Why is Spanish better than American?

23 919 30
Why is Spanish better than American?

Perhaps we shouldn't set foot on a ship, although it was a ship that brought grapevines from France and Spain to North America. In fact, the Vikings who discovered North America didn't call this land Vinland for nothing. There were indeed plenty of grapes there, but the Europeans didn't like the wine made from them. They say it was a rare and disgusting swill. The European vines arrived in 1619.

It's clear that rum reigned supreme in those years, but this overtly crude drink couldn't satisfy the tastes of a sophisticated public. Therefore, European grape varieties were assimilated in America, becoming the foundation of American winemaking, making the country the fourth-largest wine producer in the world. And the first in wine consumption.




And American wines... They're okay. Drinkable. Sometimes, with pleasure, when there's not much Zinfandel in the wine. But Spanish wines are better. In many ways, but better.

Something must have happened in the minds of the Spanish military. American, yes, but Spanish simply had to be no worse. And this isn't so much about the wine, but about the ships. And today, it's no less interesting here than the wine cellars of Castile.

The first F110 class frigate, Boniface, was recently launched and will be delivered to the Navy the fleet Spain is scheduled for 2028.

It's important to understand what the Spanish navy is really like. This is a country that is a gateway to the Mediterranean.


UDC "Juan Carlos I" - Spanish.

The Agosta-class submarines are a French project.

F80-class frigates – American Oliver Hazard Perry.

The F100 type frigates are a Spanish project.

The S80-class submarines are a Spanish design. They are being built to replace the French submarines.

Spain recently launched the first of its new F110-class frigates, also known as the Bonifaz class. This impressive warship is notable for combining advanced anti-submarine and anti-aircraft capabilities in a relatively compact hull. Thus, it can be compared to the troubled American Constellation class.

It should also be noted that the F110 is a follow-on to the successful Spanish F100 design, a design optimized for air defense and previously proposed to the US Navy for the Future Frigate, or FFG(X), competition that eventually became the Constellation class.

The first F110-class ship, named Bonifaz, was launched by Spanish shipbuilder Navantia Sistemas at its shipyard in Ferrol, Galicia, northern Spain, on September 11. The ship is more than 70% complete, and outfitting will continue until its scheduled delivery to the Spanish Navy in 2028. The ship features a high degree of automation and the ability to expand its functionality in the future.


Launching ceremony of the frigate Bonifaz, the first ship of the F110 program for the Spanish Navy, in Ferrol, September 11, 2025. Navantia

Bonifaz is the first of five frigates of its class ordered for the Spanish Navy, which will ultimately replace six 1980s-era F80 Santa María frigates based on the US Navy's Oliver Hazard Perry-class design.


The Spanish Navy frigate Santa Maria, the lead ship of its class, is preparing for a replenishment at sea (RAS) mission off the coast of Brazil.

Three new-class frigates with a displacement of 6,000 tons, including the lead ship, are currently under construction in Ferrol. Four blocks of the F112 hull are already on the slipway following the keel laying in April 2025, while the remaining blocks of the F112 and all nine blocks of the F113 are under construction in the workshops.

The frigates possess certain stealth characteristics and are designed to allow for the adaptation of their crew composition, weapons, and sensors to meet new mission requirements. In other words, they offer significant modernization potential.


From the outset, the F110 was intended to be a true multi-role warship. Therefore, its primary mission—anti-submarine warfare (ASW)—doesn't mean its air defense capabilities should be limited, although its rocket Surface-to-air weapons in this context are surprisingly light, as we'll see later. Perhaps this is a matter of further modernization, perhaps not. Time will tell.

The F110's design is centered on the Lockheed Martin AN/SPY-7(V)2 radar and the International Aegis Fire Control Loop (IAFCL) fire control system, acquired under a U.S. government Foreign Military Sales (FMS) contract. These components were integrated into the vessel by Navantia, along with its own Sistema de Combate de los Buques de la Armada (SCOMBA) battle management system.

Mounting the AN/SPY-7(V)2 radar housing at a high altitude on a warship's elongated superstructure provides the radar with a decent line-of-sight range for its size. This design reflects the general trend toward mounting sensors at high altitudes, exemplified by the distinctive UNICORN mast on the main superstructure of the Japanese Mogami-class frigate. However, the F110 appears to take this concept to a new level.


Japanese frigate Mogami with UNICORN mast. JMSDF

The SPY-7 is a very powerful sensor that has previously demonstrated its ability to track small targets even outside the Earth's atmosphere. However, this experiment used the AN/SPY-7(V)1 version of the radar, and it's difficult to accurately determine the difference in capabilities between the two.

