Coastal Battery No. 981 named after K.E. Voroshilov on Russky Island

14 496 63
Coastal Battery No. 981 named after K.E. Voroshilov on Russky Island

More than 30 years ago, during a command post exercise, I had the opportunity to stitch together a large map, approximately 2x2 meters, from several kilometer-sized maps. It depicted the outskirts of Vladivostok and Russky Island, along with various military installations. At that time, the map of Russky Island was literally studded with various symbols denoting the positions of military installations. Defense, radars, communication centers, command posts, long-term defensive structures, artillery At that time, five divisions of S-75M3, S-125M1, and S-300PS air defense systems, as well as several surveillance radars, were deployed on Russky Island alone. Another S-300PS division position was located on the eastern side of nearby Popov Island.

While working on the map, a senior comrade drew my attention to a feature located in the southeastern part of Russky Island, designated as an artillery battery. Considering that the map had several similar features marked with only a letter, I initially didn't understand how this position stood out from the others. Furthermore, given the nature of our air defense, coastal artillery designed to fire at enemy ships didn't hold much interest for me at the time. But given what my senior comrade had told me about this battery, I later wanted to see it for myself. However, this turned out to be no easy task. Until August 2012, transport links to Russky Island were difficult.




A night view of the bridge across the Golden Horn Bay

In July 2012, when I visited Vladivostok again, the cable-stayed bridges across the Golden Horn Bay and the Eastern Bosphorus Strait had not yet been commissioned, and the only way to get to the island was by ferry.


View of the bridge across the Eastern Bosphorus Strait from Russky Island

But finally, the stars aligned, and in September 2025, I was able to realize my dream. My nephew Yaroslav played a significant role in this. Despite his relatively young age, thanks to his numerous talents, determination, and hard work, he now holds a responsible position at the Far Eastern Federal University, where the main events of the Eastern Economic Forum took place from September 3 to 6, 2025.


Hotel complex on the territory of the Far Eastern Federal University

Thanks to Yaroslav's kindness in providing us with transportation, we were able to travel freely around Russky Island, Vladivostok, and its environs. This allowed us to visit not only the Voroshilov Battery but also a number of other interesting places.

Construction of coastal battery No. 981



By the early 20th century, Vladivostok was the only ice-free port in the Far East with a rail link to the European part of the country, and its defense was given special attention. As of 1914, the city was well protected from land and sea. The Vladivostok Fortress comprised 16 forts, 18 fortified positions, and 50 coastal batteries. However, after the end of the Civil War, most of the defensive structures and all coastal batteries needed to be restored, leaving the city without protection from naval attack.

In the current international situation, it was obvious that a military clash between the Soviet Republic and Japan was extremely likely. And given that Vladivostok was the key point of Russian presence in the region, the Japanese fleet Sooner or later, the Japanese army could bombard the city with large-caliber artillery and land troops. After the Japanese army invaded Manchuria in 1931 and soon reached the land border with the USSR, the Soviet leadership decided to strengthen its defensive capabilities in the Far East.

As of 1931, the artillery batteries covering Vladivostok from the sea were primarily intended for anti-landing defense, and the available guns, in terms of range and projectile weight, could not compete with the artillery of Japanese battleships. Consequently, the Revolutionary Military Council decided to dramatically increase the firepower of coastal artillery in the Vladivostok area and improve its protection from enemy fire.

One of the key measures to strengthen Vladivostok's defenses was the construction of a 305-mm turret artillery battery on Russky Island, located west of Novik Bay, two kilometers from the island's southern shore. However, the 305-mm guns mounted in these turrets were neither the only nor the largest caliber of those covering Vladivostok from the sea. Soviet specialists quite reasonably believed that a stationary battery, the coordinates of which the enemy could obtain through human reconnaissance or aerial photography, was not invulnerable even given its high level of protection. Therefore, the Vladivostok Fortress's artillery included mobile railway guns, three of which were 356 mm caliber and three of 305 mm caliber.

The location for the 305mm turret artillery mounts was chosen very carefully, so that the flashes of gunfire from enemy ships during the daytime would not be visible, and the flashes would not allow the precise coordinates of the coastal battery to be determined.


The location of Battery No. 981 on Russky Island

Several sources state that the design and location of the battery were finally approved by K. Ye. Voroshilov, then People's Commissar for Military and Naval Affairs and Chairman of the Revolutionary Military Council of the USSR. For this reason, the battery was subsequently named after him.


