American "Know-Nothings" of the early to mid-19th century

8 219 28
American "Know-Nothings" of the early to mid-19th century
Dunno in all his glory!


But the most famous among them was a little boy named Dunno. They called him Dunno because he knew nothing. This Dunno wore a bright blue hat, yellow, canary-yellow pants, and an orange shirt with a green tie. He loved bright colors. Dressed as a parrot, Dunno would wander around town all day, making up all sorts of tall tales and telling everyone. He also constantly bullied little girls. So, upon seeing his orange shirt from afar, the little girls would immediately turn around and hide in their homes.



Nikolai Nosov. "The Adventures of Dunno and His Friends"


History, which few people know. It so happened that on our website "VO" an article by Viktor Biryukov appeared, dedicated to the specifics of two important historical events in American history – the Revolutionary War and the Civil War. In the comments, a number of our readers expressed some pity for the defeated Southerners. They claimed they were the bearers of patriarchal values, while the Yankees brought the cult of greed to the fertile South. Well, that's partly true. Moreover, there are two very interesting books: "Gone with the Wind" by Margaret Mitchell and "Uncle Tom's Cabin" by Harriet Beecher Stowe. Moreover, while the former was written in 1936, the latter in 1852, that is, right after the war.

If we were to evaluate them in the most basic terms, one would be "for" and the other "against" the situation that developed in the United States on the eve of the Civil War. But both books examined its causes. These were also examined by Soviet-era US history textbooks, and, again, many of them cited these causes. However, far from all of them. This is because the problem with our humanities was that… far from all the laws of social development were known at the time these books were written, or were known but ignored. Therefore, they tended to adopt a highly simplified view of events. But life, as it turned out, was far more complex than those same Marxist models, even if at first glance they appeared harmonious and logical. And so today we will become acquainted with one aspect of American life on the eve of the Civil War, something I recently promised to write about to a number of our readers.

Let's start with the fact that everyone has probably heard of our Soviet Dunno, Nikolai Nosov. But... if we were transported in a time machine to the United States, say, in 1850, we might easily encounter people there who were also called... "Know-Nothings." And all because, to a whole series of questions, they unanimously answered: "I know nothing!" And there were quite a few such people there, a veritable mass movement, which was called "the party of the Know-Nothings" or "the party of the Know-Nothings."

Followers of the "Know-Nothing" movement believed there was a "Romanist" conspiracy to undermine civil and religious freedom in the United States, organized by Catholics—that is, in modern parlance, they were all victims of a "conspiracy theory." The "Know-Nothings" sought to unite native Protestants in defense of their traditional religious and political values—that same original patriarchal system brought to America by the Pilgrim Fathers on the "May Flower."

Protestants feared that Catholic priests and bishops would control a significant portion of the voters among immigrants who had become American citizens. However, in most places, the Know-Nothing movement's ideology and influence lasted only one or two years, after which it disintegrated due to the weakness and inexperience of local leaders and a deep division over slavery. In some Southern states, their party, unlike in the North, did not emphasize anti-Catholicism and took a neutral stance on slavery; nevertheless, it became the main alternative to the dominant Democratic Party.

Interestingly, anti-Catholic sentiment was widespread in colonial America, but it played a minor role in American politics until the arrival of large numbers of Irish and German Catholic immigrants in the 1840s. The result was a movement of nativists, or "native American Protestants," directed against them. They made their presence known in New York as early as 1843, after which their movement quickly spread to neighboring states under the name "Native American Party." They achieved success in a number of local and congressional elections, notably in 1844 in Philadelphia, where anti-Catholic orator Lewis Charles Levin was elected representative from Pennsylvania's 1st District.

In the early 1850s, numerous secret societies emerged, the most important of which were the Order of United Americans and the Order of the Star-Spangled Banner. They emerged in New York City in the early 1850s as secret organizations that quickly spread throughout the North, attracting non-Catholics, especially members of the lower middle class and skilled workers.