Suffice it to say that the design of the SPY-7 naval radar is largely identical to the Long Range Discrimination Radar (LRDR), a ground-based early-warning radar installed at the Cleveland Spaceport in Alaska. The SPY-7 radar, particularly its ability to track targets in space, is crucial for missile defense. Another question is how to reconcile the ability to detect missiles in space and destroy such targets? This requires, at a minimum, appropriate interceptors.

And the F110 class ships will not be equipped with weapons, capable of destroying ballistic missiles, especially in the mid-flight phase, but data from their radars could be transmitted to other ships and ground systems that could do the same. This is a completely feasible option.

The SPY-7's exceptional capabilities can also be used to maximise the potential of the Spanish Navy's existing F100 frigates, which are more optimised for air defence.


F110 concept art

Otherwise, in terms of air defense, the new F110 has a relatively light armament, consisting of the RIM-162 Block 2 version of the Advanced Survivable Missile (ESSM). These are housed in two Mk 41 Vertical Launch Systems (VLS), each with eight cells. Each cell contains four missiles, for a total of 64 ESSMs. These protect the frigates from air threats at short and medium ranges and can provide basic air defense to cover other nearby assets. Longer-range missiles, particularly from the Standard Missile family, may be added in the future.


First tests of the improved Sea Sparrow Block 2 missile

To perform their primary anti-submarine mission, the F110-class ships are equipped with a hull-mounted sonar and a high-performance compact towed sonar, the CAPTAS-4, both manufactured by Thales, as well as a flight deck for one SH-60 or NH90 helicopter, with two hangar bays. The second bay can also be used for unmanned systems or to expand the ship's capabilities. Underwater targets can be attacked by the helicopter or the ship's own torpedoes.


To engage surface targets, the F110-class ships are equipped with two four-round launchers for Kongsberg Naval Strike Missiles (NSM).

The full armament of the new Spanish Navy frigates also includes a 127mm gun in a bow turret, a pair of 30mm cannons, and mounts for light machine guns at various points on the deck. Small boats can be launched from the ship. The ship will be equipped with modern electronic warfare and electronic surveillance systems.

In many ways, the F110 class exemplifies a new generation of frigates, where, while anti-submarine warfare is the primary mission, a balanced suite of sensors and weapons enables the warships to perform a wide range of missions. A similar design approach can be seen, for example, in the British Type 26 project, which is being built for the Royal Navy, as well as for Australia and Canada. Norway also recently announced the purchase of the Type 26.


An infographic showing the various key components of the Type 26 frigate. BAE Systems

Interestingly, the US Navy withdrew from the Type 26 program for its future frigates, or FFG(X), which was ultimately won by a design based on the Italian Navy's version of the Fregata Europea Multi-Missione (FREMM) multi-role frigate, and rejected a Spanish proposal to build an FFG(X) based on the F100 frigate.


An infographic detailing how much the Constellation design will differ from its parent model, FREMM.

The Constellation class will be the US Navy's next class of small surface combatants, and the command has previously stated that it wants to "buy at least 20 of these ships." Like the F110-class ships, they will be multi-mission, with anti-air, anti-ship, and anti-submarine capabilities, designed to support larger surface groups or operate independently. However, the Constellation-class ships will be more heavily armed than the F110-class ships.


Spanish Navy frigate Cristóbal Colón, Alvaro de Bazan class

The Constellation program has currently encountered a number of issues, including an unexpected increase in overall weight, which could reduce their top speed. This is just one problem affecting the new frigate due to the complexities associated with major changes to the ship's configuration compared to the original FREMM design. Ironically, the entire goal of building the FFG(X) from an existing production frigate was to reduce costs, delivery times, and risks. Instead, the warships have turned out larger and heavier, and are several years behind schedule. Cost reduction is not even discussed.


Image of the future first-of-its-class USS Constellation. Fincantieri

Of course, we don't know how the FFG(X) program would have developed if the US Navy had chosen the Spanish F100-based design instead of the FREMM.

However, at this point, the F110 frigate program appears to be progressing on time: Bonifaz is being launched a month ahead of schedule, unlike the American/Italian project.


Conceptual rendering of the new F110-class frigate, also known as the Bonifaz class. Navantia

With various navies in need of new frigates, the F110 could well become an attractive export product and, at the very least, a powerful complement to the Alvaro de Bazan-class frigates. In fact, the twinning of F100 and F110 ships is truly an interesting proposition. The F100, with its anti-ship missiles and a decent package, Defense and the F110, with its anti-submarine warfare capabilities and equally impressive air defense, could represent a decent system.

