The only "plot" is Smith & Wesson revolvers.

8 340 60
The only "plot" is Smith & Wesson revolvers.
The Smith & Wesson .44 caliber, single-action, six-shot revolver, known in Russia as the "4,2-line Smith & Wesson Model I revolver." Barrel length: 167 mm. Muzzle velocity: 210 m/sec. Penetration: penetrates 3,65-inch pine boards at 25 paces; 2,75 at 50 paces; and 1 25 mm board at 100 paces. Rate of fire: 6 shots in 10 seconds. Manufactured by the Tula Arms Factory.


"And God saw that it was good."
Genesis 1:10

History weapons. At one point, "Military Review" already covered Smith & Wesson revolvers, as well as when, how, by whom, and under what circumstances this company was founded. But... we've never shown ALL the revolvers produced by this company or its other imitators. Admittedly, it should be noted that it's probably impossible to show "all" the revolvers. There were just too many of them. But... a significant portion of them—why not?! So today, lovers of vintage revolvers will be able to sip their coffee and admire their entire arsenal. Admittedly, the very first Smith & Wessons won't be in our gallery. And that's because the collection was already quite large. Instead, we'll start with perhaps the most widely produced and largest series of revolvers, the so-called "Russian model." Incidentally, I've already written here about how this revolver came to be used by the Russian Imperial Army. It's a long time ago, but you can find it. So let's start right with the very first model of the Smith & Wesson revolver, which entered service with our army in 1871.




Model 1874 Model II revolver. Barrel length: 178 mm. Manufactured by Smith & Wesson Arms Factory, Springfield, USA.


A Model III revolver from 1880. Barrel length: 203 mm. Manufactured by Ludwig Loewe in Germany. The "heel" on the grip and the "spur" on the trigger guard are the main distinguishing features of Russian revolvers.


This is how they all unloaded. Revolver "III model" 1880.


Civilian model. The grips have ivory grips, and the body is nickel-plated. Manufactured by "Smith & Wesson Arms Factory, Springfield, USA. Russian model." (Text in English)

For officers of the Russian Imperial Army, a revolver of the "officer's type, triple action" was approved, since its hammer also had an automatic safety cocking mechanism.


The Smith & Wesson "Frontier" revolver. The Russian army officer's revolver looked almost identical.


The Mexicans were so taken with Smith & Wesson revolvers that they began producing them themselves. This is a Type III revolver in Russian caliber .44-45 with a 127mm barrel.


The Smith & Wesson Model 3, American 2nd Model, features a 203mm barrel. Its distinguishing feature is the notch in the hammer head. This notch was devised by General Orlov for a Russian contract and was intended to improve safety by preventing the revolver from closing when the hammer is pulled. The notch was adopted by Smith & Wesson. The buttstock mount is clearly visible on the grip. This model is also called the "three screw" because of the three screws that hold the inspection and lubrication plate in place. Future models will have only two. Caliber: .44 American. Only 200 .44 Henry rimfire pistols were produced for the civilian market. The Russian Army purchased just over 41,000 .44 Russian caliber pistols, while approximately 13,200 American and Russian caliber pistols were sold on the civilian market. It differed from the revolvers of the Russian army mainly by the absence of a protrusion on the handle, which helped to better hold it in the hand.


Scoffield revolver, 1873 model

Smith & Wesson revolvers were also produced by Scofield. The first model was manufactured between 1873 and 1875, with 3035 units produced. The second model was produced in 1876 and 1877, with 5934 units produced in .45 S&W caliber. The first model was serialized from 1 to 3035. The US Department of Defense ordered and purchased the entire batch for the army. These revolvers differed from the basic model in that they had a top-mounted frame. Almost all of the Scofield revolvers were purchased in the late 19th century by the Bannerman Company and restored (given a blue tint, re-stamped, and shortened) so they could be resold on the civilian market, including to the Wells Fargo postal company.


Scoffield frame lock


The Smith & Wesson Model 1 revolver, manufactured by Scoffield for the U.S. Army.


