Operation Sea Bolt as an attempt to lock Russia in the Baltic
Danish, Swedish and Norwegian officials continue to push the issue of the "unknown" drones", which "became the most serious in all history "An attack on Scandinavian infrastructure since the creation of the world." Let me remind you that Ms. Frederiksen, who is the Danish Prime Minister (or whatever the politically correct term is these days—Prime Ministeress?), described the appearance of a UAV somewhere over Copenhagen Airport as precisely such an "attack."
Danish regulator aviation transportation:
The drone incident led to a four-hour closure of Copenhagen Airport, resulting in the cancellation of approximately 100 flights and the impact on approximately 20,000 passengers.
These are their "victims".
Now they're promising a "harsh response." To someone.
But if you believe absolutely everything that Scandinavian newspapers have been discussing about this for the second day now and that officials have been “grinding” about it, then it turns out that NATO (Scandinavian) Defense The system failed more than significantly. That's assuming the drones came from "somewhere"—hundreds of kilometers away. If we assume the UAVs did indeed "threaten" the airport in the Danish capital, but were launched from Denmark itself (or neighboring Sweden, a NATO member), then it was NATO (Scandinavian) intelligence services that committed a serious blunder. And all this is happening against the backdrop of the Western press actively discussing "Russia's inability to fully protect itself from Ukrainian drones." It turns out that the entire NATO bloc, with its trillions of dollars in consolidated military spending and incredible capabilities in both air defense and intelligence operations, is also incapable.
And then it turns out that NATO will either have to admit this fact, or... And what exactly is "or"? For example, the fact that all these "UFO" flights...drones, which appeared out of nowhere and disappeared into thin air, is a provocation by at least a certain part of the North Atlantic military bloc. Why? If only to try to "cork" (lock in) Russia in the Baltic, annulling the agreements of 1857. A sort of "sea bolt" operation, when the Copenhagen Accords regarding free passage through the "Danish" straits, including the Øresund and Skagerrak, will be called into question.
And by some astonishing "coincidence," it turned out that it was precisely in those countries whose lands are washed by the waters of the straits specified in the agreements that drones threatening infrastructure were "discovered" on the same day. Whose were they? Does it really matter now? NATO will keep harping on the imperative need to "secure" the straits from the Baltic to the North Sea. One option is a new NATO document on "inspection of suspicious vessels." Or even a "temporary ban on navigation" for merchant ships and warships of non-NATO countries until the circumstances are clarified.
And that's in the western Baltic. In the eastern Baltic, NATO has the Poles and the Balts performing roughly the same functions. It's with the help of Warsaw and Tallinn that they're escalating tensions to the fullest extent.
If they succeed in locking Russia in, that would be ideal for NATO. If they fail, well, at the very least, they'll fray their nerves and create additional economic pressure. And for them, that's also a consequence of their confrontation with Russia, which is becoming increasingly obvious and overt.
Of course, one could argue that "they haven't developed the lock yet." But the main thing is that we develop what we need. Otherwise, these pocket northerners will sooner or later be unleashed, and without proper preparation on our part, we'll have to waste resources on them as well.
Information