8 Harpoon anti-ship missiles, 8 NSM, 64 Standard missiles and 96 ESSM missiles, 8 anti-submarine torpedoes, 32 bombs in rocket launchers plus some barrel artillery, which, in essence, does not decide anything today.

Overall, it's more than sufficient to form an umbrella and engage in disruptive submarine operations. The F110 is superior for this, but its predecessor is also quite capable in the ASW role, although the Bonifaz's towed sonar is a welcome addition.

And what about America?


Nothing. Apparently, the days when American destroyers, frigates, and landing ships sold like hotcakes are a thing of the past. Today's "successes" in American shipbuilding are leading former buyers of US shipbuilding products to stop reflecting, and instead act on the idea that their own is somehow closer and more reliable.

The Spanish are understandable: the Santa Maria-class frigates, built on the Oliver Perry design under license at Spanish shipyards and slightly different from the original, are somewhat outdated. The youngest is 30 years old, the oldest 40. But the Americans have nothing to offer their allies, so the Spanish are making do on their own.

It's worth noting that, judging by the F100, the Spanish are doing quite well. Yes, the F110 is about 1500 tons "thicker," but that only means it can accommodate more equipment.

So, Spain will receive its ten "gatekeepers" to guard the Strait of Gibraltar quite easily and effortlessly. And there's a fair degree of certainty that the Spanish Navy will receive its ships well before the American one. And that, one might say, answers the question in the title.


And wine from Spanish vineyards is still much better than American wine.
30 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +3
    25 September 2025 04: 18
    To engage surface targets, the F110-class ships are equipped with two four-round launchers for Kongsberg Naval Strike Missiles (NSM).

    This is true, but the photo shows a RIM-7 "Sea Sparrow" air defense missile system.
    In the future, we may see longer-range missiles, particularly from the Standard Missile family.

    Well, they say the SM-2 can carry it. And it's somehow illogical to have an SPY-7 without an SM.
    8 Harpoon anti-ship missiles, 8 NSMs

    Most likely 8 NSM anti-ship missiles, they are lighter and much more effective than Harpoons.
    Of course, we don't know how the FFG(X) program would have developed if the US Navy had chosen the Spanish F100-based design instead of the FREMM.

    I suspect it's about the same as now. The Americans are plagued by the "let's just cram the best" mentality, which clearly doesn't lead to faster construction. They should have scaled back their own requirements, and then they would have produced a mass-produced Peri-class frigate.
    The F110, with its anti-submarine warfare capabilities and equally impressive air defense, could be a decent system.

    But it turned out to be VERY expensive—860 million euros for the borscht. That's why the Americans refused: if it originally cost a billion, then with their "additions," it would cost up to 1,5 billion.
    1. +3
      25 September 2025 11: 51
      Quote: Puncher
      The Americans are plagued by the "let's just cram the best" mentality, which clearly doesn't lead to faster construction. They should have scaled back their own desires, and then they would have produced a mass-produced Peri-class frigate.

      Well, before that, the Yankees managed to come up with an LCS based on the specifications for a mass-produced, low-cost littoral combat ship. Two projects, actually. smile

      They were lucky to have used an existing design as the basis for their new frigate. If they had designed it themselves, from scratch, the resulting frigate would have been larger and more expensive than the Burke. smile
      1. +1
        25 September 2025 11: 58
        Well, before that, the Yankees managed to come up with an LCS based on the specifications for a mass-produced, low-cost littoral combat ship. Two projects, actually.

        Moreover, both are expensive.
        They were lucky that they used a ready-made design as the basis for their new frigate.

        Moreover, they managed to spoil it - they removed a normal cannon and completely removed the anti-submarine weapon from the ship.
      2. +1
        25 September 2025 12: 24
        Quote: Alexey RA
        Moreover, two projects.