The Smith & Wesson 2nd Model revolver, manufactured by Scoffield


Smith & Wesson 3-Model "Second Type" or "Old Model." Manufactured from 1873 to 1878, chambered for the .44 cartridge. A total of 85,200 "Old Models" were produced. Some of these, probably fewer than 4000, were chambered for the .44 ("Henry") rimfire cartridge or factory-converted to that caliber. The Turkish Army ordered 3000 of these rimfire revolvers, and later another 5000 of the Third Type ("New Model") revolvers with a shorter barrel (6,5 inches). The barrel length was 178 mm. It was a virtually exact copy of the revolver used by the Russian Imperial Army.


A revolver from Orbea Hermanos. This revolver is a Spanish copy of the Smith & Wesson 44 double-action Model 1. It was produced under the name "EUSKARO" and was likely manufactured in the early 20th century.


Smith & Wesson Frontier revolver. Made in Spain circa 1880. 44 Russian caliber. The top of the barrel is inscribed "Fa DE ORBEA HERMANOS EIBAR SPAIN." The barrel is 127 mm long. The revolver is beautifully inlaid with gold and silver scrolls on the frame, barrel, and trigger guard. Ivory grips

Forehand & Wadsworth also produced Smith & Wesson revolvers, which looked like the fruit of a forbidden love between an American Smith & Wesson revolver with a complicated lock and a Colt revolver. The company is little known, but it produced high-quality weapons. It so happened that each of these two men, Forehand and Wadsworth, married the daughters of the famous gunsmith Ethan Allen, and in 1865 they joined the firm, which was renamed Ethan Allen & Co. In 1871, after Ethan Allen's death, the company became Forehand & Wadsworth. Single-action revolvers were produced by this firm from the mid-1870s to the 1880s and were known for their high quality.


Forehand & Wadsworth, 1874. Less than 2000 of all versions produced. It was a very strange revolver!


The same revolver. Right view


Why is it weird? That's why. Look how it unfolds for reloading...


Old Forehand & Wadsworth model single-action army revolver, Russian .44 cartridge, 192 mm barrel, manufactured in 1875. The cylinder could be easily removed for reloading.


And this is also Abadi's door!


Garat & Anitua 1915 revolver chambered for .455 cartridge

A Spanish copy of the Smith & Wesson 3rd Model revolver chambered for the .44 Russian cartridge appeared in 1881. Like the original, this revolver has a grip that covers the entire left side of the frame. This revolver was produced by Garat y Anitua of Eibar and other Spanish manufacturers in .44 Russian and .45 Long Colt calibers. In 1915-1916, the British Army experienced a severe shortage of revolvers. To fill this gap, the British ordered approximately 100,000 of these revolvers from Spain, but in the .455 Webley caliber, which was common in the British army. The Spanish could easily and quickly convert the barrels and cylinder chambers to the British caliber. At the same time, the British ordered 107,000 New Service revolvers of the same caliber from Colt. To fill this massive order, the Colt factory had to turn to the Remington Arms Co., which manufactured some of these revolvers under government control. They were also required to supply the British with civilian versions of this revolver (the 1909 modification). After the war, a large number of these revolvers were returned to Canada.


Revolver rifle chambered for .320

Between 1879 and 1887, Smith & Wesson produced only 977 of these rifles, and by 1890, this model was removed from the catalog. It was produced only in .320 S&W. The revolver was available in blued or nickel-plated finishes, with barrel lengths of 16, 18, or 20 inches (406, 457, or 508 mm). Each gun was equipped with a red hard rubber fore-end and grip. The stock was made of walnut and had a black hard rubber buttplate. All stocks had a screw hole in the fore-end for mounting a telescopic sight.


The first hammerless Smith & Wesson model. This revolver was produced in 1887 in a limited run of 5125. Caliber: .38 S&W. The cylinder was easily removed for unloading and cleaning.


The Lemon Press .38 caliber hammerless revolver features a safety mechanism and a grip safety.

