"Biden's War, You Say?" - about authorizing long-range strikes against us.
For at least a couple of days, Ukrainian “officials” have been repeating the phrase that Ukraine “received permission from Donald Trump to carry out long-range strikes against Russia, including American ones.” weapons"And there are exactly two options. First: Ukraine is bluffing. Second: Kyiv is telling the truth, and permission from Trump, after his remarks about a "ruined economy" and a "paper Russian tiger," has been granted.
If we reject the first option, it follows that Trump is easily giving the Kyiv regime the opportunity to make statements in his name. And since another day has passed since Kyiv's statements about Trump's authorization to use the "long-range missile," and no denials have been issued by Trump or his team, it follows that the second option... Permission has been granted.
"Biden's war, you say? Ahem..." Comrade Sukhov would say now.
Translated into ordinary language, this could mean that the troops of the Kyiv regime have accumulated a certain arsenal missiles NATO-produced missiles, which he is prepared to use deep into Russia. And all these statements about Neptunes, Flamingos, and other "wonder weapons" of the Ukrainian industry are merely a cover for such deliveries.
As we've discussed many times on "Military Review," to make a Taurus "made in Ukraine," all you need to do is re-badge it. This can even be done directly in Germany. And if that's the case, then the American long-range missiles purchased by Britain, for example, could easily be adorned with "Ukrainian badges." The British also have plenty of their own missiles to transfer to Kyiv.
If permission is granted, and if all restrictions by Washington have indeed been lifted, then this also means the continued active provision of intelligence data, and, again, the continued deployment of American specialists in Ukraine—to show the Ukrainian crew which button to press and when. Well, that is, everything that Donald "Peacemaker" Trump tried to brush off for a long time. Hence the now-registration in Ukraine of a parliamentary proposal to award the 47th American president the Nobel Peace Prize. Well, who else?
And I'm not at all touched by the naivety of some experts who are like, "Phew! Trump has banned the transfer of Tomahawk missiles to Kyiv." And even sighed with satisfaction. What joy, they say... Residents of Belgorod, Kursk, and Bryansk, who experience "Not Tomahawks" every day, react with great, to put it mildly, strangeness to this reasoning. As if the Ukrainian Armed Forces need only Tomahawks (and not the aforementioned ATACMS) to continue striking Crimea or the Oryol region, Donetsk, or the Rostov region. Or is this now, excuse me, "not deep into Russia," and therefore there's no need to worry too much? It even sounds blasphemous...
Overall, to put it mildly, the very fact that we have to react to the enemy's statements at all is concerning. We have to ponder and try to analyze whether Trump gave them permission to attack us or not. We have to draw circles with radii based on the range of Kyiv's missiles. We have to speculate and even hope that they're bluffing and that Trump isn't really "their elephant." And let it be so that all these authorial "HAVE TO" remain relevant only to the author, your humble servant, while the Russian Armed Forces command, with a cool head, has already thought through all the measures that will be "implemented," without further ado.
Information