        It was completely beyond comprehension, plus the speed requirements were simply idiotic. It's as if, upon learning that the USSR was simultaneously producing three types of tanks, they exclaimed, "What, was that even possible?" and started spewing nonsense.
    2. +1
      26 September 2025 17: 32
      Apart from the hull itself, there's nothing Spanish—it's American, Belgian. We'll see when the Italians/Americans show up.
  2. +1
    25 September 2025 07: 21
    Gibraltar
    is a castle to the Mediterranean Sea

    But Spain has nothing to do with it
    1. +5
      25 September 2025 08: 14
      Quote: novel xnumx
      But Spain has nothing to do with it

      Take advantage of the Royal Navy's weakness and avenge Trafalgar...
  3. -2
    25 September 2025 07: 53
    The F110 is a new generation frigate which, despite the fact that anti-submarine warfare is the main task

    How does this manifest itself? Yes, there's a built-in and towed sonar, and 1-2 ASW helicopters are available. But ASW missiles (missile and torpedo or nuclear warhead) have disappeared completely, with RBUs ​​remaining only in the Russian Navy, and 2x3 torpedo tubes are standard, even in those that don't claim ASW capabilities. How will they destroy the SSNs—just target them with ASW aircraft, both carrier-based and shore-based?
    1. +2
      25 September 2025 08: 04
      Quote: severok1979
      But the anti-submarine missiles (missiles and torpedoes or nuclear warheads) have disappeared somewhere.

      Maybe they don't say it, but if the Mk41 is sized for the SM-2, the Asrock will fit. And it's stupid not to use the Asrock, considering there's only one helicopter. So, without ASW missiles, the ASW capability is simply weak. The Peri had LAMPS, TWO! A helicopter, torpedo tubes, ASW missiles, and a sonar system in two forms. It's impossible for a modern frigate to have such gaping ASW capabilities.
      1. kig
        +2
        25 September 2025 12: 10
        [quote=Puncher]Maybe they don't say,[/quote]
        [severok1979] How is this expressed?[/quote]
        Yes, and it seems that all we can do is discuss foreign news...
      2. +3
        25 September 2025 15: 36
        Quote: Puncher
        Peri had LAMPS, TWO! helicopters, a TA, an PLUR, and a GAS in two guises.

        The Oliver Hazard Perry-class guided missile frigates did not carry anti-submarine missiles (ASGMs). The Mark 13 launcher was capable of firing Tartar, Standard SM-1, and Harpoon anti-ship missiles, but not RUR-5 ASROC ASGMs.

        For this reason, the AN/SQS-56 underkeel sonar on these frigates was rather weak. It was not required to provide target designation for anti-submarine missiles. Deck helicopters performed searches based on target designation from the towed AN/SQR-19 passive sonar with infrasound radar. At least two helicopters were required on board the ship, both to eliminate direction-finding ambiguities (the sonar with radar did not provide range determination, although it searched in three hydroacoustic illumination zones) and to survey multiple potential contacts with underwater targets at long ranges.
        1. +4
          25 September 2025 17: 11
          Quote: AlexanderA
          The Oliver Hazard Perry guided missile frigates did not have anti-submarine missiles.

          You've corrected me correctly. I was talking nonsense and confused it with the Mk26...
  4. +5
    25 September 2025 08: 13
    But grapes were in short supply in the New World. In Vinland, wine was distilled from blueberries or gooseberries, so it was fruit and berry, as they would say now.
    1. 0
      26 September 2025 18: 58
      Vinland was opened on October 9th and Marketer's Day was celebrated on October 25th.
  5. +1
    25 September 2025 09: 00
    However, the Constellation-class ships will be more heavily armed than the F110-class ships.

    The Constellation is a complete misunderstanding. They managed to install no anti-submarine weapons on a large frigate. None at all. And the gun is 56 mm, which means it's impossible to use it on shore.
    The Spaniard still looks much more balanced.
    A 127mm gun means it can operate on the shore. Mk41 ESSM and SM-2 cells are also available. There's also the new Sentinel 25 RFG small-caliber anti-drone and anti-helicopter gun-missile system, along with other small-caliber weapons. Space has been reserved for a promising anti-drone beam weapon and a mine countermeasure system.
    The frigate's core armament is the AEGIS integrated weapons system, supplied by Lockheed Martin, incorporating the new AN/SPY-7(V)2 radar system. The ship will receive a 16-round Mk 41 universal vertical launcher for firing Raytheon RIM-66M-2 SM-2MR Standard Block IIIA and Raytheon RIM-162 ESSM Block 2 surface-to-air missiles (four per cell). The F-110's other armament will include eight Kongsberg NSM anti-ship missile launchers, one Leonardo 127/64 LW 127mm/64 universal gun mount, one new Escribano Sentinel 25 RFG 25mm five-barrel anti-aircraft gun system, two Escribano Sentinel 30 30mm single-barrel remote-controlled gun mounts, four Escribano Sentinel 2.0 12,7mm remote-controlled machine gun mounts, and two Mk 32 Mod 9 324mm twin-tube torpedo tubes for Mk 54 anti-submarine torpedoes. The hangar provides permanent basing for two NH-90 NFH/TTH or Sikorsky MH-60R helicopters, and space is reserved for UAVs.