Smith & Wesson produced five different .38 caliber models and three .32 caliber models. However, the differences between them are minor. These revolvers were the last in the swing-cylinder series, appearing immediately before the "Hand-Loading" model with a sliding cylinder. Production began in 1886, and the last of these revolvers left the factory in 1940, many years after production resumed. The third model was introduced in 1890 under serial number 42484 and was produced until 1898. Some revolvers had 152 mm (6 in) barrels, but others had 50,8 mm (2 in) barrels, which were called the "bicycle model."

From a technical standpoint, these revolvers are interesting because they used an inertia-type firing pin developed by Joe Wesson, son of Daniel Wesson. This pin was mounted in the frame and spring-loaded. It could only strike the primer after receiving sufficient force from the hammer, which transferred the momentum from the hammer to the pin itself. When the hidden hammer pressed against the pin, the pin did not protrude beyond the frame.


The Hand Ejector Revolver, Model 1. A double-action, hand-extractor revolver in .32 caliber. Smith & Wesson's first swing-out cylinder revolver. 19,712 were produced between 1896 and 1903.


Smith & Wesson 1917 .45ACP


Smith & Wesson 1st Model New Century with English markings chambered for .455


Smith & Wesson Model 64. A military and police revolver made of stainless steel with a six-shot cylinder chambered for the .38 Special cartridge. The Model 65 was produced from 1972 until 2004-2005. Beginning in 1980, the company also produced revolvers chambered for the .357 Magnum cartridge with a "medium-large" frame ("L-frame"), which better handled the high stresses of firing a large-caliber revolver. The revolver with a large stainless steel frame was called the Model 686. Next to it is a speedloader.


The same revolver in a holster

P.S. The author and site administration would like to thank Allen Dobress for permission to use his photographs, which were presented in this material.
60 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +3
    30 September 2025 04: 42
    Thanks for the quality article. hi I'm impressed by the illustrations, especially the revolver rifle... I have no idea how to shoot it without a buttstock.
    1. +3
      30 September 2025 05: 10
      Quote: Hunter 2
      I have no idea how to shoot it without a buttstock.

      To do this you have to be crazy or a clown... Or both...
      1. +2
        30 September 2025 06: 06
        Quote: Puncher
        Quote: Hunter 2
        I have no idea how to shoot it without a buttstock.

        To do this you have to be crazy or a clown... Or both...

        If you want to live, you'll have to stretch yourself even further (c)lol
      2. +1
        30 September 2025 09: 51
        No, you have to be Jack Nicholson to do that. bully
    2. +1
      30 September 2025 06: 26
      Quote: Hunter 2
      I have no idea how to shoot it without a buttstock.
      It has a wooden forend, although it would certainly be more interesting with a buttstock.
    3. +3
      30 September 2025 07: 05
      Quote: Hunter 2
      The question is, how do you shoot it without a buttstock?

      That's how it was attached to it. They just removed it for the photo, otherwise the barrel wouldn't have fit.
      1. +3
        30 September 2025 11: 48
        Quote: kalibr
        That's how it was attached to it. They just removed it for the photo, otherwise the barrel wouldn't have fit.
        Why didn't revolver-type rifles catch on? They're much simpler and more reliable than magazine-fed ones...
        1. +3
          30 September 2025 12: 46
          Quote: Luminman
          Why didn't revolver-type rifles catch on?