Interestingly, the name "Know Nothings" originated in the party's semi-secret organization. When asked about their activities, members were expected to answer, "I know nothing." Outsiders derisively referred to the party members as "Know Nothings" or, more colloquially, "Know-Nothings," and the name stuck. And in 1855, the Know Nothings first entered politics under the name "American Party."

The collapse of the Whig Party after the passage of the Kansas-Nebraska Act in 1854 paved the way for the emergence of a new major political party opposing the Democratic Party. The essence of this law was that whether or not slavery would be allowed in a state was to be determined by a simple majority vote of the state's residents, and understandably, it outraged Northerners. The split between pro- and anti-slavery forces not only led to the disintegration of the Whig Party, with most of its northern members joining the new Republican Party, but also led to armed clashes in Kansas, known as "Bleeding Kansas."

The tensions created by these events became one of the main causes of the American Civil War. This was especially true because Kansas joined the Union in 1861 as a free state, while Nebraska only achieved this status after the war ended, in 1867. And in all these events, the "Know-Nothings" played a very active role, adding fuel to the fire of political confrontation between the North and the South.

The Know-Nothings initially succeeded in electing their representative, Nathaniel P. Banks of Massachusetts, and several others to Congress in the 1854 elections, after which they united to form a new political party. In the South, it became a tool for politicians opposed to the Democrats. Many members and supporters of the American Party also hoped that it would occupy a middle ground between the pro-slavery Democratic Party and the radical anti-slavery elements of the rapidly growing Republican Party.

It also nominated former President Millard Fillmore for the 1856 presidential election, but he kept his membership in the party secret and personally refrained from supporting the activities and ideology of the Know-Nothing movement. In the 1856 presidential election, Fillmore received 21,5% of the vote, losing to both the Democratic and Republican candidates. Henry Winter Davis, an active Know-Nothing supporter, was elected to Congress from Maryland as a member of the American Party. Once in Congress, his first act was to blame "un-American" Irish Catholic immigrants for the recent election of Democrat James Buchanan as president. Here's what he said:

"The recent elections have exacerbated all the problems the American Party opposed. Foreign allies formed the country's government—people who received citizenship by the thousands on the eve of the elections. Once again, in the fierce struggle for power, people forgot the Republic's prohibition on religious interference in politics. These factors led to a huge turnout of foreign-born citizens who have no understanding of American interests, harbor no American sentiments, and are guided by foreign sympathies when voting on American issues. And these votes, in essence, led to the current result."

This all reminds me of something, doesn't it? And there's something very familiar in his words...

A "conspiracy theory" is generally irrational, and the fears it generates are usually existential. But in this case, the immigration of large numbers of Irish and German Catholics to the United States between 1840 and 1860 turned religious differences between Catholics and Protestants into a serious political issue. Sometimes, brawls broke out at polling stations, with the use of weapons.

Protestants claimed that Pope Pius IX had contributed to the failure of the liberal revolutions of 1848 in Europe and called him an enemy of liberty, democracy, and republicanism. One Boston priest called Catholicism "an ally of tyranny, an adversary of material prosperity, an enemy of thrift, an enemy of railroads, caucuses, and schools." Conspiracy theorists actively spread information about the Pope's intentions to subjugate the United States through a steady influx of Catholics controlled by Irish bishops, who answered only to the Pope and were personally appointed by him.

Immigration in the first five years of the 1850s reached a level five times higher than the previous decade. Most of the new arrivals were poor Catholic farmers or workers from Ireland and Germany, who settled in the tenements of large cities. Social welfare spending, naturally, immediately skyrocketed. Crime also increased. For example, in Cincinnati, the crime rate tripled between 1846 and 1853, and the murder rate increased sevenfold. During the same period, Boston's spending on welfare for the poor tripled. So, to a certain extent, the situation was similar to what we face today!

