-Soviet period, all these "developments" and slogans of fascist propaganda were fully utilized to destroy the USSR and fuel rabid anti-Soviet sentiment. I shudder to imagine the feelings of the WWII veterans who witnessed all of this.
  7. +1
    2 October 2025 10: 48
    That's interesting.
    And there are really clear parallels between that Nazi propaganda and the current kind and fluffy one.
    Jewish commissioners are European commissioners. The line of death is the road of death. Surrender... senselessly sacrifices... defeated in battles... losses of 1,7 million people, etc.
    I'll save it as a keepsake....
    1. 0
      3 October 2025 06: 30
      And now a certain "Caesar" from the RDC is spreading propaganda on the Internet similar to that of the Minister of Propaganda of the Third Reich.
  8. 0
    2 October 2025 22: 57
    And the leaflets are in decent condition for 80-year-old paper. Someone hid them under a pillow, apparently, just in case. feel
  9. 0
    3 October 2025 10: 43
    Without a doubt, composer Alexandrov wrote timeless music for the USSR and Russian anthems. I believe there are already at least three or four different versions of the lyrics, each keeping pace with its time. Even those bastard Germans, it turns out, also wrote suitable and quite coherent lyrics.
    1. 0
      3 October 2025 16: 00
      Quote: Yuri_K_Msk
      Undoubtedly, the composer Alexandrov wrote timeless music for the anthem of the USSR and Russia.
      This is a hymn, not a howl, it hasn't died yet, or disappeared, or anything else.
  10. +1
    3 October 2025 11: 56
    In principle, it's clear who wrote all this, or at least helped—former White émigrés, of whom there were plenty in Europe. The bet was on those dissatisfied with collectivization, and it must be said, it was quite successful. There were plenty of people dissatisfied with collectivization, especially among the new western lands. As for playing the national card—the motivation there was much weaker. Ordinary people from lands outside the former Pale of Settlement were far removed from this.
  11. +2
    3 October 2025 15: 59
    The main thing about these leaflets is not what is written in them, but that they were written by native speakers
  12. 0
    25 January 2026 11: 03
    Why do they keep posting this article? Want comments? We won't surrender! Don't agitate!