          What about gas leakage between the barrel and cylinder? And if you make cartridges like the Nagant, then... the trigger pull will be very heavy.
          1. 0
            30 September 2025 21: 12
            That's right. As far as I remember, the only carbines produced in any significant quantity were the Remington 1858 (estimates range from 1000 to 1800) and Colt 1855 (around 5000) percussion caps, the Pieper 1893 (350 to 50 for Mexico) chambered for the 8mm Pieper Carbine cartridge with a cylinder sliding onto the barrel and a unique cartridge case, a design that Nagant "borrowed" (not entirely legally) from Pieper for its revolver, and the Nagant carbine with a fixed stock for the Border Guard Corps (estimates vary, from 200 to 1000 units), two of which are on permanent display at the Tula Museum of Arms, and one is definitely in the collection of the St. Petersburg Artillery Museum. Currently, revolver carbines and smoothbore guns are produced by the Brazilian-American concern Taurus (including under the "daughter" brand Rossi), TsKIB SOO (the 20-gauge shotgun MTs-255 (mass produced in 2000-2007, then only individually by order, also offered in 12, 32 and .410 calibers) and the MTs-502 carbine for .22LR cartridges), Italian Uberti and Pietta (copies of American cap carbines and variations on the theme, including carbine versions of revolvers "from the Wild West era" for a unitary cartridge). Furthermore, the Italian company Mateba offered a carbine version of its unusual automatic revolvers called the Griffon, while the Czech company Alfa-Proj offered various versions of its revolvers in calibers ranging from .22LR to .357 Mag, with extended barrels and fixed stocks. And several years ago, TsNIITochMash exhibited carbine versions of revolvers chambered for 9x39 and 12.7 calibers, specially designed for this purpose, at the "Army" exhibition.
            1. 0
              30 September 2025 21: 22
              Oh, right, I forgot. In 2014, the American-made Crye Precision Six12 modular revolver shotgun was introduced. It could be used on its own with a stock or just a pistol grip, or mounted on a Picatinny rail under the barrel of a rifle, carbine, or assault rifle. But nothing has been heard about it in a while. Maybe it didn't take off.
            2. 0
              30 September 2025 21: 38
              Sorry, the Pieper 1893 carbine was produced in limited quantities of 350 to 500 units. Typo.
            3. 0
              1 October 2025 06: 39
              Quote: Ironal
              capsule,

              capsule
              Russian spelling dictionary
              Noun, masculine gender, 2nd declension
              nominative case
              Great Dictionary of Russian language
              A cap containing a shock-igniting explosive.
              used in combat cartridges, distance tubes, etc. to ignite the charge.
              Root words
              Capsule
              Capsule gun. Capsule pistol.
              Even an old woman can make mistakes, eh?
              1. +1
                1 October 2025 10: 35
                Yes, thanks for noticing. I was writing this on my phone, and autocorrect was enabled, so the phone automatically swapped capsules. I've already corrected that in the dictionary settings. Thanks again.
        2. +2
          30 September 2025 14: 54
          Quote: Luminman
          Why didn't revolver-type rifles catch on?

          Perhaps because the power of such rifles is much lower?
    4. +2
      30 September 2025 10: 19
      Shoot? Just by eye, of course. That's obviously why so few were produced.
  2. +2
    30 September 2025 06: 24
    Quote: Vyacheslav Shpakovsky
    The handle has linings made of ivory
    Overlays!
  3. +1
    30 September 2025 07: 58
    I had a Smith & Wesson like this.
    1. +4
      30 September 2025 08: 57
      The plastic finish on the handle was something unheard of at the time and very cool!
  4. +1
    30 September 2025 08: 55
    As usual, Mr. Shpakovsky published an illiterate article riddled with errors. I'll comment in detail later. But my favorite part was "Smith & Wesson revolvers were also manufactured by Scofield"!!!
    There never was a Scofield company. It was a US Army major named George Schofield (he had German roots, hence the surname's pronunciation with a "Sh") who devised an improved revolver frame locking system. It was with his system that the US Army commissioned the Smith & Wesson (Russian Model No. 3) revolver, chambered in .45 caliber, unlike the Russian version. Smith & Wesson developed the .45 Schofield cartridge, also known as the .45 S&W, specifically for these revolvers, known as the Smith & Wesson Schofield.
    So, "congratulations on lying."
    And finally study the GOST for weapons, otherwise in your article a revolver carbine is sometimes called a 'shotgun', sometimes a 'rifle', although it is neither one nor the other.
    There will be a detailed analysis of the bloopers later.
    1. +1
      30 September 2025 11: 18
      Quote: Ironal
      So, "congratulations on lying."

      Various sources, dear Alexander. That's all. Yours are apparently more comprehensive. For my material, I took information from A. Dobress.
      1. +1
        30 September 2025 12: 10
        For my material I took information from A. Dobress.