To be continued ...
28 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -4
    5 October 2025 05: 57
    The article is very harmful; if it were up to me, I would send VOS to the GULAG, and then the editor (moderator) of this site.
    Only an enemy could have mixed Nosov's great character "Dunno" with the American Civil War.
    The cause of the American Civil War is economic, and the fiction books the author refers to are artistic interpretations of life, and "Gone with the Wind" is deeper than "Uncle Tom's Cabin."
    Like in the joke - the development of America: from Uncle Tom's cabin to Barack Obama.
    1. +7
      5 October 2025 06: 07
      “Therefore I speak to them in parables, because though they see, they do not see; and though they hear, they do not hear; neither do they understand” (Matt. 13:13).
    2. +17
      5 October 2025 06: 42
      Only an enemy could have mixed Nosov's great character "Dunno" with the American Civil War.

      Good morning, Sasha!
      For the sake of truth, our Nosov Dunno does have American, or rather Canadian, roots.
      In the late 19th century, Quebec artist Palmer Cox illustrated a small American magazine, including drawing children's comics. The comics' main theme was the adventures of little forest creatures known as brownies (house spirits), pranksters, and jokers. Cox created about forty of them, each with a distinct appearance: Cholly Boutonnière wore a top hat and monocle (he would later become Murzilka), another dressed like a Chinese peasant, a third was a Native American chief, and so on. They even had their own poet and doctor, Pill Mixture. Cox's original "know-it-all" brownie was the former nihilist Russian professor Kotchakoff. Cox's comics were published in magazines for many years, and then Palmer began publishing books. They were translated and published in other countries, and in Russia they were published by translator Anna Yuryevna. Sometimes Anna wrote as if she were writing herself, inspired by Cox's ideas. Her first fairy tale, influenced by the Canadian, was called "The Kingdom of the Little Ones," first published in 1889. Already in "The Kingdom," Dunno and Murzilka, borrowed from Cox but renamed, appear. In 1913, Khvolson published another saga with illustrations by Cox, "The New Murzilka. The Amazing Adventures and Wanderings of Little Forest People." As in the first book, Anna Borisovna made a free translation of Cox's texts, renaming the characters: Murzilka, Maz-Peremaz, Dedko-Borodach, Znayka, Neznayka, the dexterous Skok, the hunter Mick, Vertushka, the Chinese Chi-ka-chi, the Indian Ski, Doctor Microbka, the American mechanic and inventor John, and so on. This book and others were so popular that they were not forgotten even in the turmoil of the revolution, and the children's magazine founded in 1924 was renamed "Murzilka" out of habit, although A. Yu.'s main character was no longer the cane-wearing, monocled dandy Cholly Boutonniere, like Cox's, but a white dog with a camera, a scarf, and a beret, narrated by Khvolson in the book. After the war, N. Nosov joined the magazine's editorial staff, publishing numerous stories about funny little people, and made no secret of the fact that he borrowed the idea from Cox and Khvolson. But how many readers of his books know this today?
      1. +6
        5 October 2025 07: 06
        Good morning, Dima!
        I'm not looking for analogies with America; our Dunno is all of us. We are learning about the world, making a lot of mistakes.
        Rhetorical question: "Would you like to be Znayka?"
        Button and Pilyulkin are absolutely positive characters, but everyone else is grotesque.
        Mixing Dunno with the supposedly racist causes of the American Civil War, where each side had at least 10% black troops, is a provocation.
        I hope you are doing well.
      2. +6
        5 October 2025 13: 05
        This is very niche knowledge about the genesis of American Murzilka characters and our Dunno. Although, in the 90s, there were reprints of pre-revolutionary Murzilka characters. I have one lying around somewhere. At one time, this book inspired me to try to understand the character's history.
        And yet our Dunno is nicer.
        My complaint about the author of this article is that the image chosen for the first illustration isn't the most interesting. I've read books with Dunno characters like this.
        Nosov's first illustrations were done by Grigorieva and Polyakova in 1953. But they featured short, adult characters. In 1954, Alexey Laptev created the iconic image of a tomboy in a huge hat.
        1. +5
          5 October 2025 14: 04
          Good afternoon, Vladimir!
          balabol: I have the following complaint about the author of the article: the image chosen for the first illustration is not the most interesting.
          .
          I agree, Vladimir. Not the best analogy.
          balabol:And yet our Dunno is nicer.