    And who came up with the idea of ​​having just one helicopter? He has two hangars, and a space reserved for UAVs.
    Looks promising. However, there aren't enough Mk41 cells.
    1. 0
      25 September 2025 09: 09
      The ship will have a sophisticated electronic warfare suite, including the Navantia SCOMBA automated control system and a number of Indra-developed systems, including the Prisma-25X surface target detection radar with fixed active electronically scanned arrays (AESA), the Rigel i110 and Regulus i110 electronic reconnaissance systems, and the IRST i110 optical-electronic detection and tracking system. Enhanced anti-submarine capabilities will be provided by a combination of the Thales UMS-4110 BlueMaster underhull sonar, the Thales CAPTAS 4 towed sonar, and the Thales BlueScan integrated underwater information processing system.
    2. The comment was deleted.
  6. +9
    25 September 2025 11: 07
    Well, well! It turns out that 30-40-year-old ships in the NATO Navy are "somewhat outdated," but our 40-year-old rusty Russian dinosaurs are still "modern" and "competitive." Very funny. Even Spain is building modern ships. Glory to United Russia! We're moving towards disarmament by leaps and bounds.
    1. 0
      25 September 2025 12: 22
      disarmament is good..............
      1. +1
        26 September 2025 22: 01
        Quote: Nastia Makarova
        disarmament is good

        When the enemy is disarmed. But when you...
        1. +1
          27 September 2025 21: 35
          Judging by the rate (which continues to increase) of production of combat aircraft (this year there will be 126 new heavy fighters, not counting the rest), tanks, anti-aircraft guns, missiles, and UAVs of all classes, it's not like we're disarming. It's just that we're facing another land war, and there's no time to disperse forces and resources. Besides, no matter how much you invest in surface naval shipbuilding, it will all be stolen and sabotaged. This means the government wants to steal, not build a combat-ready navy.
          But the Air Force, Strategic Missile Forces and Ground Forces are developing and strengthening.
          But still - "like under Nicholas II".
          That is, the efficiency of public administration is below what can be imagined.
          1. 0
            28 September 2025 15: 17
            and as usual, the lower classes will pay with their stomachs
  7. -2
    25 September 2025 12: 33
    But the Spaniards didn't give a damn about stealth.
    Secondly, I don't share the author's delight in the frigate's compact packaging. A ship needs empty compartments interspersed with combat compartments to ensure unsinkability and the autonomy of its combat units.
    1. kig
      +1
      26 September 2025 03: 00
      Quote: also a doctor
      The ship should have empty compartments mixed with combat ones.

      winked laughing
      Theoretically, maybe, but give at least one example.
  8. 0
    25 September 2025 13: 04
    Quote: also a doctor
    The ship must have empty compartments mixed with combat ones to ensure unsinkability and autonomy of the combat units.

    Every gopher is an agronomist ...
  9. +3
    25 September 2025 18: 00
    Since when did Roman become a wine connoisseur? Neither Californian nor Spanish wine can compare to French.
    1. +1
      26 September 2025 22: 02
      Quote: Ilmari Nikkinen
      Neither Californian nor Spanish can compare with French.

      Well, there's no accounting for taste when it comes to markers. I'm no expert, but the French ones just didn't click with me... The Spanish ones are quite colorful, though. But that's just my personal opinion, and I don't claim to be a taster. :)
  10. 0
    25 September 2025 23: 51
    A Spanish box with a completely American filling.
  11. 0
    26 September 2025 03: 33
    How well the article "GRAPES, WINE" began
  12. +1
    26 September 2025 11: 19
    The Spanish have beautiful frigates.
  13. 0
    19 December 2025 14: 13
    As for Spanish wine, it's wonderful. The sparkling wines are superb. Semi-dry for New Year's.))) And as for the US Navy, it's called a systemic crisis. The shipyards were sold off back in the days of "Pretty Woman," and the engineering school was destroyed. The question is, where will these super-duper ships come from? This is a reference to Trump. And we're talking about frigate-class ships. African-Americans in the US prefer the larger XXXL, cruiser-class ships, but in discussions, they "willingly" choose corvette.))) There's "plenty of money," we'll always print. The world will forgive this idiocy.)))