        It's been discussed many times that an uncritical approach to sources and copying the first ones that come along, like Dobres, is a bad habit that leads to the production of obvious absurdities. But you, Vyacheslav Alekseevich, persist in your approach, which is why you've even introduced certain figures into the revolver's history who never existed, such as a certain "General Orlov." In fact, it was General Gorlov, and he "invented" not the notch, but the comb. When the gun wasn't fully locked, the hammer would rest against the comb and not reach the cartridge's primer.
        1. +1
          30 September 2025 12: 19
          Quote: Nikname2025
          leading to the production of obvious absurdities.

          But this gives you the opportunity to show off your erudition. I simply don't have the time to check all the "eagles" and "throaters." And besides... why should I do that when I know for a fact that you'll correct any errors? And people will be interested in reading not only the text itself (by the way, 90% of it is more than enough!), but also the comments?! That's great!
          1. +2
            30 September 2025 12: 24
            My erudition has absolutely nothing to do with it. Although it sometimes helped you when writing some of your books. But in this case, the issue isn't erudition, but the quality of the information the audience receives.
            1. 0
              30 September 2025 12: 25
              Quote: Nikname2025
              Although she sometimes helped you when writing some of your books.

              Yes, and what's more, a book thanking you for your help is waiting for you on my bookshelf. Right away... right away! As for quality, in my opinion, 100% quality is simply unattainable.
              1. -1
                30 September 2025 12: 31
                100% quality is generally unattainable

                But it's highly desirable to strive for this. Although, to be fair, I must say that today's audience doesn't inspire perfectionism.
                1. +1
                  30 September 2025 12: 48
                  Quote: Nikname2025
                  But it is highly desirable to strive for this.

                  Absolutely. But writing popular content doesn't require much.
                2. +1
                  30 September 2025 19: 54
                  Good evening!!! So, in what publication can one appreciate your encyclopedic knowledge???
                  1. +2
                    2 October 2025 06: 40
                    Quote: d ^ Amir
                    Good evening!!! So, in what publication can one appreciate your encyclopedic knowledge???

                    Here in this one:
                    1. +1
                      2 October 2025 09: 25
                      Thank you! hi I'll definitely find it and read it
                      1. 0
                        2 October 2025 09: 56
                        Quote: d ^ Amir
                        I'll definitely find it and read it

                        Keep in mind. This is the second book. The first part was "Revolvers and Pistols." An e-book, "Reading the Middle Ages," was also just released. Maybe you'll find it interesting.
                      2. +1
                        2 October 2025 09: 58
                        good good good Thank you!!! Oh-hhhhhh where is the time???? Thank you very much for the tip hi
          2. +2
            1 October 2025 20: 36
            Quote: kalibr
            Quote: Nikname2025
            leading to the production of obvious absurdities.

            But this gives you the opportunity to show off my erudition. I simply don't have the time to check all the "eagles" and "throaters." And besides... why should I do that when I know with absolute certainty that you will correct any possible errors?!
            Just a joke ...
            - Vovochka, why do you make so many mistakes in your tests? Am I such a bad teacher?
            -- Marya Ivanovna, you are an excellent teacher, and I make mistakes on purpose so that you have work to correct them...
            wassat
            1. +1
              1 October 2025 20: 54
              Quote: cat Rusich
              Quote: kalibr
              Quote: Nikname2025
              leading to the production of obvious absurdities.

              But this gives you the opportunity to show off my erudition. I simply don't have the time to check all the "eagles" and "throaters." And besides... why should I do that when I know with absolute certainty that you will correct any possible errors?!
              Just a joke ...
              - Vovochka, why do you make so many mistakes in your tests? Am I such a bad teacher?
              -- Marya Ivanovna, you are an excellent teacher, and I make mistakes on purpose so that you have work to correct them...
              wassat

              Exactly! I've never liked doing things I don't have to. Checking all the facts to see if they're correct? What a waste of time and effort... Or finding out one is wrong after sifting through a ton of material... There's always someone who knows better... It saves time and effort. And at the same time, it improves quality. But what if they can't? For 99,9% of readers, it doesn't matter at all...
    2. 0
      30 September 2025 11: 23
      Quote: Ironal
      otherwise, in your article, a revolver carbine is sometimes called a 'shotgun', sometimes a 'rifle', although it is neither one nor the other.