The hill on which the battery was built does not dominate the landscape, and the sea is not visible from it. To counteract the ship's aircraft, which could conduct reconnaissance and adjust artillery fire by radio, anti-aircraft guns were planned to be positioned nearby. Furthermore, wells containing explosive charges were constructed around the battery. In the event of enemy shelling, these charges would detonate sequentially, simulating the explosions of enemy shells and misleading the pilots adjusting artillery fire.


Aerial view of coastal artillery battery No. 981

A significant factor in camouflaging the coastal battery was the frequent fog that obscured the firing position. This, however, did not interfere with firing at naval targets, as two command posts and four observation posts with optical rangefinders, connected to the batteries by cable, were located on well-ventilated, fog-free elevations. The main command post is located on Mount Vyatlina at an altitude of 107 meters (1575 meters from the towers), and the auxiliary post is on Mount Glavnaya (279 meters).

The core of the battery's firepower, numbered "981," consisted of two turrets with three 305-mm guns each from the battleship Mikhail Frunze (formerly Poltava), which had been severely damaged by fire and withdrawn from the fleet's combat complement.


Battleship Poltava

By 1934, most of the work involving rock cutting, construction of underground galleries, and concrete pouring was completed. Gun barrels and turret components were delivered to the island by barge. A railway was built from the pier on the shore of Novik Bay to the construction site to transport the multi-ton components and building materials. Machinery and metal structures were also transported across the ice using tractor-drawn sleds. Crushed stone and concrete production facilities were built near the construction site, also connected to the site by a railway line. Sand was mined in Kholuay Bay (now Ostrovnaya Bay).


The turret installation was completed between February and April 1934. The first firing practice took place in November 1934. Initially, the optical rangefinder was exposed. A protective armored cover was installed for it later.


Full combat readiness was achieved only in 1941, after the command posts were completed and equipped with Zeiss stereoscopic rangefinders housed in rotating armored turrets and VBK-1 periscopic sights, which were used to determine the direction of the target. The main command post housed an electromechanical computer that generated firing data in semiautomatic mode.


In addition, there were four observation posts with horizontal baseline rangefinders, which recorded shell splashes relative to the target's position. Each post was connected to the command post via cable, providing a live view of the battle. Target and splash coordinates were processed on a separate device—a direct course machine. Powerful searchlights were also installed in the southern and eastern parts of the island to illuminate targets at night.


In standard semiautomatic guidance mode, commands were transmitted to the guns via cable, and the gunners aligned the needles on the dials of the receiving instruments. The entire sighting and rangefinding system provided faster and more accurate firing data than on a ship, where it was necessary to take into account the ship's own speed, direction, and pitching.

The structure and tactical and technical characteristics of the Voroshilov battery



The rotating part of the turret mount, removed from the battleship and designated MB-3-12 after conversion, weighed approximately 950 tons. The mass of the entire structure was 1200 tons.


The turret rests on 144 steel balls at its base, and the mechanism itself is driven by electric motors. The entire structure is based on giant columns, around which are arranged the rooms and complex mechanisms used to lift ammunition to the guns and for traverse and elevation. The thickness of the turret block's plating is 2,8 meters, the front wall is 4 meters, the vault is 3,5 meters, and the side and rear walls are 1,5 meters.


The towers' underground floors are connected by a 250-meter-long deep-level tunnel equipped with blast-proof armored doors. Post-war, the tower installations were modernized and, in addition to an improved fire control system, were equipped with blast protection systems. weapons mass destruction.


The battery was connected to the island's centralized power grid, but also had its own backup diesel power plants and the ability to manually rotate the turrets—a task requiring the combined efforts of 10-12 men. The battery had its own 25-meter-deep artesian well, providing an independent water supply for the gunners. Each turret had a crew of 75 men, and the total number of personnel, including those providing life support, logistics, and security, could exceed 400.


For the turret crews directly involved in combat operations, the first underground floor had sleeping berths and lockers, dining areas, and service quarters for commanders.


On the middle level, equipped with a fire extinguishing system, there were charging cellars where 1200 propellant powder charges were stored in special zinc cases on shelves.


Three live semi-charges were used for firing, as well as an auxiliary charge designed to warm up the barrel before live firing in cold weather. The auxiliary charge was fired without a projectile.


In order to ensure explosion and fire safety, all those descending into the artillery cellars were required to hand over smoking accessories, matches, lighters and weapons.


On the third underground floor, 305-mm artillery shells of various types, up to 600 units, were stored on racks.


The supply of charges and shells, as well as loading of guns, were well mechanized by the standards of the early 20th century, which ensured a rate of fire of 1,5-2 rounds/min.