          I agree 100%!!!
          balabol:I had books with Dunno characters like this.

          And in our family library we also have this green three-volume Nosov edition from 1969 with illustrations, “read to pieces” by me, my son, and my daughter, and now by our 11-year-old granddaughter:
          Volume 1. The Adventures of Dunno and His Friends. Dunno in the Sunny City. Illustrations by A. Laptev.
          Volume 2. Dunno on the Moon. Illustrations by G. Valk
          Volume 3. Stories. Fairy Tales. Novels. Illustrations by I. Semenov, G. Pozin, G. Valka, V. Ladyagin

          Thanks to my late parents, who stood in line at the bookstore for several nights to get a subscription.
          1. +5
            5 October 2025 16: 27
            I had a big red volume of Nosov's Adventures in Sunny City. The "Golden Library" series with Laptev's illustrations. "Dunno on the Moon" is absolutely gorgeous (a unique phenomenon in Soviet literature). There's also a separate volume with Volk's works. The illustrations have different aesthetics. In "Dunno on the Moon," the characters' surroundings are a great stylization of 60s American Art Nouveau.
      3. 0
        27 January 2026 18: 17
        Anna Yuryevna
        Khvolson
        Anna Borisovna
        Who is who?
    3. +3
      5 October 2025 08: 23
      This character has most of these articles.
    4. +2
      5 October 2025 08: 49
      Quote: ee2100
      Mix Nosov's great character "Dunno" with the American Civil War
      In chemistry it's called emulsification, when trying to mix two completely immiscible components...
      1. +4
        5 October 2025 11: 55
        when they try to mix the two

        They don't try, but mix liquids that are insoluble in each other or a solid dispersed substance in a liquid. For example, milk
    5. +13
      5 October 2025 09: 03
      Quote: ee2100
      I would send VOS to the GULAG, and then the editor


      Those sent to the Gulag soon found themselves there or in Kommunarka.

      The author has the right to his point of view and the style of its presentation, as does the editorial board of VO. I consider the transition to insults to be unacceptable.
      1. +5
        6 October 2025 11: 59
        Quote: Olgovich
        Those sent to the Gulag soon found themselves there or in Kommunarka.

        Yeah... first you cleanse the party and the country of enemies of the people, but time passes and you become the organizer of an anti-Soviet treasonous group of conspirators whose criminal goal was to use the Ministry of Internal Affairs, both centrally and locally, against the Party and its leadership, against the Government of the USSR, to place the Ministry of Internal Affairs above the Party and the Government in order to seize power, liquidate the Soviet system, and restore capitalismThe cycle of enemies of the people: future enemies of the people purge current enemies of the people. And there are no exceptions—except to die before they come for you.
    6. +10
      5 October 2025 09: 19
      The article is very harmful; if it were up to me, I would send VOS to the GULAG, and then the editor (moderator) of this site.

      Not *twenty two*, no? bully Your relationship with the author is, of course, a personal one, but in this particular case, I'll take the liberty of simply disagreeing with the proposed method. Aren't there enough Gulags in our history? hi Article? I'll answer this way: unexpected.
    7. +1
      5 October 2025 21: 51
      Quote: ee2100
      The cause of the American Civil War is economic,

      The American Civil War was a continuation of the American Revolutionary War. In the mid-19th century, the United States was a semi-colony of England, as was, incidentally, the Russian Empire. The country possessed enormous wealth, but all the profits from its exploitation ended up in English banks, thanks to the ruling class of the time. Mass emigration altered the balance of power. A new national elite emerged, and it was this elite that unleashed the war.
    8. +3
      6 October 2025 12: 12
      Quote: ee2100
      I would send VOS

      It's not nice... a personal attack is a sign of weakness and nerves...
  2. +5
    5 October 2025 06: 18
    This all reminds me of something, doesn't it?