      Can't a rifle be called a shotgun? Three identical words in a row in a short paragraph... that's bad style. This isn't an assembly and disassembly manual, but a popular text. So GOST has nothing to do with it. There are many GOST-based texts that are very difficult and uninteresting to read due to the abundance of terminology and heavy pronunciation.
      1. +1
        30 September 2025 11: 27
        A rifle differs from a shotgun in that a rifle has a rifling barrel, while a shotgun has a smooth barrel.
        1. 0
          30 September 2025 11: 32
          Quote: Ironal
          A rifle differs from a shotgun in that a rifle has a rifling barrel, while a shotgun has a smooth barrel.

          I know, Alexander. But repeating the same terms in a short paragraph isn't very good. It's poor writing style. Otherwise, everyone understood everything. This isn't a text from the "Instructions."
          1. +2
            30 September 2025 12: 28
            Calling a revolver carbine a rifle on a website dedicated to military topics is definitely not appropriate. This is an article about weapons, published in the "Weapons" section, not a science fiction story in the Literary Gazette. Try to respect the readers of this website; I believe they are generally knowledgeable about weapons and military affairs.
            1. 0
              30 September 2025 13: 08
              Quote: Ironal
              Try to respect the readers of the site, they, it seems to me, are mostly knowledgeable about weapons and military affairs.

              I can tell you the same thing. You know a lot about weapons, but you're in no hurry to share your knowledge with VO readers. And that's bad.
              1. +1
                30 September 2025 19: 55
                Once again (and countless times already) THANK YOU!!! for very interesting material!!! Vyacheslav Olegovich!!! hi
        2. 0
          2 October 2025 11: 25
          Quote: Ironal
          A rifle differs from a shotgun in that a rifle has a rifling barrel, while a shotgun has a smooth barrel.

          What about rifles? feel
          P.S. In fact, from the point of view of modern classification, you are, of course, right.
          But even worse oxymorons have happened before.
          1. +1
            24 October 2025 20: 12
            But even worse oxymorons have happened before.

            And in Fedorov’s book, instead of “hole”, “dirka” is used.
  5. +1
    30 September 2025 10: 04
    Revolvers again! I'm sick of them! Boring! Revolvers "pickled", revolvers "battered"! Si ko ko can you? Give me pistols! Take, for example, the Percival and Smith bunker pistol, model 1850! Every Friday, after a glass of my favorite tea, I open the page with this pistol on my computer and try to figure out how, after all, it was loaded! No... there is a brief description of the process! But the details of the process defy my imagination! No. This is what people are missing! fellow (PS About the "annoying" revolvers - a "joke"! About the "misunderstanding" with Percival - it's true! Of course, there are "hypotheses"! But... give us the truth!)
    1. 0
      30 September 2025 11: 19
      Quote: Nikolaevich I
      Regarding the "boring" revolvers - "a joke"

      There will be something about pistols too, just wait a bit.
  6. +4
    30 September 2025 11: 46
    Quote: Nikolaevich I
    But the details of the process are beyond the imagination.
    From the picture, I can surmise that the powder and bullets were fed into the barrel by a spring. After pulling the trigger, the barrel was released, and a new charge of powder and lead was fed by the spring to replace the old charge. Of course, the rate of fire wasn't as high as a pistol...
    1. +1
      30 September 2025 12: 12
      It doesn't look like there's a spring! Firstly, there's not enough space... secondly, the "bunkers" rise upward, hinting at a "gravity" method of loading the charge; thirdly, the spring isn't detected when showing the partial disassembly of the bunkers!
      1. +1
        30 September 2025 12: 21
        Quote: Nikolaevich I
        Something doesn't look quite right