However, given the size and weight of the charges and shells, replenishing the ammunition load was a very difficult task.


The 305mm guns, located in the turrets, could be fired either one at a time or in a salvo.


All tower components and mechanisms are designed with a high degree of robustness, ensuring an enviable longevity. They still appear fully functional.



To increase the firing range, during the Soviet era, a 305-mm lightweight high-explosive shell of the 1928 model, weighing 314 kg and containing 55,2 kg of explosives, was introduced into the ammunition load.


A reinforced propellant propellant charge weighing 140 kg gave the lightweight projectile a muzzle velocity of 950 m/s and an effective range of up to 35 km. The projectile's flight altitude at maximum elevation at the highest point of its trajectory reached 11 km.


This firing range, combined with the 180-mm turret artillery mounts of coastal batteries No. 26 on Askold Island and No. 220 on the Gamov Peninsula, made it possible to reliably control the sea area on the approaches to Vladivostok.

During the training shooting, practice projectiles were used that did not contain explosives and whose initial velocity and weight corresponded to armor-piercing, semi-armor-piercing, and high-explosive projectiles of the 1911 model.


For communication during artillery fire, shockproof ship telephones STA1-2/A were used, allowing for negotiations at high levels of external noise.


The 305mm gun barrels were manufactured before the Revolution at the Obukhov Steel Foundry. Each barrel weighs over 50 tons and is 52 calibers long (15,850 mm).


The photograph clearly shows the dimensions of the 305mm gun barrel, next to which my wife is standing. Also impressive are the dimensions of the breech and breech of the 305mm guns, separated from each other by bulkheads inside the turret.


One of the 305mm gun barrels of the turret closest to the southern end of the island is fitted with a 45mm semi-automatic universal cannon 21-K, which is apparently intended for sighting and training purposes.


Until recently, these rare 45mm cannons were used on large warships of the Russian Navy as salute guns.

It's worth noting that most of the components and mechanisms of the turret artillery mounts are in very good condition. Also, the descriptions of the exhibits are free of any glaring omissions, as is often the case with other military-historical museums, and this speaks to the due attention of the staff of the Voroshilovskaya Battery museum complex and the high level of technical consultants.

Service of the coastal 305-mm turret artillery battery No. 981 named after K.E. Voroshilov



Soon after all command posts and observation posts, equipped with optical instruments, computers, and communications equipment, were operational and full wartime combat readiness was achieved, new gun barrels were installed. The old ones were removed and, after being lined, the spare barrels were stored in a recessed shelter near the turrets, where they remain to this day.


Considering that the enemy could use saboteurs to disable the coastal battery before the attack, a system of anti-landing and anti-sabotage defenses was constructed around the firing position, consisting of trenches and prefabricated reinforced concrete emplacements, and the barbed wire entanglements were electrified. The Voroshilov Battery was assigned a security battalion armed with 45mm cannons, light and heavy machine guns, and 82mm mortars. Defense against enemy aircraft was provided by an anti-aircraft battery armed with 37mm 61-K automatic cannons and quadruple 7,62mm machine guns. The turret mounts were carefully camouflaged. Simultaneously, a dummy battery with wooden turrets was established on the island.


During World War II, coastal artillerymen covering Vladivostok maintained a high level of combat readiness and were highly trained, regularly conducting training exercises. People's Commissar of the Navy N. G. Kuznetsov attended one such exercise in 1944. A moving target was hit by the first salvo.

Unlike Coastal Battery No. 30, located near Sevastopol, which was similar in composition, Battery No. 981 on Russky Island never fired at a real enemy. However, training and control firing exercises at the Voroshilov Battery were conducted regularly (the last time was in 1991). When the guns fired, the blast wave damaged the windows in nearby settlements, so the islanders were warned before the training exercises, and their windows were covered with mattresses.


After each firing, the personnel carried out maintenance and cleaning of the guns, which required considerable physical effort.


The first underground floor still contains equipment for cleaning gun barrels.


Fire control systems were gradually improved. In 1944, the optical rangefinders were supplemented with a British-made radar station, obtained through Lend-Lease. In 1945, the 981st Battery became the first in the entire Soviet coastal defense to conduct firing at an unobserved training naval target using radar guidance. In 1950, the Bolshevik Plant (formerly the Obukhov Plant) repaired the turret mounts. A major overhaul of the battery's electrical equipment was also carried out at the same time. Subsequent repairs of varying degrees were regularly carried out until 1991.