    "When Marianne takes on the beautiful visage of a young Frenchwoman from an immigrant family in our town halls, that day we will have taken a step forward in fully embodying the values ​​of the Republic."
    2003, Laurent Fabius, socialist, then minister of the Interior of Hollande...
  3. +3
    5 October 2025 08: 34
    Mixing Nosovsky's Dunno and the American Party knowing nothing (know nothings) is equivalent to putting an equal sign between the butt of Homo erectus and the brain Homo sapiensThe author should first turn to the transliteration of BASP - White Anglo-Saxon Protestant. That's where it all stems from - from the anti-Romanism of the 16th century, to the fight against Barack Obama and Trump's combing over know nothings...
  4. +6
    5 October 2025 10: 47
    These are the kind of caricatures of Catholics that were published in the USA at that time.
  5. +6
    5 October 2025 12: 43
    I liked the article because it included stories I wasn't familiar with, such as the American Third Party and its representatives. A little off topic, but not too much: "persecution" of Catholic and Italian immigrants continued in the 1950s and 1960s for a variety of social and criminal reasons.
    1. +5
      5 October 2025 16: 05
      and Italian immigrants continued in the 1950s and 1960s for a variety of social and criminal reasons.

      *Do I look Irish?* laughing A line from the main character in the excellent film *Green Book*. These persecutions were usually motivated by criminality. And, of course, by the everyday chauvinism of the Anglo-Protestant white population of the United States. However, these *guys* weren't very kind to everyone (to put it mildly).
      1. +6
        5 October 2025 18: 53
        What I'm writing may seem ridiculous, but it's true. To combat these stereotypes and negative attitudes toward Italian-Americans, Joe Colombo founded the Italian-American Civil Rights League (IACRL), which grew to 46,000 members, including many well-known figures. Joe Colombo was identified as a leader of organized crime and a spokesman for this new organization. I'm writing this article because I just watched a series of RAI documentaries from the 1960s that interviewed many of these figures.
      2. +3
        5 October 2025 21: 42
        Quote: ArchiPhil
        These persecutions were usually motivated by criminal activity. And, of course, by the everyday chauvinism of the Anglo-Protestant white population of the United States. However, these *guys* weren't very kind to everyone (to put it mildly).

        "Everyday chauvinism" is a good definition, although behind it lies a desire to simply throw out "newcomers" if they show any advantage. It's amusing to hear about "native" Americans who, not long ago, were themselves just like "newcomers." In the EU, they say, some of the most active opponents of immigrants are themselves immigrants, only a couple of generations older. In a world where competition between people is paramount, this will always be the case.
  6. 0
    6 October 2025 17: 07
    Crime level and social security costs, naturally, immediately and sharply rose. Crime has also increased.

    The butter is buttered.
  7. +2
    6 October 2025 20: 35
    Nothing new, really. Protestant America was alienating its Catholic population. It all started with Acadia and Louisiana, with its New Orleans, where French Catholics lived (they had previously been brutally resettled there by the British). Then, the remaining Spanish population was simply kicked out of Florida. Cuba, Puerto Rico, and the Philippines came later, but they were simply not incorporated into the state. Religious intolerance as it is.
  8. +2
    7 October 2025 00: 03
    One Boston priest called Catholicism "an ally of tyranny, an adversary of material prosperity, an enemy of thrift, an enemy of railroads, party meetings, and schools."

    Did the Protestants really combine slavery with ultra-progressive technocrats who cared about the railway business?
    What a strange combination, though.
  9. 0
    7 October 2025 02: 03
    The article is interesting. But even more interesting are the 2100 comments. Just think what a pimple that's burst!
    However, perhaps this senior warrant officer is simply mentally ill?
  10. 0
    29 November 2025 02: 03
    In any case, the article is interesting. The opinions may be controversial, but the facts presented are fascinating.