        Vladimir, ask "people in the know." True, there aren't many of them on our site, but they're there. Maybe someone will give you a definitive answer. I'll pass.
      2. +1
        30 September 2025 12: 22
        P.S. The hopper with gunpowder and bullets, judging by its appearance, is divided vertically into "sections" (powder is poured into a section, then a bullet! The "sections" rotate inside the "hopper"!). But how the primer hopper "works" is more difficult to understand... It would be easier to understand if the primer hopper were also divided vertically into "sectors."
      3. +1
        30 September 2025 12: 44
        The secret is simple. After the hammer was cocked, the hopper rotated around the barrel from bottom to top until the holes in it and the barrel aligned. As a result, a bullet entered the barrel from the front, and gunpowder and a "primer"—an igniter pellet—from the rear. Then the hoppers rotated downward again 180 degrees, with their base, formed as a ring around the barrel, covering the holes in the barrel. You could fire, then repeat. In theory, up to 24 bullets could be fired in a very short time.
        1. +2
          30 September 2025 12: 56
          An absolutely correct explanation. It might also be worth noting that the correct name for this pistol is the Percival & Smith Repeating Magazine Pistol.
        2. 0
          30 September 2025 18: 37
          Quote: Ironal
          And the casket just opens

          It's highly likely I've got something mixed up! The thing is, there are two different descriptions on different websites online! 1. Gunpowder and bullets are fed into the barrel from the front "hopper"; primers from the rear; 2. Bullets are fed into the barrel from the front "hopper"; gunpowder and primers from the rear! Logically, option 2 is more likely, but it seems I accidentally overlooked option 1, which could have caused confusion! Although it's still unclear how the primers and gunpowder are fed together in option 2!
          1. +2
            30 September 2025 20: 27
            The front hopper held bullets. The rear had two compartments: the front one held gunpowder, and the rear one held igniter pellets (called "capsules"). The barrel had three holes: one for the bullets, one for the gunpowder, and one for the igniter. When the hoppers were raised, everything fell into the barrel under the force of gravity. From the igniter hole, there was a narrow channel into the barrel through which a beam of fire ignited the gunpowder, like in a percussion pistol. But, naturally, all this could only work if it was perfectly cleaned of carbon deposits, unburned gunpowder residue, the "capsule," and lead from the bullet stuck to the barrel walls. Therefore, it's not a given that all 24 shots could be fired without misfires. Plus, the need for precise fitting of parts with minimal tolerances between the ring with bunkers and the barrel, precise matching of holes, an increased risk of corrosion from contact between parts made of steel and bronze/brass (it seems there were both) and lead in bullets during firing, problems with obturation (it’s not for nothing that the ring has 5 holes on each side to release escaping gases), and the overall bulkiness of the design led to the fact that, according to available data, only about 30 copies were manufactured.
            1. 0
              30 September 2025 20: 44
              Thanks for the clarification! hi Explained clearly and logically! Yes
  7. +5
    30 September 2025 12: 22
    As promised, here's a detailed analysis of the article's blunders and inaccuracies.
    The "Russian Model" cannot possibly be considered "the most widely produced and largest series of revolvers." Smith & Wesson shipped approximately 250 of this model, in all its versions, to Russia. Taking into account production in Germany and Russia, deliveries to the US Cavalry (3), the Ottoman Empire (around 5500), Japan (1000), and civilian sales, the total production can be estimated at a maximum of 500. Compare this to approximately 1 million S&W Victory revolvers and over 6 million S&W Military & Police revolvers.
    There is no such thing as a ".44 Henry rimfire." The cartridge is properly called the ".44 Henry Rimfire."
    I have already written about the "Scofield factory" above.
    "Given them a bluish tint" is called "blueing," one of the standard types of exterior finishing for weapons. And what "stamped" means is completely unclear.
    "All stocks had a screw hole in the forend to allow for the installation of an optical sight" is a clear ignorance of terminology. An optical sight is a diopter sight, while an optical sight is called a telescopic sight.
    "were the last in the series of swing-cylinder revolvers and appeared immediately before the "Hand Ejector" model with a sliding cylinder" - and again, "in a puddle." The S&W Model 10, also known as the S&W .38 'Hand Ejector,' was the company's first model with a side-opening cylinder, as all their revolvers up to that point had a break-frame design.
    "An inertia-type firing pin was used"—not a firing pin, but a striker. The striker is the protrusion on the trigger that strikes the cartridge capsule. The firing pin is a separate component mounted in the frame. Learn the basics.
    "When the hidden hammer rested against the firing pin" – a hidden hammer is a hammer that does not protrude beyond the gun's frame. This is another translation error: it refers to the hammer being released from the cocked position, while regarding "resting against the firing pin," see above.
    1. +2
      30 September 2025 12: 41
      Quote: Ironal
      As promised, here's a detailed analysis of the article's blunders and inaccuracies.
      The "Russian Model" cannot possibly be considered "the most widely produced and largest series of revolvers." Smith & Wesson shipped approximately 250 of this model, in all its versions, to Russia. Taking into account production in Germany and Russia, deliveries to the US Cavalry (3), the Ottoman Empire (around 5500), Japan (1000), and civilian sales, the total production can be estimated at a maximum of 500. Compare this to approximately 1 million S&W Victory revolvers and over 6 million S&W Military & Police revolvers.
      There is no such thing as a ".44 Henry rimfire." The cartridge is properly called the ".44 Henry Rimfire."
      I have already written about the "Scofield factory" above.
      "Given them a bluish tint" is called "blueing," one of the standard types of exterior finishing for weapons. And what "stamped" means is completely unclear.
      "All stocks had a screw hole in the forend to allow for the installation of an optical sight" is a clear ignorance of terminology. An optical sight is a diopter sight, while an optical sight is called a telescopic sight.
      "were the last in the series of swing-cylinder revolvers and appeared immediately before the "Hand Ejector" model with a sliding cylinder" - and again, "in a puddle." The S&W Model 10, also known as the S&W .38 'Hand Ejector,' was the company's first model with a side-opening cylinder, as all their revolvers up to that point had a break-frame design.
      "An inertia-type firing pin was used"—not a firing pin, but a striker. The striker is the protrusion on the trigger that strikes the cartridge capsule. The firing pin is a separate component mounted in the frame. Learn the basics.
      "When the hidden hammer rested against the firing pin" – a hidden hammer is a hammer that does not protrude beyond the gun's frame. This is another translation error: it refers to the hammer being released from the cocked position, while regarding "resting against the firing pin," see above.