In 1951, the battery changed its name: it was renamed the 1561st Separate Artillery Division. In the 1950s, domestically produced Redan and Shkot radars were installed near the main command post. Soon after the death of I.V. Stalin, the battery was renamed again, this time to the 511th Turret Artillery Division, eliminating its security battalion and anti-aircraft cover.

In 1958, a reduction in personnel was carried out, and two years later, the turret mounts were mothballed, leaving only thirty men to guard them. Simultaneously, all railway batteries covering Vladivostok were disbanded, and the guns were scrapped. The same happened to all small- and medium-caliber coastal artillery. Large-caliber coastal artillery was also partially reduced. Only the Voroshilovskaya and several batteries with 180mm turret guns remained in mothballs.

In the 1960s, all coastal turret artillery mounts of the Pacific Fleet were slated for decommissioning, but after tensions with China worsened, they were reactivated. In 1965, the Voroshilov Battery was reactivated, underwent medium repairs, and was renamed the 122nd Turret Artillery Battalion.


In 1968, the command post received a new Zalp-B gun-guiding radar station, which significantly expanded the capabilities for detecting and firing at visually invisible surface targets.

In 1987, scenes from the film "Moonsund," based on Valentin Pikul's novel of the same name, were filmed at the firing position and inside the turrets. The sailors were played by Voroshilov Battery artillerymen dressed in pre-revolutionary uniforms.

Until the early 1990s, the equipment and training of personnel operating 305mm turret artillery mounts were high. The final firing tests, held in 1991, resulted in a "good" rating.

In the 1970s, consideration was given to radically enhancing the combat capabilities of 305mm coastal turret artillery mounts by introducing guided projectiles or rocket-assisted projectiles "with a special warhead" into their ammunition complement. However, these plans did not receive support from the naval command.


The last battery commander from 1991 to 1997 was Lieutenant Colonel G. E. Shabota, who organized the protection of the equipment entrusted to him from looters and put a lot of effort into organizing the museum.


A significant portion of the battery's infrastructure remains intact. The firing position with its turret mounts has become a museum. However, the main command post was looted, and the concrete structure of the post itself, along with the rangefinder unit and radar unit, remains in its place. On the searchlight platform at Cape Vyatlina, the personnel barracks remain, as do the searchlight installations themselves.

In 2017, a branch of Patriot Park opened near the battery's firing position. Unfortunately, the battery's historic appearance was damaged in the process.


Google Earth satellite image of the Voroshilov Battery Museum and Patriot Park branch. The image was taken in November 2024.

The site where military equipment and artillery pieces from the Patriot Park exhibit are now located was for a long time a large grassy clearing where tents for personnel were placed in the summer.


Soviet post-war Tanks in the exhibition of the Patriot Park branch

When the park was created, this clearing was filled with clay mixed with crushed rock, and then topped with concrete slabs. The niche housing the crane used to replace gun barrels was covered with a shooting gallery.


Artillery guns on display at the Patriot Park branch

While visiting the museum complex, I noticed that the Voroshilov Battery and the exhibits from the Patriot Park branch were of great interest not only to Russians but also to Chinese tourists. The Chinese citizens reacted enthusiastically to the museum exhibits, and I asked my nephew Yaroslav, who understands Chinese quite well, to translate what they were saying.


It turns out that Chinese tourists had a long and emotional discussion about whether it was possible to manually lower the barrel of a T-54 tank's gun, and if so, how low, and whether it would be possible to lock it in that position.

Despite the very reasonable price of an adult ticket (300 rubles), my overall impression of the Voroshilov Battery was positive. I can confidently say that there are very few military historical sites in our country that are preserved to such a high level of original authenticity.
63 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +23
    28 September 2025 04: 07
    Sergey, thank you so much for the excellent review of the historical battery. good
    A huge thank you to the people who preserved all of this. I can perfectly imagine what was going on there in the 90s...
    1. +17
      28 September 2025 04: 21
      Quote: faiver
      Sergey, thank you so much for the excellent review of the historical battery.

      Good afternoon! Andrey, thank you for your kind words, but Seryozha is out overnight fishing today and won't be able to participate in the discussion.
      I'd like to add that this review uses only a small portion of the photographs and materials collected. As far as I know, another article is in the works, dedicated to technical artifacts and military history monuments found in Vladivostok and its environs.
      1. +9
        28 September 2025 04: 24
        We will wait for a new article. bully
        Well, good catch to Sergei bully
      2. +5
        28 September 2025 21: 54
        Olya, you are great, respect to Sergey for the article, and we have a new addition;
        Mona
        1. +5
          29 September 2025 11: 51
          Vladislav, hello!
          Congratulations on the new addition! We also have a new addition at home; we picked up an "old lady" (a cat, not a fish) from the store. smile
  2. +6
    28 September 2025 04: 48
    I'd really like to visit! And see the true power of RUSSIAN WEAPONS! I think they should be kept in good working order. Not a single large-caliber shell has been intercepted by air defense systems yet!
    1. +3
      29 September 2025 11: 55
      Quote: Aleksandral
      In my opinion, it would be worth keeping this in good working order. Not a single large-caliber projectile has been intercepted by air defense systems yet!

      The use of stationary artillery batteries was relevant until the advent of long-range, precision-guided sea- and air-launched cruise missiles. Now, even high-security protection does not provide the required survivability for stationary turrets with large-caliber guns. No.
      1. 0
        28 January 2026 08: 02
        Quote: Bongo
        Quote: Aleksandral
        In my opinion, it would be worth keeping this in good working order. Not a single large-caliber projectile has been intercepted by air defense systems yet!

        The use of stationary artillery batteries was relevant until the advent of long-range, precision-guided sea- and air-launched cruise missiles. Now, even high-security protection does not provide the required survivability for stationary turrets with large-caliber guns. No.

        Is survivability guaranteed for silo installations? For aircraft parked in the open at airfields? For submarines moored at berths? I won't mention the anti-tank missile system yet, but it's also quite vulnerable.
        1. 0
          28 January 2026 08: 15
          Please don't confuse warm with soft. This publication is about stationary artillery batteries.
  3. +10
    28 September 2025 04: 52
    Thank you very much, Sergey!

    The battery makes a strong impression. And, of course, the 12-inch guns from the Poltava. The same can be seen on the 35th Battery in Sevastopol.

    The Voroshilov battery is very well located.
  4. +6
    28 September 2025 05: 46
    Thanks for the review. Excellent.
  5. +18
    28 September 2025 05: 47
    We've been there many times with our whole family. It was very educational. The places there are simply wonderful. Especially watching the sunrise on Russky Island or on Popov Island... The oceanarium, etc. The Far East is truly something special. I've lived here for 42 of my 46 years, in the Amur Region, Yakutia, and Khabarovsk... I only vacation in Primorye... I'm never leaving here... I can't even think about it. The photo is from three years ago... My daughter is about 11 years old here.
  6. +6
    28 September 2025 05: 49
    Excellent as always. Thank you!
  7. +10
    28 September 2025 06: 25
    When I was a TOVVMU applicant, we did our KMB training on Russky Island in July-August 1991. We were living in a tent camp on Shigino at the time, a battalion of future cadets. I remember well when a Voroshilovka was conducting target practice, and some of the windows in our headquarters shattered. They were pretty loud... I only visited the battery itself when it became a museum; it's a monumental structure in every respect. You can hide there if something happens.
  8. The comment was deleted.
  9. +10
    28 September 2025 07: 23
    Upon successful completion of the project in Vladivostok, we were thrilled with a trip to Russky Island.
    We covered what we could.
    The frost was below minus 30.
    But we didn't regret it.
  10. +6
    28 September 2025 07: 26
    Thanks to the author for the article. Western Russia also has similar coastal artillery installations, only these were enemy-owned and mostly underground. These were the bunkers of the German coastal batteries at Neutief-Lemberg in Baltiysk, the main base of our Baltic Fleet. We didn't get to explore them during our military service, but ten years later, during "retraining," we had plenty of time to explore. Of course, a lot of sand has already been "conquered" there, but the underground spaces that housed bunkers for personnel and ammunition, target designation bunkers, the galley, and the power plant were impressive even after so many years, when no one had restored them. They say that now, on the initiative of the residents of Baltiysk, lovers of the history of our Motherland, these underground coastal structures have been put in order as much as possible, as artifacts of military history, although they were enemy structures.
    Another thing that resonates with today's article about the city of Baltiysk is the artillery rangefinder mentioned and shown in the article. A tower in Baltiysk still stands, housing a powerful artillery rangefinder. Only this tower, over the base of a powerful concrete and steel German pillbox, was built by the Soviet military almost immediately after driving the Germans out of Pillau, and it served to spot artillery fire from our armored trains. The Germans didn't build towers like that; they built everything underground in bunkers... So that tower in Baltiysk also housed a powerful Zeiss rangefinder. Incidentally, this tower could also have been restored, especially since it was built by Soviet architects and military builders during such a difficult time. It turned out quite beautiful and has stood there for 80 years, but now it's in very poor condition. What, there is no branch of the Patriot Park in Baltiysk???!!!
    1. +5
      29 September 2025 11: 57
      Quote: north 2
      Only this tower, above the base of the most powerful concrete and steel German pillbox, was built by the Soviet military literally immediately after driving the Germans out of Pillau, and it served to adjust the artillery fire of our armored trains.