      Very good! Thank you, Alexander. It's just a shame that all this appeared before my article, and you didn't bother to write it yourself.
    2. -2
      30 September 2025 13: 27
      This also caught my eye.
      Almost all of the Scofield revolvers were purchased in the late 19th century by the Bannerman Company and restored (they were given a bluish tint

      Confirmation from Yandex Translator:
      Three-and-a-half inches of hard blue steel.

      Three and a half inches of solid blued steel.
  8. +3
    30 September 2025 14: 28
    Q7HELLO from Argentina.
    A friend of mine, an Argentine-Spanish anarchist, gave me this revolver.
    A powerful "thing".
    :)
    I'll take a photo now.
    1. +2
      30 September 2025 14: 58
      Quote: stroybat ZABVO
      Q7HELLO from Argentina.
      A friend of mine, an Argentine-Spanish anarchist, gave me this revolver.
      A powerful "thing".
      :)
      I'll take a photo now.

      How good it is to have anarchist friends!!!
  9. +2
    30 September 2025 20: 32
    Thanks for the article! Oh, revolvers, revolvers! It reminded me of a scene from Clint Eastwood's immortal film "Unforgiven."
    -Give me your Scofield.
    -What for?
    -Come here!
    -Here, take it.
  10. +1
    2 October 2025 09: 28
    Great gallery of photos and short descriptions, thanks to you and your friends!
  11. 0
    3 October 2025 15: 26
    Triple-action revolvers were approved for officers, the officer's Nagant model of 1895.
    , Smith and Wesson triple action could be carried and bought with one's own money, American made, since it was not produced in Russia.