      Probably not "armored trains", but railway batteries?
  11. +11
    28 September 2025 08: 02
    Wonderful story, very interesting good
  12. -4
    28 September 2025 08: 35
    K. E. Voroshilov, who was then the People's Commissar for Military and Naval Affairs and Chairman of the Revolutionary Military Council of the USSR. As a result, the battery was subsequently named after him

    The Higher Military Academy (formerly the Academy of the General Staff of the Red Army) also bore the name of K.E. Voroshilov, as did the Military Chemical Academy, although he not only failed to graduate from it, but also had no military education whatsoever, not even sergeant school. Which seems simply ridiculous.

    But he did a good job of mowing down the teachers and graduates of the Academies.

    The basis of the firepower of the battery, which received the number "981", were two turrets with three 305-mm guns each from the battleship "Mikhail Frunze" (former "Poltava"
    ...Nicholas II's "plough" continued to "plough" for another century...

    The article is good, thank you.
    1. +5
      28 September 2025 09: 58
      Although he not only didn't graduate from it, but also had no military education at all, not even sergeant school. Which seems simply ridiculous.
      - not in defense of Voroshilov, but your beloved Nicholas II didn't finish anything either bully
      1. -4
        28 September 2025 10: 08
        Quote: faiver
        Not in defense of Voroshilov, but your beloved Nicholas II didn't finish anything either

        There were no Academies named after Nicholas II, but he received a broad education, covering both the gymnasium curriculum and university subjects, as well as military training. From 1885 to 1890, he studied public and economic law as part of the university curriculum and simultaneously completed a course at the General Staff Academy. He was fluent in French, German, and English, and also received thorough knowledge in the field of military affairs, .

        Just say it's normal when someone calls someone by the name of an uneducated, illiterate person. higher educational institutions?
        1. +7
          28 September 2025 10: 17
          You somehow forgot to mention that those who lectured Nikolai had no right to question him on the material he covered. bully
          Just tell me, is it normal when a higher educational institution is named after an uneducated, illiterate person?
          - Excuse me, I'll answer in Hebrew - is it normal for people to be awarded military ranks and state awards from childhood for no reason? bully
          1. -8
            28 September 2025 10: 24
            Quote: faiver
            I will answer in Hebrew

            I'll answer the same way, in Hebrew. bully -Yes.
        2. +1
          30 September 2025 13: 30
          Quote: Olgovich
          .....but there were no Academies named after Nicholas II, yet he received a broad education, covering both the gymnasium curriculum and university subjects, as well as military training. From 1885 to 1890, he studied public and economic law as part of the university program and simultaneously completed a course at the General Staff Academy. He was fluent in French, German, and English, and also received thorough knowledge in the field of military affairs, .
          What benefit does this knowledge provide to the country? None.
          1. -2
            30 September 2025 13: 51
            Quote: Reptiloid
            what use country from this knowledge. No
            belay lol
            1. -1
              30 September 2025 14: 03
              I see, you're having fun. The hungry years of the 19th century, when the Bolsheviks were unknown, the Russian Revolution, the First Russian Revolution throughout Russia, the shootings of people marching with requests for an "educated tsar," Stolypin's military courts, Stolypin's ties, WW1... You're having fun.
              1. -1
                1 October 2025 10: 29
                Quote: Reptiloid
                The hungry years of the 19th century, when the Bolsheviks were unknown, the Russian Revolution, the First Russian Revolution throughout Russia, the shooting of people's marches with requests for an "educated tsar," Stolypin's military field courts, Stolypin's ties, WW1

                This is the dream of a country that in the 1930s experienced the most terrible famines and executions in the history of the world.
  13. +7
    28 September 2025 08: 44
    Sergey, thank you for the excellent overview article. It's good that such a unique object wasn't destroyed, cut up, or scrapped.
  14. +7
    28 September 2025 09: 21
    Thank you for the interesting and detailed article.
    Three live semi-charges were used for firing, as well as an auxiliary charge designed to warm up the barrel before live firing in cold weather. The auxiliary charge was fired without a projectile.

    Presumably, the auxiliary shot also involves removing grease from the barrel before the main shot. After cleaning the barrel, it is thoroughly lubricated, generously.
  15. +8
    28 September 2025 09: 35
    ship "Mikhail Frunze" (former "Poltava")

    Resolution of the Defense Committee under the Council of People's Commissars of the USSR "On the transfer of the battleship Poltava for scrap"
  16. +4
    28 September 2025 12: 04
    Thanks for the review. The battery has a good name in honor of a much-underappreciated military and statesman in our history.
    1. 0
      28 September 2025 23: 05
      Quote: Enotovich
      a very undervalued military and statesman in our history.

      Read the People's Commissariat of Defense's acceptance report from May 7, 1940, to understand: whose work was underestimated? They should have overestimated him and impaled him for the collapse of the Red Army.
  17. 0
    28 September 2025 13: 13
    As of 1931 year

    The construction of a 305-mm artillery battery on Russky Island began

    It's strange. Our most likely enemy has long had superdreadnoughts, while we're using some second-hand gun for our new coastal battery. As far as I remember, Leningrad was used to test 406mm guns for Soviet battleships, which were never built. Why didn't they install 406mm guns here? Sure, 305mm guns are fine, and there's no point in wasting such calibers, but what would they do if they had to fight an enemy battleship?
    In the event of enemy fire, these charges would detonate one after the other, simulating the explosions of enemy shells and misleading the observer pilots adjusting artillery fire.
    This is a really cool idea.
    and the guns were cut up into metal.
    It's a shame. This caliber needs to be maintained.
    1. +1
      28 September 2025 13: 19
      But what would you do if you had to fight an enemy battleship?
      - hm, so it's pretty much the same thing the Americans did with Yamato and its younger brothers
      1. +1
        28 September 2025 13: 26
        Quote: faiver
        - hm, so it's pretty much the same thing the Americans did with Yamato and its younger brothers
        Then it would be necessary to build not coastal batteries, but naval aviation.
        1. +2
          28 September 2025 13: 27
          one does not interfere with the other...........
        2. Alf
          +2
          28 September 2025 21: 16
          Quote: bk0010
          Quote: faiver
          - hm, so it's pretty much the same thing the Americans did with Yamato and its younger brothers
          Then it would be necessary to build not coastal batteries, but naval aviation.

          And aircraft carriers. Lots of aircraft carriers. But the economy and finances aren't made of rubber.
          1. +2
            28 September 2025 21: 45
            Quote: Alf
            And aircraft carriers. Lots of aircraft carriers.
            Naval aviation isn't necessarily carrier-based. The USSR had no time for aircraft carriers.
            1. Alf
              +5
              28 September 2025 21: 50
              Quote: bk0010
              Quote: Alf
              And aircraft carriers. Lots of aircraft carriers.
              Naval aviation isn't necessarily carrier-based. The USSR had no time for aircraft carriers.

              But after the war, coastal aviation emerged in the USSR, so the threat was more or less mitigated. Before the war, there weren't even any aircraft of that class. Well, unless you consider the R-5T a serious threat... Incidentally, the DB-3 did fly with a torpedo.
              1. +2
                29 September 2025 19: 30
                By the way, the DB-3 did fly with a torpedo.
                And the Lend-Lease "Boston".
                1. Alf
                  +1
                  29 September 2025 19: 31
                  Quote: Aviator_
                  By the way, the DB-3 did fly with a torpedo.
                  And the Lend-Lease "Boston".

                  Well, yes, but only after WWII.
                  P.S. I confess I forgot about this miracle of the foreign aviation industry. Thank you.
                  1. +1
                    29 September 2025 19: 33
                    Well, yes, but only after WWII.
                    If I'm not mistaken, in the Baltic in 1945.
            2. 0
              1 October 2025 01: 31
              Quote: bk0010
              Naval aviation isn't necessarily carrier-based. The USSR had no time for aircraft carriers.

              In 1935, military leaders were skeptical that an aircraft would be able to inflict significant damage on a large ship, like a battleship or cruiser, anytime soon. The attitude toward strike aircraft in naval warfare was roughly the same as the attitude toward attack drones in 2015.
    2. +3
      28 September 2025 18: 13
      Quote: bk0010
      and we're installing some second-hand stuff on our new coastal battery

      Nothing surprising. It was a common practice back then (and earlier) to equip coastal defenses (and fortress artillery—you'll be surprised to see the equipment of Swiss pillboxes in the early to mid-20th century, where they even included bronze barrels) with obsolete artillery systems.
      Quote: bk0010
      but what would you do if you had to fight an enemy battleship?

      Shoot at other targets. Battleships don't sail alone. Although, I doubt the Kongos would be happy to find themselves under fire from this battery.
    3. Alf
      +5
      28 September 2025 21: 15
      Quote: bk0010
      Why didn't they put 406mm guns here?

      Because 16-inch guns like the ZiS-3 aren't mass-produced. The production lead time for such a barrel is over a year. The first such gun was only tested at the end of 1939. Production wasn't planned until 1942.
      1. +2
        28 September 2025 21: 45
        Quote: Alf
        The first such weapon was only TESTED at the end of 1939.
        That is, it simply didn't exist. Understandable.
        1. Alf
          +3
          28 September 2025 21: 47
          Quote: bk0010
          Quote: Alf
          The first such weapon was only TESTED at the end of 1939.
          That is, it simply didn't exist. Understandable.

          No offense. The thing is, if you write briefly, then, based on experience, you'll have another dozen posts on the "why." It's easier to just lay out all the layouts at once.
  18. +6
    28 September 2025 15: 04
    Thanks for the wonderful article and photos.
    We had 12" barrels in storage in our arsenal. But I don't know if they were the same or 40-caliber ones.
    P.S.
    By the beginning of the 20th century, Vladivostok was the only non-freezing Far Eastern port
    So freezing request
    1. +2
      29 September 2025 12: 00
      Quote: Senior Sailor
      So freezing

      Well, let's say it's "partially" frozen. The ice there isn't too thick, and in recent years, it's been quite thin.
  19. +4
    29 September 2025 06: 49
    Sergey! This is simply wonderful material. Please accept my deepest admiration.
    1. +4
      29 September 2025 12: 01
      Quote: kalibr
      Sergey! This is simply wonderful material. Please accept my deepest admiration.

      Vyacheslav Olegovich, your praise is especially pleasant! drinks
    2. +2
      29 September 2025 12: 32
      Quote: kalibr
      Sergey! This is simply wonderful material. Please accept my deepest admiration.

      Judging by what you were given,-"There are characters who were 'spat in the soul' by Seryozha with this article." request
      1. +3
        29 September 2025 15: 47
        Quote: zyablik.olga
        Judging by the fact that you were given a "-" there are characters who were "spat in the soul" by Seryozha with this article.

        I'm always amazed by the people on our site who downvote someone without specifying what exactly caused their displeasure. Moreover, the question often arises, "Who are the judges?" Everything about us, the authors, is known—who, what, when, and how. Commentators are anonymous, which puts us at a disadvantage. Should we heed the downvote and try to improve because the person who gave it is an expert in the field, or... is he simply feeling a little bitter, something didn't work out with his wife last night, and he's looking for someone who can safely vent his anger, at least this way.
  20. -1
    29 September 2025 15: 39
    I read the article with Zhora Shabot. To say "there are a lot of mistakes" is an understatement.
    1. +5
      29 September 2025 15: 42
      Quote: 22 dmdc
      Just say "lots of bugs"

      It would be great if all these "jambs" were listed and discussed in detail in a material entitled "An Error-Free Article about the Battery on Russky Island." Back then, it wasn't just an empty assertion, but a very useful piece of work.
      1. 0
        30 September 2025 01: 57
        Retired Colonel Georgy Eduardovich Shabot commanded the 122nd Separate Turret Artillery Battalion until its disbandment on July 1, 1997. He tried to comment on the article yesterday, but was unable to register with VO immediately. I hope he finds the time and desire to share his arguments with the community.
        1. +3
          30 September 2025 07: 03
          Quote: 22 dmdc
          I hope he will find the time and desire to share his arguments with the community.

          I would like to!
        2. +1
          5 October 2025 15: 26
          "Voroshilovka" is waiting for guests.
        3. 0
          10 October 2025 15: 46
          https://journal.morpolit.ru/voroshilovskaya-batareya-georgiya-shabota/?ysclid=mgktxty6tu936260859
  21. +4
    29 September 2025 19: 27
    Very high-quality historical material. Respect to the author!
  22. +3
    30 September 2025 18: 21
    Sergei hiI read it easily and in one sitting. I liked both the content and the presentation. Thank you for your work!
    I also read that "retired Colonel Georgy Eduardovich Shabot, former commander of the 122nd separate turret artillery division" is preparing to argue with an argument in order to demonstrate to everyone "many flaws."
    Truly, it would be interesting to broaden one's horizons, but it is unlikely to improve or worsen the material you presented.
    I shake your hand with respect! good
    1. +2
      20 October 2025 19: 03
      Three weeks have passed... and silence...
      1. +1
        20 October 2025 21: 52
        It seems it wasn't meant to be...request